Trauma Computed Tomography Scans Research Articles

Deep Learning-Based Denoising Enables High-Quality, Fully Diagnostic Neuroradiological Trauma CT at 25% Radiation Dose

Traumatic neuroradiological emergencies necessitate rapid and accurate diagnosis, often relying on computed tomography (CT). However, the associated ionizing radiation poses long-term risks. Modern artificial intelligence reconstruction algorithms have shown promise in reducing radiation dose while maintaining image quality. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the dose reduction capabilities of a deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm in traumatic neuroradiological emergency CT scans. This retrospective single-center study included 100 patients with neuroradiological trauma CT scans. Full-dose (100%) and low-dose (25%) simulated scans were processed using iterative reconstruction (IR2) and DLD. Subjective and objective image quality assessments were performed by four neuroradiologists alongside clinical endpoint analysis. Bayesian sensitivity and specificity were computed with 95% credible intervals. Subjective analysis showed superior scores for 100% DLD compared to 100% IR2 and 25% IR2 (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed between 25% DLD and 100% IR2. Objective analysis revealed no significant CT value differences but higher noise at 25% dose for DLD and IR2 compared to 100% (p<0.001). DLD exhibited lower noise than IR2 at both dose levels (p<0.001). Clinical endpoint analysis indicated equivalence to 100% IR2 in fracture detection for all datasets, with sensitivity losses in hemorrhage detection at 25% IR2. DLD (25% and 100%) maintained comparable sensitivity to 100% IR2. All comparisons demonstrated robust specificity. The evaluated algorithm enables high-quality, fully diagnostic CT scans at 25% of the initial radiation dose and improves patient care by reducing unnecessary radiation exposure.

Ethnic differences in CT derived abdominal body composition measures: a comparative retrospect pilot study between European and Inuit study population

ABSTRACT Understanding ethnic variations in body composition is crucial for assessing health risks. Universal models may not suit all ethnicities, and there is limited data on the Inuit population. This study aimed to compare body composition between Inuit and European adults using computed tomography (CT) scans and to investigate the influence of demographics on these measurements. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 50 adults (29 Inuit and 21 European) who underwent standard trauma CT scans. Measurements focused on skeletal muscle index (SMI), various fat indices, and densities at the third lumbar vertebra level, analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and multiple linear regression. Inuit women showed larger fat tissue indices and lower muscle and fat densities than European women. Differences in men were less pronouncehd, with only Intramuscular fat density being lower among Inuit men. Regression indicated that SMI was higher among men, and skeletal muscle density decreased with Inuit ethnicity and age, while visceral fat index was positively associated with age. This study suggests ethnic differences in body composition measures particularly among women, and indicates the need for Inuit-specific body composition models. It higlights the importance of further research into Inuit-specific body composition measurements for better health risk assessment.

Computed Tomography Overuse in Pediatric Minor Head Trauma: Insights from a Single-Center Experience.

Minor head trauma is a common reason for emergency department visits in children, but many of these cases are not clinically significant. Despite established criteria for selecting patients who require computed tomography (CT), concerns about overuse of CT persist. This study aimed to determine the frequency of clinically important traumatic brain injury by retrospectively evaluating cranial CT scans in children categorized as very low risk for such injuries based on PECARN prediction rules. Cranial CT scans of 941 minor head trauma cases were assessed for the presence, type, and number of calvarial bone fractures. Concomitant bleeding and treatment approaches were also recorded. Among 881 patients (93.6%), cranial CT scans did not reveal any lesions apart from soft tissue edema. None of the cases had clinically important traumatic brain injury or required neurosurgical intervention. The study demonstrated that 93.6% of cranial CT scans for pediatric minor head trauma were negative, indicating a concerningly high rate of CT overuse. Although prediction rules exist, their application in clinical practice is not always optimal. Given the principle of "first, do no harm," proper patient selection is crucial to avoid unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation.

Use of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence head injury guidelines among patients with delayed presentation after head trauma can lead to missed traumatic brain injury: a 5-year institutional review.

