Transabdominal Preperitoneal Group Research Articles

Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: Retrospective study, our experience

Abstract: Surgical correction of inguinal hernias is the most commonly used surgical procedure in the world. Currently only three surgical techniques have been validated, that is the Shouldice technique, the Lichtenstein technique, and laparoscopic techniques such as transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty and totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP).The aim of the study: The aim of this study is to show the results in terms of postoperative recovery, complications, length of hospitalization after inguinal hernia surgery in patients who underwent the Lichtenstein and the laparoscopic (TAPP) methods.Material and methods: This is a monocentric, retrospective cohort study, conducted in the period from 2019 to 2023. The research period covered 70 patients who underwent surgery at the Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery with Glandular Surgery, of the University Clinical Center, Sarajevo. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: 20 patients who underwent the TAPP method and Group 2: 50 patients who underwent the Lichtenstein method. All patients underwent surgery performed by two doctors.Results: One woman (1.4%) and 69 men (98.6%) participated in the research. Of the total number, 50 patients (72.5%) were treated with the Lichtenstein technique, and 19 (27.5%) were treated with the TAPP technique (p=0.539). The statistical results did not show a significant difference in the average age between patients who underwent the Lichtenstein and the TAPP technique (T=0.759; p=0.450).Discussion: There was no significant difference in relation to age and type of surgery (T=0.759; p=0.450). There was no statistical difference in the choice of surgical approach in relation to the laterality of the hernia (P<0.001), nor any statistically significant difference between the TAPP and Lichtenstein surgical procedures in relation to BMI T=0.613; p=0.542. Our analyses showed that patients treated with the TAPP technique had a statisticallysignificantly higher probability of shorter postoperative hospitalization compared to those treated with the Lichtenstein technique (B=0.245; p=0.019). Two patients in the study had complications within 30 days (Clavien-Dindo Grade I and Grade IIIB).Conclusion: Using an individual approach for each patient, surgical treatment of hernia using laparoscopic TAPP can be the first choice in patients without comorbidities, without previous pelvic surgery, bilaterality or recurrence of previous surgery (anterior approach). Patients treated with the laparoscopic technique (TAPP) have a shorter hospitalization time, which ultimately affects the economic aspect.

Management of groin hernias in emergency setting: differences in indications and outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach. A single-center retrospective experience

PurposeThe use of minimally invasive groin hernia repair techniques in an emergency setting is still debated and its widespread is limited.The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique in the treatment of inguinal and femoral hernias in emergency setting based on our experience, comparing indications and outcomes with the open technique.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed including all patients with incarcerated and/or strangulated groin hernia who underwent emergency surgery from November 2019 to September 2022.Perioperative variables and short- and long-term outcomes were examined.Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test for nominal variables and Student’s t test for continuous ones. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSixty-six patients were included: 29 patients were treated with TAPP technique (Tapp group) and 37 with open technique plus diagnostic laparoscopy (Open group). Patients in the TAPP group were younger, had less severe clinical scenarios, and had a trend for lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, whereas ASA score and BMI were similar. The small bowel was more frequently herniated in the open group.Bilateral hernia repair was performed in 20.69% of patients in the Tapp group versus 0% in the Open group (p = 0.004). Bowel resection was more frequent in the open group (48.65% vs 0% of the Tapp group, p < 0.001) length of surgery was comparable in the two groups. In the Tapp group, the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter (2.59 ± 2.28 days vs. 9.08 ± 14.48 days; p = 0.023).Postoperative complications, according to Clavien-Dindo, were more severe in Open group where there were two deaths. There were no differences in the number of readmission and re-operations at 30 days and in the recurrence rate.ConclusionsEmergency repair of inguinal and femoral hernias using TAPP is a valuable option, safe and feasible in selected patients. In this series, indications for TAPP were reserved to younger patients with less comorbidities and less severe clinical scenario. Future randomized studies are needed to compare TAPP with open emergency hernia surgery in all settings. Potential advantages of TAPP are the reduction of postoperative complications, earlier recovery, and the possibility of bilateral treatment.

Comparison of Perioperative Complication Rates of Total Extraperitoneal and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repairs in Primary Inguinal Hernia.

