Traditional Medicare Research Articles

Incentivizing Network Adequacy in Medicare Advantage.

This Viewpoint discusses enrollment in Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare among older adults and common reasons for plan disenrollment, including the lack of in-network physicians and hospitals.

Commercial prices and their influence on urology practices: Prostate cancer care among men with Medicare.

For men with prostate cancer, there is substantial variation in the use of conservative management, such as active surveillance. Commercial prices, which vary across urology practices, may afford incentives that foster physician behaviors associated with utilization. Such behaviors may "spillover" to the Medicare population and affect quality. This study evaluated the effects of practice-level commercial prices on health care utilization and quality in men with prostate cancer insured by traditional Medicare. From a 20% Medicare sample, the authors identified men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2014-2019 (n=44,653). Using commercial payments from the MarketScan database, they developed a practice-level commercial price index (ratio of commercial prices to Medicare prices). They examined the association of the price index with price standardized spending, overtreatment (treatment among those with >50% noncancer mortality within 10 years), and underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance (at least one prostate-specific antigen test and one confirmatory test-MRI, prostate biopsy, genomic test-within 12 months of diagnosis). Practice-level commercial price indices varied from 1.34 (134% of Medicare prices), for practices in the bottom decile, to 3.00, for practices in the top decile. Increasing price index was associated with lower odds of overtreatment (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.97; p=.01), but not price standardized spending or underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance. Commercial prices vary markedly across urology practices. Among newly diagnosed men with traditional Medicare, those managed by practices with higher commercial price indices had lower odds of overtreatment, suggesting improved prostate cancer care quality.

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare

Compared with traditional Medicare (TM), Medicare Advantage (MA) insurers have greater financial incentives to reduce the delivery of low-value services (LVS); however, there is limited evidence at a national level on the prevalence of LVS utilization among MA vs TM beneficiaries and whether LVS utilization rates vary among the largest MA insurers. To determine whether there are differences in the rates of LVS delivered to Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MA vs TM, overall and by the 7 largest MA insurers. This cross-sectional study included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older residing in the US in 2018 with complete demographic information. Eligible TM beneficiaries were enrolled in Parts A, B, and D, and eligible MA beneficiaries were enrolled in Part C with Part D coverage. Data analysis was conducted between February 2022 and August 2024. Medicare plan type. The primary outcome was utlization of 35 LVS defined by the Milliman Health Waste Calculator. An overdispersed Poisson regression model was used to calculate estimated margins comparing risk-adjusted rates of LVS in TM vs MA, overall and across the 7 largest MA insurers. The study sample included 3 671 364 unique TM beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 75.7 [7.7] years; 1 502 631 female [40.9%]) and 2 299 618 unique MA beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 75.3 [7.3] years; 983 592 female [42.8%]). LVS utilization was lower among those enrolled in MA compared with TM (50.02 vs 52.48 services per 100 beneficiary-years; adjusted absolute difference, -2.46 services per 100 beneficiary-years; 95% CI, -3.16 to -1.75 services per 100 beneficiary-years; P < .001). Within MA, LVS utilization was lower among beneficiaries enrolled in HMOs vs PPOs (48.03 vs 52.66 services per 100 beneficiary-years; adjusted absolute difference, -4.63 services per 100 beneficiary-years; 95% CI, -5.53 to -3.74 services per 100 beneficiary-years; P < .001). While MA beneficiaries enrolled in UnitedHealth, Humana, Centene, and smaller MA insurers had lower rates of LVS compared with those in TM, beneficiaries enrolled in CVS, Cigna, and Anthem showed no differences. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association plans had higher rates of LVS compared with TM. In this cross-sectional study of nearly 6 million Medicare beneficiaries, utilization of LVS was on average lower among MA beneficiaries compared with TM beneficiaries, possibly owing to stronger financial incentives in MA to reduce LVS; however, meaningful differences existed across some of the largest MA insurers, suggesting that MA insurers may have variable ability to influence LVS reduction.

