Tranexamic Acid In Spinal Surgery Research Articles

Letter to editor regarding "The Efficacy and Safety of Topical Saline Irrigation with Tranexamic Acid on Perioperative Blood Loss in Patients Treated with PELD".

Letter: We have read the recent article published by Zhang et al titled "The Efficacy and Safety of Topical Saline Irrigation with Tranexamic Acid on Perioperative Blood Loss in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Diskectomy: A Retrospective Study". In this retrospective study, authors performed interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) for L5-S1 disc herniations, categorizing patients into two groups. One group underwent IELD with saline irrigation fluid containing 0.33 gm of tranexamic acid (TXA) per 1L of saline, while the other group received only saline irrigation fluid. We appreciate the authors' efforts in shedding light on the use of TXA in irrigation fluid, which currently has limited literature available. However, we wish to highlight several points of concern that, in our view, warrant further discussion. Upon reviewing the manuscript, our initial concern centers on the reported amount of blood loss, a crucial outcome in this study. The blood loss figures presented in this study appear significantly higher compared to the existing literature. In both study groups, the authors indicate total blood loss (TBL) exceeding 300 ml and intraoperative blood loss (IBL) surpassing 40 ml. In contrast, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Jitpakdee et al. (1) reported a range of blood loss from 10.9 ml to 23.35 ml for interlaminar endoscopic discectomy without any systemic or local use of tranexamic acid. Accurately assessing blood loss in endoscopic spine surgery poses a challenge, and the accuracy of indirect calculation methods is questionable, particularly when bleeding is minimal. Endoscopic discectomy has been proven benefits by minimal tissue damage and negligible blood loss. Another significant concern we would like to address is related to the safety and efficacy of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) use in endoscopic spine surgery. The existing literature generally accepts the safety profile and efficacy of use of intravenous TXA in open spine surgery where the blood loss incurred is substantial (2, 3). However, when it comes to the safety of topical TXA, it is important to note that TXA is known to have neurotoxic and epileptogenic properties when applied to central nervous system (CNS) tissue (5, 6). This is due to its interference with central GABAA receptors and glycine receptors (7). In endoscopic spine surgeries, small dural tears can sometimes go unnoticed due to continuous irrigation fluid pressure. In such cases, the potential CNS side effects associated with topical TXA could pose a real danger. Furthermore, even when dural tears are identified during surgery, it can be challenging to completely washout all the irrigation fluid containing TXA from the surgical field. The accumulation of excessive epidural or intrathecal TXA, especially after a dural tear, can lead to life-threatening conditions such as seizures or arrhythmias, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality in what is often intended as a day-care procedure. Moreover, the authors have not mentioned any exclusion criteria for patients with conditions that are suspected to elevate risk of developing TXA-related side effects, such as a history of thromboembolic events and/or coagulopathy, convulsive disorders and dural disruption. Lastly, in terms of the efficacy of TXA, there are limited studies demonstrating the use of local TXA in spine surgeries to reduce blood loss. For example, Krohn et al(4) used topical TXA irrigation in open instrumented spinal fusion surgery before wound closure. Their study showed a reduction in postoperative blood loss, with drain output decreasing from 525 ml in the non-TXA group to 252 ml in the TXA group. However, it had no significant effect on intraoperative blood loss. We would like to raise a pertinent question regarding endoscopic discectomy procedures, which are characterized by minimal blood loss and are often conducted as day-care surgeries. It becomes a matter of concern whether the potential advantages of using topical TXA in reducing blood loss outweigh the associated risks of neurological damage to the central nervous system (CNS) and other potentially life-threatening complications.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of topical tranexamic acid in spine surgery.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug associated with reduced blood loss in a range of surgical specialties, including neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and cardiac surgery. Concerns about venous thromboembolism and seizures from intravenous (IV) TXA have led to increased use of topical TXA. Given the relative scarcity of the literature on topical TXA compared with that on IV TXA within neurosurgery, the authors aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety, efficacy, and optimal administration of topical TXA in a wide range of spinal procedures and pathologies. The PRISMA guidelines, Cochrane risk of bias tool, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to extract randomized controlled trials and high-quality case-control and cross-sectional/cohort studies (adult studies only) from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase published between 2016 and 2023. Studies were analyzed by two independent reviewers for variables including dosage, TXA administration route, type of spine procedure, blood loss, adverse events including thromboembolism and infection, postoperative hemoglobin level, and hospitalization length. Pooled analysis comparing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin levels, and hospitalization length of stay on the basis of route of TXA administration was conducted. Four cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study, 1 case-control study, and 12 randomized controlled trials, together involving 2045 patients, were included. The most common route of topical TXA administration was via TXA in saline solution. Other routes of topical TXA included retrograde injection and TXA-soaked Gelfoam. In pooled analysis, topical TXA significantly reduced visible blood loss (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.22, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.00001), postoperative blood loss (SMD -1.63, 95% CI -2.03 to -1.22), and length of hospital stay (SMD -1.02, 95% CI -1.42 to -0.61), as well as higher postoperative hemoglobin (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-0.83), compared with non-TXA controls. No significant differences in outcomes were found between topical and IV TXA or between combined (topical and IV) and IV TXA. Thromboembolism and infection rates did not significantly differ between any TXA administration group and non-TXA controls. In pooled analyses, topical TXA was associated with decreased perioperative blood loss in a wide range of scenarios, including cervical spine surgery and thoracolumbar trauma, as well as in patients with a thromboembolic history.