Hernia may be defined as a protrusion of viscus through layers anatomically designed to contain that viscus. Most abdominal hernias occur at well-described sites of potential weakness. Repair of inguinal hernia is one of the most common operations in general surgery. Objectives: To compare the perioperative complication rates of total extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs of primary inguinal hernias. It is a randomised comparative study, conducted at the department of general surgery. A total of 50 patients were included and divided into two groups with 25 in each. Group A represents the laparoscopic TEP repair and group B represents the laparoscopic TAPP repair. Patients above 18 years with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were included. Patients having complicated inguinal hernia and history of previous abdominal surgery were excluded. We observed that hernia occurrence is more common in the 31-50 years of age group and right-sided hernia is more common. Scrotal oedema and conversion to open surgery chances are similar in both TEP and TAPP groups. The duration of surgery in TEP is significantly higher as compared to TAPP. Patients who underwent TEP experienced less pain as compared to TAPP as per visual analogue scale. Postoperative hospital stay and time taken to resume the routine activity were significantly less in case of TEP. TEP is preferred over TAPP for laparoscopic hernia repair because it preserves the peritoneal integrity and has lesser postoperative pain. The early recovery and return to the routine work were seen with the patient treated with the TEP and also showed better visual analogue score than the TAPP repair group.

Bilateral inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) vs. laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP)

BackgroundThe guidelines recommend laparoscopic repair for bilateral inguinal hernia. However, few studies compare the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques in bilateral inguinal hernias. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of TEP and TAPP in bilateral inguinal hernia.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients operated on for bilateral inguinal hernia by TEP and TAPP repair from 2016 to 2020. Intraoperative complications, operative time, acute postoperative pain, hospital stay, postoperative complications, chronic inguinal pain, and recurrence were compared.ResultsA total of 155 patients were included in the study. TEP was performed in 71 patients (46%) and TAPP in 84 patients (54%). The mean operative time was longer in the TAPP group than in the TEP group (107 min vs. 82 min, p < 0.001). The conversion rate to open surgery was higher in the TEP group than in the TAPP group (8.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.008). The mean hospital stay was longer in the TAPP group than in the TEP group (p < 0.001). We did not observe significant differences in the proportion of postoperative complications (p = 0.672), postoperative pain at 24 h (p = 0.851), chronic groin pain (p = 0.593), and recurrence (p = 0.471). We did not observe an association between the choice of surgical technique (TEP vs. TAPP) with conversion rate, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, chronic inguinal pain, or hernia recurrence when performing a multivariable analysis adjusted for the male sex, age, BMI, ASA, recurrent hernia repair, surgeon, and hernia size > 3cm.ConclusionsBilateral inguinal hernia repair by TEP and TAP presented similar outcomes in our study.

A Prospective Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal Hernial Repair.

Introduction Inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem throughout the world. Currently, the management options available are open mesh hernioplasty and laparoscopic mesh repair. Laparoscopic mesh repair can be performed by either transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. Many studies comparing the two procedures have been unable to establish the superiority of one procedure over the other and have yielded conflicting results. Thus, we performed this study to compare TAPP and TEP. Aim The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomesand safety of laparoscopic TEP and laparoscopic TAPP for inguinal hernia repair. Materials and methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of surgical procedures. The first group of patients underwent laparoscopic TAPP mesh repair, and the second group of patients underwent laparoscopic TEP mesh repair. Their intraoperative and postoperative findings were noted. Patients were followed up at regular intervals for up to six months. Results The mean age and mean weight distribution between the two groups were not significant. The duration of surgeryneeded (in minutes) for TAPP was found to be significantly less compared to TEP. In the TEP group, conversion to open occurred for three subjects (6.7%) while there was no conversion in the TAPP group. Postoperative pain at 24 hrs was found to be higher in TAPP subjects compared to that in TEP subjects, but the difference was statistically insignificant. Tolerance to a liquid diet started few hours after surgery was found to be the same in both groups. Association of the duration of hospital stays with the type of surgery was not significant. Six subjects (13.2%) showed hematoma in the TEP group while five subjects (11%) in the TAPP group showed hematoma after one week of surgery. Eight subjects (17.6%) showed seroma in the TEP group while three subjects (15.4%) in the TAPP group showed seroma after one week of surgery. Two subjects (4.4%) showed superficial wound infection in both the TEP group and TAPP group after one week of surgery. Four subjects each (8.9%) showed scrotal edema in the TEP group as well as the TAPP group after one week of surgery. No subject showed port site hernia withoutclosureofthesheathat one-week, one-month,and six-monthfollow-upvisits. Two subjects (4.4%) each showed groin pain in the TEP group as well as the TAPP group after one week of surgery. There were no instances of bowel obstruction or mesh infection. Conclusion TEP is a more skill-demanding procedure as compared to TAPP and thus takes more time to perform. However, it is superior on account of not breaching the peritoneum. TAPP is favorable for larger hernias. The choice of procedure should be individualized according to the patient's characteristics and surgeon's preference.

Comparison of Extended Total Extraperitoneal (E-TEP) Repair and Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia Repair.

To find the superiority of extended total extraperitoneal (E-TEP) repair and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair in inguinal hernia repair. A total of 30 patients with a unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia (IH), and recurrent IH, following open repair were studied. Out of 30 patients, laparoscopic TAPP or E-TEP mesh repair was performed in an equal number of inguinal hernia patients. The patient's demographic parameters, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were compared. In the E-TEP group, 33.33% of patients had left inguinal hernia (LIH), 60% of patients were diagnosed with right inguinal hernia (RIH) and 6.67% of patients had right inguinal and right direct hernia (RDH). In the TAPP group, 33.33% of patients had LIHand 53.33% of patients were suffering from RIH. Moreover, 6.67% of patients were diagnosed with a left inguinal direct hernia, and a similar proportion of patients had a right inguinal direct hernia.The mean duration of surgery was found to be significantly higher in the TAPP group(P<0.0000). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.07±0.59and 2.80±1.32 days in E-TEP and TAPP groups, respectively (P=0.044). In the present study, E-TEP mesh repair is a superior technique in the management of inguinal hernia as compared with TAPP repair.

Pain and quality of life after laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair

Introduction Surgical repair of inguinal hernias is one of the most frequently performed operations. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and Total extraperitoneal (TEP) methods are the two commonly employed laparoscopic methods for herniorrhaphy. Objective To evaluate the pain and quality of life (QoL) following laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery utilizing the TAPP and TEP methods. Patients and methods One hundred individuals with unilateral inguinal hernias who had received a clinical diagnosis participated in this prospective trial. The research population was randomly split into two groups by computer-generated software: group A, which consisted of 50 inguinal hernia patients who experienced laparoscopic TAPP surgery, and group B, which consisted of 50 inguinal hernia patients who were treated with laparoscopic TEP surgery. Results After one week and one month postoperatively, the TAPP group had a higher median pain VAS score than the TEP group, which was significant statistically (p values 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). The two groups’ VAS scores did not differ significantly after three- and six-months follow-up. In terms of preoperative and six-month postoperative QoL related domains, the TAPP versus TEP patients showed insignificant difference. Cases involving TAPP and TEP showed an increase of statistical significance in QoL domains from preoperative to six months following surgery. Conclusion According to our investigation, TEP is superior to TAPP. When performed by skilled hands, it appears to be the best method for repairing inguinal hernias.

Lichtenstein versus TIPP versus TAPP versus TEP for primary inguinal hernia, a matched propensity score study on the French Club Hernie Registry.

Groin hernia repair is one of the most frequent operation performed worldwide. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is the most common and challenging complication after surgical repair with subsequent high socio-economic impact. The aim of this study was to compare the one-year CPIP rates between Lichtenstein, trans-inguinal pre-peritoneal (TIPP), trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair techniques on the French Hernia Registry. Between 2011 and 2021, 15,161 primary groin hernia repairs with 1-year follow-up were available on the register. Using propensity score (PS) matching, matched pairs were formed. Each group was compared in pairs independently; Lichtenstein versus TIPP, TEP and TAPP, TIPP versus TEP and TAPP and finally TEP versus TAPP. After PS matching analysis, Lichtenstein group showed disadvantage over TIPP, TAPP and TEP groups with significantly more CPIP at one year (15.2% vs 9.6%, p < 0.0001; 15.9% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.0001 and 16.1% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.002, respectively). The 1-year CPIP rates were similar comparing TIPP versus TAPP and TEP groups (9.3% vs 10.5%, p = 0.19 and 9.8% vs 11.8%, p = 0.05, respectively). There was significantly less CPIP rate after TAPP versus TEP repair (1.00% vs 11.9%, p = 0.02). This register-based study confirms the higher CPIP risk after Lichtenstein repair compared to the pre-peritoneal repair techniques. TIPP leads to comparable CPIP rates than TAPP and TEP repairs.

Comparison of open preperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair for primary unilateral femoral hernia: a retrospective cohort study of 132 case.

Femoral hernia (FH) is traditionally treated by open surgery (OS). Laparoscopic treatment has also shown good results in treating FH. However, there have been few comparative studies of these two techniques. Therefore, our aim was to compare the outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgical FH treatment. Adult patients with primary unilateral FH undergoing OS or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair at our hospital from January 2013 to June 2018 were included in this study. Patients with history of abdominal surgery, contraindications to general anesthesia and those not wishing to receive general anesthesia received OS. Demographics, operation details and complications were compared retrospectively between the two groups. A total of 132 patients were recruited to the study, 62 and 70 of whom underwent OS and TAPP, respectively. Compared to OS group, the TAPP group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 2.0days, respectively, P < 0.05) and a lower postoperative pain score (3.0 vs. 1.0, P < 0.05), and took less time to return to normal activities (13.0 vs. 6.0days, respectively, P < 0.05). The overall complication rates were equivalent between the groups (10 vs. 9.7%, OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.329-3.270). Both laparoscopic and open surgery appear to be safe and effective in a cohort of patients with femoral hernia and laparoscopic surgery might offer some advantages in reducing length of hospital stay, lower postoperative pain score and quicker return to activities.

Quality of life of patients after inguinal hernia repair

Introduction. Endoscopic procedures for inguinal hernia repair have become widespread. There are many methods of such treatment: transinguinal preperitoneal mesh-plasty (TIPP), TAPP, TEP, MINI (combination of TEP and TAPP). However, the most common among them are TAPP and TEP. Despite the fact that these procedures are now common in many hospitals, the choice of tactics and repair procedures for different types of inguinal hernias is still uncertain. First, it concerns the quality of life of patients.&#x0D; Aim. The aim of this study was to compare TAPP, TEP and Lichtenstein based on quality of life analysis using the EuraHS-QoL scale.&#x0D; Materials and methods. We performed surgical treatment of inguinal hernia in 211 patients. Lichtenstein's procedure was performed in 65 patients (Lichtenstein group), transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair in 81 patients (TAPP group) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair in 65 patients (TEP group). We assessed quality of life using a special scale for hernias (EuraHS-QoL). The missing values were treated according to the instructions of the validation study.&#x0D; Results and discussion. As we expected, inguinal hernia repair improved EuraHS-QoL scores in all groups. In the Lichtenstein group, the total mean decreased from 51.2 to 11.8 (4.3 times) (r=-0.13), in the TAPP group – from 51.1 to 9.9 (5.2 times), in the TEP group – from 51.2 to 12.6 (4.1 times). Cosmetic discomfort was highest at the follow-up visit in patients in the Lichtenstein group (4.2). In the TAPP group, this indicator was probably (p&lt;0.05) the smallest (3.0). Low-traumatic methods of operations in modern surgery are priorities today. The Lichtenstein procedure, despite its simplicity, is a traumatic operation compared to TAPP and TEP.&#x0D; Conclusions. Different options for inguinal hernia repair, which are based on the tension-free principle of inguinal canal correction, can be useful. However, when we analyzed the quality of life according to the EuraHS-QoL scale, we decided that transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair is the most optimal in terms of various indicators.

Pain After Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) or Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) Technique for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IntroductionLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is the most commonly performed surgery in many hospitals. This study aimed to compare the outcome of the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques in unilateral, uncomplicated inguinal Hernia.Material and methodsThis prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in North India from November 2018 to March 2020. Sixty-eight male patients of unilateral, uncomplicated inguinal hernia were enrolled for laparoscopic hernia repair. The first group of 34 patients underwent TAPP repair and the second group of 34 patients underwent TEP repair under general anesthesia (GA). Both groups were compared for intraoperative or postoperative complications, analgesic requirements, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, resumption of routine activity, and patient satisfaction scores. Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test were used for nominal data and the median or interquartile range was used for ordinal data.ResultsThe mean operative time for TAPP was more than that for the TEP group (101 vs 76, p<0.001). The TAPP group exhibited significantly less postoperative pain at six hours, 24 hours and seven days than TEP (p<0.001) and an insignificant difference at three months of the follow-up period (p=0.188). Additional analgesics requirement was less in the TAPP group, although the difference was not significant (p=0.099). Seroma formation was found in four patients (11.8%) in the TEP group and two patients (5.9%) in the TAPP group (p= 0.672). Length of postoperative hospital stay (p=0.907), resumption of routine activity (p=0.732), and patient satisfaction scores (p=0.492) during follow-up were similar in both groups and were also insignificant.ConclusionThe TAPP technique is slightly better than TEP for inguinal hernia in terms of lesser postoperative pain with similar chances of complications and other outcomes.

