Treatment Of Esophageal Cancer Research Articles

Study on Correlation and Mechanism of Procollagen Lysine 2 Oxoglutarate 5 Dioxygenase on Stem Cell Characteristics and Vasculogenic Mimicry Formation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

In this study, we investigated the significance of the stem cell transcription factor PLOD2 in esophageal cancer to enhance our understanding of its occurrence, development, recurrence, metastasis, and potential treatment. We conducted the following experiments: (1) Immunohistochemistry revealed elevated PLOD2 protein levels in esophageal carcinoma compared to adjacent tissues, with higher levels associated with advanced disease stages and lower differentiation. (2) Immunofluorescence demonstrated increased PLOD2 expression in esophageal cancer cell lines TE-1 and Eca- 109, suggesting a connection to cell differentiation. (3) We successfully transfected fluorescently labeled PLOD2 siRNA into cells, achieving a transfection rate of 67.57% and silencing efficiency exceeding 80%. (4) Following transfection, we observed a decreased proliferation rate in PLOD2 siRNA-treated cells, indicating that PLOD2 reduction can slow esophageal cancer growth. These findings emphasize that PLOD2 plays a crucial role in esophageal cancer pathogenesis, particularly in low cell differentiation maintenance. It could serve as a promising target for inducing differentiation in esophageal cancer and evaluating its malignancy. The high PLOD2 expression in esophageal cancer cell lines suggests the presence of tumor stem cells. Moreover, reducing PLOD2 through RNAi technology slows cell proliferation, suggesting that inhibiting PLOD2 may offer a potential therapeutic approach for esophageal cancer treatment.

Chinese expert consensus on surgical continuous quality improvement goals in esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer (2024 edition)

Improving the quality and efficiency of surgical diagnosis and treatment guarantees the outcome for most patients with esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer, and the continuous quality improvement mechanism oriented to the "textbook outcome" is the best choice. To ensure the successful implementation of the "Quality Control Indicators for Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Cancer in China (2022 Version)" aligning with it more effectively is crucial. The Expert Committee on Quality Control of Esophageal Cancer at the National Cancer Center leads work teams comprised of multidisciplinary experts, particularly those in thoracic surgery, to establish a consensus. The current consensus comprises eight "textbook outcomes" to standardize, promote, and consolidate surgical quality management and continuously improve the surgical quality of esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer.

Analysis of the incidence and mortality trends of esophageal cancer in cancer registry areas of China and Japan.

This study aims to analyze the prevalence trend of esophageal cancer in Japan and China to provide suggestions for the prevention and treatment of esophageal cancer. The results showed that the incidence rate for the years 2010-2018 significantly decreased with an APC of 5.66%, and the mortality rate from 2010 to 2015 had an APC of -5.87% in China. However, the incidence rate of Japanese women showed an upward trend, with an APC of 4.09% from 2010 to 2019. The mortality rate of esophageal cancer in Japan showed a downward trend, with an APC of -2.96% from 2010 to 2021. From 2010 to 2018, Chinese esophageal squamous cell carcinoma accounted for the highest proportion, accounting for 85.96%, with the largest distribution in the middle, accounting for 47.25%. Patients are mostly diagnosed at stage III, and the relative survival rate from 2012 to 2015 was 30.3%. Japan also has the highest proportion of squamous cell carcinoma, and the lesions are also mostly located in the middle segment. While Japanese esophageal cancer patients are mostly diagnosed at stage I, and the relative survival rate was 41.5% in Japan from 2009 to 2011. The results of this article indicate that the current prevalence of esophageal cancer in China and Japan is generally declining, and the quality of life of patients is gradually improving, but effective screening and prevention strategies are still needed to reduce the burden of this disease.

A prospective single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase II study of sintilimab and anlotinib combined with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer.

Antiangiogenic treatment and immunochemotherapy effectively treat patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, there remains a dearth of studies concerning neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer. The study focused on patients with T2-4NxM0 resectable esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant treatment involved administering anlotinib (10 mg orally, once a day, 2 weeks on and 1 week off) for antiangiogenesis and sintilimab (200 mg) and chemotherapy for three cycles. Surgical treatment was performed 4-6 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle was completed. The primary endpoints assessed were pathological complete response (pCR) and safety. Out of the 34 screened patients, 17 were successfully enrolled in the study, and 14 completed the entire treatment process. The pCR was 35.3% (6/17). However, two patients experienced mortality. The occurring rate of grade 3 or higher complications after the surgery was 78.6% (11/14) according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Specifically, anastomotic leakage was observed in 57.1% (8/14) of the patients. Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the current regimen demonstrated improved pCR. However, it did not show significant improvement compared to immunochemotherapy. It is essential to exercise caution when using this treatment approach in patients with esophageal cancer as it might increase postoperative complications, especially anastomotic leakage.

