Trauma Team Activation Research Articles

Effects of a Virtual Trauma Clinic on admissions and length of stay for minor to moderate trauma.

To investigate the feasibility of a Virtual Trauma Clinic (VTC) for patients with minor to moderate trauma, and evaluate patient satisfaction and outcomes. One hundred VTC patients were matched 1:1 with historical patients from the hospital trauma registry who received conventional care. Matching was based on age ± 5 years, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score ± 2, trauma team activation and day of week of presentation. VTC patients were sent surveys on experience and outcome measures. VTC was associated with reduced average hospital length of stay for admitted patients by 1.81 days (95% CI = -2.82, -0.79; P = 0.001) and reduced hospital admissions (odds ratio 0.26; 95% CI = 0.14, 0.48; P < 0.001). There was an avoidance of 199 inpatient bed days in total, with no trauma-related readmissions within 30 days post-hospital discharge. 92% of respondents (n = 22) rated the care they received from VTC as excellent or good. Patient-reported outcome surveys showed overall improvement in functional domains but evidence of ongoing disability, with persistent issues of pain and psychological distress at 1 month post-injury. Patients with minor to moderate trauma have ongoing care needs with high rates of pain, psychological distress and disability remaining prevalent long after discharge. VTC provided an innovative strategy for hospital avoidance with high levels of patient satisfaction and no adverse effects on safety. The overall quality of care for these patients was enhanced through the provision of standardised, patient-centred and multidisciplinary follow-up.

Accuracy of the Quebec Pre-Hospital Triage Scale (EQTPT) in Predicting the Need for Trauma Team Activation: A Retrospective Administrative Data Study

Background: Trauma team activation at a Level 1 trauma centre In Quebec, Canada, is primarily at the emergency department’s staff discretion. Trauma teams may be activated prehospital, based on information provided by field paramedics or in the emergency department based on the patient’s condition on arrival. In this study, we examined over and undertriage rates based on present trauma team activation criteria. We also examined if trauma team activation, for those patients solely meeting pre-hospital major trauma criteria, would result in significant overactivation of the trauma team. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective medical record review. Primary ambulance transport reports from May 15, 2018 to December 31, 2020, were screened to identify patients aged ≥16 years who met pre-hospital trauma triage criteria to bypass community hospitals to arrive directly at the Level 1 trauma centre. We examined pre-hospital triage criteria, trauma team involvement, Injury Severity Scores (ISS) and final disposition. Patients were evaluated for over and undertriage and rates were compared to the rates assuming all patients were to have a trauma team activation. We considered patients overtriaged if they had a full trauma team activation but had an ISS &lt;12 and were discharged from the emergency department. Undertriage was defined as any patient with an ISS ³12 and did not have a trauma team activation. Results: Of the 371 patients who met study inclusion criteria, 123 (33.3%) did not meet trauma team activation criteria, while 214 (57.7%) had a trauma team activation. Of these, 49 patients (13.2%) were undertriaged and 31 patients (8.4%) were overtriaged and 25.8% of the major trauma patients (ISS ³ 12) were undertriaged. A trauma team activation for all meeting field triage criteria increased overtriage to 25.3% and brought undertriage rates to 0%, with statistically significant differences based on the Wilcoxon signed ranks test (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: In this study, undertriage rates were well above 5%. Trauma team activation, based on local field trauma triage criteria adapted from the CDC-ACSCOT field triage criteria, eliminates undertriage and keeps overtriage rates below 35%. This research suggests that field triage criteria accurately predict major trauma and the need for the involvement of the trauma team and that the condition of the trauma patient in the pre-hospital setting is accurately predicting the need for advanced trauma care

Trauma team activation criteria for potential major trauma in the adult population: a narrative review

Trauma team activation criteria for potential major trauma in the adult population: a narrative review

Pediatric Trauma Management in Switzerland: Insights from a Nationwide Survey.