Totally extraperitoneal versus transabdominal preperitoneal approach: A comparative study between the two laparoscopic procedures

Background: Groin hernia surgery is one of the most common procedures performed by surgeons worldwide. With the advent of minimal access surgery, the procedure for repair is now done either by transabdominal preperitoneal approach Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. The advantage of one procedure over the other is still controversial.Objectives: This prospective study was conducted to find out the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of TEP and TAPP for inguinal hernia repair in terms of operative time, intraoperative complications, conversion to open, visual analog scale (VAS) score, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and recurrence of hernia and chronic pain.Materials and Methods: A total of 88 patients of inguinal hernia enrolled prospectively between November 2017 and November 2019 and patients aged 18 years and above admitted in Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital were included in this study. Forty-four patients were included in TEP group, while 44 patients were allocated to TAPP group.Results: The statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and unpaired t-test, respectively. The mean operative time in TEP was 91.14 ± 11.14 min and in TAPP repair was 103.16 ± 6.79 min, which was found to be significantly significant. The mean pain score on VAS score on postoperative day 1 was 5.70 ± 0.95 in laparoscopic TEP group and 5.86 ± 0.97 in laparoscopic TAPP group. The mean pain score on VAS score on postoperative day 2 was 3 ± 1.27 in laparoscopic TEP group and 2.95 ± 1.29 in laparoscopic TAPP group. Similarly, the mean pain score on VAS scale on postoperative day 7 was 0.863 ± 1.26 in laparoscopic TEP group and 0.659 ± 1.21 in laparoscopic TAPP group. No significant difference was observed in VAS between TEP and TAPP groups during follow-up. Both TEP and TAPP mesh techniques were comparable in terms of the intraoperative complications and postoperative complications (seroma [during hospital stay, after 1 week of discharge, after 1 month of follow-up]; hematoma [during hospital stay, after 1 week of discharge]; wound infection) and in conversion to open and length of hospital stay. The difference in mean cost of surgery was found to be statistically significant.Conclusion: Although the mean operative time and cost of surgery were significantly more in TAPP than in TEP group, no significant difference could be found between the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, conversion to open, and length of hospital stay. Recurrence was observed in one case of TEP groups during follow-up. Our study supports the view that both laparoscopic TEP and TAPP mesh repairs of inguinal hernia are safe and efficacious.

LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: THE LONG-TERM ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN AND QUALITY OF LIFE.

Laparoscopic approaches to inguinal hernia repair include transabdominal extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal, both of which are widely performed and employ mesh. Indicators of success for these surgical procedures include incidence of complications, time to return to daily activities, incidence of postoperative chronic pain, and the long-term postoperative patient satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate and compare long-term postoperative incidence of chronic pain and overall quality of life among patients undergoing transabdominal extraperitoneal or transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Medical records were analyzed, and the SF-36 questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale were applied to assess quality of life and chronic pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair between January 2017 and February 2021. A total of 167 patients status post laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, who were 3 months postoperatively or longer, were included in the study. Among the early complications seen, seroma was most common in the transabdominal preperitoneal group (p=0.04). Subsequently, 40 of the initial 167 patients answered to the survey instrument (SF-36 and Visual Analog Scale). Mean patient-reported pain (Visual Analog Scale score) was statistically similar between groups, with 1.29 for transabdominal preperitoneal and 1.68 for transabdominal extraperitoneal (p=0.92). In the domains evaluated by the SF-36, there was no significant difference between the samples. Both transabdominal extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal techniques for hernia repair have similar results in the late postoperative period regarding quality of life and prevalence of chronic pain. They are also comparable in terms of major early postoperative complications, except for seroma, with a higher incidence in patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal.

Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty and laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair for Nyhus type II hernia in women.