Dental Coverage for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Poor oral health has been associated with various systemic diseases (e.g., endocarditis, pneumonia, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes) and decreased quality of life. When enacted in 1965, Medicare excluded coverage for comprehensive dental services. As of 2023, Medicare has allowed coverage of limited dental services inextricably linked to specific medical conditions. Many Medicare Advantage plans (Medicare Part C) offer dental coverage. Yet in 2019, approximately 24 million Medicare beneficiaries (47% of all Medicare enrollees), lacked dental coverage. Seventy-one percent of traditional Medicare enrollees (those not enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan) reported that high cost was the primary reason that they did not obtain dental care. The importance of oral health for the older adults has been the main reason that a national interprofessional consortium, which includes several national nursing organizations, has been advocating for legislation to expand Medicare to include dental coverage. The consortium's efforts have been thwarted by fierce opposition from the American Dental Association and many Republican legislators. Given the vital role that nurses and advanced practice nurses play in caring for the nation's older adults and disabled, nursing's voice needs to be strengthened as leaders in advocating for inclusion of dental benefits in traditional Medicare.

Impact of skilled nursing facility quality on Medicare beneficiaries with dementia: Evidence from vacancies.

People living with dementia are less likely to be admitted to high-rated nursing homes than people without dementia, despite their increased care needs. We investigated the effect of admission to nursing homes with higher staffing ratings on adverse outcomes for individuals with and without dementia post-hospitalization. Among Traditional Medicare beneficiaries discharged to nursing homes between 2011 and 2017, we examined the relationship between facility staffing star-ratings and short-term readmission and mortality using an instrumental variables approach to account for selection bias. The instrumental variables were the number of nearby vacant beds in high-rated facilities. Admission to a higher-rated nursing home lowered post-discharge mortality risk at 90 days and reduced 30- and 90-day readmission. Point estimates were larger for people with dementia. Findings underscore the need for enhancing direct care staffing in nursing homes and addressing access disparities, particularly for individuals with dementia who benefit significantly from high-quality care. We assessed how admission to nursing homes with higher staffing ratings impacted outcomes for individuals with and without dementia by exploiting variation in local bed vacancies as a source of quasi-random assignment. For both persons with and without dementia, adjusted short-term mortality and readmission rates were lower among those discharged to nursing homes with higher staffing ratings. Effects were larger for persons with dementia, indicating welfare loss from inequitable access to higher-rated nursing homes. Increasing staffing in nursing homes and reducing disparities for persons with dementia is essential for enhancing both equity and value.

Racial/ethnic disparities in cost-related barriers to care among near-poor beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare.

To compare racial and ethnic disparities in cost-related medical care and dental care barriers and use of vision care among near-poor Medicare beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage (MA) vs traditional Medicare (TM) overall and stratified by supplemental insurance enrollment. Cross-sectional analysis of 2015-2019 data from the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Propensity score-weighted difference-in-disparities analyses comparing Black-White and Hispanic-White disparities in MA vs TM among near-poor Medicare beneficiaries with incomes between 101% and 250% of the federal poverty level. We assessed differences in cost-related medical care barriers and cost-related dental care barriers as well as receipt of annual eye exams in MA vs TM. For cost-related barriers to medical care, Hispanic-White disparities were narrower by 8.8 (95% CI, -14.0 to -3.6) percentage points in MA relative to TM but differences in Black-White disparities were not statistically significant. MA was not associated with narrower differences in Hispanic-White or Black-White disparities in dental care access. Higher proportions of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries in MA received an annual eye exam vs White beneficiaries in both MA and TM. MA was associated with narrower racial disparities primarily compared with TM without supplemental insurance. Among near-poor Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries, MA was associated with greater use of vision care and narrowing of some disparities in cost-related access barriers vs TM. However, MA did not uniformly narrow racial/ethnic disparities in access and use. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining and enhancing features of Medicare coverage that may promote equitable access to care, including additional benefits and lower cost sharing.

Medigap-guaranteed issue associated with Medicare Advantage disenrollment for beneficiaries administered a part B drug.

