Transcervical Foley Catheter Research Articles

A comparison of transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in a tertiary hospital in North-Central Nigeria

A comparison of transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in a tertiary hospital in North-Central Nigeria

Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial

BackgroundInduction of labor (IOL) with mechanical methods or pharmacological agents is used in about 20% to 30% of all pregnant women. We specialized in comparing the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone vs transcervical Foley catheter for IOL in term pregnant women with an unfavorable cervix with adequate samples. ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone vs transcervical Foley catheter for IOL in term pregnant women with an unfavorable cervix. Study DesignThis is a parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial in two maternal centers in Shanghai, China between October 2019 and July 2022. Women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at term and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <6) scheduled for IOL were eligible. A total of 1860 women were randomly allocated to cervical ripening with either a dinoprostone vaginal insert (10 mg) or a 60 cc Foley catheter for up to 24 hours. The primary outcomes were vaginal delivery rate and time to vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes included time to delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Analysis was done from an intention-to-treat perspective. The trial was registered with the China trial registry (CTR2000038435). ResultsThe vaginal birth rates were 72.8% (677/930) vs 69.9% (650/930) in vaginal dinoprostone and Foley catheter, respectively (aRR 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.10, risk difference: 0.03). Time to vaginal delivery was not significantly different between the two groups (sub-distribution hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.24). Vaginal dinoprostone was more likely complicated with hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes (5.8% vs 2.8%, aRR 2.09, 95% CI 1.32-3.31) and placenta abruption (0.9% vs 0.1%, aRR: 8.04, 95% CI 1.01-64.15), while Foley catheter was more likely complicated with suspected intrapartum infection (5.1% vs 8.2%, aRR: 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.88) and postpartum infection (1.4% vs 3.7%, aRR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72). The composite of poor neonatal outcomes was not significantly different between the two groups (4.5% vs 3.8%, aRR 1.21, 95% CI 0.78-1.88), while more neonatal asphyxia occurred in the dinoprostone group (1.2% vs 0.2%, aRR 5.39, 95% CI 1.22-23.92). In a subgroup analysis, vaginal dinoprostone decreased vaginal birth rate slightly in multiparous women (90.6% vs 97.0%, aRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99). ConclusionsIn term pregnant women with an unfavorable cervix, IOL with vaginal dinoprostone or Foley catheter has similar effectiveness. Foley catheter leads to better safety for neonates, while it may result in a higher risk of maternal infection. Furthermore, Foley catheter should be preferred in multiparous women.

Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial

BackgroundIncreased use of labor induction has renewed interest in outpatient cervical ripening. Post-term pregnancy (i.e., ≥41 weeks) is a specific situation of increased neonatal risk, including greater risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes. While a high proportion of these patients will need induction, outpatient management of this specific population has never been studied. Therefore, our objective was to compare two policies of management of post term pregnancies: the use of a transcervical Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening compared with expectant management. MethodsMulticenter, randomized controlled open-label study comparing home induction with a Foley catheter versus expectant management. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous, live singleton fetus in a vertex position, post-term (at 41 + 4 days), requiring cervical ripening (Bishop score <6), intact membranes, and distance home-hospital within 40 min. The primary endpoint was change in Bishop score beetween randomization (41 + 4 days) and consultation (41 + 5 days). ResultsForty-five women were included: 21 in the home induction group and 24 in the control group. The study was stopped due to low recruitment. The difference in Bishop score increases one day after randomization approached significance (p = 0.055), with home induction showing a larger change compared with expectant management (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI] −0.002 to 1.21). Regarding change in Bishop score, 81 % of home induction group patients had a better score at 41 + 5 days versus 52.2 % in the control group (relative risk = 1.55; 95 %CI 0.99 to 2.15). ConclusionBy specifically evaluating home induction in nulliparous women with post term pregnancies, we observed a Bishop score improvement in the home induction group. These data support further evaluation of induction methods and birth experiences in a larger cohort of this population. Trial registrationThe study was registered under European policy (number EudraCT 2015-A01298–41) and on www.clinitrials.gov (number NCT02932319). Date of registration: 13/10/2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: 31/03/2017

Comparison of digital and speculum-guided methods of transcervical Foley catheter insertion in primigravida undergoing cervical ripening at term gestation: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial

BackgroundFoley catheter insertion is frequently utilized for cervical ripening during the induction of labour. However, the insertion failure, safety, maternal side effects, complications and satisfaction of digital compared to speculum-guided Foley catheter placement have not been evaluated in a large trial involving primigravida. ObjectivesThe study aimed to compare the insertion failure rate of digital and speculum-based transcervical Foley catheter placement in primigravida. The co-primary outcome was insertion-associated pain. The secondary outcomes were time required for successful insertion, maternal satisfaction, and maternal complications within 24 hours of Foley insertion. MethodsThis randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, non-inferiority clinical trial was performed in a large tertiary care university hospital. Primigravida >18 years of age with term gestation (≥37 weeks) were included in this study. Additional inclusion criteria for enrolment in this study were singleton pregnancy with a cephalic presentation, intact membrane, Bishop score ≤5 and reassuring pre-induction foetal heart rate tracing. All women planned for cervical ripening were assessed for eligibility and were randomized into digital or speculum arms. Foley catheter insertion was performed in a supine lithotomy position. Vaginal and cervical cleaning were performed before insertion. A 22-French Foley balloon catheter was guided digitally or via speculum to position the bulb at the level of the internal os using water-soluble lubricant. Insertion-associated pain was measured using visual numeric rating scale (VNRS) and maternal satisfaction was assessed using a set of questions. Results469 pregnant women were assessed for eligibility, and 446 patients were enrolled and randomized. The median age of the parturients was 24 (19-40) and 24 (18-38) years, respectively. The body mass index, gestational age at randomization, incidence of post-dated pregnancy and pre-randomization Bishop scores were comparable. Insertion failure was observed in 24 (10.8%) and 17 (7.6%) of women in digital and speculum arm, respectively (RR= 1.41; 95% CI, 0.78-2.55; P=0.25). Requirements of more than one attempt (5.4% vs 3.6%) followed by change in hands (3.6% vs 2.7%) were the most common reasons for insertion failure. The median (interquartile range) VNRS was comparable (6.00 (2-9) vs 5.00 (2-10); p=0.15). The time taken for successful insertion was similar (58 (12-241) vs 54 (10-281); p=0.30). 9.4% and 10.8% of women required additional methods of cervical ripening. More women in the speculum group (41.7% vs 33.2%; P=0.06) felt a medium level of discomfort than digital group. ConclusionInsertion failure and insertion-related pain in the digital approach were comparable to the speculum-guided approach for transcervical Foley catheter insertion in primigravida for cervical ripening. Nevertheless, maternal satisfaction was higher in the digital group due to a lesser level of discomfort.

83 Application of Tension on Transcervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Term Nulliparous Women

83 Application of Tension on Transcervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Term Nulliparous Women

Combination Foley Catheter-Oxytocin versus Oxytocin Alone following Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.

The benefit of mechanical ripening agents following preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) has not been established. We sought to compare the time to delivery in women who received transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin infusion versus oxytocin infusion alone in patients with unfavorable cervices and PPROM. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with PPROM of a live, singleton gestation between 240/7 and 366/7 weeks' gestation from January 2005 to October 2018 at a single, tertiary care institution. Patients with an unfavorable cervical examination (≤2-cm dilation), no contraindication to labor and undergoing labor induction were analyzed. Time to delivery was analyzed using multivariable linear regression adjusting for cervical dilation at induction and nulliparity. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used where appropriate. A total of 260 participants were included: 109 who received a Foley catheter and oxytocin (Foley/oxytocin) and 151 who had oxytocin alone. Demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Unadjusted time to delivery was significantly shorter in the oxytocin only group (Foley/oxytocin: 20.35 hours vs. oxytocin alone: 14.7 hours, p < 0.001). No differences in length of labor were detected after adjusting for cervical dilation at induction and nulliparity (p = 0.5). The unadjusted rate of cesarean delivery was higher in the combination Foley/oxytocin group (Foley/oxytocin: 16.5% vs. oxytocin alone: 7.3%, p = 0.03), but no differences were found in the adjusted analysis (p = 0.06). There were no differences in clinical chorioamnionitis rates between the two groups (Foley/oxytocin: 8.3% vs. oxytocin alone: 9.3%, p = 0.83). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. In patients with PROM, the use of a transcervical Foley catheter in addition to oxytocin is not associated with a shorter time to delivery compared with oxytocin alone. · Transcervical Foley catheter did not shorten length of labor in PPROM.. · Transcervical Foley catheter did not increase infection risk.. · Pitocin alone can be used in PPROM population..

Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section

Induction of labor may be necessary in around twenty-five to thirty percent of a woman's subsequent pregnancies when she has already given birth through cesarean section. During our research, the objective had been to ascertain the rate of spontaneous vaginal birth, rate of cesarean section, and rate of complications that followed the induction of labor with transcervical foley catheter in females who had previously had 1 cesarean section. This retrospective cohort trial was performed in the largest city in Palestine at a tertiary teaching hospital. In subsequent pregnancy, pregnant cases with a history of a prior CS delivery (n = 306) underwent labor induction at term with a Foley catheter. Women who underwent labor induction with transcervical foley catheter at Al-Ahli Hospital in Hebron, Palestine. From April 2017 until March 2020. Our research revealed that 46.7 percent of women had spontaneous vaginal births, 14.4 percent had assisted vaginal births, and one woman experienced uterine rupture. The frequency of postpartum hemorrhage is 30 percent, the most prevalent complication. 10 percent and 5 percent of mothers experienced intrapartum and postpartum infections, correspondingly. 5% of newborns had a confirmed infection, and there was one perinatal fatality related to uterine rupture.

Patient Pain and Satisfaction With 10, 30, and 70 mL Transcervical Foley Balloons for Cervical Ripening During Induction of Labor.

Objective To assess patient pain and satisfaction and time to delivery following transcervical Foley catheter balloon inflation to 10, 30, or 70 mL with simultaneous administration of oxytocin. Methods We performed a randomized prospective study with 30 or 70 mL transcervical Foley balloon catheters in combination with oxytocin during labor induction at term. A 10 mL group was included as a sham control group. Time to delivery was measured, and a patient questionnaire was administered at the time the catheter was expelled to determine patient pain and satisfaction. Results In 120 enrolled patients, there was a non-significant trend towardreduced time to delivery in the large Foley balloon group (10 mL: 30:45 ± 38:53, 30 mL: 26:41 ± 20:53, and 70 mL 22:40 ± 15:35, hh:mm, P = 0.412). The pain score at the time the balloon was expelled was significantly higher in the 70 ml group compared to the 10 ml and 30 ml groups (P = 0.004 and P = 0.034, respectively). We found no other differences in patient satisfaction or pain scores at the time of placement of the Foley catheter for the three groups. Conclusion Small gains in time to delivery should be balanced against patient experiences, and expectations of pain during the ripening process should be addressed at the time of Foley insertion.

Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial

Induction of labor is a common intervention in obstetrics worldwide. Foley catheter is a commonly used mechanical method for labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at term. We hypothesize that a higher volume of Foley catheter (80 mL vs 60 mL) will shorten the induction-delivery interval for labor induction in nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix with simultaneous use of vaginal misoprostol. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcervical Foley catheter (80 mL vs 60 mL) with simultaneous use of vaginal misoprostol on the induction-delivery interval in nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix for induction of labor. In this double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial, nulliparous women with a term singleton gestation with unfavorable cervix were randomized to either group 1 (Foley catheter [80 mL] simultaneously with vaginal misoprostol 25 µg every 4h) or group 2 (Foley catheter [60 mL] with vaginal misoprostol 25 µg every 4h). The primary outcome was induction-delivery interval. Secondary outcomes were duration of the latent phase of labor, number of doses of vaginal misoprostol required, mode of delivery, as well as maternal and neonatal morbidity. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat method. A sample size of 100 women per group (N=200) was selected. Between September 2021 to September 2022, 200 nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix were randomized to labor induction with either FC (80 mL vs 60 mL) and vaginal misoprostol. Induction delivery interval (in minutes) was statistically significantly shorter in Foley catheter (80 mL) (median [interquartile range], 604 [524-719] vs 846 [596-990]; [P<.001]). Median time to labor onset (in minutes) (240 [120-300] vs 360 [180-600]; P<.001) was also shorter in group 1 (80 mL). The number of doses of misoprostol required for labor induction was statistically significantly less than with 80 mL (mean±standard deviation, 1.4±0.7 vs 2.4±1.3; P<.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mode of delivery (vaginal delivery: 69 vs 80; odds ratio, 0.55 [1.1-0.3]; P=.104 and cesarean delivery: 29 vs 17; odds ratio, 0.99 [0.9-1.1]; P=.063, respectively). The relative risk of delivery within 12 hours with 80 mL was 2.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.68-3.43], P<.001. Maternal and neonatal morbidity were similar across the 2 groups. FC (80 mL) simultaneously with vaginal misoprostol significantly shortens the induction-delivery interval (P<.001) in nulliparous women at term with an unfavorable cervix, as compared with Foley catheter 60 mL and vaginal misoprostol.

