Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database Research Articles

Time to tracheostomy impacts overall outcomes in patients with cervical spinal cord injury.

The morbidity associated with cervical spine injury increases in the setting of concomitant cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). A significant proportion of these patients require placement of a tracheostomy. However, it remains unclear if timing to tracheostomy following traumatic CSCI can impact outcomes. The aim of our study was to characterize outcomes associated with tracheostomy timing following traumatic CSCI. We performed a 5-year (2010-2014) analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database and included all adult (age, ≥18 years) trauma patients who had traumatic CSCI and received tracheostomy. Patients were subdivided into two groups: early tracheostomy (ET) (≤4 days from initial intubation) and late tracheostomy (LT) (>4 days). Outcome measures included respiratory complications, ventilator-free days, intensive care unit-free days and hospital length of stay, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. A total of 5,980 patients were included in the study, of which 1,010 (17%) patients received ET, while 4,970 (83%) patients received LT. Mean age was 46 years, and 73% were men. In terms of CSCI location, 48% of the patients had high CSCI (C1-C4), while 52% had low CSCI (C5-C7). Patients in the ET group had lower rates of respiratory complications (30% vs. 46%, p = 0.01), higher ventilator-free days (13 days vs. 9 days; p = 0.02), intensive care unit-free days (11 days vs. 8 days; p = 0.01), and a shorter hospital length of stay (22 days vs. 29 days; p = 0.01) compared with those in the LT group. On regression analysis, ET was associated with lower rates of respiratory complications in patients with high CSCI (odds ratio, 0.55 [0.41-0.81]) and low CSCI (odds ratio, 0.93 [0.72-0.95]). However, no association was found between time to tracheostomy and in-hospital mortality. Early tracheostomy regardless of CSCI level may lead to improved outcomes. Quality improvement efforts should focus on defining the optimal time to tracheostomy and considering ET as a component of SCI management bundle. Therapeutic, level IV.

Isolated rib cage fractures in the elderly: Do all patients belong to the intensive care unit? A retrospective nationwide analysis.

Western Trauma Association guidelines recommend admitting patients 65 years or older with two or more rib fractures diagnosed by chest radiograph to the intensive care unit (ICU). Increased use of computed tomography has led to identification of less severe, "occult" rib fractures. We aimed to evaluate current national trends in disposition of older patients with isolated rib cage fractures and to identify characteristics of patients initially admitted to the ward who failed ward management. A retrospective cohort study of patients 65 years or older with isolated two or more blunt rib cage fractures using the 2010 to 2016 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. Ward failure was defined as patients initially admitted to the ward with subsequent need for unplanned ICU admission or intubation. Multivariable analyses were derived to study the independent predictors of failure of ward management. Propensity score matching sub-analysis was used to assess outcomes in patients admitted to the ward versus ICU. There were 5,021 patients included in the analysis. Of these patients, 1,406 (28.0%) were admitted to the ICU. On multivariable analysis, age was an independent predictor of ICU admission. Of the 3,577 patients admitted directly to the ward, 38 (1.1%) patients required unplanned intubation or ICU admission. Independent predictors of failure of ward management included chronic renal failure (odds ratio [OR], 7.20; p ≤ 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.50-20.76), traumatic pneumothorax (OR, 8.70; p = 0.008; 95% CI, 1.76-42.93), concurrent sternal fracture (OR, 6.52; p ≤ 0.001; 95% CI, 2.53-16.80), drug use disorder (OR, 6.58; p = 0.032; 95% CI, 1.17-36.96), and emergency department oxygen requirement or oxygen saturation less than 95% (OR, 2.38; p = 0.018; 95% CI, 1.16-4.86). Mortality was higher in patients with delayed ICU care versus patients with successful ward disposition (21.1% vs. 0.8%; p < 0.001). Our results suggest that the majority of isolated rib cage fractures in older patients are safely managed on the ward with exceedingly low ward failure rates (1.1%). Patients with failure of ward management have significantly higher mortality, and we have identified predictors of failing the ward. Therapeutic/Care Management, level IV; Prognostic III.

Deaths following withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy: Opportunities for quality improvement?

