Total Consumption Of Sufentanil Research Articles

Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil in intravenous controlled analgesia after Salter osteotomy in children.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on postoperative analgesia in developmental hip dislocation in children after Salter osteotomy. The clinical data of 98 children with developmental hip dislocation, who underwent Salter osteotomy in our center between January 2020 and February 2023, were selected. The children were randomly divided into four groups based on the application of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (sufentanil + granisetron ± dexmedetomidine). All children received 1 µg/kg/day of sufentanil and 3 mg of granisetron. Group A did not receive dexmedetomidine, and Groups B, C, and D received 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine, respectively. The pain indicators and immune factor levels of children in each group were compared. The heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) 2 h after operation in Groups C and D were significantly lower than those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05). The pain scores decreased over time after treatment in all groups. When compared at the same time point, children in Group D had the lowest pain scores, which were significantly lower than the other three groups (P < 0.05). The total consumption of sufentanil in Groups C and D was significantly lower than that in Group A (P < 0.05). On the first day after surgery, the children in Group D had lower levels of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin-6, and corticosterone than those in Group A (P < 0.05). Administration of 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil in intravenous controlled analgesia after Salter osteotomy for developmental hip dislocation in children has a better analgesic effect, less consumption of sufentanil, and low incidence of opioid adverse reactions.

Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Nerve Block for Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Our understanding of dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery, is characterized by a current lack of compelling evidence, and it remains unknown whether the potential benefits of use outweigh the risks. The aim of the study was to evaluate the benefit and safety profiles of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Springer, medRxiv, and Scopus up to 17 May 2024. Risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes were quantified. Results: Twenty studies were identified. In breast cancer surgery, the use of dexmedetomidine reduced 24 h total morphine consumption (SMD = -1.99 [95% CI -3.01 to -0.98], p = 0.0001, I2 = 91%, random effects) and prolonged the requirement for morphine rescue analgesia (SMD = 2.98 [95% CI 0.01 to 5.95], p = 0.05, I2 = 98%, random effects). In abdominal cancer surgery, the dexmedetomidine group had lower total sufentanil consumption (SMD = -1.34 [95% CI -2.29 to -0.40], p = 0.005, I2 = 84%, random effects). Dexmedetomidine reduced the VAS score and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). No studies using dexmedetomidine reported serious adverse events. Conclusions: Using dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery could lower the VAS pain score and prolong the regional anesthesia duration, which would lead to a decrease in total opioid consumption and possibly contribute to fewer PONV events. Furthermore, the reports of no serious adverse events indicate its good safety profile.

Application of superior iliac fascia block of inguinal ligament combined with patient controlled intravenous analgesia in elderly patients after hip arthroplasty

To compare the effect of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) and superior inguinal ligament iliac fascia block combined with PCIA after hip replacement in the elderly. Total of 82 elderly patients were treated with hip arthroplasty from June 2019 to June 2021 and randomly divided into observation group and control group. There were 42 patients in control group, including 18 males and 24 females, aged from 60 to 78 years old with an average of (70.43±3.67) years old, 28 femoral neck fractures and 14 femoral head necrosis, who received PCIA. The study group consisted of 42 cases, including 20 males and 22 females, aged from 61 to 76 years old with an average of (69.68±3.74) years old, 25 femoral neck fractures and 17 femoral head necrosis, who received superior inguinal ligament iliac fascia block combined with PCIA. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramesay sedation scores at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation were evaluated. In addition, the follow-up results of the total consumption of sufentanil and the total number of PCIA compressions at 48 hours after operation, the first time of landing after surgery, the time of hospital stay, the incidence of adverse reactions, the satisfaction with analgesia of two groups were observed. All patients were followed up for 9 to 24 months with an average of(13.85±2.67) months. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative bleeding between two groups (P>0.05). There was no difference in VAS between two groups at 2 hours after operation (P>0.05), and the VAS of the study group at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05). The Ramesay sedation scores of the study group at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h after operation were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05), and there were no differences in Ramesay score between two groups at 24 h and 48 h after operation (P>0.05). The consumption of sufentanil in the study group within 48 hours after operation was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and PCIA compression times were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05), and the time of first landing was earlier than that in the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay, adverse reaction rate, complications between two groups (P>0.05). The satisfaction of analgesia in the study group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Superior iliac fascia block of inguinal ligament combined with PCIA has significant analgesic and sedative effects after hip arthroplasty in the elderly. It can reduce the amount of sufentanil used and the total number of PCIA compressions, which is conducive to the early activity of patients out of bed, improve the satisfaction of analgesia.

