This study evaluated the potential of using dogs’ apparent age, judged from photographs, as a non-invasive tool for assessing their welfare. Traditional welfare assessment methods often rely on behavioral and physiological indicators, which can be resource-intensive and invasive. This research explored whether apparent age, a measure used in humans to predict health and longevity, can also serve as an indicator of welfare in dogs by investigating its association with relative telomere length (RTL), a biomarker of biological aging. Photographs of 60 domestic dogs were evaluated by canine specialists and general volunteers via the citizen science platform Zooniverse. Participants estimated the age of 20 dogs from three different age categories: young (0–2 years), adult (2–5 years), and senior (6+ years). The accuracy of these predictions was compared to the dogs’ chronological ages and RTLs. Generalized linear models were used to assess factors influencing prediction accuracy, including the dogs’ age, sex, and origin. Results indicated that both specialists and volunteers reliably estimated the age of senior dogs, with no significant differences in accuracy between groups. Dogs with accurate apparent age estimates had RTLs matching their chronological age, while those with premature aging signs had shorter RTLs. This suggests apparent age could be a practical, non-invasive welfare assessment tool, offering a potentially accessible method for new welfare assessment protocols.
Read full abstract