Mortality is an important trauma center outcome. With many patients initially surviving catastrophic injuries and a growing proportion of geriatric patients, many deaths might occur following withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST). We utilized the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database to explore whether deaths following WLST might be preventable and to evaluate the impact of excluding patients who died following WLST on hospital performance. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data derived from American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Adult trauma patients treated at Levels I and II centers in 2016 were included. Three cohorts of deceased patients were created to assess differences in hospital performance. The first included all deaths, the second included only those who died without WLST, and the third included deaths without WLST and deaths with WLST where death was preceded by a major complication. Hospitals were ranked based on their observed-to-expected mortality ratio calculated using each of the three decedent cohorts. Outcomes included absolute change in hospital ranking and change in performance outlier status between cohorts. We identified 275,939 patients treated at 447 centers who met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality was 6.9% (n = 19,145). Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy preceded 43.6% (n = 8,343) of deaths and 23% (n = 1,920) of these patients experienced a major complication before death. The median absolute change in hospital performance rank between the first and second cohort was 58 (p < 0.001), between the first and third cohort was 44 (p < 0.001), and between the second and third cohort was 23 (p < 0.001). Hospital performance outlier status changed significantly between cohorts. The exclusion of patients who die following WLST from benchmarking efforts leads to a major change in hospital ranks. Potentially preventable deaths, such as those following a major complication, should not be excluded. Epidemiological study, level III.

Angioembolization in intra-abdominal solid organ injury: Does delay in angioembolization affect outcomes?

Angioembolization (AE) is an integral component in multidisciplinary algorithms for achieving hemostasis in patients with trauma. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommends that interventional radiologists be available within 30 minutes to perform emergent AE. However, the impact of the timing of AE on patient outcomes is still not well known. We hypothesized that a delay in AE would be associated with increased mortality and higher blood transfusion requirements in patients with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury. A 4-year (2013-2016) retrospective review of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. We included adult patients (age, ≥18 years) with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury who underwent AE within 4 hours of hospital admission. Patients who underwent operative intervention before AE were excluded. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. The secondary outcome was blood product transfusions. Patients were grouped into four 1-hour intervals according to their time from admission to AE. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to accommodate patient differences. We analyzed 1,009,922 trauma patients, of which 924 (1 hour, 76; 1-2 hours, 224; 2-3 hours, 350; 3-4 hours, 274) were deemed eligible. The mean ± SD age was 44 ± 19 years, and 66% were male. The mean ± SD time to AE was 144 ± 54 minutes, and 92% of patients underwent AE more than 1 hour after admission. Overall 24-hour mortality was 5.2%. On univariate analysis, patients receiving earlier AE had decreased 24-hour mortality (p = 0.016), but no decrease in blood products transfused. On regression analysis, every hour delay in AE was significantly associated with increased 24-hour mortality (p < 0.05). Delayed AE for hemorrhagic control in blunt trauma patients with an intra-abdominal solid organ injury is associated with increased 24-hour mortality. Trauma centers should ensure timeliness of interventional radiologist availability to prevent a delay in vital AE, and it should be a focus of quality improvement projects. Prognostic, level III.

Alcohol Use Disorder Is Bad for Broken Ribs: A Nationwide Analysis of 19,638 Patients With Rib Fractures