Retracted: Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/9406497.].

Safety and Efficacy of High-Dose Tranexamic Acid in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Institution Series

Currently, tranexamic acid (TXA) is the most widely used antifibrinolytic agent in spine surgery and has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, the safety of high-dose regimens remains in established. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all adult patients who underwent spine surgery with high-dose TXA (50 mg/kg loading dose, mg/kg/h maintenance dose) between September 2019 and March2020. Thirty-six patients were treated with intraoperative high-dose TXA during the study period. The mean age was 56.6 (range: 22-82). Average body mass index was 27.2 (5.1) kg/m2. Average preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3.0 (2.7). The mean number of spinal levels operated on was 6.9 (4.3). Seven cases (19.4%) were revision surgeries. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 587.1 (900.0) mL, and total blood loss was 623.8 (991.9) mL. Postoperatively, time to ambulation was on average 1.7 (1.7) days. The mean total length of stay was 9.8 days (7.9, range 2-41). The most common indication for surgery was tumor (n= 9, 25%), followed by fracture (n= 8, 22.2%), deformity (n= 7, 19.4%), pseudarthrosis (n= 6, 16.7%), and symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (n= 2, 5.6%). There were no thromboembolic or other significant complications among the 36 patients. This retrospective case series demonstrates that the use of high-dose TXA provides is potentially safe and efficacious in adult patients undergoing complex spine surgeries. However, further investigations are required before the true safety and optimal dosing can be determined for high-dose TXA.

Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

On Patient Safety: Concerns About Topical Tranexamic Acid in Spine Surgery.

On Patient Safety: Concerns About Topical Tranexamic Acid in Spine Surgery.

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery.

Objective The safety and effectiveness of topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery has not yet been reached, and further research is needed to confirm it. This study is aimed at detecting the effectiveness and safety on the tranexamic acid in spinal surgery. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and other databases were searched. The search time was from 2016 to 2019. All randomized controlled trials comparing the topical tranexamic acid group and the control group were collected. The experimental group used topical application. Tranexamic acid was used to treat bleeding after spinal surgery. The control group was no tranexamic acid or isotonic saline. The total bleeding, blood transfusion rate, and the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis were compared between the two groups. Rev Man 5.2.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included, including 884 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that the total bleeding volume of the tranexamic acid group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant weighted mean difference ((WMD) = –360.27 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) (–412.68, –307.87) mL, P < 0.00001). The blood transfusion rate in the tranexamic acid group was lower than that in the control group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.22, 95% CI (0.14, 0.33), P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis between the two groups: OR = 1.48, 95% CI (0.41, 5.34), P = 0.55. Conclusion Tranexamic acid can significantly reduce perioperative total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, and blood transfusion rate during spinal surgery but has no significant effect on blood transfusion and thrombosis.

Tranexamic acid dosage for spinal surgery: a meta-analysis.

