Translaminar Facet Screw Research Articles

Innovative 3D Navigation Module for Precise Unilateral Pedicle Screw Combined with Contralateral Translaminar Facet Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

The incidence of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine has increased in recent years. Unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation offers the advantages of less trauma, better stability, and fewer complications. However, the surgical difficulty and suboptimal pinning accuracy of translaminar facet screw placement in clinical practice limit its use. Therefore, in this study, we designed a novel suspended 3D-printed navigation module to facilitate fast and accurate intraoperative screw placement. The aim of this study is to investigate the digital design, precise implementation, and evaluation methods for placing unilateral pedicle screws in the lumbar spine combined with translaminar facet screw placement using a new suspended 3D navigation module. This retrospective study included 46 patients with single-level lumbar lesions who underwent spine surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University between June 2022 and December 2023. The suspended navigation module was designed digitally. Preoperative screw placement was simulated using 3D printed models, followed by an intraoperative accurate screw placement facilitated by the navigation module and a postoperative evaluation of the accuracy of screw placement. The absolute difference in three-dimensional coordinates of the inlet and outlet points of the preoperative design and the postoperative screw-nail channel served as the precision index. In a study involving 46 patients, surgery was successful with 92 pedicle screws and 46 translaminar facet screws placed without any penetration of the cortex. The difference in coordinates before and after screw insertion was minimal, with entry points varying between 1.21 to 1.36 mm and exit points between 1.97 to 2.46 mm. When screw accuracy met certain thresholds, there was no significant difference between preoperative design and postoperative coordinates, indicating precise replication of the surgical plan. The new suspended 3D navigation module enables the precise placement of unilateral pedicle screws in the lumbar spine combined with translaminar pedicle screws for precise surgery.

Oblique lateral interbody fusion with internal fixations in the treatment for cross-segment degenerative lumbar spine disease (L2-3 and L4-5) finite element analysis

Multi-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, including intersegmental disc degeneration, is found in clinical practice. Controversy still exists regarding the treatment for cross-segment degeneration. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) with several internal fixations was used to treat cross-segment lumbar degenerative disease. A whole lumbar spine model was extracted from CT images of the whole lumbar spine of patients with lumbar degeneration. The L2-3 and L4-5 intervertebral spaces were fused with OLIF using modeling software, the Pedicle screws were performed on L2-3 and L4-5, and different internal fixations were performed on L3-4 in Finite Element (FE) software. Among the six 10 Nm moments of different directions, the L3-4 no surgery (NS) group had the relatively largest Range of Motion (ROM) in the whole lumbar spine, while the L2-5 Long segmental fixation (LSF)group had the smallest ROM and the other groups had similar ROM. The ROM in the L1-2 and L5-S1 was relatively close in the six group models, and the articular cartilage stress and disc stress on the L1-2 and L5-S1 were relatively close. In contrast, the L3-4 ROM differed relatively greatly, with the LSF ROM the smallest and the NS ROM the largest, and the L3-4 Coflex (Coflex) group more active than the L3-4 Bacfuse (Bacfuse) group and the L3-4 translaminar facet screw fixation (TFSF) group. The stress on the articular cartilage and disc at L3-4 was relatively greater in the NS disc and articular cartilage, and greater in the Coflex group than in the Bacfuse and TFSF groups, with the greatest stress on the internal fixation in the TFSF group, followed by the Coflex group, and relatively similar stress in the Bacfuse, LSF, and NS groups. In the TFSF group, the stress on the internal fixation was greater than the yield strength among different directional moments of 10 Nm, which means it is unsuitable to be an internal fixation. The LSF group had the greatest overall ROM, which may lead to postoperative low back discomfort. The NS group has the greatest overall ROM, but its increased stress on the L3-4 disc and articular cartilage may lead to accelerated degeneration of the L3-4 disc and articular cartilage. The Coflex and Bacfuse groups had a reduced L3-4 ROM but a greater stress on disc compared to the LSF group, which may lead to disc degeneration in the long term. However, their stress on the articular cartilage was relatively low. Coflex and Bacfuse can still be considered better surgical options.

Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Purpose To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45° cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. Results The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). Conclusion Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate.

Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with different internal fixations for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a finite element analysis

BackgroundLittle is known about the biomechanical performance of different internal fixations in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Here, finite element (FE) analysis was used to describe the biomechanics of various internal fixations and compare and explore the stability of each fixation.MethodsCT scans of a patient with lumbar degenerative disease were performed, and the l3-S1 model was constructed using relevant software. The other five FE models were constructed by simulating the model operation and adding different related implants, including (1) an intact model, (2) a stand-alone (SA) model with no instrument, (3) a unilateral pedicle screw model (UPS), (4) a unilateral pedicle screw contralateral translaminar facet screw model (UPS-CTFS), (5) a bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) model, and (6) a cortical bone trajectory screw model (CBT). Various motion loads were set by FE software to simulate lumbar vertebral activity. The software was also used to extract the range of motion (ROM) of the surgical segment, CAGE and fixation stress in the different models.ResultsThe SA group had the greatest ROM and CAGE stress. The ROM of the BPS and UPS-CTFS was not significantly different among motion loadings. Compared with the other three models, the BPS model had lower internal fixation stress among loading conditions, and the CBT screw internal fixation had the highest stress among loads.ConclusionsThe BPS model provided the best biomechanical stability for OLIF. The SA model was relatively less stable. The UPS-CTFS group had reduced ROM in the fusion segments, but the stresses on the internal fixation and CAGE were relatively higher in the than in the BPS group; the CBT group had a lower flexion and extension ROM and higher rotation and lateral flexion ROM than the BPS group. The stability of the CBT group was poorer than that of the BPS and LPS-CTFS groups. The CAGE and internal fixation stress was greater in the CBT group.

Evaluation of Trans-laminar Facet Screw for Lumbar Spine Fixation and Fusion: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Translaminar facet screws are an excellent solution for stabilization of the vertebral motion. It is simple, does not require any specialized equipment, and has the advantages of being a procedure of lesser magnitude, lesser operative time and few complication rate. Recently there is growing interest in this technique to augment the anterior lumbar fusions to achieve global fusion less invasively. Aim of the Work to evaluate the role of translaminar facet screw in lumber fixation and fusion inclusion different techniques of translaminar facet screw fixation, its advantages and disadvantages. Methodology: This systematic review included a discussion of all available studies meeting the eligible criteria including: well conducted descriptive studies, cohort, articles, accepted manuscripts, clinical trials, analytic studies and the literature of reviews, technical notes. Results The small volume of the metal in comparison with pedicle screw constructs provides faster patient recovery and reduce the rate of infection and also provide an adequate area for placement of bone grafts. The low cost of the implants is an added advantage in view of the rising costs of health care. Conclusion Translaminar facet screw fixation is feasible, cheaper and effective in lumbar fixation. The technique is not demanding as transpedicular screw with easier learning curve.

Channel-assisted fixation and interbody fusion in treating recurrent lumbar disc herniation by muscle-splitting approach

