Transosseous-equivalent Technique Research Articles

Arthroscopic transosseous anchorless rotator cuff repair reduces bone defects related to peri-implant cyst formation: a comparison with conventional suture anchors using propensity score matching.

The transosseous anchorless repair (ToR) technique was recently introduced to avoid suture anchor-related problems. While favorable outcomes of the ToR technique have been reported, no previous studies on peri-implant cyst formation with the ToR technique exist. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes and prevalence of peri-implant cyst formation between the ToR technique and the conventional transosseous equivalent technique using suture anchors (SA). Cases with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) between 2016 and 2018 treated with the double-row suture bridge technique were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into ToR and SA groups. To compare clinical outcomes, 19 ToR and 57 SA cases without intraoperative implant failure were selected using propensity score matching (PSM). While intraoperative implant failure rate was analyzed before PSM, retear rate, peri-implant cyst formation rate, and functional outcomes were compared after PSM. The intraoperative implant failure rate (ToR, 8% vs. SA, 15.3%) and retear rate (ToR, 5.3% vs. SA, 19.3%) did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, peri-implant cysts were not observed in the ToR group, while they were observed in 16.7% of the SA group (P=0.008). Postoperative functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). The ToR technique produced comparable clinical outcomes to conventional techniques. Considering the possibility of additional surgeries, the absence of peri-implant cyst formation might be an advantage of ToR. Furthermore, ToR might reduce the medical costs related to suture anchors and, thereby, could be a useful option for ARCR.

Arthroscopic Knotless Separate Layer Transosseous Equivalent Repair of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

Delamination of rotator cuff tears presents a challenge for surgeons. Recognizing and repairing such a complex tear pattern often require innovative approaches to achieve an anatomic restoration of footprint. In this Technical Note, we described our preferred method that anatomically repairs both layers of delaminated rotator cuff tear separately in a knotless transosseous equivalent technique. Two sutures are placed to the articular layer in a cinch stitch configuration. Then, closed-loop end sutures are passed through both layers while keeping the closed-loop end at the working portal. The free ends of cinch stitches are loaded to anchors with a preloaded fiber tape loop, which is placed to the medial row while approximating the articular layer onto its footprint. Fiber tapes are then shuttled through both layers of tendon with the help of a previously placed closed-loop suture. Finally, the lateral row anchors are placed while fiber tapes are tensioned in a cross-bridge configuration. We believe that this technique may facilitate uneventful healing of delaminated rotator cuffs by providing the biomechanical properties of transosseous equivalent repair.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the use of a fascia lata autograft or a dermal allograft is an established treatment in treating irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears. The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) has been recently proposed as an alternative graft for SCR. The purpose of this study was to present the surgical techniques and clinical studies utilizing the LHBT for SCR. Material and Methods: Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane library were searched for relevant studies up to December 2020. The primary outcomes were pain intensity improvement and the incidence of RC and LHBT graft retears. Secondary outcomes were functional scores and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) improvements. Results: Nine studies described surgical techniques of SCR using the LHBT, and four clinical studies reported the outcomes of the technique. The mean pain intensity improved from 4.9 ± 2.3 to 1.6 ± 1.5 in terms of the visual analog scale, exceeding the minimum clinically important difference for adequate pain relief. Significant improvements were also noted in functional scores and AHD. When compared with other repair techniques for massive RC tears, i.e., the double-row repair, the transosseous-equivalent technique with absorbable patch reinforcement, and the traditional SCR with a fascia lata autograft, there were no significant differences in pain and function improvements. Conclusion: SCR using the LHBT is a useful treatment option for massive RC tears; it is equally effective with the traditional SCR and other established techniques. It presents numerous advantages being a safe, easy, time-saving, and cost-effective method. The only precondition for the technique is the presence of an intact LHBT. Additional clinical trials are necessary to determine which treatment is superior for treating massive RC tears, as well as to evaluate the long-term results of the technique.

