Treatment Of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research Articles

Modified Tracheal Traction Exercise Reduces the Incidence of Dysphagia in Patients with Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Dysphagia, an impairment in swallowing, is a frequent and debilitating complication for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), a common surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of modified tracheal traction exercise (MTTE) in alleviating postoperative dysphagia and improving clinical outcomes for these patients. A cohort of 143 patients underwent multilevel fusions, equally distributed between MTTE (n = 75) and traditional tracheal traction exercise (TTTE) (n = 68) groups. Demographic parity was observed in gender distribution, age averages (MTTE: 51.43 ± 11.25 years; TTTE: 52.35 ± 10.43 years), body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, fusion segments, and preoperative hospitalization days. Surgical duration differences were assessed. Clinical outcomes, dysphagia incidence, blood loss, postoperative complications, Cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association (c-JOA) scores, and functional outcome swallowing scale evaluations were conducted. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore factors influencing dysphagia. Modified tracheal traction exercise demonstrated advantages with a significantly lower dysphagia incidence (25.33% vs. 44.12%, p = 0.018), reduced blood loss (102.03 ± 17.04 vs. 113.46 ± 14.92, p < 0.001), shorter surgical durations (159.04 ± 9.82 vs. 164.41 ± 12.22 min, p = 0.004), and fewer postoperative complications (choking cough, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and hoarseness). Postoperative c-JOA scores at 2 and 6 weeks favored MTTE, but no significant differences were observed at 12 and 24 weeks. Functional outcome swallowing scale evaluations favored MTTE with significantly higher percentages of "normal" and lower incidences of "mild" and "moderate dysphagia" at various postoperative intervals compared to TTTE. Factors significantly associated with dysphagia included MTTE, age, and BMI according to logistic regression analyses. Modified tracheal traction exercise demonstrates superior short-term outcomes in multilevel ACDF, showcasing reduced dysphagia incidence, blood loss, and specific postoperative complications. Notably, factors contributing to dysphagia, including operation technique and patient-related variables, emphasize the significance of MTTE and patient characteristics in optimizing postoperative outcomes in multilevel ACDF procedures.

Pharmacological Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Critical Review of Current Evidence.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults, representing substantial morbidity and significant financial and resource burdens. Typically, patients with progressive DCM will eventually receive surgical treatment. Nonetheless, despite advancements in pharmacotherapeutics, evidence for pharmacological therapy remains limited. Health professionals from various fields would find interest in pharmacological agents that could benefit patients with mild DCM or enhance surgical outcomes. This review aims to consolidate all clinical and experimental evidence on the pharmacological treatment of DCM. We conducted a comprehensive narrative review that presents all pharmacological agents that have been investigated for DCM treatment in both humans and animal models. Riluzole exhibits effectiveness solely in rat models, but not in treating mild DCM in humans. Cerebrolysin emerges as a potential neuroprotective agent for myelopathy in animals but had contradictory results in clinical trials. Limaprost alfadex demonstrates motor function improvement in animal models and exhibits promising outcomes in a small clinical trial. Glucocorticoids not only fail to provide clinical benefits but may also lead to adverse events. Cilostazol, anti-Fas ligand antibody, and Jingshu Keli display promise in animal studies, while erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and limaprost alfadex exhibit potential in both animal and human research. Existing evidence mainly rests on weak clinical data and animal experimentation. Current pharmacological efforts target ion channels, stem cell differentiation, inflammatory, vascular, and apoptotic pathways. The inherent nature and pathogenesis of DCM offer substantial prospects for developing neurodegenerative or neuroprotective therapies capable of altering disease progression, potentially delaying surgical intervention, and optimizing outcomes for those undergoing surgical decompression.

Neuroprotection and Neuroregeneration of the Injured Spinal Cord: A Focus on Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy - Commentary on "Pharmacological Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Critical Review of Current Evidence".

Neuroprotection and Neuroregeneration of the Injured Spinal Cord: A Focus on Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy - Commentary on "Pharmacological Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Critical Review of Current Evidence".

