Treatment Of Carcinoma Research Articles

A Podcast on Practical Considerations in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer Receiving First-Line Cisplatin- or Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Avelumab Maintenance in a Changing Therapeutic Landscape.

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma for decades, based on its proven efficacy and well-characterized safety profile. Although enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the EV-302 phase 3 trial, common and potentially cumulative toxicities associated with EV plus pembrolizumab may make this combination less suitable for some patients, such as those with pre-existing neuropathy, hyperglycemia, or hepatic impairment, or patients likely to have favorable outcomes with platinum-based chemotherapy. The availability of EV plus pembrolizumab in various countries may also be limited by financial considerations. Thus, platinum-based chemotherapy is likely to remain a valuable option for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Eligibility for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens can be determined by assessing renal function, performance status, and specific comorbidities. In cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients without disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy, avelumab first-line maintenance is standard of care based on findings from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, which showed that avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone across clinically relevant subgroups. Adverse events associated with avelumab were generally consistent with those observed with other immune checkpoint inhibitors, and long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns with prolonged treatment. Efficacy benefits and safety profiles were similar in patients who received avelumab first-line maintenance after cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. The effectiveness and safety of avelumab first-line maintenance have been confirmed in several real-world studies. Overall, these data support the use of avelumab first-line maintenance for all platinum-treated patients without disease progression. In this podcast, we discuss the evolving role of platinum-based chemotherapy in this disease setting in the context of EV-302 trial results and describe practical considerations in patients receiving first-line cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab plus transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with high tumor burden unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study

BackgroundThough atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC). MethodsThis three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3–4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS). ResultsEmploying the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3–4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded. ConclusionsThe findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.

Progress of natural sesquiterpenoids in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the common malignant tumors of digestive tract, which seriously threatens the life of patients due to its high incidence rate, strong invasion, metastasis, and prognosis. At present, the main methods for preventing and treating HCC include medication, surgery, and intervention, but patients frequently encounter with specific adverse reactions or side effects. Many Traditional Chinese medicine can improve liver function, reduce liver cancer recurrence and have unique advantages in the treatment of HCC because of their acting mode of multi-target, multi-pathway, multi-component, and multi-level. Sesquiterpenoids, a class of natural products which are widely present in nature and exhibit good anti-tumor activity, and many of them possess good potential for the treatment of HCC. This article reviewed the anti-tumor activities, natural resources, pharmacological mechanism of natural sesquiterpenoids against HCC, providing the theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of HCC and a comprehensive understanding of their potential for development of new clinical drugs.

Modern TARE 2023 - from palliative care to a curative treatment alternative

Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) or transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) is an alternative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or hepatic metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) and is now anchored in many guidelines. The article summarises the current guidelines on SIRT/TARE in HCC and mCRC.

Acetylsalicylic Acid with Ascorbate: A Promising Combination Therapy for Solid Tumors.

Cancer is a deadly disease with high mortality rates in developing countries. A recent preclinical study found promising results in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by combining acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ascorbate (AS), which might offer a safer alternative to expensive clinical chemotherapeutics; however, the impact of this combination on other tumors remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of combining ASA and AS in treating Ehrlich solid tumors. Eighty female Swiss albino mice were divided into eight groups (10 mice/group): four healthy groups (healthy, AS, ASA, and AS+ASA) and four groups with carcinoma (Ehrlich ascites carcinoma [EAC], EAC+AS, EAC+ASA, and EAC+AS+ASA). AS was injected intraperitoneally (4g/kg) daily for 10 days, whereas ASA was ingested orally at 60 mg/kg/day for 10 days. Carcinoma was induced by subcutaneous injection of 1×106 EAC cells/mouse once. Treatment of carcinoma started after 10 days of tumor inoculation. Blood, livers, and tumors were obtained, and tumor weights, volumes, and levels of hemoglobin, aminotransferases, albumin, bilirubin, urea, creatinine, lipid profile, malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, glutathione, catalase, total antioxidant capacity, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase were estimated. The percentage increase in lifespan was also assessed. Tumor treatment alleviated tumor burden. Tumor size was reduced, lifespan increased, organs (liver, kidney, and heart) functions adjusted, hemoglobin, lipid profile improved, and oxidative stress decreased. Combining ASA with AS showed more effective antitumor effects than only ASA or AS alone. After more validation research, combining ASA with AS may provide benefit in cancer treatment.