The influence of COMT and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms on sufentanil analgesic effect for postoperative pain in children with fracture.

The aim of this observational study was to investigate the effects of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and ATP-binding cassette transporter B1 (ABCB1) gene polymorphisms on the postoperative analgesic effect of sufentanil in Chinese Han pediatric patients with fractures. A total of 185 pediatric patients who underwent fracture surgery were included. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism was used to detect the polymorphisms of COMT and ABCB1 genes. Sufentanil was used for postoperative analgesia. The pain level of the patients was evaluated using the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale before surgery, during awakening, at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. The postoperative Ramsay sedation score, sufentanil consumption, and incidence of adverse reactions were also recorded. Pediatric patients with different genotypes of ABCB1 and COMT showed no statistically significant differences in general data such as age, gender, weight, height, surgical duration, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P > .05). There were no statistically significant differences in sedation scores after surgery between different genotypes of ABCB1 and COMT (P > .05). Among patients with CC genotype in ABCB1, the pain scores and total consumption of sufentanil at awakening, 2 and 6 hours after surgery were higher compared to TT and CT genotypes (P < .05), while there were no statistically significant differences between TT and CT genotypes (P > .05). Among patients with AA genotype in COMT, the pain scores and total consumption of sufentanil at awakening, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were higher compared to AG and GG genotypes (P < .05), while there were no statistically significant differences between AG and GG genotypes (P > .05). There were no statistically significant differences in adverse reactions between different genotypes of ABCB1 and COMT (P > .05). The polymorphisms of COMT gene rs4680 and ABCB1 gene rs1045642 are associated with the analgesic effect and consumption of sufentanil in pediatric patients after fracture surgery.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveKidney neoplasms have a high incidence, and radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy are the main treatment options. Our study aims to investigate the use of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy surgery. DesignProspective, randomized, double-blind. SettingUniversity hospital. PatientsOur study included 50 patients (ASA I-III) who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy at the hospital of Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University. InterventionsThe patients were divided into two groups: the ESPB group and the control group. In the ESPB group, a mixture of 10 mL of 1% lidocaine, 10 mL of 0.7% ropivacaine, 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, and 5 mg of dexamethasone was administered. In the control group, 20 mL of 0.9% saline was administered. MeasurementsThe primary outcome measure was the total consumption of sufentanil during the intraoperative period. Secondary outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during coughing at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively, intraoperative consumption of remifentanil, frequency of rescue analgesic administration, consumption of rescue analgesia and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 48 h. ResultsThe ESPB group exhibited lower intraoperative consumption of sufentanil, lower consumption of rescue analgesia, as well as VAS scores at rest and during coughing within the first 24 h postoperatively, compared to the control group. However, no significant differences were observed in VAS scores at 48 h postoperatively, postoperative nausea and vomiting, or the need for postoperative rescue analgesia. ConclusionsUltrasound-guided ESPB performed in patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy demonstrated a substantial decrease in intraoperative opioid consumption, as well as lower VAS scores at rest and during coughing in the postoperative period.