Updates in current concepts in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

The incidence of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) has increased over the years due to an increasing aging population, yet there is a dearth of recent comprehensive data evaluating the multiple facets of this degenerative condition. Recent publications have highlighted the biochemistry and biomechanics of DCM, which are paramount to understanding the degenerative nature of the condition and selecting the most optimal treatment options for improved patient outcomes. In addition, there have been recent studies establishing the superiority of surgical to non-surgical treatments for DCM, which until now was a poorly substantiated claim that has permeated the medical field for decades. The authors of this systematic review sought to collect and assess available high quality peer reviewed data to analyze the nature of DCM and gain a better understanding for its treatment choices. PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched on January 19, 2023 with date restrictions of 2015-2023 imposed. For initial data collection, five independent searches were completed using the following keywords: pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of DCM; cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and DCM recent developments; management and treatment for CSM and DCM; diagnosis and management of DCM; and pathophysiology of DCM. The results were screened for their application to DCM; any study that did not directly address DCM were identified and removed through abstract assessment, such studies included those pertaining to alternative fields including cardiology and psychiatry. Studies found relevant through full-text assessment and those published in English were included in this study and unpublished studies and studies found irrelevant based on titles and keywords were excluded from this study. The 115 articles that met criteria were critically appraised independently by the 2 reviewers and the principles of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) were applied to assess the quality of evidence from each study. A total of 352 studies resulted from the original search. There were 71 duplicate articles that were removed and a total of 281 articles were screened. 166 articles were then removed based on the exclusion/inclusion criteria, title, and abstract. Of the 138 articles that remained, a final list of 115 articles was created based on the reporting measures. DCM is a multifactorial disease that has the potential to impair neurological function and cause significant paralysis. Although the multiple facets of this disease have not been fully elucidated, there have been significant breakthroughs in understanding the mechanisms involved in this disease process. The use of complex imaging modalities, genetic sequencing, biomarkers, and pharmacological agents has provided insight into the factors involved in the progression of DCM, which has consequently cultivated more refined approaches for diagnosis and treatment of DCM.

Clinical results after surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a retrospective 1-year follow-up descriptive analysis

Background Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) poses a significant challenge globally, often requiring surgical intervention for moderate to severe cases. Choosing between anterior and posterior surgical approaches remains controversial, highlighting the need to consider various factors such as sagittal balance and compression severity. Methods This retrospective cohort study described patients with DCM who underwent surgery at Carlos Van Buren Hospital between 2014 and 2021. Inclusion criteria involved clinical evidence of myelopathy and cervical spinal cord compression at two or more levels, with data collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 12 months. Results Of the 66 patients analyzed, both anterior and posterior approaches demonstrated substantial clinical improvements postoperatively, with 83% of patients showing overall improvement and 59.1% achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in mJOA scores. Notably, anterior surgeries showed slightly higher rates of MCID achievement and fewer instances of disease progression postoperatively compared to posterior surgeries. Conclusions Our descriptive findings underscore the benefits of both anterior and posterior surgical approaches for DCM, with slight outcome variations. Individualized treatment, considering factors such as clinical symptoms, compression type, and cervical alignment, is crucial. Future research should prioritize comprehensive outcome measures to inform treatment strategies.

Cost-effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy in the United Kingdom

Purpose Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the commonest cause of adult spinal cord dysfunction worldwide, for which surgery is the mainstay of treatment. At present, there is limited literature on the costs associated with the surgical management of DCM, and none from the United Kingdom (UK). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DCM surgery within the National Health Service, UK. Materials and Methods Incidence of DCM was identified from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database for a single year using five ICD-10 diagnostic codes to represent DCM. Health Resource Group (HRG) data was used to estimate the mean incremental surgery (treatment) costs compared to non-surgical care, and the incremental effect (quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain) was based on data from a previous study. A cost per QALY value of <£30,000/QALY (GBP) was considered acceptable and cost-effective, as per the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance. A sensitivity analysis was undertaken (±5%, ±10% and ±20%) to account for variance in both the cost of admission and QALY gain. Results The total number of admissions for DCM in 2018 was 4,218. Mean age was 62 years, with 54% of admissions being of working age (18–65 years). The overall estimated cost of admissions for DCM was £38,871,534 for the year. The mean incremental (per patient) cost of surgical management of DCM was estimated to be £9,216 (ranged £2,358 to £9,304), with a QALY gain of 0.64, giving an estimated cost per QALY value of £14,399/QALY. Varying the QALY gain by ±20%, resulted in cost/QALY figures between £12,000 (+20%) and £17,999 (−20%). Conclusions Surgery is estimated to be a cost-effective treatment of DCM amongst the UK population.