While many Medicare beneficiaries are enrolling in Medicare Advantage (MA), some beneficiaries may want to return to traditional Medicare and purchase Medigap, especially beneficiaries who have greater medical needs. Beyond minimal federal regulations, states impose additional regulations that impact Medigap affordability. Beneficiaries in some states have greater difficulty obtaining Medigap coverage because the states where they live allow Medigap insurers to experience rate the beneficiary, which can make Medigap insurance prohibitively expensive. We examined beneficiaries who received physician-administered drugs, which can be expensive and subject to high cost sharing, to see if disenrollment from MA for these beneficiaries was greater in states with Medigap consumer protection policy levels. In 2020, we find a 1.0% average baseline average probability of MA disenrollment. For beneficiaries who received a physician-administered drug in our sample, the probability of MA disenrollment is 3.7 (95% CI, 2.6-4.8; P < .001) percentage points higher in Medigap-guaranteed issue states compared with states with no protections. We find a greater association between MA disenrollment and Medigap protection policies with higher cost drugs. These findings suggest that beneficiaries who receive a high-volume and high-spending physician-administered drug are more likely to disenroll from MA back to traditional Medicare when Medigap is more affordable.

The Impact of Closing Medicare Part D Coverage Gap on Mental Health of Adults Over Age 65.

Using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2006 to 2019, this study assessed the effect of closing Medicare Part D coverage gap on mental health of older adults. We employed difference-in-differences and compared mental health outcomes of older adults on Medicare with those on private insurance before and after the 2011 policy change. Findings showed a 0.447-point reduction in the Kessler Index 6 (K-6) score after closure. These findings were mainly attributable to women, Hispanics, individuals with multiple chronic conditions, and those in Traditional Medicare. A reduction in out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures appeared to be the primary mechanism for this finding. Our analysis was robust to several specifications, including using different measures of mental health and alternate constructions of treatment and control groups. The closure of the Medicare Part D coverage gap improved mental health among beneficiaries, potentially by reducing financial strain associated with high OOP expenditures.

Benzodiazepine Utilization in Ischemic Stroke Survivors: Analyzing Initial Excess Supply and Longitudinal Trends.

Benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed for post-acute ischemic stroke for anxiety, insomnia, and agitation. While guidelines discourage use in those aged ≥65 years, little is known about prescription patterns at the national level. We analyzed a 20% sample of US Medicare claims from April 1, 2013, to September 30, 2021. We selected beneficiaries aged ≥65 years discharged alive following an acute ischemic stroke who had traditional Medicare coverage and 6 months' prior enrollment in Parts A (hospital insurance), B (Medical insurance), and D (drug coverage). We excluded those with prior benzodiazepine prescriptions, self-discharges, or discharge to skilled nursing facilities. We examined demographics, comorbidities, first prescription days' supply, cumulative incidences of benzodiazepine first prescription fills within 90 days after discharge, and geographic and yearly trends. We included 126 050 beneficiaries with a mean age of 78 years (SD, 8); 54% were female and 82% were White. Within 90 days, 6127 (4.9%) initiated a benzodiazepine. Among new prescriptions, lorazepam (40%) and alprazolam (33%) were the most prescribed. Most (76%) of first fills had a day's supply over 7 days and 55% between 15 and 30 days. Female initiation rates were higher (5.5% [95% CI, 5.3-5.7]) than male initiation rates (3.8% [95% CI, 3.6%-3.9%]). Rates were highest in the southeast (5.1% [95% CI, 4.8%-5.3%]) and lowest in the midwest (4.0% [95% CI, 3.8%-4.3%]), with a modest nationwide initiation decline from 2013 to 2021 (cumulative incidence difference, 1.6%). Despite a gradual decline in benzodiazepine initiation from 2013 to 2021, we noted excessive supplies in prescriptions post-acute ischemic stroke discharge, underscoring the need for improved policies.

Financial burden of care greatest among rural beneficiaries in Medicare advantage.

