Treatment Of Allergic Respiratory Diseases Research Articles

Multifactorial analysis of willingness to undergo subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy in pediatric patients

Objective: To explore factors influencing the acceptance of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases by pediatric patients and their families.
 Methods: A total of 406 children (210 males and 196 females) attending the pediatric outpatient clinics and wards of the Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from June 2020 to April 2022. Those who met the criteria for the AIT treatment, were included in the survey. An online 20-item questionnaire was developed. Data on patient’s general characteristics, allergic disease status, family history of allergies, general family information, parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and whether the AIT treatment was recommended by a physician, were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to their willingness to receive AIT: a reluctant or neutral group (n = 182), and a willing group (n = 224). A univariate analysis of the willingness to undergo AIT was done to detect parameters that significantly differed between the groups, and the identified factors were used as independent variables in the multifactorial logistic regression analysis.
 Results: The severity of allergic disease, presence of drug allergy, occurrence of severe allergic reactions, mother’s education, distance from home to the hospital, parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and whether the doctor recommended AIT were all statistically different between the groups (p < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that the degree of allergic rhinitis (AR), or asthma (AS), parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and doctor’s recommendation of AIT were the factors that influenced the willingness of pediatric patients to receive AIT.
 Conclusions: The severity of AR and AS, parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and doctor’s recommendation influenced the willingness of pediatric patients to receive AIT.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.5.8581
 How to cite this: Ding B, Zhong J, Jiang C, Ma T, Shen Q, Lu Y. Measurement of Service Quality Gaps in Dental Services using SERVQUAL in Public Hospitals of Rawalpindi. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(5):820-828. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.5.8581
 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Evaluation of patients’ expectation and benefits of sublingual Named-Patient Products in the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases: The French ERAPP prospective cohort study

Evaluation of patients’ expectation and benefits of sublingual Named-Patient Products in the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases: The French ERAPP prospective cohort study

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with a mixture of glutaraldehyde-modified extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, and Blomia tropicalis

BackgroundAllergen Immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective treatment of allergic respiratory diseases induced by the inhalation of house dust mite allergens. ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of glutaraldehyde polymerized allergen extracts using a mixture of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, D. farinae and Blomia tropicalis in mite allergic individuals residing in Colombia. MethodsTwo hundred and fifty (250) patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with, or without asthma and sensitized to D. pteronyssinus, D. farinae and B. tropicalis were included. A glutaraldehyde-modified extract containing a mixture of D. pteronyssinus, D. farinae and B. tropicalis was employed, using a cluster up-dosing schedule followed by a monthly maintenance dose. The primary endpoints to evaluate the clinical impact were the Combined Symptom and Medication Scores (CSMS) for allergic rhinitis, the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the reduction in medication consumption. ResultsSignificant improvement was found after 3 months of treatment regarding CSMS (p < 0.0001) and ACT (p < 0.0001). Additionally, a significant decrease in medication consumption was found after 3 months of treatment (p < 0.0001). Adverse reactions, either local or systemic were mild and no severe reactions related to the vaccines were observed. ConclusionAfter 12 months of allergen immunotherapy, glutaraldehyde-modified mixture of D. pteronyssinus, D. farinae and B. tropicalis proved to be safe and effective in the treatment of patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma due to allergy to mites.

Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic respiratory disease.

Subcutaneous immunotherapy is recognized as a cornerstone in the management of allergic respiratory disease in patients who are properly characterized with allergy and with allergic rhinoconjunctivis and/or well-controlled asthma, and who are willing to adhere to the rigorous treatment program. A key tenet is that it affords the opportunity to effect long-term clinical remission through its disease-modifying properties. Furthermore, it has the potential to prevent the progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma, prevent new allergen sensitivities, and improve a patient's quality of life.

Safe Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Dosing Adjustments Following Prolonged Interruptions In Therapy Due To Covid-19 Pandemic

Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy is a well-established treatment for allergic respiratory diseases. Once at maintenance doses, injections are typically given every 2 to 4 weeks and doses adjusted due to missed injections. During the Covid-19 pandemic our practice suspended immunotherapy injections from March 17, 2020 through May 5, 2020. Upon resumption, doses were adjusted with an emphasis on trying to keep patients in the same concentration vial as their previous injection. We sought to characterize reactions to restarting injections after prolonged disruption.

