Training In Implantology Research Articles

Impact of fully guided implant planning software training on the knowledge acquisition and satisfaction of dental undergraduate students

ABSTRACT Background A majority of dental school students do not undergo hands-on clinical training in implantology in the undergraduate curriculum. Training is usually restricted to pre-implant evaluation and post-implant prostheses. Virtual implant planning software (VIPS) provides an alternative opportunity for undergraduate students to experience implant planning much before gaining hands-on experience. However, not many studies have the contribution of VIPS to the knowledge acquisition of students. We conducted a preliminary study to evaluate the knowledge acquisition of the students when exposed to a hands-on session of VIPS. We also evaluated students’ satisfaction levels, when exposed to hands-on training in fully guided implant planning software. Methods A two-part theory lecture on fully guided implant planning was delivered to 90, 5th (final)-year dental undergraduate students by the oral radiology faculty. The students were then randomly divided into three groups. Group A was exposed to didactic lectures only. Group B was shown a video for fully guided implant planning in addition to the didactic lecture. Group C was shown a video for fully guided implant planning in addition to a didactic lecture and then performed a hands-on session of virtual implant planning under faculty guidance. Students from all groups were given an MCQ-based test. After the completion of the test students from group A and B also received VIPS hands-on training. Students from all three groups answered and a feedback questionnaire regarding their satisfaction levels with VIPS. Results The overall test score of students in Group C was higher than their colleagues in both Groups A and B and the differences were statistically significant (p = 0.01). More than 85% of the students were satisfied with the teaching approach. Conclusions The utilization of VIPS in the training of dental undergraduate students improves their performance confirming better knowledge acquisition and content mastery.

Knowledge and attitude in implant dentistry training courses amongst undergraduate dental students at Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Due to the increase of implant treatments in daily practice, graduates should be well acquainted with appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge in implantology. This study sought to assess the knowledge and attitude of undergraduate students towards the benefits of their courses in the implant dentistry curriculum. This survey study was performed on all senior dental students at Pardis International Campus, School of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data collection was carried out through a questionnaire containing various items on knowledge and attitude. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were already approved. Collected data were coded, entered in Microsoft Excel 2019, and analysed by t-test (α=.05). Forty questionnaires were filled out by 28 female and 12 male students. Only 7.5% and 12.5% of students reported that they had adequate knowledge to conduct the surgical and prosthetic steps of dental implant treatment, respectively. The majority of students had a positive attitude towards the quality of theoretical education. However, less than 50% of them perceived the same about their practical education. No significant difference existed between male and female students regarding their responses to the knowledge and attitude questions (p=.458 and p=.288, respectively). Ninety percent of the students felt the need for further education regarding dental implant treatment in the undergraduate curriculum. Despite the satisfaction of the theoretical knowledge, most senior students believed that they did not achieve adequate expertise to practice after graduation and were willing to receive further practical training in implantology.

Training in Implantology and Decision-Making Practices Regarding Edentulism: An Internet-Based Survey.

To evaluate the first-choice treatment options proposed to edentulous patients and the rationale behind them using an internet-based survey conducted among a sample of French dental clinicians. From July to December 2018, an internet-based survey was conducted among a sample of 2,000 dental practitioners in order to assess first-choice treatment options proposed to edentulous patients. A total of 349 responses were received, and 310 questionnaires were included for analysis. The majority of clinicians proposed a maxillary complete denture (CD) (59.7%) and mandibular implant overdenture (45.2%) for edentulous patients. Almost 30% of practitioners proposed a CD as the first-choice option for mandibular edentulous patients. Binary logistic regression showed that the likelihood of proposing implant therapy in the maxilla was significantly increased for male practitioners (OR = 2.041, 95% CI = 1.231 to 3.385, P < .05) and for clinicians who had further training in implantology (OR = 2.301, 95% CI = 1.354 to 3.917, P < .05). In the mandible, the likelihood was significantly increased for clinicians who graduated 10 to 19 years ago (OR = 5.312, 95% CI = 1.331 to 21.208, P < .05), had further training in implantology (OR = 2.246, 95% CI = 1.121 to 4.500, P < .05), had expectations of comfort and stability (OR = 11.810, 95% CI =5.289 to 26.372, P < .001), and proposed the treatment according to national and international recommendations (OR = 3.252, 95% CI = 1.208 to 8.755, P < .05). The research results suggest that proposing either a CD or implant restorations for treatment of edentulous patients depends on training and specific skills in implantology.

Interest in dental implantology and preferences for implant therapy: a survey of Victorian dentists.

The purpose of this study was to gauge dentists' interest, knowledge and training in implantology, and to compare their treatment preferences with current literature. Subsequently, this information may be used to evaluate implantology education pathways. A cross-sectional postal survey of 600 randomly selected dentists registered with the Dental Practice Board of Victoria was conducted. Respondents were asked about background, interest and training in implantology, and implant treatment preferences. Results were analysed according to primary practice location, decade of graduation and attendance at continuing professional development (CPD) programmes. One hundred and seventy-six questionnaires were included for analysis. In general, dentists rate their implant knowledge, interest and enjoyment in restoring implants favourably. No differences were found between city and country practitioners, and different graduation decades. The level of CPD significantly influenced treatment preferences. Practitioners were generally unwilling to treat patients taking bisphosphonates, or to perform grafting procedures. Most dentists provide common services to treat peri-implant conditions. Direct-to-fixture is the most popular fixture-abutment connection. Overall, there is a high level of implant knowledge corresponding to current evidence in the literature. Level of CPD attendance is the most important factor in dentists' willingness to provide more implant therapy options.

