Transverse Process Hooks Research Articles

Bipolar hybrid posterior instrumentation tecnique for the correction of Scheuermann's kyphosis.

Scheuermann´s kyphosis (SK) is the most common cause of painful and progressive structural hyperkyphosis in adolescents. Surgical treatment should be considered in cases of refractory pain or progressive deformities. We present the clinical and radiological results obtained using a bipolar, hybrid posterior instrumentation tecnique. We analysed 12 males and 6 females, with mean age of 15.8years. Minimum follow-up was 2years. We used transverse process hooks at the cranial level and polyaxial screws for the remaining levels. We did not instrument the periapical segment. We used the sagittal stable vertebra (SSV) as the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in most cases, the "barely touched SSV" if the above disc space is lordotic. The mean preoperative kyphosis was 73.6º, mean postoperative kyphosis 44.7º, and mean correction of 28.9º (p = 0.0002). The mean reduction in lumbar lordosis (LL) was 8.9º (p = 0.0018). There were no significant differences in the spinopelvic parameters or sagittal balance. The mean number of instrumented levels was 8.9. Type II osteotomies were necessary in only three patients. Three patients had a cranial sagittal angle greater than 10°, all of them asymptomatic. Postoperatively, all patients had VAS scores less than 2 and SRS-22 scores greater than 4. Hybrid bipolar posterior instrumentation offers adequate curve correction, less operative time, implant density, bleeding, material protrusion and risk of spinal cord injury, leaving a large periapical bed for graft supply. We propose to measure the flexibility of the curve in MRI. In flexible curves (those that correct at least 20% in the supine decubitus position), wide facetectomies offer adequate correction of the deformity.

Topping-Off a Long Thoracic Stabilization With Semi-Rigid Constructs May Have Favorable Biomechanical Effects to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Biomechanical Comparison.

In-vitro cadaveric biomechanical study. Long posterior spinal fusion is a standard treatment for adult spinal deformity. However, these rigid constructs are known to alter motion and stress to the adjacent non-instrumented vertebrae, increasing the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). This study aimed to biomechanically compare a standard rigid construct vs constructs "topped off" with a semi-rigid construct. By understanding semi-rigid constructs' effect on motion and overall construct stiffness, surgeons and researchers could better optimize fusion constructs to potentially decrease the risk of PJK and the need for revision surgery. Nine human cadaveric spines (T1-T12) underwent non-destructive biomechanical range of motion tests in pure bending or torsion and were instrumented with an all-pedicle-screw (APS) construct from T6-T9. The specimens were sequentially instrumented with semi-rigid constructs at T5: (i) APS plus sublaminar bands; (ii) APS plus supralaminar hooks; (iii) APS plus transverse process hooks; and (iv) APS plus short pedicle screws. APS plus transverse process hooks had a range of motion (ie, relative angle) for T4-T5 and T5-T6, as well as an overall mechanical stiffness for T1-T12, that was more favourable, as it reduced motion at adjacent levels without a stark increase in stiffness. Moreover, APS plus transverse process hooks had the most linear change for range of motion across the entire T3-T7 range. Present findings suggest that APS plus transverse process hooks has a favourable biomechanical effect that may reduce PJK for long spinal fusions compared to the other constructs examined.

Biomechanical evaluation of different semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques using finite element analysis

BackgroundProximal junctional failure is a common complication attributed to the rigidity of long pedicle screw fixation constructs used for surgical correction of adult spinal deformity. Semi-rigid junctional fixation achieves a gradual transition in range of motion at the ends of spinal instrumentation, which could lead to reduced junctional stresses, and ultimately reduce the incidence of proximal junctional failure. This study investigates the biomechanical effect of different semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques in a T8-L3 finite element spine segment model. MethodsFirst, degeneration of the intervertebral disc was successfully implemented by altering the height. Second, transverse process hooks, one- and two-level clamped tapes, and one- and two-level knotted tapes instrumented proximally to three-level pedicle screw fixation were validated against ex vivo range of motion data of a previous study. Finally, the posterior ligament complex forces and nucleus pulposus stresses were quantified. FindingsSimulated range of motions demonstrated the fidelity of the general model and modelling of semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques. All semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques reduced the posterior ligament complex forces at the junctional zone compared to pedicle screw fixation. Transverse process hooks and knotted tapes reduced nucleus pulposus stresses, whereas clamped tapes increased nucleus pulposus stresses at the junctional zone. InterpretationThe relationship between the range of motion transition and the reductions in posterior ligament complex and nucleus pulposus stresses was complex and dependent on the fixation techniques. Clinical trials are required to compare the effectiveness of semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques in terms of reducing proximal junctional failure incidence rates.