In 2014, traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused 3 million ER visits, hospitalizations, and deaths in the US. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, initially generated using data from patients presenting within 24h of head trauma, are used to determine the need for head computed tomography (CT) scan in patients after 24h. The authors wanted to determine the proportion of CT scans for head trauma performed at our center in late presenters (>24h after head trauma), the incidence of intracranial pathology in early (24h) versus late (>24h) presenters, and the sensitivity of the NICE guidelines for TBI in these two subpopulations. A retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary care center in Karachi. All people (>16) who had a head CT for head trauma from 2010 to 2015 were included. Age, sex, primary diagnosis, comorbid disorders, mechanism-of-injury, duration (in hours) from head trauma to presentation, site, and extent of injury (injury severity scale), hospital stay, number and details of surgical procedures, CT scan findings, other injuries, and mortality were recorded. Means were compared using the Independent Sample t-test, while categorical variables were compared using χ2. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify TBI predictors. The authors found 2009 eligible patients; seven were excluded due to incomplete medical records. The final statistical analysis comprised 2002 head trauma patients. Overall, 52% of early and late presenters had severe injuries, and 2.3% died. 32.2% of patients with head trauma had CT after 24h. Early presenters were 46.7% traumatized, while late presenters were 63%. The NICE guidelines were 93% sensitive for early presenters and 83% for late presenters with traumatic intracranial injury. Patients coming to the emergency department after 24h of head trauma are a large proportion of the overall head trauma population. The NICE guidelines for late-presenting head injuries are less sensitive and may overlook intracranial injuries if imaging is not performed.

Factors Contributing to Computed Tomography Trauma Scan Times at a Tertiary Center: Improving Emergency Department Trauma Imaging Workflow Through Targeted Interventions.

The aims of the study are to identify factors contributing to computed tomography (CT) trauma scan turnaround time variation and to evaluate the effects of an automated intervention on time metrics. Throughput metrics were captured via picture archiving and communication system from January 1, 2018, to December 16, 2019, and included 17,709 CT trauma scans from our institution. Initial data showed that imaging technologist variation played a significant role in trauma imaging turnaround time. In December 2019, we implemented a 2-pronged intervention: (1) educational intervention to techs and (2) modified trauma CT abdomen/pelvis to autogenerate and autosend reformats to picture archiving and communication system. A total of 13,169 trauma CT scans were evaluated from the postintervention period taking place from January 2020 to March 2021. Throughput metrics such as last image to first report interval and emergency department length of stay were captured and compared with performing technologist, time of day, and weekday versus weekend scans. Substantial variability among trauma CT scans was observed. For CT trauma abdomen/pelvis, the interval from last image to initial report decreased from 26.4 to 24.0 minutes ( P = 0.001) while the interval between first and last image time decreased from 11.4 to 4.2 minutes ( P < 0.001). Emergency department length of stay also decreased from 3.9 to 3.7 hours ( P < 0.0001) in the postintervention period. Variation among imaging technologist was statistically significant and became less significant after intervention ( P = 0.09, P = 0.54). Factors such as imaging technologist variability, time of day, and day of the week of trauma scans played a significant role in CT trauma turnaround time variability. Automation interventions can help with efficiency in image turnaround time.

Perioperative Management of Incidental Pulmonary Embolisms on Trauma CT Scans: A Narrative Review.

Unsuspected pulmonary embolism (PE) may be identified on an initial traumacomputed tomography (CT) scan. The clinical importance of these incidental PEs remains to be elucidated.In patients who require surgery, careful management is needed.We sought to investigate the optimal perioperative management of such patients, including the use of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis, possible thrombolytic therapy, and inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. A literature search was conducted, and all relevant articles were identified, investigated, and included. Medical guidelines were also consulted where appropriate.Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is the mainstay of preoperative treatment, and low-molecular-weight heparins, fondaparinux, and unfractionated heparin may all be used. It has been suggested that prophylaxis should be administered as soon as possible after trauma. Such agents may be contraindicated in patients with significant bleeding, and mechanical prophylaxis and inferior vena cava filters may be favoured in these patients. Therapeutic anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapies may be consideredbut are associated with an increased risk of haemorrhage. Delaying surgery might help to minimise the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism, and any interruption of prophylaxis must be strategically planned. Recommendations for postoperative care include a continuation of prophylaxis and therapeutic anticoagulation, with follow-up clinical evaluation within six months. Incidental PE is a common finding on trauma CT scans. Although the clinical significance is unknown, careful management of the balance between anticoagulation and bleeding is needed, especially in trauma patients and even more so in trauma patients requiring surgery.