We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in spinal surgery. We searched relevant academic articles from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed quality, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. RevMan 5.4 was used for data analysis. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria and were identified, including 740 patients. According to the different dose regimens of intravenous TXA, the included studies' patients were divided into the high dose of intravenous TXA group and the low dose of intravenous TXA group. Compared with the low-dose group, the high-dose group can reduce the intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 100.87, 95% CI: [- 147.81, -53.92], P<0.0001). For the postoperative Hb and HCT, the high-dose group can separately maintain 4.54g/dL (MD = 4.54, 95% CI: [2.08, 6.99], P = 0.003) and 1.27% (MD = 1.27, 95% CI: [0.59, 1.94], P = 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences in total blood loss, preoperative Hb and HCT, operative time, and blood transfusion rate between the high-dose group and the low-dose group. Based on the present meta-analysis, compared with the low-dose of intravenous TXA in spinal surgery, the high dose of intravenous TXA decreases the intraoperative blood loss and preserves higher postoperative Hb and HCT levels without increasing the operative time and blood transfusion rate.

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Tranexamic Acid in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fracture Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In this article, the authors systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in surgeries for spinal trauma. Potentially relevant academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Secondary sources were identified from the references of the included literature. RevMan software was used to analyze the pooled data. A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 non-RCTs were included in the review. There were significant differences in total blood loss (standard mean difference [SMD] = -2.54 [95% CI, -3.72, -1.37], P = 0.0001), intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -0.96 [95% CI, -1.28, -0.64], P < 0.00001), postoperative blood loss (SMD = -1.42 [95% CI, -1.72, -1.11], P < 0.00001), and length of hospital stay (SMD = -3.73 [95% CI, -4.41, -3.06], P = 0.00001). No significant differences were found regarding transfusion requirement, operative duration, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism between the 2 groups. The present meta-analysis indicates that the use of TXA in spinal surgery decreases blood loss and duration of hospital stay while not increasing the risk of side effects such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The study aims to provide clinicians who operate on spine trauma with information on the use of tranexamic acid to decrease blood loss and related complications.

Perioperative Medicine: Managing for Outcome, 2nd Edition

Perioperative Medicine: Managing for Outcome, 2nd Edition

Association of tranexamic acid with decreased blood loss in patients undergoing laminectomy and fusion with posterior instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent associated with reduced blood loss and mortality in a wide range of procedures, including spine surgery, traumatic brain injury, and craniosynostosis. Despite this wide use, the safety and efficacy of TXA in spine surgery has been considered controversial due to a relative scarcity of literature and lack of statistical power in reported studies. However, if TXA can be shown to reduce blood loss in laminectomy with fusion and posterior instrumentation, more surgeons may include it in their armamentarium. The authors aimed to conduct an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss in laminectomy and fusion with posterior instrumentation. A systematic review and meta-analysis, abiding by PRISMA guidelines, was performed by searching the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane. These platforms were queried for all studies reporting the use of TXA in laminectomy and fusion with posterior instrumentation. Variables retrieved included patient demographics, surgical indications, involved spinal levels, type of laminectomy performed, TXA administration dose, TXA route of administration, operative duration, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin level, and perioperative complications. Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated using a chi-square test, Cochran's Q test, and I2 test performed with R statistical programming software. A total of 7 articles were included in the qualitative study, while 6 articles featuring 411 patients underwent statistical analysis. The most common route of administration for TXA was intravenous with 15 mg/kg administered preoperatively. After the beginning of surgery, TXA administration patterns were varied among studies. Blood transfusions were increased in non-TXA cohorts compared to TXA cohorts. Patients administered TXA demonstrated a significant reduction in blood loss (mean difference -218.44 mL; 95% CI -379.34 to -57.53; p = 0.018). TXA administration was not associated with statistically significant reductions in operative durations. There were no adverse events reported in either the TXA or non-TXA patient cohorts. TXA can significantly reduce perioperative blood loss in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar laminectomy and fusion procedures, while demonstrating a minimal complication profile.

Oral Is as Effective as Intravenous Tranexamic Acid at Reducing Blood Loss in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