Can placement of hook at the upper instrumented level decrease the proximal junctional kyphosis risk in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Proximal junctional kyphosis is a commonly encountered clinical and radiographic phenomenon after pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity surgery that may lead to postoperative deformity, pain, and dissatisfaction. The purpose of the study was to identify whether the placement of transverse process hooks is an effective way to prevent PJK. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between November 2015 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A minimum 2-year follow-up was required. Demographic and surgical data included UIV level type of instrumentation (hook vs screw) were reported. Radiologic parameters included main curve Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and proximal junctional angle (PJA) were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of instrumentation at the UIV level whether placement of hook versus pedicle screw. Three hundred and thirty-seven patients were included with the mean age 14.2 ± 1.9years. Thirty patients (8.9%) were diagnosed with proximal junctional kyphosis radiographically. PJK incidence was found 3.2% (5/154) in the hook group and 13.3% (23/172) in the screw group and the difference found statistically significant. In the PJK group, preoperative thoracic kyphosis and the degree of kyphosis correction were also significantly higher than non-PJK patients. Placement of transverse process hooks at the UIV level in posterior spinal fusion surgery for AIS patients was associated with decreased risk of PJK. A larger preoperative kyphosis and greater degree of kyphosis correction correlated with PJK.

Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison.

Controlled laboratory study. The aim was to compare motions at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and supra-adjacent level (UIV+1) between two fixation techniques in thoracic posterior spinal fusion constructs. We hypothesized there would be greater motion at UIV+1 after cyclic loading across all constructs and bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) with posterior ligamentous compromise would demonstrate the greatest UIV+1 range of motion. Proximal junctional kyphosis is a well-recognized complication following long thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion, however, its mechanism is poorly understood. Twenty-seven thoracic functional spine units were randomly divided into three UIV fixation groups (n=9): (1) BPS, (2) bilateral transverse process hooks (TPHs), and (3) BPS with compromise of the posterior elements between UIV and UIV+1 (BPS-C). Specimens were tested on a servohydraulic materials testing system in native state, following instrumentation, and after cyclic loading. functional spine units were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending, and axial rotation. After cyclic testing, the TPH group had a mean 29.4% increase in FE range of motion at UIV+1 versus 76.6% in the BPS group ( P <0.05). The BPS-C group showed an increased FE of 49.9% and 62.19% with sectioning of the facet joints and interspinous ligament respectively prior to cyclic testing. BPSs at the UIV led to greater motion at UIV+1 compared to bilateral TPH after cyclic loading. This is likely due to the increased rigidity of BPS compared to TPH leading to a "softer" transition between the TPH construct and native anatomy at the supra-adjacent level. Facet capsule compromise led to a 49.9% increase in UIV+1 motion, underscoring the importance of preserving the posterior ligamentous complex. Clinical studies that account for fusion rates are warranted to determine if constructs with a "soft transition" result in less proximal junctional kyphosis in vivo .

Clinically relevant biomechanical properties of three different fixation techniques of the upper instrumented vertebra in deformity surgery.

Adjacent segment disease, junctional kyphosis/failure and pseudarthrosis can negatively impact the mid to long-term outcome in spinal deformity surgery. These complications might be influenced by upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) fixation techniques. In this study we analyze key biomechanical properties of three different UIV fixation techniques and define their ideal clinical use based on patient-specific risk profiles using a finite element analysis (FEA) model. A T9-pelvis posterior instrumented spinal fusion was assumed. Three different FEA models were created based on the UIV fixation technique: T9 pedicle screws (PS); T9 cortical bone screws (CBS); T9 transverse process hooks (TPH). The three FEA models consisted of T8-T10 bone and ligamentous anatomy derived from a CT scan of a healthy patient as well as spinal implants consisting of either pedicle screws, cortical bone screws or transverse process hooks as well as cobalt chromium rods. The FEA models were constrained at T10, axial load as assumed for a healthy 80kg male during flexion, extension and lateral bending were applied. As surrogate markers for risk of proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, adjacent segment disease and pseudarthrosis the following biomechanical parameters were calculated: UIV range of motion (ROM); intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1; UIV intravertebral stress and screw pull out forces. One-way ANOVA analyses have been performed to compare biomechanical outcome parameters between the three construct variants under investigation. UIV-ROM was restricted during flexion/extension/lateral bending by: PS: 73%/80%/86%, CBS: 71%/81%/85% and TPH: 62%/76%/85%. Average intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1 during flexion/extension/lateral bending was (Mega Pascal, MPa): PS 0.42/0.44/0.38, CBS 0.49/0.4/0.44, TPH 0.66/0.51/0.58; average intravertebral stress of the UIV superior endplate during flexion/extension/lateral bending was (MPa): PS 2.23/2.12/2.21, CBS 1.87/1.98/1.8, TPH 1.67/0.98/1.53. Screw pull-out forces (N) at UIV during flexion/extension/lateral bending were: PS 476/320/375, CBS 444/245/308. Statistically significant differences were found for intradiscal stress as well as vertebral body average stress (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02). Different UIV fixation techniques carry different biomechanical properties. Pedicle screw fixation is the most rigid, leading to the highest UIV stress and UIV screw pull out forces. Cortical bones screw fixation is similarly rigid; however, UIV stress and UIV screw pull out is significantly lower. Transverse process hook fixation is the least rigid, with the lowest UIV stress, however highest intradiscal stress at UIV/UIV + 1. Thus, these biomechanical differences may help select optimal UIV fixation techniques according to patient specific risk factors.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Semi-rigid Junctional Fixation Using a Novel Cable Anchor System to Prevent Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

A porcine cadaveric biomechanical study. To biomechanically evaluate a novel Cable Anchor System as semi-rigid junctional fixation technique for the prevention of proximal junctional failure after adult spinal deformity surgery and to make a comparison to alternative promising prophylactic techniques. The abrupt change of stiffness at the proximal end of a pedicle screw construct is a major risk factor for the development of proximal junctional failure after adult spinal deformity surgery. A number of techniques that aim to provide a gradual transition zone in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal junction have previously been studied. In this study, the design of a novel Cable Anchor System, which comprises a polyethylene cable for rod fixation, is assessed. Ten T6-T13 porcine spine segments were subjected to cyclic 4 Nm pure-moment loading. The following conditions were tested: uninstrumented, 3 level pedicle screw fixation (PSF), and PSF with supplementary Cable Anchors applied proximally at 1-level (Anchor1) or 2-levels (Anchor2), transverse process hooks (TPH), and 2-level sublaminar tapes (Tape2). The normalized segmental range of motion in the junctional zone was compared using one-way analysis of variance and linear regression. Statistical comparison at the level proximal to PSF showed significantly lower ROMs for all techniques compared to PSF fixation alone in all movement directions. Linear regression demonstrated a higher linearity for Anchor1 (0.820) and Anchor2 (0.923) in the junctional zone in comparison to PSF (1-level: 0.529 and 2-level: 0.421). This linearity was similar to the compared techniques (TPH and Tape2). The Cable Anchor System presented in this study demonstrated a gradual ROM transition zone at the proximal end of a rigid pedicle screw construct similar to TPH and 2-level sublaminar tape semi-rigid junctional fixation constructs, while providing the benefit of preserving the posterior ligament complex.Level of Evidence: 5.

Instrumentation Techniques to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

Study Design:Systematic review.Objectives:To summarize the results of clinical studies investigating spinal instrumentation techniques aiming to reduce the postoperative incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or failure (PJF) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.Methods:EMBASE and Medline® were searched for articles dating from January 2000 onward. Data was extracted by 2 independent authors and methodological quality was assessed using ROBINS-I.Results:18 retrospective- and prospective cohort studies with a severe or critical risk of bias were included. Different techniques were applied at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV): tethers in various configurations, 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty (2-PVP), transverse process hooks (TPH), flexible rods (FR), sublaminar tapes (ST) and multilevel stabilization screws (MLSS). Compared to a pedicle screw (PS) group, significant differences in PJK incidence were found using tethers in various configurations (18% versus 45%, P = 0.001, 15% versus 38%, P = 0.045), 2-PVP (24% vs 36%, P = 0.020), TPH (0% vs. 30%, P = 0.023) and FR (15% versus 38%, P = 0.045). Differences in revision rates for PJK were found in studies concerning tethers (4% versus 18%, P = 0.002), 2-PVP (0% vs 13%, P = 0.031) and TPH (0% vs 7%, P = n.a.).Conclusion:Although the studies are of low quality, the most frequently studied techniques, namely 2-PVP as anterior reinforcement and (tensioned) tethers or TPH as posterior semi-rigid fixation, show promising results. To provide a reliable comparison, more controlled studies need to be performed, including the use of clinical outcome measures and a uniform definition of PJF.

Optimal Anchor at the Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra in Long Fusion From the Pelvis to the Lower Thoracic Spine in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Spinal Deformity: Hook Versus Pedicle Screw.

This was a retrospective cohort study. The objective of this study was to compare pedicle screws (PSs) and transverse process hooks (TPHs) as anchors at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) in the lower thoracic spine in elderly patients with adult spinal deformity. Less-rigid fixation using hooks at the UIV are thought to best prevent proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in long spinal fusion surgery. Although adult spinal deformity is commonly treated via spinal fusion from the pelvis to the lower thoracic spine, few studies have focused on UIV anchors in the lower thoracic spine. We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients aged 65 years and above who underwent spinal fusion from the pelvis to T9 or T10, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Radiographic outcomes including the incidence of PJK and implant failure were compared between 28 patients with TPHs and 25 patients PSs at the UIV. The TPH and PS groups had similar radiographic values for pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (preoperative: 42.8 vs. 49.0 degrees, postoperative: 9.9 vs. 7.3 degrees) and the sagittal vertical axis (preoperative: 109.3 vs. 106.8 mm; postoperative: 21.9 vs. 11.2 mm). However, the incidence of PJK was significantly higher in the TPH group (35.7%) than that in the PS group (8.0%) at the 1-year follow-up (P=0.012). PJK in the TPH group was associated with UIV or UIV±1 fracture accompanied by posterior dislodgement of the TPH. Rigid fixation using PSs at the UIV in the lower thoracic spine produced better radiographic outcomes than did TPHs in elderly patients undergoing spinopelvic fusion. Level III.

Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction

BACKGROUND CONTEXTAdult spinal deformity patients treated operatively by long-segment instrumented spinal fusion are prone to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). A gradual transition in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal end of spinal instrumentation may reduce the incidence of PJK and PJF, however, previously evaluated techniques have not directly been compared. PURPOSETo determine the biomechanical characteristics of five different posterior spinal instrumentation techniques to achieve semirigid junctional fixation, or “topping-off,” between the rigid pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and the proximal uninstrumented spine. STUDY DESIGNBiomechanical cadaveric study. METHODSSeven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spine segments (T8–L3) were subjected to ex vivo pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation up to 5 Nm. The native condition, three-level PSF (T11–L2), PSF with supplemental transverse process hooks at T10 (TPH), and two sublaminar taping techniques (knotted and clamped) as one- (T10) or two-level (T9, T10) semirigid junctional fixation techniques were compared. The ROM and neutral zone (NZ) of the segments were normalized to the native condition. The linearity of the transition zones over three or four segments was determined through linear regression analysis. RESULTSAll techniques achieved a significantly reduced ROM at T10-T11 in flexion-extension and axial rotation relative to the PSF condition. Additionally, both two-level sublaminar taping techniques (CT2, KT2) had a significantly reduced ROM at T9-T10. One-level clamped sublaminar tape (CT1) had a significantly lower ROM and NZ compared with one-level knotted sublaminar tape (KT1) at T10-T11. Linear regression analysis showed the highest linear correlation between ROM and vertebral level for TPH and the lowest linear correlation for CT2. CONCLUSIONSAll studied semirigid junctional fixation techniques significantly reduced the ROM at the junctional levels and thus provide a more gradual transition than pedicle screws. TPH achieves the most linear transition over three vertebrae, whereas KT2 achieves that over four vertebrae. In contrast, CT2 effectively is a one-level semirigid junctional fixation technique with a shift in the upper rigid fixation level. Clamped sublaminar tape reduces the NZ greatly, whereas knotted sublaminar tape and TPH maintain a more physiologic NZ. Clinical validation is ultimately required to translate the biomechanics of various semirigid junctional fixation techniques into the clinical goal of reducing the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEThe direct biomechanical comparison of multiple instrumentation techniques that aim to reduce the incidence of PJK after thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery provides a basis upon which clinical studies could be designed. Furthermore, the data provided in this study can be used to further analyze the biomechanical effects of the studied techniques using finite element models to better predict their post-operative effectiveness.

Effective Prevention of Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Requires a Combination of Surgical Implant Prophylaxis and Avoidance of Sagittal Alignment Overcorrection.

Propensity score matched analysis of a multi-center prospective adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. Evaluate if surgical implant prophylaxis combined with avoidance of sagittal overcorrection more effectively prevents proximal junctional failure (PJF) than use of surgical implants alone. PJF is a severe form of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Efforts to prevent PJF have focused on use of surgical implants. Less information exists on avoidance of overcorrection of age-adjusted sagittal alignment to prevent PJF. Surgically treated ASD patients (age ≥18 yrs; ≥5 levels fused, ≥1 year follow-up) enrolled into a prospective multi-center ASD database were propensity score matched (PSM) to control for risk factors for PJF. Patients evaluated for use of surgical implants to prevent PJF (IMPLANT) versus no implant prophylaxis (NONE), and categorized by the type of implant used (CEMENT, HOOK, TETHER). Postoperative sagittal alignment was evaluated for overcorrection of age-adjusted sagittal alignment (OVER) versus within sagittal parameters (ALIGN). Incidence of PJF was evaluated at minimum 1 year postop. Six hundred twenty five of 834 eligible for study inclusion were evaluated. Following PSM to control for confounding variables, analysis demonstrated the incidence of PJF was lower for IMPLANT (n = 235; 10.6%) versus NONE (n = 390: 20.3%; P < 0.05). Use of transverse process hooks at the upper instrumented vertebra (HOOK; n = 115) had the lowest rate of PJF (7.0%) versus NONE (20.3%; P < 0.05). ALIGN (n = 246) had lower incidence of PJF than OVER (n = 379; 12.0% vs. 19.2%, respectively; P < 0.05). The combination of ALIGN-IMPLANT further reduced PJF rates (n = 81; 9.9%), while OVER-NONE had the highest rate of PJF (n = 225; 24.2%; P < 0.05). Propensity score matched analysis of 625 ASD patients demonstrated use of surgical implants alone to prevent PJF was less effective than combining implants with avoidance of sagittal overcorrection. Patients that received no PJF implant prophylaxis and had sagittal overcorrection had the highest incidence of PJF. 3.

Effect of Different Types of Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Instruments on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Pedicle Screw versus Transverse Process Hook.

Study DesignRetrospective comparative study.PurposeTo compare the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) between transverse process hooks (TPHs) and pedicle screws (PSs) at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.Overview of LiteratureThe choice of UIV implant type may be important for avoiding PJK; however, few comparative clinical studies have evaluated the incidence of PJK according to the type of UIV implant used in ASD surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 39 consecutive patients with ASD (mean age, 67 years; mean follow-up period, 41 months) who underwent corrective surgery between 2009 and 2013. TPH was used in 17 patients and PS in 22 patients. PJK was defined as the presence of a UIV or UIV±1 fracture, or a change in the proximal junctional angle (PJA) of >20°. Data of patients with TPH and PS were compared.ResultsThe TPH group had a PJK incidence of 17.6% compared with 27.3% in the PS group (p =0.47). In the TPH group, PJK was a result of UIV fracture in one patient, UIV−1 fracture in one patient, and ligamentous failure in one patient. In the PS group, six patients developed PJK because of UIV fracture. No differences in radiographic parameters were found between the two groups. After analyzing the PJA data in the patients with PJK, the changes in PJA were significantly higher in the PS group than in the TPH group (19.0°/5.0°, p =0.04).ConclusionsOur results show that using TPH as a UIV implant may not prevent PJK; however, using TPH as the UIV anchor may prevent vertebral collapse if cases of UIV fracture. The increased risk of UIV fracture collapse in the PS group may be a result of a higher mechanical load on UIV when using PS.

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention Strategies: A Video Technique Guide.

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a well-recognized complication in patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusion procedures for adult spinal deformity. Strategies that reduce rates of PJK have the potential to improve the safety of these operations and decrease cost by eliminating the need for revision surgery. To present a set of surgical techniques that can decrease rates of PJK in adults undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. We summarize the use of vertebroplasty, transverse process hooks, terminal rod contouring, and ligament augmentation as means to reduce rates of PJK. We present PJK prevention strategies and a video technique guide that are safe, technically feasible, and add minimal operative time to these surgical procedures. When applied to appropriate high-risk patients, these techniques have the potential to dramatically reduce rates of PJK, which improves quality of life and decreases the cost associated with this treating adult spinal deformity. PJK prevention strategies represent a critical area for improvement in surgery for adult spinal deformity. We present a summary of techniques that are safe, feasible, and add minimal time to the overall procedure. These techniques warrant investigation in a thoughtful, prospective manner, but are supported by existing data and compelling biomechanical rationale. Our hope is that these strategies can be applied, particularly in high-risk patients, to help reduce rates of PJK.

Impact of spinal rod stiffness on porcine lumbar biomechanics: Finite element model validation and parametric study.

A three-dimensional finite element model of the porcine lumbar spine (L1-L6) was used to assess the effect of spinal rod stiffness on lumbar biomechanics. The model was validated through a comparison with in vitro measurements performed on six porcine spine specimens. The validation metrics employed included intervertebral rotations and the nucleus pressure in the first instrumented intervertebral disc. The numerical results obtained suggest that rod stiffness values as low as 0.1 GPa are required to reduce the mobility gradient between the adjacent and instrumented segments and the nucleus pressures across the porcine lumbar spine significantly. Stiffness variations above this threshold value have no significant effect on spine biomechanics. For such low-stiffness rods, intervertebral rotations in the instrumented zone must be monitored closely in order to guarantee solid fusion. Looking ahead, the proposed model will serve to examine the transverse process hooks and variable stiffness rods in order to further smooth the transition between the adjacent and instrumented segments, while preserving the stability of the instrumented zone, which is needed for fusion.

Impact of anchor type on porcine lumbar biomechanics: Finite element modelling and in-vitro validation

BackgroundRigid posterior implants used for spinal stabilization can be anchored to the vertebrae using pedicle screws or screws combined with transverse process hooks. In the present study, a finite element model of a porcine lumbar spine instrumented with screws and hooks is presented and validated. MethodsThe porcine lumbar spine model was validated using in-vitro measurements on six porcine specimens. Validation metrics included intervertebral rotations (L1 to L6) and nucleus pressure in the topmost cranial instrumented disc. The model was used to compare the biomechanical effect of anchor types. FindingsGood agreement was observed between the model and validation experiments. For upper transverse hooks construct, intervertebral rotations increased at the upper instrumented vertebra and decreased at the adjacent level. Additionally, nucleus pressures and stress on the annulus decreased in the adjacent disc and increased in the upper instrumented disc. The pull-out forces predicted for both anchor configurations were significantly lower than the pull-out strength found in the literature. InterpretationThese numerical observations suggest that upper transverse process hooks constructs reduce the mobility gradient and cause less stress in the adjacent disc, which could potentially reduce adjacent segment disease and proximal junction kyphosis incidence without increasing the risk of fixation failure. Future work needs to assess the long-term effect of such constructs on clinical and functional outcomes.

The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) remains problematic following multilevel instrumented spine surgery. Previous biomechanical studies indicate that providing less rigid fixation at the cranial aspect of a long posterior instrumented construct, via transition rods or hooks at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), may provide a gradual transition to normal motion and prevent PJK. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of posterior anchored polyethylene tethers to distribute proximal motion segment stiffness in long instrumented spine constructs. METHODS A finite element model of a T7-L5 spine segment was created to evaluate range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, pedicle screw loads, and forces in the posterior ligament complex within and adjacent to the proximal terminus of an instrumented spine construct. Six models were tested: 1) intact spine; 2) bilateral, segmental pedicle screws (PS) at all levels from T-11 through L-5; 3) bilateral pedicle screws from T-12 to L-5 and transverse process hooks (TPH) at T-11 (the UIV); 4) pedicle screws from T-11 to L5 and 1-level tethers from T-10 to T-11 (TE-UIV+1); 5) pedicle screws from T-11 to L-5 and 2-level tethers from T-9 to T-11 (TE-UIV+2); and 6) pedicle screws and 3-level tethers from T-8 to T-11 (TE-UIV+3). RESULTS Proximal-segment range of motion (ROM) for the PS construct increased from 16% at UIV-1 to 91% at UIV. Proximal-segment ROM for the TPH construct increased from 27% at UIV-1 to 92% at UIV. Posterior tether constructs distributed ROM at the UIV and cranial adjacent segments most effectively; ROM for TE-UIV+1 was 14% of the intact model at UIV-1, 76% at UIV, and 98% at UIV+1. ROM for TE-UIV+2 was 10% at UIV-1, 51% at UIV, 69% at UIV+1, and 97% at UIV+2. ROM for TE-UIV+3 was 7% at UIV-1, 33% at UIV, 45% at UIV+1, and 64% at UIV+2. Proximal segment intradiscal pressures, pedicle screw loads, and ligament forces in the posterior ligament complex were progressively reduced with increasing number of posterior tethers used. CONCLUSIONS Finite element analysis of long instrumented spine constructs demonstrated that posterior tethers created a more gradual transition in ROM and adjacent-segment stress from the instrumented to the noninstrumented spine compared with all PS and TPH constructs. Posterior tethers may limit the biomechanical risk factor for PJK; however, further clinical research is needed to evaluate clinical efficacy.

Biomechanical assessment of the stabilization capacity of monolithic spinal rods with different flexural stiffness and anchoring arrangement

BackgroundSpinal disorders can be treated by several means including fusion surgery. Rigid posterior instrumentations are used to obtain the stability needed for fusion. However, the abrupt stiffness variation between the stabilized and intact segments leads to proximal junctional kyphosis. The concept of spinal rods with variable flexural stiffness is proposed to create a more gradual transition at the end of the instrumentation. MethodBiomechanical tests were conducted on porcine spine segments (L1–L6) to assess the stabilization capacity of spinal rods with different flexural stiffness. Dual-rod fusion constructs containing three kinds of rods (Ti, Ti–Ni superelastic, and Ti–Ni half stiff-half superelastic) were implanted using two anchor arrangements: pedicle screws at all levels or pedicle screws at all levels except for upper instrumented vertebra in which case pedicle screws were replaced with transverse process hooks. Specimens were loaded in forward flexion, extension, and lateral bending before and after implantation of the fusion constructs. The effects of different rods on specimen stiffness, vertebra mobility, intradiscal pressures, and anchor forces were evaluated. FindingThe differences in rod properties had a moderate impact on the biomechanics of the instrumented spine when only pedicle screws were used. However, this effect was amplified when transverse process hooks were used as proximal anchors. InterpretationCombining transverse hooks and softer (Ti–Ni superelastic and Ti–Ni half stiff-half superelastic) rods provided more motion at the upper instrumented level and applied less force on the anchors, potentially improving the load sharing capacity of the instrumentation.

Instrumentation Strategies to Reduce the Risks of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Scoliosis: A Detailed Biomechanical Analysis

Study DesignBiomechanical analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) through numerical simulations. ObjectivesAssessment of the effect of sagittal alignment, the upper instrumented vertebral level (UIV), and 4 other surgical variables on biomechanical indices related to the PJK risks. Summary of Background DataDespite retrospective clinical studies, biomechanical analysis of individual parameters associated with PJK is lacking to support instrumentation strategies to reduce the PJK risks. MethodsInstrumentations of 6 adult scoliosis cases with different operative strategies were simulated (1,152 simulations). Proximal junctional (PJ) angle and flexion loads were evaluated against the sagittal alignment and the proximal instrumentation level. ResultsInstrumenting 1 more proximal vertebra allowed the PJ angle, proximal moment, and force to be reduced by 18%, 25%, and 16%, respectively. Shifting sagittal alignment by 20 mm posteriorly increased the PJ angle and proximal moment by 16% and 22%, and increased the equivalent posterior extensor force by 37%. Bilateral complete facetectomy, posterior ligaments resection, and the combination of the 2 resulted in an increase of the PJ angle (by 10%, 28%, and 53%, respectively), flexion forces (by 4%, 12%, and 22%, respectively), and proximal moments (by 16%, 44%, and 83%, respectively). Transverse process hooks at UIV compared with pedicle screws allowed 26% lower PJ angle and flexion loads. The use of proximal transition rods with proximal diameter reduced from 5.5 to 4 mm slightly reduced PJ angle, flexion force, and moment (less than 8%). The increase in sagittal rod curvature from 10° to 40° increased the PJ angle (from 6% to 19%), flexion force (from 3% to 10%), and moment (from 9% to 27%). ConclusionsSimulated posteriorly shifted sagittal alignment was associated with higher PJK risks, whereas extending instrumentation proximally allowed a lower mechanical risk of PJK. Preserving PJ intervertebral elements and using a more flexible anchorage at UIV help reduce the biomechanical risks of PJK.

Transverse Process Hooks at Upper Instrumented Vertebra Provide More Gradual Motion Transition Than Pedicle Screws

Biomechanical study in a porcine model. To determine whether transverse process hooks (TPHs) placed at the proximal end of a long posterior spinal fusion construct provide a more gradual transition to normal motion of the adjacent cephalad motion segment compared with an all pedicle screw (APS) construct. Proximal junctional kyphosis after instrumentation with long posterior spinal constructs has been increasingly associated with incidence of adjacent segment pathologies. Clinical studies have suggested that proximal anchor type may affect the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis. Biomechanical tests were conducted on porcine thoracic spines before and after implantation of a long spinal fusion construct. In all specimens, dual long rods (Co-Cr) were implanted posteriorly using pedicle screws at T7-T15. Upper instrumented vertebra, T6, received either TPHs (n = 7) or pedicle screws (APSs) (n = 6). Each specimen was tested in flexion-extension then lateral bending. Moments were applied, and vertebral displacements were recorded. Range of motion (ROM) and stiffness (K) were determined for each motion segment. Differences between TPH and APS at the transition were determined using t tests. In flexion-extension, ROM at the most proximal instrumented motion segment was 9% of control for APS versus 21% of control for TPH. Difference between APS and TPH at UIV was 0.5° (P < 0.008). Stiffness of TPH at T6-T7 was significantly lower than APS in FE (P < 0.003). For APS, the greatest mean ROM occurred at the first uninstrumented segment, whereas TPH maintained the pattern of monotonic increases in mean ROM from distal to proximal. TPHs at the upper instrumented vertebra provided a more gradual transition to normal motion compared with pedicle screws in long posterior spinal fusion constructs. TPH at the upper instrumented vertebra may be postulated to decrease the incidence of postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis compared with APS. N/A.

The Influence of Proximal Anchors on the Risk of Proximal Junctional Fracture in the Osteoporotic Spine

Biomechanical comparison of the risk of proximal junctional fracture (PJF) after multilevel spinal instrumentation using pedicle screws or transverse process hooks on the top of a pedicle screw construct. To compare the loads leading to PJF when using pedicle screws or transverse process hooks at the proximal level after multilevel spinal instrumentation using pedicle screws. With stronger spinal fixation techniques, there is increased risk of PJF, especially in the osteoporotic spine. The use of transverse process hooks over pedicle screws at the proximal level of multilevel pedicle screw constructs has been proposed to decrease the incidence of PJF. However, there is no biomechanical study evaluating this concept. Twenty-four segments of 4 vertebrae from 6 human cadaveric spines were evaluated after instrumentation of the distal 3 vertebrae using pedicle screws, except at the top of the construct where either pedicle screws (AP group) or transverse process hooks (PTPH group) were placed. The proximal vertebra was left uninstrumented. Quantitative computed tomography scan was used before instrumentation in order to assess the bone density for each specimen. Cyclic compression loading between 50 and 1000 N at 1 Hz was applied to each of 24 instrumented spinal segments until obtaining a PJF. Bone density was similar between the AP and PTPH groups. A PJF occurred in 22 of 24 tested specimens. The number of cycles required to produce the PJF ranged between 2 and 1002. The number of cycles required to produce the PJF was similar between the AP construct group (median: 3; interquartile range: 3-7) and the PTPH construct group (median: 4; interquartile range: 3-5). The current study failed to observe a significant impact of using transverse process hooks over pedicle screws on top of multilevel pedicle screw construct to decrease the risk of PJF.