General anesthesia combined with bilateral 2-level erector spinae plane block may accelerate postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and rehabilitation process in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThis randomized controlled trial explored whether bilateral 2-level erector spinae plane block could accelerate postoperative gastrointestinal function and rehabilitation in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery. MethodsA total of 80 adult patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery between March 2021 and August 2021 were randomized to either ultrasound-guided bilateral 2-level erector spinae plane block (group E) or not (group C). General anesthesia was routinely performed. The primary outcome was the time of the first flatus after surgery. We also recorded the first food and liquid intake, first off-bed activity, days of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Postoperative visual analog scale score and opioid consumption were also recorded. A venous blood sample was taken to measure the serum concentration of lipopolysaccharides, c-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and blood glucose before induction of anesthesia, immediately after, and 24 and 48 hours after surgery. ResultsSeventy-seven patients, 39 in group C and 38 in group E, finished the trial. Patients in group E had a significantly shorter time to first flatus (16.2 ± 3.2 vs 19.7 ± 3.0 hours, P < .05), earlier liquid intake (1.7 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 0.3 hours, P < .05), earlier food intake (1.9 ± 0.2 vs 2.1 ± 0.3 hours, P < .05), and first off-bed activity (27.9 ± 3.2 vs 31.4 ± 3.3 h, P < .05). Patients in group E had shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.6 [4.2–5.5] d vs 5.4 [4.5–6.3], P < .05). We found that patients in group E had less pain and total sufentanil consumption (129 [120–133] vs 138 [132–147] μg, P < .05) within 24 hours after surgery. At 24 hours after surgery, the serum concentrations of lipopolysaccharides, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein in group E were significantly decreased compared to group C (P < .05). ConclusionBilateral 2-level erector spinae plane block can accelerate gastrointestinal function recovery and shorten the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing open posterior lumbar surgery. The potential mechanism may attribute to the opioids-sparing effects and anti-stress–related anti-inflammatory effects of bilateral 2-level erector spinae plane block.

Opioid-Sparing Effects of Flurbiprofen Axetil as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Pre-Emptive Scalp Infiltration for Post-Craniotomy Pain: Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pain after craniotomy remains a poorly controlled problem that is mainly caused by the inflammatory reaction at the incision site. Nowadays, systemic opioids use, as first-line analgesics, is often limited because of adverse effects. Flurbiprofen axetil (FA) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug merged into emulsified lipid microspheres, which represent a strong affinity to inflammatory lesions. Local administration of flurbiprofen into a surgical wound has induced enhanced analgesic efficacy and few systemic or local adverse effects after oral surgery. However, the impact of local FA, as a non-opioid pharmacologic alternative, remains elusive on postoperative pain in craniotomy. In this study, we presume that pre-emptive infiltration of scalp with FA as an adjuvant to ropivacaine can lead to less sufentanil consumption postoperatively in patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) compared with ropivacaine alone. We design a multicenter, randomized controlled study that will enroll 216 subjects who are planned to receive supratentorial craniotomy. Patients will receive pre-emptive infiltration of scalp either with 50 mg FA and 0.5% ropivacaine, or with 0.5% ropivacaine alone. Primary outcome is total consumption of sufentanil with PCIA device at 48 h postoperatively. This is the first study attempting to explore the analgesic and safety profile of local FA as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for incisional pain in patients undergoing craniotomy. It will provide additional insights into the opioid-sparing analgesia pathways by local administration of NSAIDs for neurosurgery.

Effect of Intravenous Injection of Remazolam on Stress Response and Analgesic Effect in Patients with Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Single-Centre Study.