BackgroundAlcohol use disorder (AUD) has deleterious effects on many organ systems. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of AUD on outcomes in patients with rib fractures. We hypothesized that AUD is associated with increased risk adverse outcomes. MethodsWe performed a 2013-2014 retrospective analysis of all adult trauma patients diagnosed with rib fractures from the American College of Surgeons–Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. We excluded patients who were acutely intoxicated with alcohol. Patients were stratified into two groups: AUD + and AUD -. A 1:1 ratio propensity score matching for demographics, admission vitals, injury severity, smoking status, operative intervention, and number of rib fractures was performed. Outcome measures were in-hospital complications, mortality, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and ventilator days. ResultsWe matched 19,638 patients (AUD +:9,819, AUD -:9819). Mean age was 53 ± 22y, and median injury severity score was 15[10-20]. Matched groups were similar in age (P = 0.18), smoking status (P = 0.82), injury severity score (P = 0.28), chest Abbreviated Injury Scale (P = 0.24), and number of rib fractures (2[1-4] versus 2[1-4], P = 0.86). Alcoholic patients had higher rates of pneumonia (18.1% versus 9.2%, P < 0.01), unplanned intubation (18.5% versus 9.7, P < 0.001), sepsis (10.8% versus 6.3%, P < 0.001), acute respiratory distress syndrome (12.2% versus 7.4%, P < 0.001), and mortality (8.0 versus 5.7%, P < 0.001). Patients with AUD spent more days in the hospital and intensive care unit . There was no difference in ventilator days between the two groups. ConclusionsPatients with AUD and rib fractures had higher rates of adverse events than patients without AUD. Early identification of patients with rib fractures with AUD may allow better resource allocation and help improve outcomes. Level of evidenceLevel III prognostic.

Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy: A Nationwide Analysis of Outcomes and Predictors of Futility

BackgroundMost studies on emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) suffer from either small sample size or unclear inclusion criteria. We sought to assess ERT outcomes and predictors of futility using a nationwide database. MethodsUsing a novel and comprehensive algorithm of combinations of specific International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision procedure codes denoting the multiple steps of an ERT (e.g., thoracotomy, pericardiotomy, cardiac massage) performed within the first 60 min of patient arrival, we identified ERT patients in the 2010-2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. We defined the primary outcome as survival to discharge and the secondary outcomes as hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, number of complications, and discharge destination. Univariate then backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of mortality. Multiple imputations by chained equations were performed when appropriate, as additional sensitivity analyses. ResultsOf 1,403,470 patients, 2012 patients were included. The median age was 32, 84.0% were males, 66.7% had penetrating trauma, the median Injury Severity Score was 26, and 87.5% presented with signs of life (SOL). Of the 1343 patients with penetrating injury, 72.9% had gunshot wounds and 27.1% had stab wounds. The overall survival rate was 19.9%: 26.0% in penetrating trauma (stab wound 45.6% versus gunshot wound 18.7%; P < 0.001) and 7.6% in blunt trauma. Independent predictors of mortality were aged 60 y and older (odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.26-5.82; P = 0.011), blunt trauma (odds ratio, 4.03; 95% CI, 2.72-5.98; P < 0.001), prehospital pulse <60 bpm (odds ratio, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.73-6.79; P < 0.001), emergency department pulse <60 bpm (odds ratio, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.47-8.94; P < 0.001), and no SOL on emergency department arrival (odds ratio, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.08-12.24; P = 0.037). Blunt trauma was associated with a higher median hospital LOS compared with penetrating trauma (28 d versus 13 d; P < 0.001), higher median intensive care unit LOS (19 d versus 6 d; P < 0.001), higher median number of complications (2 versus 1; P = 0.006), and more likelihood to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility instead of home (72.6% versus 28.7%; P < 0.001). ERT had the highest survival rates in patients younger than 60 y who present with SOL after penetrating trauma. None of the patients with blunt trauma who presented with no SOL survived. ConclusionsThe survival rates of patients after ERT in recent years are higher than classically reported, even in the patient with blunt trauma. However, ERT remains futile in patients with a blunt trauma presenting with no SOL.

The 5 and 11 Factor Modified Frailty Indices are Equally Effective at Outcome Prediction Using TQIP

BackgroundThe 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) and the 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) are equally effective in predicting adverse outcomes in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The similarly structured American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database has not been studied with these two frailty indices. We hypothesized that the mFI-5 and mFI-11 could similarly predict adverse outcomes with TQIP data. MethodsThe mFI-5 and mFI-11 were calculated for each patient comprising our institutional TQIP registry (2016-2018). Spearman ρ was calculated to assess correlations between the two indices across multiple predefined TQIP patient cohorts. Complications were stratified by frailty score for each index. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Injury Severity Score were created to assess each mFI's association with any complication and discharge dispositions (home, facility, and expired). ResultsThere were 8467 patients. Spearman ρ was >0.9 (P < 0.0001) for all patient cohorts except elderly, elderly blunt multisystem, and isolated hip fractures. Increasing frailty scores for both mFIs were associated with greater rates of acute kidney injury (P < 0.0001), myocardial infarction (P < 0.001), severe sepsis (P < 0.05), unplanned return to the intensive care unit (P < 0.0001), and unplanned intubation (P < 0.0001). On separate multivariable logistic regressions, the mFI-5 and mFI-11 were each predictive of any complication (P < 0.0001) and a facility discharge (P < 0.001). Neither the mFI-5 nor the mFI-11 were associated with mortality (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe mFI-5 and mFI-11 are highly correlated across several TQIP patient cohorts. They also are both predictive of complications and discharge dispositions; however, neither index can predict mortality. Given its ease of use, the mFI-5 may be a better option for identifying frail patients and predicting adverse outcomes at the point of care in trauma.

Withdrawal of Life-supporting Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

There are limited data on which factors affect the critical and complex decision to withdraw life-supporting treatment (LST) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). To determine demographic and clinical factors associated with the decision to withdraw LST in patients with sTBI. This retrospective analysis of inpatient data from more than 825 trauma centers across the US in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from January 2013 to December 2015 included adult patients with sTBI and documentation of a decision regarding withdrawal of LST (WLST). Data analysis was conducted in September 2019. Factors associated with WLST in sTBI. A total of 37931 patients (9817 women [25.9%]) were included in the multivariable analysis; 7864 (20.7%) had WLST. Black patients (4806 [13.2%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.72; P < .001) and patients of other race (4798 [13.2%]; OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P < .001) were less likely than white patients (26 864 [73.7%]) to have WLST. Patients from hospitals in the Midwest (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.20; P = .002) or Northeast (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.13-1.34; P < .001) were more likely to have WLST than patients from hospitals in the South. Patients with Medicare (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.43-1.69; P < .001) and self-pay patients (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.47; P < .001) were more likely to have WLST than patients with private insurance. Older patients and those with lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, higher Injury Severity Scores, or craniotomy were generally more likely to have WLST. Withdrawal of LST was more likely for patients with functionally dependent health status (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.58; P = .01), hematoma (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.27; P < .001), dementia (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.08-1.53; P = .004), and disseminated cancer (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.07-3.82; P < .001) than for patients without these conditions. Withdrawal of LST is common in sTBI and socioeconomic factors are associated with the decision to withdraw LST. These results highlight the many factors that contribute to decision-making in sTBI and demonstrate that in a complex and variable disease process, variation based on race, payment, and region presents as a potential challenge.

Isolated severe blunt traumatic brain injury: effect of obesity on outcomes.

Obesity has been widely reported to confer significant morbidity and mortality in both medical and surgical patients. However, contemporary data indicate that obesity may confer protection after both critical illness and certain types of major surgery. The authors hypothesized that this "obesity paradox" may apply to patients with isolated severe blunt traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried for patients with isolated severe blunt TBI (head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score 3-5, all other body areas AIS < 3). Patient data were divided based on WHO classification levels for BMI: underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obesity class 1 (30.0-34.9 kg/m2), obesity class 2 (35.0-39.9 kg/m2), and obesity class 3 (≥ 40.0 kg/m2). The role of BMI in patient outcomes was assessed using regression models. In total, 103,280 patients were identified with isolated severe blunt TBI. Data were excluded for patients aged < 20 or > 89 years or with BMI < 10 or > 55 kg/m2 and for patients who were transferred from another treatment center or who showed no signs of life upon presentation, leaving data from 38,446 patients for analysis. Obesity was not found to confer a survival advantage on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, underweight patients as well as obesity class 1 and 3 patients had a higher rate of mortality (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.48-2.34; OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.37; and OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.93, respectively). Increased obesity class was associated with an increased risk of respiratory complications (obesity class 1: OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.37; obesity class 2: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.62; obesity class 3: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.18-2.05) and thromboembolic complications (overweight: OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.76; obesity class 1: OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.88; obesity class 2: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.05-2.29) despite a decreased risk of overall complications (obesity class 2: OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92; obesity class 3: OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97). Underweight patients had a significantly increased risk of overall complications (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.24-1.57). Although there was an obesity-associated decrease in overall complications, the study data did not demonstrate a paradoxical protective effect of obesity on mortality after isolated severe blunt TBI. Obese patients with isolated severe blunt TBI are at increased risk of respiratory and venous thromboembolic complications. However, underweight patients appear to be at highest risk after severe blunt TBI, with significantly increased risks of morbidity and mortality.

Is it time for firearm injury to be a separate activation criteria in children? An assessment of penetrating pediatric trauma using need for surgeon presence

BackgroundPenetrating injury independently predicts the need for surgeon presence (NSP) upon arrival. Penetrating injury is often used as a trauma triage indicator, however, it includes a wide range of specific mechanisms of injury. We sought to compare firearm-related and non-firearm related pediatric penetrating injuries with respect to NSP, ISS and mortality. MethodsPatients <18 from the 2016 National Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database were included. Penetrating injury was identified and grouped using ICD-10 mechanism codes into firearm and non-firearm related injury. NSP, ISS, and mortality were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 1715 (4.2%) patients with penetrating injury were; 832 firearm-related and 883 non-firearm. No deaths occurred among the non-firearm group compared to 94 (11.3%) among firearm-related patients. Among non-firearm patients, 22.7% had a NSP indicator compared to 51.2% of patients injured by a firearm. ConclusionThere is a significantly higher proportion of severe injury and mortality with firearm penetrating injury when compared to non-firearm pediatric penetrating injury. Consideration should be given to dividing it into firearm and non-firearm penetrating injury.

Non-Accidental Trauma Associated with Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

In highly developed countries, as many as 16 percent of children are physically abused each year. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the most common injury in non-accidental trauma (NAT) and is responsible for 80 percent of fatal NAT cases, with most deaths occurring in children younger than three years old. Cases of abusers who refuse withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT) to avoid criminal charges have previously been reported. Therefore, we hypothesized that NAT is associated with a lower risk for withdrawal LSMT in pediatric TBI. The pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed (2014 to 2016) for patients aged 16 and younger with TBI and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 8 and lower on admission. Patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of 2 or less or who died within 48 hours were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for analysis. Of 2,209 TBI patients, 92 (4.2 percent) had withdrawal of LSMT. Compared to those without withdrawal of LMST, those with LMST had statistically similar median age (three years of age versus seven years) and a higher rate of NAT (33.7 percent versus 13.5 percent). The most common specified perpetrator was a father/stepfather/male partner (70 percent). After adjusting for covariates, factors associated with higher risk for withdrawal of LSMT included age of less than three years (OR 2.38, CI 1.34-4.23) and NAT (OR 1.86, CI 1.02-3.41). NAT is associated with increased risk for withdrawal of LSMT in pediatric TBI. Age of less than three years is similarly associated with a higher risk for withdrawal of LSMT. Future research in this population is needed to determine what other factors predict withdrawal of LSMT and what resources, such as social workers and/or ethics consults, are utilized.

Adjunctive use of hepatic angioembolization following hemorrhage control laparotomy.

Severe liver injuries pose a challenge to trauma surgeons. While the use of hepatic angioembolization (HAE) has been evaluated as a component of the nonoperative management of liver injury, little is known about the efficacy of postoperative HAE in patients who require hemorrhage control laparotomy (HCL) for liver injury. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of HAE following HCL on patient survival. This is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from January 2013 to December 2014. In propensity score matched (2:1) patients who underwent HCL-only or HCL + HAE, the impact of adjunctive use of HAE on patient survival was examined with the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusting for transfusion requirement within 4 hours. We also performed a subgroup analysis in patients without severe traumatic brain injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale head ≤3). A total of 1,675 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 75 (4.5%) patients underwent HAE after HCL (median hours to HAE, 5 hours after admission). In 225 propensity score-matched patients, the use of HAE following HCL was significantly associated with improved 24-hour mortality, but not in-hospital mortality. In the subgroup of patients without severe traumatic brain injury (n = 189), we observed significant survival benefits (24-hour and in-hospital mortality) associated with the adjunctive use of HAE. The results of our study suggest that the adjunctive use of HAE might improve survival of patients who require HCL for liver injury. Further prospective study to determine the indication for postoperative HAE is still warranted. Therapeutic study, level III.

