Traditional Growing Rods Research Articles

Surgical Strategy to Correct Coronal Decompensation in an Autofused Growing Rod “Graduate”: A Case Report

Abstract Management of patients implanted with growing rods who reach skeletal maturity (growing rod “graduates”) often poses challenging situation for spine surgeons. A 14-year-old female was implanted with traditional growing rods (TGR) – and presented to us with a coronally decompensated deformity. Imaging investigations revealed lumbosacral take-off due to a hemivertebra at the lumbosacral junction distal to the construct and “adding on” of the curve proximal to the construct. Autofusion of the spine was noted intraoperatively – correction was achieved whilst retaining the TGR, and using separate proximal and distal extensions of the construct to correct the deformity, connecting these to the previously implanted TGR. Improvement was noted in lumbosacral take-off angle, coronal shift, and T1 tilt, with no implant-related complications at final follow-up. The case describes a rational thought process and surgical strategy to deal with a challenging presentation of a patient with implanted TGR reaching skeletal maturity.

Safety of Traditional Growing Rods in Patients with Early-Onset Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Type-I Split Cord Malformation.

Literature regarding the application of traditional growing rod (TGR) instrumentation in patients with early-onset congenital scoliosis with type-I split cord malformation is scarce. The purpose of the present study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of TGR surgery and repeated lengthening procedures in patients with congenital scoliosis with type-I split cord malformation not treated with prophylactic osseous spur excision. Thirteen patients with early-onset congenital scoliosis associated with type-I split cord malformation and a stable neurologic status between March 2009 and July 2020 were recruited. All patients underwent primary TGR surgery and subsequent repeated lengthening procedures without osseous spur excision by the same surgical team. Clinical information and radiographic data from the preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up periods were collected. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the major coronal curve was 74.62° ± 25.59°, the mean early postoperative angle was 40.23° ± 17.89°, and the mean latest follow-up angle was 40.62° ± 16.60°. The scoliotic deformity correction percentage was 46.81% ± 12.26% after the initial operation and 45.08% ± 15.53% at the latest follow-up. Compared with the preoperative values, significant improvements were observed in the coronal and sagittal balance early postoperatively and at the latest follow-up (p < 0.05 for all). The average annual amounts of spinal height gained were 15.73 ± 5.95 mm at T1-S1, 8.94 ± 3.94 mm at T1-T12, and 12.02 ± 6.70 mm between the instrumented segments. The total height gained at T1-S1 and T1-T12 was 72.18 ± 28.74 mm and 37.62 ± 12.53 mm, respectively. No intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring events were observed, and no case of neurological deficit was observed postoperatively or during follow-up. Patients without neurologic deficit and having a stable neurologic exam who have early-onset congenital scoliosis associated with type-I split cord malformation can safely and effectively undergo TGR surgery, followed by repeated lengthening procedures, without prophylactic osseous spur excision. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Spinal height for growth guidance treatment in early onset idiopathic scoliosis: analysis through final surgical treatment.

The growth guidance (GG) method for treatment of early onset scoliosis has as its primary goal the restoration of apical spinal alignment, facilitating normal spinal growth to achieve a suitable adult thoracic height. To evaluate whether GG surgical treatment achieves comparable thoracic and spinal height to distraction-based treatment (DBT) in idiopathic early onset scoliosis (I-EOS) patients. We hypothesized that GG would prove superior to DBT at the time of definitive fusion surgery. All I-EOS patients who underwent GG at a single center were reviewed. T1-L1 and T1-S1 heights were measured using the traditional coronal method as well as the Halifax sagittal spinal length (SSL) technique. The same measurements were obtained from a comparable control group obtained from a multi-center pediatric early onset scoliosis database who underwent treatment with traditional growing rods (TGR) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). Of the I-EOS patients who underwent GG 2004-2019, 15 patients underwent final fusion after GG completion, with a mean 5.5years of GG treatment prior to fusion (range 2.0-11.4years). Mean age at GG implantation was 8.4years (range 2.0-11.7years); 7 were male and 8 female. GG patients experienced a mean coronal thoracic height increase of 6.2cm during treatment through final fusion, and a mean coronal spinal height increase of 8.8cm. At the time of final fusion, GG patients achieved greater significant mean increases than DBT patients by 2.9cm in coronal thoracic height (p = 0.0023), 4.5cm in coronal spinal height (p = 0.001), and 4.0cm in SSL spinal height (p = 0.01). No GG patient concluded treatment with a thoracic height less than 18cm in either coronal or sagittal plane. Not only did 100% of GG patients reach minimum thoracic height of 18cm at time of final fusion, but GG also proved to be superior to distraction-based constructs in a comparison cohort on 3 of 4 spinal elongation measures. 3.

