Transpedicular Screw Fixation Research Articles

Finite Element Analysis Comparing the Biomechanical Parameters in Multilevel Posterior Cervical Instrumentation Model Involving Lateral Mass Screw versus Transpedicular Screw Fixation at the C7 Vertebra.

Basic research. This finite element (FE) analysis (FEA) aimed to compare the biomechanical parameters in multilevel posterior cervical fixation with the C7 vertebra instrumented by two techniques: lateral mass screw (LMS) vs. transpedicular screw (TPS). Very few studies have compared the biomechanics of different multilevel posterior cervical fixation constructs. Four FE models of multilevel posterior cervical fixation were created and tested by FEA in various permutations and combinations. Generic differences in fixation were determined, and the following parameters were assessed: (1) maximum moment at failure, (2) maximum angulation at failure, (3) maximum stress at failure, (4) point of failure, (5) intervertebral disc stress, and (6) influence of adding a C2 pars screw to the multilevel construct. The maximum moment at failure was higher in the LMS fixation group than in the TPS group. The maximum angulation in flexion allowed by LMS was higher than that by TPS. The maximum strain at failure was higher in the LMS group than in the TPS group. The maximum stress endured before failure was higher in the TPS group than in the LMS group. Intervertebral stress levels at C6-C7 and C7-T1 intervertebral discs were higher in the LMS group than in the TPS group. For both models where C2 fixation was performed, lower von Mises stress was recorded at the C2-C3 intervertebral disc level. Ending a multilevel posterior cervical fixation construct with TPS fixation rather than LMS fixation at the C7 vertebra provides a stiff and more constrained construct system, with higher stress endurance to compressive force. The constraint and durability of the construct can be further enhanced by adding a C2 pars screw in the fixation system.

Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Navigation Versus 2-Dimensional Fluoroscopy in Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Comparative Analysis.

Several studies have advocated for the higher accuracy of transpedicular screw placement under cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to conventional 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy. The superiority of navigation systems in perioperative and postoperative outcomes remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare operative time, screw placement time and accuracy, total radiation dose, perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent transpedicular screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) using intraoperative CBCT navigation versus 2D fluoroscopy. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients affected by single-level DLS who underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation with transpedicular screw fixation using surgical CBCT navigation (NV group) or 2D fluoroscopy-assisted freehand technique (FH group). Demographics, screw placement time and accuracy, operative time, total radiation dose, intraoperative blood loss, screw revision rate, complications, and length of stay (LOS) were assessed. The study included a total of 30 patients (NV group: n = 15; FH group: n = 15). The mean screw placement time, operative time, and LOS were significantly reduced in the NV group compared to the FH group (p < 0.05). The total radiation dose was significantly higher in the NV group (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found in terms of blood loss and postoperative complications. This study suggests that intraoperative CBCT-navigated single-level lumbar transpedicular screw fixation is superior in terms of mean screw placement time, operative time, and LOS compared to 2D fluoroscopy, despite a higher intraoperative radiation exposure.

Establishing Safe Surgical Parameters for Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws: A Retrospective Study.

The study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transpedicular instrumentation for the C2 vertebra and to establish the precise anatomical parameters and boundaries within which this procedure can be safely and effectively performed. This retrospective study analyzed 66 patients who underwent C2 transpedicular screw fixation. Preoperative and postoperative axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans were examined. Anatomical measurements were taken to determine the horizontal and vertical distances from the C2 pedicle projection to the vertebral foramen using CT images. Based on the anatomical location of the vertebral artery within the C2 vertebral foramen, the patients were divided into four subgroups using the horizontal pedicle width (HPW) and vertical pedicle width (VPW) of the C2 spine. The average age of the patients included in the study was 46.48 years. The patient population comprised 32 (48.5%) males and 34 (51.5%) females. Based on the anatomical measurements, the distribution of C2 vertebra types was as follows: type 1 accounted for 68.9%, type 2 for 3.8%, type 3 for 16.7%, and type 4 for 10.6%. Significantly narrower pedicle widths were observed in types 2 and 4 compared to other vertebra types. Type 2 had the largest medial angle (MA), while type 4 had the narrowest MA. In terms of the sagittal plane, type 4 exhibited the widest MA and type 3 had the narrowest MA, but these differences were not statistically significant. Among the cases, 12 (18.1%) involved the vertebral foramen, with 1 case (8.3%) showing screw-related vertebral artery injury (0.75% of all screws). No vertebral artery injuries were observed with the other transpedicular screws. Preoperative anatomical measurements for patients undergoing transpedicular instrumentation on the C2 vertebra should include planning CT images on three planes: axial, sagittal, and coronal.