To examine differences in access to care and financial burden between Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries in rural and urban areas and then explore whether there were potential differences in MA benefits between urban and rural areas. We conducted a cross-sectional study within the Medicare setting in the United States. Data from three distinct sources for 2017-2021: the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, the MA landscape data, and the Plan Benefit Package data. Our sample comprised 43,343 Medicare beneficiary-years, including TM and MA beneficiaries in urban and rural areas. Our adjusted analysis showed that rural MA beneficiaries experienced higher rates of delayed care due to costs (10.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.8-11.1]) compared with rural TM (9.5% [8.8-10.2]), urban MA (7.9% [7.4-8.4]), and urban TM (7.9% [7.5-8.2]) beneficiaries. Similarly, rural MA beneficiaries (11.4% [95% CI: 10.3-12.5]) reported more difficulty paying medical bills compared with rural TM (9.4% [8.7-10.1]), urban MA (8.1% [7.7-8.6]), and urban TM (7.8% [7.5-8.2]) beneficiaries. This disparity was associated with less generous financial structures in rural MA plans. Compared to urban MA plans, rural MA plans offered lower out-of-pocket maximums for in-network care ($5918 vs. $5439), but required higher copayments ($1686 vs. $1724 for a 5-day hospitalization, $37 vs. $41 for a specialist visit, and $35 vs. $38 for a mental health visit). However, differences in quality of care and provision of supplemental benefits were small. Rural Medicare beneficiaries reported a greater financial burden of care than urban Medicare beneficiaries, but the most significant burden was observed among MA beneficiaries in rural areas. One possible mechanism could be the less generous financial structures offered by rural MA plans. These findings suggest the need for policies addressing the affordability of care for rural MA beneficiaries.

Variation in Overactive Bladder Treatment Type by Social Determinants of Health

Importance There is limited understanding of the relationship between social determinants of health (SDOH) and types of overactive bladder/urgency urinary incontinence (OAB/UUI) treatments. Objectives Our objective was to determine if OAB/UUI treatment type differs by SDOH, including insurance and estimated median household income (EMHI). Study Design This was a cross-sectional study of adult patients assigned female at birth with OAB/UUI, identified from 2017 to 2022 within a tertiary academic health system. The primary outcome was any OAB/UUI treatment provision. Secondary outcomes included specific treatments and specialty care. We examined associations between SDOH and OAB/UUI treatments using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 33,002 patients with OAB/UUI, 15.4% received treatment. Treatment provision was associated with American Indian/Alaska Native or Black/African American race, Latina ethnicity, Medicaid, low-income Medicare, or Medicare Advantage (vs private insurance) and EMHI ranging from $26,500 to $100,000 (compared with EMHI &gt;$100,000). Patients with Black/African American race, Medicaid or no insurance, and EMHI ≤$80,000 had higher odds of anticholinergic prescription and lower odds of β3-agonist prescription. Advanced therapy was associated with traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and EMHI $26,500–$100,000 and negatively associated with Asian race. Specialty care was associated with Black/African American race, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, no insurance, and EMHI ≤$80,000. Conclusions Overactive bladder/urgency urinary incontinence treatment provision was associated with American Indian/Alaska Native and Black/African American race, Latina ethnicity, Medicaid, low-income Medicare, or Medicare Advantage insurance. Patients with Black/African American race and with lower EMHI had higher odds of receiving anticholinergic therapy and lower odds of receiving β3-agonist medication, despite higher likelihood of specialty care.

Use of Hearing Services in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage

Use of Hearing Services in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage

Community-Level Social Vulnerability and Hip and Knee Joint Replacement Surgery Receipt Among Medicare Enrollees With Arthritis.

(1) Explore associations between county minority health social vulnerability index (MH-SVI) and total joint replacement (TJR), and (2) assess associations by individual-level race/ethnicity. An expanded understanding of relevant social determinants of health is essential to inform policies and practices that promote equitable access to hip and knee TJR. Retrospective cohort study of Medicare enrollees. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data were linked with MH-SVI. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the odds of TJR according to the MH-SVI quartile in which enrollees resided. A total of 10,471,413 traditional Medicare enrollees in 2018 aged 67 years or older with arthritis. The main outcome was enrollee primary TJR during hospitalization. The main exposure was the MH-SVI (composite and 6 themes) for the county of enrollee residence. Results were stratified by enrollee race/ethnicity. Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander (AANHPI), Black or African American (Black), and Hispanic enrollees comparatively had 26%-41% lower odds of receiving TJR than White enrollees. Residing in counties within the highest quartile of composite and socioeconomic status vulnerability measures were associated with lower TJR overall and by race/ethnicity. Residing in counties with increased medical vulnerability for Black and White enrollees, housing type and transportation vulnerability for AANHPI and Hispanic enrollees, minority status and language theme for AANHPI enrollees, and household composition vulnerability for White enrollees were also associated with lower TJR. Higher levels of social vulnerability were associated with lower TJR. However, the association varied by individual race/ethnicity. Implementing multisectoral strategies is crucial for ensuring equitable access to care.

Association of Participation in Medicare's Oncology Care Model With Spending, Utilization, and Quality Outcomes Among Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage Members.

The Oncology Care Model (OCM), a value-based payment model for traditional Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, yielded total spending reductions that were outweighed by incentive payments, resulting in net losses to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We studied whether the OCM yielded spillover effects in total episode spending, utilization, and quality among commercially insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) members, who were not targeted by the program. This observational study used administrative claims from a large national payer, yielding 157,189 total patients with commercial insurance or MA with solid malignancies who initiated 229,376 systemic anticancer therapy episodes before (2012-2015) and during (2016-2021) the OCM at 125 OCM-participating practices (a subset of total OCM practices) and a 1:10 propensity-matched set of 860 non-OCM practices. We used difference-in-differences analyses to assess the association between the OCM and total episode spending, defined as medical spending during a 6-month episode. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization and emergency department (ED) utilization and quality measures. From the pre-OCM to the OCM period, mean total episode payments increased from $45,504 in US dollars (USD) to $46,239 USD for OCM-participating practices, and increased from $50,519 USD to $58,591 USD for non-OCM practices (adjusted difference-in-differences -$6,287 USD [95% CI, -$10,076 USD to -$2,498 USD], P = .001). The OCM was associated with adjusted spending decreases for both high-risk (-$6,756 USD [95% CI, -$10,731 USD to -$2,781 USD], P = .001) and low-risk (-$4,171 USD [95% CI, -$7,799 USD to -$543 USD], P = .025) episodes. OCM-associated spending reductions were strongest for outpatient (-$5,243 USD [95% CI, -$8,589 USD to -$1,897 USD], P = .002) and infused/injected anticancer drug (-$3,031 USD [95% CI, -$5,193 USD to -$869 USD], P = .006) spending. There were no associations between OCM participation and changes in hospital or ED utilization nor quality of care. The OCM was associated with reductions in spending for nontargeted members, a spillover effect.

Skilled home healthcare utilization and outcomes for older adults with dementia: A scoping review.

This study aims to summarize the existing research literature examining Medicare-skilled home health (HH) utilization and clinical outcomes for persons with dementia (PwD). We sought to answer the following questions: (1) How is dementia defined and classified in the HH literature? (2) What associations have been observed between dementia status and patterns of HH utilization? (3) What associations have been observed between dementia status and HH outcomes? Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and select relevant journals for quantitative studies conducted in the United States between 2000 and 2023 examining Medicare HH use and outcomes for PwD. We describe and compare approaches to classify dementia, identify findings related to HH utilization and outcomes supported by the preponderance of evidence, and comment on existing gaps and areas of ambiguity in the literature. Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Most used claims-based data to classify dementia, leveraged national data, and were limited to traditional Medicare beneficiaries. Studies found meaningful differences in HH utilization by dementia status; most notably, PwD were more likely to access HH without a preceding hospitalization, had longer lengths of stay, and incurred higher HH costs. Literature relating to clinical outcomes was more difficult to interpret, due to significant variation in study objectives, samples, and outcome measures which prompted more nuanced and even contradictory conclusions. There is a dearth of research identifying how specific HH care pathways (e.g., service types, visit frequency) impact outcomes for this patient population. This review supports the understanding that PwD are a unique subpopulation of HH patients who require special attention in policy development and evaluation. Critical research is needed to examine clinical outcomes in PwD further to inform practice and improve care quality.