Initial assessment of hemorrhagic shock by trauma computed tomography measurement of the inferior vena cava in blunt trauma patients.

Inferior vena cava (IVC) collapse is related to hypovolemia. Sonography has been used to measure the IVC diameter, but there is variation depending on the skill of the operator and it is difficult to obtain accurate measurements in patients who have a large amount of intestinal gas or are obese. As a modality to obtain accurate measurements, we measured the diameters of the IVC and aorta on trauma computed tomography scans and investigated the correlation between the IVC to aorta ratio and the shock index in blunt trauma patients. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 588 trauma patients who were transferred to the regional trauma center (level 1) of Wonkang University Hospital from March 2020 to February 2021. We included trauma patients 18 years or older who met the trauma activation criteria and underwent trauma computed tomography scans with intravenous contrast within 40 minutes of admission. The shock index was calculated from vital signs before trauma computed tomography scan, and measurements of the anteroposterior diameter of the IVC (AP), the transverse diameter of the IVC (T), and aorta were made 10 mm above the right renal vein in the venous phase. Overall, 271 patients were included in this study, of whom 150 had a shock index ≤0.7 and 121 had a shock index >0.7. The T to AP ratio and AP to aorta ratio were significantly different between groups. Cutoffs were identified for the T to AP ratio and AP to aorta ratio (2.37 and 0.62, respectively) that produced clinically useful sensitivity and specificity for predicting a shock index >0.7, demonstrating moderate accuracy (T to AP ratio: area under the curve, 0.71; sensitivity, 59%; specificity, 87% and AP to aorta ratio: area under the curve, 0.70; sensitivity, 55%; specificity, 91%). The T to AP ratio and AP to aorta ratio are useful for predicting hemorrhagic shock in trauma patients.

Paediatric trauma imaging in a regional Queensland hospital: Do we need clearer guidance?

Paediatric trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in those aged 0-14. Anatomical and physiological differences require a specialised approach to paediatric trauma care. Medical imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT) scans, requires specific consideration because of the consequences of radiation exposure in the paediatric population. The present study compares current practice of CT scan ordering in paediatric trauma patients at a regional Australian hospital against consensus guidelines published in the UK. A retrospective audit of paediatric trauma CT scans referred from the ED from May 2017 to May 2018 was completed. Details relating to CT scan ordering were reviewed and compliance with the Royal College of Radiologists Paediatric trauma protocols, was determined. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests comparing those that met and did not meet guidelines were performed. A total of 71 CT scans were included with an overall compliance rate of 56.3%. Specific regional compliance was lowest with CT neck at 14%. Patients where a trauma call was initiated were more likely to receive a full body (pan) scan rather than region specific imaging. Compliance improved when paediatric team involvement was documented. Evidence-based guidelines for CT imaging in paediatric trauma are essential to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure for children. The present study has demonstrated that current practice has the potential to be improved and that decisions should involve a multidisciplinary team.

Determining the Need for Computed Tomography Scan Following Blunt Chest Trauma through Machine Learning Approaches

Introduction:The use of computed tomography (CT) scan is essential for making diagnoses for trauma patients in emergency medicine. Numerous studies have been conducted on guiding medical examinations in light of advances in machine learning, leading to more accurate and rapid diagnoses. The present study aims to propose a machine learning-based method to help emergency physicians prevent performance of unnecessary CT scans for chest trauma patients.Methods:A dataset of 1000 samples collected in nearly two years was used. Classification methods used for modeling included the support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, decision tree, multilayer perceptron (four hidden layers), random forest, and K nearest neighbor (KNN). The present work employs the decision tree approach (the most interpretable machine learning approach) as the final method. Results:The accuracy of 7 machine learning algorithms was investigated. The decision tree algorithm was of higher accuracy than other algorithms. The optimal tree depth of 7 was chosen using the training data. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the final model was calculated to be 99.91% (95%CI: 99.10% – 100%), 100% (95%CI: 99.89% – 100%), and 99.33% (95%CI: 99.10% – 99.56%), respectively.Conclusion:Considering its high sensitivity, the proposed model seems to be sufficiently reliable for determining the need for performing a CT scan.