Comparison of Transpedicular Fixation with Fusion with Transpedicular Fixation Alone in Spondylolisthesis

Objective: This research evaluated the clinical outcomes of two surgical methods used to treat degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in the short term. Fixation through the pedicles with or without inter-body fusion. Utilizing a spinal cage for first- and second-degree condition patients is one of the two methods being compared. Materials &amp; Methods: A total of 28 individual lumbosacral spondylolisthesis were incorporated in the research. Based on the surgical method and fixation technique employed for their care, they were split into two groups at random. Posterolateral intertransverse bone fusion, transpedicular screw fixation, and posterior lumbar decompression operations were performed on Group A. Conversely, Group B underwent posterolateral interbody fusion via the implantation of interbody cages, transpedicular screws, and posterior decompression. Results: There existed no statistically significant association in terms of the two groups that is intraoperative and postoperative complications, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction, while noteworthy significance was observed about blood loss and rates of post-operative fusion. Conclusion: Incorporating a spinal implant in conjunction with transverse body fusion results in superior fusion rates and post-operative clinical improvements, while intertransverse bony fusion alone yields comparable patient satisfaction with reduced surgical times.

Biomechanical study of anterior transpedicular root screw intervertebral fusion system of lower cervical spine: a finite element analysis.

Background: The cervical anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation technology can provide adequate stability for cervical three-column injuries. However, its high risk of screw insertion and technical complexity have restricted its widespread clinical application. As an improvement over the ATPS technology, the cervical anterior transpedicular root screw (ATPRS) technology has been introduced to reduce the risk associated with screw insertion. This study aims to use finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of a cervical spine model after using the novel ATPRS intervertebral fusion system, providing insights into its application and potential refinement. Methods: A finite element (FE) model of the C3-C7 lower cervical spine was established and validated. After two-level (C4-C6) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery, FE models were constructed for the anterior cervical locked-plate (ACLP) internal fixation, the ATPS internal fixation, and the novel ATPRS intervertebral fusion system. These models were subjected to 75N axial force and 1.0 Nm to induce various movements. The range of motion (ROM) of the surgical segments (C4-C6), maximum stress on the internal fixation systems, and maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs were tested and recorded. Results: All three internal fixation methods effectively reduced the ROM of the surgical segments. The ATPRS model demonstrated the smallest ROM during flexion, extension, and rotation, but a slightly larger ROM during lateral bending. Additionally, the maximum bone-screw interface stresses for the ATPRS model during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were 32.69, 64.24, 44.07, 35.89MPa, which were lower than those of the ACLP and ATPS models. Similarly, the maximum stresses on the adjacent intervertebral discs in the ATPRS model during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation consistently remained lower than those in the ACLP and ATPS models. However, the maximum stresses on the cage and the upper endplate of the ATPRS model were generally higher. Conclusion: Although the novel ATPRS intervertebral fusion system generally had greater endplate stress than ACLP and ATPS, it can better stabilize cervical three-column injuries and might reduce the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Furthermore, further studies and improvements are necessary for the ATPRS intervertebral fusion system.

Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior segment fusion with laminoplasty and anterior segment fusion for treating acute extensional cervical spinal cord injury in pre-existing canal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study

Background: Patients with pre-existing cervical spinal canal stenosis (CSCS) are more likely to suffer from an extensional spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the appropriate surgical alternatives for extended cervical SCIs in individuals with pre-existing CSCS remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacies of laminoplasty and posterior short-segment fusion (PSF) with laminoplasty and anterior short-segment fusion (ASF) in the treatment of these patients. Methods: The clinical data of 258 patients from six spine centers were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two different groups based on the surgical approach: laminoplasty and PSF (PSF group) and laminoplasty and ASF (ASF group). ASIA grades and JOA scores were obtained before and after surgery to assess neurological function. Results: There were 116 patients in the PSF group and 142 patients in the ASF group. The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay were 188 min, 298 ml, and 7.6 days, respectively, in PSF group, compared to 245 min, 366 ml, and 10.4 days in PSF group, respectively. Complete decompression was achieved in all patients, and fusion was achieved 6 months after surgery. A post-operative computed tomography scan revealed that 39/464 (8.4%) screws had perforated, but no neurovascular complications occurred. Both surgical strategies improved the ASIA grade and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.926). The JOA score improved from 6.21 ± 1.85 to 10.90 ± 3.56 in the PSF group and from 6.45 ± 2.17 to 11.48 ± 3.62 in the ASF group, but at the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.134). The incidence of post-operative complications in the ASF group (24/142, 16.9%) (P = 0.043) was higher than that in the PSF group (6/116, 5.17%). Conclusions: Cervical laminoplasty combined with short-segment transpedicular screw fixation is a reliable option to treat extensional cervical SCIs in patients with CSCS. This surgical strategy is beneficial for achieving sufficient cervical spinal cord decompression, preserving cervical spine stability, and avoiding extra anterior cervical decompression and fusion, thereby reducing surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, post-operative complication rate, and length of hospital stay. Relevance for Patients: Cervical laminoplasty combined with posterior segmental fusion (PSF) reduces operative time, bleeding, and complications and achieves adequate spinal cord decompression in the treatment of extension cervical SCI in patients with CSCS.

Feasibility of a novel type of complex anterior cervical fixation by using Mimics software

To investigate the feasibility of mimics software in analyzing a new type of complex anterior cervical fixation -- anterior transpedicular screw fixation+zero notch internal fixation. From January 2021 to September 2022, 50 normal pedestrians who underwent cervical spine CT scanning were selected for C1-C7 segment scanning, including 27 males and 23 females, aged from 25 to 65 years old with an average of (46.0 ± 9.0) years old. The dicom format is exported and engraved into the CD, and use the mimics software to perform 3D reconstruction of each segment. A simulated screw is placed on the image according to the critical value of zero notch screw (head and tail angle 44°, internal angle 29°). The position of zero notch screw in each segment is observed to determine the feasibility of anterior transpedicular screw fixation plus zero notch internal fixation. For the upper zero notch screws the three-dimensional images of the cervical spine across all 50 subjects within the C3-C7 segments demonstrated safe position, with no instances of intersection with ATPS. For the lower zero notch screw, in C3-C4 and C4-C5, 4 out of 50 subjects are in the safe position in the three-dimensional images of cervical vertebrae, and 46 cases could achieve secure screw placement when the maximum caudal angle is(32.3±1.9) ° and (36.1±2.2) °, respectively. In C5-C6 and C6-C7 segments, no lower zero notch screws intersected with ATPS, and all screws are in safe positions. Lower cervical anterior pedicle screw fixation plus zero notch internal fixation can achieve successful nail placement through the selected entry point and position.

The Functional Outcome of Surgical Management of Spondylolisthesis with Posterior Stabilization and Fusion.