To explore the clinical value and safety of unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion by muscle-splitting approach treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. The clinical data of 51 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation treated from June 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 19 females, aged 34 to 64 years with an average of (51.11± 7.28) years. Lesions invoved L4,5 in 38 cases and L5S1 in 13 cases. All patients had a history of lower back pain and radiation pain of lower limbs(3 bilateral and 48 unilateral)and underwent unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion, among which 24 patients were treated through median incision approach (median incision group);other 27 patients were treated through muscle-splitting approach with channel-assisted exposure(muscle-splitting approach group). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage and incision length of the two groups were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to score the pain of lumbar incision at 72 h after operation, and JOA low back pain scoring system was used to evaluate the lumbar function preoperatively and at final follow-up. Imaging data were analyzed, including the changes in the height of intervertebral space of diseased segment before operation, 3 to 5 days after operation, and at final follow-up;Cobb angle changes in the coronal and sagittal planes of lumbar spine preoperatively and at final follow-up;multifidus area and multifidus fatty tissue deposition grade before and 12 months after operation; postoperative pedicle screw and laminar process screw position and intervertebral fusion condition. The complications of the two groups were compared. There was no statistical difference in operation time between two groups (P>0.05). Muscle-splitting approach group was better than median incision group in light of incision length, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume (P<0.05). VAS score of lumbar incision pain at 72 h after operation was 1.61±0.54 in median incision group and 0.76±0.28 in muscle-splitting approach group(P<0.05). All patients were followed up for 12 to 84 (43.50±15.84) months. At final follow-up, the JOA scores of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P<0.05). The rate of pedicle screw malposition was 6.25%(3/48) in medianincision group and 9.26%(5/54) in muscle-splitting approach group, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). Rate of translaminar facet screw malposition in median incision group (12.50%) was significant less than the muscle-splitting approach group (18.52%)(P< 0.05). The height of the intervertebral space of the two groups was significantly restored 3 to 5 days after operation (P<0.05), and there was also a significant loss of height at final follow-up (P<0.05). At final follow-up, the balance of lumbar coronal plane and sagittal plane in two groups were improved very well (P<0.05). The comparison of the area and grade of the multifidus muscle in two groups 12 months after operation showed that obvious damage to the multifidus muscle were present in the median incision, while the multifidus muscle was less damaged by muscle-splitting approach (P<0.05). The fusion rate was 91.7%(22/24) in the median incision group and 92.6%(25/27) in muscle-splitting approach group(P>0.05). In median incision group, there were 1 case of intraoperative pedicle entry point fracture, 1 case of intraoperative dural tear and 1 case of postoperative nerve root injury;in muscle-splitting approach group, there were 1 case of intraoperative pedicle entry point fracture, 2 cases of intraoperative dural tear, 1 case of postoperative nerve root injury, 2 cases of incision epidermal necrosis and 1 case of poor incision healing. Nerve root injuries in the two groups were caused by incorrect positions of pedicle screws, the screws were immediately adjusted upon discovery. The nerve root symptoms were completely recovered 3 and 6 months after surgery. No incision infection was occurred in two groups. During the follow-up, no pedicle screw and laminar facet screw were loosened, displaced, broken, or intervertebral fusion cage moved forward and backward. The complication rate of 25.93% in muscle-splitting approach group was higher than 12.50% in the median incision group (P<0.05). Muscle-splitting approach is feasible for thetreatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation with pedicle screw fixation combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion. Compared with the median incision approach, the muscle-splitting approach has the advantages of small incision, less trauma, less bleeding, rapid recovery. Also it can protect multifidus and do not increase the incidence of serious complications. Thus, it can be used as a choice for fixation and fusion of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Trajectory of Lumbar Translaminar Facet Screw Under Navigation: A Cadaveric Study.

Study Design:Anatomic cadaver study.Objective:Translaminar facet screw fixation supplements unilateral pedicle screw-rod fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Various screw diameters, lengths, trajectories, and insertion points are used; however, they do not represent true screw trajectory. We aimed to evaluate lumbar laminar anatomy and suggest a safe and effective insertion point and trajectory during lumbar-translaminar facet screw fixation in an anatomic cadaver study.Methods:O-arm navigation simulating the true translaminar facet screw trajectory was used to evaluate L1-S1 in cadaveric spines. The inner and outer diameters, length, and trajectory of the screw pathway were measured along the trajectory from the spinous process base through the contralateral lamina, crossing the facet joint to the transverse process base using 2 starting points: cephalad one-third (1/3SL) and one-half (1/2SL) of the spinolaminar junction.Results:Using the 1/2SL starting point, the outer and inner lamina diameters did not differ significantly from L1-L5 (7.47 ± 1.38 to 6.7 ± 1.84 mm and 4.73 ± 1.04 to 3.86 ± 1.46 mm, respectively). Screw length (36.16 ± 4.02 to 49.29 ± 10.07 mm) and lateral angle increased (50.28° ± 8.78° to 60.77° ± 8.88°), but caudal angle decreased (16.19° ± 9.01° to 1.13° ± 11.31°). Lamina diameter and screw length did not differ with different starting points. L2-L3 caudal angles were lower in the 1/2SL starting point.Conclusion:A 36- to 50-mm translaminar facet screw—with 5.0-mm diameter for L1-L2 and 4.5-mm diameter for L3-L5—can be inserted at the middle of the spinolamina, especially during minimally invasive TLIF, with a 50° to 60° lateral angle relative to the spinous process, and a caudal angle of 16° to 1° relative to the spinolamina from L1-L5.

