Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Group Research Articles

Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation vs. transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatic hemangiomas.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of large hepatic hemangiomas (LHH) (5-9.9 cm in diameter). This study retrospectively collected data from 82 patients with LHH treated at Chaoyang Central Hospital. The study analyzed the differences in postoperative efficacy, operative time, blood routine, liver and kidney function on the first day after surgery, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative complications. There were statistically significant differences in indicators such as white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin on the first day after surgery between the RFA group (39 cases) and the TACE group (43 cases) (P < 0.001). Compared to RFA, LHH patients treated with TACE had a general complication rate of 39.5% (vs. 43.6%; P = 0.7), a procedure-related complication rate of 30.2% (vs. 59.0%; P = 0.009), an effective rate at 6-12 months postoperatively of 55.8% (vs. 82.1%; P = 0.01), an operating-time of 41.2 ± 14.9 min (vs. 100.8 ± 35.5 min; P < 0.001) and hospitalization costs of 17052.7 ± 1364.8 yuan (vs. 30952.1 ± 4327.6 yuan; P < 0.001). This study indicates that the efficacy of RFA in treating LHH is significantly superior to TACE. Microwave ablation and RFA appear to be safe treatments for LHH. The TACE group exhibited shorter operating-time, lower hospitalization costs and lower demands on cardiopulmonary function.

Impact of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on postoperative long-term survival in patients with nonsmall hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundThe purpose of this propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was to compare the effects of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and non-TACE on the long-term survival of patients who undergo radical hepatectomy.MethodsPSM analysis was performed for 387 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (single > 3 cm or multiple) who underwent radical resection of HCC at our centre from January 2011 to June 2018. The patients were allocated to a preoperative TACE group (n = 77) and a non-TACE group (n = 310). The main outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since the treatment date.ResultsAfter PSM, 67 patients were included in each of the TACE and non-TACE groups. The median PFS times in the preoperative TACE and non-TACE groups were 24.0 and 11.3 months, respectively (p = 0.0117). The median OS times in the preoperative TACE and non-TACE groups were 41.5 and 29.0 months, respectively (p = 0.0114). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that preoperative TACE (hazard ratio, 1.733; 95% CI, 1.168–2.570) and tumour thrombosis (hazard ratio, 0.323; 95% CI, 0.141–0.742) were independent risk factors significantly associated with OS.ConclusionsPreoperative TACE is related to improving PFS and OS after resection of HCC. Preoperative TACE and tumour thrombus volume were also found to be independent risk factors associated with OS.

Recombinant human adenovirus p53 combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for liver cancer: A meta-analysis.

To compare the clinical curative effects, survival and complications of recombinant human adenovirus-p53 (rAd-p53) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus TACE for the treatment of liver cancer. We searched all the eligible studies of rAd-p53 plus TACE versus control group had only TACE in the treatment of liver cancer, which were retrieved from CNKI, Wanfang database, CBM, VIP, PubMed, EMBase, The Chrance of Library, Web of Science from its inception to august 2022. A total of 17 studies were included, which involved 1045 patients. The results of the meta analysis indicated that the the rAd-p53combined with TACE markedly improved the patients' complete remission(OR = 2.19, 95% CI:1.13-4.22, P = 0.02), partial remission (OR = 2.22, 95% CI:1.67-2.94, P<0.00001), objective tumor response rate (OR = 2.58, 95% CI:1.95-3.41, P<0.00001) and disease control rate(OR = 2.39, 95% CI:1.65-3.47, P<0.00001) compared with TACE alone. And our results showed that rAd-p53combined with TACE had better survival benefit [6-month OS (OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.62-7.14, p = 0.001); 1-year OS (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.28-2.96, p = 0.002)] and better quality of life(MD = 5.84, 95% CI:2.09-9.60, P = 0.002). In addition, the immunity of the patients was enhanced by the combination therapy, as demonstrated by the increase in the ratio of CD4+ to CD4+/CD8+. In adverse effects, except for fever in the TACE combined with rAd-p53 group, which was higher than that in the TACE group(OR = 2.62, 95% CI:2.02-3.49, P<0.00001), all other adverse effects were lower in the TACE combined with rAd-p53 group than in the TACE group. RAd-p53 combined with TACE for liver cancer showed significant advantages in terms of clinical efficacy, survival rate, and safety compared to the TACE alone, and effectively improved patient quality of life and immune function. https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0127/.