Spondylolisthesis is a spinal condition characterized by the forward displacement of one vertebra over another, leading to instability and associated symptoms. Surgical intervention is often recommended for patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis unresponsive to conservative treatment. The objective of this study was to analyze the functional outcomes of surgical management utilizing posterior stabilization and fusion techniques in patients with spondylolisthesis. This is a prospective study conducted on 30 patients who underwent surgical treatment for spondylolisthesis with posterior trans-pedicular screw fixation with conventional or reduction screws and fusion. Meyerding's grade of listhesis, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score and pain scores such as visual analog scale (VAS), numerical rating scale 11 (NRS-11), and pain relief rate were used to analyze the functional outcome. Postoperatively, Meyerding's grade of listhesis and the JOA score had improved significantly. The ODI score and pain scores such as VAS, NRS-11, and pain relief rate were better after surgical interventions. There was full motor recovery in 13 patients and 14 patients had full sensory recovery, while six patients had sensory blunting at the time of the time of the last follow-up. Twenty-six (80.7%) patients had clinically successful results and radiological/clinical fusion while four of the patients did not achieve a clinically successful result and radiological/clinical fusion. The average time for bony fusion was 5.58 months with the earliest being 4 months and the latest 12 months. Intraoperatively, one patient had screw slippage and one had a dural tear. Postoperatively, four patients had infection, two patients were presented with deep infection, and the instrumentation had been removed. This study demonstrated favorable functional outcomes and improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life measures following surgical intervention.

Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis of Lower Cervical Anterior Transpedicular Screw Fixation and Related Factors in the Chinese Population

Anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) internal fixation of the lower cervical spine is an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate combined anterior and posterior surgery. The cervical vertebral anatomy varies with many factors, including age, gender, height, weight, and race. Three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstructions were performed on 122 patients. We selected the best level and measured the relevant parameters on both sides of the cervical vertebrae. We identified the entry point and orientation parameters of ATPS fixation for the C3-C7 vertebrae, and analyzed cervical pedicle parameters. Outer pedicle width (OPW), outer pedicle height (OPH), and pedicle axis length (PAL) were not correlated with body weight and age, but were positively correlated with body height (P<0.05). After multiple linear regression analysis to exclude the effects of body height, no significant differences in OPW, OPH, and PAL were found between male and female subjects at most cervical levels. Pedicle cortical thickness was negatively correlated with age (P<0.05). The percentage of pedicles with OPW <4.5mm was: C3, 38.10%; C4, 34.92%; C5, 12.70%; C6, 9.52%; and C7, 0%. The percentage of pedicles with OPWs ≤4.5mm, ≤4.0mm, and ≤3.5mm was higher among subjects with body height <160cm. This study presents the internal anatomy of the cervical spine and provides accurate preoperative evaluation data for ATPS fixation. OPW, OPH, and PAL are positively correlated with body height, while pedicle cortical thickness is negatively correlated with age.

Morphometric study of cervical spinal canal and transverse foramen diameter using computed tomography: Sex difference and relationship to age in Turkish population.

Accurate and detailed spinal canal diameter transverse foraminal morphometry measurements are essential for understanding spinal column-related diseases and surgical planning, especially for transpedicular screw fixation. This is especially because lateral cervical radiographs do not provide accurate measurements. This retrospective study was conducted to measure the dimensions of the transverse foramen sagittal and transverse diameter (TFD), spinal canal diameter, the distance of the spinal canal from the transverse foramina at the C1 to C7 cervical level, and the anteroposterior and TFDs in the Turkish population. A total of 150 patients who underwent cervical spine computed tomographic imaging with a 1:1 gender ratio were enrolled in the study. The sagittal and TFDs of the spinal canal, the distance of the spinal canal from the transverse foramen, and anteroposterior and TFDs in both right and left sides for all cervical levels C1 to C7. Foramina transversal diameters were measured using imaging tools of the imaging software in the radiology unit. The mean age of the study group was 47.99 ± 18.65 (range, 18-80) years. The majority of the distances of the spinal canal from the transverse foramen and antero-posterior (AP) & transverse (T) diameters for cervical vertebrae were significantly higher in male patients (P < .05). However, between age groups, a few measurements were found significantly different. Some of the distances of the spinal canal from the transverse foramen were significantly higher on the right side whereas all AP & T diameters were significantly higher on the left side in both male and female patients (P < .05). Almost all measurements were significantly higher on the left side for younger patients (<65 years) whereas only AP & T diameters were significantly higher on the left side for older patients (>65 years) (P < .05). Computed tomographic imaging is better than conventional radiographs for the preoperative evaluation of the cervical spine and for a better understanding of cervical spine morphometry. Care must be taken during transpedicular screw fixation, especially in female subjects, more so at the C2, C4, and C6 levels due to decreased distance of the spinal canal from the transverse foramina.