The reasonable selection of anaesthesia methods and drugs is the key to ensuring the perioperative safety of patients with the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The effect of intravenous remazolam injection on stress response and analgesic effect in patients with transurethral prostate cancer electrotomy were explored. The medical records of 160 patients with prostatic hyperplasia who underwent TURP in Tianjin hospital from November 2020 to November 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. Five patients who did not meet the study conditions were excluded, and 155 patients were finally included. According to anaesthesia schemes, the patients were divided into the observation group (OBG, n = 76, routine surgical anaesthesia and intravenous remazolam injection) and control group (COG, n = 79, routine surgical anaesthesia). Postoperative eye-opening times were recorded for both groups. The groups were compared in terms of anaesthetic effects, stress indexes, haemodynamic indexes, and use of postoperative analgesic drugs at different times, and adverse reactions were observed. The anaesthesia onset time and eye-opening time in the OBG were shorter than those in the COG (p < 0.001). The heart rate and mean arterial pressure of the OBG during anaesthesia induction were higher than those in the COG (p < 0.001). The OBG showed significantly lower noradrenaline and cortisol levels than the COG 1, 12 and 24 h after surgery (p < 0.001). The time of first pressing in the analgesic pump in the OBG was later than that in the COG, and the total consumption of sufentanil was less than that in the COG (p < 0.001). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the OBG was lower than that in the COG (p < 0.05). Intravenous remazolam injection provides safe and effective sedation and analgesia for patients on TURP and reduces the occurrence of stress responses and adverse reactions. However, cases involved in this study were all from a single centre, and multi-centre research and verification are needed.

Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) with Sufentanil Background Infusion for Post-Cesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PurposeTo investigate the effectiveness of sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump (PCIA) and background infusion in patients of post-cesarean analgesia.Patients and MethodsThis trial compared two groups of women undergoing cesarean section and receiving PCIA: no background infusion group (n=30), 6-min lockout time, and background infusion group (n=30), 2 mL/h infusion, 10-min lockout time. Both groups with 2 μg/kg sufentanil was diluted to 100 mL with normal saline. VAS scores at rest at 36 h was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were the VAS scores at rest at 6, 12, and 24 h, the total amount of sufentanil consumed, the Ramsay sedation score (RSS) assessed at the same time points, postpartum bleeding within 24 h, the injection/attempt (I/A) ratio, BP and HR, PONV, side effects of sufentanil.ResultsCompared with the no background infusion group, the background infusion group showed lower VAS pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h (P<0.01), but no differences at 36 h (95% CI = −0.5–0.8. P>0.05). Attempts, injections, and total sufentanil consumption were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001), but without difference in I/A. Bleeding was less in the background infusion group at 1 h (P=0.03). The minimal respiration rates were not significantly different between groups.ConclusionBackground infusion increased the total consumption of sufentanil within 36 h after cesarean section. Although it did not reduce uterine contraction pain and wound pain at 36 h, it significantly reduced the pain at 6, 12, and 24 h after cesarean section. It improved patient satisfaction and reduced the amount of bleeding after 1 h. Importantly, it did not increase the incidence of hypertension, PONV and respiratory depression.

Dexmedetomidine vs. lidocaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy: a protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundPostoperative pain is a common problem that occurs in pediatric patients following neurosurgery which may lead to severe complications. Dexmedetomidine is a commonly used adjuvant medicine in craniotomy owing to its sedative, amnestic, analgesic, and neuroprotective properties. Besides, studies suggest that lidocaine has similar effects on sedation, analgesia, and neuroprotection. Both two adjuvants can reduce postoperative pain after neurosurgery in adults. However, it is still unknown whether dexmedetomidine or lidocaine can reduce postoperative pain in children undergoing craniotomy, and if yes, which is a better medicine choice. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine vs. lidocaine on postoperative pain in pediatric patients after craniotomy.Methods/designWe will perform a randomized (1:1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center trial. Children aged 1–12 years scheduled for craniotomy will be eligible for inclusion. The 255 recruited participants will be stratified by age in two strata (1–6 years and 7–12 years), and then each stratum will be equally randomized to three groups: group D (infusion of dexmedetomidine [intervention group]), group L (infusion of lidocaine [intervention group]), and group C (infusion of normal saline [control group]). Patients will be followed up at 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome will be total sufentanil consumption within 24 h after surgery.DiscussionIn this clinical trial, we expect to clarify and compare the postoperative analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine vs. lidocaine infusion on pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. We believe that the results of this trial will provide more choices for postoperative analgesia for the pediatric population.Trial registrationChinese ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR1800019411. Registered on 10 November 2018