Use Of Diffusion Tensor Tractography as an Adjunct In The Diagnosis and Support in the Timely Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Use Of Diffusion Tensor Tractography as an Adjunct In The Diagnosis and Support in the Timely Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the Geriatric Patient Population: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 2010-2020.

Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2020. To compare the short-term complication rates of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical laminoplasty (LP), and posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCF) in a geriatric population. The geriatric population in the United States has increased significantly. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is caused by cervical spinal stenosis, and its prevalence increases with age. Therefore, the incidence of multilevel DCM requiring surgical intervention is likely to increase. ACDF, LP, and PCF are the most commonly used surgical techniques for treating multilevel DCM. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical technique for the decompression of DCM in geriatric patients. Patients aged 65 years who had undergone either multilevel ACDF, LP, or PCF for the treatment of DCM were analyzed. Additional analysis was performed by standardizing the data for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification scores and preoperative functional status. A total of 23,129 patients were identified. Patients with ACDF were younger, more often female, and preoperatively healthier than those in the other two groups. The estimated postoperative mortality and morbidity, mean operation time, and length of hospital stay were the lowest for ACDF, second lowest for LP, and highest for PCF. The readmission and reoperation rates were comparable between ACDF and LP; however, both were significantly lower than PCF. PCF is associated with the highest risk of mortality, morbidity, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned readmission in the short-term postoperative period in patients aged 65 years. In contrast, ACDF carries the lowest risk. However, some disease-specific factors may require posterior treatment. For these cases, LP should be included in the preoperative discussion when determining the ideal surgical approach for geriatric patients.

Development of the cervical myelopathy severity index: a new patient reported outcome measure to quantify impairments and functional limitations

Background ContextExisting degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) severity scales have significant shortcomings, creating a strong impetus for the development of a practical measurement tool with sound psychometric properties. PurposeThis work reports the item generation and reduction of the Cervical Myelopathy Severity Index (CMSI), a new DCM patient-reported outcome measure of symptoms and functional limitations. DesignProspective observational study. Patient SampleAdult DCM patients belonging to one of three distinct treatment groups: (1) observation cohort, (2) preoperative surgical cohort, (3) 6 to 12 months postoperative cohort. Outcome MeasuresPatient-reported outcome measure of symptoms and functional limitations. MethodsItem generation was performed using semi-structured patient focus groups emphasizing symptoms experienced and functional limitations. Readability was assessed through think-aloud patient interviews. Item reduction involved surveys of DCM patients with a spectrum of disease severity and board-certified spine surgeons experienced in the treatment of DCM. A priori criteria for item removal included: patient median importance/severity <2 (of 4), 30% or more no severity (response of zero), item severity correlations ≤ 0.80 (Spearman), item severity reliability (weighted kappa <0.60) based on a 2-week interval and clinician median importance <2 with retention of items with very high clinical importance. ResultsThere were 42 items generated from a combination of specialist input and patient focus groups. Items captured sensorimotor symptoms and limitations related to upper and lower extremities as well as sphincter dysfunction. Ninety-eight patients (43, 30, 25 observation, pre- and postsurgery respectively) and 51 surgeons completed the assessment. Twenty-three items remained after application of median importance and severity thresholds and weighted kappa cutoffs. After elimination of highly correlated (>0.80) items and combining two similar items, the final CMSI questionnaire list included 14 items. ConclusionsThe CMSI is a new DCM patient-reported clinical measurement tool developed using patient and clinician input to inform item generation and reduction. Future work will evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the CMSI in relation to existing myelopathy measurement indices.

Subclinical respiratory dysfunction and impaired ventilatory adaptation in degenerative cervical myelopathy

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a debilitating neurological condition characterized by chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord leading to impaired upper and lower limb function. Despite damage to areas of the cervical spinal cord that house the respiratory network, respiratory dysfunction is not a common symptom of DCM. However, DCM may be associated with respiratory dysfunction, and this can affect the ventilatory response to respiratory challenges during emergence from anesthesia, exercise, or pulmonary disease. Surgical spinal cord decompression, which is the primary treatment for DCM, leads to improved sensorimotor function in DCM; yet its impact on respiratory function is unknown. Here, using a clinically relevant model of DCM, we evaluate respiratory function during disease progression and assess adaptive ventilation to hypercapnic challenge before and after surgical intervention. We show that despite significant and progressive forelimb and locomotor deficits, there was no significant decline in eupneic ventilation from the early to late phases of spinal cord compression. Additionally, for the first time, we demonstrate that despite normal ventilation under resting conditions, DCM impairs acute adaptive ventilatory ability in response to hypercapnia. Remarkably, akin to DCM patients, surgical decompression treatment improved sensorimotor function in a subset of mice. In contrast, none of the mice that underwent surgical decompression recovered their ability to respond to hypercapnic ventilatory challenge. These findings underscore the impact of chronic spinal cord compression on respiratory function, highlighting the challenges associated with ventilatory response to respiratory challenges in individuals with DCM. This research highlights the impact of cervical spinal cord compression on respiratory dysfunction in DCM, as well as the persistence of adaptive ventilatory dysfunction after surgical spinal cord decompression. These results indicate the need for additional interventions to enhance recovery of respiratory function after surgery for DCM.

Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Four Different Fixation Systems: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the classic procedure for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Cage with plate (CP), polyetheretherketone cage alone (PCA), ROI-C and Zero-P are the most widely used fixation systems in ACDF. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal system for ACDF. Purpose: A comprehensive analysis to show which of the CP, PCA, ROI-C and Zero-P after ACDF has the best clinical efficacy and the most reliable safety. Methods: We searched the Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane library up to the date of February 13th, 2021. Studies included relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies with a comparison of different fixation systems among CP, PCA, ROI-C and Zero-P were identified. Results: We screened 43 trials eligible, including 3045 patients. No significant differences were found in the NDI score. PCA has shown a significantly less recovery of cervical lordosis than CP and Zero-P. For the non-fusion rate, PCA was significantly higher than CP. PCA had a significantly higher subsidence rate than CP and Zero-P, and ROI-C was also significantly higher than CP. For the incidence of complications, CP was significantly higher than the others. The surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) for NDI score improvement was: SSC, PCA, and CP. ROI-C, Zero-P, PCA, and CP; for cervical lordosis recovery: CP, Zero-P, ROI-C, and PCA; for non-fusion rate: PCA, Zero-P, ROI-C, and CP; for subsidence rate: PCA, ROI-C, Zero-P, and CP; for complications: CP, PCA, ROI-C, and Zero-P. Conclusion: Despite the third-ranking spectrums of fusion rate, Zero-P still could be recommended for its second-ranking spectrums of the NDI score improvement efficacy, cervical lordosis recovery, and reduction of subsidence rate, with the least ranking of complications. Registration: The number of PROSPERO is CRD42021230735 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treating multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy

BackgroundLaminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common posterior decompression procedures used to treat multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). There is debate on their relative efficacy and safety for treatment of DCM. The goal of this study is to examine outcomes and costs of LF and LP procedures for DCM. MethodsThis is a retrospective review of adult patients (<18) at a single center who underwent elective LP and LF of at least 3 levels from C3-C7. Outcome measures included operative characteristics, inpatient mobility status, length of stay, complications, revision surgery, VAS neck pain scores, and changes in radiographic alignment. Oral opioid analgesic needs and hospital cost comparison were also assessed. ResultsLP cohort (n=76) and LF cohort (n=59) reported no difference in neck pain at baseline, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (p>.05). Patients were successfully weaned off opioids at similar rates (LF: 88%, LP: 86%). Fixed and variable costs respectively with LF cases hospital were higher, 15.7% and 25.7% compared to LP cases (p=.03 and p<.001). LF has a longer length of stay (4.2 vs. 3.1 days, p=.001). Wound-related complications were 5 times more likely after LF (13.6% vs. 5.9%, RR: 5.15) and C5 palsy rates were similar across the groups (LF: 11.9% LP: 5.6% RR: 1.8). Ground-level falls requiring an emergency department visit were more likely after LF (11.9% vs. 2.6%, p=.04). ConclusionsWhen treating multilevel DCM, LP has similar rates of new or increasing axial neck pain compared to LF. LF was associated with greater hospital costs, length of stay, and complications compared to LP. LP may in fact be a less morbid and more cost-effective alternative to LF for patients without cervical deformity.

Return to work after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a nationwide registry-based observational study

BackgroundFew studies of high quality exist on return to work (RTW) rate after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). This study aims to examine the RTW rate in patients undergoing surgery for DCM.MethodsNationwide prospectively collected data were obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery and the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. The primary outcome was return to work, defined as being at work at a given time postoperatively without any medical income-compensation benefits. Secondary endpoints included the neck disability index (NDI) and quality of life measured by EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D).ResultsAmong 439 patients operated for DCM between 2012 and 2018, 20% of the patients received a medical income-compensation benefit one year before surgery. This number increased steadily towards the operation at which timepoint 100% received benefits. By 12 months after surgery, 65% had returned to work. By 36 months, 75% had returned to work. Patients that returned to work were more likely to be non-smokers and to have a college education. They had less comorbidity, more were without benefit 1-year pre-surgery, and significantly more patients were employed at operation date. Average days of sick leave in the year before surgery were significantly less in the RTW group, and they had a significantly lower baseline NDI and EQ-5D All PROMs reached statistical significance at 12 months, in favor of the group that achieved RTW.ConclusionAt 12 months following surgery, 65% had returned to work. At the end of the 36-month follow-up period, 75% had returned to work, 5% less than the working percentage in the beginning of the follow-up period. This study demonstrates that a large percentage of patients return to work after surgical treatment for DCM.

Are Functional Gains Durable After Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Myelopathy?: Commentary on an article by Victor Hin Ting Yick, MBBS, et al.: "Neurological Survivorship Following Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. A Longitudinal Study on 195 Patients".

Commentary In degenerative cervical myelopathy, spine surgeons generally accept the concept that patients will show clinically meaningful improvement after spinal cord decompression. At a minimum, the spine literature and common sense support the notion that cord decompression will at least halt ongoing neurological deterioration. Surgeons may debate the best method of decompression (anterior or posterior) and whether decompression with fusion is necessary, but there is little dissension with regard to the need for a surgical procedure in the setting of moderate to severe myelopathy1. The extent to which early neurological improvement after the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy is sustained in the long term is unknown. Using the concept of neurological survivorship and Kaplan-Meier curves, Yick et al. demonstrate that, although most patients improve after decompressive surgery, not all of these good early results are durable. The authors found that as many as 17.9% of patients will see a recurrent decline in neurological function by 10 years, and most of these patients who underwent failed treatment (74.3%) underwent a revision surgical procedure. Given the published high reoperation rates in cervical spine surgery, these results in degenerative cervical myelopathy are not particularly surprising. In a recent minimum 10-year follow-up of anterior cervical fusion in 159 patients, Buttermann reported a 31% reoperation rate2. In the current study, Yick et al. confirm what smaller, short-term studies have suggested: improvement after decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy is fleeting in many patients and reoperation is common. Such knowledge is valuable when counseling patients both before and after the surgical procedure. In addition to describing the neurological survivorship of these patients, Yick et al. drilled down on the risk factors for failure. Some of these significant risk factors are patient-specific and are not controllable by the surgeon. These factors include renal failure and spinal cord signal change on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences. A cord signal change, associated with cellular changes in the cord secondary to severe cord compression, is often irreversible3 and, as seen in the current study, is associated with ongoing declines in neurological function. Other significant risk factors are modifiable. Surgeons can use these factors to modify their surgical management of cervical myelopathy and, hopefully, improve future neurological survivorship. First, and most importantly, surgeons should not be performing suture laminoplasty. Patients treated with this technique had the worst neurological survivorship (31.2%) and tended to experience treatment failure early after the surgical procedure. Second, patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament did best when decompression was combined with fusion. Surgeons should give strong consideration to including fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament to improve outcomes. Conversely, surgeons might consider avoidance of fusion in younger patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. The top risk factor for late neurological decline was adjacent-level stenosis, proximal or distal to a fusion construct. In these patients, perhaps a posterior decompression without fusion or a laminoplasty with plating will result in better neurological survivorship. Yick et al. should be commended for their efforts to publish longer-term neurological outcomes for this complex group of patients. The strengths of the study include a large cohort of 195 patients and a mean follow-up of 76 months. The weaknesses of the study include a retrospective design with many patients (49) excluded because of incomplete follow-up. Furthermore, many of the included patients (37) had a follow-up period shorter than 2 years. Nevertheless, Yick et al. identify important predictive factors for neurological survivorship after surgical treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy and give surgeons specific pearls to help with surgical planning. A long-term prospective study with a minimum 10-year follow-up is still necessary to define optimal surgical approaches for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Prognostic Factors for the Postoperative Improvement of Spinal Cord-Related Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

The number of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) requiring surgical treatment has markedly increased in today's aging society. Such patients often exhibit impaired activities of daily living because of motor dysfunction as well as neuropathic pain (NeP). Although many studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment for DCM, residual postoperative NeP has not been well described. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the predictors of postoperative NeP improvement in patients with DCM. This retrospective study included 92 outpatients with postoperative chronic NeP (≥3 months) related to DCM. Data were obtained from clinical information, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and patient-based questionnaires using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) and the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for patients with NPSI improvement rates <30% and ≥30% to identify prognostic factors. Among 92 patients, 61 (66.3%) had residual NeP, with a low improvement rate even after surgery. The independent negative prognostic factors for NeP improvement after surgery were older age at operation (odds ratio (OR): 0.932), longer symptom duration before surgery (OR: 0.589), and higher preoperative NPSI score (OR: 0.932). The cut-off value of symptom duration before surgery for postoperative NeP improvement was 1 year. By contrast, the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and MRI findings, including signal intensity change and the degree of spinal cord compression, were not associated with postoperative NeP improvement. Moreover, even in patients with an NPSI improvement rate ≥30%, the NPSI subscores for deep pain and paresthesia/dysesthesia remained high. Discrepancies between physician- and image-based assessments and patient-based assessments were identified as factors associated with improvement in postoperative NeP. Our findings are important for both spine surgeons and patients to manage patient expectations with respect to recovery during the postoperative course.

