Transcription-coupled DNA Supercoiling Research Articles

Localized modulation of DNA supercoiling, triggered by the Shigella anti-silencer VirB, is sufficient to relieve H-NS-mediated silencing.

In Bacteria, nucleoid structuring proteins govern nucleoid dynamics and regulate transcription. In Shigella spp., at ≤30°C, the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein (H-NS) transcriptionally silences many genes on the large virulence plasmid. Upon a switch to 37°C, VirB, a DNA binding protein and key transcriptional regulator of Shigella virulence, is produced. VirB functions to counter H-NS-mediated silencing in a process called transcriptional anti-silencing. Here, we show that VirB mediates a loss of negative DNA supercoils from our plasmid-borne, VirB-regulated PicsP-lacZ reporterin vivo. The changes are not caused by a VirB-dependent increase in transcription, nor do they require the presence of H-NS. Instead, the VirB-dependent change in DNA supercoiling requires the interaction of VirB with its DNA binding site, a critical first step in VirB-dependent gene regulation. Using two complementary approaches, we show that VirB:DNA interactions in vitro introduce positive supercoils in plasmid DNA. Subsequently, by exploiting transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling, we reveal that a localized loss of negative supercoils is sufficient to alleviate H-NS-mediated transcriptional silencingindependently of VirB. Together, our findings provide novel insight into VirB,a central regulator of Shigella virulenceand, more broadly, a molecular mechanism that offsets H-NS-dependent silencing of transcription in bacteria.

Fis protein forms DNA topological barriers to confine transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling in Escherichiacoli.

Previously, we demonstrated that transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) potently activated or inhibited nearby promoters in Escherichiacoli even in the presence of all four DNA topoisomerases, suggesting that DNA topoisomerases are not the only factors regulating TCDS. A different mechanism exists to confine this localized DNA supercoiling. Using an invivo system containing the TCDS-activated leu-500 promoter (Pleu-500 ), we find that the nucleoid-associated Fis protein potently inhibits the TCDS-mediated activation of Pleu-500 . We also find that deletion of the fis gene significantly enhances TCDS-mediated inhibition of transcription of three genes purH, yieP, and yrdA divergently coupled to different rrn operons in the early log phase. These results suggest that Fis protein forms DNA topological barriers upon binding to its recognition sites, blocks TCDS diffusion, and potently inhibits the TCDS-activated Pleu-500 .

Inhibition of the gyrA promoter by transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli

The E. coli gyrA promoter (PgyrA) is a DNA supercoiling sensitive promoter, stimulated by relaxation of DNA templates, and inhibited by (−) DNA supercoiling in bacteria. However, whether PgyrA can be inhibited by transient and localized transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) has not been fully examined. In this paper, using different DNA templates including the E. coli chromosome, we show that transient and localized TCDS strongly inhibits PgyrA in E. coli. This result can be explained by a twin-supercoiled domain model of transcription in which (+) and (−) supercoiled domains are generated around the transcribing RNA polymerase. We also find that fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, can substantially increase the expression of the firefly luciferase under the control of the PgyrA coupled to a divergent IPTG-inducible promoter in the presence of IPTG. This stimulation of PgyrA by fluoroquinolones can be also explained by the twin-supercoiled domain model of transcription. This unique property of TCDS may be configured into a high throughput-screening (HTS) assay to identify antimicrobial compounds targeting bacterial DNA gyrase.

Three tandem promoters, together with IHF, regulate growth phase dependent expression of the Escherichia coli kps capsule gene cluster

In this study we characterise three tandem promoters (PR1-1, PR1-2 and PR1-3) within the PR1 regulatory region of the Escherichia coli kps capsule gene cluster. Transcription from promoter PR1-2 was dependent on the activity of the upstream promoter PR1-1, which activated PR1-2 via transcription coupled DNA supercoiling. During growth at 37 °C a temporal pattern of transcription from all three promoters was observed with maximum transcriptional activity evident during mid-exponential phase followed by a sharp decrease in activity as the cells enter stationary phase. The growth phase dependent transcription was regulated by Integration Host Factor (IHF), which bound within the PR1 region to repress transcription from PR1-2 and PR1-3. This pattern of transcription was mirrored by growth phase dependent expression of the K1 capsule. Overall these data reveal a complex pattern of transcriptional regulation for an important virulence factor with IHF playing a role in regulating growth phase expression.

