Treated Metastasis Control Research Articles

Outcomes for oligometastatic head and neck cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results from an international multi-institutional consortium.

We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT. Patients with OMD HNC (≤5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2016 at six institutions were included. Treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multivariable analysis (MVA). Forty-two patients with 84 HNC oligometastases were analyzed. The TMC rate at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 66%, with a median time to recurrence of 10.1 months. The median PFS and OS were 4.7 and 23.3 months. MVA identified a PTV point maximum (BED)10 > 100 Gy as a predictor of improved TMC (HR = 0.31, p = 0.034), and a cumulative PTV > 48 cc as having worse PFS (HR = 2.99, p < 0.001). Favorable TMC and OS was observed in OMD HNCs treated with SBRT.

Oligometastases Treated With an Elective Simultaneous Integrated Boost Have Reduced Marginal Recurrence Rates

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Radiation is increasingly used to treat oligometastatic patients (OM). Following metastasis directed radiation therapy, progression in nearby nodal basins or bones is common. We previously reported clinical outcomes of OM treated with an elective simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique delivering higher doses to known metastases and reduced doses to adjacent bones/nodal basins. Here we compare outcomes of OM receiving radiation to metastases alone (MA) versus those treated via an SIB. We hypothesized that use of SIB would maintain treated metastasis control (TMC) while reducing MR. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> OM patients with ≤5 active metastases treated with either SIB or MA at our IRB approved sites from 2013-2018 were analyzed for toxicities, pain control, and recurrence patterns. TMC was defined as absence of progression in high dose planning target volume (PTV). Marginal recurrence (MR) was defined as recurrence outside elective PTV, but within the adjacent bone or nodal chain. Distant recurrence (DR) was defined as any recurrence outside of the treatment PTVs not meeting other criteria. Outcome rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients treated with the two techniques were compared using the log rank test. <h3>Results</h3> 101 patients were treated to 90 SIB (58% nodal and 42% osseous) and 46 MA (22% nodal and 78% osseous) sites. The most common primary tumors were prostate (37%), lung (15%), and breast (7%). Median follow up among surviving patients was 24.6 months (range 1.4-71.0). Of the MA treated patients, doses ranged from 18 Gy in 1 fraction (22%) to 50 Gy in 10 fractions (50%). Most patients treated with SIB received 50 Gy to the treated metastases and 30 Gy to the elective PTV in 10 fractions (88%). No patients in either cohort experienced acute grade ≥3 toxicity. Late grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 3 SIB patients (vocal cord paralysis n = 1, vertebral body compression n = 2) and no MA patients. There was similar crude pain relief between cohorts: 82% with MA (9/11 patients reporting improved pain) and 86% with SIB (19/22). Crude MR were more frequent in the MA group 13% (n = 6) compared to SIB group 2% (n = 2). MR-free survival at 2 years was 87% (95% CI: 70%, 95%) in the MA group and 98% (95% CI: 87%, 99%) in the SIB group (<i>P</i> = 0.07). Crude TMC was 89% (41/46) in the MA group and 94% (85/90) in the SIB group. There were no significant differences found in DR-free survival (<i>P</i> = 0.24) or Disease-free survival (<i>P</i> = 0.4) and Overall survival (<i>P</i> = 0.26) between MA and SIB cohorts. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Both SIB and MA irradiation of OM achieved high rates of TMC and similar pain control, with a trend towards improved MR-free survival for OM treated with SIB. Although more late grade 3 toxicities were seen in the SIB cohort, these were mechanistically related to the high dose PTV and not the elective volume, with differences in treated metastasis location/characteristics. Further investigation of this technique with prospective trials is warranted.

Randomized phase I trial to evaluate Concurrent or Sequential Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and stereotactic body Radiotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (COSINR Study).