Effects of S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on the early recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer and explore its impact on patients' early recovery. Methods: One hundred and ten patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2020 to March 2021, were divided into two groups (n=55) using a random number table: group S received PCIA, with continuous infusion of S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil, while group C received PCIA, with continuous infusion of sufentanil. PCIA was initiated at the end of the surgery, and the formulations were as follows: group S, S(+)-ketamine (1.44 mg/kg), sufentanil (1.05 μg/kg), ketorolac tromethamine (2.0 mg/kg) and tropisetron (5 mg), in 100 ml of normal saline; group C: sufentanil (1.50 μg/kg), ketorolac tromethamine (2.0 mg/kg) and tropisetron (5 mg), in 100 ml of normal saline. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale were recorded at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 h after the surgery. The incidence of remedial analgesia, the effective compressions number of PCI during 48 h after the operation. Time to first ambulation, time to first anal exhaust, time to resume oral feeding were recorded. The occurrence of adverse effects was compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 10 patients were excluded during the study, including 4 cases of conversion to laparotomy, 3 cases of dropping out of the study, and 3 cases with operation time more than 4 hours. Finally, 50 cases in group S and 50 cases in group C completed the study. There were no significant differences in VAS scores and Ramsay sedation sores at all time points between two groups (all P>0.05). Likewise, there were also no significant differences in the number of remedial analgesia and effective compressions of PCIA during 48 h after the operation between the two groups (both P>0.05). The total dosage of sufentanil consumption in group S [(64±9) μg] was lower than that in group C [(95±12) μg] within 48 h of PCIA, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Time to first ambulation in group S was (1.1±0.2) d, which was shorter than that in group C [(1.6±0.5) d], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Likewise, time to first anal exhaust in group S [(1.3±0.4) d] was shorter than that in group C [(1.8±0.6) d], with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Additionally, time to resume oral feeding in group S was (2.5±0.6) d, which was shorter than that in group C [(3.1±0.7) d], and there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus in group S were 4.0%, 2.0% and 0, which were lower than that in group C (16.0%, 10% and 8.0%, respectively), with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). No case with psychiatric symptoms was found in both groups. Conclusion: When used for postoperative intravenous analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil can provide satisfactory analgesic effects, decrease total consumption of sufentanil and the incidence of adverse effects, and thus facilitate patients' early recovery.

Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block with Ropivacaine and Adjuvant Dexmedetomidine Produced Longer Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Trial.

Purpose This study evaluated the postoperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided single-point thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) combined with dexmedetomidine (DEX) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods Sixty adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–III were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 20 each). G group: patients received routine general anesthesia; PR group: patients received 0.5% ropivacaine; and PRD group: patients received 0.5% ropivacaine with 1 μg/kg DEX. TPVB was performed in the T5 space before surgery, and then, general anesthesia induction and video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were performed. Analgesics were administered through the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device intravenously. The background infusion of each PCA device was set to administer 0.02 μg/kg/h sufentanil, with a lockout time of 15 min, and a total allowable volume is 100 ml. Results Compared to PR and G groups, the total sufentanil consumption after operation, the times of analgesic pump pressing, the pain score, and the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting in the PRD group were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Also, the duration of first time of usage of the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was longer. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during operation were lower in the PRD group as compared with the other two groups in most of the time. However, hypotension and arrhythmia occurred in three groups with no statistically significant difference. Conclusions A small volume of TPVB with ropivacaine and DEX by single injection produced longer analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, reduced postoperative opioids consumption, and the incidence of side effects.

Ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundUltrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block is rarely used for postoperative analgesia, and its value remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy for mediastinal mass resection.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, enrolled 41 participants aged 18–65 years. The patients scheduled for mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy were randomly assigned were randomized into 2 groups, and preoperatively administered 2 injections of ropivacaine (PSI) and saline (control) groups, respectively, in the 3rd and 5th parasternal intercostal spaces with ultrasound-guided (USG) bilateral parasternal intercostal nerve block. Sufentanil via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all participants postoperatively. Pain score, total sufentanil consumption, and postoperative adverse events were recorded within the first 24 h.ResultsThere were 20 and 21 patients in the PSI and control group, respectively. The PSI group required 20% less PCIA-sufentanil compared with the control group (54.05 ± 11.14 μg vs. 67.67 ± 8.92 μg, P < 0.001). In addition, pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were significantly lower in the PSI group compared with control patients, both at rest and upon coughing within 24 postoperative hours. Postoperative adverse events were generally reduced in the PSI group compared with controls.ConclusionsUSG bilateral parasternal intercostal nerve block effectively reduces postoperative pain and adjuvant analgesic requirement, with good patient satisfaction, therefore constituting a good option for mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy.

Postoperative analgesia of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine in pediatric craniotomy patients: a protocol for a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial

BackgroundModerate-to-severe postoperative pain following craniotomy has a high incidence in pediatric patients. Such pain may cause agitation, intracranial hypertension, epileptic seizures, and postoperative hematoma, which affect morbidity and mortality. Although scalp nerve block (SNB) achieves satisfactory pain relief except for suboccipital mid-craniotomy in adults and ropivacaine is widely used as a long-acting peripheral nerve block agent in children, there are few studies of SNB with ropivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. In addition, the neurosurgery operation time is relatively long, but the duration of action of SNB is limited. It is generally believed that postoperative SNB is better than preoperative SNB for postoperative analgesia. However, considering the concept of preemptive analgesia, we believe that preoperative SNB may achieve a longer postoperative analgesia effect than we expected.MethodsThis trial is a single-institution, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. A total of 180 children aged between 1 and 12 years who are undergoing elective craniotomy will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to three groups: group B (preoperative ropivacaine block group), group A (postoperative ropivacaine block group), and group N (nonblocking control group). This randomization will be stratified by age in two strata (1–6 years and 7–12 years). The primary outcome is the total consumption of sufentanil within 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes include assessment of pain scores, total consumption of sufentanil and emergency-remedy medicine consumption at observation points, the occurrence of postoperative complications, and the length of hospitalization after surgery.DiscussionThis study is designed to explore the effect and feasibility of SNB with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. Further aims are to compare the effects of preoperative and postoperative SNB on postoperative analgesia in order to identify whether there is a preemptive analgesic effect and determine the better time to implement SNB in pediatric patients during craniotomy.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800017386. Registered on 27 July 2018.

Evaluation of ultrasound-guided continuous anterior quadratus lumborum block on postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty

Objective To evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided continuous anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty. Methods Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ patients of both sexes, aged 65-80 yr, weighing 45-80 kg, scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty under subarachnoid block, were divided into 2 groups (n=25 each) using a random number table method: ultrasound-guided continuous anterior quadratus lumborum block group (group Q) and routine analgesia group (group R). Anterior QLB was performed at the end of operation in group Q. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was performed with sufentanil after operation in two groups.Dezocine was given as rescue analgesic.Ramsay sedation score and the maximum angle for hip flexion and abduction of hip joint were recorded after operation, and the total consumption of sufentanil, requirement for dezocine and occurrence of adverse reactions were recorded within 72 h after operation.The occurrence of QLB-related complications was also recorded. Results Compared with group R, Ramsay sedation score was significantly decreased and the maximum angle for hip flexion and abduction of hip joint were increased at each time point after operation, and the total consumption of sufentanil, requirement for dezocine and incidence of nausea and vomiting were decreased in group Q (P<0.05). No QLB-related complications were found in group Q. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided continuous anterior QLB can produce better postoperative analgesia and reduce postoperative consumption of opioids with fewer adverse reactions in the patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Key words: Ultrasonography; Psoas muscles; Nerve block; Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Analgesia, patient-controlled