To explore and analyze pediatric trauma care practices across designated pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) in Switzerland. The focus is on reception, trauma team activation (TTA), trauma team composition, patient volumes, and infrastructure. A national online survey was conducted among all eight PTCs in Switzerland with an 18- item questionnaire. The survey investigated organizational aspects, criteria for TTA, patient volume, and communication modalities in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). All PTCs responded, revealing varied methods of TTA, and with reception of major trauma either within PEDs or at adjacent adult trauma facilities. Trauma team composition and activation criteria also differ among centers, with nonsurgeons often leading the teams and anesthesia as a default for airway management. TTA criteria vary widely, with the most common being the request of prehospital crew (62.5%) and physician discretion (50%). Trauma resuscitation is predominantly led by PED attendings (75%). The survey provides insights into the state of pediatric trauma care in Switzerland and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary teams and the variability in trauma management practices, which are often tailored to local circumstances. Despite the limitations of self-reported data and the small sample size due to the country's size, the results suggest that a national trauma registry would help to evaluate and optimize pediatric trauma care protocols.

Prehospital undertriage of older injured patients in western Switzerland: an observational cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe ageing of the population is leading to an increase in the number of traumatic injuries and represents a major challenge for the future. Falls represent the leading cause of Emergency department admission in older people, with injuries ranging from minor to severe multiple injuries. Older injured patients are more likely to be undertriaged than younger patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of undertriage in older patients with particular emphasis on access to trauma centres and resuscitation rooms.MethodsRetrospective observational cross-sectional study based on data prospectively collected from prehospital electronic records including all patients ≥ 18 years for whom an ambulance or helicopter was dispatched between 1 January 2018 and 31 April 2023 due to a trauma. The primary outcome, admission to the resuscitation room of the regional trauma centre with trauma team activation, was assessed by age. Multivariate logistic regression was used to control for known confounders and to test for plausible effect modifiers.ResultsEmergency Medical Services treated 37,906 injured patients. Older patients ≥ 75 years represented 17,719 patients (47%). Admission to trauma centre with trauma team activation was lower in older patients, N = 121 (1%) compared to N = 599 (5%) in younger patients, p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio: 0.33 (0.24–0.45); p < 0.001. Undertriage increased by twofold with age ≥ 75; OR: 1.81 (1.04–3.15); p value < 0.001. Undertriaged patients were older, more likely to be female, to have low energy trauma and to be located farther from the regional trauma centre.ConclusionOlder injured patients were at increased risk of undertriage and non-trauma team activation admission, especially if they were older, female, had head injury without altered consciousness and greater distance to regional trauma centre.

Clinical effect on major trauma patients during simultaneous or overlapping presentations at an urban level I trauma center in Korea

Objective: Overcrowding in an emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) of the trauma center (TC) is an important issue for timely acute health care of a critically injured patient. Accumulated scientific evidence has indicated the negative influence of overcrowding to the process and clinical outcome of trauma care. Method: The institutional trauma registry at an urban level I TC was retrospectively evaluated for 5 years (2018–2022). Major trauma was defined as an injury severity score (ISS) of >15. We determined simultaneous or overlapping presentations of major trauma (SOMT) in two or more patients with ISS of >15 who presented within a 4-h time window. When only two patients were included within a single time window, they were classified as SOMT-2, whereas when three or more patient clusters were identified in a single time window, they were classified as SOMT-3. The outcome measurement included process and clinical variables, such as trauma team activation (TTA) ratio, ED length of stay (LOS), time to blood product transfusion (TF), time to emergency surgery or intervention (ESI), ICU LOS, and mortality. Result: A total of 2,815 patients were included, of which 39.6% (N = 1,116) classified as SOMT.The SOMT group had lower TTA ratio than the non-SOMT group (69.4% vs. 73.4%, P = 0.022). The TTA ratio exhibited a decreasing trend in non-SOMT, SOMT-2, and SOMT-3 groups (P = 0.006). The time to TF was significantly delayed in the SOMT group (129 vs. 91 min, P < 0.001). Conclusion: SOMT regularly occurs and results in fewer trauma team activation and a delayed time to blood transfusion. The current intensive trauma care system should be strategically modified to improve critical trauma care and enhance disaster preparedness.

Predicting the critical administration threshold in bleeding trauma patients.

