Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures Research Articles

Feasibility and effectiveness of left bundle branch area pacing after TAVR: the single center experience

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe alternative to open-heart surgery in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk due to multiple comorbidities, advanced age, and severe left ventricle dysfunction. Due to anatomical considerations of the atrioventricular node, conduction abnormalities requiring the implantation of a pacemaker are common findings after TAVR. High-grade atrioventricular block and new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) are the most commonly reported conduction abnormalities after TAVR. Purpose The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility, success rates, and effectiveness of LBBAP in patients requiring pacing after TAVR. Methods A total of 302 patients underwent the TAVR procedure in our institution in the period from January 2022 to November 2023. In this cohort, 38 patients required ventricular pacing in the postoperative period. 16 patients who underwent permanent pacing using LBBAP were included in this observational study. Patients undergoing traditional right ventricular pacing biventricular pacing or leadless pacemaker implantation were excluded from the study. Results LBBAP was successfully performed in 16 patients (89%). 2 patients underwent conventional CRT implantation (1 cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker and 1 cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator) in order to severe calcification and presence of fibrotic tissue in the target area. The mean age was 60.5±2.74 years, and 10 patients (62.5%) were women. According to the patient’s medical history, 14 patients (84%) had hypertension; coronary artery disease – 2 (12.5%), 2 (12.5%) patients had atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, and 7 (43.5%) patients had diabetes mellitus. The mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 46.2±14.7%. Interventricular septal thickness 11.8 ± 1.9 mm. Type of conduction diseases: Infranodal AV block and LBBB were present in 9 (56.5%) patients. 5 (31,25%) patients had persistent complete AV block and 2 (12,25%) had Mobitz II AV block. In 2 patients we observed congestive heart failure combined with LBBB. Pre-TAVR QRS morphology was normal in 15 (93%), and RBBB morphology in 1 (7%). The mean QRS duration at baseline was 105±20 ms. Pre-implant QRS duration 135±52 ms. The single-chamber pacemaker was implanted in 1 patient, dual-chamber pacemaker - 13 patients, and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in 2 patients. Procedural duration and fluoroscopy times were 105. ± 31.9 min and 18 ± 11 min, respectively. Conclusion Complete AV block and new-onset LBBB after TAVR is still an important issue. LBBB correction using conduction system pacing technology is an effective strategy for this type of patient. LBBAP is one of the most exciting developments in pacing therapy over the last few years. Long-term clinical outcomes and safety of physiological pacing data are limited and require further investigations

Association of urgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with acute kidney injury 30-days post-TAVR: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Recent studies have proven that TAVR is a viable treatment option for symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), regardless of surgical risk, even though, there are certain significant hazards associated with it. Even with the improvements in technique and experience, peri- and post-procedural complications like acute kidney injury (AKI) continue to occur frequently and are recognized for their serious clinical implications in the setting of TAVR. The vast majority of TAVR procedures conducted across the US are elective procedures on patients who are hemodynamically stable. Nonetheless, published data, imply that urgent TAVR, despite higher mortality rates is a feasible option to treat decompensated severe aortic valve stenosis. Purpose The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess AKI in patients 30-days after an urgent TAVR and compare them with the elective TAVR population. Methods This meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive database search was conducted using three major databases (Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus) for studies comparing patients submitted to urgent versus elective TAVR. Primary endpoint of our systematic review and meta-analysis is the AKI 30-days after TAVR. Only studies provided data about our primary endpoint were considered in the analysis. Secondary endpoints included myocardial infarction (MI), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) and bleeding events during the first 30-days post-procedurally. Risk ratio (RR) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a random-effects model (Mantel-Haenzel) was used to estimate the pooled RR. Results A total of 16 studies with 101,568 patients were added in our analysis. Among them, 16,349 patients underwent an urgent TAVR, while the rest 85,219 had an elective procedure. Our analysis showed that patients submitted to urgent TAVR have 258% higher risk for AKI during the first 30-days post-procedurally (RR: 2.58, 95%CI: 1.98, 3.37) (Figure). Data about the 30-days MI, PPM and bleeding events were available for 9, 15 and 11 studies, respectively. The risk for MI appeared to be significantly higher in patients undergone urgent TAVR (RR: 5.49, 95% CI: 1.76, 17.05), while the risk for bleeding events was slightly higher in the same group (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.70). No significant differences were observed in PPM incidence (RR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.11) during 30-days follow-up. Conclusion In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients undergoing urgent TAVR procedures compared to elective procedures have increased risk for AKI during the first 30-days post-TAVR. Thus, when urgent TAVR is performed risk factors for AKI should be evaluated and proper renal protection measures, such as adequate hydration and minimal contrast agent administration, should be implemented. Further research in this area is warranted.

Urgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis is associated with increased 30-days mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction In patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a safe and effective therapeutic option; yet, 20% of these patients' hospitalizations are related to acute decompensation. The vast majority of TAVR procedures conducted across the US are elective procedures on patients who are hemodynamically stable. Despite that, according to recent research, urgent TAVR may be a feasible option for AS patients experiencing acutely decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock. Additionally, there is also a gap in the guidelines concerning the interventions in this acute setting, with only a brief recommendation for aortic balloon valvuloplasty as a bridge to TAVR or surgery in decompensated AS. Purpose The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess 30-days mortality post-TAVR in patients submitted to an urgent procedure and compare them with the elective TAVR population. Methods We systematically searched three major databases (Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus) for studies comparing patients submitted to urgent versus elective TAVR. Primary endpoint of our systematic review and meta-analysis is the 30-days mortality post-procedurally. Only studies provided data about our primary endpoint were considered in this analysis. Secondary endpoints comprised acute kidney injury (AKI), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) and stroke during the first 30-days post-TAVR. Risk ratio (RR) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a random-effects model (Mantel-Haenzel) was used to estimate the pooled RR. Results This systematic review acquired 497 results. After duplicates removal, we screened 454 reports and we read full-text articles of 35 studies. Fourteen studies were included in our analysis. A total of 43,051 patients undergoing TAVR were included in our analysis; 3,607 patients submitted to an urgent TAVR, while the rest 39,444 had an elective procedure. Our analysis showed that patients undergoing urgent TAVR have 244% higher risk for mortality during the first 30-days post-procedurally (RR: 2.44, 95%CI: 1.49, 3.99) (Figure). Data about AKI, PPM and stroke during the first 30-days post-TAVR were available for 10 studies. The risk for AKI appeared to be significantly higher in patients undergone urgent TAVR (RR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.60, 4.47). No significant differences were observed in stroke incidence (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.20) and PPM (RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.95, 1.22) during 30-days follow-up. Conclusion Compared to elective procedures, urgent TAVR seems to have increased 30-days mortality and AKI, and comparable PPM and stroke rates. These findings provide valuable insights offering potential updates to current guidelines in this field. Further studies on long-term outcomes and in a larger patient population are needed.

Prediction of hypoattenuating leaflet thickening in patients underwent transcatheter aortic valves replacement based on clinical factors and 4D-computed tomography morphological characteristics: A retrospective cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe rapid increase in the number of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures in China and worldwide has led to growing attention to hypoattenuating leaflet thickening (HALT) detected during follow-up by 4D-CT. It's reported that HALT may impact the durability of prosthetic valve. Early identification of these patients and timely deployment of anticoagulant therapy are therefore particularly important. MethodsWe retrospectively recruited 234 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR procedure in Fuwai Hospital. We collected clinical information and extracted morphological characteristics parameters of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) post TAVR procedure from 4D-CT. LASSO analysis was conducted to select important features. Three models were constructed, encapsulating clinical factors (Model 1), morphological characteristics parameters (Model 2), and all together (Model 3), to identify patients with HALT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were plotted to evaluate the discriminatory ability of models. A nomogram for HALT was developed and verified by bootstrap resampling. ResultsIn our study patients, Model 3 (AUC = 0.738) showed higher recognition effectiveness compared to Model 1 (AUC = 0.674, p = 0.032) and Model 2 (AUC = 0.675, p = 0.021). Internal bootstrap validation also showed that Model 3 had a statistical power similar to that of the initial stepwise model (AUC = 0.723 95%CI: 0.661–0.786). Overall, Model 3 was rated best for the identification of HALT in TAVR patients. ConclusionA comprehensive predictive model combining patient clinical factors with CT-based morphology parameters has superior efficacy in predicting the occurrence of HALT in TAVR patients.