9616 Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides high rates of treated metastasis control, stimulates innate and adaptive immune pathways, and is safe in patients treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy following SBRT. We hypothesize that SBRT may improve outcomes for patients receiving immunotherapy through both direct cytoreduction and increased immunogenicity. Within this context, we conducted a phase 1 trial designed to evaluate the safety of combination immune checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab(N/Ip) plus sequential (Seq) or concurrent (Con) multisite SBRT (mSBRT) in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Methods: Treatment naïve patients (EGFR/ALK WT) with advanced NSCLC received SBRT to 1 to 4 metastases. Not all metastases were targeted, and metastases &gt; 65 mL were partially irradiated. Brain metastases were allowed on protocol, and those &gt; 3mm were treated prior to enrollment. SBRT dose varied by anatomic site and ranged from 45 to 50 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions with predefined dose de-escalation if excess dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Patients on Seq arm received N/Ip between 1-7 days after completion of SBRT. Patients in Con arm received N/Ip prior to completion of SBRT. N/Ip continued until progression, development of toxicity, or up to 2 years. Patients underwent pre- and post-treatment biopsy of one irradiated lesion. Results: A total of 35 patients (Seq/Con 19/16) were enrolled and evaluable for toxicity analysis (SBRT and at least 1 cycle N/Ip). Brain metastases were present in 27%. PD-L1 expression: 0% (16), 1-49% (10), &gt;50% (9). Median number of metastases treated with SBRT was 3.2. 6 patients experienced DLT (4 pneumonitis), resulting in dose reduction in central lung Seq cohort of the organs at risk (OAR) by 20%. Median PFS by RECIST (total/Seq/Con) was 5.9 mo, 95% CI: 4.9-13.1/ 6.2 mo, 95% CI: 3.5-12.6/ 5.9 mo, 95% CI: 3.1-18.0. RECIST best response was 11% CR, 57% PR, 6% SD, and 26% PD. Treatment past first progression was allowed, and time to second line therapy (chemotherapy) by arm (Seq/Con) was NR/17.5 months. Median OS has not been reached with median follow up of 15mo. PDL1 status did not impact PFS (p = 0.64) nor OS (p = 0.77). Conclusions: Multisite SBRT and concurrent N/Ip was well tolerated. Responses appear durable as median OS was not reached. Multimodality therapy with mSBRT and dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy resulted in impressive tumor control and clinical benefit with promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03223155 .

Multi-Site SBRT and Sequential Pembrolizumab: Treated Metastasis Control and Immune-Related Expression Predict Outcomes

Multi-Site SBRT and Sequential Pembrolizumab: Treated Metastasis Control and Immune-Related Expression Predict Outcomes

Hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous-Integrated Boost Technique for Limited Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.

Purpose: To perform a multi-institutional analysis following treatment of limited osseous and/or nodal metastases in patients using a novel hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy with simultaneous-integrated boost (HIGRT-SIB) technique.Methods: Consecutive patients treated with HIGRT-SIB for ≤5 active metastases at Duke University Medical Center or Durham Veterans' Affairs Medical Center between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed to determine toxicities and recurrence patterns following treatment. Most patients received 50 Gy to the PTVboost and 30 Gy to the PTVelect simultaneously in 10 fractions. High-dose treatment volume recurrence (HDTVR) and low-dose treatment volume recurrence (LDTVR) were defined as recurrences within PTVboost and PTVelect, respectively. Marginal recurrence (MR) was defined as recurrence outside PTVelect, but within the adjacent bone or nodal chain. Distant recurrence (DR) was defined as recurrences not meeting HDTVR, LDTVR, or MR criteria. Freedom from pain recurrence (FFPR) was calculated in patients with painful osseous metastases prior to HIGRT-SIB. Outcome rates were estimated at 12 months using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: Forty-two patients met inclusion criteria with 59 sites treated with HIGRT-SIB (53% nodal and 47% osseous). Median time from diagnosis to first metastasis was 31 months and the median age at HIGRT-SIB was 69 years. The most common primary tumors were prostate (36%), gastrointestinal (24%), and lung (24%). Median follow-up was 11 months. One acute grade ≥3 toxicity (febrile neutropenia) occurred after docetaxel administration immediately following HIGRT-SIB. Four patients developed late grade ≥3 toxicities: two ipsilateral vocal cord paralyzes and two vertebral compression fractures. The overall pain response rate was 94% and the estimated FFPR at 12 months was 72%. The estimated 12 month rate of HDTVR, LDTVR, MR, and DR was 3.6, 6.2, 7.6, and 55.8%, respectively. DR preceded MR, HDTVR, or LDTVR in each instance. The estimated 12 month probability of in-field and marginal control was 90.0%.Conclusion: Targeting areas at high-risk for occult disease with a lower radiation dose, while simultaneously boosting gross disease with HIGRT in patients with limited osseous and/or nodal metastases, has a high rate of treated metastasis control, a low rate of MR, acceptable toxicity, and high rate of pain palliation. Further investigation with prospective trials is warranted.

Long-term clinical outcomes and transcriptional analysis following partial and complete tumor SBRT plus pembrolizumab.