Autofusion in early-onset scoliosis growing constructs: occurrence, risk factors, and impacts.

Autofusion (AF) during growing rod (GR) instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has been reported, but AF incidence, causation, and clinical implications remain unknown. This article aims to (1) quantify frequency and severity of AF, (2) determine risk factors for AF, and (3) assess the influence of AF on final curve correction and spinal lengthening. EOS patients were prospectively enrolled (2016-2021). Patients underwent evaluation, GR implantation, lengthenings, and posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Cobb angle and spinal length measurements were collected. AF was assessed and graded, with grades I-II being low-grade and III-V being high-grade. Exposure analysis quantified risk factors' impact via odds ratios and Pearson regression correlates. Statistical significance was p ≤ 0.05 or ≥ 0.95. 28 patients, with variable EOS diagnoses, were included. On average, GR were implanted at 8.54-year-old and lengthened over 4.66years. 53.6% of patients received magnetically controlled GR (MCGR) and 46.4% traditional GR (TGR). The average construct bridged 13.4 levels. Over the lengthening period, for all indications, patients averaged 2.9 total open procedures. Curves corrected from 68.5º preoperatively to 35.3º after index GR to 35.6º after PSF. Spinal length increased from 30.0cm preoperatively to 33.9cm after index GR to 39.5cm after PSF. AF grading was: 28.6% Grade I, 25.0% Grade II, 17.9% Grade III, 25.0% Grade IV, and 3.6% Grade V. Idiopathic EOS tended to have lower AF grades (p = 0.37). AF risk factors included GR age < 8 (10.4×, p = 0.01), any interval open procedures (6.3×, p = 0.05), and residual curve > 30º after index GR (13.7×, p = 0.02). Protective factors included preoperative spinal length of > 30.0cm (0.11×,p = 0.01) and index MCGR (0.16×, p = 0.03). Maintenance of Cobb angles from index GR through PSF was relatively better in low-grade patients (p = 0.08). Spinal length gained was no different between low- and high-grade AF (p = 0.50). This largest-to-date evaluation found AF is nearly ubiquitous in GR constructs, but with variable severity. Both risk factors and protective factors coincide with AF. Ultimately, even in high-grade AF, curve correction was maintained, and spinal lengthening was achieved. Level II-prospective cohort study.

Safety and effectiveness of halo gravity traction combined with traditional growing rods in severe early-onset scoliosis with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) scoliosis can be difficult to treat without early detection. Correcting deformities while considering long-term growth in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment is important. This study was performed to establish the safety and effectiveness of halo gravity traction (HGT) with traditional growing rods (TGRs) in NF-1 EOS. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 15 children (7 boys and 8 girls; mean age, 5.61 years) diagnosed with NF-1 EOS from October 2016 to March 2021. All patients underwent HGT before growing rod implantation. The growing rods were lengthened every 9-12 months, with a follow-up of 2-7 years. Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), trunk shift (TS), sagittal vertebral axis and T1-S1 height were measured before operation, after traction, after operation and at last follow-up. Complications were also recorded. Fifteen patients with NF-1 EOS were treated with an average traction weight of 10.00 kg. After 29.20 days of HGT, the Cobb angle improved from 99.10° to 62.60°, TK from 79.33° to 55.04°, TS from 31.05 to 17.71 mm, sagittal vertebral axis from 42.07 to 25.63 mm and T1-S1 height from 27.50 to 29.70 cm (P < 0.05 for all). Postoperatively, compared with post-traction, the Cobb angle was 52.40° (P = 0.002) and TK was 44.54° (P = 0.004). No complications occurred during traction. Growing rod dislocation occurred in one patient and growing rod breakage in one patient. HGT combined with TGRs was well-tolerated and effective for treating severe NF-1 EOS. It significantly corrected the Cobb angle and TK, restored trunk balance, and increased spinal height with few complications.