Decreasing pacemaker implantation rates with Evolut supra-annular transcatheter aortic valves in a large real-world registry

BackgroundPermanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rates following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain a concern. We assessed the PPI rates over time in patients implanted with an Evolut supra-annular, self-expanding transcatheter valve from the US STS/ACC TVT Registry. MethodsPatients who underwent TAVR with an Evolut R, Evolut PRO or Evolut PRO+ valve between July 2018 (Q3) and June 2021 (Q2) were included. PPI rates were reported by calendar quarter. In-hospital PPI rates were reported as proportions and 30-day rates as Kaplan-Meier estimates. A Cox regression model was used to determine potential predictors of a new PPI within 30 days of the TAVR procedure. ResultsFrom July 2018 to June 2021, 54,014 TAVR procedures were performed using Evolut valves. Mean age was 79.3 ± 8.8 years and 49.2 % were male. The 30-day PPI rate was 16.6 % in 2018 (Q3) and 10.8 % in 2021 (Q2, 34.9 % decrease, p < 0.001 for trend across all quarters). The in-hospital PPI rate decreased by 40.1 %; from 14.7 % in 2018 (Q3) to 8.8 % in 2021 (Q2) (p < 0.001 for trend across all quarters). Significant predictors of a new PPI within 30 days included a baseline conduction defect, history of atrial fibrillation, home oxygen, and diabetes mellitus. ConclusionFrom 2018 to 2021, TAVR with an Evolut transcatheter heart valve in over 50,000 patients showed a significant decreasing trend in the rates of in-hospital and 30-day PPI, representing the lowest rate of PPI in any large real-world registry of Evolut. During the same evaluated period, high device success and shorter length of stay was also observed.

Comparison of the outcomes of concurrent versus staged TAVR combined with PCI in patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The optimal timing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains uncertain. This research aims to evaluate the results of patients diagnosed with severe aortic valve stenosis and coronary artery disease who undergo either simultaneous or staged PCI therapy during TAVR procedures. We retrieved all relevant studies from our self-constructed databases up to January 2, 2024, encompassing databases such as Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and PubMed. A total of nine studies were included, and the results showed that both surgical modalities had good safety profiles in the early and long-term stages. For early endpoint events, the risk of all-cause mortality and major bleeding within 30 years was similar in the staged TAVR + PCI and the contemporaneous TAVR + PCI (P > 0.05). Additionally, the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury and pacemaker implantation within 30 days or perioperatively is similar (P > 0.05). For long-term endpoint events, the risk of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke was similar in the two groups at ≥2 years (P > 0.05). In patients undergoing TAVR who required coronary revascularization, no significant differences were observed in the early and long-term outcomes between those receiving concurrent TAVR and PCI versus staged surgery.

Sarcopenia and aortic valve disease.