Impact of anticancer drugs on the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of hepatic arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using various anticancer drugs is often performed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of TACE with anticancer drugs versus transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) without anticancer drugs for HCC. Patients with HCC were randomized to either the TACE or TAE group. Up to five target nodules were treated in each patient. Lipiodol (Lp; 10 mL), contrast media (CM; 10 mL), epirubicin (40 mg), mitomycin C (10 mg), miliplatin (70 mg), and 1-2-mm 2-day soluble gelatin sponge particles (2D-SGS) were injected into the TACE group, whereas Lp (10 mL), CM (10 mL), and 2D-SGS were injected into the TAE group. Treatment effect (TE) of the target nodules was graded (TE1-TE4) and patient responses were assessed. Three months after treatment, blood tests were performed to compare tumor markers and adverse events. Fifty-four patients and 161 target nodules were included; 75 nodules in 28 patients were treated by TACE, and 86 nodules in 26 patients were treated by TAE. The number of nodules graded TE1, TE2, TE3, and TE4 was 1, 28, 7, and 39, respectively, in the TACE group and 2, 25, 7, and 52, respectively, in the TAE group. The response rates were 89% (25/28) and 73% (19/26) in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in TE, response rates, or blood test results between the two groups. In hepatic arterial embolization for HCC, anticancer drugs did not have any impact on the therapeutic efficacy or side effects at 3 months after embolization.

Combination treatment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion.

This study evaluated the therapeutic effects and toxic reactions of combining transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 82 HCC patients with MVI, among whom 35 were treated with TACE plus IMRT alone, and 47 were treated with the combined therapy of TACE, IMRT, and sorafenib. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were assessed. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups (all P > .05). In the TACE plus IMRT plus sorafenib group, the median PFS was 17.2 months (95% confidence interval, 14.1-19.9), significantly longer than the 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 6.8-11.2) observed in the TACE plus IMRT group (P < .001). Additionally, patients treated with the TACE plus IMRT plus sorafenib showed a longer median OS than those treated with TACE plus IMRT alone (24.1 vs 17.3 months; P < .001). The occurrence rates of grade 1 to 2 hand-foot syndrome, other skin reactions, diarrhea, and hair loss were higher in the TACE plus IMRT plus sorafenib group (all P < .05). There were no grade 4 or higher adverse events in either group. The combination of TACE plus IMRT with sorafenib provided substantial clinical benefits in the treatment of HCC patients with MVI, increasing the tumor response rate and prolonging both PFS and OS. This approach demonstrated a tolerable and manageable safety profile.

TACE-HAIC combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombus: a propensity score matching study.

The long-term survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) is poor. Systemic therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy are widely used in HCC patients with PVTT. This study aims to explore the efficacy of combining systemic therapy with transarterial-based therapy in HCC patients with PVTT. The authors retrospectively reviewed data of HCC patients with PVTT treated with combination therapy (TACE-hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors) or TACE alone in SYSUCC from 2011 to 2020. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and overall response rate were compared. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding bias. A total of 743 HCC patients with PVTT received combination therapy ( n =139) or TACE alone ( n =604). After propensity score matching, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the combination group than in the TACE group [42.1% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001 (response evaluation criteria in solid tumours); 53.7% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001 (modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours)]. The combination group showed significantly better OS than the TACE group (median OS not reached vs. 10.4 months, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival of the combination and TACE groups was 14.8 and 2.3 months ( P < 0.001), respectively. Tumour downstaging followed by salvage liver resection was significantly more common for the combination therapy group than for TACE group (46.3% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001). After salvage liver resection, 31.6% (30/95) and 1.7% (3/179) of the patients achieved a pathological complete response in the combination and TACE groups, respectively ( P < 0.001). The grade 3/4 adverse events rates were similar between the two groups (28.1% vs. 35.9%, P =0.092). Compared with TACE alone, combination therapy was safe enough and resulted in survival benefits. This is a promising treatment option for HCC patients with PVTT.

Rescue therapy for local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison between repeated ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

To compare the therapeutic outcomes of repeated radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as rescue therapy for the treatment of local tumor progression (LTP) after initial RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study evaluated 44 patients who had LTP as initial tumor recurrence after RFA and underwent repeated RFA (n = 23) or TACE (n = 21) for local disease control. Local disease control and overall survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify the independent prognostic factors. The local disease control rate after the first rescue therapy and the number of rescue therapies applied until the last follow-up were also evaluated. Local disease control after rescue therapy for LTP was significantly higher with repeated RFA than with TACE (p < 0.001). Treatment type was a significant factor for local disease control (p < 0.001). The overall survival rates after rescue therapy were not significantly different between the two treatments (p = 0.900). The local disease control rate after the first rescue therapy was significantly higher with RFA than with TACE (78.3% vs 23.8%, p < 0.001). The total number of rescue therapies applied was significantly higher in the TACE group than that in the repeated RFA group (median 3 vs 1, p < 0.001). Repeated RFA as rescue therapy for LTP after initial RFA for HCC was more efficient and had significantly better local disease control than TACE. Even if LTP occurs after initial RFA, it should not be considered a failure of RFA, and repeated RFA should be performed over TACE if possible for more effective local disease control.

Surgical Margin Affects the Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Radical Hepatectomy Followed by Adjuvant TACE.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment in wide- and narrow-margin groups could improve the long-term prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 670 patients with HCC who underwent radical hepatectomy from January 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled, including 397 patients and 273 patients in the wide- and narrow-margin groups. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were compared in the wide-margin and narrow-margin groups with and without adjuvant TACE postoperatively, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match patients between TACE and no TACE groups in a 1:1 ratio. The wide-margin resection was associated with better RFS and OS rates than narrow-margin resection for patients with HCC. Patients with postoperative adjuvant TACE had a better RFS and OS than patients without postoperative adjuvant TACE in the narrow-margin group and reduced the intrahepatic recurrence rate (39.1% vs. 52.6%, P = .036) and the local recurrence rate in the liver (11.2% vs. 21.4%, P = .032). But postoperative adjuvant TACE did not alter recurrence and survival outcomes in the wide-margin group. Similar results were noted after propensity score matching (PSM). The wide-margin resection had better RFS and OS than the narrow-margin resection for patients with HCC. Postoperative adjuvant TACE was associated with reduced recurrence and improved OS after narrow-margin resection, but was not effective in the wide-margin resection.

Survival benefit of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after anatomical hepatectomy

ABSTRACT Background & aims Although anatomical hepatectomy (AH) is widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis is still unsatisfactory. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with HCC after AH. Methods A total of 832 patients were stratified into with adjuvant TACE (443, 53.2%) and without adjuvant TACE group (389, 46.8%) AH. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for confounding factors, and multivariable Cox regression was performed to determine the independent risk factors. Results After PSM, the results showed that the adjuvant TACE group had better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among the patients with tumor recurrence, adjuvant TACE was associated with a high rate of early-stage tumor at recurrence, a lower recurrence rate around the frontal margin and extrahepatic metastases, and a higher rate of receiving curative treatment. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that adjuvant TACE was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.673, P = 0.001) and RFS (HR 0.650, P = 0.001). Conclusions Patients with HCC after AH can benefit from postoperative adjuvant TACE. Therefore, adjuvant TACE should be considered for patients with a high risk of recurrence.

Efficacy and safety of TACE combined with anlotinib compared with TACE alone among patients with intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study.

581 Background: Anlotinib hydrochloride is an oral multi targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, mainly targeting VEGFR1-3, FGFR 1-4 and PDGFR α/β. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the preferred choice for the treatment of intermediate or advanced HCC. Previous studies have proved that antiangiogenic drugs combined with TACE have synergistic effects. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with anlotinib in the treatment of intermediate or advanced liver cancer compared with TACE alone. Methods: This single-center, randomized controlled, phase II study involved 38 HCC patients with BCLC staging B or C and ECOG PS ≤ 1. Enrolled pts were treated with TACE plus anlotinib (12mg, qd, d1-d14, q3w) and TACE alone until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Both PFS and tumor response were assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Results: At the cutoff date of April 2022, 18 pts received TACE combined anlotinib and 20 pts received TACE alone. The median PFS was 11.04 months (95%CI, 7.17-14.92) in combination group and 6.87 months (95%CI, 5.58-8.16) in TACE group (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.92, P=0.022). The median OS has not been reached yet. ORR was 27.8% (95%CI, 9.7%-53.5%) and 30% (95%CI, 11.9%-54.3%) and DCR was 94.4% (95%CI 72.7%-99.9%) and 100% (95%CI 83.2%-100%), respectively, with no statistical difference.The median times of TACE are 2 and 3 respectively.The treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 15 patients (83.3%) and 19 patients (95%). The most common TRAEs were HFSR (61.1%), hypertension (27.8%), thrombocytopenia (11.1%) in combination group and vomiting (35%), upper abdominal liver pain (35%), upper abdomen pain (30%), low fever (10%), fatigue (10%) in TACE group.Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 2 pts (11.1%) in combination group and 1pts (5%) in TACE group. Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with TACE is a safe and effective regimen in the treatment ofpatients with intermediate or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study still needs longer follow-up to evaluate its efficacy more comprehensively. Clinical trial information: NCT04066543 .

The clinical efficacy and safety of TACE combined with apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

The combined treatment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib had beneficial effects on the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the efficacy of this regimen is still controversial and needs further investigation. The clinical records of advanced HCC patients between May 2015 and December 2016 were collected from our hospital. They were categorized into the TACE monotherapy group and the combination of TACE and apatinib group. After propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two treatments. There were 115 HCC patients included in the study. Among them, 53 received TACE monotherapy and 62 were treated with TACE plus apatinib. After PSM analysis, 50 pairs of patients were compared. The DCR of the TACE group was significantly lower than that of the combination of TACE and apatinib group (35 [70%] versus 45 [90%], P < 0.05). The ORR of the TACE group was also significantly lower than that of the combination of TACE and apatinib group (22 [44%] versus 34 [68%], P < 0.05). Patients who received the combined treatment of TACE and apatinib had longer PFS compared with those in the TACE monotherapy group (P < 0.001). Moreover, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and albuminuria were more common in the combination of TACE and apatinib group (P < 0.05), although all adverse events were well tolerated. The combined treatment of TACE and apatinib showed beneficial effects on tumor response, survival outcomes, and tolerance to treatment, which may be used as a routine regimen for advanced HCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as an adjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a high risk of postoperative recurrence.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high rate of postoperative recurrence and lacks an effective treatment to prevent recurrence. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in postoperative adjuvant therapy for HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors. For this multicenter, retrospective study, we recruited 63 HCC patients who received either anlotinib (n=27) or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) (n=36) from six research centers in China between March 2019 and October 2020. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. In this study, the median follow-up time was 25.9 and 26.8 months in the anlotinib and TACE groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the median DFS between the anlotinib [26.8 months, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.8-NE] and TACE groups (20.6 months, 95% CI: 8.4-NE). The 12-month OS rates in the anlotinib and TACE groups were 96.3% and 97.2%, respectively. In the anlotinib group, 19 of 27 patients (70.4%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, with the most common events (≥10%) being hypertension (22.2%) and decreased platelet count (22.2%). The results indicate that anlotinib, as a new, orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has the same efficacy as TACE, and side effects can be well controlled.

Comparison of surgical resection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction and ObjectivesLarge primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high mortality rate and a variety of treatments. Surgery and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) are important treatments. Which could be better remain debatable. The objective of the study is to compare the long-term overall survival of surgical resection (SR) and the use of TACE in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma. Materials and MethodsWe assessed clinical trials through PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2022. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses)guidelines. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were OS after propensity scores matching (PSM) and progression-free survival (PFS). ResultsA total of 14 studies, including 3609 patients, were enrolled in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated a significant improvement in the 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS favoring SR over TACE (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1,60–3.00; OR = 3.47, 95% CI 2.47–4.88; OR = 2.72, 95% CI 2.03–3.64, p < 0.001, random model). The results were consistent across subgroups of tumor size and tumor numbers (p > 0.05). The pooled outcome indicated that 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS after PSM were higher in the SR group than in the TACE group (p < 0.001). ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that among patients with large primary hepatocellular carcinoma, the overall survival rate of patients undergoing surgical resection was higher than that of patients undergoing TACE.

Prognostic efficacy and prognostic factors of TACE plus TKI with ICIs for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a global challenge due to its high morbidity and mortality rates as well as poor response to treatment. Local combined systemic therapy is widely used in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular cancer (uHCC). This retrospective study was to investigate the prognostic effect and prognostic factors of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of uHCC. A retrospective analysis of 171 patients with uHCC was performed in our hospital from April 27, 2015 to October 18, 2021. According to different treatment options, patients were divided into TACE group (n=45), TACE+TKI group (n=76) and TACE+TKI+ICIs group (n=50). In this study, we found that, the median overall survival (mOS) of TACE+TKI+ICIs group was significantly better than TACE+TKI group and TACE group [24.1 (95% CI 15.1-33.1) months vs 14.9 (95% CI 10.7-19.1) months vs 11.4 (95% CI 8.4-14.5) months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% CI 0.47-0.81; P=0.002]. A visible difference in the median progression-free survival (mPFS) interval between the groups was discovered [10.6 (95% CI6.5-14.7) months in TACE+TKI+ICIs group vs. 6.7 (95% CI 5.5-7.9) months in the TACE+TKI group vs. 6 (95% CI 2.3-9.7) months in the TACE group (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53-0.83; P<0.001)]. The objective response rates (ORR) in the TACE group, TACE+TKI group, and TACE+TKI+ICIs group were 31.1%, 35.5%, and 42%, and the disease control rate (DCR) were 51.1%, 65.8%, and 80%. There were no adverse events (AEs) of arthralgia, diarrhea, rash, and pruritus in the TACE group. The incidence of grade 3 AEs (Hypertension) in the TACE+TKI+ICIs group was significantly higher than that in TACE+TKI and TACE groups (28% vs 17.1% vs 6.7%, P=0.024), and secondly, the morbidity of rash and pruritus in the TACE+TKI+ICIs group was apparently higher than that in the TACE+TKI group (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that ECOG-PS 2 (HR=2.064, 95%CI 1.335-3.191, P=0.001), Hepatitis B virus (HR=2.539, 95%CI 1.291-4.993, P=0.007), AFP≥400 ng/ml (HR= 1.72, 95%CI 1.12-2.643, P=0.013), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥2.195 (HR=1.669, 95%CI 1.073-2.597, P=0.023) were independent risk factors for OS in uHCC patients. So, TACE+TKI+ICIs therapy can prolong the OS and improve the prognosis of patients effectively, with a well-characterized safety profile.

Evaluation of short-term effects of drug-loaded microspheres and traditional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced liver cancer.

Liver cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the main method for surgically unresectable liver cancer. In recent years, drug-loaded microspheres have been gradually applied in TACE technology. There are some controversies about the therapeutic effects of drug-loaded microspheres TACE (D-TACE) and traditional TACE. To explore the short-term efficacy of D-TACE and traditional TACE in the treatment of advanced liver cancer. The clinical data of 73 patients with advanced liver cancer admitted to the First and Sixth Medical Centers of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2017 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 15 patients were treated with D-TACE, and 58 patients were treated with traditional TACE. Clinical baseline characteristics, perioperative laboratory indices, postoperative adverse reactions and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. There was no statistical difference between the two groups for the postoperative response: The highest postoperative body temperature of the drug-loaded microsphere group was 38.0 ± 0.9℃ and the postoperative highest body temperature of the traditional TACE group was 38.3 ± 0.7℃ (t = -1.414, P = 0.162). For the 24 h postoperative nausea and vomiting after surgery in terms of scoring and postoperative pain scores, the traditional TACE group was higher than the drug-loaded microsphere group (χ 2 = 14.33, P = 0.014; χ 2 = 32.967, P = 0.000) and the two groups had significant statistical differences. The disease control rate at 3 mo after treatment in the drug-loaded microsphere group was 60% and the disease control rate at 3 mo after treatment in the traditional TACE group was 75.9% (χ 2 = 4.091, P = 0.252). There was no statistical difference between the two groups of data. During the follow-up period, the number of interventional treatments received was once in the drug-loaded microsphere group and the traditional TACE group received an average of 1.48 treatments (χ 2 = 10.444 P = 0.005). There was a statistical difference between the two groups. Compared with traditional TACE, D-TACE may have some advantages in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with a large tumor load in the short term, but the long-term clinical efficacy needs additional follow-up studies. In addition, compared with the traditional group, the patients in the drug-loaded microsphere group had better subjective tolerance and could reduce the number of interventional treatments. Therefore, D-TACE is worthy of clinical promotion.

Should associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy be applied to hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis? A multi-center study

BackgroundIt is unclear whether associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can be performed in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with cirrhosis. We explored the efficacy of ALPPS in HCC patients. MethodsData of 54 patients who underwent ALPPS between August 2014 and July 2020 at three centers were collected. Adverse factors affecting their prognosis were analyzed and subsequently compared with 184 patients who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). ResultsOverall survival rates of the ALPPS group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 70.6%, 38.4%, and 31.7%, respectively; corresponding disease-free survival rates were 50.5%, 22.4%, and 19.2%, respectively. The ALPPS group had a significantly greater long-term survival rate than the TACE group (before propensity score matching, P < 0.001; after propensity score matching, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that multifocal lesions (P = 0.018) and macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.001) were prognostic factors for HCC patients who underwent ALPPS. After the propensity score matching, the multifocal lesions (P = 0.031), macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.003), and treatment type (ALPPS/TACE) (P = 0.026) were the factors adversely affecting the prognosis of HCC patients. ConclusionALPPS was feasible in hepatitis B virus-related HCC patients with cirrhosis and resulted in better survival than TACE.

Conversion Therapy of Large Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Ipsilateral Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus Using Portal Vein Embolization Plus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.

BackgroundThe study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy with portal vein embolization (PVE) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and ipsilateral portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with initially large (≥5 cm) unresectable HCC with ipsilateral PVTT who underwent PVE + TACE at our center between June 2016 and September 2020 (Group A). Clinically equivalent patients from three centers who were receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) + TACE (Group B) were included. The survival times were evaluated and compared between the two therapeutic groups.ResultsIn Group A (n = 33), the median tumor diameter was 14 cm (range, 5–18 cm) and 19 (57.6%) patients underwent radical resection 18–95 days after PVE. Radical liver resection was not performed because of inadequate hypertrophy (n = 11), pulmonary metastasis (n = 1), lack of consent for surgery (n = 1), and the rupture of the HCC (n = 1). There were no patients who underwent radical resection in Group B (n = 64) (P = 0.000). The mean and median overall survival (OS) were 736.5 days and 425.0 days in Group A and 424.5 days and 344.0 days in Group B, respectively. Compared with TKIs + TACE, treatment with PVE + TACE prolonged OS (P = 0.023).ConclusionsThis study shows that conversion therapy was safe and effective in patients with initially large unresectable HCC with ipsilateral PVTT treated with PVE + TACE. Moreover, PVE + TACE conferred more favorable outcomes than treatment with TKIs + TACE.