Instrumentation failure following pediatric spine deformity growth-sparing surgery using traditional growing rods or vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs

BackgroundInstrumentation failure (IF) is a major complication associated with growth-sparing surgery for pediatric spinal deformities; however, studies focusing on IF following each surgical procedure are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, timing, and rates of unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) associated with IF following each surgical procedure in growth-sparing surgeries using traditional growing rods (TGRs) and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs).MethodsWe reviewed 1,139 surgical procedures documented in a Japanese multicenter database from 2015 to 2017. Of these, 544 TGR and 455 VEPTR procedures were included for evaluation on a per-surgery basis. IF was defined as the occurrence of an implant-related complication requiring revision surgery.ResultsThe surgery-based incidences of IF requiring revision surgery in the TGR and VEPTR groups were 4.3% and 4.0%, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference. Remarkably, there was a negative correlation between IF incidence per surgical procedure and the number of lengthening surgeries in both groups. In addition, rod breakage in the TGR group and anchor-related complications in the VEPTR group tended to occur relatively early in the treatment course. The surgery-based rates of UPROR due to IF in the TGR and VEPTR groups were 2.0% and 1.5%, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference.ConclusionsWe found that IF, such as anchor related-complications and rod breakage, occurs more frequently earlier in the course of lengthening surgeries. This finding may help in patient counseling and highlights the importance of close postoperative follow-up to detect IF and improve outcomes.

Serum Titanium Levels Remain Elevated But Urine Titanium is Undetectable in Children With Early Onset Scoliosis Undergoing Growth-Friendly Surgical Treatment: A Prospective Study

Background: Elevated serum titanium levels have been found in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with traditional growing rods (TGR), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR). No studies have investigated whether serum titanium remains persistently elevated and if titanium is excreted. Our purpose was to compare serum titanium levels in patients with EOS with growth-friendly instrumentation to age-matched controls and evaluate urine titanium and serial serum titanium levels in patients with EOS. Methods: This was a prospective case-control study. Patients with EOS with TGR, MCGR, or VEPTR underwent urine titanium and serial serum titanium collection at a minimum 6-month interval. Control patients did not have a history of metal implant insertion and underwent serum titanium collection before fracture fixation. Results: Twenty patients with EOS (6 TGR, 8 MCGR, and 6 VEPTR) and 12 controls were analyzed. The control group had no detectable serum titanium (0 ng/mL), whereas the patients with EOS had a median serum titanium of 4.0 ng/mL (P &lt; 0.001). Analysis of variance showed significantly higher median serum titanium levels in the MCGR and VEPTR groups than the TGR group at time point 1 (5.5 vs 6.0 vs 2.0 ng/mL, P = 0.01) and time point 2 (6.5 vs 7.5 vs 2.0 ng/mL, P &lt; 0.001). Binary comparisons showed a significant difference in serum titanium level between TGR and MCGR (time point 1: P = 0.026, time point 2: P = 0.011) and TGR and VEPTR (time point 1: P = 0.035, time point 2: P = 0.003). However, there was no difference between MCGR and VEPTR (time point 1: P = 0.399, time point 2: P = 0.492) even though the VEPTR group had a longer duration of follow-up (P = 0.001) and a greater number of lengthenings per patient at the first serum collection (P = 0.016). No patients with EOS had detectable urine titanium. Conclusions: Patients with EOS treated with titanium alloy growth-friendly instrumentation had elevated serum titanium levels compared with age-matched controls that persisted over time with no evidence of renal excretion. Additional studies are necessary to assess for local and systemic accumulation of titanium and the significance of long-term exposure to titanium in growing children. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic.

Orthopedic mechanism analysis of growing rod distraction for early-onset scoliosis based on 3D morphological parameters.

Traditional growing rod (TGR) provides a corrective moment for deformed segments to straighten the spine, whose clinical efficacy has proven positive and growth-friendly. However, an insufficient understanding of orthopedic mechanisms can affect the development of clinical strategies. This research attempts to analyze the spine that has undergone four distraction operations: exploring the spinal orthopedic mechanism, including alignment, growth, and morphology. In this study, the spinal morphology curves were illustrated in three human planes to exhibit the changes in spinal alignment. The spinal growth characteristics were measured to discuss the unsynchronized and diminishing growth rate. The spinal deformations were evaluated to indicate asymmetric growth. As a result, the spinal alignment changes indicated the orthopedic process improved, but the re-unbalance occurred after multiple distractions. Then, unsynchronized growth existed in the superior and inferior segments, and the growth rate over every distraction diminished. Finally, asymmetric growth was indicated as the axial/circumferential growth ratio getting greater and the cuneate level approaching normal. Accordingly, a TGR is growth-friendly, but combining the osteotomy fusion of lumbar segments for severe early-onset scoliosis may be an excellent choice to solve the insufficient corrective stimulation. Regarding the distraction process, reshaping before the final fusion can fix the balance loss, and a prolonged distraction frequency fits the law of diminishing return. In conclusion, studying orthopedic mechanisms based on morphological measurement can guide clinical strategy optimization.

Growth-preserving instrumentation for early onset scoliosis

Early onset scoliosis is defined as aspinal deformity originating in the first 10years of life. Growth-preserving spinal instrumentation has therefore been designed to preserve growth of spine and chest wall and lungs to avoid serious pulmonary complications after early spine fusion. Indications, surgical technique and results of the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) technique, traditional growing rods (TGR), and magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) will be described. Indications for VEPTR are so-called mixed congenital deformities (type3) associated with vertebral malformations in association with chest wall deformities, especially fused ribs. There are also indications for neuromuscular or syndromic early onset scoliosis with bilateral rib-to-ilium constructs. However, most of those deformities are currently treated with either GR or MCGR in most centers. GR and MCGR are currently the treatment of choice for the majority of early onset scoliosis. There is no indication for growth-preserving strategies if the patients are mature or there is only little growth remaining. In these cases, final fusion should be performed. While the VEPTR technique involves an extensive approach with muscular dissections to the thoracic cage including rib osteotomies and thoracotomies, treatment with TGR or MCGR is minimally invasive, only exposing proximal and distal anchor points, leaving most of the spine including the apex undisturbed. Early mobilization is usually possible after 24-48 h. Braces may have to be prescribed for patients with osteopenia, noncompliance, or arisk to fall. Since 2005, more than 200patients were treated with the VEPTR technique, more than 200 patients with the MCGR technique, and about 30patients with the TGR technique in our department. Complication rates are high with all techniques including the law of diminishing returns, autofusion, bone anchor-related complications like loosening or migration of implants, failure to distract and proximal junctional kyphosis. In our own series of 13patients below age 3years, VEPTR proved to be effective for mixed deformities. In other studies, we were able to show that physiological growth with MCGR can be maintained for 2-3years but spinal growth declines after that period with acceptable complications. Complication rates in most studies are lower with MCGR compared to TGR and VEPTR. Therefore, it is currently the treatment of choice for most early onset scoliosis patients.

Growing rods in Early Onset Scoliosis: The current scenario

Background and aimsThe treatment of early onset scoliosis is a challenge. Some curves resolve spontaneously, while the more aggressive ones require surgical intervention. Several surgical strategies have been explored in this unique group of patients, though the distraction based growing rods are the mainstay of treatment. The aim of this paper is to consider the current scenario with the surgical treatment for early onset scoliosis with growing rods. MethodsThis is a narrative review that explores the various types of growing rod options that are currently available. The results, as reported in literature, are discussed. The complications and problems with the commonly used growing rods are explored, based on the reported literature and on retrieval analysis that we have published. We discuss some of the newer modifications of growing rods. ResultsThere is no real consensus on the ideal timing for the surgery or ways to assess the outcomes of the treatment. The Cobb angle measurement and measures of thoracic growth are surrogate markers. The main indication for surgery is to an increase in the thoracic dimensions and allowing for lung growth. Measures that are linked to lung function are more useful. We report some newer MRI scanning technology. Distraction-based growing rods have been reported to produce consistent and good results. Frequent return to theatre with the Traditional Growing Rods (TGR) and the metallosis related problems with the MCGR are reported. ConclusionsWe have learned a lot from the TGR and MCGR experiences. There is a scope for ongoing research to improve the design of the implant systems and better assess the outcomes on lung function. This review outlines these and helps identify the future trends.

The effectiveness of growth-friendly systems in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a systematic review

Objective. To perform a systematic analysis of the literature evaluating the effectiveness of growth-friendly systems in the treatment of early onset scoliosis.Material and Methods. A subject search was conducted in the Google Scholar database for the terms “growing rods”, “early onset scoliosis”, “treatment”, “surgery” and “growth-friendly” using AND or OR logical operators with a search depth of 10 years. At the first stage, 824 abstracts of publications were selected. The second stage of search was carried out in accordance with the PICOS criteria, 38 abstracts of original studies, case series and reviews of surgical techniques for spinal deformity correction with preservation of growth potential were selected. The evaluation criteria were divided into four groups: general data, correction of the frontal and sagittal components of the deformity, complications and unplanned scenarios.Results. In the analyzed studies, gender equality of distribution was observed, and the average age at the time of the primary operation was 6.6 years for patients with traditional growing rods (TGR) and Schilla/Luque trolley and 4.9 years for patients with Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR). From the point of view of the magnitude of spinal deformity correction, the VEPTR systems demonstrated the minimum result (18 % correction), and the TGR and Schilla results were comparable (42.1 and 53.1 %, respectively), as well as the indicators of the dynamics of body lengthening.Conclusion. The use of VEPTR systems is associated with a high risk of complications and a somewhat lower efficiency of spinal deformity correction, however, VEPTR is indispensable in the treatment of thoracic insufficiency syndrome, as well as severe deformities of the axial skeleton in young children using non-vertebral fixation points. Growth modulation systems (Schilla and Luque trolley) showed deformity correction results similar to those of TGR.

Maintenance of curve correction and unplanned return to the operating room with magnetically controlled growing rods: a cohort of 24 patients with follow-up between 2 and 7 years.

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as spinal curvature affecting children below 10years of age. Non-operative treatment can consist of casting and bracing. When curvature progresses despite these treatments, operative intervention is indicated. Traditional growing rods (TGR) have been a mainstay of treatment. Unfortunately, TGR's require planned return to the operating room every 6-9months. Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGR) ideally provide curve correction and allow the spine to grow without frequent surgeries. However, the ability to correct and maintain correction after MCGR has not been well-characterized. The purpose of this study is to evaluate maintenance of curve correction in patients treated primarily with MCGR and analyze the rate of complications including unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR). 24 patients with EOS were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were subdivided into 4 subcategories: congenital, idiopathic, neuromuscular (NMS), and syndromic. The major curve correction (%) and T1-S1 distance were assessed utilizing scoliosis plain film radiographs over time. Complications and return to the operating room for any reason were recorded. Patients were followed until conversion to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent lengthening of MCGR. There were 11 male and 13 female patients averaging 8 years at the time of index surgery. The average preoperative curve angle was 61.1°. Initial curve correction with MCGR obtained at the index procedure was 46.2%, reducing the mean curve angle to 32.7° (p < 0.05). Curve correction at a mean 6.2years (2.4-7.4) follow-up was 36.1°, 40.9% curve correction. 75% of patients underwent conversion to PSF during the study period 4.8years (2.4-7.0) after initial MCGR surgery. 15% of patients were still undergoing MCGR lengthening after 6.1years. 54.2% of patients had at least one UPROR. For patients with EOS with curve progression, MCGRs can maintain curve correction well after 2years. Furthermore, MCGR allowed patients to grow over time to safely delay timing to definitive fusion. On average, patients underwent conversion to PSF after 4.7years at an average age of 13.5. Although the complication rate in the first 2years is relatively low, 54.2% of patients underwent an UPROR. As the use of MCGR increases, surgeons should be aware of possible complications associated with this technology and counsel patients accordingly. Further research is needed to continue to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MCGR in this challenging patient population.

Surgical treatment of neuromuscular Early Onset Scoliosis with a bilateral posterior one-way rod compared to the Spring Distraction System: study protocol for a limited-efficacy Randomized Controlled Trial (BiPOWR)

BackgroundEarly Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is a progressive spinal deformity in children, and a potentially life-threatening disease. “Growth-friendly” surgical techniques aim to control the deformity, while allowing the spine and trunk to maintain growth. Current “growth-friendly” systems such as the traditional growing rod (TGR) and magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) have limitations that reduce their efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Recently, two “growth-friendly” systems have been developed that mitigate many of these limitations, the Spring Distraction System (SDS) and the One Way Self-Expanding Rod (OWSER). The purpose of the multicenter BiPOWR trial is to investigate, describe and compare the 1-year limited-efficacy and -safety of both strategies in the treatment of neuromuscular EOS.MethodsAfter informed consent, 28 neuromuscular EOS patients will be randomized to receive either the SDS or the OWSER. Patients and caregivers will be blinded to allocation until after surgery. Primary outcomes will be maintenance of coronal curve correction and the occurrence of serious adverse events. In addition, spinal growth, implant lengthening, and perioperative findings are recorded systematically. At each follow-up moment, the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. All outcomes will be compared between groups.DiscussionThe BiPOWR trial is the first randomized controlled trial that compares two specific “growth-friendly” implants in a specified EOS population. It will determine the 1-year limited-efficacy and safety of the SDS and OWSER implants.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT04021784 (13–06-2019). CCMO registry: NL64018.041.17 (06–05-2019).

Outcomes and Safety of Traditional Growing Rod Technique in the Treatment of Early-onset Dystrophic Scoliosis Secondary to Type 1 Neurofibromatosis With Intraspinal Rib Head Dislocation in Children.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes and safety of traditional growing rod (TGR) in the treatment of early-onset dystrophic scoliosis secondary to type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1-EOS) with intraspinal rib head dislocation (IRH) in children. From September 2006 to June 2020, 21 patients with NF1-EOS were treated with TGR. The patients comprised 13 boys and 8 girls with a mean age of 7.1±1.5 years. Two patients had IRH-induced nerve injury [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade D]. No neurological symptoms were found in the other patients. The intraspinal rib proportion, apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral translation, coronal main thoracic curve, trunk shift, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal balance, and T1-S1 height were measured before and after TGR implantation and at the last follow-up. Complications were also evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 3.4±2.0 years. An average of 3.1 times (range: 1 to 8 times) lengthening procedures were performed in each patient. The intraspinal rib proportion was significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (22±11% vs. 33±18%, respectively; P <0.001), and no significant correction loss was found at the last follow-up (24±12%, P= 0.364). Compared with the measurements before TGR implantation, the major coronal curve and T1-S1 height after TGR implantation and at the last follow-up were significantly different ( P <0.05). Significant correction of apical vertebral translation, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance were noted after TGR implantation, and no significant correction loss was found at the last follow-up ( P >0.05). Ten complications occurred in 7 patients. Two patients with nerve injury recovered after the operation. No neurological complications were found during the follow-up. TGR is a safe and effective therapy for NF1-EOS with IRH where there was no direct compression of the spinal cord, which was confirmed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Through this procedure, IRH could be partly removed from the spinal canal. Level III.

A Comprehensive Assessment of Psychosocial Well-being Among Growing Rod Graduates: A Preliminary Investigation.

Traditional growing rods (TGR) encompass a long process, in which patients experience physical and psychosocial difficulties. However, the effect of repeating surgeries on the overall psychological functioning of graduated patients has not been thoroughly investigated in the literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychological well-being of graduated idiopathic early-onset scoliosis patients in terms of psychopathology, neurocognition, and psychosocial functioning, and determine the accuracy of scoliosis outcome questionnaires in these regards. TGR graduates with idiopathic early-onset scoliosis without known intellectual disabilities or neuromuscular impairments were included. Patients were thoroughly evaluated using psychological instruments [Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Auditory Consonant Trigram Test, Verbal Fluency Test, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Symptom Checklist-90, Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Spinal Appearance Questionnaire, Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22)]. Results were compared with normative data when available. Spearman correlations were performed between the results of these tests, the total treatment duration, and the number of spinal surgeries. Of the 15 patients included in the study, 9 were females, and the mean age was 18.73 (16 to 23). The mean age at index surgery was 6.38 (3 to 10) whereas that of graduation was 14.00 (12 to 16). The average number of spinal surgeries was 14.28 (7 to 20). Two patients performed below the range of adult intellectual functioning. Auditory Consonant Trigram Test showed normal verbal working memory and attention control. Six patients had abnormal Verbal Fluency Test performance. Eight patients had abnormal ratings on at least one of the assessment scales of psychopathology (Symptom Checklist-90, Beck Depression Inventory, and Beck Anxiety Inventory). Eight patients had low-to-moderate self-esteem (Rosenberg self-esteem scale). The median spinal appearance questionnaire and SRS-22 scores were 34 and 4.18, respectively. Pain and function subdomains of SRS-22 scored higher than self-image and mental health. No correlation was found between the treatment duration and number of surgeries and test scores. SRS-22 showed correlations with multiple psychological tests. Completed TGR treatment yields acceptable correction of deformities and surgical outcomes, however, may fail to improve psychological well-being. This is the first study to find various psychosocial abnormalities in two-thirds of cases. Level IV; cross-sectional study.

Growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in Ehlers-Danlos disease.

To study the results and complications of Traditional Growing Rods (TGR) for the treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). This is a retrospective study of patients with EDS treated for EOS between 2012 and 2018 by TGR. For each patient, we evaluated the evolution of the Cobb angle of the main coronal curve before the first surgery, postoperatively and at the last follow-up. We also noted every complication. Four patients have been evaluated. Age at the index surgery ranged from 3- to 6-year-old. All the patients had a Kyphoscoliosis. The preoperative Cobb angle of the main coronal curve ranged from 70° to 104°. Prior to surgery, a progressive correction of the spinal deformity by Halo-gravity traction was performed for all patients. One patient had several complications with a poor result after final fusion. Three patients did not sustain any complication and presented good results. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 8years. For two of our patients, further lengthening procedures are still needed. TGR is a good surgical option for the treatment of EOS in EDS. A progressive preoperative correction is recommended. Anchor-related complications must be minimized in these patients with an important kyphosis. Level of evidence Level IV.

Comparison of surgical interventions for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Several growth-preserving surgical techniques are employed in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The authors' objective was to compare the use of traditional growing rods (TGRs), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), Shilla growth guidance techniques, and vertically expanding prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs) for the management of EOS. A systematic review of electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane, was performed. Outcomes of interest included correction of Cobb angle, T1-S1 distance, and complication rate, including alignment, hardware failure and infection, and planned and unplanned reoperation rates. The percent changes and 95% CIs were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 67 studies were identified, which included 2021 patients. Of these, 1169 (57.8%) patients underwent operations with TGR, 178 (8.8%) Shilla growth guidance system, 448 (22.2%) MCGR, and 226 (11.1%) VEPTR system. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 6.9 ± 1.2 years. The authors found that the Shilla technique provided the most significant improvement in coronal Cobb angle immediately after surgery (mean [95% CI] 64.3% [61.4%-67.2%]), whereas VEPTR (27.6% [22.7%-33.6%]) performed significantly worse. VEPTR also performed significantly worse than the other techniques at final follow-up. The techniques also provided comparable gains in T1-S1 height immediately postoperatively (mean [95% CI] 10.7% [8.4%-13.0%]); however, TGR performed better at final follow-up (21.4% [18.7%-24.1%]). Complications were not significantly different among the patients who underwent the Shilla, TGR, MCGR, and VEPTR techniques, except for the rate of infections. The TGR technique had the lowest rate of unplanned reoperations (mean [95% CI] 15% [10%-23%] vs 24% [19%-29%]) but the highest number of planned reoperations per patient (5.31 [4.83-5.82]). The overall certainty was also low, with a high risk of bias across studies. This analysis suggested that the Shilla technique was associated with a greater early coronal Cobb angle correction, whereas use of VEPTR was associated with a lower correction rate at any time point. TGR offered the most significant height gain at final follow-up. The complication rates were comparable across all surgical techniques. The optimal surgical approach should be tailored to individual patients, taking into consideration the strengths and limitations of each option.

Longitudinal comparison of direct medical cost, radiological and health-related quality of life treatment outcomes between traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods from preoperative to maturity

BackgroundMagnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have replaced traditional growing rods (TGR) in the past decade, however, a comparison of their direct costs and treatment outcomes based on real longitudinal data is lacking. This study aims to compare the direct cost and treatment outcomes between TGR and MCGR, whilst incorporating complications, reoperations and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) throughout the entire treatment course.MethodsPatients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who underwent initial growing rod surgery between 2003 and 2016 at a tertiary scoliosis clinic were studied with longitudinal data. Accumulated direct medical costs were calculated based on the unit cost of surgeries of each TGR and MCGR, costs incurred for any rod exchange or remedial surgery for post-operative complication. Treatment outcomes were evaluated via: Patient’s HRQoL using SRS-22r questionnaire, and radiological parameters (including major curve correction, spine length gains, spinal balance) throughout the treatment until maturity.ResultsA total of 27 EOS patients (16 MCGR, 11 TGR) were studied. Total direct cost of index surgery for MCGR was HKD$223,108 versus lower cost of HKD$135,184 for TGR (p < 0.001). At 2–3 years post-index surgery, accumulative total direct medical cost of MCGR and TGR became most comparable (TGR:MCGR ratio = 1.010) and had reached neutrality between the two groups since. Radiological parameters had no intergroup differences at maturity. For HRQoL, TGR group had shown the trend of less pain (domain score mean difference: 0.53, p = 0.024) post-index surgery and better self-appearance (domain score mean difference: 1.08, p = 0.017) before fusion. Higher satisfaction with treatment (domain score mean difference: 0.76, p = 0.029) was demonstrated by TGR patients at fusion/maturity. MCGR had negative (rs = -0.693) versus TGR’s positive (rs = 0.989) correlations (p < 0.05) of cost and SRS-22r total scores at 2–3 years post-index surgery.ConclusionsFrom index surgery to maturity, TGR demonstrated better satisfaction with treatment by patients and comparable overall HRQoL with MCGR during the treatment course, as MCGR did not show apparent benefit despite less surgeries and cost neutrality between the two groups at 2–3 years post-index surgery.

Trends in the Utilization of Implants in Index Procedures for Early Onset Scoliosis From the Pediatric Spine Study Group.

Because of the relative rarity of Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) cases, patient registries were developed to combine clinical information from multiple institutions to maximize patient care and outcomes. This study examines the history and trends regarding the use of growth-friendly devices for index surgical procedures in EOS patients within the Pediatric Spine Study Group database. All index growth-friendly implants were queried from registry inception until October 2020. EOS etiology, device/implant type, and geographic area/institution for each procedure were recorded. From 1994 to 2020, 2786 patients underwent index surgery at a mean age of 6.2±2.9 years. There were 908 traditional growing rods (TGR) (32.3%), 922 vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib devices (VEPTR) (33.1%), 5 hybrid VEPTR/TGR (0.18%), and 951 magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) (34.2%) index implants. Fifty-six different institutions reported an index implant, and 5 accounted for 823 (30%) of the cases during the study period. Institutions in the Northeast accounted for more index implants than other regions of the United States. There was a 40% increase in index implant insertions annually when comparing 1994 (3 implants/1 center) to 2018 (234 implants/56 centers), ( P <0.001). Beginning in 2009, there was a 90.9% decrease in the number of TGR/VEPTR procedures (2009: 156 implants/32 centers; 2019: 22 implants/49 centers P =0.001), and a 479% increase in MCGR (2009: 1 implant/1 center; 2018: 197 implants/34 centers ( P =0.005). The overall number of growth-friendly index procedures performed in 2019 (150/49 centers) decreased 34.5% when compared to 2018 (234/48 centers). The number of growth-friendly implants reported in the Pediatric Spine Study Group registry as the initial surgical management of EOS increased markedly over the past 20 years. MCGR is currently the predominant type of device utilized for index surgical procedures by group members, surpassing the use of VEPTR and TGR in 2014. There was a significant decrease in index growth-friendly procedures in 2019 compared to 2018. Level IV.

Complications of single growing rod constructs in the treatment of severe early-onset scoliosis: a lesson relearned.

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is one of the most challenging areas of orthopedic management. Previous studies have reported that EOS patients were associated with high risk of complications following growth-friendly surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the complications of single traditional growing rods (TGRs) in the treatment of EOS. In a retrospective chart review study, medical records of all EOS patients treated with single TGRs between 2006 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients under the age of 10 at the time of surgery who had at least 24months of follow-up were included. Intra- and post-operative complications included both device-related and disease-related complications. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. A total of 35 patients with a mean age of 5.7 ± 2.1years with the mean follow-up duration of 33.3 ± 9.1months were included in the final analysis. Of the 35 participants, 27 children (77.1%) experienced at least one complication. A total of 61 complications were observed, giving rise to 1.7 complications per patient. An unplanned surgical procedure was needed to manage 42 of the 61 complications (68.8%). Thirty-five cases of implant failure, 11 cases of deep infection, and 2 cases of junctional kyphosis were identified. It seems that even in the setting that the use of dual TGRs is not possible, the use of single TGRs as the only therapeutic modality should be minimized due to high rate of complications even as a bridge treatment. Therapeutic level III.