Transoral Group Research Articles

Comparison of postoperative pain between transoral and conventional thyroidectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

The extent of postoperative pain following transoral thyroidectomy is not well-understood and remains a subject of debate. This study aims to analyze and compare postoperative pain levels between patients undergoing transoral and conventional transcervical thyroidectomy. A prospective evaluation on postoperative pain was conducted in 310 patients undergoing conventional thyroidectomy and 194 undergoing transoral thyroidectomy. Pain levels were evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS, ranging from 0 to 10) through preoperative and postoperative questionnaires at specified time points: 1, 3, and 6days, and 1 and 3months following surgery. Propensity score-matched analysis was carried out based on six covariates: sex, age, body mass index, extent of thyroidectomy, tumor size, and central neck dissection. After propensity score matching based on the six covariates, 121 patient pairs were identified from each group. Within this matched cohort, postoperative pain scores significantly worsened 1day after surgery but showed progressive recovery up to 3months post-surgery in both groups. The transoral group exhibited higher postoperative pain scores than the conventional group from day 1 (4.43 ± 2.6 vs. 3.11 ± 2.5, p < 0.001) to day 6 (1.76 ± 1.9 vs. 1.13 ± 1.6, p = 0.016) post-surgery, with no significant difference noted at 1month. Among transoral procedures, pain scores were significantly higher for the endoscopic approach compared to the robotic approach on days 1 (5.52 ± 2.3 vs. 4.29 ± 2.3, p = 0.028) and 3 (3.52 ± 2.5 vs. 2.64 ± 2.0, p = 0.047) post-surgery. Postoperative pain was significantly higher in transoral thyroidectomy compared to conventional thyroidectomy up to 6days post-surgery. Within the transoral group, the robotic procedure resulted in lower pain levels than the endoscopic approach during the early postoperative period.

A New Transoral Vestibulum Single Incision Endoscopic-Assisted Thyroidectomy with Gasless.

We developed a novel method for thyroidectomy using a single-incision oral vestibular approach. To assess its advantages and disadvantages, we compared the perioperative parameters of this approach with those of transoral three-incision thyroidectomy and trans-areolar thyroidectomy. In a study of 136 papillary thyroid carcinoma patients (2016-2018), precise thyroidectomy and neck dissection were conducted. Among them, 52 chose single-incision oral vestibular approach, 33 chose three-incision variant, and 51 underwent trans-areolar thyroidectomy. Perioperative aspects of the transoral single-incision group were compared with those of transoral three-incision group, and transthoracic group. In the cohort, meticulous tumor level VI lymph node dissection was performed, achieving intended resection extent with one case requiring a switch from transoral to transthoracic approach. No nerve palsy occurred in the transoral group. Thyroidectomy duration varied significantly across groups. Transoral single-incision had a shorter duration than transoral three-incision and longer than transthoracic. Minor differences were observed in blood loss and drainage. Perioperative factors like hematoma, infection, hypocalcemia, et al., remained consistent. Notably, no tumor recurrence was observed in this study. This new transoral video-assisted neck surgery (TOVANS) method for thyroidectomy without gas insufflation approach did not increase the surgical complexity compared with the transoral vestibular three-incision thyroidectomy and the trans-areolar thyroidectomy. 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2976-2984, 2024.

Comparison of mid-cheek tumors endoscopically assisted dissection between a single preauricular or transoral incision

Objective: To summarize the preliminary experience of endoscopically assisted mid-cheek benign tumor resection using a single preauricular or transoral incision and to evaluate its indications, advantages, and disadvantages. Methods: Thirty-six patients with benign mid-cheek tumors were prospectively enrolled, including 11 males and 25 females, aged (37.2±15.9) years and ranged from 11 to 65 years old. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: endoscope-assisted tumor dissections through a single preauricular incision (19 cases) or transoral incision (17 cases). Their surgical approaches were introduced, and the tumor long-axis length, incision length, operative time, estimated intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage amount and time, aesthetic satisfaction, perioperative complications, and follow-up were recorded and analyzed. Results: The difference between the tumor long-axis lengths in the preauricular group [(2.2±0.9) cm] and the transoral group [(2.1±0.7) cm] was not statistically significant (t=0.46, P=0.687), and all surgical procedures were completed as planned. There was no significant difference in the incision size (t=1.57, P=0.100) or operative time (t=0.44, P=0.736). Compared with the preauricular group [(30.8±8.7) ml], transoral incision [(23.6±8.9) ml] reduced intraoperative blood loss (t=2.97, P=0.006) and improved aesthetic pleasure (t=3.44, P=0.015). Two cases of earlobe numbness and one case of temporary facial palsy were observed in the preauricular group; two cases of postoperative effusion were noted in the transoral group, and no signs of nerve injury were detected. No tumor recurrence was found during the 1-54-month of follow-up. perioperative complications. Conclusions: Endoscopic-assisted preauricular or transoral incision for dissecting mid-cheek benign tumors provides excellent aesthetic and minimally invasive results, reducing complications and obtaining satisfactory aesthetic results.

Retrospective comparison of endoscopic transoral and bilateral areolar approaches for thyroglossal cyst resection: a single-centre experience.

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical effect of the transoral approach and the bilateral areolar approach (BAA) for endoscopic thyroglossal duct cyst (TGDC) resection. In total, 42 patients who received an endoscopic TGDC resection between January 2019 and May 2022 via a transoral (n = 22) or bilateral areolar (n = 20) approach by a single surgeon were retrospectively enrolled. We collected and compared the following data: patients' demographic data, complication events, operative time, bleeding volume, drainage volume, 6-h postoperative pain scores, length of hospitalisation, resected TGDC size, and cosmetic satisfaction. There were no cases of conversion to a transcervical approach in the two groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, complication, bleeding volume, 6-h postoperative pain scores, and TGDC size (all p > 0.05). However, the operative time and patients' cosmetic satisfaction were higher in the transoral group than in the BAA group (all p < 0.05). In addition, the drainage volume and length of hospitalisation in the transoral group were less than those in the BAA group (all p < 0.05). Both the transoral approach and BAA are safe and reliable; however, the transoral approach is more complex than the BAA and offers better cosmetic satisfaction. Doctors should choose the appropriate surgical procedure based on the patient's condition and preferences.

Comparison of intraoperative neural monitoring between endoscopic transoral and bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy.

The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during endoscopic thyroidectomy has not been fully explored, with limited studies focusing solely on the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and neglecting the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of IONM in two endoscopic thyroidectomy techniques, namely the transoral and bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA). We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy with IONM and compared the outcomes between those who underwent different surgical techniques (transoral or BABA). We recorded the detection method and identification rate of the EBSLN and RLN, along with the amplitude and latency of the evoked potential. We monitored 98 nerves at risk (NAR) from 74 patients (60 and 38 in the transoral and BABA groups, respectively). Almost all EBSLNs were identified using electromyography (EMG) signals and/or cricothyroid muscle twitches, except for one patient in the transoral group who developed EBSLN palsy. Patients in the transoral group were more likely to have the sternothyroid muscle divided (75.0% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001) and had a lower rate of visual recognition of the EBSLN fibers (10.0% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.007) than did those in the BABA group. All RLNs were identified in both groups; however, patients in the BABA group had a relatively higher rate of post-dissection amplitude reduction > 50% (15.8% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.072), and one patient had transient RLN palsy. Both the EBSLN and RLN could be adequately identified and monitored during endoscopic transoral and BABA thyroidectomies using IONM.

Transoral versus transfacial surgical approach to maxillary tumors: evaluation of outcomes and perspectives

Neoplasms of the maxilla have multiple different origins and histology, and often extend towards the infratemporal fossa, orbit, or skull base. Extensive resection may be required, often leading to poor esthetic and functional results. Usually, these lesions are removed via a transfacial approach. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the transoral versus transfacial approach for maxillary tumors. A single-institution retrospective study was conducted on patients with maxillary-midface tumors, treated between January 2009 and December 2019. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach, transfacial or transoral, and the following outcomes were assessed: extent of the resection based on Brown’s classification; postoperative pathology margin assessment; reconstruction technique; esthetic/functional results. A total of 178 patients were included. A satisfactory resection was obtained in both groups, with the transoral cohort achieving a higher rate of clear oncological margins (positive margins: transoral group 3.7% versus transfacial group 6.8%, P = 0.389) and a significantly higher University of Washington Quality of Life score (mean 72.2 versus 67.8, P < 0.001). Even large and invasive tumors can be treated successfully with the transoral approach, avoiding unesthetic facial scars while still providing complete resection of the tumor.

Comparison of Conventional Versus Right Angled Fixation Technique in Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures – A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

The treatment of mandibular angle fractures ranges from observation to closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation to open reduction and internal fixation. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different techniques (transoral, transbuccal, and right-angled fixation technique) for single adaptational monocortical upper border plating in mandibular angle fracture. The study conducted at our center was a prospective randomized study. The study duration was from November 2019 to August 2021. The three groups included in our study were transoral, transbuccal, and transoral approach using the right-angled drill. Patients who required open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fracture were included in the study. Computer-generated randomization method was used to assign the participants among the 3 groups, ie, transoral, transbuccal, or right-angled fixation technique. The primary outcome clinical variables were mouth opening (MO), occlusion stability, scar or laceration, facial nerve weakness, infection, and the radiological variables were gap between the fracture segments and displacement of the fracture segment. The secondary outcome of our study is a comparison of the perioperative complications including plate exposure during the entire fracture healing period. The covariates of the study were age, sex, etiology, and tooth in line of fracture. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, and Pearson χ2 test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 48 patients were included in our study. According to randomization, each group was allotted 16 patients. In the study, 66.7% of the study population were male and 33.3% were female; 75% of the study population were victims of road traffic accidents, and 25% were injured due to assault. The mean and standard deviation for MO at 1month were 31.3±2.9 for the transoral group, 35.8±1.7 for the transbuccal group, and 35.5±1.3 for the right-angled fixation group. On intergroup comparison, statistically significant results were seen at the 1-month postoperative MO clinical parameter. The P value here was 0.02 which was statistically significant. The comparison of the right-angled fixation technique to transoral and transbuccal fixation methods have not been documented. Our study is the first of its kind to compare the right-angled fixation technique to various other approaches. Our study showed that the MO was better postoperatively with the transbuccal approach. The other variables showed no difference among the three techniques.

Comparisons of Outcomes of Chin Implantation Using the Transoral Versus Submental Technique: A Systematic Review

Background: Chin implantation is a commonly performed facial plastic surgery procedure. There are 2 approaches to this procedure: submental and transoral. There is no consensus as to which is the best and safest approach. Objective: The objective of this review is to ascertain the risks and benefits of using an intraoral versus submental approach for chin implantation. Methods: A systematic review of all articles published in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from 1966 to 2020. Results: A total of 1410 articles were reviewed and 38 were chosen for the review based on predetermined selection criteria. Total complication rates in the transoral group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, whereas total complication rates in the submental group ranged from 0% to 15%. No clear difference in the rates of any specific complication was found between the 2 groups. Conclusion: There is no demonstrated difference in complication rates between the 2 approaches to chin implantation. Individual patient assessment and surgeon preference remain the most important determinants of surgical approach.

Outcome of Transbuccal and Transoral Technique in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures

Background: Angle fractures have the highest percentage among mandibular fractures. It has many reasons like thinner cross section area, presence of third molar, muscle forces acting at the angle area and abrupt change of shape from horizontal to vertical rami. Aim: To determine the outcomes of trans-buccal and trans-oral technique in open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Methodology: Total of 194 patients were recruited and divided in two groups. All patients underwent general anesthesia. In trans-oral group incision line was on external oblique ridge, exposing the ridge, the 5 holes mono-cortical plate were twisted and adapted to the ridge contour and fixed with 4 mono-cortical 2mm diameter screws. While in transbuccal approach, the angle region was exposed trans-orally. Statistical analysis: The collected data was analyzed by using SPSS version 25. Chi square was applied with p-value of less than 0.05 as significant. Results: The result showed infection in trans-buccal group was 5.4% and in transoral group was 17.4%. Wound dehiscence in trans-buccal group was 2.2% while in transoral group was 10.9%. Plate or screw loosening in trans-buccal group was 1.1% and transoral group was 7.6%. Mal-union in trans-buccal group was 1.1% and in trans-oral group, it was 7.6%. Conclusion: It was concluded that the trans-buccal is an effective procedure in terms of infection, wound dehiscence, mal-union and plate/screw loosening in comparison to trans-oral approach. Keywords: Trans-buccal, Trans-oral, Infection and Wound Dehiscence.

Comparative study on efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided transoral and transcutaneous core needle biopsy in patients with oral masses

BackgroundUltrasound (US) guided transoral biopsy is a novel and safe procedure for obtaining tissue in patients with oral masses. However, this procedure is less commonly used in comparison to US guided transcutaneous biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of US-guided transoral and transcutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with oral masses.MethodsFrom November 2019 to March 2021, consecutive patients with oral masses were randomly assigned to undergo US-guided transoral CNB (transoral group) and US-guided transcutaneous CNB from a submental approach (transcutaneous group). During the operation, procedure time, intra‑operative blood loss volume, diagnostic performance, rate of complications and pain level were recorded and compared.ResultsThere were 112 patients (62 in the transoral group and 50 in the transcutaneous group) evaluated in this study. The postprocedural complication rate of the transcutaneous group was significantly higher than the transoral group (24% vs. 0%, P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in accuracy (95.2% vs. 88%, P = 0.30), biopsy time (76 ± 12 s vs. 80 ± 13 s, p = 0.09), blood losses (2.6 ± 0.5 mL vs. 2.7 ± 0.4 mL, p = 0.17) and visual analogue score (p = 0.327 and p = 0.444 before and after the sampling procedure) between the two groups.ConclusionUS-guided transoral CNB results in high rates of technical success and lower rates of postprocedural complications.

Use of Propensity Score Matching to Compare Short Outcomes from Transoral and External Surgical Approaches in Patients with Deep-Lobe Parotid Pleomorphic Adenomas

To compare the outcomes of patients who had deep-lobe parotid gland pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) that extended into the parapharyngeal space after surgical treatment, using a transoral approach or an external approach. One hundred and twelve eligible patients, with deep-lobe parotid gland PAs, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The surgical outcomes were compared for patients who received a transoral approach and an external approach, using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The outcome measures were recurrence rate, facial nerve deficit, Frey’s syndrome, and hospitalization time. The median follow-up time was 4.8 years. After PSM, the transoral approach and external approach groups had no statistically significant difference in recurrence (10.3% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.201). The transoral approach group had no facial nerve deficit, but 5 of 29 patients (17.2%) in the external approach group had transient facial nerve paralysis (p = 0.052). The external approach group had a longer hospitalization time than the transoral approach group (5 vs. 4 days, p = 0.0017). The use of a transoral surgical approach to treat patients with deep-lobe parotid gland PAs led to low recurrence, shorter hospitalization times, and good functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Outcome Comparison between Endoscopic Transoral and Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach Thyroidectomy Performed by a Single Surgeon.

The transoral approach and the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) are remote access approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy. Both follow a symmetric design and use CO2 insufflation to maintain the working space. The outcome differences between the techniques are rarely compared in the literature. All patients who underwent endoscopic transoral (n = 72) and BABA (n = 63) thyroidectomy between October 2018 and August 2020 by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The following peri-operative data were collected and compared: operative time, blood loss, postoperative drainage amount, hospital stay, pain score, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and complications. Patients in the transoral group were younger (44.7 vs. 49.3years, p = 0.022) and had smaller tumors (2.4 vs. 2.8cm, p = 0.020) than those in the BABA group. The operative times were significantly longer in the transoral group than in the BABA group (lobectomy, 194.1 vs. 177.0min, p = 0.026; total thyroidectomy, 246.0 vs. 214.3min, p = 0.042). Nevertheless, the time difference became insignificant after completing the initial 20 cases of transoral thyroidectomy. The drainage fluid collected after the surgery was serosanguinous, and a lower drainage volume was observed in the transoral group than that in the BABA group (64.9 vs. 78.5ml, p = 0.017). However, there was no significant difference regarding the blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and lymph nodes retrieved. The rate of postoperative complications, such as hypoparathyroidism and vocal cord palsy was comparable between the two groups. Transoral approach and BABA are comparable with regard to surgical outcomes. Selected patients may choose either technique based on their preferences.

Transoral Versus Transnasal Approaches in Office-Based Laryngeal Biopsy: A Cohort-Selection Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Accuracy Study

The aim of this study is to explore the accuracy of two different approaches: transoral versus transnasal office-based laryngeal biopsy. Cohort-selection cross-sectional study. Outpatient clinic of Phoniatrics in El Demerdash Hospital, faculty of medicine, Ain Sham University, Cairo, Egypt). The study included all patients aged 18 years or more with suspicious lesions of the larynx or the oropharynx who are eligible for biopsy who came to the outpatient clinic due to different reasons during the period of March 2017 and March 2020. Patients with suspicious lesions were referred for office-based-based biopsy-either transnasal biopsy or transoral biopsy. All patients were referred for subsequent direct laryngoscopy for definitive diagnosis. The overall sample was 60 cases with 30 in each group. The majority of both groups were smokers. The most frequent cause of referral for biopsy was suspicious laryngeal mass. The number of biopsies obtained was significantly higher in the transoral group. Both approaches were tolerated by all patients with few limited aspiration or epistaxis. The sensitivity of the transoral approach was compared with that of direct laryngoscopy and was 95.8% with a specificity of 83.3%. The sensitivity of the transnasal approach was compared with that of direct laryngoscopy and was 26.3%; the specificity was 90.9%. The transoral approach to obtaining a biopsy from the upper aero-digestive tract has better diagnostic accuracy than the transnasal approach when combined with transnasal visualization and transcricothyroid anesthesia.

Can Voice Pitch Be Preserved in Patients after Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach?

Introduction: Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has become increasingly popular. Several reports have emphasized the safety and efficacy of this new approach. However, there is no report on functional voice outcomes, including voice pitch change after TOETVA. Methods: The functional voice outcomes of patients undergoing TOETVA were compared with those of patients undergoing conventional thyroidectomy. A total of 82 consecutive patients were included in the study: 44 underwent thyroid lobectomy via TOETVA (transoral group) and 38 underwent thyroid lobectomy via the classic cervical approach (open group). Thyroidectomy-related voice questionnaire (TVQ), perceptual voice analysis, fiberoptic laryngoscopic and videolaryngostroboscopic examinations, and acoustic analysis were carried out before and one month after surgery. The changes in these values after surgery and the differences between the transoral and open groups were analyzed. Results: We found no significant postoperative change in voice workups in either group. The mean high pitch decreased (from 367.91 ± 120.98 to 325.80 ± 100.86 Hz, p = 0.069) in the transoral group, but statistical significance was not attained. Clinically significant changes in pitch (postoperative change in speaking fundamental frequency, ΔSFF ≥ 12) after surgery were evident in seven (15.91%) patients in the transoral group and eight (21.05%) patients in the open group without significant difference (p = 0.579). Conclusions: This is the first study to assess functional voice outcomes (including pitch) after TOETVA compared with conventional open surgery. TOETVA was associated with good voice outcomes without any significant drop in pitch.

Safety and efficacy of transoral robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy: The first 100 cases.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transoral robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy. We analyzed and compared the first 100 cases of transoral robotic (71 cases) and endoscopic (29 cases) thyroidectomy with 207 cases of conventional transcervical thyroidectomy. Transoral thyroidectomy was completed successfully in all patients, except for three who were converted to the robotic facelift or transcervical approach. The mean operative time of the transoral procedure was significantly longer than that of the conventional procedure. Perioperative complications such as hypoparathyroidism, vocal cord palsy, hematoma, and seroma did not differ between the two groups. However, there were some unusual complications such as CO2 embolism, surgical site infection, skin trauma, burn, and ecchymosis in transoral thyroidectomy. Postoperative cosmesis was significantly better in the transoral group. Transoral robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy is feasible and comparable to conventional transcervical thyroidectomy in highly selected patients.

The safety of esophagojejunostomy via a transorally inserted-anvil method vs extracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler during total gastrectomy for Siewert type 2 adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BackgroundIntracorporeal esophagojejunostomy via a transorally inserted-anvil method during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for upper gastric cancer has been demonstrated to be feasible, but the use of this assessment exclusively for Siewert type 2 adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has not been reported.MethodsA total of 428 consecutive gastric-cancer patients who underwent LTG in Nanfang Hospital from January 2008 to December 2016 were reviewed. Among these patients, 98 were classified as Siewert type 2 AEG. The patients underwent intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy through either a transorally inserted-anvil method (n = 27) or extracorporeal anastomosis usinga circular stapler (n = 71). After generating propensity scores with covariates that were associated with developing anastomotic leakage, 26 patients who underwent esophagojejunostomy via the transorally inserted-anvil method (transoral group) were 1:1 matched with 26 patients who underwent the procedure via extracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler (extracorporeal group). The safety after 30 days post-operatively was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe transoral group and extracorporeal group were balanced regarding the baseline variables. The operative time, reconstruction duration, number of dissected lymph nodes, length of the proximal resection margins, estimated blood loss, intra-operative complication rate, and post-operative recovery course were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean anvil-insertion completion time (9.7 ± 3.0 vs 13.4 ± 2.0 minutes, P < 0.001) and the median incision length (5.5 vs 7.0 cm, P < 0.001) in the transoral group were shorter than those in the extracorporeal group. The incidence of post-operative complications (26.9% vs 23.1%, P = 0.749) and the classification of complication severity (P = 0.939) were similar between the two groups.ConclusionsIntracorporeal esophagojejunostomy through a transorally inserted-anvil method may be a potentially safe approach to simplify and optimize the procedure during LTG for Siewert type 2 AEG.

Endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision: Multicenter prospective observational study.

Transoral surgery is gaining favor because it has the advantage of leaving no scar after surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision. Multicenter, prospective, observational study. This study was designed as a 7-year, prospective, multicenter evaluation of endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision. Clinical outcomes and complications related to the procedures were evaluated in patients. Twenty patients underwent endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excisions, and 22 patients underwent conventional parotidectomy approach excisions. There was no significant difference with respect to overall demographic characteristics between the groups. However, the operation times were shorter in the transoral approach group (P = 0.001), and cosmetic satisfaction was much better in the transoral group (P < 0.001). Endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision is a potentially safe and effective procedure with excellent outcomes. 2 Laryngoscope, 130:1218-1226, 2020.

Transoral Dermoid Cyst Excision: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

Transoral surgery is becoming a preferred technique because it does not leave any scar after surgery. However, transoral surgery for a dermoid cyst of the oral cavity is not standardized yet, due to the anatomic complexity of this region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a transoral dermoid cyst excision. Multicenter prospective observational study. University hospital. This study was designed as a 4-year prospective multicenter evaluation of dermoid cyst excisions within the floor of mouth. Clinical outcomes and complications related to procedures were evaluated among patients. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the procedure, and the secondary outcome was cosmetic satisfaction of each procedure. Twenty-one patients underwent transoral dermoid cyst excisions, and 22 underwent transcervical excisions. In the transoral surgery group, the mean size of the dermoid cyst was 5.35 cm (95% CI, 4.79-5.91), and in the transcervical surgery group, it was 6.19 cm (95% CI, 5.67-6.71). There was no significant differences with respect to overall demographic characteristics between the groups. However, the duration of the operation was shorter with the transoral group than with the transcervical group ( P = .001), and cosmetic satisfaction was much better in the transoral group ( P < .001). Transoral dermoid cyst excision is a potentially safe and effective method that can lead to easy and quick removal of an oral cavity dermoid cyst, with excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Complications and Reoperations in Mandibular Angle Fractures.

Mandible angle fractures can be repaired in a variety of ways, with no consensus on the outcomes of complications and reoperation rates. To analyze patient, injury, and surgical factors, including approach to the angle and plating technique, associated with postoperative complications, as well as the rate of reoperation with regard to mandible angle fractures. Retrospective cohort study analyzing the surgical outcomes of patients with mandible angle fractures between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, who underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, had 3 or less mandible fractures with 1 involving the mandibular angle, and had adequate follow-up data. Patients with comminuted angle fractures, bilateral angle fractures, and multiple surgical approaches were excluded. A total of 135 patients were included in the study. All procedures were conducted at a single, large academic hospital located in an urban setting. Major complications and reoperation rates. Major complications included in this study were nonunion, malunion, severe malocclusion, severe infection, and exposed hardware. Of 135 patients 113 (83.7%) were men; median age was 29 years (range, 18-82 years). Eighty-seven patients (64.4%) underwent the transcervical approach and 48 patients (35.6%) received the transoral approach. Fifteen (17.2%) patients in the transcervical group and 9 (18.8%) patients in the transoral group experienced major complications (difference, 1%; 95% CI, -8% to 10%). Thirteen (14.9%) patients in the transcervical group and 8 (16.7%) patients in the transoral group underwent reoperations (difference, 2%; 95% CI, -13% to 17%). Active smoking had a significant effect on the rate of major complications (odds ratio, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.07 to 15.34; P = .04). During repair of noncomminuted mandibular angle fractures, both of the commonly used approaches-transcervical and transoral-can be used during treatment with equal rates of complication and risk of reoperation. For a patient undergoing surgery for mandibular angle fracture, smoking status is more likely to predict surgical outcomes rather than how the surgeon chooses to approach and fixate the fracture. 3.

Biomechanical comparison of transoral and transbuccal lateral cortical plate fixation for the management of mandibular angle fractures

The purpose of this experimental study was to compare the biomechanical behaviors of two different types of osteosynthesis that are used in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Twenty synthetic polyurethane human mandible replicas, with medullar and cortical portions, were used in this study. These polyurethane hemimandibles were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10). The transbuccal group (Group A) was fixed with 7 mm long self-tapping 2.0 mm titanium screws at 85° to the reference line and the transoral group (Group B) was fixed with the same screws at 15° to the reference line. All testings were performed on a servo-hydraulic testing machine. The data were transmitted directly from the load cell to a computer, which showed the emergent results of the material characteristics under resisted forces as a graphic containing force and displacement. The peak point loading and displacement for each subject were measured. The comparison between the groups was analyzed with an independent-samples t-test, and P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. The results show that there were no significant differences between the groups for the peak loads and displacement values at the peak loads. The results of this experimental study demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the transbuccal and transoral methods in terms of fixation stability. In other words, the screw position and angle seemed to no have influence on the fixation stability in single miniplate treatments of a mandibular angle fracture.