Elderly Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures After Ground Level Falls Are at Risk for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury

BackgroundOsteopenia is common in the elderly, increasing their risk of sustaining cervical fractures after ground level falls (GLFs). We sought to examine the incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) and subsequent stroke in elderly GLF patients as compared with other higher injury mechanisms. Materials and methodsThe Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2011-2016) was used to identify blunt trauma patients with isolated (other body region abbreviated injury scale <3) cervical spine (C1-C7) fractures. Patients were stratified into three groups: nonelderly patients (<65) with all mechanisms of injury, elderly patients (≥65) with GLF, and elderly patients with all other mechanism of injury. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors for BCVI, stroke, spinal cord injury, and acute kidney injury. ResultsSeventeen thousand six hundred twenty-eight patients with cervical spine injuries were identified. BCVI was highest in the <65 group (0.8%) and lowest in elderly patients with GLF (0.3%, P = 0.001). When controlling for other factors, elderly patients with GLF were less likely to sustain BCVI (adjusted odds ratio: 0.46, P = 0.03) but had comparable rates of stroke attributable to BCVI (18.2% versus 6.5%, P = 0.184) and comparable rate of acute kidney injury compared with elderly patients with other mechanism of injury. ConclusionsIn elderly patients with isolated cervical spine fracture after GLF, BCVI occurs less frequently but is associated with a comparable rate of stroke as compared with other mechanisms. Low injury mechanism should not preclude BCVI screening in the presence of cervical spine fractures.

Death by Decade: Establishing a Transfusion Ceiling for Futility in Massive Transfusion

BackgroundAge and massive transfusion are predictors of mortality after trauma. We hypothesized that increasing age and high-volume transfusion would result in progressively elevated mortality rates and that a transfusion “ceiling” would define futility. MethodsThe Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried for 2013-2016 records and our level I trauma registry was reviewed from 2013 to 2018. Demographic, mortality, and blood transfusion data were collected. Patients were grouped by decade of life and by packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion requirement (zero units, 1-3 units, or ≥4 units) within 4 h of admission. ResultsTQIP analysis demonstrated an in-hospital mortality risk that increased linearly with age, to an odds ratio of 10.1 in ≥80 y old (P < 0.01). Mortality rates were significantly higher in older adults (P < 0.01) and those with more pRBCs transfused. In massively transfused patients, the transfusion “ceiling” was dependent on age. Owing to the lack granularity in the TQIP database, 230 patients from our institution who received ≥4 units of pRBCs within 4 h of admission were reviewed. On arrival, younger patients had significantly higher heart rates and more severe derangements in lactate levels, base deficits, and pH compared with older patients. There were no differences among age groups in injury severity score, systolic blood pressure, or mortality. ConclusionsIn massively transfused patients, mortality increased with age. However, a significant proportion of older adults were successfully resuscitated. Therefore, age alone should not be considered a contraindication to high-volume transfusion. Traditional physiologic and laboratory criteria indicative of hemorrhagic shock may have reduced reliability with increasing age, and thus providers must have a heightened suspicion for hemorrhage in the elderly. Early transfusion requirements can be combined with age to establish prognosis to define futility to help counsel families regarding mortality after traumatic injury.

Chemoprophylaxis and Venous Thromboembolism in Traumatic Brain Injury at Different Trauma Centers

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Because of concerns of worsening intracranial hemorrhage, clinicians are hesitant to start VTE chemoprophylaxis in this population. We hypothesized that ACS Level I trauma centers would be more aggressive with VTE chemoprophylaxis in adults with severe TBI than Level II centers. We also predicted that Level I centers would have a lower risk of VTE. We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) database for patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale scores of 4 and 5 of the head and compared them based on treating the hospital trauma level. Of 204,895 patients with severe TBI, 143,818 (70.2%) were treated at Level I centers and 61,077 (29.8%) at Level II centers. The Level I cohort had a higher rate of VTE chemoprophylaxis use (43.2% vs 23.3%, P < 0.001) and a shorter median time to chemoprophylaxis (61.9 vs 85.9 hours, P < 0.001). Although Level I trauma centers started VTE chemoprophylaxis more often and earlier than Level II centers, there was no difference in the risk of VTE (P = 0.414) after controlling for covariates. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the timing, safety, and efficacy of early VTE chemoprophylaxis in severe TBI patients.

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections among Trauma Patients: Poor Quality of Care or Marker of Effective Rescue?

Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is associated generally with worse outcomes among hospitalized patients, but the impact of CAUTI on clinical outcomes is poorly described in trauma patients. We hypothesized that trauma patients with CAUTI would have worse outcomes such as longer length of stay (LOS), fewer discharges to home, and higher outcome of death. Methods: Patients with LOS >2 d in the 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database were included. Patients with and without CAUTI were matched 1:1 via a propensity score using patient, injury, and hospital factors as covariates. Matched pair analysis was performed to compare difference in clinical outcomes between patients with and without CAUTI. Results: There were 238,274 patients identified, of whom 0.7% had a diagnosis of CAUTI. Prior to matching, CAUTI patients had a higher mortality rate (6.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01), but groups differed significantly. There were 1,492 matched pairs created, with effective reduction in bias; post-match propensity score covariates all had absolute standardized differences <0.1. In matched pair analysis, CAUTI patients had lower outcome of death compared with patients without CAUTI (6.7% vs. 10.1%, p < 0.01). The CAUTI was associated with longer length of stay, more intensive care unit and ventilator days, more unplanned events, and fewer discharges to home (all p < 0.01). Conclusions: Trauma patients with CAUTI had lower outcome of death compared with patients without CAUTI, despite worse clinical outcomes in all other aspects. This difference may be associated with "rescue" care in the form of unplanned events, and CAUTI may be an unintended consequence of this "rescue" care, rather than a marker of poor quality of care.

Rib fixation in geriatric trauma: Mortality benefits for the most vulnerable patients.

Rib fractures in the geriatric trauma population are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The outcomes of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) have not been well defined in this population. Data from the 2016 to 2017 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database were analyzed. Patients older than 65 years admitted with isolated chest wall injury and multiple rib fractures were abstracted from the database. Multivariate propensity score matching was utilized to stratify patients that underwent rib fixation versus nonoperative management. In the matched cohort, we assessed outcomes including mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay (LOS), tracheostomy rates, and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates. We performed a secondary analysis of patients receiving early (<72 hours) versus late SSRF. Of the 44,450 patients included in the study analysis, 758 (1.7%) underwent SSRF. Patients undergoing SSRF were younger, had a higher prevalence of flail chest, higher rates of emergency room intubation, higher Injury Severity Score, and increased ICU admission rates. The 1:1 propensity score match resulted in 758 patients in each group. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in patients that underwent SSRF (4.2% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.01). However, the fixation group also had higher rates of tracheostomy during admission (11.2% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001) and VAP (3.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.007). In a secondary matched analysis of 326 pairs of patients undergoing SSRF, we found that early fixation was associated with decreased rates of VAP (1.5% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.01), fewer ventilator days (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.003), shorter ICU LOS (6 days vs. 9 days, p = 0.001), and shorter hospital LOS (10 days vs. 15 days, p < 0.001). This study demonstrates a mortality benefit in geriatric trauma patients undergoing SSRF. Early SSRF was observed to be associated with decreased rates of VAP, decreased ICU LOS, and decreased hospital LOS. Early SSRF may be associated with improved outcomes in the geriatric trauma population with multiple rib fractures. Therapeutic/Care management, level III.

Mangled Lower Extremity Is Associated With Pulmonary Embolism But Not Deep Venous Thrombosis: Results From the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database

BackgroundThe mangled extremity (ME) is a limb with a multisystem injury (soft tissue, bone, nerves, or vessels). We hypothesized that trauma patients who present with mangled lower extremities (ME) experience a higher rate of venous thromboembolism when matched against trauma patients of similar injury burden without ME. Materials and methodsData were abstracted from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2013 to 2016. Baseline comparisons were made between patients with and without ME. Propensity score matching with logistic regression modeling on the matched sample was performed controlling for patient gender, race, insurance status, age, injury severity score, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of significant other non-ME trauma, use of and time to prophylactic anticoagulation, placement of an inferior vena cava filter, and if immediate operative intervention was performed. ResultsA total of 1060 patients presented with an ME. Compared with other trauma patients, those with ME tended to be younger and male. They were more likely to receive prophylactic anticoagulation and an inferior vena cava filter. After propensity score matching, ME was statistically significantly associated with pulmonary embolism (PE) but not deep venous thrombosis (average treatment effect on the treated 1.7%, P = 0.04; and 1.4%, P = 0.22, respectively). These results were confirmed in a logistic regression on the matched sample (odds ratios 1.6, P = 0.11 for deep venous thrombosis, and odds ratio 3.2, P = 0.006 for PE). ConclusionsPatients with mangled lower extremities experience higher rates of PE. Based on these findings, institutions may consider evaluating their own VTE rates and chemoprophylaxis protocols in those with MEs.

Sternotomy for Hemorrhage Control in Trauma

BackgroundLittle is known about the injuries, mechanisms, and outcomes in trauma patients undergoing sternotomy for hemorrhage control (SHC). The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of mortality for SHC and provide a descriptive analysis of the use of SHC in trauma. We hypothesize blunt trauma is associated with higher mortality compared with penetrating trauma among trauma patients requiring SHC. MethodsThe Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2013-2016) database was queried for adult patients undergoing SHC within 24 h of admission. Patients with blunt and penetrating trauma were compared using chi-square and Mann–Whitney U-test. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine the risk of mortality. ResultsOf 584 patients undergoing SHC, 322 (55.1%) were involved in penetrating trauma, and 69 (11.8%) were involved in blunt. The blunt trauma group had a higher median injury severity score (31.5 versus 25.0; P < 0.001) compared with the penetrating group. The median time to hemorrhage control was longer in those with blunt compared with penetrating trauma (84.6 versus 49.8 min; P < 0.001). The mortality rate was higher in patients with blunt compared with penetrating trauma (29.0% versus 12.7%; P < 0.001). However, after adjusting for covariates, there was no difference in risk of mortality between blunt and penetrating trauma (P = 0.06). ConclusionsTrauma patients requiring SHC after blunt trauma had a higher mortality rate than those in penetrating trauma. After adjusting for predictors of mortality, there was no difference in risk of mortality despite nearly double the time to hemorrhage control in patients presenting after blunt trauma.

So you need a surgeon? Need for surgeon presence as an alternative metric to predict outcomes and assess triage in the pediatric trauma population

BackgroundInjury Severity Score (ISS) is the primary metric by which triage has been evaluated in trauma activations. We compared ISS to a previously described set of criteria defined as Need for Surgical Presence (NSP). We hypothesize that NSP may serve as a way to augment ISS in predicting mortality and assessing triage in pediatric trauma patients. MethodsA total of 19,139 pediatric trauma patients in the 2016 National Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database (excluding transfers) had complete data for mortality, mode of transport, age, injury type, ISS, and NSP factors. NSP was defined as having one or more of the following: intubation, transfusion, operation for hemorrhage control/craniotomy, vasopressors, interventional radiology, spinal cord Injury, tube thoracostomy, emergency thoracotomy, intracranial pressure monitor, or pericardiocentesis. ResultsOverall mortality was 1.3% and 96% of all patients suffered blunt injury. A total of 2787 (14.6%) patients had an NSP indicator compared to 2036 (10.8%) with an ISS ≥16. NSP was noninferior to ISS in predicting mortality with the AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.89–0.92) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.88–0.92) respectively. ConclusionNSP predicts mortality in pediatric trauma patients as well as ISS, and may compliment ISS. NSP status can be assigned shortly after patient arrival. Proper assessment of over and undertriage allows for optimal resource utilization by the medical facility and ultimately benefits the hospital, physician and patient. Study typeRetrospective national dataset study. Level of evidenceLevel II.