Overall Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer and Clinical Complete Response after Radio Chemotherapy: Should a Watchful Waiting Strategy be the new Standard of Care?

Abstract Background The current standard of care for curative treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) consists of neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy (RCT) followed by resection. However, an organ-sparing approach with a watchful waiting (WW) strategy and resection only in case of cancer recurrence is gaining importance in patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after RCT. Nevertheless, data on overall survival, particularly in subgroups with and without tumor recurrence, is limited. Aims To compare overall survival (OS) rates in patients with cCR based on initial management and at time of recurrence. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients with EC and cCR to RCT between 01/2014 and 12/2021. OS- and disease-free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Of 96 patients with cCR after RCT, 45 underwent resection (47%), and 51 (53%) a WW approach. There were no significant differences in baseline patient or tumor characteristics. In the WW group, 28 patients (55%) had cancer recurrence. Of those, 11 patients (of 28, 39%) underwent either salvage esophagectomy or endoscopic submucosal dissection in curative intent. No significant difference in OS could be detected in patients with WW and either no recurrence or recurrence treated in curative intention (p=0.716). Further, OS was significantly longer in those patients than in patients with primary resection (p=0.031) and WW patients with recurrence and palliative treatment (p<0.001). (Fig 1). Conclusion In a WW concept for patients with EC and cCR after RCT, patients with cancer recurrence can achieve the same OS as patients without recurrence if treated in curative intention. Moreover, OS in both those patient groups was superior to that of patients undergoing direct resection after RCT, supporting a WW approach as at least safe and applicable in clinical practice. Further prospective data are needed to determine the value of WW as standard of care for patients with cCR following neoadjuvant RCT.

Pathological Complete Response after Radio Chemotherapy and Esophagectomy – false Sense of Security?

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer (EC) is associated with a high morbidity and mortality, even in a curative treatment approach. The current standard of care for curative treatment of EC consists of neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy (RCT) followed by resection. Pathological response in the resected tissue is a well-known predictor of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Yet, even in a pathological complete response (pCR), cancer recurrence is not infrequent. Aims To analyze DFS and OS in patients with pCR after trimodal therapy and identify risk factors for recurrence. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all patients with pathological complete response after RCT and esophagectomy treated for EC between 01/2014 and 12/2021. Clinical data such as demographic data, tumor characteristics at staging and restaging and postoperative follow-up, were extracted from electronic medical records. Results Of 28 patients, 10 (35.7%) developed cancer recurrence. There were no statistically significant differences in patient or tumor characteristics between patients with or without recurrence. Recurrence occurred after a median 21 months (IQR 30). Median OS was 40.5 months (IQR 40) in patients with and 48.5 months (IQR 32) in patients without recurrence (p=0.121). Recurrence was mostly distant (n = 9, 90%). 4 (of 10, 40%) patients were then addressed in curative, 6 (60%) in palliative intention. Predictive factors for cancer recurrence were persistent tumor in endosonography and/or computed tomography during restaging. Conclusion Even in patients with pCR after RCT and esophagectomy, around one third develops cancer recurrence. A tight follow-up with special attention to distant rather than local recurrence seems beneficial. Patients with an aspect of only partial response at restaging are at higher risk for recurrence and should be monitored even closer.

Tislelizumab (Tevimbra) for esophageal cancer.

The FDA has approved tislelizumab (Tevimbra – BeiGene), a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) blocking antibody, for treatment of unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer in adults who received prior systemic chemotherapy that did not include a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor.

International Expert Consensus on Semantics of Multimodal Esophageal Cancer Treatment: Delphi Study.