Allergen Immunotherapy in children with respiratory allergic diseases.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a well-established treatment for allergic respiratory diseases. It represents a cornerstone in the clinical management of allergic children since it is the only curative option to date able to modify the natural history of Ig-E mediated allergic diseases. Through a well-defined immunologic mechanism, AIT promotes regulatory T cells and cuts down the immune response induced by allergens. According to current guidelines based on up-to-date evidence, AIT should be offered to children with moderate-severe allergic rhinitis and/or controlled asthma starting from 5 years of age, further to an adequate risk-benefit assessment which includes patient's adherence to the treatment and a proper selection of the right product. Younger age and mild disease could be considered based on an individual evaluation. Both subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) routes of administration have a good efficacy and safety profile with safer outcomes for SLIT compared to SCIT. Only standardized products with documented evidence of clinical efficacy should be used. Although AIT is used worldwide, there are still gaps and limitations, including the lack of reliable biomarkers predictive of the clinical outcome. Novel adjuvants are currently under investigations to boost the strength and efficiency of the immune response, as well as new formulations with better efficacy and better patient's adherence to the treatment. Herein, we aim to provide an overview of current key evidence with major regard to clinical practice as well as knowledge gaps and future research needs in the context of AIT in children with respiratory allergic diseases.

Planning and approach to allergen-specific immunotherapy in polyallergic patients.

Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is currently the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic-respiratory diseases. Polysensitization may increase the severity of current disease resulting in subsequent asthma development in patients with allergic rhinitis. Due to the absence of general recommendations for the practical approach to polysensitized patients, clinical management is not standardized. The correlation between sensitizations and clinical symptoms, elimination of possible pollen cross-reactivities and principles of homologous allergen groups will guide the allergists to deduce the most relevant allergens for AIT. In the highlight of the previously proposed approach strategies to polyallergic patients, hereby we propose a revised practical stepwise approach based on the current European Medicine Agency (EMA) guidelines. However, more supporting data from well-designed, controlled, future studies are needed to improve clinical management recommendations for AIT in polyallergic patients.

Sublingual allergen immunotherapy for respiratory allergy: a systematic review.

The objective of the systematic review is to provide complete and updated information on efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) formulations for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases (ARDs). The literature search was conducted on PubMed database, involving double-blind, randomized clinical trials published between January 1992 and 2018, written in English, and performed in humans. The number of articles finally selected for review was 112. Data from the majority of properly controlled clinical trials demonstrate that SLIT is effective not only with short-term use (first year) but also with long-term use (up to the third year of active therapy), for treating ARDs in children and adults. Both continuous and discontinuous schemes of administration showed significant reductions in symptom and medication scores. Moreover, a SLIT-induced disease-modifying effect has been documented mainly with grass pollen extracts, since improvement is maintained during at least 2 years of follow-up after a 3-year treatment period. Additionally, allergen immunotherapy should also be considered a preventive strategy, especially for decreasing bronchial asthma incidence in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis treated with SLIT. This therapy is also safe, producing only a few mainly local and mild-to-moderate adverse events, and usually self-limited in time. The registration and authorization of allergen SLIT preparations (grasses and house-dust mite tablets) as drugs by regulatory agencies, such as the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), has represented a landmark in allergy immunotherapy research. Further long-term studies, specially designed with allergens other than grass pollen or house-dust mites, not only in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis but also on asthmatic subjects, as well as studies comparing different administration schedules and/or routes, are required in order to continue the progress in the modern development of this particularly promising therapy.

Mammalian raw materials used to produce allergen extracts

ObjectiveTo provide information about the complexity of skin-derived mammalian allergen extracts and recent advances made in their characterization and production. Data SourcesOriginal and review articles (involving nonfood allergy to mammals) published in indexed journals were searched in the PubMed database. Study SelectionsStudies were selected with the following criteria: novelty, species of the study, and date of publication. ResultsThe information provided will help in the understanding and the selection of the appropriate allergen source materials for the preparation of extracts for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases induced by the inhalation of skin-derived mammalian allergens. The data presented herein suggest the presence of cross-reactive and species-specific allergens in extracts prepared from different mammalian dander. Dander should be strongly considered in the preparation of allergenic extracts not only of cats and dogs but also of other mammalian species. ConclusionNew methods should be developed to estimate the relative quantities of specific allergens in the extracts. The current knowledge illustrates the complexity of these extracts, and more efforts should be undertaken to fully understand the wide spectrum of mammalian allergens.

Allergic respiratory disease (ARD), setting forth the basics: proposals of an expert consensus report

BackgroundThe variability of symptoms observed in patients with respiratory allergy often hampers classification based on the criteria proposed in guidelines on rhinitis and asthma.ObjectivesWe assessed specific aspects of allergic respiratory disease (ARD) that are not explicitly addressed in the guidelines in order to issue specific recommendations and thus optimize clinical practice.MethodsUsing the Delphi technique, 40 Spanish allergists were surveyed to reach consensus on 71 items related to ARD.ResultsConsensus was achieved for 95.7% of the items. These included the following: the clinical manifestations of ARD are heterogeneous and individual airborne allergens can be related to specific clinical profiles; the optimal approach in patients with ARD is based on the global assessment of rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma; aeroallergens are largely responsible for the clinical features and severity of the disease; and clinical expression is associated with the period of environmental exposure to the allergen. Pharmacological treatment of ARD is often based on the intensity of symptoms recorded during previous allergen exposures and cannot always be administered following a step-up approach, as recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only option for overall treatment of respiratory symptoms using an etiological approach. AIT can modify the prognosis of ARD and should therefore be considered a valuable first-line treatment.ConclusionsThe present study highlights gaps in current asthma and rhinitis guidelines and addresses specific aspects of ARD, such as global assessment of both asthma and rhinitis or the specific role of variable allergen exposure in the clinical expression of the disease.

Sublingual Immunotherapy Dosing Regimens: What Is Ideal?

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a treatment for allergic respiratory diseases that has demonstrated efficacy and safety. Several formulations of SLIT are now available worldwide for treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Grass tablets containing 15 to 25 μg of group 5 major allergen reduced combined AR symptoms and medication use by 23% to 41% in 3 treatment years and 2 follow-up years. Ragweed pollen tablets (12 μg of Ambrosia artemisiifolia 1) and liquid extracts (50 μg of Ambrosia artemisiifolia 1) reduced combined AR symptoms and medication use by 26% and 43%, respectively. House dust mite tablets containing 300 index of reactivity (16 μg of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 1 and 68 μg of Dermatophagoides farinae 1) reduced AR symptoms by 17.9% and 17.0% in 1 treatment year and 1 follow-up year, respectively. A different house dust mite tablet (12 standardized quality house dust mite) was able to reduce the risk of asthma exacerbation compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.96). Most adverse events were local and mild to moderate in severity. For SLIT products reviewed herein, effective doses range from 1.12 to 84 μg of major allergen(s). However, allergen content is not uniformly standardized, can be expressed in arbitrary or proprietary units (depending on the manufacturer), and assays for determination of allergen content are highly variable. Thus, results from one study of a given product cannot be extrapolated to other products. Despite these limitations, this Clinical Management Review aims to provide practitioners with relevant information on the dosing of selected SLIT formulations in the treatment of allergic respiratory disease.

Knowledge, perspectives and attitudes about allergen-specific immunotherapy for respiratory allergic disease among paediatricians in Turkey

BackgroundAllergen-specific immunotherapy (ASI) is the only effective treatment for allergic respiratory diseases which has the potential to change the natural course of the disease. In this present study we aimed to evaluate the paediatricians’ knowledge, perspectives and attitudes about ASI for allergic respiratory diseases. Materials and methodsThe study was conducted between September 2014 – January 2015. A survey of 25 questions assessing paediatricians’ knowledge, perceptions and attitudes about ASI was developed by an expert panel and applied by physicians in hospitals in Izmir, Turkey, where the paediatricians work. Data were recorded in SPSS for Windows v.16. Descriptive statistics, chi square analysis was used. P<0.05 was considered as significant. ResultsFully completed surveys from 180 paediatricians were analysed. The respondent paediatricians had an age of 37±8.2 years, and 56 of them were male. The majority of the respondents (n: 146) were working fewer than five years as a paediatric specialist. 93.9% of the paediatricians believed that ASI was effective for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. There was satisfactory knowledge of the characteristics, aims, effects and limits of ASI. ConclusionASI is generally well-known and accepted among paediatricians. A better synergy between paediatricians and paediatric allergy specialists can provide more use of this treatment method for allergic respiratory diseases in childhood.

Evidence in immunotherapy for paediatric respiratory allergy: Advances and recommendations. Document of the Immunotherapy Working Group of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Clinical Immunology and Allergology (SEICAP)

Allergic respiratory diseases are major health problems in paediatric population due their high level of prevalence and chronicity, and to their relevance in the costs and quality of life. One of the most important risk factors for the development of airway diseases in children and adolescents is atopy. The mainstays for the treatment of these diseases are avoiding allergens, controlling symptoms, and preventing them through sustained desensitization by allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT is a treatment option that consists in the administration of increasing amounts of allergens to modify the biological response to them, inducing long-term tolerance even after treatment has ended. This treatment approach has shown to decrease symptoms and improve quality of life, becoming cost effective for a large number of patients. In addition, it is considered the only treatment that can influence the natural course of the disease by targeting the cause of the allergic inflammatory response. The aim of this publication is to reflect the advances of AIT in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases in children and adolescents reviewing articles published since 2000, establishing evidence categories to support the strength of the recommendations based on evidence. The first part of the article covers the prerequisite issues to understand how AIT is effective, such as the correct etiologic and clinical diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases. Following this, the article outlines the advancements in understanding the mechanisms by which AIT achieve immune tolerance to allergens. Administration routes, treatment regimens, dose and duration, efficacy, safety, and factors associated with adherence are also reviewed. Finally, the article reviews future advances in the research of AIT.

Nonallergic rhinitis and lower airway disease

In the past years, several investigators have demonstrated the existence of local nasal responses in some patients with typical allergic rhinitis symptoms but without atopy and have defined a new phenotype called local allergic rhinitis (LAR) or 'entopy'. In a percentage of LAR subjects, the upper airway disease is also associated with lower airway symptoms. After the description of this phenotype, the differential diagnosis between LAR and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) has become a challenge for the clinician. To correctly identify LAR patients is of high importance for treatment and management of these patients, and for an appropriate inclusion of patients in clinical trials and genetics studies. The treatment of LAR patients, in contrast with NAR, is oriented to allergen avoidance and specific treatment. Allergen immunotherapy, the aetiological treatment for allergic respiratory diseases, has demonstrated to be an effective and safe treatment in LAR, increasing immunological tolerance, and reducing the clinical symptoms and the use of medication. In this article, the important and novel aspects of LAR in terms of mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment will be discussed. Also, the involvement of the lower airway and the potential role of IgE in the bronchial disease will be also reviewed.

Allergen Immunotherapy Adherence in the Real World: How Bad Is It and How Can It Be Improved?

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only available causal treatment for allergic respiratory diseases; however, data demonstrate a high discontinuation rate for both subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). The complex mechanism of action of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) includes an interaction of innate and adaptive immune processes, resulting in immune tolerance, as illustrated by a decrease in specific immunoglobulin (Ig)-E, an increase in specific IgG1 and IgG4, and inhibition of inflammation involving mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. This induction of immune tolerance leads to a significant improvement in symptoms and decreased medication scores. A 3- to 5-year course of AIT is required to obtain this disease-modifying effect, which substantially differentiates AIT frompharmacologic treatment. A carry-over effect can persist for up to 12 years. Furthermore, AIT may prevent the onset of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis, as well as decreasing the onset of new sensitizations to inhalant allergens. Several meta-analyses and controlled studies, involving adult and pediatric subjects, have indicated that both sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) are relatively safe, effective, and well tolerated. AIT may also have a positive impact on the cost to the healthcare system, as evidence indicates the cost–benefit of such treatment. Adherence to AIT is crucial for a positive clinical outcome and non-adherence represents a major drawback for such therapy. It actually concerns not only AIT but also various pharmacologic treatments for allergic respiratory diseases, as well as for other chronic illnesses. The issue of non-adherence is an emerging and worldwide problem for chronic diseases and could be an important factor responsible for an overall decrease in treatment efficacy and increased rates of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. This review provides an overview of the different reasons that may account for the low adherence rate for AIT. Some of these reasons can be related to the patient’s age when they begin such therapy, the allergic disease being treated, and questions about the efficacy, costs, inconvenience, and safety of AIT. Well-structured educational programs,especially by healthcare professionals, the print media, and the Internet, are needed to improve adherence to AIT.