Valvular heart disease, including calcific or degenerative aortic stenosis (AS), is increasingly prevalent among the older adult population. Over the last few decades, treatment of severe AS has been revolutionised following the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Despite improvements in outcomes, older adults with competing comorbidities and geriatric syndromes have suboptimal quality of life outcomes, highlighting the cumulative vulnerability that persists despite valve replacement. Sarcopenia, characterised by loss of muscle strength, mass and function, affects 21%-70% of older adults with AS. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of short-term and long-term outcomes after TAVR and should be incorporated as a prognostic marker in preprocedural planning. Early diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia may reduce morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life following TAVR. The adverse effects of sarcopenia can be mitigated through resistance training and optimisation of nutritional status. This is most efficacious when administered before sarcopenia has progressed to advanced stages. Management should be individualised based on the patient's wishes/preferences, care goals and physical capability. Exercise during the preoperative waiting period may be safe and effective in most patients with severe AS. However, future studies are needed to establish the benefits of prehabilitation in improving quality of life outcomes after TAVR procedures.

Prognostic impact of insomnia in patients receiving trans-catheter aortic valve replacement

BackgroundThe presence of insomnia exhibits a profound association with diverse cardiovascular pathologies. However, its prognostic implications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis remain ambiguous. MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis at a prominent academic center from 2015 to 2022. The impact of insomnia, operationally defined as the prescription of soporific agents, on the two-year composite primary outcome comprising all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions was scrutinized. ResultsA cohort of 345 patients (median age 85 years, 99 males) was encompassed in the analysis. All subjects underwent successful TAVR and subsequent discharge. The presence of insomnia (N = 91) emerged as an independent predictor of the two-year composite endpoint, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.66 (95 % confidence interval 1.08–2.57, p = 0.022), significantly delineating the two-year cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint (40 % versus 30 %, p = 0.035). ConclusionApproximately one-fourth of TAVR candidates manifested symptoms of insomnia, a condition autonomously correlated with heightened mortality and morbidity following the TAVR procedure. The optimal strategy for addressing insomnia in TAVR candidates constitutes a paramount consideration for future interventions.

Extent of cardiac damage and hospitalization burden in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Cardiac damage has gained increasing attention as a valid prognostic marker of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, studies investigating the possible association between cardiac damage and hospitalization burden in TAVR patients are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline cardiac damage on the hospitalization burden before, during, and after TAVR in an all-comers population. All consecutive patients who underwent TAVR between 2016 and 2020 were included. Electronic medical records of all patients were examined to validate cardiovascular (CV) and heart failure (HF) related hospitalizations from 6 months before to 1 year after TAVR. Baseline cardiac damage was defined according to the staging classification by Généreux et al. RESULTS: Among 1397 TAVR patients, 94 (6.7%) had stage 0, 368 (26.4%) stage 1, 736 (52.7%) stage 2, 115 (8.2%) stage 3, and 84 (6.0%) stage 4 cardiac damage. Patients with more advanced cardiac damage at baseline had more HF hospitalizations within 6 months before TAVR (p < 0.01) and with a longer length of stay (LoS) (p < 0.01). Regarding the index TAVR admission, there was no difference in procedure time (p = 0.26) or LoS (p = 0.18) between groups. Still, TAVR patients with more advanced baseline cardiac damage had a higher risk of CV and HF rehospitalization after TAVR (p < 0.05). Baseline cardiac damage in patients undergoing TAVR has an impact on the pre- and post-procedural cardiovascular hospitalization burden. However, the cardiac damage status does not affect the TAVR procedure time or index TAVR admission length of stay.

Temporal trends in outcomes following inpatient transcatheter aortic valve replacement

IntroductionDespite the growing adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there remains a lack of clinical data evaluating procedural safety and discharge practices. AimsThis study aims to investigate if there have been improvements in postoperative clinical outcomes following TAVR. MethodsIn this large-scale, retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent TAVR as an inpatient were identified from 2016 to 2020 using the National Readmissions Database. The primary outcome was temporal trends in the rates of discharge to home. Secondary endpoints assessed annual discharge survival rates, 30-day readmissions, length of stay, and periprocedural cardiac arrest rates. ResultsOver the 5-year study period, a total of 31,621 inpatient TAVR procedures were identified. Of these, 79.2 % of patients were successfully discharged home with home disposition increasing year-over-year from 74.5 % in 2016 to 85.9 % in 2020 (Odds ratio: 2.01; 95 % CI 1.62–2.48, p < 0.001). The mean annual discharge survival rate was 97.7 % which did not change significantly over the 5-year study period (p = 0.551). From 2016 to 2020, 30-day readmissions decreased from 14.0 % to 10.3 %, respectively (p = 0.028). Perioperative cardiac arrest occurred in 1.8 % (n = 579) of cases with rates remaining unchanged during the study (p = 0.674). ConclusionMost TAVR patients are successfully discharged alive and home, with decreasing 30-day readmissions observed over recent years. This data suggests potential improvements in preoperative planning, procedural safety, and postoperative care. Despite perioperative cardiac arrest being associated with high mortality, it remains a relatively rare complication of TAVR.