Comparison of Three Chemotherapy Protocols With Electrochemotherapy for the Treatment of Feline Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) with intravenous (IV) and/or intratumoral (IT) bleomycin has shown considerable efficacy in the treatment of non-resectable feline cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), boasting response rates of up to 95%, but other chemotherapy protocols have not yet been investigated. The objective of this prospective multicentre study was to compare the overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free interval (PFI) between cats with cSCC treated with ECT using IT and IV carboplatin (IV + IT), IV carboplatin (IV) or IV bleomycin (IV). A total of 44 cats with unresectable cSCC across three centres were enrolled and treated with ECT using carboplatin IV + IT (n = 10), carboplatin IV (n = 11) or bleomycin IV (n = 23). Treatment response according to RECIST criteria was recorded at 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment, and patients were followed until disease progression and/or death. All three groups were comparable regarding age, sex, weight, and lesion size. Adverse events were generally mild, localised and similar between groups. ORRs were 90.0% (carboplatin IV + IT), 90.9% (carboplatin IV) and 95.6% (bleomycin IV) and were not significantly different (p = 0.79). Median PFI was not reached for carboplatin IV + IT or carboplatin IV and was 566 days for bleomycin IV, with no significant difference between the three groups (p = 0.81). This study suggests that ECT using IV or IV + IT carboplatin is a reasonable alternative therapeutic option for managing cSCC, and further studies are warranted to compare outcomes between treatment protocols.

Resveratrol-based nano-formulations as an emerging therapeutic strategy for ovarian carcinoma: autophagy stimulation and SIRT-1/Beclin/MMP-9/P53/AKT signaling

BackgroundResveratrol (RVS) is a stilbene derivative polyphenolic compound extensively recognized for its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-aging properties, along with its enormous promise in carcinoma treatment. Unfortunately, the oral supplementation of RVS possesses physicochemical and pharmacokinetic constraints that hinder its effects, necessitating the development of suitable administration strategies to improve its effectiveness. As a result, the current study evaluates the use of resveratrol nano-formulations in ovarian cancer therapy. Ovarian cancer was induced in rats using (35 mg/kg BW) 20-Methyl cholanthrene (20-MC) followed by resveratrol and resveratrol nano-formulations therapy for one month.Results20-MC highlighted a noticeable alleviation in autophagy (ATF) biomarkers SIRT-1 and Beclin, inflammatory and apoptotic biomarkers MMP-9, P53 and AKT in addition to oxidative and nitrosative stress biomarkers TAC and NOX and ovarian cancer tumor biomarker CA-125.ConclusionsResveratrol and resveratrol nano-formulations modulated autophagy, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers with the upper effect for resveratrol nano-formulations in competing 20-MC-induced ovarian cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Salvage-line Nivolumab Monotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of 240mg Versus 480mg Doses.

Nivolumab monotherapy is the standardsecond-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy without anti-PD-1 antibody. Fixed dosing with 240mg every 2weeks was approved initially, followed by fixed dosing with 480mg every 4weeks based on pharmacokinetics data. However, information on the comparative efficacy and safety of the two doses remains limited. We compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) between the two doses in 117 patients who received second-line (n = 85) or later-line (n = 32) nivolumab monotherapy at our institution between January 2016 and December 2021. In the second-line group, patient characteristics for the 240mg and 480mg groups were as follows (240mg vs. 480mg): performance status (PS) 0/1/2 was 34/61/5% vs. 54/42/4%, and prior fluoropyrimidine plus platinum therapy (FP) was 81.3% vs. 42.3%. In the later-line group, the characteristics were: PS 0/1/2 was 28/60/12% vs. 14/86/0%, and prior FP was 60.0% vs. 42.8%. ORR was 11.9 vs. 24.0% in the second-line group (p = 0.19) and 0 vs. 14.3% in the later-line group (p = 0.22). Median PFS was 1.7 vs. 4.1months on second-line (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.01, p = 0.056) and 1.4 vs. 1.8months on later-line (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.23-1.46, p = 0.25); AEs of any grade were observed in 58.3 vs. 69.7%, respectively. The efficacy and safety of the two doses of nivolumab monotherapy were comparable in patients with advanced ESCC.