Evaluation of the Outcome of Transpedicular Fixation for Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculous Spine Disease

Objective: Pakistan stands sixth in countries, contributing 60% of new TB cases worldwide. TB can involve a wide variety of organs including the spine which at times need neurosurgical intervention. This study aims to determine the overall clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with dorsolumbar spine TB managed by posterior transpedicular screw fixation. The study focused to evaluate the outcome of transpedicular screws fixation for the thoracic and lumbar tuberculous spine. Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 60 patients were observed. A complete history and systemic physical examination was done. Pre-operative anteroposterior and lateral view radiographs were taken to measure the height of the vertebral body, kyphotic angulation, and sagittal plane index. Short-segment transpedicular fixation was done under general anesthesia by consultant neurosurgeons. All patients were asked for follow-up after one month. Post-operative anteroposterior plus lateral view radiographs were done to measure the height of the vertebral body, kyphotic angulation, and sagittal index. Results: In our study mean age was 47 years. 58%patients were males and 42% of patients were female. The mean postoperative vertebral height was 18.93 mm ± 1.17 and the mean postoperative Kyphotic angle was 9.68 degree ± 4.03º. The mean postoperative Sagittal index was 5.83 ± 4.55. Conclusion: The outcome of transpedicular fixation of vertebral height was 18.93 mm ± 1.17, Kyphotic angle was 9.68 degree ± 4.03º) and Sagittal index was (5.83 ± 4.55) for thoracic &amp; lumbar tuberculous spine.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel anterior transpedicular screw-plate system for anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF): a finite element analysis.

Background and objective: Cervical fusion with vertebral body screw (VBS)-plate systems frequently results in limited biomechanical stability. To address this issue, anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation has been developed and applied preliminarily to multilevel spinal fusion, osteoporosis, and three-column injury of the cervical spine. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical differences between unilateral ATPS (UATPS), bilateral ATPS (BATPS), and VBS fixation using finite element analysis. Materials and methods: A C6 corpectomy model was performed and a titanium mesh cage (TMC) and bone were implanted, followed by implantation of a novel ATPS-plate system into C5 and C7 to simulate internal fixation with UATPS, BATPS, and VBS. Internal fixation with UATPS comprises ipsilateral transpedicular screw-contralateral vertebral body screw (ITPS-CVBS) and cross transpedicular screw-vertebral body screw (CTPS-VBS) fixations. Mobility, the maximal von Mises stress on TMC, the stress distribution and maximal von Mises stress on the screws, and the maximum displacement of the screw were compared between the four groups. Results: Compared with the original model, each group had a reduced range of motion (ROM) under six loads. After ACCF, the stress was predominantly concentrated at two-thirds of the length from the tail of the screw, and it was higher on ATPS than on VBS. The stress of the ATPS from the cranial part was higher than that of the caudal part. The similar effect happened on VBS. The screw stress cloud maps did not show any red areas reflective of a concentration of the stress on VBS. Compared with VBS, ATPS can bear a greater stress from cervical spine movements, thus reducing the stress on TMC. The maximal von Mises stress was the lowest with bilateral transpedicular TMC and increased with cross ATPS and with ipsilateral ATPS. ITPS-CVBS, CTPS-VBS, and BATPS exhibited a reduction of 2.3%-22.1%, 11.9%-2.7%, and 37.9%-64.1% in the maximum displacement of screws, respectively, compared with that of VBS. Conclusion: In FEA, the comprehensive stability ranked highest for BATPS, followed by CTPS-VBS and ITPS-CVBS, with VBS demonstrating the lowest stability. Notably, utilizing ATPS for fixation has the potential to reduce the occurrence of internal fixation device loosening after ACCF when compared to VBS.