Types of sensitization to aeroallergens: definitions, prevalences and impact on the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory disease.

The type of allergic sensitization is of central importance in the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory allergic diseases. At least 10% of the general population (and more than 50% of patients consulting for respiratory allergies) are polysensitized. Here, we review the recent literature on (i) the concepts of polysensitization, paucisensitization, co-sensitization, co-recognition, cross-reactivity, cross-sensitization, and polyallergy, (ii) the prevalence of polysensitization and (iii) the relationships between sensitization status, disease severity and treatment strategies. In molecular terms, clinical polysensitization can be divided into cross-sensitization (also known as cross-reactivity, in which the same IgE molecule binds to several allergens with common structural features) and co-sensitization (the simultaneous presence of different IgEs binding to allergens that may not necessarily have common structural features). There is a strong overall association between sensitization in skin prick tests and total IgE values but there is debate as to whether IgE thresholds are useful guides to the presence or absence of clinical symptoms in individual cases. Molecular information from component-resolved techniques appears to be of value for diagnosis and treatment decisions. Polysensitization develops over time and is a risk factor for respiratory allergy (being associated with disease severity) and therefore has clinical relevance for treatment decisions. The subterm polysensitization has been defined as polysensitization to between two and four allergens. Polyallergy is defined as clinically confirmed allergy to two or more allergens. Single-allergen grass pollen allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is safe and effective in polysensitized patients, whereas multi-allergen AIT requires more supporting evidence. Given that AIT may be more efficacious in moderate-to-severe disease than in mild disease, polysensitization could be an indication for this type of treatment. There is a need for flowcharts or decision trees for choosing the allergens for AIT in polysensitized patients and polyallergic patients.

Sublingual immunotherapy in preschool children: an update

Allergen immunotherapy is a subject widely debated by allergists. Currently, there are controversial discussions focused on the sublingual route. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has so far been used in Europe, Asia and Australia for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. The minimum age to start specific immunotherapy with inhalant allergens in children has not been clearly established, and position papers discourage its use in children younger than 5 years of age. Nevertheless, it is known that SLIT efficacy is higher when SLIT is started at an earlier age. The aim of this review is to focus on studies in preschool children evaluating SLIT safety and efficacy, in order to improve this practice at an earlier age in childhood.

Réactivités croisées et rhinoconjonctivite allergique : conséquences pratiques sur l’immunothérapie par le comprimé de pollen de fléole des prés

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is currently the only causal treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is widely utilized for allergic rhinitis to grass pollen. Its effectiveness is due to the presence in the oral mucosa of immune cells with a regulatory phenotype, which is why SLIT is particularly suitable for inducing an antigen-specific tolerance with greater safety. Among the plants, it has been demonstrated in recent years many structural homologies. The existence of this high cross-reactivity can explain why allergens of timothy administered to a patient allergic to various grasses protect against all allergens in this family. Thus, recently, there appeared a new form of SLIT based on a tablet of allergen extract of timothy grass (Grazax®) used in order to “change the course of rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis triggered by pollen Grasses in adults and children (from 5 years) with clinical symptoms due to an allergy to grass pollen”. The clinical development of this tablet has indeed demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing allergic symptoms and consumption of symptomatic treatments for patients. After 5 years of availability and more than 50,000 year-equivalent treatments, the systematic review of the safety profile of this tablet is very favorable with less than two serious incidents per 1000 treatments. While the prevalence of allergic rhinitis has doubled in 10 years and that it affects 18% of adults and 11 to 27% of children in France, how will be use this new form of desensitization?

Allergen Immunotherapy in Allergic Respiratory Diseases: From Mechanisms to Meta-analyses

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) involves the repeated administration of allergenic extracts to atopic individuals over a period of 3 to 5 years either subcutaneously (SCIT) or sublingually (SLIT) for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases, including asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). In studies, SCIT and SLIT have been shown to improve existing symptoms of asthma and AR and to also have the capability to cause disease-modifying changes of the underlying atopic condition so as to prevent new allergic sensitization as well as arrest progression of AR to asthma. Recent evidence suggests that immunotherapy brings about these effects through actions that use T-regulatory cells and blocking antibodies such as IgG4 and IgA2, which can then result in an “immune deviation” from a T-helper (Th) 2 cell pattern to a Th1 cell pattern. Numerous meta-analyses and studies have been performed to evaluate the existing data among these studies, with the consensus recommendation favoring the use of immunotherapy because of its potential to modify existing diseases. Significant adverse reactions can occur with immunotherapy, including anaphylaxis and, very rarely, death. A primary factor in considering SIT is its potential to provide long-lasting effects that are able to be sustained well after its discontinuation. Given the significant burden these allergic diseases impose on the health-care system, SIT appears to be a cost-effective adjunctive treatment in modifying the existing disease state. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) involves the repeated administration of allergenic extracts to atopic individuals over a period of 3 to 5 years either subcutaneously (SCIT) or sublingually (SLIT) for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases, including asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). In studies, SCIT and SLIT have been shown to improve existing symptoms of asthma and AR and to also have the capability to cause disease-modifying changes of the underlying atopic condition so as to prevent new allergic sensitization as well as arrest progression of AR to asthma. Recent evidence suggests that immunotherapy brings about these effects through actions that use T-regulatory cells and blocking antibodies such as IgG4 and IgA2, which can then result in an “immune deviation” from a T-helper (Th) 2 cell pattern to a Th1 cell pattern. Numerous meta-analyses and studies have been performed to evaluate the existing data among these studies, with the consensus recommendation favoring the use of immunotherapy because of its potential to modify existing diseases. Significant adverse reactions can occur with immunotherapy, including anaphylaxis and, very rarely, death. A primary factor in considering SIT is its potential to provide long-lasting effects that are able to be sustained well after its discontinuation. Given the significant burden these allergic diseases impose on the health-care system, SIT appears to be a cost-effective adjunctive treatment in modifying the existing disease state.

98 Specific IGE and IGG Binding to Allergoids of Phleum pratense

BackgroundAllergoids were first used in the decades of the 60s and 70s of the last century as an effective treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. Allergoids can be modified with formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde. Modified allergens, or allergoids, decrease the risk of adverse reactions while administering higher allergen doses. The objective of this study was to analyse specific IgE and IgG binding to glutaraldehyde modified and non-modified allergen extracts of Phleum pratense.MethodsThe sera of 69 patients sensitized to P. pratense were tested. All these patients had signs and symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis with, or without, asthma in May and June of 2011. All these patients had positive skin prick tests to a standardized extract of P. pratense, and other grass species. Most patients were also sensitized to olive pollen. Specific IgE and IgG binding were analysed by direct ELISA against P. pratense native (non-modified) and allergoid extracts. Relative potencies were evaluated through ELISA inhibition assays, and the protein composition of non-modified and allergoid samples was determined by Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS).ResultsMean Specific IgE levels against the native extract was 16.68 ± 11.65 Units (U) and against the allergoid: 7.26 ± 8.24 U (P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney). On the other hand, mean specific IgG binding against the non-modified extract was 90.34 ± 75.57 U versus 76.19 ± 70.31 U against the allergoid (P = 0.16; Mann-Whitney). Linear regression coefficients obtained between immunoglobulin reactivity against both extracts were: r2 = 0.51 for specific IgE and r2 = 0.83 for specific IgG. An important decrease in the allergenic activity, measured by inhibition ELISA, was clearly observed. The MS/MS assay revealed the presence of the mayor allergen, and some isoforms, in non-modified and allergoid extracts.ConclusionsResults obtained demonstrate that the glutaraldehyde polymerization process induces an important decrease in specific IgE binding to allergoids of P. pratense while there are no significant differences in specific IgG binding. The allergenic composition of the P. pratense allergoid was equivalent to the non-modified pollen extract.