Transition State For GTP Hydrolysis Research Articles

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins in GtoPdb v.2021.2

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [225, 529, 578, 583, 584, 742, 753, 444, 10].

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.5) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [183, 411, 446, 450, 451, 558, 566, 345, 9].

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [160, 377, 411, 415, 416, 512, 519, 312, 6].

Mechanisms of GTP hydrolysis and conformational transitions in the dynamin superfamily.

Dynamin superfamily proteins are multi-domain mechano-chemical GTPases which are implicated in nucleotide-dependent membrane remodeling events. A prominent feature of these proteins is their assembly-stimulated mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. The molecular basis for this reaction has been initially clarified for the dynamin-related guanylate binding protein 1 (GBP1) and involves the transient dimerization of the GTPase domains in a parallel head-to-head fashion. A catalytic arginine finger from the phosphate binding (P-) loop is repositioned towards the nucleotide of the same molecule to stabilize the transition state of GTP hydrolysis. Dynamin uses a related dimerization-dependent mechanism, but instead of the catalytic arginine, a monovalent cation is involved in catalysis. Still another variation of the GTP hydrolysis mechanism has been revealed for the dynamin-like Irga6 which bears a glycine at the corresponding position in the P-loop. Here, we highlight conserved and divergent features of GTP hydrolysis in dynamin superfamily proteins and show how nucleotide binding and hydrolysis are converted into mechano-chemical movements. We also describe models how the energy of GTP hydrolysis can be harnessed for diverse membrane remodeling events, such as membrane fission or fusion.

Noncanonical Myo9b-RhoGAP Accelerates RhoA GTP Hydrolysis by a Dual-Arginine-Finger Mechanism

The GTP hydrolysis activities of Rho GTPases are stimulated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which contain a RhoGAP domain equipped with a characteristic arginine finger and an auxiliary asparagine for catalysis. However, the auxiliary asparagine is missing in the RhoGAP domain of Myo9b (Myo9b-RhoGAP), a unique motorized RhoGAP that specifically targets RhoA for controlling cell motility. Here, we determined the structure of Myo9b-RhoGAP in complex with GDP-bound RhoA and magnesium fluoride. Unexpectedly, Myo9b-RhoGAP contains two arginine fingers at its catalytic site. The first arginine finger resembles the one within the canonical RhoGAP domains and inserts into the nucleotide-binding pocket of RhoA, whereas the second arginine finger anchors the Switch I loop of RhoA and interacts with the nucleotide, stabilizing the transition state of GTP hydrolysis and compensating for the lack of the asparagine. Mutating either of the two arginine fingers impaired the catalytic activity of Myo9b-RhoGAP and affected the Myo9b-mediated cell migration. Our data indicate that Myo9b-RhoGAP accelerates RhoA GTP hydrolysis by a previously unknown dual-arginine-finger mechanism, which may be shared by other noncanonical RhoGAP domains lacking the auxiliary asparagine.

Invited review: Mechanisms of GTP hydrolysis and conformational transitions in the dynamin superfamily.

ABSTRACTDynamin superfamily proteins are multidomain mechano‐chemical GTPases which are implicated in nucleotide‐dependent membrane remodeling events. A prominent feature of these proteins is their assembly‐ stimulated mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. The molecular basis for this reaction has been initially clarified for the dynamin‐related guanylate binding protein 1 (GBP1) and involves the transient dimerization of the GTPase domains in a parallel head‐to‐head fashion. A catalytic arginine finger from the phosphate binding (P‐) loop is repositioned toward the nucleotide of the same molecule to stabilize the transition state of GTP hydrolysis. Dynamin uses a related dimerization‐dependent mechanism, but instead of the catalytic arginine, a monovalent cation is involved in catalysis. Still another variation of the GTP hydrolysis mechanism has been revealed for the dynamin‐like Irga6 which bears a glycine at the corresponding position in the P‐loop. Here, we highlight conserved and divergent features of GTP hydrolysis in dynamin superfamily proteins and show how nucleotide binding and hydrolysis are converted into mechano‐chemical movements. We also describe models how the energy of GTP hydrolysis can be harnessed for diverse membrane remodeling events, such as membrane fission or fusion. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 105: 580–593, 2016.

