Transcription In Archaea Research Articles

How to Shut Down Transcription in Archaea during Virus Infection.

Multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) carry out transcription in all domains of life; during virus infection, RNAPs are targeted by transcription factors encoded by either the cell or the virus, resulting in the global repression of transcription with distinct outcomes for different host–virus combinations. These repressors serve as versatile molecular probes to study RNAP mechanisms, as well as aid the exploration of druggable sites for the development of new antibiotics. Here, we review the mechanisms and structural basis of RNAP inhibition by the viral repressor RIP and the crenarchaeal negative regulator TFS4, which follow distinct strategies. RIP operates by occluding the DNA-binding channel and mimicking the initiation factor TFB/TFIIB. RIP binds tightly to the clamp and locks it into one fixed position, thereby preventing conformational oscillations that are critical for RNAP function as it progresses through the transcription cycle. TFS4 engages with RNAP in a similar manner to transcript cleavage factors such as TFS/TFIIS through the NTP-entry channel; TFS4 interferes with the trigger loop and bridge helix within the active site by occlusion and allosteric mechanisms, respectively. The conformational changes in RNAP described above are universally conserved and are also seen in inactive dimers of eukaryotic RNAPI and several inhibited RNAP complexes of both bacterial and eukaryotic RNA polymerases, including inactive states that precede transcription termination. A comparison of target sites and inhibitory mechanisms reveals that proteinaceous repressors and RNAP-specific antibiotics use surprisingly common ways to inhibit RNAP function.

Characterization of the Transcription Termination Factor Responsible for Polarity in Archaea

The absence of a nuclear compartment permits prokaryotic ribosomes to bind nascent RNAs to initiate translation before a transcript is completely synthesized. Transcription and translation are normally tightly coupled in prokaryotes (Archaea and Bacteria) and uncoupling translation from transcription serves as a regulatory signal, permitting premature transcription termination when translation fails or is inhibited. The resultant decrease in downstream gene expression, termed polarity, is a major regulatory pathway to ensure coordinated gene expression. While the importance and widespread use of polar repression is well documented, to date, the factor responsible for polarity in archaea cells has not been explicitly identified.In bacteria, the transcription termination factor rho is responsible for polarity, but there are no rho homologues encoded in archaeal genomes. FttA (Factor that terminates transcription in Archaea), a recently identified archaeal termination factor, appears to potentially fulfill the requirements to direct polarity in archaea, but other factors may be responsible. Our primary objective, employing an unbiased genetic selection, is to identify the transcription termination factor(s) responsible for polar repression in Archaea.We have established and will present our findings resultant from a three‐tiered genetic selection for spontaneous mutations that impact the efficiency of polar repression in archaeal cells. The selections were carried out in specialized strains of Thermococcus kodakarensis, a marine, hyperthermophilic archaeon with a facile genetic system and robust laboratory growth.Briefly, genomic modifications were introduced to place a non‐essential gene with a premature translation stop codon directly upstream and within the same operon of a reporter or essential (selection) gene. In wide‐type strains, the early stop codon permits a polarity factor to recognize uncoupling of transcription and translation and terminate transcription before productive expression of the downstream essential gene. However, when the activity of a polarity factor(s) is hindered, these selective genes can be expressed at high levels. For selection, the final genes of the tryptophan and histidine synthesis pathway were chosen, constructing auxotrophic mutant strains which can only develop in the absence of tryptophan and histidine if there is some disruption in polarity‐ allowing them to become prototrophic. The spontaneous mutations resultant in reduced polar repression are easily identified through whole‐genome sequencing and we present evidence for roles of multiple factors in mediating polarity in archaeal cells.

FttA is a CPSF73 homologue that terminates transcription in Archaea.

Regulated gene expression is achieved in large part by controlling the activities of essential, multi-subunit RNA polymerase transcription elongation complexes (TECs). The extreme stability required of TECs to processively transcribe large genomic regions necessitates robust mechanisms to terminate transcription. Efficient transcription termination is particularly critical for gene-dense bacterial and archaeal genomes1-3 wherein continued transcription would necessarily transcribe immediately adjacent genes, result in conflicts between the transcription and replication apparatuses4-6 and the coupling of transcription and translation7,8 would permit loading of ribosomes onto aberrant transcripts. Only select sequences or transcription termination factors can disrupt the otherwise extremely stable TEC and we demonstrate that one of the last universally conserved archaeal proteins with unknown biological function is the Factor that terminates transcription in Archaea (FttA). FttA resolves the dichotomy of a prokaryotic gene structure (operons and polarity) and eukaryotic molecular homology (general transcription apparatus) observed in Archaea. This missing-link between prokaryotic and eukaryotic transcription regulation provides the most parsimonious link to the evolution of the processing activities involved in RNA 3’-end formation in Eukarya.