A prospective randomized trial at a university affiliated tertiary medical center between February 2017 and March 2020. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion who were treated with IV versus PO TXA. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) to decrease operative blood loss and allogenic blood transfusions is well documented in the literature. Although evidence supports the use of intravenous (IV) and topical formulations of TXA in spine surgery, the use of oral (PO) TXA has not been studied. A total of 261 patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion were randomized to receive 1.95 g of PO TXA 2 hours preoperatively or 2 g IV TXA (1 g before incision and 1 g before wound closure) intraoperatively. The sample was further stratified into three categories based on number of levels fused (one-to two-level fusions, three to five, and more than five). The primary outcome was the reduction of hemoglobin. Secondary outcomes included calculated blood loss, drain output, postoperative transfusion, complications, and length of hospital stay. Equivalence analysis was performed with a two one-sided test. One hundred thirty-seven patients received IV and 124 received PO TXA. The average age was 62 ± 13 years (mean ± SD), including 141 females and 120 males. Revision cases comprised of 67% of the total sample. Patient demographic factors were similar between groups except for weight, BMI, and preoperative platelet count. The mean reduction of hemoglobin was similar between IV and PO groups (3.56 vs. 3.28 g/dL, respectively; P = 0.002, equivalence). IV TXA group had a higher transfusion rate compared to PO TXA group (22 patients [19%] vs. 12 patients [10%]; P = 0.03). In addition, IV group had longer length of stay (LOS) than PO group (4.4 vs. 3.7 days; P = 0.02). Patients treated with IV and PO TXA experienced the same perioperative blood loss after small and large spinal fusions. In subgroup analysis, the intermediate (three to five level) spinal fusions had less blood loss with PO TXA than IV TXA. Given its lower cost, PO TXA represents a superior alternative to IV TXA in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion and may improve health care cost-efficiency in the studied population.Level of Evidence: 1.

Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery.

Study Design:Broad narrative review.Objective:To review and summarize the current literature on guidelines, outcomes, techniques and indications surrounding multiple modalities of minimizing blood loss in spine surgery.Methods:A thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the guidelines, outcomes, techniques, and indications for multiple modalities of minimizing blood loss in spine surgery.Results:There is a large body of literature that provides a consensus on guidelines regarding the appropriate timing of discontinuation of anticoagulation, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and herbal supplements prior to surgery. Additionally, there is a more heterogenous discussion the utility of preoperative autologous blood donation facilitated by erythropoietin and iron supplementation for healthy patients slated for procedures with high anticipated blood loss and for whom allogeneic transfusion is likely. Intraoperative maneuvers available to minimize blood loss include positioning and maintaining normothermia. Tranexamic acid (TXA), bipolar sealer electrocautery, and topical hemostatic agents, and hypotensive anesthesia (mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg) should be strongly considered in cases with larger exposures and higher anticipated blood loss. There is strong level 1 evidence for the use of TXA in spine surgery as it reduces the overall blood loss and transfusion requirements.Conclusion:As the volume and complexity of spinal procedures rise, intraoperative blood loss management has become a pivotal topic of research within the field. There are many tools for minimizing blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery. The current literature supports combining techniques to use a cost- effective multimodal approach to minimize blood loss in the perioperative period.

Is There a Role for Preoperative Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid in Elective Spine Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Analyzing the Efficacy of Intravenous, Local Infiltration, and Topical Administration of Tranexamic Acid.

Study Design:Randomized control trial.Objective:The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss when administered through various routes in instrumented spine surgeries.Methods:A total of 104 patients undergoing instrumented spine surgery were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 26 in each group). Groups included (1) ivTXA—intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) 1 hour prior to surgery, (2) loTXA—local infiltration of TXA bilaterally into the paraspinal musculature prior to incision, (3) tTXA—topical application of TXA just before wound closure, and (4) control group. Outcome measures included intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and hematological parameters.Results:All the 3 different modes of TXA administration were found to be effective in reducing blood loss in the treated groups compared with the control group. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced in ivTXA (223.6 ± 40.1 mL, P < .0001) and loTXA (256.07 ± 119 mL, P = .0039) groups when compared with controls (344 ± 88.5 mL).The postoperative blood loss was least in tTXA followed by ivTXA, loTXA, and controls. There was 67% reduction in need for blood transfusion in tTXA group, 55.5% reduction in ivTXA group, and 33% reduction in loTXA group when compared with the control group.Conclusion:In instrumented spine surgery, ivTXA and loTXA were found to be equally effective in reducing the intraoperative blood loss. The tTXA has better postoperative blood conserving effects. This is the first study to detail about safety and efficacy on local infiltration of TXA in spine surgery, which is an effective and safe method for reducing intraoperative blood loss.

The use of tranexamic acid in spine surgery.

Patients undergoing surgical procedures of the spine with associated large volume blood loss often require perioperative blood conservation strategies. Synthetic antifibrinolytic medications such as tranexamic acid (TXA) may reduce blood transfusion requirements and postoperative complications following spinal procedures. Studies investigating the role of TXA in spine surgery have presented promising results and have proven its safety and efficacy. However, further investigation is needed to determine the optimal dosing regimen of TXA. In this article, we provide an overview of the basic science and pharmacology of TXA. A comprehensive summary of the findings from clinical trials and a review of the literature that demonstrate the risks and benefits of TXA in spine surgery are also presented.