Stability Evaluation of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: A Finite Element Analysis Based on Three-Dimensional Scanning Models

Little is known about the biomechanical performance of various fixation constructs after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). This study aimed to explore the stability of various fixation options for OLIF by using finite element analysis based on three-dimensional scanning models. Six validated finite element models of the L3-L5 segment were reconstructed via computed tomography images, including (1) intact model, (2) stand-alone model with no instrument, (3) lateral rod-screw model, (4) lateral rod-screw plus contralateral translaminar facet screw (LRS-CTLFS) model, (5) unilateral pedicle screw model, and (6) bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) model. Models of the OLIF cage and pedicle screw were created with three-dimensional scanning to improve the accuracy of finite element analysis. Range of motion, stress of the cage, and stress of fixation were evaluated in the different models. Range of motion increased from least to greatest as follows: BPS, LRS-CTLFS, unilateral pedicle screw, lateral rod-screw, stand-alone. Differences in range of motion between BPS and LRS-CTLFS were not significant for all loading cases. Compared with the other 3 models, the stress of the cage was found to be lower in BPS and LRS-CTLFS under all loading conditions, especially in BPS. Stress exerted on the fixation was the greatest in LRS-CTLFS, and the stress experienced by the translaminar facet screw was concentrated in part of the facet joint. The BPS model provided the best biomechanical stability for OLIF; the stand-alone model could not provide sufficient stability. The LRS-CTLFS procedure increases the approximate stability and reduces stress at the cage-endplate interface; however, it causes an increase in screw stress.

Anatomic study of the lumbar lamina for safe and effective placement of lumbar translaminar facet screws.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the anatomic characteristics of the lumbar lamina and suggest a safe and effective strategy for setting lumbar translaminar facet screws.MethodsThe width and length of the lumbar lamina, screw path, lateral angle of the lamina, and maximum and minimum caudal angles of the lamina from L3 to L5 were measured with Mimics software using 32 patients’ computed tomographic data.ResultsThe optimal screw entry point was located at the median of the spinous process base or slightly lower. The ideal screw trajectory was from the entry point to the base of the transverse process and across the center of the facet joint. A length of 35 to 45 mm was suitable for L3 to L4 in most cases, and a length of 45 to 50 mm was safe for L5 in most cases. The screw should be inserted at an angle of 49.4° to 59.29° laterally and 43.68° to 57.58° caudally at L3 to L5. For the ideal caudal angle, error of <3° was considered safe.ConclusionThe optimal entry point, ideal screw trajectory, ideal screw-setting angles, and safest range of the angle and length of the lumbar lamina were identified in this anatomical study.

A Comparison Study of Three Posterior Fixation Strategies in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Lumbar for the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases

Background:There are various posterior fixations utilized with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Previous studies have focused on the comparison of two fixation techniques.Materials and Methods:Sixty five patients with single-level lumbar disease were included in this retrospective study. Group A was treated by TLIF with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS), Group B treated by TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw (UPS), and Group C treated by TLIF with UPS plus contralateral translaminar facet screw (UPSFS). The operative time, blood loss, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA), and visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded. Radiographic examination was used to assess fusion rates and incidence of screw failure.Results:The blood loss and operative times were 188.69 ± 37.69 ml and 132.96.5 ± 8.69 min in BPS group, 117.27 ± 27.11 ml and 99.32 ± 12.94 min in UPS group, and 121.50 ± 22.54 ml and 112.55 ± 9.42 min in UPSFS group; UPS and UPSFS were better than BPS (P < 0.05). The mean followup time was 38.2 months. Fusion rates were – BPS group: 95.6%, UPS group: 90%, UPSFS: 95% (P > 0.05). Screw and/or rod failures were found in three groups (BPS group: 1, UPS group: 2 and UPSFS: 1, P > 0.05). The average postoperative VAS, ODI, and JOA scores of BPS, UPS, and UPSFS were improved significantly in each group compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences between any two groups at each followup time point (P > 0.05).Conclusion:UPSFS with TLIF is a viable treatment option that provides satisfactory clinical results; the clinical outcome and the complication rate were comparable to BPS. In addition, the invasive of UPSFS cases was comparable to UPS and better than BPS cases. For UPS, it could be used in suitable patients.

Translaminar facet joint screw insertion with a rapid prototyping guide template: a cadaver study

It is technically demanding and requires rich experience to insert the translaminar facet screw(TFS) via the paramedian mini-incision approach. It seems that it is easy to place the TFS using computer-assisted design and rapid prototyping(RP) techniques. However, the accuracy and safety of these techniques is still unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy and safety of translaminar facet screw placement in multilevel unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a rapid prototyping drill guide template system. A patient-matched rapid prototyping translaminar facet screw guide was examined in fourteen cadaveric lumbar spine specimens. A three-dimensional (3D) preoperative screw trajectory was constructed using spinal computed tomography scans, from which individualized guides were developed for the placement of translaminar facet screws. Following bone tunnel establishment, the 3D positioning of the entry point and trajectory of the screws was compared to the preoperative plan as found in the Mimics software.Among 60 trajectories eligible for assessment, no cases of clinically significant laminar perforation were found. The mean deviation between the planned and the actual starting points on spinous process was 1.22 mm. The mean tail and submergence angle deviation was found to be 0.68°and 1.46°, respectively. Among all the deviations, none were found to have any statistical significance. These results indicate that translaminar facet screw placement using the guide system is both accurate and safe.

Short-term effects of combined pedicle/facet screw fixation plus interbody fusion through the channel-assisted muscle-splitting approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases in the elderly

Objective To examine the feasibility and early effects of unilateral pedicle screw fixation in combination with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation plus interbody fusion through the channel-assisted muscle-splitting approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases in elderly patients. Methods A total of 82 elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases received treatment between January 2015 and June 2016.Of these patients, 25 had lumbar spinal stenosis, 42 had degenerative lumbar instability, 13 had giant lumbar disc herniation, and two had recurrent lumbar disc herniation; There were 69 cases of single segment and 13 cases of double segment lesions.Perioperative evaluation, imaging evaluation, and clinical evaluation were performed, and surgical complications were analyzed. Results The average length of incision was (2.6±0.4) cm in cases of single segment lesions and (4.4±0.5) cm in cases of two segment lesions.The mean operation time was (98.3±19.6) minutes and peri-operation blood loss was (232.2±25.8) ml.The post-operation height of the intervertebral disc space significantly increased at the last follow-up(P<0.05); the height of the intervertebral disc space was restored and well maintained with internal fixation showing no loosening, breakage or Cage shift.The post-operation lumbar coronal Cobb angle decreased(P<0.05)while the sagittal Cobb angle increased(P<0.05)at the last follow-up.There was no significant difference in the area and grade of the multifidus muscle on MRI 12 months after operation.Seventy-two patients were followed up for 12-18 months(mean=16.8 months), and there were 67 cases of intervertebral fusion(93.1%). The last follow-up showed a Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score of (25.8±1.7), which was significantly higher than the pre-operation score(10.6±1.3), with an excellence rate of 88.9%.The Oswestry Disability Index score was significantly reduced, from (50.9±21.6) at pre-operation to (9.6±4.8) at the last follow-up.There were 78 patients with primary wound healing, three cases of superficial wound necrosis, one case of dural tear, and one case of nerve root injury.No cardiovascular or cerebrovascular incident was observed during or after operation. Conclusions Combined pedicle/facet screw fixation plus interbody fusion through the channel-assisted muscle-splitting approach shows satisfactory short-term effects when used for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases in the elderly and possesses advantages such as minimal invasiveness, limited bleeding, quick recovery, high fusion rates and significantly improved clinical outcomes.However, further clinical studies are required to assess its medium-and long-term efficacy. Key words: Spinal fusion; Surgical procedures minimally invasive; Arthritis, degenerative

Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results

BackgroundConventional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw has been performed for many years with good results. The outcomes of minimally invasive TLIF (MIS TLIF) are similar to the good outcomes of open TLIF, with the additional benefits of reducing iatrogenic injury, shortening hospital stays, and reducing the recovery duration. Instead of using small cuts on both sides, we performed MIS TLIF through a single cut using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw. The operative feasibility, efficacy safety, and benefits of single-level MIS TLIF of such techniques require further clarification.MethodsA total of 60 patients with various single-segment lower lumbar vertebral diseases were treated in our department from January 2010 to March 2013. All the patients were initially performed single-level MIS TLIF using a hybrid construction of unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw. Patient demographics and operative data were collected. The clinical outcomes were assessed before surgery and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiologic assessment of the lumbar spine with static and dynamic plain radiographs was performed 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The fusion rates were assessed by an independent radiologist 2 years after surgery according to the Bridwell interbody fusion grading system.ResultsNo patients experienced significant postoperative complications. Excepting two cases, 58 cases were followed up for 24–38 months, averaged 29.9 ± 4.1 months. The patients’ average age was 46.6 ± 11.5 years, operative time 109.7 ± 17.8 min, intraoperative blood loss 67.3 ± 29.7 ml, length of incision 29.0 ± 3.2 mm, fluoroscopy time 31.1 ± 7.2 s, time to ambulation 20.3 ± 7.0 h, length of hospital stay 5.1 ± 1.1 days, and length of the translaminar facet screw 51.7 ± 3.4 mm. Screw position results: type I, 54 cases with 54 segments; type II, four cases with four segments. There were two (3.4%) translaminar facet screw failures, which were intraoperatively converted to a bilateral pedicle screw fixation procedure and excluded from the research. The postoperative images showed good positioning of the hybrid internal fixation, and all of the translaminar facet screws penetrated the facet joint. Two (3.6%) translaminar facet screws penetrated the lateral lamina and two (3.6%) translaminar facet screws penetrated the medial lamina without any serious neural complications. During the follow-up, there was no screw loosening or pedicle fracture observed. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores (P < 0.05), and the symptoms disappeared gradually. Fifty-one patients (87.9%) achieved grade I fusion radiographically at the final follow-up.ConclusionsMIS TLIF using a hybrid construction of unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw is safe and effective in the treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease, and it can be used as an optimal choice for fixation and fusion of some single-segment lower lumbar vertebral diseases.

A 3D navigation template for guiding a unilateral lumbar pedicle screw with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation: a study protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trials

IntroductionThe incidence of lumbar disc degeneration disease has increased in recent years. Lumbar interbody fusion using two unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw fixation has advantages of minimal...

Case control study on two different surgical approaches combined fixation with lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single segmental lumbar vertebra diseases

To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of two different surgical approaches combined fixation with lumbar interbody fusion in treating single segmental lumbar vertebra diseases. The clinical data of 86 patients with single segmental lumbar vertebra diseases treated from June 2011 to June 2013 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 33 males and 53 females, aged from 28 to 76 years old with an average of 53.0 years. Among them, there were 39 cases of lumbar disc degeneration, 22 cases of lumbar disc herniation complicated with spinal canal stenosis, 9 cases of huge lumbar disc herniation and 16 cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding degree I ). Lesion sites contained L3, 4 in 5 cases, L4, 5 in 70 cases and L5S1 in 11 cases. All the patients were treated with internal fixation and lumbar interbody fusion with 45 cases by midline incision approach (median incision group) and the other 41 cases by channel-assisted by muscle-splitting approach(channel group). Incision length, operation time, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage were recorded in two groups. Visual analogue scale(VAS) was used to assess lumbar incision pain 72 h after operation. Depended on imaging results to compare the changes of the disc space height in lesion in preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up, the coronal and sagittal Cobb angle in preoperative and final follow-up, the area of multifidus and the degree of multifidus fat deposition before and after operation between two groups. Loosening or fragmentation of internal fixation, displacement of intervertebral cage and interbody fusion were observed in each group. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used to evaluate the function before operation and at the final follow-up. The channel group was superior to the median incision group in incision length and postoperative drainage while the median incision group was less than the channel group in the operation time and intraoperative bleeding. The average VAS score of lumbar incision 72 h after operation was 1.50 points in median incision group and 0.97 points in channel group, and there was significant difference between two groups(P<0.05). No incision infection was found, but there were 4 cases of incisional epidermal necrosis, 1 case of incision healed badness, and 3 cases of nerve injury in channel group. The incidence of cacothesis of pedicle screw were 5.0% and 3.6% in median incision group and channel group respectively, and there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). The incidence of cacothesis of translaminar facet screw were 6.6% and 12.2% in median incision group and channel group respectively, and there was significant difference between two groups(P<0.05). All the patients were followed up for 12 to 36 months with a mean of 22.8 months. The changes of disc space height had statistical difference between preoperative and postoperative(P<0.05) in all patients, but there was no significant difference between postoperative and final follow-up(P>0.05), however, there was no significant difference 3 days after operation and final follow-up between two groups(P>0.05). At final follow-up, coronal and sagittal Cobb angle were obviously improved in all patients(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). One year after operation, the area of multifidus in median incision group was (789.00±143.15) mm² less than preoperative(1 066.00±173.55) mm² (P<0.05), and in channel group, was(992.00±156.75) mm² at 1 year after operation and(1 063.00±172.13) mm² preoperatively, there was no significant difference between them(P>0.05), however, there was significant difference one year after operation between two groups (P<0.05) . About the degree of multifidus fat deposition, there was significant difference between one year after operation and preoperation in median incision group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between one year after operation and preoperation in channel group (P>0.05), and there was significant difference at one year after operation between two groups(P<0.05). During the follow-up period, neither pedicle screw and/or translaminar facet screw loosening, displacement or fragmentation nor displacement of intervertebral cage were found. The lumbar interbody fusion rate was 95.6% in median incision group and was 95.1% in channel group, and there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). No obvious adjacent segmental degeneration was observed in fixed position. JOA score in median incision group was significantly increased from 8-16 points (average: 12.77±2.56) preoperative to 21-29 points (average: 25.20±2.43) at final follow-up(P<0.05); and in channel group was significantly increased from 8-16 points (average: 12.64±2.37) preoperative to 23-29 points(average: 26.7±1.82) at final follow-up(P<0.05); there was also significant difference between two groups at final follow-up. Compared to the median incision approach, unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation using channel-assisted by muscle-splitting approach has advantages of small incision, less trauma, fast recovery and so on. However, it also has shortages such as high surgical complications incidence, especially in cases that.

A Biomechanical Stability Study of Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Cadaveric Lumbar Spine Specimens.

BackgroundTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is an effective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. However, this fusion technique requires resection of inferior facet joint to provide access for superior facet joint resection, which results in reduced lumbar spinal stability and unnecessary trauma. We have previously developed extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ELIF) that can avoid back muscle injury with direct nerve root decompression. This study aims to show that ELIF enhances lumbar spinal stability in comparison to TLIF by comparing lumbar spinal stability of L4–L5 range of motion (ROM) on 12 cadaveric spine specimens after performing TLIF or ELIF.Methods12 cadaveric spine specimens were randomly divided and treated in accordance with the different internal fixations, including ELIF with a unilateral pedicle screw (ELIF+UPS), TLIF with a unilateral pedicle screw (TLIF+UPS), TLIF with a bilateral pedicle screw (TLIF+BPS), ELIF with a unilateral pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw (ELIF+UPS+TLFS) and ELIF with a bilateral pedicle screw (ELIF+BPS). The treatment groups were exposed to a 400-N load and 6 N·m movement force to calculate the angular displacement of L4-L5 during anterior flexion, posterior extension, lateral flexion and rotation operation conditions.ResultsThe ROM in ELIF+UPS group was smaller than that of TLIF+UPS group under all operating conditions, with the significant differences in left lateral flexion and right rotation by 36.15% and 25.97% respectively. The ROM in ELIF+UPS group was higher than that in TLIF+BPS group. The ROM in the ELIF+UPS+TLFS group was much smaller than that in the ELIF+UPS group, but was not significantly different than that in the TLIF+BPS group.ConclusionsDespite that TLIF+BPS has great stability, which can be comparable by that of ELIF+UPS. Additionally, ELIF stability can be further improved by using translaminar facet screws without causing more tissue damage to patient.

Comparison of three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases: At a mean follow up time of 46 months

ObjectivesThis study sought to retrospectively compare three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Patients and methodsThis was a retrospective single-center study including 84 patients who underwent TLIF instrumented with unilateral pedicle screws (UPS), unilateral pedicle screws plus contra-lateral translaminar facet screws (UPSFS), or bilateral pedicle screws (BPS) between June 2008 and May 2012. These patients were divided into three groups: UPS (n=22), UPSFS (n=28) and BPS (n=34) group. Operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, hospital bill, fusion status and complications were recorded and analyzed statistically. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA) were used to assess the preoperative and postoperative pain and functional outcome. Sagittal aligment was evaluated by the segment lordosis (SL) and whole lumbar spine lordosis (LL). ResultsThe mean follow up duration was 46.2 (ranging from 36 to 60) months. A significant decrease occurred in operative time, blood loss and hospital bill in UPS and UPSFS group, compared with BPS group (p<0.05). The average postoperative VAS, ODI and JOA scores improved significantly in each group than the preoperative counterparts (p<0.05), however, there were no significant difference between groups at any follow-up time point (p>0.05). No statistically difference was detected regarding fusion rate and complication rate between groups (p>0.05), except the screw/rod failure rate (p<0.05). Radiographic analysis showed that the LLs in all these groups got improved (p<0.05) and the SLs maintained (p>0.05). ConclusionUPS or UPSFS instrumented TLIF could achieve satisfactory mid-term clinical outcome comparable to BPS’s, with less surgical time, less blood loss, and lower cost; UPS should be prudently performed for two-level cases in case of lower fusion rate, and cannulated screws should be replaced by stronger solid screws in UPSFS to reduce facet screw breakage.