Evaluating a paradigm shift from anterior decompression and fusion to muscle-preserving selective laminectomy: a single-center study of degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Muscle-preserving selective laminectomy (SL) is an alternative to conventional decompression surgery in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). It is less invasive, preserves the extensor musculature, and maintains the range of motion of the cervical spine. Therefore, the preferred treatment for DCM at the authors' institution has changed from anterior decompression and fusion (ADF), including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), toward SL. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes before and after this paradigm shift with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, reoperations, and cost-effectiveness. This study was a retrospective register-based cohort study. All patients with DCM who underwent ADF or SL at the authors' institution from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed. Using ANCOVA, changes in PROMs from baseline to the 2-year follow-up were compared between the two groups, adjusting for clinicodemographic parameters, baseline PROMs, number of decompressed levels, and MRI measurements (C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA], and modified K-line interval [mK-line INT]). The PROMs, including the European Myelopathy Score (EMS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the EQ-5D, were collected from the national Swedish Spine Register. Complications, reoperations, and in-hospital treatment costs were also compared between the two groups. Ninety patients (mean age 60.7 years, 51 men [57%]) were included in the ADF group and 63 patients (mean age 68.8 years, 41 men [65%]) in the SL group. The ADF and SL groups had similar PROMs at baseline. The preoperative MR images showed similar C2-7 Cobb angles (10.7° [ADF] vs 14.1° [SL], p = 0.12) and mK-line INTs (4.08 vs 4.88 mm, p = 0.07), but different C2-7 SVA values (16.2 vs 19.3 mm, p = 0.04). The comparison of ANCOVA-adjusted mean changes in PROMs from baseline to the 2-year follow-up presented no significant differences between the groups (EMS, p = 0.901; NDI, p = 0.639; EQ-5D, p = 0.378; and EQ-5D health, p = 0.418). The overall complication rate was twice as high in the ADF group (22.2% vs 9.5%, p = 0.049), while the reoperation rate was comparable (16.7% vs 7.9%, p = 0.146). The average in-hospital treatment cost per patient was $6617 (USD) for SL, $7046 for ACDF, and $12,000 for ACCF. SL provides similar PROMs after 2 years, a significantly lower complication rate, and better cost-effectiveness compared with ADF.

Contribution of dynamic cervical MRI to surgical planning for degenerative cervical myelopathy: Revision rate and clinical outcomes at 5 years’ postoperative

IntroductionCervical MRI is the gold standard for surgical planning of degenerative cervical myelopathy; however, the symptomatic postoperative recurrence rate is high in the medium and long terms (9.1% to 10.7%) and may bring into question the quality of the preoperative surgical plan. The objective of this study was to evaluate cervical spinal stenosis and intramedullary hyperintensity with dynamic cervical MRI to determine the recurrence rate and clinical improvement in a cohort of patients who had dynamic cervical MRI incorporated into their surgical plan. MethodsThis was a prospective, single-center study. Upon enrolment and at each follow-up visit, patients completed the mJOA score, NDI, cervical pain on visual analog scale (VAS) and radicular pain on VAS. Every enrolled patient underwent dynamic cervical MRI (in neutral, flexion and extension positions). Five levels were measured in the three positions, resulting in 915 levels for analysis. ResultsSixty-one patients were included. Eighty-four levels had an intramedullary hyperintensity in neutral position, 93 in extension and 112 in flexion. The mean sagittal diameter varied the most at C4-C5, going from 7.13mm (SD 2.32) on average in neutral to 6.30mm (SD 2.22) in extension and 8.29mm (SD 2.10) in flexion, a variation of –12% and +16%, respectively. A Mühle grade≥2 was found in 134 levels in neutral position versus 189 in extension and 110 in flexion. None of the patients had worse neurological symptoms following the dynamic cervical MRI. The mean postoperative follow-up was 4.4 years (SD 0.88). Two patients (3.1%) required surgical revision because the implants had shifted. One patient developed symptomatic adjacent segment disease. ConclusionPreoperative surgical planning that incorporates dynamic cervical MRI before the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy appears to be a safe and reliable method and one that helps reduce symptoms in the long term. Level of evidenceIV.