221. Intravenous and oral tranexamic acid are equivalent at reducing blood loss in thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a prospective randomized trial phase II

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) to decrease operative blood loss and allogenic blood transfusions is well documented in the literature. While evidence supports the use of intravenous (IV) and topical formulations of TXA in spine surgery, the use of oral (PO) TXA has not been studied. PURPOSE The objective of the study is to compare perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion who were treated with IV vs PO TXA. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING A prospective randomized trial of patients enrolled at a university affiliated tertiary medical center between February 2017 and October 2018. PATIENT SAMPLE Enrolled patients were randomly assigned between the 2 treatment groups of IV and oral TXA using a random number algorithm. 90 patients received IV TXA and 81 patients received PO TXA. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the reduction of hemoglobin. Secondary outcomes included calculated blood loss, drain output, postoperative transfusion, complications, and length of hospital stay. METHODS A total of 171 patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion were randomized to receive 1.95g of PO TXA 2 hours preoperatively or 2g IV TXA (1g before incision and 1g before wound closure) intraoperatively. The sample was further stratified into 3 categories based on number of levels fused (1-2 level fusions, 3-5, and >5). Equivalence analysis was performed with a two one-sided test (TOST). A P-value of RESULTS Patient demographic factors were similar between groups except for age, weight and BMI. The mean reduction of hemoglobin was similar between IV and PO groups (3.48 g/dL vs 3.19 g/dL, respectively; P = 0.004, equivalence). Similarly, the calculated blood loss was equivalent (1274 mL vs 1206 mL, respectively; P = 0.001, equivalence). A total of 21 patients (23%) in IV TXA group received a transfusion compared with 10 patients in PO TXA group (13%) (P = 0.07). Two patients (2% and 3% in IV and PO, respectively) in each group experienced a DVT/PE (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with IV and PO TXA experienced the same perioperative blood loss after spinal fusions. Given its lower cost, PO TXA represents an excellent alternative to IV TXA in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion and may improve health care cost-efficiency in the studied population. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS Unavailable from authors at time of publication.

Intravenous and Oral Tranexamic Acid Are Equivalent at Reducing Blood Loss in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

A prospective randomized trial of patients enrolled at a university affiliated tertiary medical center between February and December 2017. To compare perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion who were treated with intravenous (IV) versus oral (PO) tranexamic acid (TXA). The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as TXA to decrease operative blood loss and allogenic blood transfusions is well documented in the literature. While evidence supports the use of IV and topical formulations of TXA in spine surgery, the use of PO TXA has not been studied. Eighty-three patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion were randomized to receive 1.95 g of PO TXA 2 hours preoperatively or 2 g IV TXA (1 g before incision and 1 g before wound closure) intraoperatively. The sample was further stratified into three categories based on number of levels fused (1-2 level fusions, 3-5, and >5). The primary outcome was the reduction of hemoglobin. Secondary outcomes included calculated blood loss, drain output, postoperative transfusion, complications, and length of hospital stay. Equivalence analysis was performed with a two one-sided test (TOST). A P-value of <0.05 suggested equivalence between treatments. Fourty three patients received IV TXA and 40 patients received PO TXA. Patient demographic factors were similar between groups except for body mass index (BMI). The mean reduction of hemoglobin was similar between IV and PO groups (3.36 g/dL vs. 3.43 g/dL, respectively; P = 0.01, equivalence). Similarly, the calculated blood loss was equivalent (1235 mL vs. 1312 mL, respectively; P = 0.02, equivalence). Eight patients (19%) in IV TXA group received a transfusion compared with five patients in PO TXA group (13%) (P = 0.44). One patient (2% and 3% in IV and PO, respectively) in each group experienced a deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (P = 0.96). Patients treated with IV and PO TXA experienced the same perioperative blood loss after spinal fusions. Given its lower cost, PO TXA represents an excellent alternative to IV TXA in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion and may improve healthcare cost-efficiency in the studied population. 1.

The Use of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Surgical Blood Loss: A Review Basic Science, Subspecialty Studies, and The Evolution of Use in Spine Deformity Surgery.