Transient and dynamic DNA supercoiling potently stimulates the leu-500 promoter in Escherichia coli

The inactive prokaryotic leu-500 promoter (Pleu-500) contains a single A-to-G point mutation in the −10 region of the leucine operon promoter, which causes leucine auxotrophy. This promoter can be activated by (−) DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli topA strains. However, whether this activation arises from global, permanent, or transient, dynamic supercoiling is still not fully understood. In this article, using a newly established in vivo system carrying a pair of divergently coupled promoters, i.e. an IPTG-inducible promoter and Pleu-500 that control the expression of lacZ and luc (the firefly luciferase gene), respectively, we demonstrate that transient, dynamic (−) DNA supercoiling provided by divergent transcription in both wild-type and topA strains can potently activate Pleu-500. We found that this activation depended on the promoter strength and the length of RNA transcripts, which are functional characteristics of transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) precisely predicted by the twin-supercoiled domain model of transcription in which a (+) supercoiled domain is produced ahead of the RNA polymerase and a (−) supercoiled domain behind it. We also demonstrate that TCDS can be generated on topologically open DNA molecules, i.e. linear DNA molecules, in Escherichia coli, suggesting that topological boundaries or barriers are not required for the production of TCDS in vivo. This work demonstrates that transient, dynamic TCDS by RNA polymerases is a major chromosome remodeling force in E. coli and greatly influences the nearby, coupled promoters/transcription.

Effect of FIS on Transcription-Coupled DNA Supercoiling in E. coli

For decades, it has been recognized that transcribing along the DNA double helix by a RNA polymerase can enhance localized DNA supercoiling. This process has been elegantly explained by a “twin-supercoiled-domain” model of transcription in which positive DNA supercoils are generated ahead of a translocating RNA polymerase and negative supercoils behind it. In this study, we utilized bacterial genetics and biochemical approaches to investigate how FIS protein regulates transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) by the strong rrnB P1, P2 promoters. We first generated several E. coli strains including MG1655(DE3)ΔfisΔlacZ and VS111(DE3)ΔfisΔlacZ using the λ Red recombination system. We then inserted the divergently coupled Pleu-500 and IPTG-inducible rrnB P1, P2 promoters with the luc and lacZ genes to the attTn7 site of the E. coli chromosome. Additionally, the upstream region of the rrnB P1 promoter including the three FIS-binding sites was placed between the Pleu-500 and the rrnB P1, P2 promoters. Our results showed that TCDS initiated from the rrnB P1, P2 promoters greatly activated the divergently coupled Pleu-500 promoter. Intriguingly, we found that FIS protein activated the transcription from the P1 and P2 promoters and potently inhibited the activation of the Pleu-500 promoter by TCDS. Our results are consistent with a model in which FIS protein forms topological barriers upon binding to its recognition sites in the upstream region of the rrnB P1 promoter, blocks TCDS diffusion, and potently inhibits the activation of the Pleu-500 promoter by TCDS. Likewise, TCDS generated from the strong P1 and P2 promoters bounced back and activated the P1 and P2 promoters. We also used atomic force microscopy to examine the shape and volume of these E. coli mutant strains.

Transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling dictates the chromosomal arrangement of bacterial genes.

Over the recent decade, the central importance of DNA supercoiling in chromosome organization and global gene regulation of bacteria became more and more visible. With a regulon comprising more than 2000 genes in Escherichia coli, DNA supercoiling is among the most influential regulators of gene expression found in bacteria so far. However, the mechanism creating thousands of diverse temporal gene expression patterns coordinated by DNA supercoiling remains unclear. In this study we show that a specific chromosomal arrangement of genes modulates the local levels of DNA supercoiling at gene promoters via transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) in the model organism E. coli. Our findings provide a consistent explanation for the strong positive coupling of temporal gene expression patterns of neighboring genes. Using comparative genomics we are furthermore able to provide evidence that TCDS is a driving force for the evolution of chromosomal gene arrangement patterns in other Enterobacteriaceae. With the currently available data of promoter supercoiling sensitivity we prove that the same principle is applicable also for the evolutionary distant gram-positive pathogenic bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae. Moreover, our findings are fully consistent with recent investigations concerning the regulatory impact of TCDS on gene pairs in eukaryots underpinning the broad applicability of our analysis.

Transcription‐coupled DNA supercoiling in defined protein systems and inE. coli topAmutant strains

Transcription by RNA polymerases can stimulate (-) DNA supercoiling both in vitro and in Escherichia coli topA strains. This phenomenon has been successfully explained by a "twin-supercoiled-domain" model of transcription in which (+) supercoils are produced in front of the transcribing RNA polymerase and (-) supercoils behind it. Previously, it has been shown that certain sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins potently stimulate transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) in an in vitro protein system. These results are consistent with a topological barrier model where certain nucleoprotein complexes can form topological barriers that impede the diffusion and merger of independent chromosomal supercoil domains. Indeed, recent biochemical and single-molecule results demonstrated the existence of nucleoprotein-based DNA topological barriers, which are capable of dividing a DNA molecule into different topological domains. Additionally, recent in vivo studies showed that a transcriptional ensemble (including the transcribing RNA polymerase and the RNA transcript) alone is sufficient to cause a change in local DNA superhelicity. This topological change in local chromosome structure should have a great impact on the conformation and function of critical DNA sequence elements, such as promoters and DNA replication origins. In this article, we will also review recent progress by which TCDS is a critical stimulating force to activate transcription initiation from weak promoters, such as the Salmonella typhimurium leu-500 promoter.

Dependence of transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling on promoter strength in Escherichia coli topoisomerase I deficient strains

Transcription by RNA polymerase can induce the formation of hypernegatively supercoiled DNA in vitro and in vivo. This phenomenon has been nicely explained by a “twin-supercoiled-domain” model of transcription where a positively supercoiled domain is generated ahead of the RNA polymerase and a negatively supercoiled domain behind it. In Escherichia coli topA strains, DNA gyrase selectively converts the positively supercoiled domain into negative supercoils to produce hypernegatively supercoiled DNA. In this article, in order to examine whether promoter strength affects transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS), we developed a two-plasmid system in which a linear, non-supercoiled plasmid was used to express lac repressor constitutively while a circular plasmid was used to gage TCDS in E. coli cells. Using this two-plasmid system, we found that TCDS in topA strains is dependent on promoter strength. We also demonstrated that transcription-coupled hypernegative supercoiling of plasmid DNA did not need the expression of a membrane-insertion protein for strong promoters; however, it might require co-transcriptional synthesis of a polypeptide. Furthermore, we found that for weak promoters the expression of a membrane-insertion tet gene was not sufficient for the production of hypernegatively supercoiled DNA. Our results can be explained by the “twin-supercoiled-domain” model of transcription where the friction force applied to E. coli RNA polymerase plays a critical role in the generation of hypernegatively supercoiled DNA.

Transcription-coupled Hypernegative Supercoiling of Plasmid DNA by T7 RNA Polymerase in Escherichia coli Topoisomerase I-Deficient Strains

Transcription by RNA polymerase can stimulate negative DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli topA strains. This phenomenon has been explained by a “twin-supercoiled-domain” model of transcription in which positive DNA supercoils are generated in front of a translocating RNA polymerase and negative supercoils behind it. However, since there is lack of a specific system to study the factors governing this biologically important process, the parameters regulating transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) in E.coli still remain elusive. Here, we describe our efforts to study TCDS in E.coli using a newly developed system. This system consists of a topA strain, VS111(DE3) or DM800(DE3), in which a λDE3 prophage containing a T7 RNA polymerase gene under the control of lacUV5 promoter has been integrated into the cell chromosome, along with a set of plasmids producing RNA transcripts of various lengths by T7 RNA polymerase. Using this system, we found that transcription by T7 RNA polymerase strikingly induced the formation of hypernegatively supercoiled plasmid DNA. We also discovered, for the first time, that TCDS was dependent on the length of RNA transcripts in vivo, precisely predicted by the twin-supercoiled-domain model of transcription. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that hypernegative supercoiling of plasmid DNA by T7 RNA polymerase did not require anchoring of DNA to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. These results indicate that a transcribing RNA polymerase alone is sufficient to cause a change in local DNA superhelicity, which can have a powerful impact on the conformation and function of critical DNA sequence elements such as promoters and DNA replication origins.

Coupling DNA Supercoiling to Transcription in Defined Protein Systems

Transcription of closed circular DNA templates in the presence of DNA gyrase is known to stimulate negative DNA supercoiling both in vivo and in vitro. It has proven elusive, however, to establish a general system in vitro that supports transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling (TCDS) by the "twin-domain" mechanism (Liu, L. F. and Wang, J. C. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7024-7027) that operates in bacteria. In this report, we examine the properties of TCDS in defined protein systems that minimally contained T7 RNA polymerase and DNA gyrase. Specifically designed plasmid DNA templates permitted us to control the location and length of RNA transcripts. We demonstrate that TCDS takes place by two separate, and apparently independent, mechanistic pathways in vitro. The first supercoiling pathway, which is not likely to be significant in vivo, was found to be dependent on R-loop formation and could be suppressed by the presence of RNase H or bacterial HU protein. The second pathway for TCDS was much more potent, but became predominant in vitro only when sequence-specific DNA-bending proteins were present during transcription, and RNA transcript lengths exceeded 3 kb. This major supercoiling route was shown to be resistant to RNase H and had functional properties consistent with those predicted for the twin-domain mechanism. For example, DNA supercoiling activity was proportional to RNA transcript length and was greatly stimulated by macromolecular crowding agents. Under optimal conditions, the twin domain pathway of TCDS rapidly and efficiently generated superhelicity levels more than twice that typically found in vivo.

Potent stimulation of transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling by sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins.

Transcription by RNA polymerase can stimulate localized DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli. In vivo, there is extensive experimental support for a "twin-domain" model in which positive DNA supercoils are generated ahead of a translocating RNA polymerase complex and negative supercoils are formed behind it. Negative supercoils accumulate in the template DNA because the positive supercoils are preferentially removed by cellular topoisomerase action. Yet, in vitro, clear and convincing support for the twin-domain mechanism has been lacking. In this article, we reconcile this inconsistency by showing that, in a defined in vitro system with plasmid DNA templates, a variety of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, such as the bacteriophage lambda O replication initiator or the E. coli lactose or galactose repressors, strikingly stimulate transcription-coupled DNA supercoiling. We demonstrate further that this stimulation requires the presence in the DNA template of a recognition sequence for the relevant DNA-binding protein and depends on the production of long RNA chains by an RNA polymerase. Our data are most consistent with a model in which specific DNA-binding proteins facilitate a twin-domain mechanism to enhance DNA supercoiling during transcription. More precisely, we suggest that some nucleoprotein complexes, perhaps those that contain sharply bent DNA, can form barriers that impede the diffusion and merger of independent chromosomal supercoil domains. Localization of DNA supercoils by nucleoprotein complexes may serve as a general mechanism for modulating DNA transactions that are sensitive to DNA superhelicity.