Medicare Advantage Is Associated With Higher Mortality After Antibiotic Spacer Placement for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundPrivatized Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are an alternative to traditional Medicare (TM). We sought to identify differences in 90-day postoperative mortality and nonfatal adverse events between TM and MA patients undergoing stage 1 antibiotic spacer placement for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip or knee. MethodsA nationally representative database was queried from 2015 to 2021 for adult patients undergoing stage 1 antibiotic spacer placement for PJI. Using the International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes, as well as hospital charges for antibiotics, patients undergoing stage 1 exchange arthroplasty for PJI were identified. Patients were then grouped into TM and MA cohorts. The primary outcome was the odds of 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to address possible confounding demographic, comorbidity, and hospital characteristics. ResultsOf the 40,346 patients undergoing stage 1 spacer placement for PJI, 16,637 (41.2%) had TM coverage and 9,218 (22.8%) had MA coverage. Mortality within 90 days of surgery was higher in the MA cohort (1.4% versus 1.0%, P = 0.004). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated significantly higher adjusted odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42, 95% confidence interval = 1.11 to 1.81, P = 0.005) in MA patients compared to TM. ConclusionsEven after accounting for available confounders with our multivariable analyses, patients enrolled in an MA plan were more than 40% more likely to die within 90 days of surgery compared to patients who have TM coverage. Further study is necessary to better understand the underlying cause of this finding.

Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity Following a Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement

The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, a traditional Medicare bundled payment program for lower-extremity joint replacement, is associated with care for patients outside traditional Medicare. Whether CJR model outcomes have differed by patient race or ethnicity outside of traditional Medicare is unclear. To evaluate outcomes associated with the CJR model among Hispanic patients not enrolled in traditional Medicare. This cohort study used hospitalization data from California's Patient Discharge Dataset for all patients who underwent lower-extremity joint replacement in California between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. In California, 3 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were randomly selected to participate in CJR in April 2016. Hospitals not participating in other Medicare Alternative Payment Models were included in the treated group if they were in these 3 MSAs and in the control group if they were in the remaining 23 MSAs. The data analysis was performed between October 1 and December 31, 2023. Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement program implementation. The main outcomes were hospital length of stay and home discharge rates by race and ethnicity. Home discharge status included self-care, the use of home health services, and hospice care at home. Event study, difference-in-differences, and triple differences models were used to estimate differential changes in health care service use by race and ethnicity for patients in the treated MSAs compared with the control MSAs before vs after CJR implementation. Of 309 834 hospitalizations (patient mean [SD] age, 68.3 [11.3] years; 60.6% women; 14.8% Hispanic; 72.4% non-Hispanic White), 48.0% were in treated MSAs and 52.0% in control MSAs. The CJR program was associated with an increase in home discharge rates for patients without traditional Medicare coverage; however, the increase differed by patient race and ethnicity. The increase was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.08) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients with Medicare Advantage and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients without Medicare compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts. This cohort study shows that CJR program outcomes differed by race and ethnicity for patients covered outside traditional Medicare, with home discharge rates increasing more for Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic White patients. These findings suggest the importance of considering differential outcomes of Medicare payment policies for racial and ethnic minority patient populations beyond the initially targeted groups.

Medicare Advantage Enrollment Following the 21st Century Cures Act in Adults With End-Stage Renal Disease

In January 2021, under the 21st Century Cures Act, Medicare beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were permitted to enroll in private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans for the first time. In the first year of the Cures Act, there was a 51% increase in MA enrollment among beneficiaries with ESRD. To examine changes in MA enrollment among Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD in the first 2 years of the Cures Act and, among beneficiaries newly enrolled in MA in 2021, to assess the proportion of beneficiaries who switched MA contracts and how the characteristics of contracts changed. This cross-sectional, population-based time-trend study was conducted from January 2020 to December 2022. Eligible participants included Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD. Data analysis was conducted from August 2023 to March 2024. Enrollment in Medicare during the first 2 years of the 21st Century Cures Act. The primary outcomes were enrollment in MA, switching between traditional Medicare (TM) and MA, and switching between MA contracts from 2021 to 2022. There were 718 252 unique Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD between 2020 and 2022 (1 659 652 beneficiary-years). In 2022, there were 583 203 beneficiaries with ESRD (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [14.1] years, 245 153 female (42.0%); 197 988 Black [34.0%]; 47 912 Hispanic [8.2%]). The proportion of beneficiaries with ESRD who were enrolled in MA increased from 25.1% (118 601 of 472 234 beneficiaries) in January 2020 to 43.1% (211 896 of 491 611 beneficiaries) in December 2022. Increases in MA enrollment were larger in the first year of the Cures Act (12.6 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI 12.3-12.8 pp) compared with the second year (5.7 pp; 95% CI, 5.5-5.9 pp). Changes between December 2020 and December 2022 ranged between 49.3% for Asian or Pacific Islander beneficiaries (difference = 13.0 pp; 95% CI, 12.2-13.8 pp) and 207.2% for American Indian or Alaska Native beneficiaries (difference = 17.0 pp; 95% CI, 15.3-18.7 pp). Changes were high among partial dual-eligible (difference = 35.5 pp; 95% CI, 34.9-36.1 pp; 134.7% increase) and fully dual-eligible beneficiaries (difference = 22.8 pp, 95% CI, 22.5-23.1 pp; 98.0% increase). Among 53 366 beneficiaries enrolled in MA in 2021, 37 439 (70.2%) remained in their contract, 11 730 (22.0%) switched contracts, and 4197 (7.9%) switched to TM in 2022. Compared with the characteristics of MA enrollees with ESRD in 2021, those in 2022 were more likely to be in contracts with lower premiums and with a rating of 4.5 stars or higher. In this cross-sectional time-trend study of Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD, MA enrollment continued to increase in the second year of the Cures Act, particularly among racially or ethnically minoritized individuals and dual eligible populations. These findings suggest need to monitor the equity of care for beneficiaries with ESRD as they enroll in managed care plans.