Infectious morbidity among group B streptococcus carriers undergoing cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter

Infectious morbidity among group B streptococcus carriers undergoing cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter

A randomized controlled trial comparing combined medical and mechanical method for early mid-trimester abortion (13-20 weeks).

To examine the combined effect of a medical and mechanical method on induction-to-abortion interval (IAI) in women undergoing early mid-trimester abortion (MTA) (13-20 weeks of pregnancy). A randomized controlled trial was conducted among women undergoing MTA. Primary outcome was IAI. At enrollment, 60 women were randomized (group 1: medical method alone [mifepristone 200 mg, then 48 h later vaginal misoprostol 400 μg every 4h] versus group 2: combined medical and mechanical method [transcervical Foley catheter inflated with 60 ml of normal saline]). Demographic and clinical data were collected at enrollment and abortion. Women in group 2 had statistically significantly shorter IAI (mean ± standard deviation: 347 ± 130 min vs. 640 ± 242 min, for group 2 and group 1, respectively; P< 0.001). All the women in group 2 had complete abortion within 12 h, compared with 19 (63%) in group 1 (P< 0.001). Median number of doses of vaginal misoprostol (400 μg every 4h) required in group 1 was 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-5) versus 1 (IQR 1-3) in group 2 (P< 0.001). Statistically significantly fewer women required additional oxytocin (group 1 vs. group 2; 4 vs. zero, respectively, P= 0.038). All women in the study had complete abortion. There was no significant difference with respect to maternal complications. A combined medical and mechanical method significantly shortens the IAI (P< 0.001) in women undergoing early MTA (13-20 weeks of pregnancy). Clinical Trial Registry of India www.ctri.nic.in CTRI/2020/12/030077 (date; 28-12-2020).

Comparison of Efficacy of Trans-Cervical Foleys Catheter and PGE2 Gel for Induction of Labour

Background: Induction of labour is initiation of uterine contractions before the onset in order to vaginally deliver the fetoplacental unit. Common reasons for induction of labour (IOL) are post-term and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Many women who undergo induction do not have a favourable cervix, so some methods of cervical ripening either pharmaceutical or mechanical are used. Aim &amp; Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the transcervical Foley catheter and the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel for the induction of labour. Methodology: The clinical trial was conducted for a period of two years OBGY department of Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune. 196 pregnant women which included and randomly via block randomization divided into two groups. Group A had 98 women in whom the transcervical Foley catheter was inserted and Group B included 98 women in whom the PGE2 gel was inserted vaginally for IOL. Bishop’s score and duration from induction to onset of labour was calculated. Data analysis was done and appropriate statistical tests were used. Results: In Group A (37.8%) as well as in Group B (41.8%) most of the pregnancies were primigravida. The most common indication for induction in both groups was postdatism. The adjuvant therapy was required in 66.3% and 54.1% of women in Group A &amp; B respectively. Significant higher median values were observed in Bishop’s score at 12 hours as compared to 0 hour in both the groups. No significant association was observed between mode of induction and need of adjuvant therapy and induction to onset hours in both groups. Conclusion: The study shows that both Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel are equally effective in pre induction cervical ripening.

Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation—a randomized study

BACKGROUNDThe ideal method for induction of labor is still not clearly defined. Recent reports in literature have shown that oral administration of low-dose misoprostol is as effective as vaginal administration for induction of labor. The use of vaginal misoprostol in combination with Foley catheter has been shown to shorten the period of induction. However, there are limited reports on the use of oral misoprostol in combination with Foley catheter. Given the convenience of oral administration, improved compliance relative to other methods is probable. This study proposed that the combination of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter would be a better means of inducing labor.OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with oral misoprostol alone for induction of labor at term gestation. The efficacy was compared in terms of the induction-to-delivery interval and the number of women delivering vaginally within 24 hours. The second objective was to document adverse events, if any, of the 2 protocols.STUDY DESIGNThe study was conducted at a tertiary care center and included 200 patients with indication for induction, randomly allotted to either of the 2 groups: group A (a combination of Foley catheter and 25-µg misoprostol every 2 hours orally) and group B (only 25-µg misoprostol every 2 hours orally), using computer-generated random number sequence. The obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Quantitative variables were compared using unpaired and paired t-tests within the groups across follow-ups.RESULTSGroup A had significantly shorter mean induction-to-active-labor interval (10.67±1.75 vs 16.28±1.69 hours), mean induction-to-full-dilation interval (11.49 vs 19.00 hours), and mean induction-to-delivery interval (16.85 vs 21.90 hours). The proportion of women delivering vaginally within 24 hours was higher in group A (76 vs 57 women). In comparing maternal side effects, the only significant difference between the 2 groups was found in postpartum hemorrhage. A 5-minute Apgar score <7 was significantly more frequent in group B.CONCLUSIONThe combination of oral misoprostol with transcervical Foley catheter reduced the induction-to-delivery interval significantly (P=.001). In addition, the proportion of women delivering vaginally within 24 hours was significantly higher. Hence, the use of oral misoprostol with Foley catheter for induction of labor would be beneficial for patients.

Patient satisfaction during outpatient versus inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor

Several recent meta-analyses have demonstrated both the safety and efficacy of the Foley catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening for induction of labor (IOL). Studies suggest that outpatient cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter is safe. This objective of this study is to compare patient satisfaction between outpatient versus inpatient induction of labor with Foley catheter.

Inpatient versus outpatient transcervical Foley catheter use for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

To evaluate the difference in time from hospital admission to delivery when undergoing inpatient versus outpatient cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter. This was a randomized controlled trial of patients with singleton pregnancies, Bishop Score ≤ 6 and at least 37 weeks’ gestation, undergoing labor induction at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Patients were randomized to outpatient or inpatient cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. Inpatients received concurrent oxytocin. Outpatients returned 12 hours after Foley placement, and on arrival oxytocin was initiated if the balloon was still in place. Foleys were removed if in place after 12-18 hours, and labor induction initiated with oxytocin as needed. The primary outcome was the difference in time from admission to delivery. A maternal satisfaction survey was also administered. Unpaired t-tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher’s exact test were performed to estimate differences in outcomes between the inpatient and outpatient arms of the study. Enrollment commenced January 2016 and continued until November 2020, after randomizing 30 patients (n=15 per group). The study was terminated prematurely due to low enrollment and temporary suspension during COVID-19. There was no significant difference in time from admission to delivery between outpatient and inpatient groups (14.5 ± 6.1 versus 18.9 ± 8.2 hours, P=.11). The total induction time was shorter for the inpatient group (24.9 ± 6.8 versus 17.3 ± 9.4 hours, P=.02). There were no differences in other maternal or neonatal outcomes (P>.05). Maternal satisfaction was similar between groups on a 1-10 scale (8.6 ± 1.7 versus 8.9 ± 1.0, P=.53), and all patients felt safe. No difference in the primary outcome of time from admission to delivery was noted between inpatient and outpatient cervical ripening with a Foley catheter; however, this may be a result of inadequate power related to early termination. Consistent with past studies, outpatient balloon cervical ripening appears to be safe, and overall satisfaction was high.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Combined Use of Vaginal Misoprostol with Intracervical Foley Catheter Versus Vaginal Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labor at Term Pregnancy

Abstract Background Induction of labor should be used in the most efficient way possible that will result in a favorable obstetric outcome with minimum fetal morbidity. Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol alone versus intra cervical Foley catheter combined with vaginal misoprostol in induction of labor at term pregnancy. Methods This study was conducted at Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology Department; Ain Shams University, Maternity Hospital in the period between May 2017 to October 2017. The total number of patients studied was 120 patients, divided into two groups; the first group (A) included 60 patients who received vaginal misoprostol, the second group (B) included 60 patients who received vaginal misoprostol combined with trans cervical Foley catheter. Results The current study found that the combined group has a better chance for NVD 88.3% versus 78.3% in misoprostol alone group, a lesser probability to CS 11.7% in combined group versus 21.7% in misoprostol alone group and a shorter induction delivery interval within 12 hours after induction (81.6% in combined group versus 59.5% in misoprostol group). Regarding the effect of both methods on fetal safety, we found that non reassuring FHR was more common in combined group 8.3% than misoprostol alone group 1.7% but it’s statistically non-significant. There was statistically significant increase in tachysystole in combined group 28.3% versus 13.3% in misoprostol alone group. However, dystocia was more common in misoprostol group 15% than combined group 3.3% that is also statistically significant. Conclusion Both methods can be used in induction of labor at term pregnancy without forgetting the precautions and close observation to the mother and the fetus. Combined method results in a shorter induction-to delivery time, but misoprostol alone was safer for the mother and the fetus.

Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction in Late Pregnancy

Background: Induction of labor is its intentional initiation before spontaneous onset, with the aim of vaginal birth which is safe for mother and newborn. The well documented effectiveness of misoprostol in several gynecological and obstetric applications has resulted in enthusiasm for its use. Objective: To see the efficacy and safety vaginal Misoprostal for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy. Materials and Methods: This single center clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital in Sirajgonj, Bangladesh from June 2019 to May 2020 for a period of one year. A total of 90 women requiring indicated induction of labour with an unfavourable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 4) were included in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups: 53 women induced with intravaginal misoprostol (Group I) and 37 women induced with transcervical Foley catheter (Group II). Results: Spontaneous vaginal delivery was 35(66.0%) in misoprostol group and 15(40.5%) in Foley catheter group. Caesarean section was higher in Foley catheter group than misoprostol group (37.8% vs 18.9%). The mean birth weight, APGAR score 1 minute, 5 minute, admission in neonatal intensive care unit and meconium aspiration syndrome were not statistically significant between two groups (p&gt;0.05). Only one baby was died in Foley catheter group, but the difference was not statistically significant between two groups (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: The present study suggests intravaginal Misoprostol results in a shorter induction to delivery time, a reduction in the rate of caesarean delivery. KYAMC Journal.2021;12(02): 78-83

Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.

Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.

Transcervical foley catheter and oxytocin compared with transcervical foley catheter alone for induction of labour

Objective: To evaluate whether transcervical Foley catheter with Oxytocin used concurrently for induction of labour (IOL) increases the delivery rate within 24 hours as compared to transcervical Foley catheter alone. Methodology: 220 women with Bishop score ≤6 undergoing IOL were randomized into a concurrent transcervical Foley catheter &amp; Oxytocin group and a transcervical Foley catheter alone group and delivery rate ≤24 hours was assessed as primary outcome. Results: Of the 220 women who completed the trial, there were 110 subjects (52 nulliparae and 58 multiparae) randomized in each group. Delivery rate within 24 hours was &gt; 95% in both groups (96.36% vs 95.45%, p=0.748). Oxytocin use was significantly longer in the concurrent group than in Foley alone group (10.50 vs 7.75 hours). Multiparae fared better than nulliparae in both the groups in terms of parameters like delivery rate within 24 hours (concurrent group: 100 vs 92.30%, p=0.046; &amp; Foley only group: 98.27 vs 94.23%, p=0.342), delivery in 12 hours, caesarean sections, Foley expulsion time, oxytocin required and successful inductions. They also delivered much faster (combined group: 9 vs 12 hours; Foley only group: 9.41 vs 12.5 hours). Conclusion: Both methods- combined and Foley catheter alone is equally good for IOL. Concurrent use of oxytocin at the initiation of IOL exposes to a longer duration of oxytocin without expediting the induction thereby questioning oxytocin’s efficacy on the unprimed cervix. Thus concurrent methods (Foley &amp; Oxytocin)) offers no extra advantage over the conventional methods (Foley alone) for IOL.

Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and the Risk for Infection After Cervical Ripening With a Transcervical Foley Catheter.

Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and the Risk for Infection After Cervical Ripening With a Transcervical Foley Catheter.