Comparison postoperative analgesia between erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block in thoracoscopic surgery

Objective To investigate the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided vertical spinal block (ESPB) in elderly patients after thoracoscopic surgery. Methods 40 elderly patients, aged 60-75 years, were selected for selective thoracoscopic surgery. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, ESPB group (E group) and paravertebral block (PVB) group (P group). In the E group, 0.33% ropivacaine 30 ml was injected between the T5 vertebral body transverse and the erector spines before surgery, and 0.33% ropivacaine 30 ml was injected into the thoracic paravertebral space of T5-T6 in the P group. Patients in both groups were treated with sufentanil for postoperative patient controlled analgesia (PCA). The dosage of remifentanil intraoperative and sufentanil postoperative, remedial cases recorded in post anesthesia care unit (PACU), numeric rating scale (NRS) score at postoperative 1 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h were recorded, and intraoperative hypotension, postoperative nausea and vomiting cases, and operation time were documented. Results There was no significant difference in remifentanil dosage between the two groups (P>0.05). The total consumption of sufentanil in group E 24 hours after operation was higher than that in group P (P 0.05). The NRS score recorded at postoperative 1 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h show no difference. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting and intraoperative hypotension in the two groups. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided single ESPB block provides postoperative analgesia, which is similar but weaker compared with PVB and easy to operate. Key words: Nerve block; Paraspinal muscles; Ultrasonography; Thoracoscopy; Analgesia

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thorascopic surgery

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Methods Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 18-24 kg/m2, scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, were divided into 3 groups (n=20 each) using a random number table method: control group (group C), thoracic paravertebral block(PVB)group (group PVB) and group SAPB.After the patients were turned to contralateral position, thoracic PVB was performed at T4, 6 thoracic vertebrae on the affected side under ultrasound guidance, and 0.25% ropivacaine 20 ml was injected in group PVB.In group SAPB, ultrasound-guided SAPB was performed on the affected side, and 0.33% ropivacaine 30 ml was injected.Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed at the end of surgery.PCIA pump was pressed when numerical rating scale scores>3 after surgery and flurbiprofen axetil 2 mg/kg was intravenously injected when the efficacy was inadequate.The requirement for PCIA pressing, total consumption of drugs during PCIA and requirement for flurbiprofen axetil were recorded at day 3 after surgery.The consumption of sufentanil during operation was recorded, the dose was calculated, and the total amount of sufentanil consumed was recorded.The development of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pulmonary infection and chronic pain was also recorded. Results Compared with group C, the consumption, dose and total consumption of sufentanil were significantly decreased, the number of pressing times of PCIA and total consumption of drugs during PCIA were decreased, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was decreased in PVB and SAPB groups (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic pain among the three groups (P>0.05), and no patients required additional flurbiprofen axetil. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided SAPB provides good efficacy for postoperative analgesia in the patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with fewer adverse effects. Key words: Nerve block; Ultrasonography; Analgesia, postoperative; Thoracoscopy

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Effect of perioperative infusion of Dexmedetomidine combined with Sufentanil on quality of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: a CONSORT-prospective, randomized, controlled trial