Clip-anchored floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with endoscopic tunneling in treatment of long circumferential early esophageal carcinoma.

Clip-anchored floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with endoscopic tunneling in treatment of long circumferential early esophageal carcinoma.

Case report: Complete response after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with donafenib plus tislelizumab therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus in a patient coinfected with HIV and HBV

BackgroundCoinfection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) occurs in 5–67% of patients with HIV. HIV weakens the human immune system and leads to various tumors. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HIV experience poor treatment efficacy and have a short survival period. Approximately 70% of cases of HCC are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the subtle onset of the disease. As a result, most cases are not suits for curative therapy. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for intermediate-stage HCC and is commonly used to treat unresectable HCC in China. Recent advancements in systemic treatments have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of unresectable HCC treatment. Several previous study showed that combination treatment combination therapy can enhance the efficacy. Notably, studies proposed that TACE combined targeted drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors results in a high objective response rate and overall survival. However, the novelty of this study lies in its report of a complete response using a triple combination in patients with HIV and HCC with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus.Case presentationA 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with HCC with a main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus combined with HIV infection, cirrhosis, and chronic viral hepatitis. She underwent TACE and was administered donafenib and tislelizumab. This triple therapy treatment regimen resulted in a clinical complete response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography.ConclusionWe first used TACE combined with donafenib and tislelizumab for HCC patients with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus and HIV-HBV coinfection and achieved complete response.

The Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion

Vascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma involves tumor plugs in the main trunk of the portal vein, bile ducts, and veins, and it indicates poor prognosis. It is often associated with portal hypertension, which requires evaluation and management. Treatment includes hepatic resection, systemic pharmacotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Recurrence rates post-hepatic resection are high, and systemic drug therapy often has limited therapeutic potential in patients with a poor hepatic reserve. Single therapies are generally inadequate, necessitating combining multiple therapies with adjuvant and systemic pharmacotherapy before and after hepatectomy. This narrative review will provide an overview of the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion.

Treatment Strategies for Locoregional Recurrence in Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review

Emerging evidence has shown remarkable advances in the multimodal treatment of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Despite these advances, the oncological outcomes for advanced esophageal cancer remain controversial due to the frequent observation of local recurrence in the regional or other lymph nodes and distant metastasis after curative treatment. For cases of locoregional recurrence in the cervical lymph nodes alone, salvage surgery with lymph node dissection generally provides a good prognosis. However, if recurrence occurs in multiple regions, the oncological efficacy of surgery may be limited. Radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy can be employed for unresectable or recurrent cases, as well as for selected cases in neo- or adjuvant settings. Dose escalation and toxicity are potential issues with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; however, more precise therapeutic efficacy can be obtained using technical modifications with improved targeting and conformality, or with the use of proton beam therapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including pembrolizumab or nivolumab, in addition to chemotherapy, has been shown to improve the overall survival in unresectable, advanced/recurrent cases. For patients with lymph node recurrence in multiple regions, chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] plus cisplatin) and combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab have shown comparable oncological efficacy. Further prospective studies are needed to improve the treatment outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer with locoregional recurrence.

Clinical Results of Holmium-166 Radioembolization with Personalized Dosimetry for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with 166Ho-loaded microspheres is an established locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), introduced in 2010. This study evaluates the clinical outcome of patients with HCC who underwent 166Ho-TARE with personalized dosimetry. Twenty-seven patients with 36 TARE procedures were analyzed. Treatment planning, execution, and evaluation was possible without complications in all cases. At the 3-month follow-up, disease control in the treated liver was achieved in 81.8% of patients (complete remission, partial remission, and stable disease in 36.4%, 31.8%, and 13.6%, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) was 17.2 months, and progression-free survival (PFS) in the treated liver was 11 months. Statistically significant positive correlations were observed between the achieved radiation dose for the tumor and both PFS (r = 0.62, p < 0.05) and OS (r = 0.48, p < 0.05), suggesting a direct dose–response relationship. The calculated achieved dose was 8.25 Gy lower than the planned dose, with relevant variance between planned and achieved doses in individual cases. These results confirm the efficacy of the 166Ho-TARE holmium platform and underscore the potential of voxel-based, personalized dosimetry to improve clinical outcomes.

Hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk: A propensity score matching study.

To ascertain the therapeutic efficacy and safety of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors (PD-1 inhibitors) (triple therapy), as a first-line treatment in high-risk advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC with Vp4 portal vein invasion or/and tumor diameter ≥ 10cm). This retrospective multicenter study included 466 high-risk aHCC patients treated with either triple therapy (n = 245) or dual therapy (TKI and PD-1 inhibitors, n = 221). The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias between the two groups. After PSM (1:1), 194 patients in each group were analyzed. The triple-therapy group showed a longer median OS (24.6 months vs. 11.9 months; HR = 0.43, P < 0.001) and a longer median PFS (10.0 months vs. 7.7 months; HR = 0.68, P = 0.002) than the dual-therapy group. The survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 94.2%, 71.0%, and 50.8% for triple therapy and 75.9%, 49.9%, and 26.8% for dual therapy. The ORR in the triple-therapy group was significantly higher (57.7% vs. 28.9%, P < 0.001). In the triple-therapy group, more patients converted to non-high-risk (68.0% vs. 36.6%, P < 0.001) and received salvage liver resection or ablation after downstaging conversion (16.5% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.033). The grade 3/4 adverse events were 59.2% and 47.4% in the triple-therapy group and dual-therapy group, respectively (P = 0.022). FOLFOX-based HAIC plus TKI and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improve survival prognosis compared with TKI plus PD-1 inhibitors. This is a potential first-line treatment for high-risk aHCC, with a relatively controlled safety profile.

Targeted redox-responsive peptide for arterial chemoembolization therapy of orthotropic hepatocellular carcinoma.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) is the first choice for the treatment of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, TACE suffers from a lack of specificity and rapid drug release. Herein, a targeted redox-responsive peptide (TRRP) was synthesized and used as a carrier of doxorubicin (DOX) to enhance the efficacy of TACE through tumor cells targeting and controlled drug release. TRRP has a high loading capacity of DOX and a sensitive drug release behavior at high glutathione (GSH) concentration. Moreover, TRRP could bind to the transferrin receptor on the surface of tumor cells, which enhanced the efficacy of TACE and reduced side effects of TACE. TACE with TRRP@DOX dispersed in lipiodol shows an enhanced therapeutic outcome compared to the treatment with DOX + lipiodol emulsion in orthotopic rat HCC models. TRRP has a high loading capacity of DOX and a sensitive drug release behavior at GSH concentration. Moreover, TRRP could bind to the transferrin receptor on the surface of tumor cells, which enhanced the efficacy of TACE and reduced side effects of TACE. TACE with TRRP@DOX dispersed in lipiodol shows an enhanced therapeutic outcome compared to the treatment with DOX + lipiodol emulsion in orthotopic rat HCC models. This study demonstrated that TRRP was a promising therapeutic agent for enhancing TACE therapy for HCC treatment.

Evolution of liver function during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Deterioration of liver function is a leading cause of death in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treatment on liver function and outcomes. HCC patients receiving ICIs or sorafenib between 04/2003 and 05/2024 were included. Liver function (assessed by Child-Pugh score [CPS]) was evaluated at the start of ICI-treatment (baseline, BL) and 3 and 6months thereafter. A ≥1 point change in CPS was defined as deterioration (-) or improvement (+), while equal CPS points were defined as stable (=). Overall, 182 ICI-treated patients (66.8±11.8years; cirrhosis: n=134, 74%) were included. At BL, median CPS was 5 (IQR: 5-6; CPS-A: 147, 81%). After 3months, liver function improved/stabilized in 102 (56%) and deteriorated in 61 (34%) patients, while 19 (10%) patients deceased/had missing follow-up (d/noFU). Comparable results were observed at 6months (+/=: n=82, 45%; -: n=55, 30%; d/noFU: n=45, 25%). In contrast, 54 (34%) and 33 (21%) out of 160 sorafenib patients achieved improvement/stabilization at 3 and 6months, respectively. Radiological response was linked to CPS improvement/stabilization at 6months (responders vs. non-responders, 73% vs. 50%; p=0.007). CPS improvement/stabilization at 6months was associated with better overall survival following landmark analysis (6months: +/=: 28.4 [95% CI: 18.7-38.1] versus -: 14.2 [95% CI: 10.3-18.2] months; p<0.001). Of 35 ICI-patients with CPS-B at BL, improvement/stabilization occurred in 16 (46%) patients, while 19 (54%) patients deteriorated/d/noFU at 3months. Comparable results were observed at 6months (CPS +/=: 14, 40%, -: 8, 23%). Importantly, 6/35 (17%) and 9/35 (26%) patients improved from CPS-B to CPS-A at 3 and 6months. Radiological response to ICI-treatment was associated with stabilization or improvement in liver function, which correlated with improved survival, even in patients with Child-Pugh class B at baseline.

Feasibility of weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy for localized anal cancer – A Danish anal cancer group report

BackgroundChemoradiotherapy (CRT) with flourouracil and mitomycin is the standard treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), however the associated acute toxicity often hinders compliance. Although weekly cisplatin is a well-established treatment for other squamous cell carcinomas, it has not been explored in SCCA. PurposeTo investigate if radiotherapy (RT) with weekly cisplatin is a feasible option for SCCA and to report the acute toxicity. Material/methodsPatients were treated with RT and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 between 1998–2020. Retrospective data from medical records (n = 65) and prospectively collected data from an observational study (n = 51) comprising physicianassessed toxicity (NCI-CTCAE 4.0), patient-reported outcomes (EORTC-QlQC30 + CR29) baseline, mid-therapy, end of treatment and 2–4 weeks post-treatment were included. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsWe included 116 patients. T-stages were T1:4 %, T2: 71 %, T3: 17 %, T4: 8 % and 47 % has N + disease. RT doses were 53.75–64 Gy/45–51.2 Gy and the mean cumulative dose of cisplatin was 307.5 mg. The median overall treatment time was 43 days. Within 6 months after CRT 88.9 % had complete response. The median follow-up time was 4.5 years and 5-year DFS and OS were 77 % (95 %CI 68.7–84.5 %) and 86.4 % (95 %CI 78.3–91.7 %), respectively. Hospitalization occured in 20 % with 2.6 % being admitted due to febrile neutropenia. Hematological toxicty was low with 13.7 % grade 3 and 3.9 % grade 4. Anal pain, skin, gastrointestinal and urogenital toxicity were mild. ConclusionRT and weekly cisplatin for SCCA showed good outcome results and an acceptable acute toxicity profile.

A study comparing the cost-effectiveness of conventional and drug-eluting transarterial chemoembolisation (cTACE and DEB-TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in an Australian public hospital.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is an established technique to treat patients with intermediate-stage HCC. The aim of this study was to generate accurate costing data on cTACE and DEB-TACE in an Australian setting and assess whether one of the procedures offers favourable cost-effectiveness. Costing study using data from all TACE procedures performed at a single centre between January 2018 and December 2022. Data were included from all direct and indirect costs including operative costs, wages, overheads, ward costs, transfusion, pathology, pharmacy and ward support. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by dividing local costs by existing high-quality data on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). 64 TACE treatments were performed on 44 patients. Mean age was 66.5 years and 91% were male. Overall median total cost per patient for the entire TACE treatment regime was AUD$7380 (range AUD$3719-$20,258). However, 39% of patients received more than one treatment, and the median cost per individual treatment was AUD$5270 (range AUD$3533-$15,818). The difference in median cost between cTACE (AUD$4978) and DEB-TACE (AUD$9202) was significant, P < 0.001. In calculating cost-effectiveness, each cTACE treatment cost AUD$2489 per QALY gained, while each DEB-TACE cost AUD$3834 per QALY gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for DEB-TACE over cTACE was AUD$10,560 per QALY gained. Both cTACE and DEB-TACE are low-cost treatments in Australia. However, DEB-TACE offers a solution with an ICER of AUD$10,560 per QALY gained which is below the Australian government willingness to pay threshold and thus is a more cost-effective treatment.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of frontline immunotherapy combinations in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis highlighting the value of PD-L1 expression positivity scores

IntroductionThe systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) consolidate all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to initial immunotherapy treatments for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our goal is to thoroughly assess the effectiveness and safety of various immunotherapy methods, focusing on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with advanced ESCC positive for PD-L1.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, covering all records from their inception until January 22, 2024. The inclusion criteria targeted patients with advanced ESCC undergoing first-line immunotherapy or chemotherapy, limiting the study selection to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclusively. The study upholds the values of openness, originality, and dependability, as evidenced by its enrollment in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024504992).ResultsOur analysis encompasses 7 RCTs, totaling 4688 patients, and evaluates 8 distinct immunotherapy combinations. In advanced ESCC patients irrespective of PD-L1 expression, both sintilimab-chemotherapy and toripalimab-chemotherapy regimens demonstrated comparable OS benefits (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.64-1.33). The most pronounced PFS advantages were seen with sintilimab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy as compared to standard chemotherapy (HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.58). Notably, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.59-1.16) and nivolumab-ipilimumab (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.17) demonstrated significant safety profiles over chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis based on PD-L1 expression revealed nivolumab-chemotherapy to yield the highest OS benefit (HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.79) in ESCC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Furthermore, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.67) exhibited superior PFS benefits. Among patients with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.78) emerged as the most efficacious in improving OS, while serplulimab-chemotherapy (HR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.34-0.68) was associated with the longest PFS benefit.ConclusionThe integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy appears to significantly enhance survival outcomes in patients with advanced ESCC compared to chemotherapy alone. Sintilimab-chemotherapy is potentially the optimal regimen for patients without PD-L1 expression. In contrast, nivolumab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy are likely to offer the best OS and PFS benefits, respectively, in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Among those with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy is projected to provide the greatest OS advantage, whereas serplulimab-chemotherapy is anticipated to offer the most prolonged PFS benefit. Since most of the patients in this study originated from Asia, the above findings are more applicable to the Asian population.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024504992.

Transarterial chemoembolization for renal cell carcinoma patients with liver metastases in the era of immunotherapy: A case series

Treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed rapidly in the past decade with the widespread implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line therapy in metastatic disease. The presence of liver metastases is a poor prognostic indicator but also has the potential to be a target for localized therapy. However, there is limited knowledge on the dynamics and long-term effects of combining liver-directed transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with ICI therapy. We identified four patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) and liver metastases who were treated concurrently with ICIs and TACE to metastatic liver lesions from our institutional database. We assessed treatment radiological responses and toxicity in this cohort. Liver-directed TACE with concurrent ICI was associated with radiological response or stabilization in all the liver lesions in the four patients in this cohort with a median time to locoregional liver metastasis progression-free survival of 8.3 months (range 6.0–11.1). The concurrent administration of ICI therapy and TACE to liver lesions was well tolerated with no new safety signals and no immune-related toxicities. Combining TACE with ICI in patients with mRCC showed promising response with limited toxicity. Future studies are warranted to clarify treatment timing and validate benefits.