Lumbosacral Traumatic Spondylolisthesis L5 to S1-Classification and Surgical Management of a Difficult Presentation.

Lumbosacral traumatic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 is a rare clinical entity that compromises the stability of the L5 vertebra by displacing it anteriorly, laterally, or posteriorly on the S1 vertebral body secondary to osteotendinous and/or articular compromise of this segment due to trauma. This pathology is difficult to classify and manage; although surgical management remains the gold standard, short- and long-term results in the literature are scarce and highly variable. We present the case of a 53-year-old patient with lumbar trauma due to a free fall from a height of 6 meters. The fall resulted in cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbosacral traumatic spondylolisthesis L5-S1, which required immediate surgical management. For surgical management, we used a posterior approach for L5-S1 transpedicular screw fixation, spinal decompression, bilateral root foraminotomy of L5, and L5-S1 open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open reduction. After the operation, the patient reported immediate improvement of postoperative lower extremities pain and was discharged on the third postoperative day after achieving clinical improvement with physical therapy and bladder rehabilitation exercises. Lumbosacral traumatic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 is an unusual pathology that requires further study as there is currently no standardized classification. Surgical management is the gold standard and includes open reduction with short transpedicular screw fixation in segment L5-S1 and other surgical interventions such as extension to the pelvis with iliac screws, screws to the L4 vertebral body, and use of lumbar interbody fusion cages.

Restoring vertebral height in the treatment of multilevel vertebral compression fractures with vertebroplasty

BackgroundOsteoporosis (OP) is the fourth leading cause of disability in the elderly. The challenges presented by OP fractures are complex. Vertebral body fractures (VCF) are frequently encountered in osteoporotic patients. Due to the predominant age group of osteoporotic VCF along with co-morbidities, restoring the vertebral body height and the correction of kyphosis via minimally invasive methods are preferred. Vertebroplasty continues to be the most commonly employed method in this selection. The purpose of this study is to provide evidence for the combined employment of vertebroplasty with other minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of osteoporotic VCF. A retrospective analysis of patients treated for multilevel thoracolumbar osteoporotic VCF was performed. The patients were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion supplemented by vertebroplasty (TLIF-VP) and minimally invasive transpedicular screw fixation supplemented by vertebroplasty (TP-VP). They were followed up for at least a year and VAS and ODI scores along with the degree of kyphotic correction and restoration of vertebral body height have been evaluated.ResultsSixty patients with 132 levels of VCF treated were evaluated. PVP was superior in terms of shortened operative period, decreased blood loss, earlier ambulation and not requiring general anesthesia. Both TLIF-VP and TP-VP required general anesthesia, with longer operative period and increased blood loss, however it provided greater kyphotic correction. Restoration of vertebral body height was the highest in the PVP and TP-VP group. All patients benefited clinically from the interventions in regard to VAS pain and ODI scores.ConclusionsVP continues to be the choice for minimally invasive correction of osteoporotic VCF. VP can be employed with other techniques as seen in this study in selected patients with sufficient symptomology. TLIF implantation allowed for discectomy and sufficient root decompression while transpedicular screw fixation allowed for greater correction especially in the chronic fractures.

A comparative study between functional and radiological outcome of short and long segment transpedicular fixation for unstable thoracolumbar vertebral fractures

: Management of unstable thoracolumbar fracture remains controversial between short segment and long segment pedicle screw fixation. Surgical stabilization is indicated to adequately decompress the spinal canal, maximizing neurological recovery and creating spinal stability. : A comparative study in unstable thoracolumbar fractures fixed with short and long segment transpedicular screw fixation was done and followed up for 6 months. For functional assessment Modified MACNAB criteria, Oswestry disability index and Visual analogue scale scoring system used. Neurological status, radiological kyphotic angle correction were analyzed.: A total of 30 cases were included in the study of which 23 were male and 7 females. The mean age was 36.77 years. Younger individuals were more susceptible to road traffic accident. L1 was the most common vertebral level involved. Cases with a higher ASIA grade had a better improvement post operatively compared to one with a lesser ASIA grade preoperatively (P Value 0.003). Cases with lesser number of transfers had a better outcome at final followup. (P value 0.018). At all months of followup both short and long segment fixation groups have statistically significant kyphotic deformity correction, but long segment have better correction with 19.86 degrees pre-operative to 8.8 degrees at the end of 6 month of followup. : Short segment transpedicular fixation gives better functional outcome than long segment transpedicular fixation, but long segment transpedicular stabilization gives better radiological results in the form of kyphotic deformity correction.

Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transpedicular screw fixation: Comparison between conventional double position versus navigation-assisted single lateral position.

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedures involve anterior insertion of interbody cage in lateral position. Following OLIF, insertion of pedicle screws and rod system is performed in a prone position (OLIF-con). The location of the cage is important for restoration of lumbar lordosis and indirect decompression. However, inserting the cage at the desired location is difficult without reduction of spondylolisthesis, and reduction after insertion of interbody cage may limit the amount of reduction. Recent introduction of spinal navigation enabled both surgical procedures in one lateral position (OLIF-one). Therefore, reduction of spondylolisthesis can be performed prior to insertion of interbody cage. The objective of this study was to compare the reduction of spondylolisthesis and the placement of cage between OLIF-one and OLIF-con. We retrospectively reviewed 72 consecutive patients with spondylolisthesis for this study; 30 patients underwent OLIF-one and 42 underwent OLIF-con. Spinal navigation system was used for OLIF-one. In OLIF-one, the interbody cage was inserted after reducing spondylolisthesis, whereas in OLIF-con, the cage was inserted before reduction. The following parameters were measured on X-rays: pre- and postoperative spondylolisthesis slippage, reduction degree, and the location of the cage in the disc space. Both groups showed significant improvement in back and leg pains (p < .05). Transient motor or sensory changes occurred in three patients after OLIF-con and in two patients after OLIF-one. Pre- and postoperative slips were 26.3±7.7% and 6.6±6.2% in OLIF-one, and 23.1±7.0% and 7.4±5.8% in OLIF-con. The reduction of slippage was 74.4±6.3% after OLIF-one and 65.4±5.7% after OLIF-con, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = .04). The cage was located at 34.2±8.9% after OLIF-one and at 42.8±10.3% after OLIF-con, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = .004). Switching the sequence of surgical procedures with OLIF-one facilitated both the reduction of spondylolisthesis and the placement of the cage at the desired location.

Unilateral biportal endoscopic technique combined with percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological symptoms: technical note and preliminary report