Transcription in Archaea: in vitro transcription assays for mjRNAP.

The fully recombinant Methanocaldococcus jannaschii RNA polymerase allows for a detailed dissection of the different stages of the transcription. In the previous chapter, we discussed how to purify the different components of the M. jannaschii transcription system, the RNA polymerase subunits, and general transcription factors and how to assemble a functional M. jannaschii enzyme. Standard in vitro transcription assays can be used to examine the different stages of transcription. In this chapter, we describe how some of these assays have been optimized for M. jannaschii RNA polymerase, which transcribes at much higher temperatures than many other transcription complexes.

Identification of a crenarchaeal orthologue of Elf1: implications for chromatin and transcription in Archaea.

The transcription machineries of Archaea and eukaryotes are similar in many aspects, but little is understood about archaeal chromatin and its role in transcription. Here, we describe the identification in hyperthermophilic Crenarchaeota and a Korarchaeon of an orthologue of the eukaryotic transcription elongation factor Elf1, which has been shown to function in chromatin structure maintenance of actively transcribed templates. Our discovery has implications for the relationship of chromatin and transcription in Archaea and the evolution of these processes in eukaryotes.This article was reviewed by Chris P. Ponting and Eugene V. Koonin.

Crystal structure of NusG N‐terminal (NGN) domain from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii and its interaction with rpoE″

Transcription in archaea employs a eukaryotic-type transcription apparatus but uses bacterial-type transcription factors. NusG is one of the few archaeal transcription factors whose orthologs are essential in both bacteria and eukaryotes. Archaeal NusG is composed of only an NusG N-terminal (NGN) domain and a KOW domain, which is similar to bacterial NusG but not to the eukaryotic ortholog, Spt5. However, archaeal NusG was confirmed recently to form a complex with rpoE'' that was similar to the Spt5-Spt4 complex. Thus, archaeal NusG presents hybrid features of Spt5 and bacterial NusG. Here we report the crystal structure of NGN from the archaea Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (MjNGN). MjNGN folds to an alpha-beta-alpha sandwich without the appendant domain of bacterial NGNs, and forms a unique homodimer in crystal and solution. MjNGN alone was found to be sufficient for rpoE'' binding and an MjNGN-rpoE'' model has been constructed by rigid docking.

Comprehensive Analysis of Archaeal tRNA Genes Reveals Rapid Increase of tRNA Introns in the Order Thermoproteales

The analysis of archaeal tRNA genes is becoming more important to evaluate the origin and evolution of tRNA molecule. Even with the recent accumulation of complete genomes of numerous archaeal species, several tRNA genes are still required for a full complement of the codon table. We conducted comprehensive screening of tRNA genes from 47 archaeal genomes by using a combination of different types of tRNA prediction programs and extracted a total of 2,143 reliable tRNA gene candidates including 437 intron-containing tRNA genes, which covered more than 99.9% of the codon tables in Archaea. Previously, the content of intron-containing tRNA genes in Archaea was estimated to be approximately 15% of the whole tRNA genes, and most of the introns were known to be located at canonical positions (nucleotide position between 37 and 38) of precursor tRNA (pre-tRNA). Surprisingly, we observed marked enrichment of tRNA introns in five species of the archaeal order Thermoproteales; about 70% of tRNA gene candidates were found to be intron-containing tRNA genes, half of which contained multiple introns, and the introns were located at various noncanonical positions. Sequence similarity analysis revealed that approximately half of the tRNA introns found at Thermoproteales-specific intron locations were highly conserved among several tRNA genes. Intriguingly, identical tRNA intron sequences were found within different types of tRNA genes that completely lacked exon sequence similarity, suggesting that the tRNA introns in Thermoproteales could have been gained via intron insertion events at a later stage of tRNA evolution. Moreover, although the CCA sequence at the 3' terminal of pre-tRNA is added by a CCA-adding enzyme after gene transcription in Archaea, most of the tRNA genes containing highly conserved introns already encode the CCA sequence at their 3' terminal. Based on these results, we propose possible models explaining the rapid increase of tRNA introns as a result of intron insertion events via retrotransposition of pre-tRNAs. The sequences and secondary structures of the tRNA genes and their bulge-helix-bulge motifs were registered in SPLITSdb (http://splits.iab.keio.ac.jp/splitsdb/), a novel and comprehensive database for archaeal tRNA genes.