Significant blood loss is often seen in orthopedic surgeries, especially complex spinal procedures that constitute long surgical times, large incisions, and rich blood supplies. Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic analog of the amino acid lysine, has proven to be a cost-effective method in decreasing transfusion rates and avoiding complications associated with low blood volume. Recent data on TXA's use in spine surgery suggest that TXA remains both efficacious and safe, although the ideal dosing and timing of administration is still a point of disagreement. The purpose of this study is to review the literature for the use of TXA in spine surgery to better understand its safety profile and ideal dosage. This narrative review on TXA was conducted on prospective orthopedic studies that used TXA in spine deformity surgery. TXA in adult and pediatric spine surgery has decreased intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, decreasing the need for blood transfusions. The most common dose in the literature is a 10 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 1 mg/kg per hour. Although the proper dosing of TXA for spine surgery remains debatable, studies have proven that TXA is effective at reducing blood loss without increasing the risk of thrombotic events.

Efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytic agents in spinal surgery: a network meta-analysis.

Background:Significant blood loss is still one of the most frequent complications in spinal surgery, which often necessitates blood transfusion. Massive perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion can create additional risks. Aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) are antifibrinolytics currently offered as prophylactic agents to reduce surgery-associated blood loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprotinin, EACA, and low/high doses of TXA in spinal surgery, and assess the use of which agent is the most optimal intervention using the network meta-analysis (NMA) method.Methods:Five electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Web of Science, from the inception to March 1, 2018. Trials that were randomized and compared results between TXA, EACA, and placebo were identified. The NMA was conducted with software R 3.3.2 and STATA 14.0.Results:Thirty randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were analyzed. Aprotinin (standardized mean difference [SMD]=−0.65, 95% credibility intervals [CrI;−1.25, −0.06]), low-dose TXA (SMD = −0.58, 95% CrI [−0.92, −0.25]), and high-dose TXA (SMD = −0.70, 95% CrI [−1.04, −0.36]) were more effective than the respective placebos in reducing intraoperative blood loss. Low-dose TXA (SMD = −1.90, 95% CrI [−3.32, −0.48]) and high-dose TXA (SMD = −2.31, 95% CrI [−3.75, −0.87]) had less postoperative blood loss. Low-dose TXA (SMD = −1.07, 95% CrI [−1.82, −0.31]) and high-dose TXA (SMD = −1.07, 95% CrI [−1.82, −0.31]) significantly reduced total blood loss. However, only high-dose TXA (SMD = −2.07, 95% CrI [−3.26, −0.87]) was more effective in reducing the amount of transfusion, and was significantly superior to low-dose TXA in this regard (SMD = −1.67, 95% CrI [−3.20, −0.13]). Furthermore, aprotinin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.16, 95% CrI [0.05, 0.54]), EACA (OR = 0.46, 95% CrI [0.22, 0.97]) and high dose of TXA (OR = 0.34, 95% CrI [0.19, 0.58]) had a significant reduction in transfusion rates. Antifibrinolytics did not show a significantly increased risk of postoperative thrombosis. Results of ranking probabilities indicated that high-dose TXA had the greatest efficacy and a relatively high safety level.Conclusions:The antifibrinolytic agents are able to reduce perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement during spine surgery. And the high-dose TXA administration might be used as the optimal treatment to reduce blood loss and transfusion.

Topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a commonly used antifibrinolytic agent for perioperative blood conservation in several surgical specialties. Although historically administered intravenously, such systemic administration may be accompanied by severe side effects. Thus, the topical usage of TXA has been established in several fields but remains poorly evaluated in spine surgery. In this study, the authors aimed to review the medical literature on topical TXA usage in spine surgery to evaluate its safety and efficacy. We reviewed manuscripts and clinical trials exploring topical TXA usage in spine surgery published by April 1st, 2018. Postoperative blood loss volumes and hospitalization lengths of stay were evaluated with separate meta-analyses. We identified five articles and one unpublished clinical trial that were placebo-controlled and comprised 218 patients receiving topical TXA in spine surgery. Patients receiving topical TXA demonstrated significantly lower postoperative blood loss as compared to the placebo group (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] 2.21, 95% CI 0.79–3.62, p < 0.001) and had a lower hospitalization duration (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.49–1.49, p < 0.001). Overall, topical TXA favorably reduced postoperative blood loss and hospitalization duration in patients undergoing spinal surgery. However, further randomized controlled trials will be needed to definitively establish the optimal therapeutic doses needed for hemorrhage management, and the pharmacodynamics of tTXA in spinal surgery.