Mixed Fixation and Interbody Fusion for Treatment Single-Segment Lower Lumbar Vertebral Disease: Midterm Follow-up Results.

To investigate the midterm outcomes of unilateral pedicle screws combined with contralateral gunsight-guided translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease. A total of 78 patients with various lower lumbar single-segment vertebral diseases were treated in our department from January 2008 to December 2011. There were 21 males and 57 females, with an average age of 52.5 years, including lumbar disc degeneration (28 cases), local recurrence of lumbar disc herniation (9 cases), huge lumbar disc herniation (11 cases), lumbar disc herniation with spinal stenosis (13 cases), and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (degree I) (17 cases). All patients were treated by unilateral pedicle screws in the median incision combined with contralateral gunsight-guided translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion. No wound infection or skin necrosis around incision was observed after operation. No leakage of cerebrospinal fluid or nerve injury occurred during and after operation. Excepting 4 cases, 74 cases were followed up for 18-60 months, averaged 33.5 months. All but one patient (98.6%) received interbody fusion. The intervertebral height of the indexed level was well restored and maintained. At final follow-up. During follow-up, there was no screw loosening or pedicle fracture observed. No apparent degeneration of adjacent segments. The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores was increased significantly from 12.79 ± 2.12 preoperatively to 25.8 ± 2.87 at the final follow-up. Unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion showed good mid-term outcomes in the treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease, and can be used as an optimal choice for fixation and fusion of some single-segment lower lumbar vertebral diseases.

The combined use of unilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet joint screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

This paper is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using unilateral pedicle screws along with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation in comparison with the method using bilateral pedicle screws fixation (BPS) in degenerative lumbar diseases. Forty patients with single-level lumbar diseases were divided into two groups randomly. One group was treated by TLIF with BPS fixation while the other group was treated by the new technique with UPS+TFS fixation. The preoperative and postoperative ODI, JOA, VAPS scores, mean operation time, mean operation blood loss, fusion rate and complications were collected for comparison under two surgical methods. In terms of complications, only two cases of superficial infection in the BPS group and one case of urinary tract infection in the other group was found. The mean operation time and blood loss was significantly less in UPS+TFS group than in BPS group. The preoperation and postoperative ODI, JOA and VAPS at the intervals of 6 weeks, 3, 6 months and 1 year between the BPS and UPS+TFS group showed no significant disparities. Only one patient in UPS+TFS group was not fused with pseudoarthrosis formation. The clinical efficacy and safety of TLIF with UPS+TFS fixation were comparable to BPS fixation; however, the soft tissue injury and the corresponding operation cost were reduced with unilateral pedicle screw plus translaminar facet screw fixation.

Biomechanical study of unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

BackgroundThe biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw (UPS) combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw (TLFS), especially long-term stability, still needs to be compared to traditional UPS or bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) in details. MethodsTwenty-four porcine spines (L2–L5) were tested for flexibility with pure moments of 5Nm under intact status and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion status using UPS+TLFS, UPS or BPS at L3–L4. After short-term (3cycles) and long-term cyclic loading (18,000cycles), the range of motion was obtained and analyzed for single-level constructs in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation modes. In addition, the relative displacement of contralateral articular processes was recorded in a real time fashion. FindingsThe range of motion was significantly reduced in all instrumented constructs. In all movement directions, UPS+TLFS achieved similar range of motion to BPS after short and long-term loading, which were significantly lower than that in UPS. A significantly larger displacement of contralateral articular process was recorded in UPS than UPS+TLFS and BPS during extension/flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation, suggesting its compromised stability. InterpretationThe hybrid construct of UPS+TLFS showed instant and long-term equivalent biomechanical ability to that of traditional BPS, making it an alternative option to BPS that could be less invasive while maintains a stable and effective instrumentation.