Over the last decades, various cardiac ablation technologies and procedures have been developed for patients with drug-resistant cardiac arrhythmias. It is now widely accepted that in selected patient populations, catheter ablation is an advantageous alternative to lifelong pharmacologic treatment. 1 Oral H. Scharf C. Chugh A. et al. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2355-2360 Crossref PubMed Scopus (790) Google Scholar , 2 Morady F. Sgheinman M.M. Transvenous catheter ablation of a posteroseptal accessory pathway in a patient with the Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310: 705-707 Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar , 3 Calkins H. Brugada J. Packer D.L. et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2007; 9: 335-379 Crossref PubMed Scopus (558) Google Scholar Ablation consists of delivering physical energy locally to specific myocardial regions to abolish arrhythmogenic tissue. Regardless of the energy employed, be it radiofrequency energy, cryoenergy, light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER), or ultrasound, ablation techniques are limited by the nonspecific nature of the resultant cellular damage. Myocytes perpetuating the arrhythmia experience similar damage to that of bystander cells, such as fibroblasts, adipocytes, or neurons. This can result in complications such as atrioesophageal fistula, pulmonary veins stenosis, or coronary artery injury. 4 Castaño A. Crawford T. Yamazaki M. Avula U.M.R. Kalifa J. Coronary artery pathophysiology after radiofrequency catheter ablation: review and perspectives. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8: 1975-1980 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar , 5 Cappato R. Calkins H. Chen S.A. et al. Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1100-1105 Crossref PubMed Scopus (1246) Google Scholar , 6 Pappone C. Oral H. Santinelli V. et al. Atrio-esophageal fistula as a complication of percutaneous transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2724-2726 Crossref PubMed Scopus (759) Google Scholar , 7 Sosa E. Scanavacca M. Left atrial-esophageal fistula complicating radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16: 249-250 Crossref PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar , 8 Robbins I.M. Colvin E.V. Doyle T.P. et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1769-1775 Crossref PubMed Scopus (405) Google Scholar In addition, the lack of cellular discrimination increases the required energy for ablation and can prolong procedure times.
Read full abstract