Transcriptional linkage of Haloferax volcanii proteasomal genes with non-proteasomal gene neighbours including RNase P, MOSC domain and SAM-methyltransferase homologues

Comparative genomics reveals a common theme of 20S proteasome and proteasome-activating nucleotidase genes dispersed throughout archaeal genomes yet arranged in conserved linkages with gene homologues of translation and/or transcription machineries. To provide biological evidence for these linkages as well as insight into proteasome operon organization, transcripts of the five proteasomal genes of the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii were analysed by Northern (RNA) blotting, RT-PCR and primer extension. These included psmA, psmB and psmC, encoding the 20S proteasomal subunits alpha1, beta and alpha2, as well as panA and panB, encoding the PanA and PanB proteasome-activating nucleotidase proteins, respectively. All five of these genes are dispersed throughout the H. volcanii genome. For each proteasomal gene, a distinct transcript was detected by Northern blotting that was similar in size to the respective coding region. For both psmA and psmC, an additional transcript was detected that was 1.34 and 0.85 kb greater, respectively, than the coding region. Further analysis by Northern blotting and RT-PCR revealed that psmA was co-transcribed with genes encoding a Pop5 homologue of the RNase P endoRNase as well as an S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase. Likewise, psmC was co-transcribed with a downstream gene encoding a molybdenum cofactor sulfurase C-terminal (MOSC) domain protein. Additional proteasomal and neighbouring gene-specific transcriptional linkages were detected by RT-PCR. These results provide the first evidence that proteasome and tRNA modification genes are co-transcribed, reveal that a number of additional enzymes including those predicted to facilitate metal-sulfur cluster assembly are co-regulated with proteasomes at the transcriptional level, and provide further insight into proteasome gene transcription in archaea.

Protein-Protein Interactions in the Archaeal Transcriptional Machinery: BINDING STUDIES OF ISOLATED RNA POLYMERASE SUBUNITS AND TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS

Transcription in Archaea is directed by a pol II-like RNA polymerase and homologues of TBP and TFIIB (TFB) but the crystal structure of the archaeal enzyme and the subunits involved in recruitment of RNA polymerase to the promoter-TBP-TFB-complex are unknown. We described here the cloning expression and purification of 11 bacterially expressed subunits of the Pyrococcus furiosus RNAP. Protein interactions of subunits with each other and of archaeal transcription factors TFB and TFB with RNAP subunits were studied by Far-Western blotting and reconstitution of subcomplexes from single subunits in solution. In silico comparison of a consensus sequence of archaeal RNAP subunits with the sequence of yeast pol II subunits revealed a high degree of conservation of domains of the enzymes forming the cleft and catalytic center of the enzyme. Interaction studies with the large subunits were complicated by the low solubility of isolated subunits B, A', and A'', but an interaction network of the smaller subunits of the enzyme was established. Far-Western analyses identified subunit D as structurally important key polypeptide of RNAP involved in interactions with subunits B, L, N, and P and revealed also a strong interaction of subunits E' and F. Stable complexes consisting of subunits E' and F, of D and L and a BDLNP-subcomplex were reconstituted and purified. Gel shift analyses revealed an association of the BDLNP subcomplex with promoter-bound TBP-TFB. These results suggest a major role of subunit B (Rpb2) in RNAP recruitment to the TBP-TFB promoter complex.

Physical and functional interaction of the archaeal single-stranded DNA-binding protein SSB with RNA polymerase.

Archaeal transcription utilizes a complex multisubunit RNA polymerase and the basal transcription factors TBP and TF(II)B, closely resembling its eukaryal counterpart. We have uncovered a tight physical and functional interaction between RNA polymerase and the single-stranded DNA-binding protein SSB in Sulfolobus solfataricus. SSB stimulates transcription from promoters in vitro under TBP-limiting conditions and supports transcription in the absence of TBP. SSB also rescues transcription from repression by reconstituted chromatin. We demonstrate the potential for promoter melting by SSB, suggesting a plausible basis for the stimulation of transcription. This stimulation requires both the single-stranded DNA-binding domain and the acidic C-terminal tail of the SSB. The tail forms a stable interaction with RNA polymerase. These data reveal an unexpected role for single-stranded DNA-binding proteins in transcription in archaea.

Basal and regulated transcription in Archaea.