Application of echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and correlation analysis of postprocedural complications.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is gradually becoming an alternative therapy for patients who cannot adapt to surgical treatment or have contraindications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of echocardiography in the evaluation of severe AR patients treated with TAVR and to analyze the correlations with postprocedural complications to improve the evaluation and screening of patients. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and echocardiographic data of 70 patients with severe AR. Periaortic valve structures were carefully measured by esophageal echocardiography (TEE) and compared with the multilayer slice computed tomography (MSCT) findings. Real-time three-dimensional esophageal echocardiography (RT-3D TEE) was monitored during the operation, and a 30-day postprocedural follow-up was performed. The relationship between postprocedural complications and patients' clinical data or periaortic valve structures was analyzed by multifactorial analysis to identify relevant predictors of complications. The TEE measurements of periaortic valve structures were in good agreement with the MSCT measurements. Among the patients who underwent successful operations, both left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) diameters were reduced, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was improved 30 days after TAVR compared with the preprocedural period (P<.05). Permanent pacemakers were implanted in 15 patients. The presence of preprocedural right bundle branch block (RBBB) (OR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.18-12.70; P=.01) was an independent factor for permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR. Echocardiography plays an extremely important role in TAVR procedures. The presence of preprocedural RBBB can be an independent predictor of postprocedural pacemaker implantation.

Validation Study of Two Artificial Intelligence–Based Preplanning Methods for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures

Validation Study of Two Artificial Intelligence–Based Preplanning Methods for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures

Optimizing Anesthetic Selection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Striking a Delicate Balance between Efficacy and Minimal Intervention.

Patients with severe calcific native aortic valve stenosis (AS) who require valve replacement have two options, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). TAVR was approved in late 2011 for extremely high-risk patients and was subsequently approved for high-risk (2012), intermediate-risk (2016), and low-risk (2019) patients. In 2019, TAVR procedures surpassed SAVR procedures for the first time in the United States. The approach to anesthesia for this procedure has also evolved. Initially, general anesthesia (GA) was preferred, but currently, conscious sedation (CS) is favored. This review aims to clarify the indications and contraindications for both approaches, as well as the advantages of one approach over the other. Recent studies show that conscious sedation has better outcomes in terms of all-cause mortality, procedure complications such as stroke, myocardial infarction, infection requiring antibiotics, acute kidney injury, and the need for inotropes or vasopressors.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical or Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Valves: A Comprehensive Review.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has proven to be a safe, effective, and less invasive approach to aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. In patients who underwent prior aortic valve replacement, transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic valve dysfunction may occur as a result of structural deterioration or nonstructural causes such as prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and paravalvular regurgitation. Valve-in-Valve (ViV) TAVR is a procedure that is being increasingly utilized for the replacement of failed transcatheter or surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves. Data regarding long-term outcomes are limited due to the recency of the procedure's approval, but available data regarding the short- and long-term outcomes of ViV TAVR are promising. Studies have shown a reduction in perioperative and 30-day mortality with ViV TAVR procedures compared to redo surgical repair of failed bioprosthetic aortic valves, but 1-year and 5-year mortality rates are more controversial and lack sufficient data. Despite the reduction in 30-day mortality, PPM and rates of coronary obstruction are higher in ViV TAVR as compared to both redo surgical valve repair and native TAVR procedures. New transcatheter heart valve designs and new procedural techniques have been developed to reduce the risk of PPM and coronary obstruction. Newer generation valves, new procedural techniques, and increased operator experience with ViV TAVR may improve patient outcomes; however, further studies are needed to better understand the safety, efficacy, and durability of ViV TAVR.