Differences in postoperative quality of life in young, early elderly, and late elderly patients undergoing surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common progressive spine disorder affecting predominantly middle-aged and elderly populations. With increasing life expectancy, the incidence of CSM is expected to rise further. The outcomes of elderly patients undergoing CSM surgery and especially their quality of life (QOL) postoperatively remain undetermined. This study retrospectively reviewed patients to identify baseline differences and validated postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in elderly patients undergoing CSM surgery. The multi-institutional, neurosurgery-specific NeuroPoint Quality Outcomes Database was queried to identify CSM patients treated surgically at the 14 highest-volume sites from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: young (< 65 years), early elderly (65-74 years), and late elderly (≥ 75 years). Demographic and PRO measures (Neck Disability Index [NDI] score, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] score, EQ-5D score, EQ-5D visual analog scale [VAS] score, arm pain VAS, and neck pain VAS) were compared among the groups at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 1151 patients were identified: 691 patients (60%) in the young, 331 patients (28.7%) in the early elderly, and 129 patients (11.2%) in the late elderly groups. At baseline, younger patients presented with worse NDI scores (p < 0.001) and lower EQ-5D VAS (p = 0.004) and EQ-5D (p < 0.001) scores compared with early and late elderly patients. No differences among age groups were found in the mJOA score. An improvement of all QOL scores was noted in all age groups. On unadjusted analysis at 3 months, younger patients had greater improvement in arm pain VAS, NDI, and EQ-5D VAS compared with early and late elderly patients. At 12 months, the same changes were seen, but on adjusted analysis, there were no differences in PROs between the age groups. The authors' results indicate that elderly patients undergoing CSM surgery achieved QOL outcomes that were equivalent to those of younger patients at the 12-month follow-up.

Application of electrophysiological measures in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is one of the leading causes of progressive spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly. Early diagnosis and treatment of DCM are essential to avoid permanent disability. The pathophysiology of DCM includes chronic ischemia, destruction of the blood–spinal cord barrier, demyelination, and neuronal apoptosis. Electrophysiological studies including electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction study (NCS), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are useful in detecting the presymptomatic pathological changes of the spinal cord, and thus supplementing the early clinical and radiographic examinations in the management of DCM. Preoperatively, they are helpful in detecting DCM and ruling out other diseases, assessing the spinal cord compression level and severity, predicting short- and long-term prognosis, and thus deciding the treatment methods. Intra- and postoperatively, they are also useful in monitoring neurological function change during surgeries and disease progression during follow-up rehabilitation. Here, we reviewed articles from 1979 to 2021, and tried to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of electrophysiological examinations in DCM. With this review, we aim to equip spinal surgeons with the basic knowledge to diagnosis and treat DCM using ancillary electrophysiological tests.

Long-term functional outcome of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a major global cause of spinal cord dysfunction. Surgical treatment is considered a safe and effective way to improve functional outcome, although information about long-term functional outcome remains scarce despite increasing longevity. The objective of this study was to describe functional outcome 10 years after surgery for DCM. A prospective observational cohort study was undertaken in a university-affiliated neurosurgery department. All patients who underwent surgery for DCM between 2008 and 2010 as part of the multicenter Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy International trial were included. Participants were approached for additional virtual assessment 10 years after surgery. Functional outcome was assessed according to the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA; scores 0-18) score at baseline and 1, 2, and 10 years after surgery. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as 1-, 2-, or 3-point improvement for mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy, respectively. Outcome was considered durable when stabilization or improvement after 2 years was maintained at 10 years. Self-evaluated effect of surgery was assessed using a 4-point Likert-like scale. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were compared between groups that worsened and improved or remained stable using descriptive statistics. Functional outcome was compared between various time points during follow-up with linear mixed models. Of the 42 originally included patients, 37 participated at follow-up (11.9% loss to follow-up, 100% response rate). The mean patient age was 56.1 years, and 42.9% of patients were female. Surgical approaches were anterior (76.2%), posterior (21.4%), or posterior with fusion (2.4%). The mean follow-up was 10.8 years (range 10-12 years). The mean mJOA score increased significantly from 13.1 (SD 2.3) at baseline to 14.2 (SD 3.3) at 10 years (p = 0.01). A minimal clinically important difference was achieved in 54.1%, and stabilization of functional status was maintained in 75.0% in the long term. Patients who worsened were older (median 63 vs 52 years, p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (70.0% vs 25.9%, p < 0.01). A beneficial effect of surgery was self-reported by 78.3% of patients. Surgical treatment for DCM results in satisfactory improvement of functional outcome that is maintained at 10-year follow-up.