Comparison of 3 supraspinatus tendon repair techniques – a 3D computational finite element analysis

Considering that optimal contact area and pressure at the tendon-bone interface are associated with better footprint repair and outcomes, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of standard double-row, transosseous equivalent (TOE), and partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) techniques for the treatment of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon using 3D finite element models. Loading consisted, alternately, in a preloading of 10 N and 20 N of the sutures. The footprint coverage of the standard double-row, TOE, and PASTA techniques was estimated to represent 19%, 30%, and 35%, respectively, of the repair area. The average contact pressures followed an opposite trend, i.e., the largest was estimated for the standard double-row technique, whereas the lowest was estimated for the PASTA technique. Despite the present study advancing the computational modelling of rotator cuff repair, and the results being consistent with the literature, its findings must be evaluated cautiously, bearing in mind its limitations.

Functional and MRI outcomes of Superior Capsule Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix

Objectives:Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is an emerging treatment option for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT). The initial description utilized fascia lata autograft, but acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become the graft of choice in the United States. Several reports have demonstrated excellent short-term functional improvement and patient satisfaction, but there is limited data correlating imaging studies of graft integrity to functional outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine if functional outcome after SCR is dependent on dermal allograft integrity on post-operative MRI.Methods:Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent an SCR by one of 5 fellowship-trained surgeons at a single institution for the indication of pain attributable to irreparable MRCT that failed non-operative treatment. Exclusion criteria included arthritis, prior infection, revision SCR, and less than 6 months follow-up. Pre- operative data including age, gender, prior surgery, Hamada grade, and Goutallier stage were recorded. Intra-operative data including surgical findings and concomitant procedures were recorded. Pre- and post-operative acromiohumeral distance (AHD), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Oxford, visual analogue scale (VAS) and post-operative SANE score were recorded. In 90% of cases, a 3 mm ADM was used and in 10% of cases, a 6 mm ADM was used (doubled over 3 mm graft). All grafts were fixed by a double-row, trans-osseous equivalent technique on the tuberosity and with a mean of 3 anchors on the glenoid. Patients were routinely offered to undergo an MRI postoperatively regardless of symptoms.Results:53 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 60.1+7.9 years (range 34 to 77). 68% were male; 34% had at least one prior procedure; 58% had a concomitant procedure; 57% were Hamada 1, 38% Hamada 2, and 5% Hamada 3. Pre-op Goutallier stage was 3.7% grade 0, 17% grade 1, 40% grade 2; 26% grade 3; 13% grade 4. The mean clinical follow-up was 15+7.8 months (range 6-42 months). 81% of patients underwent an MRI post-operatively. The mean time for MRI was 14+7 months (range 6 -40). MRI revealed that 38% had a completely intact graft, 33% had a tear from the glenoid, 12% had a mid-substance tear, 14% tear from the tuberosity, and 2% had complete graft absence. There was a significant improvement in ASES (37.7 to 79.5, P<0.0001), Oxford (26.3 to 44, P<0.0001), and VAS (7 vs 2.3, P<0.0001). There was no difference between pre-op and post-op AHD (7.3 mm vs 6.9mm, P=0.57). There was no association between pre-operative AHD (P=0.9), Goutallier stage (P=0.43), Hamada grade (P=0.49) with post-operative ASES scores. There was a significant correlation between graft integrity with final outcome. There was no difference in post-operative ASES score when the graft was completely intact or torn from the glenoid (P=0.39), but graft tear from the tuberosity resulted in a significantly lower ASES score (P=0.013).Conclusions:In patients who undergo SCR for MRCT, there is significant improvement in ASES, Oxford, and VAS. This improvement is seen in patients who have an intact graft, as well as those where the graft is torn from the glenoid, but not those torn from the tuberosity. This supports the concept of the graft functioning as a ”biologic tuberoplasy” preventing bone-to-bone contact between the tuberosity and acromion. Preoperative AHD, Goutallier, Hamada, gender, or age did not have an association with post-operative ASES scores.

Factors influencing operative time in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparison of knotless single-row vs. transosseous equivalent dual-row techniques

Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR), there remains considerable debate on the benefits of a dual-row vs. a single-row (SR) repair technique. This study compares operative time of a knotless SRtechnique with transosseous equivalent (TOE) dual-row techniquefor aRCR and defines patient-specific factors that affect operative time. Data from 118 patients who underwent aRCR with a knotless SR technique was compared with data from 95 patients who underwent aRCR with a TOE technique by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2018. Baseline patient demographic information and operative time were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if demographic information or tear size influenced operative time. The average operative time in the SR group was 75.68 minutes and the average operative time in the TOE group was 89.24 minutes (P < .001). When controlling for all concomitant procedures, the operative time in the TOE group was 8.1 minutes longer than the SR group (P = .029). Average tear size in an anterior-posterior direction was larger in the TOE group vs. the SR group, 26.09 mm vs. 15.18 mm (P < .001). When controlling for concomitant procedures, a knotless, TOE dual-row technique for aRCR adds an average of 8 minutes' operative time compared with a knotless SR technique. This was despite a significantly larger tear size in the TOE group.

Arthroscopic Knotless-Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair.

The most common type of rotator cuff lesion is a tear of the supraspinatus tendon, with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair representing an established treatment option1-3. Several double-row techniques have been described to achieve complete coverage of the rotator cuff footprint. Among these is the bridging, double-row, transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair, which has become one of the most popular techniques for its maximized contact area and initial fixation strength4-9. However, medial cuff failure is a common complication following this procedure9-14. To reduce medial strangulation and overall surgical time, all-knotless anchor repair has been introduced as an alternative technique15. The arthroscopic knotless, bridging, double-row, transosseous-equivalent technique is performed with the patient in the beach-chair position via lateral operative and viewing portals. A medial row of suture anchors is placed in the usual fashion. The tendon is then perforated twice per anchor with use of a suture-passer device, after which the suture limbs are bridged over the tendon and fixed in a lateral row of anchors. Excellent functional outcomes as well as satisfaction in >90% of patients have been reported with the supraspinatus knotted double-row, bridging, transosseous-equivalent repair4,9,11,13,16-19. No significant differences have been reported for clinical results and tendon integrity on magnetic resonance imaging when comparing knot-tying and knotless double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair; however, the rate of medial cuff failure was lower among knotless procedures1,12,16,17,20-25. The major steps of the procedure, which are demonstrated in this video article, include (1) diagnostic arthroscopy; (2) supraspinatus tear visualization and debridement; (3) decortication of the footprint on the greater tuberosity; (4) placement of the medial row of anchors loaded with nonabsorbable suture tape; (5) separate suture passage of each limb, perforating the tendon with use of a suture passer; (6) fixation of the tape in the lateral row of anchors, creating a bridging configuration; and (7) anterolateral acromioplasty with use of an arthroscopic burr. Complications are rare following this procedure. As postoperative rehabilitation is essential for tendon healing, the operative arm should be placed in an abduction brace for 6 weeks, with only passive mobilization.

Minimum Five-year Outcomes and Clinical Survivorship for Arthroscopic Transosseous-equivalent Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair.

Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair (RCR) techniques, midterm outcome data are limited. The purpose of this article was to assess midterm clinical outcomes of patients following arthroscopic TOE RCR using either a knotless tape bridge (TB) repair or knotted suture bridge (SB) repair technique. We hypothesized that there would be significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes with TOE RCR that would be durable over time. We also hypothesized that the knotless TB technique would yield equivalent clinical results to the knotted SB technique, but that there would be differences in retear types between the two TOE techniques. Patients included were a minimum of 5 years from an index arthroscopic double-row TOE repair using either a knotless TB or knotted SB technique for one, two, or three tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus tendon. Preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and satisfaction scores were collected. Scores were also stratified and compared based on primary and revision repair, tear location, and tear chronicity. Outcomes between techniques were contrasted, and survivorship analysis was conducted, with failure defined as progression to revision surgery. One-hundred ninety-two shoulders were included with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 5.0 to 11.0 years). Fifteen shoulders (7.8%) underwent revision cuff repair. All scores improved significantly for TB repair (P < 0.001). For SB repair, all scores improved, but only American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary scores (P < 0.05) demonstrated statistical significance. No statistically significant differences were found between the repair techniques when stratified by primary and revision repairs, tear location, or chronicity. Postoperative clinical survivorship was 96.6% and 93.6% for knotted SB repairs and 96.7% and 93.9% for knotless TB repairs at 2 and 5 years, respectively. TOE RCR results in significant clinical improvement and excellent survivorship at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up, using either knotted SB or knotless TB repair techniques in primary and revision cases and in small and large tears. Equivalent results were obtained with both TOE techniques. Patients undergoing repair with a TOE showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes that were durable at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively.

Improved Rotator Cuff Footprint Contact Characteristics With an Augmented Repair Construct Using Lateral Edge Fixation

Background: The transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair construct has become the gold standard for the repair of medium and large rotator cuff tears. Repair failure, however, continues to be a problem. One contributing factor may be the inability of the TOE repair to replicate the native footprint contact characteristics during shoulder movement, especially in rotation. This results in higher strain across the repair, which leads to gapping and predisposes the construct to failure. In an effort to better reproduce the native compression forces throughout the footprint, an augmented TOE construct supplemented with lateral edge fixation is proposed, and the contact characteristics were compared with those of the gold standard TOE construct. Hypothesis: The augmented TOE repair will demonstrate improved footprint contact characteristics when compared with the classic TOE repair. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders underwent supraspinatus repair using both the classic TOE double-row construct and the augmented TOE repair. For the augmented repair, 2 luggage tag sutures were used to secure the lateral edge and incorporated into the lateral row anchors. A Tekscan pressure sensor (Tekscan Inc) placed under the repaired tendon was used to collect footprint contact area, force, peak pressure, and contact pressure data for each construct. Results: The augmented construct demonstrated significantly greater contact forces (average difference, 4.9 N) and significantly greater contact pressures (average difference, 23.1 kPa) at all degrees of abduction and all degrees of rotation. At 30° of internal and 30° of external rotation at both 0° and 30° of shoulder abduction, the augmented construct demonstrated significantly greater peak contact pressures. Conclusion: The augmented construct showed superior contact characteristics when compared with the classic TOE technique. The addition of lateral edge fixation to the classic TOE repair significantly improves bone-tendon contact characteristics with minimal additional surgical effort. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study indicate that lateral augmentation of the classic TOE repair produces a biomechanically superior construct that may optimize tendon healing.

Arthroscopic Knotless Separate Layer Transosseous Equivalent Repair of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

Delamination of rotator cuff tears presents a challenge for surgeons. Recognizing and repairing such a complex tear pattern often require innovative approaches to achieve an anatomic restoration of footprint. In this Technical Note, we described our preferred method that anatomically repairs both layers of delaminated rotator cuff tear separately in a knotless transosseous equivalent technique. Two sutures are placed to the articular layer in a cinch stitch configuration. Then, closed-loop end sutures are passed through both layers while keeping the closed-loop end at the working portal. The free ends of cinch stitches are loaded to anchors with a preloaded fiber tape loop, which is placed to the medial row while approximating the articular layer onto its footprint. Fiber tapes are then shuttled through both layers of tendon with the help of a previously placed closed-loop suture. Finally, the lateral row anchors are placed while fiber tapes are tensioned in a cross-bridge configuration. We believe that this technique may facilitate uneventful healing of delaminated rotator cuffs by providing the biomechanical properties of transosseous equivalent repair.

Current Concepts in Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: Biomechanical, Functional, and Structural Outcomes.

There is substantial evidence indicating that double-row (DR) repair restores more of the anatomic rotator cuff footprint and is biomechanically superior to single-row (SR) repair. Transosseous-equivalent (TOE) techniques have shown biomechanical advantages when compared with traditional DR, including increased contact at the rotator cuff footprint, higher pressure at the tendon-bone interface, and increased failure strength. Several meta-analyses of evidence level 1 and 2 studies have shown a lower rate of failed/incomplete healing when DR repair was compared with SR repair types. There is some limited evidence that TOE techniques improve healing rates in large and massive tears as compared with SR and DR. Overall, most level 1 and 2 studies have failed to prove a significant difference between SR and DR repairs in terms of clinical outcomes. However, most studies include only short-term follow-up, minimizing the impact that the higher rate of retears/failed healing seen with SR repairs can have in the long term. There are no high-quality clinical studies comparing different DR configurations, and there are currently not enough clinical data to determine the functional advantages of various DR technique modifications over one another. Although numerous biomechanical and clinical studies comparing different rotator cuff repair techniques have been published in the past decade, none has achieved universal acceptance. It is essential for the orthopaedic surgeon to know in detail the available literature to be able to apply the most appropriate and cost-effective technique in terms of healing and functional outcomes. This review provides a critical analysis of the comparative biomechanical and clinical studies among SR, DR, and TOE techniques reported in the literature in the past decade.

Does Medial-Row Fixation Technique Affect the Retear Rate and Functional Outcomes After Double-Row Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair?

Background:Double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair techniques have been widely accepted because of their superior biomechanical properties when compared with arthroscopic single-row repair. Concerns regarding repair overtensioning with medial-row knot tying have led to increased interest in knotless repair techniques; however, there is a paucity of clinical data to guide the choice of technique.Hypothesis:Arthroscopic TOE repair techniques using knotless medial-row fixation will demonstrate lower retear rates and greater improvements in the Constant score relative to conventional knot-tying TOE techniques.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic review of 3 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies that examined repair integrity or Constant scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with TOE techniques. Two investigators independently screened results for relevant articles. Data regarding the study design, surgical technique, retear rate, and Constant shoulder score were extracted from eligible studies. A quality assessment of all articles was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.Results:The systematic review identified a total of 32 studies (level of evidence, 1-4) that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 32 studies, 5 reported on knotless TOE techniques, 25 reported on knot-tying TOE techniques, and 2 reported on both. In the knotless group, retear rates ranged from 6% to 36%, and Constant scores ranged from 38-65 (preoperative) to 73-83 (postoperative). In the knot-tying group, retear rates ranged from 0% to 48%, and Constant scores ranged from 42-64 (preoperative) to 55-96 (postoperative).Conclusion:Despite several theoretical advantages of knotless TOE repair, both knotless and knot-tying techniques reported considerable improvement in functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Although tendon failure rates showed a downward trend in knotless studies, additional prospective studies are warranted to better understand the role of medial-row fixation on tendon repair integrity and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Arthroscopic Transosseous Anchorless Rotator Cuff Repair Using the X-Box Technique

We describe a reproducible, step-by-step arthroscopic technique for anchorless transosseous rotator cuff repair using an X-box configuration with the Arthrotunneler device. The technique uses 2 bone tunnels and 4 high-strength sutures and is suitable for medium to large tears of the supra- and infraspinatus that would alternatively need a double-row repair with 4 anchors. Biomechanically, results appear to be similar as for anchored transosseous equivalent techniques. Enhanced biological healing and lower material costs are the possible benefits of this appealing arthroscopic approach that mimics the previous gold standard.

Evaluating strategies and outcomes following rotator cuff tears.

Rotator cuff tear surgical repair techniques have significantly progressed. However, tendon retear following primary repair persistently occurs at high rates. Rehabilitation protocols, surgical fixation techniques, biologic therapy with scaffolds, platelet-rich plasma, and even stem cell applications are under study to promote adequate tendon healing. A nonsystematic query of the PubMed database was conducted in July 2016 utilizing the search terms "rotator cuff repair," "tear," "rehabilitation," "scaffold," "platelet-rich plasma," and "stem cell" to identify, analyze, and summarize relevant studies. Individualized rehabilitation protocols may be the best approach for small to medium sized tears. Surgical fixation will continue to be debated as modifications to single-row technique and increases in suture number have improved tensile strength. Double-row repairs have been associated with higher costs. Transosseous equivalent technique exhibits comparable subjective and objective outcomes to single- and double-row repair at two-year follow-up. Biocompatible scaffold augmentation has showed inconsistent short-term results. Platelet-rich plasma has lacked uniformity in treatment preparation, administration, and outcome measurement with mixed results. Few human studies have suggested decreased retear rates and improved repair maintenance following bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell augmentation. This review reiterated the necessity of additional high-quality, large-sample studies to develop any final verdict regarding efficacy.

Technique and Outcomes for Knotless Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair

Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder disability. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs can lead to significant improvement in pain and function, though follow-up imaging studies may still demonstrate a substantial rate of rotator cuff tendon re-tearing. The double-row transosseous-equivalent repair is biomechanically superior to other repair techniques and thereby may improve tendon-to-bone healing. This article describes our preferred technique for knotless rotator cuff repair using a transosseous-equivalent technique.

Porcine Dermis Patch Augmentation of Supraspinatus Tendon Repairs: A Pilot Study Assessing Tendon Integrity and Shoulder Function 2 Years After Arthroscopic Repair in Patients Aged 60 Years or Older

To investigate the 2-year postoperative clinical and subjective outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with xenologous porcine dermal patch augmentation compared with ARCR alone. Patients aged 60years or older with a complete supraspinatus (SSP) tendon tear underwent primary ARCR with a transosseous-equivalent technique. By use of a matched-pair comparative trial design, a consecutive series of 20 patients receiving additional xenologous porcine dermal patch augmentation (patch group) was matched by tear location with 20 patients who received ARCR only (control group). Prior conservative treatment failed in all patients. Patients with concomitant pathologies precluding accurate repair assessment, partial or open reconstruction, or a latissimus dorsi and/or pectoralis major muscle transfer were excluded. Patients reported daily pain levels for 10days after surgery. Clinical parameters and various patient-reported outcome scores were documented preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 24months after surgery. Repair integrity was determined by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound at 24months. Adverse events were recorded. Group outcome differences were analyzed with t tests, Fisher exact tests, and mixed models. Patients in both groups were aged 67years on average (range, 60-74years), and 70% of patients were men. Patients in the patch group had slightly more SSP fatty infiltration preoperatively. Patch surgical procedures were on average 22minutes longer than control interventions (P= .003). At 24months, 4 patients and 9 patients were diagnosed with a recurrent SSP tendon defect in the control group (n= 20) and patch group (n= 19), respectively (relative risk, 2.4; P= .096). Of 11 defects (85%) identified as medial cuff failure, 8 occurred in the patch group. Pain rated by all patients decreased from postoperative day 1 to day 10 without any significant group difference (P= .348). No significant group differences were noted for other outcome parameters, and recurrent defects had no relevant effect on functional outcomes. Local complications (including recurrent defects) occurred in 8 patients in the control group and 12 in the patch group (P= .343). Our pilot study supports the view that an SSP tear repair with porcine dermal xenograft augmentation does not benefit patients in terms of reducing the risk of a recurrent tendon defect or improving shoulder function up to 24months after surgical repair. Level III, therapeutic study, retrospective comparative trial.

Predictors of outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair in 155 cases: a propensity score weighted analysis of knotted and knotless self-reinforcing repair techniques at a minimum of 2years.

To evaluate the outcomes of two commonly used transosseous-equivalent (TOE) arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) techniques for full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears (FTST) using a robust multi-predictor model. 155 shoulders in 151 patients (109 men, 42 women; mean age 59±10years) who underwent arthroscopic RCR of FTST, using either a knotted suture bridging (KSB) or a knotless tape bridging (KTB) TOE technique were included. ASES and SF-12 PCS scores assessed at a minimum of 2years postoperatively were modeled using propensity score weighting in a multiple linear regression model. Patients able to return to the study center underwent a follow-up MRI for evaluation of rotator cuff integrity. The outcome data were available for 137 shoulders (88%; n=35/41 KSB; n=102/114 KTB). Seven patients (5.1%) that underwent revision rotator cuff surgery were considered failures. The median postoperative ASES score of the remaining 130 shoulders was 98 at a mean follow-up of 2.9years (range 2.0-5.4years). A higher preoperative baseline outcome score and a longer follow-up had a positive effect, whereas a previous RCR and workers' compensation claims (WCC) had a negative effect on final ASES or SF 12 PCS scores. The repair technique, age, gender and the number of anchors used for the RCR had no significant influence. Fifty-two patients returned for a follow-up MRI at a mean of 4.4years postoperatively. Patients with a KSB RCR were significantly more likely to have an MRI-diagnosed full-thickness rotator cuff re-tear (p<0.05). Excellent outcomes can be achieved at a minimum of 2years following arthroscopic KSB or KTB TOE RCR of FTST. The preoperative baseline outcome score, a prior RCR, WCC and the length of follow-up significantly influenced the outcome scores. The repair technique did not affect the final functional outcomes, but patients with KTB TOE RCR were less likely to have a full-thickness rotator cuff re-tear. Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Transosseous-equivalent repair with and without medial row suture tying: a cadaveric study of infraspinatus tendon strain measurement

BackgroundHow the use of the transosseous-equivalent (TOE) technique effects the stress concentration in repaired rotator cuff tendon is unknown. This study was conducted to determine the strain between the intact rotator cuff tendon and the tendon repaired using the TOE technique with and without medial row suture tying.Materials and methodsStrain of the infraspinatus tendon from 10 fresh-frozen cadavers was measured at the (A) tendon insertion, (B) tendon footprint, (C) tendon of the medial suture level, and (D) musculotendinous junction of the tendon. The strain was measured during 2 cycles of internal and external rotations while applying 4 different loads to the infraspinatus. After the intact tendon was evaluated, an artificially created tear of the infraspinatus was repaired using the TOE technique. Medial row sutures were tied in 5 shoulders (T group) and untied in the rest (UT group). The strains at 4 sites were compared between the intact and the TOE-repaired tendon and between the T and UT groups.ResultsThe strain was significantly reduced at site B in the repaired tendon in the T and UT groups compared with the intact tendon for all loads (P < .05). At site C, the strain increased for all loads in the T group compared with the intact tendon (P < .05).ConclusionThe strain of the tendon over the footprint area was significantly smaller than the intact tendon when repaired with the TOE technique. The strain at the medial suture level was significantly greater when the medial sutures were tied compared with those untied.

A 3D finite element model for geometrical and mechanical comparison of different supraspinatus repair techniques

Contact pressure and contact area are among the most important mechanical factors studied to predict the effectiveness of a rotator cuff repair. The suture configurations can strongly affect these factors but are rarely correlated with each other. For example, there is a significant difference between the single-row technique and the transosseous or transosseous-like approaches in terms of footprint contact area coverage. A finite element model-based approach is presented and applied to account for various parameters (eg, suture pretension, geometry of the repair, effect of the sutures, geometry of the lesion) and to compare the efficacy of different repair techniques in covering the original footprint. The model allows us to evaluate the effect of parameters such as suture configuration and position and suture pretension. The validity of such an approach was assessed in comparing 3 different repair techniques: single row, transosseous equivalent, and double row. Results from the application of the models show that the double-row and transosseous-equivalent techniques lead to progressive increase of the contact area compared with the single-row approach, supporting the conclusion that transosseous-equivalent fixation leads to an increase of the contact area and a better distribution of the pressure coverage. The 3-dimensional finite element model approach allows multiple variables to be assessed singularly, weighing the specific influence. Moreover, the approach presented in this study could be a valid tool to predict and to reproduce different configurations, identifying how to reduce the stress over the tendon and when a repair could be effective or not.

Tratamiento mediante hilera única versus transóseo doble hilera en las roturas del manguito de los rotadores de tamaño pequeño y medio. Estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado

IntroductionThe best technique for arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears is still not clear. Several studies point to an improvement, in biomechanical terms, of repairs in double row. However, few studies have demonstrated clinical superiority of repair in double row, and these have been mainly on large ruptures. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical differences using the Constant score between two arthroscopic techniques for small and medium-sized tears of the supraspinatus, and to assess the costs and benefits of both techniques. Material and methodsProspective, randomised, study involving 114 patients with tears of up to 3cm of the supraspinatus tendon, diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging, with failure of up to three months conservative treatment. Patients were randomised into two different surgical techniques: Classic single row technique with one or two anchors in 5.5mm PEEK, with 3-wire and transosseous-equivalent (TOE) with two anchors 5.5mm PEEK, 3-wire, medial, and two knotless lateral anchors. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon. All patients underwent the same rehabilitation program.Patients were evaluated before and at 12 months after the operation by an independent evaluator and using the Constant score. ResultsResults were obtained on 108 patients, after excluding three post-operative complications unrelated to the surgical technique, and loss of follow up of three other patients. The characteristics of both groups, in terms of demographics, rupture dimension and pre-surgical Constant score were analysed, with no significant differences being found. The mean post-surgical Constant score for the single row group was 79, and the TOE group of 78, not having a statistically significant difference. As regards the difference between the pre and post-surgery scores, the mean difference in the single row group was 50, and in the TOE group it was 55, also without significant statistical difference. In patients with abnormally low results (4 cases), a post-operative MRI was performed, with two cases of re-rupture identified for each technique. ConclusionIn our sample, with the techniques described, no differences in clinical outcome between the two techniques were identified. No differences were observed in the rate of re-rupture between the two techniques. Based on our results, the cost benefit ratio is unfavourable for the TOE technique.