Gamma knife radiosurgery versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a propensity score matching study

BackgroundThe optimal locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC patients with PVTT.MethodsThis retrospective study included 544 HCC patients with PVTT (GKR, 202; TACE, 342). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis identified 171 matched pairs of patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsBefore PSM, the GKR group exhibited longer median OS (mOS) than the TACE group (17.2 vs. 8.0 months, p < 0.001). We followed the Cheng’s classification for PVTT. In the subgroup analysis, GKR was associated with significantly longer mOS for patients with PVTT II-IV (17.5 vs. 8.7 months, p < 0.001; 17.2 vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.001; 14.5 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.001, respectively) and comparable OS for patients with PVTT I. After PSM, the GKR group had also a longer mOS than the TACE group (15.8 vs. 10.4 months, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the GKR group demonstrated superior mOS for patients with PVTT II-IV (all p < 0.05) and comparable OS for patients with PVTT I.ConclusionsGKR was associated better OS than TACE in HCC patients with PVTT, especially for patients with PVTT II-IV.Clinical Trials RegistrationThe study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry under the registration number ChiCTR2100051057.

Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy plus anti-PD1 versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

BackgroundThe combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than sorafenib or TACE monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) plus monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) versus TACE plus sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC.MethodsPatients with advanced HCC who treated with RT plus anti-PD1 and TACE plus sorafenib were enrolled. Objective response rate (ORR), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and OS were calculated to assess the antitumor response and the treatment-related adverse events to the safety.ResultsBetween January 2018 to March 2021, 37 patients underwent RT plus anti-PD1 and 41 patients underwent TACE plus sorafenib. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The ORR and DCR were significantly higher in the RT + PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group according to RECIST 1.1 (54.05% vs. 12.20%, P < 0.001; 70.27% vs. 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively) and according to mRECIST (56.76% vs. 31.71%, P = 0.039; 70.27% vs. 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively). RT plus anti-PD1 provided significantly better PFS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.30–0.86; P = 0.017) than TACE plus sorafenib. Moreover, patients with RT plus anti-PD1 had significantly higher 3-, 6-, and 9-month OS rates than those with TACE plus sorafenib(97.3% vs. 92.30%, P < 0.001; 91.89% vs. 68.60%, P < 0.001; 75.5% vs. 60.60%, P < 0.001; respectively). The median OS was more favorable 17.4 months for the RT + PD1 group and 11.9 months for the TACE plus sorafenib group. No treatment-related death was observed. Grade 3 or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred significantly less in patients in the RT + PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group (29.7% vs. 75.6%, P < 0.001), and all TRAEs were manageable.ConclusionsIn this real-world study, RT plus anti-PD1 showed significantly promising efficacy and manageable safety than TACE plus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. The study provides evidence on a new therapeutic method in the treatment of advanced HCC.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary liver cancer.

BackgroundTranscatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) intervention in prolonging the long-term survival and prognosis of patients with liver cancer are still controversy compared with the traditional interventional therapy of RFA alone. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy versus RFA alone.MethodsThe related articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Science Direct, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). The Chinese and English search keywords included transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, TACE, radiofrequency ablation, RFA, primary liver cancer, and liver tumor. The five evaluation criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Cochrane RoB 2.0 repeatedly independently evaluated the bias risks involved in the study and cross-checked the results.ResultsA total of 7 articles were included, and the results of bias risk assessment show that 6 articles described the generation of random sequences in detail; There were 3 articles describing allocation concealment in detail; Operator blindness was used in 4 articles; The outcome indicators of 7 documents were complete. The 3-year overall survival rate of the RFA combined with TACE group was significantly better than that of the RFA group [odds ratio (OR) =1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42–2.74, Z=4.05, P<0.0001]. The 1-year and 3-year tumor recurrence-free survival rates in the RFA combined with TACE group were significantly better than those in the RFA group (OR =1.88, 95% CI: 1.28–2.76, Z=3.23, P=0.001; OR =2.11, 95% CI: 1.37–3.24, Z=3.38, P=0.0007). There was no significant difference in the complication rate of patients with primary liver cancer between the RFA combined with TACE group and the RFA group (OR =0.79, 95% CI: 0.45–1.39, Z=0.81, P=0.42).DiscussionMeta-analysis results confirmed that TACE combined with RFA was safe and effective in the treatment of primary liver cancer, and can improve the overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients with primary liver cancer.