34 Background: Preclinical models support a combinatorial role of high-dose irradiation with immunotherapy. Multi-site stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with pembrolizumab (P) has been demonstrated as safe in advanced solid tumors. Here, we report extended follow-up of treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and describe transcriptional changes associated with TMC, PFS and OS. Methods: Patients (pts) with AST received 3-5 SBRT doses (30-50 Gy total dose) to 2-4 metastases based on anatomic location. Pembrolizumab (200 mg IV Q3W) began one week following the final SBRT. Mets &gt;65cc received partial-tumor SBRT. Response was measured by RECIST principles. TMC, PFS, and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Pre- and post-SBRT biopsies from 24 pts were assayed via RNA microarray. Results: 68 pts (140 mets) were enrolled. 18 pts (21 mets) received partial tumor SBRT. Median volume of partially irradiated tumors was 121cc vs 7cc of fully irradiated (p=0.001). Median follow-up was 8.4 months (mo; range 1.1-24.2). 1-year TMC was 89.6%. At 12 mo TMC of partial versus full tumor irradiation was not significantly different (p=0.09). On multiple Cox regression, metastasis size, histology, volume of irradiated tumor and PD-L1 status were not predictive of TMC, PFS or OS. However, irradiated metastasis response predicted OS (HR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; p = 0.003). Pts with irradiated met PR or CR had 17.8 mo median OS vs 9.1 and 3.4 in pts with mixed response or PD, respectively (p=0.005). Unsupervised transcriptional analysis of tumor biopsies demonstrated that the magnitude of DNA repair and innate/adaptive immune pathways induced in irradiated mets following SBRT was significantly associated with irradiated met response (p=0.009) and OS (p=0.007) to SBRT+P. Conclusions: Partial tumor SBRT+P approximates full tumor SBRT+P despite major differences in tumor volume. Transcriptional changes and clinical response of irradiated mets to SBRT+P are highly predictive of OS. Further research is needed to optimize immuno-radiotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02608385.

Classification for long-term survival in oligometastatic patients treated with ablative radiotherapy: A multi-institutional pooled analysis.

BackgroundRadiotherapy is increasingly used to treat oligometastatic patients. We sought to identify prognostic criteria in oligometastatic patients undergoing definitive hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT).MethodsExclusively extracranial oligometastatic patients treated with HIGRT were pooled. Characteristics including age, sex, primary tumor type, interval to metastatic diagnosis, number of treated metastases and organs, metastatic site, prior systemic therapy for primary tumor treatment, prior definitive metastasis-directed therapy, and systemic therapy for metastasis associated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treated metastasis control (TMC) were assessed by the Cox proportional hazards method. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified prognostic risk strata for OS and PFS based on pretreatment factors.Results361 patients were included. Primary tumors included non-small cell lung (17%), colorectal (19%), and breast cancer (16%). Three-year OS was 56%, PFS was 24%, and TMC was 72%. On multivariate analysis, primary tumor, interval to metastases, treated metastases number, and mediastinal/hilar lymph node, liver, or adrenal metastases were associated with OS. Primary tumor site, involved organ number, liver metastasis, and prior primary disease chemotherapy were associated with PFS.OS RPA identified five classes: class 1: all breast, kidney, or prostate cancer patients (BKP) (3-year OS 75%, 95% CI 66–85%); class 2: patients without BKP with disease-free interval of 75+ months (3-year OS 85%, 95% CI 67–100%); class 3: patients without BKP, shorter disease-free interval, ≤ two metastases, and age < 62 (3-year OS 55%, 95% CI 48–64%); class 4: patients without BKP, shorter disease-free interval, ≥ three metastases, and age < 62 (3-year OS 38%, 95% CI 24–60%); class 5: all others (3-year OS 13%, 95% CI 5–35%). Higher biologically effective dose (BED) (p < 0.01) was associated with OS.ConclusionsWe identified clinical factors defining oligometastatic patients with favorable outcomes, who we hypothesize are most likely to benefit from metastasis-directed therapy.

Radiation therapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Interest has been increasing in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with limited or oligometastatic disease. Surgery has historically been used to remove non-small cell lung cancer metastases, but recent developments including advanced radiotherapy planning and delivery techniques, often called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), has been associated with high rates of treated metastasis control. Therefore, given common comorbid disease, often precluding surgery, an increasing number of oligometastatic NSCLC patients are receiving radiation for ablation of all disease. Early results have reported favorable survival for some, with improved median survival, and approximately 25% alive long term. Patients with fewer metastases, those treated to all known cancerous sites, and longer disease-free intervals tend to have better outcomes. While promising, better clinical criteria are needed to optimize patient selection. The biologic underpinnings of the oligometastatic state are beginning to be demonstrated with specific microRNAs being associated with limited or no progression both in human samples and murine models. Clinical trials are ongoing to improve the techniques used to deliver radiotherapy for NSCLC oligometastases. Ideally, randomized studies will need to be conducted to demonstrate the utility of these treatments suggested by the uncontrolled studies to date. In lieu of these, data presented here may help guide clinicians as to appropriate patient selection.

Radical irradiation of extracranial oligometastases.

Advances in radiotherapy planning and delivery have been used to treat patients with limited metastatic disease. With these techniques, high rates of treated metastasis control and low toxicity have been reported. Some patients have long disease-free intervals after radiotherapy similar to those seen after surgical resection. Ongoing studies will determine the benefit of these irradiation techniques to treat limited metastases, identify appropriate candidates, and assist in integrating these treatments into management strategies for specific diseases.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Curative Treatment of Adrenal Metastases

The detection of oligometastatic adrenal metastases is increasing and there are limited data supporting the use of curative intent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat patients with limited metastatic disease with adrenal involvement. Therefore, we utilized a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients treated with SBRT for limited metastatic disease (≤5 sites) to identify patients with adrenal metastases. Patients were either treated on a three-fraction dose escalation protocol or a ten fraction off-protocol regimen. Outcomes including treated-metastasis control (TMC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Ten patients with 13 adrenal metastases were identified for this case series. The median follow-up was 14.9 months. No patient experienced grade 3 toxicity. The most common grade 1-2 acute toxicities were fatigue (80%) and GI toxicity (40%). One patient experienced late grade 2 adrenal insufficiency. Overall, the 1-year TMC rate was 73%, DC was 30%, and OS was 90%. Three treated adrenal metastases progressed, all receiving the lowest BED10 (43.2 Gy), corresponding to 24 Gy in 3 fractions. After treatment of adrenal metastases with SBRT, the median time to salvage chemotherapy was 5.3 months (range 1.0-38.8 months) and 1-year freedom from salvage chemotherapy was 44%. These results suggest that SBRT to adrenal metastases was tolerated with low toxicity in limited metastatic patients and control rates are promising. This study supports the growing body of literature treating patients with adrenal metastases with SBRT.

Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es): An American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline

PurposeTo systematically review the evidence for the radiotherapeutic and surgical management of patients newly diagnosed with intraparenchymal brain metastases. Methods and MaterialsKey clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based Guideline were identified. Fully published randomized controlled trials dealing with the management of newly diagnosed intraparenchymal brain metastases were searched systematically and reviewed. The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force levels of evidence were used to classify various options of management. ResultsThe choice of management in patients with newly diagnosed single or multiple brain metastases depends on estimated prognosis and the aims of treatment (survival, local treated lesion control, distant brain control, neurocognitive preservation).Single brain metastasis and good prognosis (expected survival 3 months or more): For a single brain metastasis larger than 3 to 4 cm and amenable to safe complete resection, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery (level 1) should be considered. Another alternative is surgery and radiosurgery/radiation boost to the resection cavity (level 3). For single metastasis less than 3 to 4 cm, radiosurgery alone or WBRT and radiosurgery or WBRT and surgery (all based on level 1 evidence) should be considered. Another alternative is surgery and radiosurgery or radiation boost to the resection cavity (level 3). For single brain metastasis (less than 3 to 4 cm) that is not resectable or incompletely resected, WBRT and radiosurgery, or radiosurgery alone should be considered (level 1). For nonresectable single brain metastasis (larger than 3 to 4 cm), WBRT should be considered (level 3).Multiple brain metastases and good prognosis (expected survival 3 months or more): For selected patients with multiple brain metastases (all less than 3 to 4 cm), radiosurgery alone, WBRT and radiosurgery, or WBRT alone should be considered, based on level 1 evidence. Safe resection of a brain metastasis or metastases causing significant mass effect and postoperative WBRT may also be considered (level 3).Patients with poor prognosis (expected survival less than 3 months): Patients with either single or multiple brain metastases with poor prognosis should be considered for palliative care with or without WBRT (level 3).It should be recognized, however, that there are limitations in the ability of physicians to accurately predict patient survival. Prognostic systems such as recursive partitioning analysis, and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment may be helpful. ConclusionsRadiotherapeutic intervention (WBRT or radiosurgery) is associated with improved brain control. In selected patients with single brain metastasis, radiosurgery or surgery has been found to improve survival and locally treated metastasis control (compared with WBRT alone).