Delays in promptly recognizing and appropriately managing hemorrhagic injuries contribute to preventable trauma related deaths nationwide. We sought to identify patient variables available at the time of emergency department arrival associated with meeting the critical administration threshold. We conducted a trauma registry review from September 2016 to March 2020 of trauma team activations at The Ottawa Hospital, a Level 1 Trauma Center. Our primary outcome was the frequency of meeting the critical administration threshold. Secondary outcomes included time to critical administration threshold, 24-h all-cause mortality, and 30-day all-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors independently associated with meeting the critical administration threshold. We assessed 762 patients, of which 78 (10.2%) met the critical administration threshold. The median time to critical administration threshold was 28.9min. Mortality at 24h occurred in 58 (7.6%) patients. Four variables available upon patient arrival predicted the critical administration threshold, including systolic blood pressure ≤ 90mmHg (OR 6.6; 95% CI 3.7-12.0), Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8 (OR 5.9; 95% CI 3.2-10.6), heart rate ≥ 100 beats/minute (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.4-8.1), and respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths/min (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-4.0). We identified four clinical variables readily available to physicians upon patient arrival associated with meeting the critical administration threshold: systolic blood pressure ≤ 90mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8, heart rate ≥ 100 beats/minute, and respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths/min. Patients presenting with any of these clinical parameters should prompt physicians to consider ordering blood products immediately.

Trauma team activation for older patients with pelvic fractures: Are current criteria adequate?

The present study aimed to identify the impact of age on current trauma team activation (TTA) processes and outcomes for patients with pelvic fractures. Adult patients with moderate and/or severe pelvic fractures (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 2) between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2021 were included utilising major trauma hospital data in Queensland. Characteristics of older (age ≥ 65) and younger patients including TTA, interventions and outcomes were examined. Multivariate analysis was used to determine factors associated with TTA in older patients. Data from 637 patients was included. Despite comparable injury severity, a TTA was activated in fewer older people (older: 65% vs. younger: 79%, P < 0.001). Older patients had more falls leading to the trauma presentation (54.4% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.001), with higher initial systolic BP (131 vs. 125 mmHg, P = 0.04). Outcomes were worse for older people, with greater rates of in-hospital complications (27.2% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.004), and longer hospital stays (12 vs. 8 days, P = 0.04). Fewer older patients could be discharged independently to home (46.3% vs. 74.5%, P < 0.001). In older patients, falls and haemodynamic parameters were strongly associated with the reduced likelihood of TTA (fall mechanism [odds ratio (OR)] 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.74; P = 0.01; systolic BP [OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99; P = 0.03], heart rate [OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.95-0.99; P = 0.02]). Current TTA criteria based on higher energy mechanisms and traditional vital sign thresholds are inadequate for identifying injury in older patients. Sensitive triage criteria and increased clinician awareness are required to enhance injury recognition and improve outcomes in older trauma patients.

In Search of the Truth: Choice of Ground Truth for Predictive Modeling of Trauma Team Activation in Pediatric Trauma.

Assigning trauma team activation (TTA) levels for trauma patients is a classification task that machine learning models can help optimize. However, performance is dependent on the "ground-truth" labels used for training. Our purpose was to investigate 2 ground truths, the Cribari matrix and the Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI), for labeling training data. Data were retrospectively collected from the institutional trauma registry and electronic medical record, including all pediatric patients (age <18 years) who triggered a TTA (January 2014 to December 2021). Three ground truths were used to label training data: (1) Cribari (Injury Severity Score >15 = full activation), (2) NFTI (positive for any of 6 criteria = full activation), and (3) the union of Cribari+NFTI (either positive = full activation). Of 1,366 patients triaged by trained staff, 143 (10.47%) were considered undertriaged using Cribari, 210 (15.37%) using NFTI, and 273 (19.99%) using Cribari+NFTI. NFTI and Cribari+NFTI were more sensitive to undertriage in patients with penetrating mechanisms of injury (p = 0.006), specifically stab wounds (p = 0.014), compared with Cribari, but Cribari indicated overtriage in more patients who required prehospital airway management (p < 0.001), CPR (p = 0.017), and who had mean lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores on presentation (p < 0.001). The mortality rate was higher in the Cribari overtriage group (7.14%, n = 9) compared with NFTI and Cribari+NFTI (0.00%, n = 0, p = 0.005). To prioritize patient safety, Cribari+NFTI appears best for training a machine learning algorithm to predict the TTA level.

342 Enhanced Trauma Team Activations Reduces Elderly Major Trauma Patients’ Length of Stay by 17.7% (3 Days): A Multi-Centre 8-Year Pre and Post Intervention Study in Trauma Units

342 Enhanced Trauma Team Activations Reduces Elderly Major Trauma Patients’ Length of Stay by 17.7% (3 Days): A Multi-Centre 8-Year Pre and Post Intervention Study in Trauma Units

Isolated injury, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and transfer from another facility are associated with delay in antibiotic administration: a retrospective study of 963 patients with open fractures.

To identify factors associated with delays in administration and pharmacy and nursing preparation of antibiotics for patients with open fractures. Retrospective review. Level I trauma center. Nine hundred sixty-three adults with open fractures administered antibiotics. Delay in antibiotic administration greater than 66 minutes from arrival and significant pharmacy-related and nursing-related delay. Isolated injury, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and transfer from another facility were associated with delay in antibiotic administration greater than 66 minutes. Injury Severity Score, transfer, and trauma team activation were associated with pharmacy-related or nursing-related delay. Interventions to reduce antibiotic administration time for open fractures should focus on early identification of open fractures and standardization of antibiotic protocols to ensure timely administration even in complex or resource-scarce care situations. Prognostic level III.

New Recommendations for the Care of Severely Injured Patients: Revision of the S3 Guideline on Treatment of Polytrauma/Severe Injuries.

Die 3. Überarbeitung der S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung wurde unter der Federführung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) von insgesamt 26 Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen durchgeführt und stellt eine umfassende Aktualisierung der Handlungsempfehlungen zur Schwerverletzten-Versorgung auf Basis neuer wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse und Studien dar. Die Leitlinie enthält 332 Kernempfehlungen unterschiedlicher Empfehlungsgrade und dazugehörige Erläuterungen, die Expertenwissen und über 2400 zitierte Literaturstellen berücksichtigen und somit das höchste Niveau (S3) einer Leitlinie erfüllen. Die Änderungen, insbesondere zur Schockraumalarmierung, sind für den Rettungsdienst von besonderer Bedeutung. Zwei neue Kapitel mit Empfehlungen für die Blutstillung und Schmerzbehandlung in der prähospitalen Versorgung wurden hinzugefügt, insgesamt bleibt die Leitlinie ein wichtiger Standard für Entscheidungsfindungen bei Diagnostik und Therapie von Schwerverletzten.

Prospective validation of a hospital triage predictive model to decrease undertriage: an EAST multicenter study

BackgroundTiered trauma team activation (TTA) allows systems to optimally allocate resources to an injured patient. Target undertriage and overtriage rates of <5% and <35% are difficult for centers to achieve,...

English

Background: For patients sustaining major trauma, decreasing time to definitive care remains a primary goal. Specialized trauma team involvement is essential for coordinating the emergency department care of complex major trauma patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the timing of trauma team involvement impacts length of stay and time to definitive care in the emergency department. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective medical record review, including patients meeting Quebec pre-hospital triage criteria for major trauma from May 15, 2018 to December 31, 2020. We assessed time from patient arrival until departure from the resuscitation room, time to CT scan, time to disposition, and overall length of emergency department stay. Patients were grouped according to the timing of trauma team activation (TTA) as (1) pre-hospital notification, (2) on arrival in the emergency department, (3) receiving a trauma consult only, or (4) no trauma team involvement. Mean times and standard deviations were calculated, and group differences were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the independent sample Mann-Whitney U test. Results: We identified 371 patients meeting our inclusion criteria; there were no differences between groups in mean time spent in the resuscitation room based on the timing of trauma team involvement (45-51 minutes, p=0.422). A trauma team activation with pre-hospital notification was associated with a statistically significant shorter time to CT scan (62-81 minutes, p=0.010), time to disposition (6:37-13:41, p&lt;0.001), and total emergency department length of stay (9:22-23:16 hours: minutes, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Appropriate trauma team activation improves performance indicators used to evaluate the quality of care in the emergency department. This research suggests that pre-hospital trauma team activation should be considered the standard of care for all patients meeting pre-hospital field triage criteria for major trauma. Keywords: trauma, triage, pre-hospital, trauma team activation, trauma quality indicators

Time Delay in Motor Vehicle Accident Arrival: A Critical Analysis of Trauma Team Activation.

Introduction This research aims to investigate the role of time since trauma (TST) in refining trauma team activation (TTA) criteria within a level I trauma center. We analyze the association between TST and post-emergency department (ED) disposition, proposing new insights for the enhancement of TTA criteria. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset comprising 3,693 patients presenting to a level I trauma center following motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) from 2016 to 2021. Data from a trauma registry, encompassing time of injury, time of ED arrival, TTA status, and post-ED disposition, were utilized. TST was calculated as the difference between the time of injury and the time of ED arrival. Patients that received TTA, full or partial, were categorized based on TST (less than one hour, one to two hours, and two or more hours). Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (version 3.8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results Of the 1,261 patients meeting the criteria, 98.3% received TTA, with decreasing TTA rates observed with increasing TST (p = 0.0076). A significant association was found between TST and post-ED disposition for patients who received TTA (p = 0.0007). Compared to the other TST groups, a higher proportion of patients with a TST of two or more hours were admitted,sent to the intensive care unit (ICU), and sent to the operating room (OR). Conclusion The study indicates a statistically significant relationship between TST and TTA rates, challenging our assumptions about the decreased need for TTA over time. While a longer TST was associated with a lower percentageof TTA, patients with a TST of two or more hours demonstrated increased rates of admission, ICU utilization, and surgical interventions. This suggests that TTA criteria may benefit from refinement to include patients with longer TST. Acknowledging study limitations, such as a small sample size and retrospective design, this research contributes valuable insights into potential considerations for optimizing trauma care protocols.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on interhospital transfer of patients with major trauma in Korea: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundInterhospital transfer (IHT) is necessary for providing ultimate care in the current emergency care system, particularly for patients with severe trauma. However, studies on IHT during the pandemic were limited. Furthermore, evidence on the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on IHT among patients with major trauma was lacking.MethodThis retrospective cohort study was conducted in an urban trauma center (TC) of a tertiary academic affiliated hospital in Daegu, Korea. The COVID-19 period was defined as from February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021, whereas the pre-COVID-19 period was defined as the same duration of preceding span. Clinical data collected in each period were compared. We hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted IHT.ResultsA total of 2,100 individual patients were included for analysis. During the pandemic, the total number of IHTs decreased from 1,317 to 783 (− 40.5%). Patients were younger (median age, 63 [45–77] vs. 61[44–74] years, p = 0.038), and occupational injury was significantly higher during the pandemic (11.6% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.025). The trauma team activation (TTA) ratio was higher during the pandemic both on major trauma (57.3% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.006) and the total patient cohort (22.2% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001). In the COVID-19 period, duration from incidence to the TC was longer (218 [158–480] vs. 263[180–674] minutes, p = 0.021), and secondary transfer was lower (2.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.025).ConclusionWe observed that the total number of IHTs to the TC was reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, TTA was more frequent, particularly among patients with major trauma. Patients with severe injury experienced longer duration from incident to the TC and lesser secondary transfer from the TC during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Evaluation of Prehospital Undertriage in Relation to Trauma Team Activation-Results from a Prospective Study in 12 Level one German Trauma Centers.

Background/Objective: This prospective, multicenter observational cohort study was carried out in 12 trauma centers in Germany and Switzerland. Its purpose was to evaluate the rate of undertriage, as well as potential consequences, and relate these with different Trauma Team Activation Protocols (TTA-Protocols), as this has not been done before in Germany. Methods: Each trauma center collected the data during a three-month period between December 2019 and February 2021. All 12 participating hospitals are certified as supra-regional trauma centers. Here, we report a subgroup analysis of undertriaged patients. Those included in the study were all consecutive adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with acute trauma admitted to the emergency department of one of the participating hospitals by the prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) within 6 h after trauma. The data contained information on age, sex, trauma mechanism, pre- and in-hospital physiology, emergency interventions, emergency surgical interventions, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and death within 48 h. Trauma team activation (TTA) was initiated by the emergency medical services. This should follow the national guidelines for severe trauma using established field triage criteria. We used various denominators, such as ISS, and criteria for the appropriateness of TTA to evaluate the undertriage in four groups. Results: This study included a total of 3754 patients. The average injury severity score was 5.1 points, and 7.0% of cases (n = 261) presented with an injury severity score (ISS) of 16+. TTA was initiated for a total of 974 (26%) patients. In group 1, we evaluated how successful the actual practice in the EMS was in identifying patients with ISS 16+. The undertriage rate was 15.3%, but mortality was lower in the undertriage cohort compared to those with a TTA (5% vs. 10%). In group 2, we evaluated the actual practice of EMS in terms of identifying patients meeting the appropriateness of TTA criteria; this showed a higher undertriage rate of 35.9%, but as seen in group 1, the mortality was lower (5.9% vs. 3.3%). In group 3, we showed that, if the EMS were to strictly follow guideline criteria, the rate of undertriage would be even higher (26.2%) regarding ISS 16+. Using the appropriateness of TTA criteria to define the gold standard for TTA (group 4), 764 cases (20.4%) fulfilled at least one condition for retrospective definition of TTA requirement. Conclusions: Regarding ISS 16+, the rate of undertriage in actual practice was 15.3%, but those patients did not have a higher mortality.

Role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio at the time of arrival to the emergency room as a predictor of short-term mortality in trauma patients with severe trauma team activation.

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been studied as a prognostic factor for various diseases and traumas. This study examined the utility of PLR as a tool for predicting 30-day mortality in patients experiencing severe trauma. This study included 139 patients who experienced trauma and fulfilled ≥1 criteria for activation of the hospital's severe trauma team. Patients were divided into non-survivor and survivor groups. Mean PLR values were compared between the groups, the optimal PLR cut-off value was determined, and mortality and survival analyses were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 26.0. The threshold of statistical significance was P<0.05. There was a significant difference in mean (±standard deviation) PLR between the non-survivor (n=36) and survivor (n=103) groups (53.4±30.1 vs. 89.9±53.3, respectively; P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed an optimal PLR cut-off of 65.35 (sensitivity, 0.621; specificity, 0.694, respectively; area under the ROC curve, 0.742), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups. PLR can be calculated quickly and easily from a routine complete blood count, which is often performed in the emergency department for individuals who experience trauma. The PLR is useful for predicting 30-day mortality in trauma patients with severe trauma team activation.

Characteristics and demography of low energy fall injuries in patients > 60 years of age: a population-based analysis over a decade with focus on undertriage

BackgroundAn increasing group of elderly patients is admitted after low energy falls. Several studies have shown that this patient group tends to be severely injured and is often undertriaged.MethodsPatients > 60 years with low energy fall (< 1 m) as mechanism of injury were identified from the Stavanger University Hospital trauma registry. The study period was between 01.01.11 and 31.12.20. Patient and injury variables as well as clinical outcome were described. Undertriage was defined as patients with a major trauma, i.e., Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, without trauma team activation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables.ResultsOver the 10-year study period, 388 patients > 60 years with low energy fall as mechanism of injury were identified. Median age was 78 years (IQR 68–86), and 53% were males. The location of major injury was head injury in 41% of the patients, lower extremities in 19%, and thoracic injuries in 10%. Thirty-day mortality was 13%. Fifty percent were discharged to home, 31% to nursing home, 9% in hospital mortality, and the remaining 10% were transferred to other hospitals or rehabilitation facilities. Ninety patients had major trauma, and the undertriage was 48% (95% confidence interval, 38 to 58%).ConclusionsPatients aged > 60 years with low energy falls are dominated by head injuries, and the 30-day mortality is 13%. Patients with major trauma are undertriaged in half the cases mandating increased awareness of this patient group.

Characteristics of migrant workers admitted from the emergency department.

Emergency department (ED) admissions for non-work-related injuries and illnesses in the migrant worker (MW) population in Singapore are not well studied. We aimed to examine ED triage acuity and bills associated with admissions among MW for non-trauma, workplace injury (WI) trauma, and non-workplace injury (NWI) trauma. In this retrospective observational study, we included all work permit holders admitted to hospital via the ED of three public hospitals from 1 May 2016 to 31 October 2016. Data obtained from medical records included demographics, triage acuity and bill information. There were 1,750 unique patients accounting for 1,788 admissions. The median age was 33 (interquartile range 27-40) years, with a male predominance of 67%. Trauma accounted for 33% (n = 595) of admissions, and of these, 73% (n = 433) were due to WI. Admissions for NWI, as compared to WI, were more likely to present as high acuity P1 cases (43% vs 24%, P < 0.001), be conveyed by ambulance (49% vs 24%, P < 0.001) and result in trauma team activations (29% vs 7%, P < 0.001). More NWI admissions (22%, 36/162) exceeded the insurance claim limit under prevailing healthcare policies, as compared to WI admissions (3%, 13/433). Migrant workers are admitted to hospital for non-trauma conditions more frequently than for trauma. Non-workplace injury trauma may be severe. Non-trauma and NWI admissions can result in large bills that exceed mandatory insurance coverage. Recent changes to healthcare policy governing MW to allow copayment of large bills and better access to primary care are timely.