Medical visits and mortality among dementia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to rates predicted from 2019

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) were especially vulnerable, and modes of medical care delivery shifted rapidly. This study assessed the impact of the pandemic on care for people with ADRD, examining the use of primary, emergency, and long-term care, as well as deaths due to COVID and to other causes.MethodsAmong 4.2 million beneficiaries aged 66 and older with ADRD in traditional Medicare, monthly deaths and claims for routine care (doctors’ office and telehealth visits), inpatient/emergency department (ED) visits, and long-term care facility use from March or June 2020 through December 2022 are compared to monthly rates predicted from January–December 2019 using OLS and logistic/negative binomial regression. Correlation analyses examine the association between excess deaths — due to COVID and non-COVID causes — and changes in care use in the beneficiary’s state of residence.ResultsIncreased telehealth visits more than offset reduced office visits, with primary care visits increasing overall (by 9 percent from June 2020 onward relative to the predicted rate from 2019, p < .001). Emergency/inpatient visits declined (by 9 percent, p < .001) and long-term care facility use declined, remaining 14% below the 2019 trend from June 2020 onward (p < .001). Both COVID and non-COVID deaths rose, with 231,000 excess deaths (16% above the prediction from 2019), over 80 percent of which were attributable to COVID. Excess deaths were higher among women, non-White patients, those in rural and isolated zip codes, and those with higher social deprivation index scores. States with the largest increases in primary care visits had the lowest excess deaths (correlation -0.49).ConclusionsOlder adults with ADRD had substantial deaths above pre-pandemic projections during the COVID-19 pandemic, 80 percent of which were attributed to COVID-19. Routine care increased overall due to a dramatic increase in telehealth visits, but this was uneven across states, and mortality rates were significantly lower in states with higher than pre-pandemic visits.

Disparities in time to treatment with oral antimyeloma medications

This retrospective cohort study used Taussig Cancer Center’s Myeloma Patient Registry to identify adults with multiple myeloma diagnosed between January 2017-December 2021. Electronic health records data captured time from diagnosis to initial prescription fill for oral antimyeloma medications and initiation of facility administered or oral antimyeloma treatment. We identified 720 patients with a mean age at diagnosis of 67 years ±11; 55% were male, 77% White, 22% Black, 1% other races, covered by private insurance (36%), traditional Medicare (29%), Medicare Advantage (25%), and Medicaid (8.3%). Over a third of patients (37%) resided in an area in the most disadvantaged area deprivation index (ADI) quartile. The median available follow-up was 765 days. Seventy-five percent of the cohort filled an oral antimyeloma medication prescription (excluding corticosteroids), with a median time to fill of 28 days (IQR, 15–61). In the multivariable Cox regression model, Black race (vs. White, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.61, 95% CI, 0.42–0.87), older age at diagnosis (aHR per 1 year, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.95–0.98), diagnosis during an inpatient admission (aHR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.43–0.92), and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤29 ml/min/1.73 m2 (vs. ≥60, aHR, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.29–0.73) were negatively associated with prescription fill for oral antimyeloma medication at 30 days, while insurance type and ADI were not significant predictors.