Carbon Footprint of Total Intravenous and Inhalation Anesthesia in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedure

ObjectiveWe aimed to quantify and compare the emissions for deep sedation with TIVA and general anesthesia with inhaled agents during the transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure. Designa retrospective study. Settingat a tertiary hospital in Boston. ParticipantsThe anesthesia records of 604 consecutive patients who underwent the TAVR procedure between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022 were reviewed and analyzed. InterventionsData were examined and compared in the following two groups: general anesthesia with inhaled agents and deep sedation with TIVA. Measurements & Main ResultsThe gases, drugs, airway management devices, and anesthesia machine electricity were collected and converted into CO2e. The carbon emissions of intravenous medications were converted with the CO2e data for anesthetic pharmaceuticals from Parvatker et al. study. For inhaled agents, inhaled anesthetics and oxygen/air flow rate were collected at 15-minute intervals and calculated using the anesthetic gases calculator provided by the Association of Anesthetists. The airway management devices were converted based on life-cycle assessments. The electricity consumed by the anesthesia machine during general anesthesia was estimated from the manufacturer's data (Drager, GE, USA) and local Energy Information Administration data. The data were analyzed in the Chi-squared test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. There were no significant differences in the patient's demographic characteristics, such as age, gender, weight, height, and BMI. The patients who received general anesthesia with inhaled agents had statistically higher total CO2e per case than deep sedation with TIVA (16.188 vs. 1.518 kg CO2e, P < 0.001), primarily due to the inhaled agents and secondarily to airway management devices. For deep sedation with TIVA, the major contributors were intravenous medications (71.02%) and airway management devices (16.58%). A subgroup study of patients who received sevoflurane only showed the same trend with less variation. ConclusionsWe found that the patients who received volatile anesthesia had a higher CO2e per case. This difference remained after a subgroup analysis evaluating those patients only receiving sevoflurane and after accounting for the differences in the duration of anesthesia. Data from this study and others should be collectively considered as a health care profession aims to provide the best care possible for our patients while limiting the harm we cause to the environment.

Effect of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Post-TAVR Mortality and Periprocedural Pulmonary Hypertension.

To evaluate the impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on periprocedural pulmonary hypertension (PH) and 3-month all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to develop a nomogram for predicting the mortality for these patients. 124 patients undergoing TAVR were categorized into three groups according to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP): Group I (no PH, n = 61) consisted of patients with no pre- and post-TAVR PH; Group II (improved PH, n = 35) consisted of patients with post-TAVR systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) decreased by more than 10 mmHg compared to pre-TAVR levels; and Group III (persistent PH, n = 28) consisted of patients with post-TAVR sPAP no decrease or less than 10 mmHg, or new-onset PH after the TAVR procedure. The risk of all-cause mortality within 3 months tended to be higher in Group II (11.4%) and Group III (14.3%) compared to Group I (3.3%) (P=0.057). The multinomial logistic regression analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between NLR and both improved PH (OR: 1.182, 95% CI: 1.036-1.350, P=0.013) and persistent PH (OR: 1.181, 95% CI: 1.032-1.352, P=0.016). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant association between higher NLR and increased 3-month all-cause mortality (16.1% vs. 3.1% in lower NLR group, P=0.021). The multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that NLR was an independent predictor for all-cause mortality within 3 months, even after adjusting for clinical confounders. A nomogram incorporating five factors (BNP, heart rate, serum total bilirubin, NLR, and comorbidity with coronary heart disease) was developed. ROC analysis was performed to discriminate the ability of the nomogram, and the AUC was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.850-1.000, P < 0.001). Patients with higher baseline NLR were found to be at an increased risk of periprocedural PH and all-cause mortality within 3 months after TAVR.