Recent developments in esophageal cancer treatment, including studies exploring active surveillance following chemoradiotherapy, have led to a need for clear terminology and definitions regarding different multimodal treatment options. The aim of this study was to reach worldwide consensus on the definitions and semantics of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment. In total, 72 experts working in the field of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment were invited to participate in this Delphi study. The study comprised three Delphi surveys sent out by email and one online meeting. Input for the Delphi survey consisted of terminology obtained from a systematic literature search. Participants were asked to respond to open questions and to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed with different statements. Consensus was reached when there was ≥75% agreement among respondents. Forty-nine of 72 invited experts (68.1%) participated in the first online Delphi survey, 45 (62.5%) in the second survey, 21 (46.7%) of 45 in the online meeting, and 39 (86.7%) of 45 in the final survey. Consensus on neoadjuvant and definitive chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery was reached for 27 of 31 items (87%). No consensus was reached on follow-up after treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Consensus was reached on most statements regarding terminology and definitions of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment. Implementing uniform criteria facilitates comparison of studies and promotes international research collaborations.

Assessing the benefits of repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a specialized center before gastric and esophageal cancer surgery.

The surgical treatment of gastric and esophageal cancer in Denmark is centralized in four specialized esophagogastric cancer (EGC) centers. Patients are referred after an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a secondary healthcare facility. The EGD is repeated at the specialized EGC center before determining a surgical treatment strategy. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the quality of EGDs performed at a secondary healthcare facility and evaluate the clinical value of repeated EGD at a specialized center when determining the surgical treatment strategy. Patients from three of the four centers, who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent from 1 June 2016 to 1 May 2021, were included. EGD reports from the referral facilities and EGC centers were compared based on a predefined checklist. Furthermore, endoscopist experience, the time between examinations, and histology were registered. Finally, it was assessed whether the specialized EGD led to any substantial changes in surgical treatment. Baseline characteristics and differences in EGD reports were described and McNemar's chi-square test was performed. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for a change in surgical strategy. The study included 953 patients who underwent both an initial EGD and EGD at referral to a specialized center. In 644 cases (68%), the information from the initial EGD was considered insufficient concerning preoperative tumor information. In 113 (12%) cases, the findings in the specialized EGD would lead to a significant alteration in the surgical strategy compared with the primary EGD. The findings suggest that repeated EGD at a specialized center is of clinical value and helps ensure proper surgical treatment for patients undergoing curative surgery for gastroesophageal cancer.

Alarmin S100A8 imparts chemoresistance of esophageal cancer by reprogramming cancer-associated fibroblasts.

Chemotherapy remains the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer. However, durable benefits are achieved by only a limited subset of individuals due to the elusive chemoresistance. Here, we utilize patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma to investigate chemoresistance mechanisms in preclinical settings. We observe that activated cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are enriched in the tumor microenvironment of PDXs resistant to chemotherapy. Mechanistically, we reveal that cancer-cell-derived S100A8 triggers the intracellular RhoA-ROCK-MLC2-MRTF-A pathway by binding to the CD147 receptor of CAFs, inducing CAF polarization and leading to chemoresistance. Therapeutically, we demonstrate that blocking the S100A8-CD147 pathway can improve chemotherapy efficiency. Prognostically, we found the S100A8 levels in peripheral blood can serve as an indicator of chemotherapy responsiveness. Collectively, our study offers a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying chemoresistance in esophageal cancer and highlights the potential value of S100A8 in the clinical management of esophageal cancer.

3-Epi-betulinic acid 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (eBAG) induces autophagy by activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in hepatocellular carcinoma

3-Epi-betulinic acid 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (eBAG) is a pentacyclic triterpene mainly distributed in food and medicinal plants, which exhibits various pharmacological properties. However, whether these functions are attributed to eBAG or additional components in these plants remain unknown. Herein, we report that eBAG exerted an inhibitory activity against hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal cancer cells. EBAG induced non-apoptotic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. The eBAG-induced cell death was inhibited by knock-down of autophagy related gene (ATG) 5 and ATG7, by administration of 3-methyladenine, a selective autophagy inhibitor that suppresses phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), and by chloroquine, a classic autophagy flux inhibitor. We demonstrated that eBAG induced an autophagy-mediated cell death. Application of eBAG mimicked cellular bioenergetics depletion leading to the reduction of intracellular ATP, activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and inhibition of mTOR. Co-treatment with compound C, an AMPK inhibitor, abrogated cell death induced by eBAG. We further validated the anti-tumor effect of eBAG in the murine xenograft model of hepatocellular carcinoma and found that eBAG treatment promoted the induction of autophagy and reduction of tumor growth in mice. As a functional food ingredient, eBAG is a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal cancer.

The efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer.

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the management of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. A total of 68 patients who underwent ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups based on whether the snare traction was used or not; the snare traction group (S-ESD, group n = 35) and the control group (C-ESD, group n = 33). There was no significant difference in the size of the resected area between the groups [21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm2 vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm2, P = 0.976]. The snare traction group had a shorter dissection time [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, P = 0.017] and a faster resection speed [0.28 ± 0.13 cm2/min vs 0.22 ± 0.11cm2/min, P = 0.040] compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, cost, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, bleeding rate, perforation rate, stricture rate, and recurrence rate (P > 0.05). Snare traction-assisted ESD is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Its advantages includes shorter procedure so the anesthesia requirement, clear operative filed view, improved mucosal dissection efficiency, simple, and easily accessible equipment.

A commentary on "Health-related quality of life trajectories up to 15 years after curative treatment for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study".

A commentary on "Health-related quality of life trajectories up to 15 years after curative treatment for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study".

A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-FU Followed by Surgical Resection in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction Cancer and Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

We conducted a phase II study evaluating chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer, using the docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen followed by surgery. The primary purposes of this clinical trial were to assess the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy employing the DCF regimen in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. We enrolled a total of 24 newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients between April 2015 and November 2017 in this prospective study. The radiotherapy regimen consisted of a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. The chemotherapy protocol included docetaxel 35 mg/m2 for 1 h on day 1 and day 29, cisplatin 35 mg/m2 for 1 h on day 1 and day 29, and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 for 24 h on day 1-4 and day 29-32. The patients who accepted the re-staging exam should undergo surgery in 4-8 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy. The primary endpoints of this study were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and the evaluation of hematologic toxicity. The study population had a median age of 55.5 years, ranging from 44 to 66, with over 90% of the patients being male. The 5-year DFS was 37.1%, and the 5-year OS was 48.7%. The pathologic complete response rate was 45.8% (11/24). The most common types of toxicity were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. No grade 3 or greater hematologic toxicity was reported. The use of the DCF regimen in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery demonstrated tolerable toxicity and achieved acceptable DFS and OS outcomes.

Aortoesophageal fistula due to esophageal cancer: a case report of successful management

BackgroundAortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. The best treatment for the AEF due to esophageal carcinoma is still unresolved. Here, we report a rare case of AEF caused by esophageal cancer, that was successfully treated with emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), followed by esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction.Case presentationA 64-year-old man presented with loss of consciousness and hypotension during chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Enhanced computed tomography showed extravasation from the descending aorta into the esophagus at the tumor site. We performed emergency TEVAR for the AEF, which stabilized the hemodynamics. We then performed thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy on day 4 after TEVAR to prevent graft infection, followed by gastric tube reconstruction on day 30 after TEVAR. At 9 months after the onset of AEF, the patient continues to receive outpatient chemotherapy and leads a normal daily life.ConclusionTEVAR is a useful hemostatic procedure for AEF. If the patient is in good condition and can continue treatment for esophageal cancer, esophagectomy and reconstruction after TEVAR should be performed to prevent graft infection and maintain quality of life.

Systemic inflammation score as a predictor of death within one year after esophagectomy.

After radical resection for esophageal cancer, death within 1year of surgery can occur due both to recurrence and to other diseases, even after postoperative complications have been overcome. This study identified risk factors for early death within 1year of esophagectomy for reasons other than death in hospital in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer or esophagogastric junction cancer. We reviewed 366 patients who underwent esophagectomy without adjuvant treatment between January 2009 and July 2022 for thoracic esophageal cancer or esophagogastric junction cancer. Patients who died within 1year excluding in-hospital death were compared with those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of death within 1year after surgery. Death within 1year occurred in 32 of 366 patients, 24 from primary disease and 8 from other diseases. Deaths within 1year were significantly older than the other cases, had significantly lower % vital capacity (%VC), and occurred significantly more often in cases in advanced stages of disease. In a multivariable analysis, a systemic inflammation score (SIS) based on serum albumin level and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio was identified as an independent predictor of death within 1year. As SIS increased, %VC decreased significantly, and CRP level and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio increased significantly. There was no relationship between SIS and pN. Death within 1year increased as SIS increased (p = 0.001 for trend). SIS assessment undertaken before beginning esophageal cancer treatment is a useful predictor of death within 1year of surgery.

Reniformin A suppresses non-small cell lung cancer progression by inducing TLR4/NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis

Pyroptosis is an inflammatory form of programmed cell death that plays an important role in regulating tumor progression. Reniformin A (RA) is a natural compound isolated from the medicinal herb Isodon excisoides that has been applied as folk medicine in the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, whether RA has an individual function in cancer and the molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we show that in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RA inhibits tumor growth by functioning as a pyroptosis inducer to promote TLR4/NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD axis. Specially, RA treatment increased Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) protein expression level by enhancing the TLR4 stability. Based on the molecular docking, we identified that RA directly bound to TLR4 to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and promote pyroptosis in A549 cells. Moreover, TLR4 is essential for RA-induced pyroptosis, and loss of TLR4 abolished RA-induced pyroptosis and further reduced the inhibitory effect of RA on NSCLC. In vivo experiments confirmed that RA inhibited the growth of lung tumors in mice by affecting pyroptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, TLR4 knockdown abolished RA-induced pyroptosis and inhibited the effect of RA chemotherapy in vivo. In conclusion, we propose that RA has a significant anticancer effect in NSCLC by inducing TLR4/NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis, which may provide a potential strategy for the treatment of NSCLC.

Esophageal cancer screening, early detection and treatment: Current insights and future directions.

Esophageal cancer ranks among the most prevalent malignant tumors globally, primarily due to its highly aggressive nature and poor survival rates. According to the 2020 global cancer statistics, there were approximately 604000 new cases of esophageal cancer, resulting in 544000 deaths. The 5-year survival rate hovers around a mere 15%-25%. Notably, distinct variations exist in the risk factors associated with the two primary histological types, influencing their worldwide incidence and distribution. Squamous cell carcinoma displays a high incidence in specific regions, such as certain areas in China, where it meets the cost-effectiveness criteria for widespread endoscopy-based early diagnosis within the local population. Conversely, adenocarcinoma (EAC) represents the most common histological subtype of esophageal cancer in Europe and the United States. The role of early diagnosis in cases of EAC originating from Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains a subject of controversy. The effectiveness of early detection for EAC, particularly those arising from BE, continues to be a debated topic. The variations in how early-stage esophageal carcinoma is treated in different regions are largely due to the differing rates of early-stage cancer diagnoses. In areas with higher incidences, such as China and Japan, early diagnosis is more common, which has led to the advancement of endoscopic methods as definitive treatments. These techniques have demonstrated remarkable efficacy with minimal complications while preserving esophageal functionality. Early screening, prompt diagnosis, and timely treatment are key strategies that can significantly lower both the occurrence and death rates associated with esophageal cancer.

Treatment and Rehabilitation for Esophageal Cancer—Striving to Meet Obstacles and Long-term Impacts

Background Following esophagogastric cancer treatment, patients with esophageal cancer and their relatives struggle with adjusting to a new everyday life as they experience various challenges after treatment requiring rehabilitation. Health professionals must address long-term impacts on patients’ health, everyday life, family functioning, and support needs. Objective This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore patients’, relatives’, and health professionals’ experience with long-term impacts and rehabilitation after treatment for esophageal cancer. Methods A qualitative approach based on a phenomenological-hermeneutical methodology was used. Two methods were selected in the study: focus group interviews with health professionals and individual interviews with patients and relatives. Inductive thematic analysis with inspiration from Braun and Clarke was used for data analysis. Results Three main themes emerged from the data analysis: (1) forced into limitations in everyday life, (2) learning and navigating a new everyday life, and (3) rehabilitation accepting new normality. Conclusion Patients and relatives experience persistent long-term impacts after treatment for esophageal cancer, making rehabilitation strenuous and demanding. Relatives take considerable responsibility for the patients’ rehabilitation but feel invisible and unsupported by health professionals. Health professionals acknowledge the severity of long-term impacts but fail to prepare patients and relatives for the impacts and do not see the relatives’ need for support. Implications for Practice The study emphasizes the need for a proactive approach in the healthcare system, addressing patients’ and relatives’ physical and psychological vulnerability. Cancer nurses need to prepare and involve patients and relatives in treatment, long-term impacts, and rehabilitation.

Larynx Preservation Treatment Strategies Seen in a National Survey of Cervical Esophageal Cancer Treatment

Larynx Preservation Treatment Strategies Seen in a National Survey of Cervical Esophageal Cancer Treatment