Indirect inguinal hernia with a dilated internal ring but an intact posterior inguinal wall is classified as Nyhus type II. Females have a higher incidence of indirect hernia than direct hernia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) compared with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty in treating women with Nyhus type II hernia. This retrospective study included 318 women aged ≥ 20years who were treated for Nyhus type II hernia from January 2013 to December 2018. The patients were categorized into two groups in accordance with the operative technique: the TAPP group (33 patients) and the IPTR group (285 patients). In the IPTR group, intraabdominal suturing of the iliopubic tract and transversalis fascia arch was performed without mesh implantation. The mean operation time was shorter in the IPTR group (17.2 ± 3.9min) than the TAPP group (20.5 ± 8.1min, p = 0.028). The postoperative complication rate was higher in the TAPP group than the IPTR group [6.1% (2/33) vs. 0.4% (1/285), respectively; p = 0.001]. Inguinodynia occurred in one patient in the TAPP group and no patients in the IPTR group. The hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups. The numeral rating scale pain scores at 1day and 1week postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two groups. There was no recurrence in either group. Laparoscopic IPTR was safe and feasible for treating Nyhus type II hernia in women.

Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair—TAPP versus TEP: Results of 301 Consecutive Patients

Introduction: Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair are the two most commonly used techniques in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, and the results of comparative studies are conflicting. The objective of this study is to compare the two methods in unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Materials and Methods: The data of consecutive patients who underwent TEP and TAPP due to unilateral inguinal hernia between December 7, 2017, and March 15, 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was to compare the clinical outcomes of the two techniques in terms of complications, conversion, pain, and operative time. The secondary outcome was recurrence rates. Results: A total of 301 (TEP n=234, TAPP n=67) patients were included in the study. The mean age was 43 years, and the follow-up period was two years. The groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and hernia type. The mean operative time was longer in the TAPP group than in the TEP group (67 min and 58 min, p=0.007). The recurrence rate was 4.3% in the TEP group and 5.9% in the TAPP group (p&gt;0.05). The conversion rate was 6% in both groups. In total, 19 (6.3%) patients had intraoperative complications (TEP n=16, TAPP n=3), and 23 (7.6%) patients had postoperative complications (TEP n=16, TAPP n=7). Both intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar between the groups (p=0.31 and p=0.051, respectively). The early postoperative pain was less in the TEP group (p=0.004). Conclusion: Less early postoperative pain and shorter operative time were detected in patients who underwent TEP.

Comparison of intraocular pressure during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair are standard laparoscopic procedures for inguinal hernia repair. Some evidence has shown that pneumoperitoneum can cause an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) during surgery. This study aimed to compare intraoperative IOP following extraperitoneal CO2 insufflation with the TEP approach and intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation with the TAPP approach. This study is a prospective cohort study. Patients who had inguinal hernias suitable for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were assigned to undergo the TEP or TAPP approach. We measured preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IOP. The IOP of the TEP and TAPP groups was evaluated using a t test. The relations between peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) were estimated using ANOVA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with IOP. There were 50 patients in this study (TEP group n = 25, TAPP group n = 25). The change in intraoperative IOP from the preoperative measurement to the measurement after CO2 insufflation was not statistically significant in either the TEP or TAPP group (p value = 0.357). There was no significant difference in intraoperative IOP change between the TEP and TAPP groups. Intraoperative MAP and PIP were related to IOP, but intraoperative EtCO2 was not. There was no significant intraoperative IOP change during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Both the TEP and TAPP techniques can be performed safely without increasing intraoperative IOP.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: cost-effectiveness analysis of trend modifications of the technique.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different modifications of the trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair of groin hernia. Data were collected prospectively for all consecutive patients who underwent TAPP unilateral inguinal hernia repair between November 2017 and March 2019, and who completed a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Costs and quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained were collected. Three TAPP variations were assessed: mesh fixation and peritoneal closure with staples (group 1); mesh fixation with fibrin glue and peritoneal closure with sutures (group 2); and mesh fixation and peritoneal closure with fibrin glue (group 3). A matched group of open repairs was established. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and main intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Overall 120 patients were included (group 1 n = 31; group 2 n = 27; group 3 n = 33; open group: 29). Operative time was shorter for groups 2 and 3, and the main post-operative outcomes were similar. The overall mean total cost of the open group (1185.95€) was lower compared with the laparoscopic group (group 1: 1682.39; group 2: 1538.54€; group 3: 1510.1€) (p = 0.026). However, the mean ICERs of groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher compared with group 1 (p = 0.021) and the open group (p = 0.032). At simulations analysis, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 33.32%, 36.26%, and 36.7% in TAPP groups 1, 2, and 3. In the long term, laparoscopic repair of groin hernia is cost-effective compared with open surgery. The use of fibrin glue for mesh fixation and/or for closing the peritoneum is the most cost-effective option and shortens operative times.

