Abstract Background Myocardial fibrosis is a prominent pathological feature of cardiac remodelling in pressure overload. The underlying mechanisms of cardiac remodelling are complex including mechanical, inflammatory and neurohormonal factors. We have recently uncovered a pathological crosstalk between visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and heart in biological aging characterized by profibrotic proteins in both the VAT secretome and the plasma contributing to myocardial interstitial fibrosis. We hypothesize that a model of pressure overload induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC) is responsible for VAT remodelling and a VAT profibrotic secretome, which in turn worsens cardiac fibrosis and alters cardiac function. Purpose To explore the effect of pressure overload on VAT and identify a crosstalk between heart and VAT. Methods We divided wild-type male mice (5-month-old, n=10/group) into two groups: a visceral Lipectomy group and a Sham group two weeks before a moderate TAC (26G; i.e. gradient between left ventricle and aorta of 30mmHg) or a sham surgery. We sacrificed the mice at 1- and 8-week after TAC. We performed in vivo metabolic tests, echocardiography, and invasive hemodynamics, followed by ex vivo tissue analysis. We then analysed the time-course of the cardiac transcriptomic signature in TAC vs control and the impact of visceral lipectomy in both groups. Results Our results show that TAC induced not only cardiac remodelling affecting the structure and function of the heart, but also VAT fibrosis and inflammation together with activation of adrenergic receptors (Adrb3). VAT became a major source of profibrotic (TGFb and osteopontin) and proinflammatory (TNFa, IL6 and PAI1) factors as early as 1 week after TAC. Interestingly, lipectomy prevented cardiac remodelling and dysfunction. After 1 week of TAC, cardiac transcriptomic profile showed a similar upregulation of profibrotic and prohypertrophic genes in TAC groups in presence or absence of lipectomy. After 8 weeks of TAC, lipectomy prevented the upregulation of those genes and transcriptomic profile of TAC+lipectomy was similar to sham group (Figure). PCR analysis confirmed the lower expression of profibrotic (TGFb, Osteopontin), prohypertrophic (Nppa) and contractility genes (Adr1b) in TAC+Lipectomy vs TAC group after 8 weeks of TAC. Conclusion Our results suggest that VAT is detrimental to cardiac structure and function by releasing a profibrotic and a proinflammatory secretome that aggravates the cardiac remodelling induced by TAC. Conversely, lipectomy prevents the early development of TAC-induced cardiac fibrosis.