Cis and trans interactions between atlastin molecules during membrane fusion

Atlastin (ATL), a membrane-anchored GTPase that mediates homotypic fusion of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes, is required for formation of the tubular network of the peripheral ER. How exactly ATL mediates membrane fusion is only poorly understood. Here we show that fusion is preceded by the transient tethering of ATL-containing vesicles caused by the dimerization of ATL molecules in opposing membranes. Tethering requires GTP hydrolysis, not just GTP binding, because the two ATL molecules are pulled together most strongly in the transition state of GTP hydrolysis. Most tethering events are futile, so that multiple rounds of GTP hydrolysis are required for successful fusion. Supported lipid bilayer experiments show that ATL molecules sitting on the same (cis) membrane can also undergo nucleotide-dependent dimerization. These results suggest that GTP hydrolysis is required to dissociate cis dimers, generating a pool of ATL monomers that can dimerize with molecules on a different (trans) membrane. In addition, tethering and fusion require the cooperation of multiple ATL molecules in each membrane. We propose a comprehensive model for ATL-mediated fusion that takes into account futile tethering and competition between cis and trans interactions.

Activation of Leukemia-associated RhoGEF by Gα13 with Significant Conformational Rearrangements in the Interface

The transient protein-protein interactions induced by guanine nucleotide-dependent conformational changes of G proteins play central roles in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling systems. Leukemia-associated RhoGEF (LARG), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rho, contains an RGS homology (RH) domain and Dbl homology/pleckstrin homology (DH/PH) domains and acts both as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and an effector for Galpha(13). However, the molecular mechanism of LARG activation upon Galpha(13) binding is not yet well understood. In this study, we analyzed the Galpha(13)-LARG interaction using cellular and biochemical methods, including a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis. The results obtained using various LARG fragments demonstrated that active Galpha(13) interacts with LARG through the RH domain, DH/PH domains, and C-terminal region. However, an alanine substitution at the RH domain contact position in Galpha(13) resulted in a large decrease in affinity. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that binding of Galpha(13) proceeds with a large negative heat capacity change (DeltaCp degrees ), accompanied by a positive entropy change (DeltaS degrees ). These results likely indicate that the binding of Galpha(13) with the RH domain triggers conformational rearrangements between Galpha(13) and LARG burying an exposed hydrophobic surface to create a large complementary interface, which facilitates complex formation through both GAP and effector interfaces, and activates the RhoGEF. We propose that LARG activation is regulated by an induced-fit mechanism through the GAP interface of Galpha(13).

Structural diversity in the RGS domain and its interaction with heterotrimeric G protein α-subunits

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate GTP hydrolysis by Galpha subunits and thus facilitate termination of signaling initiated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). RGS proteins hold great promise as disease intervention points, given their signature role as negative regulators of GPCRs-receptors to which the largest fraction of approved medications are currently directed. RGS proteins share a hallmark RGS domain that interacts most avidly with Galpha when in its transition state for GTP hydrolysis; by binding and stabilizing switch regions I and II of Galpha, RGS domain binding consequently accelerates Galpha-mediated GTP hydrolysis. The human genome encodes more than three dozen RGS domain-containing proteins with varied Galpha substrate specificities. To facilitate their exploitation as drug-discovery targets, we have taken a systematic structural biology approach toward cataloging the structural diversity present among RGS domains and identifying molecular determinants of their differential Galpha selectivities. Here, we determined 14 structures derived from NMR and x-ray crystallography of members of the R4, R7, R12, and RZ subfamilies of RGS proteins, including 10 uncomplexed RGS domains and 4 RGS domain/Galpha complexes. Heterogeneity observed in the structural architecture of the RGS domain, as well as in engagement of switch III and the all-helical domain of the Galpha substrate, suggests that unique structural determinants specific to particular RGS protein/Galpha pairings exist and could be used to achieve selective inhibition by small molecules.

Mechanism of Regulation of Prokaryotic Tubulin-like GTPase FtsZ by Membrane Protein EzrA

At initiation of cell division, FtsZ, a tubulin-like GTPase, assembles into a so-called Z-ring structure at the site of division. The formation of Z ring is negatively regulated by EzrA, which ensures only one ring at the midcell per cell cycle. The mechanism leading to the negative regulation of Z-ring formation by EzrA has been analyzed. Our data reveal that the interaction between EzrA and FtsZ not only reduces the GTP-binding ability of FtsZ but also accelerates the rate of GTP hydrolysis, both of which are unfavorable for the polymerization of FtsZ. Moreover, the acceleration in rate of GTP hydrolysis by EzrA is attributed to stabilization of the transition state for GTP hydrolysis and reduction in the affinity of GDP for FtsZ. Clearly, EzrA is able to modify the GTP hydrolysis cycle of FtsZ. On the basis of these results, a model for how EzrA acts to negatively regulate Z-ring formation is proposed.

Hyperactivation of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Signaling by a Gain-of-Function Mutant of the Rheb GTPase

Gain-of-function mutants of Ras and Rho family small GTPases have proven to be important tools in analyzing signaling downstream of these small GTPases. The Ras-related GTPase Rheb has emerged as a key player downstream of TSC1-2 in activating signaling to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) effectors of cell growth such as S6K and 4E-BP1. The TSC1-2 tumor suppressor complex has been shown to act as a RhebGAP, converting Rheb from a GTP-bound to a GDP-bound form. Here we report the identification of a mutant Rheb (S16HRheb) that exhibits gain-of-function properties. At endogenous levels of expression S16HRheb exhibits increased GTP loading in vivo and is resistant to TSC1-2 GAP in vitro. Compared with wild-type Rheb, S16HRheb is more active at promoting the phosphorylation of the mTOR effectors S6K1 and 4E-BP1. Thus S16HRheb will help to identify proximal signaling events downstream of Rheb and allow potential Rheb-independent functions downstream of TSC1-2 to be investigated.

The N Terminus of GTPγS-activated Transducin α-Subunit Interacts with the C Terminus of the cGMP Phosphodiesterase γ-Subunit

Dynamic regulation of G-protein signaling in the phototransduction cascade ensures the high temporal resolution of vision. In a key step, the activated alpha-subunit of transducin (Galphat-GTP) activates the cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) by binding the inhibitory gamma-subunit (PDEgamma). Significant progress in understanding the interaction between Galphat and PDEgamma was achieved by solving the crystal structure of the PDEgamma C-terminal peptide bound to Galphat in the transition state for GTP hydrolysis (Slep, K. C., Kercher, M. A., He, W., Cowan, C. W., Wensel, T. G., and Sigler, P. B. (2001) Nature 409, 1071-1077). However, some of the structural elements of each molecule were absent in the crystal structure. We have probed the binding surface between the PDEgamma C terminus and activated Galphat bound to guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)-triphosphate (GTPgammaS) using a series of full-length PDEgamma photoprobes generated by intein-mediated expressed protein ligation. For each of seven PDEgamma photoprobe species, expressed protein ligation allowed one benzoyl-L-phenylalaine substitution at selected hydrophobic C-terminal positions, and the addition of a biotin affinity tag at the extreme C terminus. We have detected photocross-linking from several PDEgamma C-terminal positions to the Galphat-GTPgammaS N terminus, particularly from PDEgamma residue 73. The overall percentage of cross-linking to the Galphat-GTPgammaSN terminus was analyzed using a far Western method for examining Galphat-GTPgammaS proteolytic digestion patterns. Furthermore, mass spectrometric analysis of cross-links to Galphat from a benzoyl-phenylalanine replacement at PDEgamma position 86 localized the region of photoinsertion to Galphat N-terminal residues Galphat-(22-26). This novel Galphat/PDEgamma interaction suggests that the transducin N terminus plays an active role in signal transduction.

STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS INTO TRANSLATIONAL FIDELITY

The underlying basis for the accuracy of protein synthesis has been the subject of over four decades of investigation. Recent biochemical and structural data make it possible to understand at least in outline the structural basis for tRNA selection, in which codon recognition by cognate tRNA results in the hydrolysis of GTP by EF-Tu over 75 A away. The ribosome recognizes the geometry of codon-anticodon base pairing at the first two positions but monitors the third, or wobble position, less stringently. Part of the additional binding energy of cognate tRNA is used to induce conformational changes in the ribosome that stabilize a transition state for GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu and subsequently result in accelerated accommodation of tRNA into the peptidyl transferase center. The transition state for GTP hydrolysis is characterized, among other things, by a distorted tRNA. This picture explains a large body of data on the effect of antibiotics and mutations on translational fidelity. However, many fundamental questions remain, such as the mechanism of activation of GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu, and the relationship between decoding and frameshifting.

Essential Role of Histidine 84 in Elongation Factor Tu for the Chemical Step of GTP Hydrolysis on the Ribosome

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is a GTP-binding protein that delivers aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the ribosome during protein synthesis. The mechanism of GTP hydrolysis in EF-Tu on the ribosome is poorly understood. It is known that mutations of a conserved histidine residue in the switch II region of the factor, His84 in Escherichia coli EF-Tu, impair GTP hydrolysis. However, the partial reaction which is directly affected by mutations of His84 was not identified and the effect on GTP hydrolysis was not quantified. Here, we show that the replacement of His84 with Ala reduces the rate constant of GTP hydrolysis more than 106-fold, whereas the preceding steps of ternary complex binding to the ribosome, codon recognition and, most importantly, the GTPase activation step are affected only slightly. These results show that His84 plays a key role in the chemical step of GTP hydrolysis. Rate constants of GTP hydrolysis by wild-type EF-Tu, measured using the slowly hydrolyzable GTP analog, GTPγS, showed no dependence on pH, indicating that His84 does not act as a general base. We propose that the catalytic role of His84 is to stabilize the transition state of GTP hydrolysis by hydrogen bonding to the attacking water molecule or, possibly, the γ-phosphate group of GTP.

Understanding the catalytic mechanism of GTPase-activating proteins: demonstration of the importance of switch domain stabilization in the stimulation of GTP hydrolysis.

Cdc42, a member of the Rho family of GTP-binding proteins, has been implicated in a variety of biological activities, including the organization of the actin cytoskeleton, changes in cell morphology and motility, intracellular trafficking, cell cycle progression, and cellular transformation. The cycling of Cdc42 between its on (GTP-bound) and off (GDP-bound) states is essential for its stimulation of cell growth and transformation, with an important aspect of this cycle being the regulation of the GTP hydrolytic activity of Cdc42 by its GTPase-activating protein (Cdc42GAP). On the basis of the structural determinations of the Cdc42-Cdc42GAP complex, as well as the Ras-RasGAP complex, it has been proposed that an arginine residue provided by the GAP (called the "arginine finger") stabilizes charges developing on the guanine nucleotide during the transition state for GTP hydrolysis and is an important contributor to GAP-stimulated catalysis. However, the 85 kDa regulatory subunit (p85) of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI-3K) is homologous with the Cdc42GAP and contains the essential arginine residue, but is ineffective as a GAP. This argues that the introduction of the arginine finger is insufficient for GAP activity and that the GAP must fulfill an additional function, one possibility being the engagement and stabilization of the conformationally sensitive switch regions of Cdc42. In the study presented here, we have tested this idea by examining three residues within the Cdc42GAP, which are missing in the GAP homology domain of the 85 kDa regulatory subunit (p85) of the PI 3-kinase and are involved in specific interactions with switch domain residues of Cdc42. We show that the mutation of all three residues, as well as individual mutations of each of these residues, yields GAPs that are defective in stimulating GTP hydrolysis. We further demonstrate that the switch I residue tyrosine 32 plays an important role in GAP interactions and in the regulation of both intrinsic and GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis. Taken together, these findings indicate that stabilizing the switch domains of GTP-binding proteins is an important part of GAP-stimulated catalysis, and that the inability of p85 to participate in these interactions may at least in part explain its ineffectiveness as a GAP.

Conformational Change of Elongation Factor Tu (EF-Tu) Induced by Antibiotic Binding: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COMPLEX BETWEEN EF-Tu·GDP AND AURODOX

Aurodox is a member of the family of kirromycin antibiotics, which inhibit protein biosynthesis by binding to elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). We have determined the crystal structure of the 1:1:1 complex of Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu with GDP and aurodox to 2.0-A resolution. During its catalytic cycle, EF-Tu adopts two strikingly different conformations depending on the nucleotide bound: the GDP form and the GTP form. In the present structure, a GTP complex-like conformation of EF-Tu is observed, although GDP is bound to the nucleotide-binding site. This is consistent with previous proposals that aurodox fixes EF-Tu on the ribosome by locking it in its GTP form. Binding of EF-Tu.GDP to aminoacyl-tRNA and mutually exclusive binding of kirromycin and elongation factor Ts to EF-Tu can be explained on the basis of the structure. For many previously observed mutations that provide resistance to kirromycin, it can now be understood how they prevent interaction with the antibiotic. An unexpected feature of the structure is the reorientation of the His-85 side chain toward the nucleotide-binding site. We propose that this residue stabilizes the transition state of GTP hydrolysis, explaining the acceleration of the reaction by kirromycin-type antibiotics.

The Mechanism of GTP Hydrolysis by Ras Probed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Time-resolved Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in combination with photo-induced release of (18)O-labeled caged nucleotide has been employed to address mechanistic issues of GTP hydrolysis by Ras protein. Infrared spectroscopy of Ras complexes with nitrophenylethyl (NPE)-[alpha-(18)O(2)]GTP, NPE-[beta-(18)O(4)]GTP, or NPE-[gamma-(18)O(3)]GTP upon photolysis or during hydrolysis afforded a substantially improved mode assignment of phosphoryl group absorptions. Photolysis spectra of hydroxyphenylacyl-GTP and hydroxyphenylacyl-GDP bound to Ras and several mutants, Ras(Gly(12))-Mn(2+), Ras(Pro(12)), Ras(Ala(12)), and Ras(Val(12)), were obtained and yielded valuable information about structures of GTP or GDP bound to Ras mutants. IR spectra revealed stronger binding of GDP beta-PO(3)(2-) moiety by Ras mutants with higher activity, suggesting that the transition state is largely GDP-like. Analysis of the photolysis and hydrolysis FTIR spectra of the [beta-nonbridge-(18)O(2), alphabeta-bridge-(18)O]GTP isotopomer allowed us to probe for positional isotope exchange. Such a reaction might signal the existence of metaphosphate as a discrete intermediate, a key species for a dissociative mechanism. No positional isotope exchange was observed. Overall, our results support a concerted mechanism, but the transition state seems to have a considerable amount of dissociative character. This work demonstrates that time-resolved FTIR is highly suitable for monitoring positional isotope exchange and advantageous in many aspects over previously used methods, such as (31)P NMR and mass spectrometry.

Nucleotide-binding characteristics of human guanylate-binding protein 1 (hGBP1) and identification of the third GTP-binding motif

hGBP1 is a GTPase with antiviral activity encoded by an interferon-activated human gene. Specific binding of hGBP1 to guanine nucleotides has been established although only two classical GTP-binding motifs were found in its primary sequence. The unique position of hGBP1 amongst known GTPases is further demonstrated by the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP and GMP. Although subsequent cleavage of orthophosphates rather than pyrophosphate was demonstrated, GDP coming from bulk solution cannot serve as a substrate. The relation of guanine nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to the antiviral function of hGBP1 is unknown. Here we show similar binding affinities for all three guanine nucleotides and the ability of both products, GDP and GMP, to compete with GTP binding. Fluorimetry and isothermal titration calorimetry were applied to prove that only one nucleotide binding site is present in hGBP1. Furthermore, we identified the third canonical GTP-binding motif and verified its role in nucleotide recognition by mutational analysis. The high guanine nucleotide dissociation rates measured by stopped-flow kinetics are responsible for the weak affinities to hGBP1 when compared to other GTPases like Ras or Gα. By means of fluorescence and NMR spectroscopy it is demonstrated that aluminium fluoride forms a complex with hGBP1 only in the GDP state, presumably mimicking the transition state of GTP hydrolysis. Tentatively, the involvement of a GAP domain in hGBP1 in GTP hydrolysis is suggested. These results will serve as a basis for the determination of the differential biological functions of the three nucleotide states and for the elucidation of the unique mechanism of nucleotide hydrolysis catalysed by hGBP1.

Modulation of the Affinity and Selectivity of RGS Protein Interaction with Gα Subunits by a Conserved Asparagine/Serine Residue

The crystal structure of the complex between a G protein alpha subunit (Gi alpha 1) and its GTPase-activating protein (RGS4) demonstrated that RGS4 acts predominantly by stabilization of the transition state for GTP hydrolysis [Tesmer, J. J., et al. (1997) Cell 89, 251]. However, attention was called to a conserved Asn residue (Asn128) that could play a catalytic role by interacting, directly or indirectly, with the hydrolytic water molecule. We have analyzed the effects of several disparate substitutions for Asn128 on the GAP activity of RGS4 toward four G alpha substrates (Go, Gi, Gq, and Gz) using two assay formats. The results substantiate the importance of this residue but indicate that it is largely involved in substrate binding and that its function may vary with different G alpha targets. Various mutations decreased the apparent affinity of RGS4 for substrate G alpha proteins by several orders of magnitude, but had variable and modest effects on maximal rates of GTP hydrolysis when tested with different G alpha subunits. One mutation, N128F, that differentially decreased the GAP activity toward G alpha i compared with that toward G alpha q could be partially suppressed by mutation of the nearby residue in G alpha i to that found in G alpha q (K180P). Detection of GAP activities of the mutants was enhanced in sensitivity up to 100-fold by assay at steady state in proteoliposomes that contain heterotrimeric G protein and receptor.

Inhibition of regulator of G protein signaling function by two mutant RGS4 proteins.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins limit the lifetime of activated (GTP-bound) heterotrimeric G protein a subunits by acting as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Mutation of two residues in RGS4, which, based on the crystal structure of RGS4 complexed with G(i alpha1)-GDP-AIF4-, directly contact G(i alpha1) (N88 and L159), essentially abolished RGS4 binding and GAP activity. Mutation of another contact residue (S164) partially inhibited both binding and GAP activity. Two other mutations, one of a contact residue (R167M/A) and the other an adjacent residue (F168A), also significantly reduced RGS4 binding to G(i alpha1)-GDP-AIF4-, but in addition redirected RGS4 binding toward the GTPgammaS-bound form. These two mutant proteins had severely impaired GAP activity, but in contrast to the others behaved as RGS antagonists in GAP and in vivo signaling assays. Overall, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that the predominant role of RGS proteins is to stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis. In addition, mutant RGS proteins can be created with an altered binding preference for the G(i alpha)-GTP conformation, suggesting that efficient RGS antagonists can be developed.