Comparison of Totally Extraperitoneal versus Transabdominal Preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias

Introduction: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a tension-free mesh repair that is based on pre-peritoneal approach of repair. It provides mechanical advantage to the surgeon, by being able to place a large piece of mesh and by using the natural force of the abdominal wall to disperse the intra-abdominal pressure over a large area to support the mesh. This retrospective study is aimed to study the demography of inguinal hernia and to compare operating time, complications and postoperative pain between patients undergoing Total Extrapritoneal (TEP) or Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair.Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted in patients with inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic repair by either TEP or TAPP, between April 2019 to July 2020 at Nobel Medical Collage Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Morang. Age, sex, type of hernia, duration of operation, post-operative complications, severity of pain and duration hospital stay were analyzed between two groups of patients undergoingsurgery by either TEP or TAPP.Results: One hundred and five patients underwent either TEP or TAPP during study period. There were 96 males and 9 females. There were 50 patients with right, 40 with left and 6 patients with bilateral inguinal hernia. Four patients had left sided irreducible inguinal hernia, 2 patients had bilateral recurrent inguinal hernia, 2 patients had right sided recurrent inguinal hernia and 1 patient had left sided recurrent inguinal hernia.There was significant difference in duration of operation (TEP 64.43min) / (TAPP 84.46min), p&lt;0. 001. Total duration of hospital stay and postoperative pain were not significant between patients operated with TEPor TAPP. Accidental pneumoperitoneum was noticed in 8 cases, 10 cases of subcutaneous emphysema, 5 cases of seroma and 1 case of scrotal hematoma in TEP group. In TAPP group scrotal hematoma occurred in 4 cases and seroma in 5 cases which was not significantly different from TEP group.Conclusion: TAPP had significantly longer operating time as compared to TEP. However, there was no significant difference in post-operative pain and hospital stay in both group.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Transabdominal Preperitoneal, Open Mesh Plug and Open Tissue Inguinal Hernia Repair.

There have been few comparisons of the postoperative outcomes of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), open mesh plug (mesh plug) and open tissue (tissue) hernia repair. The objectives of this study were to compare these repair methods. This was a retrospective study of 1813 inguinal hernia patients between January 2008 and December 2016. Of these patients, 474 underwent TAPP repair, 1293 underwent mesh plug repair, and 46 underwent tissue repair. The short-term and long-term outcomes determined by questionnaire were compared among the three groups. In addition, risk factors for patient dissatisfaction were assessed. In the TAPP group, the postoperative complications rate was the lowest at 4.6% (7.4% and 6.5% in the mesh plug and the tissue groups, respectively, P = 0.07), and recurrence rate was lower compared to the mesh plug group (0.8% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.002). As long-term outcomes, 92%, 88% and 75% of patients were satisfied in the TAPP, mesh plug and tissue groups, respectively (P = 0.03). The rate of patients with numbness was 3.1% in the TAPP group, 5.2% in the mesh plug group and 14% in the tissue group (P = 0.04). Predictive independent risk factors for patient dissatisfaction were complications (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.35-11.8, P = 0.012) and infection (OR: 16.9, 95% CI: 1.25-229, P = 0.003). TAPP repair is superior to mesh plug and tissue repairs in terms of complications, satisfaction and numbness, as determined by questionnaire. Complications and infection were independently associated with the patient dissatisfaction.

Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia: A three-armed Randomized controlled trial

PurposeThe best approach for simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernia is controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes after laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia. Methodsthis prospective study included 180 patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia; randomized by sealed envelopes into 3 groups; each includes 60 patients. Group I treated by laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair using 2 separate meshes, Group II treated by open pre-peritoneal (PP) single mesh repair, while Group III treated by bilateral Lichtenstein repair. ResultsIn comparison to open PP and bilateral Lichtenstein repair, Laparoscopic TAPP repair had significantly longer operative time and superior early postoperative outcomes including significantly less postoperative pain, hospital stay, time till return to normal activity and to work. Chronic groin pain and mesh sensation was lower in Laparoscopic TAPP group with significantly higher satisfaction rate compared to open groups. No significant difference between study groups in 3 years recurrence rate. ConclusionSimultaneous laparoscopic TAPP repair of uncomplicated primary bilateral inguinal hernia has superior early postoperative outcome, less chronic pain and higher patients' satisfaction rate compared to open approaches with similar low recurrence rate.