Should We Report Incidental Low-Density Liver Lesions with Benign Features? A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of Trauma CT Scans

Abstract Background Many incidental liver lesions are benign and require no additional workup. Investigation of such lesions can have a negative impact of both the patient and health care system. However, the impact of how radiologists report these incidental lesions is not clear. We aimed to investigate how reporting of incidental liver lesions on trauma computed tomography (CT) scan affects follow-up. Methods This is a retrospective single-center analysis of body CT scans performed following abdominal trauma. Information was collected on the reporting of incidental low-density liver lesions and any additional imaging performed. Results A total of 3,595 trauma body CT scan reports were reviewed. Incidental liver lesions were identified in 527 (15%) patients, with 347 (10%) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Additional imaging was requested by the referring doctor for 43 out of 285 patients (15%) when lesions were mentioned in the body of the report only, compared with 41 out of 62 patients (66%) when mentioned in the conclusion (odds ratio [OR] = 10.99, p &lt; 0.0001). When additional imaging was recommended in the report, follow-up was arranged for 36 out of 52 patients (69%), compared with 48 out of 285 patients (16%) when it was not suggested (OR = 11.58, p &lt; 0.0001). Additional imaging was requested for 84 of the 347 patients (24%), with 24 of these performed at our institution. All patients followed-up at our institution were diagnosed with a benign lesion. Conclusion Reporting incidental hypodense liver lesions in the conclusion or specifically recommending further additional imaging, both led to significantly increased likelihood of additional imaging being performed. Radiologists who encounter such lesions should consider excluding them from the conclusion if there are no malignant features or patient risk factors.

Frequency, Recognition, and Potential Risk Factors of Incidental Findings on Trauma Computed Tomography Scans: A Cross-Sectional Study at an Urban Level One Trauma Center.

Computed tomography (CT) use in injured patients has continuously increased in the past decades. We designed and undertook this study to evaluate the frequency, and potential risks of incidental findings (IFs), and how they were processed in trauma patients receiving CT scans. We retrospectively reviewed CT scans, official CT reports, and basic demographics in trauma patients who received CT scans at our emergency department in 2016. Scans with IFs prompted a detailed review of medical records to determine clinical significance and how they were processed. IFs were classified into three categories: category I (potentially severe condition, in-time management required), category II (not urgent, follow-up needed), and category III (of minor concern). Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to determine patient characteristics associated with IFs. In the 4,092 scans enrolled, IFs were identified in 649 (15.9%). There were 13 (2.0%) category I, 306 (47.2%) category II, and 330 (50.8%) category III IFs. Patients with IFs were older than those without. No sex-based difference was found. Most (61.5%) of the scans were performed for the head; however, the abdomen had the highest IF prevalence (26.2%). Documentation about IFs was poor; 31% of category I, 91.9% of category II, and 97.0% of category III have no related record. Old age remains the risk predicting the presence of IFs, and every year of increasing age was independently associated with a higher prevalence of IFs (OR: 1.019; 95% CI: 1.015-1.024). IFs are common in trauma CT scans; however, recognition and management remain poor. Abdomen and chest scans, and CT in older patients should remind us of increasing risks of IFs.

Interpretation of emergency CT scans in polytrauma: trauma surgeon vs radiologist.