The basal transcription machinery of Archaea is fundamentally related to the eucaryal RNA polymerase (RNAP) II apparatus. In addition to a 12-subunit RNAP, Archaea possess two general transcription factors, the activities of which are required for accurate and efficient in vitro transcription. These factors, TBP and TFB, are homologues of the eucaryal TATA-box binding protein and TFIIB respectively. Archaea also possess TFE, a homologue of the eucaryal RNAP II general transcription factor TFIIE. Although not absolutely required for transcription in vitro, TFE nonetheless plays a stimulatory role under conditions where promoter recognition by TBP is sub-optimal. The basal transcription apparatus of Archaea is closely related to that of Eucarya but archaeal transcriptional regulators resemble those of bacteria. The mode of action of two such regulators has been characterized to determine how these 'bacterial-like' regulators impinge on the 'eucaryal-like' basal machinery.

Mechanism and regulation of transcription in Archaea

Mechanism and regulation of transcription in Archaea

Events during initiation of archaeal transcription: open complex formation and DNA-protein interactions.

Transcription in Archaea is initiated by association of a TATA box binding protein (TBP) with a TATA box. This interaction is stabilized by the binding of the transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) orthologue TFB. We show here that the RNA polymerase of the archaeon Methanococcus, in contrast to polymerase II, does not require hydrolysis of the beta-gamma bond of ATP for initiation of transcription and open complex formation on linearized DNA. Permanganate probing revealed that the archaeal open complex spanned at least the DNA region from -11 to -1 at a tRNA(Val) promoter. The Methanococcus TBP-TFB promoter complex protected the DNA region from -40 to -14 on the noncoding DNA strand and the DNA segment from -36 to -17 on the coding DNA strand from DNase I digestion. This DNase I footprint was extended only to the downstream end by the addition of the RNA polymerase to position +17 on the noncoding strand and to position +13 on the coding DNA strand.

Basal and regulated transcription in Archaea

Basal and regulated transcription in Archaea

Transcription in archaea: similarity to that in eucarya.

We present homologies between archaeal and eucaryal DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) subunits and transcription factors. The sequences of the Sulfolobus acidocaldarius subunits D, E, and N and alignments with eucaryal homologs are presented here. The similarities between archaeal transcription factors and their eucaryal homologs TFIIB and TBP have been established in other laboratories. The archaeal RNAP subunits H, K, and N, respectively, show high sequence similarity to ABC27, ABC23, and ABC10 beta (found in all three eucaryal RNAPs); subunit D, to AC40 (common to polymerase II and polymerase III) and B44 (polymerase II); and subunit L, to AC19 and B12.5. The similarity of subunit D and its eucaryal homologs to bacterial alpha is limited to the "alpha-motif," which is also present in subunit L and its eucaryal homologs. Genes encoding homologs of the related eucaryal RNAP subunits A12.2/B12.6 and also homologs of eucaryal transcription elongation factors of the TFIIS family have been detected in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and Thermococcus celer. In archaea, the protein is not an RNAP subunit. Together with the sequence similarities between archaeal box A-containing and eucaryal TATA box-containing promoters, this shows that the archaeal and eucaryal transcription systems are truly homologous and that they differ structurally and functionally from the bacterial transcription machinery. In contrast, however, a number of genes for the archaeal transcription apparatus are organized in clusters resembling the clusters of transcription-associated genes in Bacteria.

Control regions of an archaeal gene: A TATA box and an initiator element promote cell-free transcription of the tRNA Val gene of Methanococcus vannielii

To identify the DNA sequences required for initiation of transcription in archaea, the 5′-flanking region of the tRNA Val gene of Methanococcus vannielii was modified by deletions, restructuring and site-directed mutagenesis, and the tRNA encoding sequence was replaced by a fortuitous Escherichia coli sequence. The effects of these mutations on promoter function were tested in an homologous cell-free transcription system. The DNA region from position −35 to +9 relative to the transcription start site was sufficient for maximal initiation of cell-free transcription. Removal of the DNA region between −35 and −30 reduced initiation by a factor of 2. Deletions extending to position −24 almost completely abolished specific transcription. Analysis of 16 site-specific mutations in the region from −33 to +2 provided evidence that a conserved A + T-rich sequence (TATA box), centered at −25, is essential for initiation of transcription. Single point mutations in six positions of the TATA box reduced initiation of transcription from 0·2 to 0·01 of wild-type levels. A second conserved motif at the transcription start site (consensus ATGC) could be replaced by some sequences containing a pyrimidine-purine dinucleotide but appeared necessary for a maximal rate of gene transcription. Mutations altering the spacing between the two conserved elements demonstrated that initiation occurs at a strictly defined distance of 22 to 27 base-pairs downstream from the TATA box. Our results support the conclusion that the TATA box is the major DNA region mediating promoter recognition, influencing the efficiency of transcription and specifying the site of transcription initiation. This Methanococcus promoter element closely resembles in structure and function the TATA box of promoters of eukaryotic protein-encoding genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II.