BackgroundPrevious studies on thoracolumbar fractures with neurological symptoms have focused on how to achieve satisfactory fracture reduction, adequate nerve decompression, and stable spinal alignment. With the development of the minimally invasive spine surgery technique, achieving satisfactory treatment results and reducing iatrogenic trauma at the same time has become a new goal of spinal surgery. This research used percutaneous transpedicular screw distraction to partially reduce the fractured vertebrae, followed by completing nerve decompression and reducing residual displacement bone fragments with the assistance of the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique to achieve full protection of bone-ligament tissue and obtain good clinical efficacy.MethodsGuide wires were safely inserted into the fractured vertebra and adjacent upper and lower vertebra under the surveillance of anteroposterior and lateral X-ray fluoroscopy. Transpedicular screws were implanted via guide wires on the side with mild neurological deficits or bone fragment compression (the opposite side of the endoscopic operation). A titanium rod was installed and moderately distracted to reduce the fractured vertebra. Then, under the guidance of the endoscopic view, the laminectomy and ligamentum flavum resection were completed according to the position of the protruding bone fragment into the spinal canal, and the compressed dural sac or nerve root was fully exposed and decompressed. An L-shaped replacer was used to reduce residual bone fragments. The ipsilateral transpedicular screws and rod were installed and adjusted to match the contralateral side. The drainage tube was indwelled, and the incision was closed. The preoperative and postoperative images of the patients were evaluated, and the recovery of neurological symptoms was observed.ResultsSurgery was successfully completed on all six patients, and no intraoperative conversion to open surgery was performed. Postoperative images showed good reduction of the protruding bone fragment and good placement of all screws. At the last follow-up, the neurological symptoms of all patients returned to normal.ConclusionThe UBE technique combined with percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with neurological symptoms can effectively achieve the reduction of displaced bone fragments, improve damaged nerve function, stabilize spinal alignment, and protect the integrity of bone-ligament tissue.

Transpedicular Screw Fixation of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture Open Versus Percutaneous Technique

Objective: To determine meantime to return to work of patients with traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture managed with open versus percutaneous trans-pedicular screw fixation. Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial conducted in a joint venture of orthopedic and neurosurgeons in a private hospital of Lahore. Study was completed in six months duration from July to December 2022. 80 patients having traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures presenting to the study hospital and falling in inclusion criteria were enrolled into this study. Two groups made containing equal number of patients in each (n=40). One group underwent open transpedicular screw fixation and other group underwent percutaneous trans-pedicular screw fixation. Monthly follow up was done and the time taken return to work (TTRW) was noted. Results: Mean age of the patients was 34.62 years. There were 40(50%) male and 40(50%) female patients in the study group (n=80). Mean time taken return to work after the surgery was 3.1±0.61 months in group-A (percutaneous screw fixation) versus 5.2±0.84 months in group-B (open screw fixation). The difference in two groups regarding TTRW was significant (p&lt;0.005). Male and female patients showed significant difference in TTRW within group-A (p=0.021) while no significance difference found in TTRW among male and female patients within group-B (p=0.18). Duration of the procedure had significant impact on TTRW (p=0.001). Practical Implication: Percutaneous technique has been proved to be safer, quicker and minimal invasive method that should replace open technique. It is recommended to conduct comparative randomized controlled trials on larger study groups to obtain more data regarding outcomes of percutaneous versus open technique. This study helps us to understand comparatively safety, efficacy and feasibility of both techniques so that better treatment option may be used in such patients for better outcomes. Conclusion: We concluded that time taken return to work was shorter in the patients treated by percutaneous technique of transpedicular screw fixation versus those patients treated by open technique. Percutaneous technique has shorter duration of the procedure, less morbidity, early recovery and more effective. Keywords: Transpedicular screw fixation, Thoracolumbar spine fracture, Spinal cord injury, Time taken return to work

The Prevalence of Adjacent Segment Disease and Reoperation Following Transpedicular Screw Fixation of Lumbar Spine

The Prevalence of Adjacent Segment Disease and Reoperation Following Transpedicular Screw Fixation of Lumbar Spine

Pseudoaneurysm formation of segmental artery with retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous transpedicular screws insertion

Vascular injury is one of the potential complications of percutaneous transpedicular screws fixation. Carefully review the vascular anatomy preoperatively is important. Once unexpected low blood pressure or anemia occurs, vascular injury should be taken into consideration.