Implantology training opportunities in the United Kingdom

Implantology training opportunities in the United Kingdom

EFP Delphi study on the trends in Periodontology and Periodontics in Europe for the year 2025.

The aim was to assess the potential trends in Periodontology and Periodontics in Europe that might be anticipated by the year 2025, using the Delphi method. The expert opinion of 120 experts was sought through the use of an open-ended questionnaire, developed by an advisory group, containing 40 questions concerning the various trends in periodontology. The experts (113 responders) expect a stabilization of the prevalence of periodontitis, both for the chronic as well as the aggressive cases, but an increase in implant-related diseases up to the year 2025. Concurrently, the importance of implants is seen to be increasing. They foresee an increased demand for postgraduate periodontology and implantology training. This is mirrored in an increase in publications for implant dentistry and increase in demand and need for training. Concerning the patients, better-informed individuals seeking more routine check-ups are expected. A continued need for specialized periodontists, but also well trained dental practitioners is foreseen for next decade in Europe. Apart from periodontology they will be increasingly exposed to and trained in implant dentistry.

Relative Contribution of Haptic Technology to Assessment and Training in Implantology

Background. The teaching of implant surgery, as in other medical disciplines, is currently undergoing a particular evolution. Aim of the Study. To assess the usefulness of haptic device, a simulator for learning and training to accomplish basic acts in implant surgery. Materials and Methods. A total of 60 people including 40 third-year dental students without knowledge in implantology (divided into 2 groups: 20 beginners and 20 experiencing a simulator training course) and 20 experienced practitioners (experience in implantology >15 implants) participated in this study. A basic exercise drill was proposed to the three groups to assess their gestural abilities. Results. The results of the group training with the simulator tended to be significantly close to those of the experienced operators. Conclusion. Haptic simulator brings a real benefit in training for implant surgery. Long-term benefit and more complex exercises should be evaluated.

Is It Ethical for a Specialist to Demonstrate Surgical Techniques to a General Dentist Untrained in the Procedure So That the Dentist Can Perform These Procedures on His or Her Own?

Is It Ethical for a Specialist to Demonstrate Surgical Techniques to a General Dentist Untrained in the Procedure So That the Dentist Can Perform These Procedures on His or Her Own?

Survey of Implant Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Programs in the United States

The status of implant training in US oral and maxillofacial surgery programs has been reported previously based on data gathered from residency program directors. Since the time of those earlier surveys, however, many new technological and surgical developments have occurred in implant therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current status of implant training in oral and maxillofacial surgery residency programs in the United States. E-mail invitations were sent to 559 resident members of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons asking them to participate in an online survey between January 23 and February 6, 2006. Each survey invitation was assigned a unique URL so that each resident could respond only once to the survey during the specified interval. The survey contained 17 questions assessing various aspects of training in implant placement. A total of 201 completed surveys were received by the specified deadline. The participation rate was roughly similar in residents of 4-year certificate programs and those of 6-year MD combined programs (56% vs 44%). In total, 48% of residents reported receiving less than 20 hours of didactic training in implantology per year, and 57% reported using 2 or fewer implant systems. Some 57% estimated that they would place fewer than 20 implants in the coming year, whereas 52% reported that they would place more than 50 implants during their residency. Interestingly, 98% of the residents reported that implant dentistry would be an important part of their practice, but 28% felt inadequately prepared by residency training. There is a broad range of experience in implant training in US oral and maxillofacial surgery residency programs. Almost all oral and maxillofacial surgery residents feel that implant dentistry will be an important part of their practice; however, many residents feel that their training during residency has not adequately prepared them for implant surgery. Our findings identify a potential need for additional training in implant surgery during oral and maxillofacial surgery residency.

Implantology training for the whole dental team

The Diploma in Implant Dentistry, one of the flagship programmes for dentists, now includes a training module and study weekend for the whole dental team. Sally Hunter tells us about this latest initiative from the FGDP(UK).

The status of implant training in oral and maxillofacial surgery residency programs

Purpose: The results of a survey concerning the status of oral and maxillofacial surgery resident training in oral implantology are discussed. Results: The results demonstrate that oral and maxillofacial surgery residents are exposed to a variety of implant types and systems, with most implant surgery being performed in association with intravenous sedation. The number of implants placed by each resident during training varied greatly. Conclusion: Most program directors believe that the implantology training of oral and maxillofacial surgery residents is superior or comparable to that of periodontal graduate students. However, this survey suggests that certain aspects of residency training in implantology, such as the performance of sinus lift procedures and participation in implant research, may require more emphasis.