Factors Influencing Implantation Depth During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Optimised implantation depth (OID) is crucial to obtain the best haemodynamic and clinical outcome during transcatheter heart valve (THV) deployment. OID ensures a better haemodynamic profile and is associated with a potential reduction in permanent pacemaker implantations, both of which are important during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Apart from patient-related anatomic conditions, many factors, such as THV and wire selection, as well as implantation strategies, can be controlled by the operator and facilitate the implantation process. However, there are only limited data dealing with predictors for OID. Therefore, the aim of this review was to outline factors and tools that might influence the final implantation depth during TAVR procedures, potentially influencing the outcome.

Female showed favorable left ventricle hypertrophy regression during post-TAVR follow-up.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established procedure using a catheter-introduced valve prosthesis for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). This retrospective study investigated sex-related differences in pre- and post-TAVR clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and analyzed data of the first 100 cases at Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (KMUH) between December 2013 and December 2021. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, mortality rates, and echocardiographic parameters were analyzed and compared between sexes. Among the 100 patients, male (46%) and female (54%) were of similar age (mean age, male 86.0 years vs. female 84.5 years) and of the same severity of AS (mean pressure gradient, male 47.5 mmHg vs. female 45.7 mmHg) at the time receiving the TAVR procedure. Women had smaller aortic valve areas calculated by continuity equation (0.8 ± 0.3 cm2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2, p < 0.001). In addition, women had better left ventricle ejection fraction (59.6 ± 14.0% vs. men 54.7 ± 17.2%, p < 0.01). In the post-TAVR follow-up, regression of left ventricle mass and dimension was better in women than in men. None of the patient died within 30 days after the procedure, and women tended to have a more favorable survival than men (2-year mortality and overall mortality rate in 8.3 year, women 9.1% and 22.2% vs. men 22.2% and 34.8%; p = 0.6385 and 0.1277, respectively). In conclusion, the sex-based difference in post-TAVR regression of LV remodeling suggests a need for sex-based evaluation for patients with severe AS and their post TAVR follow-up.

National Variability in Pacemaker Implantation Rate Following TAVR: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry

BackgroundAlthough permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a common complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), hospital variation and change in PPM implantation rates are ill defined. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine hospital-level variation and temporal trends in the rate of PPM implantation following TAVR. MethodsUsing the American College of Cardiology/Society of Thoracic Surgeons TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry, temporal changes in variation of in-hospital and 30-day PPM implantation were determined among 184,452 TAVR procedures across 653 sites performed from 2016 to 2020. The variation in PPM implantation adjusted for valve type by annualized TAVR volume was determined, and characteristics of sites below, within, and above the 95% boundary were identified. A series of stepwise multivariable hierarchical models were then fit, and the median OR was used to measure variation in pacemaker rates among sites. ResultsFrom 2016 to 2020, the overall rate of PPM implantation was 11.3%, with wide variation across sites (range: 0%-36.4%); rates trended lower over time. Adjusted for annualized volume, there were 34 sites with PPM implantation rates above the 95th percentile CI and 28 with rates below, with wide variation among the remaining sites. After adjusting for patient-level covariates, there was variation among sites in the probability of PPM implantation (median OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.35-1.43, P < 0.001); although some of the variation was explained by the addition of valve type, residual variation in PPM implantation rates persisted in additional models incorporating site-level covariates (annualized volume, region, teaching status, hospital beds, etc). ConclusionsAlthough PPM implantation rates have decreased over time, substantial site-level variation remains even after accounting for observed patient characteristics and site-level factors. As there are numerous outlier sites both above and below the 95% confidence limit, dissemination of best practices from high-performing sites to low-performing sites and guideline-based education may be important quality improvement initiatives to reduce rates of this common complication.

Midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with active cancer

ObjectivesThe clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant active cancer remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes...