Trauma Quality Improvement Program Research Articles

Whole Blood and Blood Component Resuscitation in Trauma: Interaction and Association with Mortality.

Evaluate the interaction between whole blood (WB) and blood component resuscitation in relation to mortality following trauma. WB is increasingly available in civilian trauma resuscitation, and it is typically transfused concomitantly with blood components. The interaction between WB and blood component transfusions is unclear. Adult trauma patients with a shock index >1 who received ≥4 combined units of red blood cells (RBC) or WB within 4 hours across 501 United States trauma centers were included using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database. The associations between 1)WB resuscitation and mortality, 2)WB to total transfusion volume ratio (WB:TTV) and mortality, 3)balanced blood component transfusion in the setting of combined WB and component resuscitation and mortality were evaluated with multivariable analysis. A total of 12,275 patients were included (WB: 2,884 vs. component-only: 9,391). WB resuscitation was associated with lower odds of 4-hour (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.81 [0.68-0.97]), 24-hour, and 30-day mortality compared to component-only. Higher WB:TTV ratios were significantly associated with lower 4-hour, 24-hour, and 30-day mortality, with a 13% decrease in odds of 4-hour mortality for each 10% increase in the WB:TTV ratio (0.87 [95%CI:0.80 - 0.94]). Balanced blood component transfusion was associated with significantly lower odds of 4-hour (aOR: 0.45 [95%CI: 0.29 - 0.68]), 24-hour, and 30-day mortality in the setting of combined WB and blood component resuscitation. WB resuscitation, higher WB:TTV ratios, and balanced blood component transfusion in conjunction with WB were associated with lower mortality in trauma patients presenting in shock requiring 4 units of RBC and/or WB transfusion within 4 hours of arrival.

Early Vital Sign Thresholds Associated with 24-Hour Mortality among Trauma Patients: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Study - CORRIGENDUM.

Early Vital Sign Thresholds Associated with 24-Hour Mortality among Trauma Patients: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Study - CORRIGENDUM.

Is there a need for fresh frozen plasma and platelet transfusion in trauma patients receiving submassive transfusion?

BackgroundBlood transfusions have become a vital intervention in trauma care. There are limited data on the safety and effectiveness of submassive transfusion (SMT), that is defined as receiving less than...

Two big bones, one big decision: when to fix bilateral femur fractures

PurposeFor polytrauma patients with bilateral femoral shaft fractures (BFSF), there is currently no consensus on the optimal timing of surgery. This study assesses the impact of early (≤ 24 hours) versus delayed (>24 hours) definitive fixation on clinical outcomes, especially focusing on concomitant versus staged repair. We hypothesized that early definitive fixation leads to lower mortality and morbidity rates. MethodsThe 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients aged ≥16 years with BFSF who underwent definitive fixation. Early definitive fixation (EDF) was defined as fixation of both femoral shaft fractures within 24 hours, delayed definitive fixation (DDF) as fixation of both fractures after 24 hours, and early staged fixation (ESF) as fixation of one femur within 24 hours and the other femur after 24 hours. Propensity score matching and multilevel mixed effects regression models were used to compare groups. Results1,118 patients were included, of which 62.8% underwent EDF. Following propensity score matching, 279 balanced pairs were formed. EDF was associated with decreased overall morbidity (12.9% vs 22.6%, p=0.003), lower rate of deep venous thrombosis (2.2% vs 6.5%, p=0.012), a shorter ICU LOS (5 vs 7 days, p<0.001) and a shorter hospital LOS (10 vs 15 days, p<0.001). When compared to DDF, early staged fixation (ESF) was associated with lower rates of ventilator acquired pneumonia (0.0% vs 4.9%, p=0.007), but a longer ICU LOS (8 vs 6 days, p=0.004). Using regression analysis, every 24-hour delay to definitive fixation increased the odds of developing complications by 1.05, postoperative LOS by 10 hours and total hospital LOS by 27 hours. ConclusionEarly definitive fixation (≤ 24 hours) is preferred over delayed definitive fixation (>24 hours) for patients with bilateral femur shaft fractures when accounting for age, sex, injury characteristics, additional fractures and interventions, and hospital level. Although mortality does not differ, overall morbidity and deep venous thrombosis rates, and length of hospital and intensive care unit stay are significantly lower. When early definitive fixation is not possible, early staged repair seems preferable over delayed definitive fixation.

Impact of Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Cardiac pacemaker implantation may be indicated in patients with refractory bradycardia following a cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). However, evidence about the impact of this procedure on outcomes is lacking. We planned a study to assess whether the implantation of a pacemaker would decrease mortality and hospital resource utilization in patients with CSCI. Adult patients with CSCI in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into "pacemaker" and "non-pacemaker" groups, and their baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. A total of 6774 cases were analyzed. The pacemaker group showed higher in-hospital rates of cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay than the non-pacemaker group. Nevertheless, pacemaker placement was associated with a significant decrease in mortality (4.2% vs 26.0%, P < .01). Patients with CSCI requiring a pacemaker placement had better survival than those treated without a pacemaker. Pacemaker implantation should be highly considered in patients who develop refractory bradycardia after CSCI.

Characterizing Trauma Patients with Delays in Orthopaedic Process Measures.

Early operative intervention in orthopaedic injuries is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. Relevant process measures (e.g. femoral shaft fixation <24 hours) are used in trauma quality improvement programs to evaluate performance. Currently, there is no mechanism to account for patients who are unable to undergo surgical intervention (i.e. physiologically unstable). We characterized the factors associated with patients who did not meet these orthopaedic process measures. A retrospective cohort study of patients from 35 ACS-COT verified Level 1 and Level 2 trauma centers was performed utilizing quality collaborative data (2017-2022). Inclusion criteria were adult patients (≥18 years), ISS ≥5, and a closed femoral shaft or open tibial shaft fracture classified via the Abbreviated Injury Scale version 2005 (AIS2005). Relevant factors (e.g. physiologic) associated with a procedural delay >24 hours were identified through a multivariable logistic regression and the effect of delay on inpatient outcomes was assessed. A sub-analysis characterized the rate of delay in "healthy patients". We identified 5,199 patients with a femoral shaft fracture and 87.5% had a fixation procedure, of which 31.8% had a delay, and 47.1% of those delayed were "healthy." There were 1,291 patients with an open tibial shaft fracture, 92.2% had fixation, 50.5% had an irrigation and debridement and 11.2% and 18.7% were delayed, respectively. High ISS, older age and multiple medical comorbidities were associated with a delay in femur fixation, and those delayed had a higher incidence of complications. There is a substantial incidence of surgical delays in some orthopaedic trauma process measures that are predicted by certain patient characteristics, and this is associated with an increased rate of complications. Understanding these factors associated with a surgical delay, and effectively accounting for them, is key if these process measures are to be used appropriately in quality improvement programs. Level III; Therapeutic/Care Management.

Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Pregnancy: Higher Rates of Severe Abdominal Injuries.

Previous studies suggest increased abdominal girth in obese individuals provides a "cushion effect," against severe abdominal trauma. In comparison, the unique anatomic/physiological condition of pregnancy, such as the upward displacement of organs by an expanding uterus, may decrease risk of abdominal injury. However, increased overall blood volume and vascularity of organs during pregnancy raise concerns for increased bleeding and potentially more severe injuries. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate whether the "cushion effect" observed in obese patients extends to pregnant trauma patients (PTPs). We hypothesized a lower risk of blunt solid organ injury (BSOI) (liver, spleen, and kidney) in pregnant vs non-pregnant blunt trauma patients. The 2020-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program was queried for all female blunt trauma patients (age<50 years) involved in motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). We compared pregnant vs non-pregnant patients. The primary outcomes were incidence of BSOI, and severity of abdominal trauma defined by abbreviated injury scale (AIS). From 94,831 female patients, 2598 (2.7%) were pregnant. When compared to non-pregnant patients, PTPs had lower rates of liver (5.5% vs 7.6%, P < .001) and kidney (1.8% vs 2.6%, P = .013) injury. However, PTPs had higher rates of serious (13.4% vs 9.0%, P < .001) and severe abdominal injury (7.5% vs 4.3%, P < .001). BSOI occurred at a lower rate in PTPs compared to non-PTPs; however, contrary to the "cushion effect" observed in obese populations, pregnant women had a higher rate of severe abdominal injuries. These data support comprehensive evaluations for PTPs presenting after a MVC. IV (therapeutic).

Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score: A Simple and Reliable Predictor of Mortality in Trauma Patients Undergoing Urgent/Emergent Surgery.

Objective: Many current trauma mortality prediction tools are either too intricate or rely on data not readily available during a trauma patient's initial evaluation. Moreover, none are tailored to those necessitating urgent or emergent surgery. Our objective was to design a practical, user-friendly scoring tool using immediately available variables, and then compare its efficacy to the widely-known Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Methods: The adult 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried to identify patients ≥18 years old undergoing any urgent/emergent operation (direct from Emergency Department to operating room). Patients were divided into derivation and validation groups. A three-step methodology was used. First, multiple logistic regression models were created to determine risk of death using only variables available upon arrival. Second, the weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive an easily calculated Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score (IOTAS). We then validated IOTAS using AUROC and compared it to RTS. Results: From 249208 patients in the derivation-set, 14635 (5.9%) died. Age ≥65, Glasgow Coma Scale score <9, hypotension (SBP <90mmHg), and tachycardia (>120/min) on arrival were identified as independent predictors for mortality. Using these, the IOTAS was structured, offering scores between 0-8. The AUROC for this was .88. A clear escalation in mortality was observed across scores: from 4.4% at score 1 to 60.5% at score 8. For the validation set (250182 patients; mortality rate 5.8%), the AUROC remained consistent at .87, surpassing RTS's AUROC of .83. Conclusion: IOTAS is a novel, accurate, and now validated tool that is intuitive and efficient in predicting mortality for trauma patients requiring urgent or emergent surgeries. It outperforms RTS, and thereby may help guide clinicians when determining the best course of action in patient management as well as counseling patients and their families.

Clinical Implications of Over- and Under-Triage Using Need for Trauma Intervention and Cribari Indices.

Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI) score was proposed to help identify injured trauma patients while minimizing under (UT) and over triage (OT). Using a national database, we aimed to describe UT and OT of NFTI vs standard Cribari method (CM) and hypothesized triage sensitivity remains poor. The 2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried. Demographics, mechanism, verification level, interfacility transfer (IF), and level of activation were collected. Patients were stratified by both NFTI [+ vs -] and CM [Injury severity score (ISS) < 15 vs > 15]. UT was defined as NFTI + or ISS >15 without full trauma activation. 1,030,526 patients were identified in TQIP. 84,969 were UT and 97,262 were OT using NFTI while 94,020 were UT and 108,823 were OT using CM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of NFTI is 49%, 89%, 45%, and 90%, respectively vs 43%, 87%, 39%, and 89% of CM, respectively. Age was higher in the UT group using both scores (52 vs 42, P < .0001 and 54 vs 42, P < .0001, respectively). Using MLR, level 2 and 3 verification, blunt mechanism, female, IF, and older age were associated with UT in both NFTI and CM. Level 1 verification, penetrating mechanism, male, no IF, and younger age were associated with OT. Current prehospital triage criteria have poor sensitivity for identifying severely injured trauma patients by both NFTI and CM. UT increases as age of the patient increases. Further studies are needed to improve triage.

Early Vital Sign Thresholds Associated with 24-Hour Mortality among Trauma Patients: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Study.

Identifying patients at imminent risk of death is critical in the management of trauma patients. This study measures the vital sign thresholds associated with death among trauma patients. This study included data from patients ≥15 years of age in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database. Patients with vital signs of zero were excluded. Documented prehospital and emergency department (ED) vital signs included systolic pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and calculated shock index (SI). The area under the receiver operator curves (AUROC) was used to assess the accuracy of these variables for predicting 24-hour survival. Optimal thresholds to predict mortality were identified using Youden's Index, 90% specificity, and 90% sensitivity. Additional analyses examined patients 70+ years of age. There were 1,439,221 subjects in the 2019-2020 datasets that met inclusion for this analysis with <0.1% (10,270) who died within 24 hours. The optimal threshold for prehospital systolic pressure was 110, pulse rate was 110, SI was 0.9, and respiratory rate was 15. The optimal threshold for the ED systolic was 112, pulse rate was 107, SI was 0.9, and respiratory rate was 21. Among the elderly sub-analysis, the optimal threshold for prehospital systolic was 116, pulse rate was 100, SI was 0.8, and respiratory rate was 21. The optimal threshold for ED systolic was 121, pulse rate was 95, SI was 0.8, and respiratory rate was 0.8. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and SI offered the best predictor of mortality among trauma patients. The SBP values predictive of mortality were significantly higher than the traditional 90mmHg threshold. This dataset highlights the need for better methods to guide resuscitation as initial vital signs have limited accuracy in predicting subsequent mortality.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Rib Fracture Patients in Michigan.

This study aims to compare outcomes of rib fracture patients with and without COVID-19 in Michigan. Data from the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program (MTQIP) identified adults hospitalized from January 1, 2020, to October 31, 2022, with at least one rib fracture and a completed COVID-19 test on admission. Patients were propensity score matched 1:1 using 20 variables. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were mortality, ventilator days, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, pneumonia, and ventilator-assisted pneumonia (VAP). 13,305 total patients were identified. 232 patients matched into both the COVID+ and COVID- groups. COVID was associated with increased LOS (7days vs. 5days, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups when evaluating secondary outcomes. Our study indicates that although COVID-19 infection is associated with increased LOS, COVID may not contribute to additional morbidity or mortality in traumatic rib fracture patients.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Severity and Outcomes in Penetrating Versus Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury Propensity Matched Cohorts.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health challenge; however, penetrating brain injury (PBI) remains under-represented in evidence-based knowledge and research efforts. This study utilized data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to investigate outcomes of PBI as compared with clinical-severity-matched non-penetrating or blunt TBI. A total of 1765 patients with PBI were 1:1 propensity score-matched for clinical severity with blunt TBI patients. The intent of PBI was self-inflicted in 34.1% of the cases, and the mechanism was firearm-inflicted in 89.1%. Mortality was found to be significantly more common in PBI than in the severity- matched TBI cohort (33.9% vs. 14.3 %, p < 0.001) as was unfavorable outcome. Mortality was mediated by withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WOLST) 30% of the time, and WOLST occurred earlier (median 3 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001) in PBI. Increased rate of mortality was observed with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of <11 in PBI as compared with <7 in blunt TBI. In conclusion, PBI patients exhibited higher mortality rates and unfavorable outcomes; one third of excess mortality was mediated by WOLST. The study also brings into question the applicability of the conventional TBI classification, based on GCS, in PBI. We emphasize the need to address the observed disparities and better understand the distinctive characteristics and mechanisms underlying PBI outcomes to improve patient care and reduce mortality.

785 Variability in Withdrawal of Life Sustaining Treatment Decision for Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Analysis of 510 North American Trauma Centers

INTRODUCTION: Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment (WLST) in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is complex with a paucity of standardized guidelines to inform practice patterns. We hypothesized presence of variability in WLST decision-making across centers, which could have important implications for equitable trauma care provision. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized data from adult severe TBI patients treated at trauma centers participating in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017-2020. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was used to adjust for patient, injury and hospital attributes influencing WLST. Residual between-center variability was characterized using the median odds ratio. Disparate WLST practices were further assessed by ranking centers' tendencies for WLST and assessing mortality between quartiles. RESULTS: We identified a total of 85511 subjects with severe TBI treated across 510 trauma centers, of which 20,300 (24%) had WLST. Patient-level factors associated with increased likelihood of WLST were advanced age, white race, treatment in a non-profit trauma center or self-pay/ Medicare insurance status (compared to private insurance). Black race was associated with reduced tendency for WLST. Higher severity intracranial and extracranial injuries also increased likelihood for WLST.After adjustment for patient and hospital attributes, the median odds ratio was 1.44 (1.40-1.48 95%CI), suggesting substantial residual variation in WLST between centers. When centers were grouped into quartiles by their propensity for WLST, there was a 1.37 (1.30-1.42 95%CI) increased adjusted odds of mortality between fourth versus first quartile centers. CONCLUSIONS: We highlighted the presence of disparate WLST practice patterns between trauma centers after adjustment for case-mix and hospital attributes. These findings highlight a strong need for examination of center-level factors contributing to heterogenous WLST practices to ultimately improve equity of care provision for severe TBI patients.

926 End of Life Decision-Making Inequities for Pediatric Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

INTRODUCTION: The decision to withdraw life sustaining treatment (WLST) for pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging for clinicians and families with limited evidence quantifying existing practices. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized data collected from trauma centers through the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017-2020. We included pediatric patients (&lt;19 years) with severe TBI and a documented decision for WLST. We utilized a random intercept multilevel logistic regression model to quantify patient, injury and hospital characteristics influencing WLST. In order to quantify the impact of disparate WLST practices on mortality, we ranked centers by their conditional random intercept computed quartile-specific adjusted mortality. RESULTS: We identified a total of 9803 children with severe TBI treated across 515 trauma centers, of which 1003 (10.2%) had WLST. Patient-level factors associated with increased likelihood of WLST were young age (&lt;3 years), higher severity intracranial and extracranial injuries and mechanism of injury related to firearms. Following adjustment for patient and hospital attributes, the median odds ratio was 1.54 (95% CI: 1.50-1.57), reflecting residual variation in WLST between centers. When centers were grouped into quartiles by their propensity for WLST, adjusted mortality was higher for fourth compared to first quartile centers (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.47-1.90). CONCLUSIONS: Several patient and injury factors were associated with WLST decision-making for pediatric patients with severe TBI. We also showed variation in WLST practices between trauma centers after adjustment for case mix; these differences were associated with differing quartile-specific adjusted mortality rates. Taken together, these findings highlight the presence of care provision inequities among North American trauma centers regarding WLST practice patterns for pediatric patients with severe TBI.

Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism and Eventual Amputation in Traumatic Femoral and Iliac Vein Injuries: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

Iliac and femoral venous injuries represent a challenging dilemma in trauma surgery with mixed results. Venous restoration of outflow (via repair or bypass) has been previously identified as having higher rates of VTE (venous thromboembolism) compared to ligation. We hypothesized that rates of VTE and eventual amputation were similar whether restoration of venous outflow vs ligation was performed at initial operation. Patients in the 2019-2021 National Trauma Data Bank with iliac and femoral vein injuries were abstracted and analyzed. The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital lower extremity amputation and VTE. A total of 2642 patients with operatively managed iliac and femoral vein injuries were identified VTE was found in 10.8% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed and identified bowel injury, higher ISS, older age, open repair, and longer time to VTE prophylaxis initiation as independent predictors of VTE. Amputation was required in 4.2% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified arterial or nerve injury, femur or tibia fracture, venous ligation, percutaneous intervention, fasciotomy, bowel injury, and higher ISS as independent factors of amputation. Venous restoration was not an independent predictor of VTE. Venous ligation on index operation was the only modifiable independent predictor of amputation identified on regression analysis.

A Geospatial Analysis of Hand Trauma Care: A Statewide Cross-Sectional Study.

Traumatic hand injuries often present with high acuity, but little is known about the influence of geospatial and socioeconomic factors on the timely delivery of care. This cross-sectional study used the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, a state-wide registry with 35 level I or II trauma centers. Adult patients sustained hand trauma requiring urgent operative treatment between 2016 and 2021. Zip codes of injury location were linked with the corresponding percentile score on the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a comprehensive measure of neighborhood disadvantage. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine associations of patient, injury and geospatial characteristics with the odds of sustaining acute hand trauma and time to operative treatment. Among 1,826 patients, the odds of sustaining acute hand trauma based on the ADI followed a bimodal distribution. Female sex, smoking, obesity, work-related injury and residence in a minor city were associated with increased odds, while younger age, comorbidities, and rural residence were associated with decreased odds. For 388 patients who underwent surgery within 48 hours, time to treatment was significantly increased in the highest ADI quintile, for patients who underwent fracture fixation, and for those with severe global injury severity. Multi-system injuries, moderate global injury severity and direct admission to an orthopaedic service were associated with shorter times to treatment. Patients in areas with greater neighborhood disadvantage may experience delayed operative care after acute hand trauma. This study highlights the importance of considering underserved populations and geospatial factors when determining the allocation of hand surgery resources. Prognostic Level III.

Quantifying the Association Between Surgical Spine Approach and Tracheostomy Timing After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Recent evidence suggests earlier tracheostomy is associated with fewer complications in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). This study aims to evaluate the influence of spine surgical approach on the association between tracheostomy timing and in-hospital adverse events treating patients with complete cervical SCI. This retrospective cohort study was performed using Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 2017 to 2020. All patients with acute complete (American Spinal Injury Association-A) cervical SCI who underwent tracheostomy and spine surgery were included. Tracheostomy timing was dichotomized to early (within 1 week after surgery) and delayed (more than 1 week after surgery). Primary outcome was the occurrence of major in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes included occurrences of immobility-related complications, surgical-site infection, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and time on mechanical ventilation. The study included 1592 patients across 358 trauma centers. Mean time to tracheostomy from surgery was 8.6 days. A total of 495 patients underwent anterior approach, 670 underwent posterior approach, and 427 underwent combined anterior and posterior approach. Patients who underwent anterior approach were significantly more likely to have delayed tracheostomy compared with posterior approach (53% vs 40%, P < .001). Early tracheotomy significantly reduced major in-hospital complications (odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.84) and immobility complications (odds ratio = 0.78, 95% CI 0.6-1.0). Those undergoing early tracheostomy spent 6.0 (95% CI -8.47 to -3.43) fewer days in hospital, 5.7 (95% CI -7.8 to -3.7) fewer days in the intensive care unit, and 5.9 (95% CI -8.2 to -3.7) fewer days ventilated. Surgical approach had no significant negative effect on the association between tracheostomy timing and the outcomes of interest. Earlier tracheostomy for patients with cervical SCI is associated with reduced complications, length of stay, and ventilation time. This relationship appears independent of the surgical approach. These findings emphasize that tracheostomy need not be delayed because of the SCI treatment approach.

Contemporary Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Adults: An Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Registry

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies for blunt splenic injuries in adult patients. MethodsPatients 18 years and older with blunt splenic injuries registered via the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) were identified. Management strategies initiated within 24 hours of hospital presentation were classified as watchful waiting, embolization, surgery, or combination therapy. Patients were stratified by injury grade. Linear models estimated each strategy’s effect on hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and mortality. ResultsOf 81,033 included patients, 86.3%, 10.9%, 2.5%, and 0.3% of patients received watchful waiting, surgery, embolization, and combination therapy, respectively. Among patients with low-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (9.4 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .30) and ICU LOS (5.0 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .44). Among patients with high-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (8.7 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .12) and ICU LOS (4.5 days, Q < .001, Cohen’s d = .23). Among patients with low- and high-grade injuries, the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality associated with surgery compared with embolization were 4.02 (Q < .001) and 4.38 (Q < .001), respectively. ConclusionsAmong patients presenting with blunt splenic injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS, shorter ICU LOS, and lower risk for mortality.

When is it safe to start thromboprophylaxis after splenic angioembolization?

BackgroundThromboprophylaxis after blunt splenic trauma is complicated by the risk of bleeding, but the risk after angioembolization is unknown. We hypothesized that earlier thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with increased bleeding complications without mitigating venous thromboembolism events. MethodsAll blunt trauma patients who underwent splenic angioembolization within 24 hours of arrival were identified from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2017 to 2019. Cases with <24-hour length of stay, other serious injuries, and surgery before angioembolization were excluded. Venous thromboembolism was defined as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Bleeding complications were defined as splenic surgery, additional embolization, or blood transfusion after thromboprophylaxis initiation. Data were compared with χ2 analysis and multivariate logistic regression at P < .05. ResultsIn 1,102 patients, 84% had American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade III to V splenic injuries, and 73% received thromboprophylaxis. Splenic surgery after angioembolization was more common in those with thromboprophylaxis initiation within the first 24 hours (5.7% vs 1.7%, P = .007), whereas those with the initiation of thromboprophylaxis after 72 hours were more likely to have a pulmonary embolism (2.3% vs 0.2%, P = .001). Overall, venous thromboembolism increased considerably when thromboprophylaxis was initiated after day 3. In multivariate analysis, time to thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with bleeding (odds ratio 0.74 [95% confidence interval 0.58–0.94]) and venous thromboembolism complications (odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval 1.20–1.81]). ConclusionThis national study evaluates bleeding and thromboembolic risk to elucidate the specific timing of thromboprophylaxis after splenic angioembolization. Initiation of thromboprophylaxis between 24 and 72 hours achieves the safest balance in minimizing bleeding and venous thromboembolism risk, with 48 hours particularly serving as the ideal time for protocolized administration.

Comparison of Vital Sign Cutoffs to Identify Children With Major Trauma

Vital signs are essential components in the triage of injured children. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) physiologic criteria are frequently used for trauma assessments. To evaluate the performance of ATLS and PALS criteria vs empirically derived criteria for identifying major trauma in children. This retrospective cohort study used 2021 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) data contributed by US trauma centers. Included encounters involved pediatric patients (aged <18 years) with severe injury, excluding those who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, were receiving mechanical ventilation, or were transferred from another facility. Data were analyzed between April 9 and December 21, 2023. Initial hospital vital signs, including heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Major trauma, determined by the Standard Triage Assessment Tool, a composite measure of injury severity and interventions performed. Multivariable models developed from PALS and ATLS vital sign criteria were compared with models developed from the empirically derived criteria using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Validation of the findings was performed using the 2019 TQIP dataset. A total of 70 748 patients (median [IQR] age, 11 [5-15] years; 63.4% male) were included, of whom 3223 (4.6%) had major trauma. The PALS criteria classified 31.0% of heart rates, 25.7% of respiratory rates, and 57.4% of SBPs as abnormal. The ATLS criteria classified 25.3% of heart rates, 4.3% of respiratory rates, and 1.1% of SBPs as abnormal. Among children with all 3 vital signs documented (64 326 [90.9%]), PALS had a sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI, 87.1%-89.3%) and specificity of 25.1% (95% CI, 24.7%-25.4%) for identifying major trauma, and ATLS had a sensitivity of 54.5% (95% CI, 52.7%-56.2%) and specificity of 72.9% (95% CI, 72.6%-73.3%). The empirically derived cutoff vital sign z scores had a sensitivity of 80.0% (95% CI, 78.5%-81.3%) and specificity of 48.7% (95% CI, 48.3%-49.1%) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 70.9% (95% CI, 69.9%-71.8%), which was similar to PALS criteria (69.6%; 95% CI, 68.6%-70.6%) and greater than ATLS criteria (65.4%; 95% CI, 64.4%-66.3%). Validation using the 2019 TQIP database showed similar performance to the derivation sample. These findings suggest that empirically derived vital sign criteria strike a balance between the sensitivity of PALS criteria and the specificity of ATLS criteria in identifying major trauma in children. These criteria may help to identify children at greatest risk of trauma-related morbidity and mortality.