Recent Articles Takeshi Sakamoto, Joanna Maciulewicz, Donald R. Wehrs, Donald R. Wehrs, Robert G. Walker, Neil Guthrie, Christopher D. Johnson, Melvyn New, Melvyn New, Christopher D. Johnson, Neil Guthrie, Neil Guthrie, Robert G. Walker, Robert G. Walker, Christopher D. Johnson, Christopher D. Johnson, Christopher D. Johnson, Christopher D. Johnson, Christopher D. Johnson, Jakub Lipski, and Joanna Maciulewicz ADDISON Bernard, Stephen. “The First Advertisement for the Spectator,” N&Q, 66 (2019), 91–92. Discovered in the British Library and printed here is “a small paper ticket (there were no newspaper advertisements for the journal that day),” the first lines of which read, “To Morrow will be publish’d / A Paper intitled, / The SPECTATOR / which will be continued every / Day.” Two paragraphs summarize the rather astounding popularity (and proliferation of editions) from the modest beginning on March 1, 1711 through Bond’s scholarly edition (Clarendon, 1965), justifying Bernard’s conclusion that the advertisement is “remarkable . . . for its lack of presumption, and possibly for its lack of foreknowledge of what this journal would turn out to be.” Bernard, Stephen. “The Bibliographical History of the Spectator,” eBLJ (2019). Online. Bernard has compiled a thorough and valuable “bibliography of editions of and selections from The Spectator,” from the first complete edition, published by Jacob Tonson beginning in 1712, to the 2014 online version of Donald F. Bond’s standard modern edition, first issued in 1965. Included are British Library shelfmarks, as well as links to editions available in digital facsimile on ECCO. As Bernard suggests in his brief headnote, there is much work left to be done on the reception of Addison and Steele’s most influential periodical. Some light on this area will presumably be shed by the imminent edition from Oxford University Press of the Non-Periodical Works of Addison, edited by Paul Davies and Henry Power, with an accompanying volume of scholarly essays. Perhaps a boom in Addison studies lies ahead. Strawn, Morgan. “Addison’s Anglican Rationalism, Cato’s Tragic Flaw, and Stoicism,” 1650–1850, 24 (2019), 32–53. Strawn covers some well-traveled ground in order to weigh Stoicism against Anglicanism and find Cato a flawed hero. It served Anglican apologists to equate Dissenters (and religious enthusiasm more generally) with Stoic asceticism, for example, and it served Christians more generally to denigrate all classical philosophy as pre-Revelation and hence culpable. To the contrary, Cato was long celebrated for self-discipline and dedication to freedom, so ambivalence was built into Addison’s drama. Against Addison’s “joyful Christianity,” there was Cato’s melancholy and obsessive nature; against Anglicanism’s awareness of conscience’s fallibility was Cato’s certainty concerning the righteousness of his behavior. Cato’s suicide of course raises yet another barrier between classical and Christian thought. Still, Strawn faces an uphill battle in finding this ambivalence reflected in Addison’s drama. To be sure, as a tragic hero under siege, Cato could not exhibit the “pious cheerfulness” of the Spectator’s version of Christian morality. Rather, he [End Page 3] exhibits the melancholy we might associate with other tragic heroes, from Oedipus to Hamlet; that this connects Cato to the melancholic obsessiveness of Swift’s portraits of religious enthusiasm seems a bit strained. Even Cato’s response to his son’s death seems more an attempt by Addison to reach toward the excess of tragic sublimity rather than a manifestation of monomania. Cato is certain of his righteousness, unlike some ideal Christians who accept the fallibility of conscience, but such acceptance also undercuts the tradition of martyrdom, prevalent in both Catholic and Anglican communion. Strawn uses a 1928 edition of the play; he would have been better served by consulting the very good 2004 edition, edited by Christine Dunn Henderson and Mark E. Yellin (Liberty Fund), which includes more than thirty essays by Addison that reflect on his portrait of Cato and its political context. ASTELL Tann, Donovan. “Ascetic Cosmopolitanism: Imagining Religious Retreat in Mary Astell’s A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Parts I and II and Letters Concerning the Love of God,” 1650–1850, 24 (2019), 305–327. Astell’s commitment to rigid Anglicanism has disturbed critics casting her...
Read full abstract