IntroductionTime is critical in the trauma setting. Emergency computed tomography (CT) scans are usually interpreted by the attending doctor and plans to manage the patient are implemented before the formal radiological report is available. This study aims to investigate the discrepancy in interpretation of emergency whole body CT scans in trauma patients by the trauma surgeon and radiologist and to determine if the difference in trauma surgeon and radiologist interpretation of emergency trauma CT scans has an impact on patient management.MethodThis prospective observational comparative study was conducted over a 6 month period (01 April–30 September 2016) at the Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital which has a level 1 trauma department. The study population comprised 62 polytrauma patients who underwent a multiphase whole body CT scans as per the trauma imaging protocol. The trauma surgeons' initial interpretation of the CT scan and radiological report were compared. All CT scans reported by the radiology registrar were reviewed by a consultant radiologist. The time from completion of the CT scan and completion of the radiological report was analysed.ResultsSince the trauma surgeon accompanied the patient to radiology and reviewed the images as soon as the scan was complete, the initial interpretation of the CT was performed within 15–30 min. The median time between the CT scan completion and reporting turnaround time was 75 (16–218) min. Critical findings were missed by the trauma surgeon in 4.8% of patients (bronchial transection, abdominal aortic intimal tear and cervical spine fracture) and non-critical/incidental findings in 41.94%. The trauma surgeon correctly detected and graded visceral injury in all cases.ConclusionThere was no significant discrepancy in the critical findings on interpretation of whole body CT scans in polytrauma patients by the trauma surgeon and radiologist and therefore no negative impact on patient management from missed injury or misdiagnosis.The turnaround time for the radiology report does not allow for timeous management of the trauma patient.

Occult bowel injury after blunt abdominal trauma

BackgroundFollowing blunt abdominal trauma, bowel injuries are often missed on admission computed tomography (CT) scan. MethodsMulticenter retrospective analysis of 176 adults with moderate-critical blunt abdominal trauma and admission CT scan who underwent operative exploration. Patients with a bowel injury missed on CT (n = 36, 20%) were compared to all other patients (n = 140, 80%). ResultsThe missed injury group had greater incidence free fluid without solid organ injury on CT scan (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.038) and visceral adhesions (28% vs. 6%, p = 0.001). Independent predictors of missed bowel injury included prior abdominal inflammation (OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.37–10.18), CT evidence of free fluid in the absence of solid organ injury (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.03–5.19) and intraoperative identification of visceral adhesions (OR 4.46, 95% CI 1.52–13.13). ConclusionsPatients with visceral adhesive disease and indirect evidence of bowel injury on CT scan were more likely to have occult bowel injury.

Predictive factors of intracranial bleeding in head trauma patients receiving antiplatelet therapy admitted to an emergency department

BackgroundIn head trauma cases involving antiplatelet agent treatment, the French Society of Emergency Medicine recommends performing computed tomography (CT) scans to detect brain lesions, 90% of which are normal. The value of CT is still debatable given the scarce number of studies and controversial results.MethodsWe used the RATED registry (Registry of patient with Antithrombotic agents admitted to an Emergency Department, NCT02706080) to assess factors of cerebral bleeding related to antiplatelet agents following head trauma.ResultsFrom January 2014 to December 2015, 993 patients receiving antiplatelet agents were recruited, 293 (29.5%) of whom underwent CT scans for brain trauma. Intracranial bleeding was found in 26 (8.9%). Multivariate analysis revealed these patients more likely to have a history of severe hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR]: 8.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56–45.82), dual antiplatelet therapy (OR: 6.46, 95%CI:1.46–28.44), headache or vomiting (OR: 4.27, 95%CI: 1.44–2.60), and abnormal Glasgow coma scale (OR: 8.60; 95%CI: 2.85–25.99) compared to those without intracranial bleeding. The predictive model derived from these variables achieved 98.9% specificity and a negative predictive value of 92%. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.77–0.93).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that the absence of history of severe hemorrhage, dual antiplatelet therapy, headache or vomiting, and abnormal Glasgow coma scale score appears to predict normal CT scan following traumatic brain injury in patients taking antiplatelets. This finding requires confirmation by prospective studies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02706080.

Hepatic Heterogeneity and Attenuation on Contrast-Enhanced CT in Patients With the Hypovolemic Shock Complex: Objective Classification Using a Contemporary Cohort

When objectively measured on computed tomography (CT), does hepatic heterogeneity or overall liver attenuation predict the presence of shock? This retrospective study included 73 patients (mean age 33 years) with the hypoperfusion shock complex (HSC) on CT (cases) and 100 patients (mean age 43 years) with negative trauma CT scans (controls). Liver heterogeneity was calculated by using consistently sized regions of interest (ROIs) to measure the 2 highest and the 2 lowest areas of hepatic density (in Hounsfield units [HU]). The difference between the means of the 2 highest and 2 lowest ROIs was considered the heterogeneity. Attenuation was calculated using the mean of 3 randomly placed ROIs. Both heterogeneity and attenuation were then compared between cases and controls. Median hepatic heterogeneity was 16.8 HU (IQR: 10.7-23.4) for the HSC group and 9.0 HU (IQR: 7.0-10.4) for the controls (P < 0.001). The area under the curve was 0.79, and a threshold of 30 HU yielded a specificity of 100%. Median hepatic attenuation was not significantly different between the HSC and the control groups, with an area under the curve of 0.56. Increased hepatic heterogeneity may represent an objective marker of the HSC that performs in a similar manner to other established signs. By comparison, overall hepatic hypoattenuation is a poor indicator of the HSC.

The height of the cricothyroid membrane on computed tomography scans in trauma patients.

Emergency cricothyrotomy is a common feature in all difficult airway algorithms. It is the final step following a 'can't intubate, can't oxygenate' scenario. It is rarely performed and has a significant failure rate. There is variation in the reported size of the cricothyroid membrane, especially across population groups. Procedural failure may result from attempting to pass a device with too large an external diameter through the cricothyroid membrane. We aimed to determine the maximum height of the cricothyroid membrane in a UK trauma population. Electronic callipers were used to measure the maximum height of the cricothyroid membrane on 482 reformatted trauma computed tomography scans, 377 (78.2%) of which were in male patients. The mean (SD) height of the cricothyroid membrane, as independently measured by two radiologists, was 7.89 (2.21)mm and 7.88 (2.22)mm in male patients, and 6.00 (1.76)mm and 5.92 (1.71)mm in female patients. The presence of concurrent tracheal intubation or cervical spine immobilisation was found not to have a significant effect on cricothyroid membrane height. The cricothyroid membrane height in the study population was much smaller than that previously reported. Practitioners encountering patients who may require an emergency surgical airway should be aware of these data. Rescue airway equipment with variety of external diameters should be immediately available.

Emergency radiology and mass casualty incidents-report of a mass casualty incident at a level 1 trauma center.

The aims of this article are to describe the events of a recent mass casualty incident (MCI) at our level 1 trauma center and to describe the radiology response to the event. We also describe the findings and recommendations of our radiology department after-action review. An MCI activation was triggered after an amphibious military vehicle, repurposed for tourist activities, carrying 37 passengers, collided with a charter bus carrying 45 passengers on a busy highway bridge in Seattle, WA, USA. There were 4 deaths at the scene, and 51 patients were transferred to local hospitals following prehospital scene triage. Nineteen patients were transferred to our level 1 trauma center. Eighteen casualties arrived within 72 min. Sixteen arrived within 1 h of the first patient arrival, and 1 casualty was transferred 3 h later having initially been assessed at another hospital. Eighteen casualties (94.7 %) underwent diagnostic imaging in the emergency department. Of these 18 casualties, 15 had a trauma series (portable chest x-ray and x-ray of pelvis). Whole-body trauma computed tomography scans (WBCT) were performed on 15 casualties (78.9 %), 12 were immediate and performed during the initial active phase of the MCI, and 3 WBCTs were delayed. The initial 12 WBCTs were completed in 101 min. The mean number of radiographic studies performed per patient was 3 (range 1-8), and the total number of injuries detected was 88. The surge in imaging requirements during an MCI can be significant and exceed normal operating capacity. This report of our radiology experience during a recent MCI and subsequent after-action review serves to provide an example of how radiology capacity and workflow functioned during an MCI, in order to provide emergency radiologists and response planners with practical recommendations for implementation in the event of a future MCI.

SU‐F‐SPS‐03: Direct Measurement of Organ Doses Resulting From Head and Cervical Spine Trauma CT Protocols

Purpose:This retrospective study analyzes the exposure history of emergency department (ED) patients undergoing head and cervical spine trauma computed tomography (CT) studies. This study investigated dose levels received by trauma patients and addressed any potential concerns regarding radiation dose issues.Methods:Under proper IRB approval, a cohort of 300 trauma cases of head and cervical spine trauma CT scans received in the ED was studied. The radiological image viewing software of the hospital was used to view patient images and image data. The following parameters were extracted: the imaging history of patients, the reported dose metrics from the scanner including the volumetric CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP). A postmortem subject was scanned using the same scan techniques utilized in a standard clinical head and cervical spine trauma CT protocol with 120 kVp and 280 mAs. The CTDIvol was recorded for the subject and the organ doses were measured using optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters. Typical organ doses to the brain, thyroid, lens, salivary glands, and skin, based on the cadaver studies, were then calculated and reported for the cohort.Results:The CTDIvol reported by the CT scanner was 25.5 mGy for the postmortem subject. The average CTDIvol from the patient cohort was 34.1 mGy. From these metrics, typical average organ doses in mGy were found to be: Brain (44.57), Thyroid (33.40), Lens (82.45), Salivary Glands (61.29), Skin (47.50). The imaging history of the cohort showed that on average trauma patients received 26.1 scans over a lifetime.Conclusion:The average number of scans received on average by trauma ED patients shows that radiation doses in trauma patients may be a concern. Available dose tracking software would be helpful to track doses in trauma ED patients, highlighting the importance of minimizing unnecessary scans and keeping doses ALARA.

Incidental findings on whole-body trauma computed tomography: Experience at a major trauma centre

IntroductionThe use of total-body computed tomography (CT) scanning in the evaluation of multiply injured patients is increasing, and their liberal use has stirred debate as to the added benefit relative to the risk of radiation exposure and inappropriate use of limited healthcare resources. Findings unrelated to the clinician's reasons for requesting the radiological examination are often uncovered due to the comprehensive nature of the evaluation at a trauma centre. However, some of these findings are outside the expertise of the trauma team who initially organised the scan and this may lead to uncertainty over who is best qualified to follow-up the incidental finding. We aim to evaluate the frequency of incidental findings on whole body trauma CT scans in a consecutive series of trauma admissions to our unit. Materials and methodsWe identified 104 consecutive major trauma patients who received a whole-body trauma CT (head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen and pelvis) from Jan 2013 to Dec 2013 in our unit (out of a total of 976 trauma admissions in the same year). Patient-specific information was extracted from computerised hospital databases containing admission and progress notes, radiological reports, operation notes and pathology reports. Results57 patients (54.8%) had incidental findings identified on the radiologist report, with a total of 114 individual incidental findings. 6 (5.8%) patients had potentially severe findings that required further diagnostic work up; 65 (62.5%) patients had diagnostic workup dependant on their symptoms, and 43 (41.3%) patients had incidental findings of minor concern which required no follow up. Discussion and conclusionsOur findings reflect the literature noting that incidental findings are increasingly common due to the central diagnostic role of CT imaging in trauma care, but also due to advances in imaging techniques and quality. In keeping with published literature, we note that increased age is associated with an increased incidence of “incidental findings” and this will continue to rise with the ageing population and the mandatory nature of trauma CTs.

The value of official reinterpretation of trauma computed tomography scans from referring hospitals

IntroductionHistorically, computed tomography (CT) scans of injured children obtained at referring emergency departments were not reinterpreted by trauma center radiologists at our institution, creating a dilemma for trauma physicians: rescan, use the outside interpretation, or interpret scans themselves. In 2010, our radiologists began reinterpreting all referring hospital trauma CT scans; this study examines the effect of that change. MethodsTransferred patients who had undergone an abdomen/pelvis CT (CTAP) scan between December 2010 and December 2012 were identified in our trauma registry. Pediatric radiologist reinterpretations were compared to referring hospital radiologist reports. ResultsWe identified 168 patients transferred to our institution with a CTAP. Seventy patients were excluded owing to lack of: complete study, referring hospital interpretation, or reinterpretation. Of the remaining 98 cases, 12 new injuries were identified: 3 splenic and 3 liver injuries, 1 adrenal hematoma, 2 pelvic fractures, 1 spinal fracture, 1 duodenal hematoma and 1 jejunal perforation. Three patients had solid organ injuries upgraded (grade II to III liver laceration; 2 renal lacerations with active extravasation initially missed), and 4 patients downgraded to no injury. ConclusionReinterpretation of referring hospital CT scans by pediatric radiologists is beneficial to appropriate management of pediatric trauma patients with concern for blunt abdominal trauma.