BackgroundPostoperative pain is one of the most common symptoms after surgery, which brings physical discomfort to patients. In addition, it may cause a series of complications, and even affect the long-term quality of life. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil to attenuate postoperative pain in patients after laparoscopic nephrectomy.MethodsNinety patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy were randomized into three groups: the control (sufentanil 0.02 μg/kg/h, Group C), sufentanil plus low dose of dexmedetomidine (0.02 μg/kg/h each, Group D1), and sufentanil plus high dose of dexmedetomidine (0.04 μg/kg/h, Group D2). The patient-controlled analgesia was programmed to deliver a bolus dose of 0.5 ml, followed by an infusion of 2 ml/h and a lockout time of 10 min. The primary goal was to calculate the cumulative amount of self-administered sufentanil; the secondary goals were to estimate pain intensity using the numerical rating scale (NRS), level of sedation, the first bowel movement, concerning adverse effects as well as duration of postoperative hospital stay.ResultsThe total consumption of sufentanil in group D1 and D2 were significantly lower than in group C during the first 8 h after surgery (P < 0.05), whereas there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between group D1 and D2. Compared with group C, the NRS scores at rest during first 8 h after surgery were significantly lower in group D1 (P < 0.05). The NRS scores, neither at rest nor with movement, show statistically significant differences between group D1 and D2 at each time point following surgery (P > 0.05). The time to first flatus was shorter in group D1 compared with the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, compared with group C, group D1 and D2 had a shorter time for first defecation (P < 0.05).ConclusionsDexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil showed better postoperative analgesia without adverse effects, as well as facilitated bowel movements for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.Trial registrationWe registered this study in a Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) centre on Dec 23 2015 and received the registration number: ChiCTR-IPR-15007628.

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine mixed with sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in patients undergoing transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine mixed with sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)in the patients undergoing transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization(TACE). Methods One hundred and twenty patients of both sexes, aged 40-65 yr, weighing 45-80 kg, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ, scheduled for elective TACE under monitored anesthesia care, were divided into 2 groups(n=60 each)using a random number table: sufentanil group(S group)and dexmedetomidine mixed with sufentanil group(DS group). At 15 min prior to surgery, 0.1 μg/kg sufentanil and 5 mg tropisetron were intravenously injected in both groups.In addition, dexmedetomidine 0.6 μg/kg was intravenously infused for 15 min in DS group, while the equal volume of normal saline was given instead in S group.PCIA solution contained sufentanil 2 μg/kg and tropisetron 5 mg in 100 ml of normal saline in S group.PCIA solution contained sufentanil 2 μg/kg, dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg and tropisetron 5 mg in 100 ml of normal saline in DS group.The PCIA pump was programmed to deliver a 0.5 ml bolus dose with a lockout interval of 15 min and background infusion of 2 ml/h.Observer′s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale scores and scores for patient′s satisfaction with analgesia were recorded at 30 min and 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery.The pressing times of PCIA, total consumption of sufentanil and requirement for morphine as rescue analgesics were recorded.The development of requirement for antiemetics, nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, respiratory depression and agitation was also recorded during analgesia. Results Compared with S group, the pressing times of PCIA, total consumption of sufentanil and requirement for morphine were significantly reduced, scores for satisfaction with analgesia were increased, and Observer′s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale scores were decreased(P 0.05). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine mixed with sufentanil produces better efficacy than sufentanil alone when used for PCIA in the patients undergoing TACE. Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Sufentanil; Hepatic artery; Embolization, therapeutic; Analgesia, patient-controlled

Effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in patients undergoing open gastrectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Objectives:The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether dexmedetomidine could potentiate the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine, when added to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in patients undergoing open gastrectomy.Methods:Fifty patients scheduled for open gastrectomy were divided into 2 equal groups that were received wound infiltration using 20 mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2 mL normal saline (group R) or 20 mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2 mL 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (group DR). Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump press number, sufentanil consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and wound healing score were recorded.Results:The VAS pain score were comparable between the 2 groups at the observation time points (P > .05), PCA pump press number and sufentanil consumption were higher in group R than that in group DR at 0 to 2, 2 to 4, 4 to 6 time intervals (P < .05) except for 6 to 8, 8 to 10, 10 to 12 time intervals (P > .05), meanwhile, the 24 hours total sufentanil consumption was also higher in group R than that in group DR (90.4 ± 20.5 vs 79.2 ± 9.4) (P < .05), there were no significant differences in PONV and wound healing score between the 2 groups (P > .05).Conclusions:Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for wound infiltration promoted the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine, reduced sufentanil consumption, and had no effect on wound healing; it could be as an ideal adjuvant which could potentiate the analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics.