This study presented reduced-order modeling methods for evaluating the structural robustness of steel frame buildings with different composite floor slabs under ground floor column loss scenarios. The adequacy of the reduced-order modeling technique was justified by relatively high-fidelity models, which were verified by a full-scale composite floor test and detailed material coupon tests. This reduced-order modeling method was applied to the progressive collapse simulation of a five-story prototype building. The effect of floor slabs, slab rebars, and steel decks' longitudinal continuity on its progressive collapse resistance was examined. Composite slabs with four different profiled steel decks were considered in this study, which are trapezoidal deck, dovetail deck, reentrant deck, and rebar-truss deck; in addition, reinforced concrete (RC) slab was also considered for comparative purposes. To account for the possible sudden column failure scenario in practice, an energy-based approach was used to convert the quasi-static response curves to dynamic response curves. The structural robustness was evaluated by comparing each column failure case's dynamic ultimate capacities with corresponding design requirements. The structural robustness of prototype buildings under progressive collapse scenarios was summarized and discussed. The analysis results showed that the structural robustness of the prototype building with rebar-truss composite slab was higher than that with RC slab or other composite slabs. The prototype building with floor slabs using HRB400 rebars had higher structural robustness than that using CRB550 rebars.
Read full abstract