Objective. Traditionally known for its involvement in emotional processing, the amygdala’s involvement in motor control remains relatively unexplored, with sparse investigations into the neural mechanisms governing amygdaloid motor movement and inhibition. This study aimed to characterize the amygdaloid beta-band (13–30 Hz) power between ‘Go’ and ‘No-go’ trials of an arm-reaching task. Approach. Ten participants with drug-resistant epilepsy implanted with stereoelectroencephalographic (SEEG) electrodes in the amygdala were enrolled in this study. SEEG data was recorded throughout discrete phases of a direct reach Go/No-go task, during which participants reached a touchscreen monitor or withheld movement based on a colored cue. Multitaper power analysis along with Wilcoxon signed-rank and Yates-corrected Z tests were used to assess significant modulations of beta power between the Response and fixation (baseline) phases in the ‘Go’ and ‘No-go’ conditions. Main results. In the ‘Go’ condition, nine out of the ten participants showed a significant decrease in relative beta-band power during the Response phase (p ⩽ 0.0499). In the ‘No-go’ condition, eight out of the ten participants presented a statistically significant increase in relative beta-band power during the response phase (p ⩽ 0.0494). Four out of the eight participants with electrodes in the contralateral hemisphere and seven out of the eight participants with electrodes in the ipsilateral hemisphere presented significant modulation in beta-band power in both the ‘Go’ and ‘No-go’ conditions. At the group level, no significant differences were found between the contralateral and ipsilateral sides or between genders. Significance. This study reports beta-band power modulation in the human amygdala during voluntary movement in the setting of motor execution and inhibition. This finding supplements prior research in various brain regions associating beta-band power with motor control. The distinct beta-power modulation observed between these response conditions suggests involvement of amygdaloid oscillations in differentiating between motor inhibition and execution.
Read full abstract