Total Rescue Analgesic Consumption Research Articles

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study to Assess and Compare the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy Under General Anaesthesia

Abstract Background and Aims: Multimodal analgesia regimens for optimizing the postoperative pain following abdominal surgeries are a crucial component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), as it reduces postoperative opioid consumption along with their adverse effects. We compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLB) versus posterior transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) with respect to duration of analgesia, modified Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) scores for pain, activity, sleep, stress, and mood, respectively, the total amount of rescue analgesic consumption, hemodynamics parameters and side effects, in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this study, which was prospective, randomized, and double-blind, 60 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and II, aged 18–65 years, undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, were randomized into two groups. Group QLB (n = 30) and Group TAPB (n = 30) received bilateral QLB and TAPB with 40 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine, respectively. The data were compared using standard qualitative and quantitative tests. Results: The duration of pain relief was longer in Group QLB compared to Group TAPB (981.83 ± 138.62 min vs. 637 ± 127.02 min, P < 0.0001). The DVPRS score for pain, activity, sleep, stress, and mood, respectively, were significantly lower in Group QLB (P < 0.05). The total rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lesser in Group QLB (103.33 ± 18.26 mg) compared to Group TAPB (150.00 ± 50.85 mg) (P < 0.0001). No significant hemodynamic changes or side effects were observed (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Bilateral QLB significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia with reduced rescue analgesic requirement compared with bilateral TAPB in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

Comparison of postoperative analgesia and side effects in pediatric laparoscopic surgery with morphine and nalbuphine

There is currently no consensus on the optimal perioperative pain management strategy involving specific opioids. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesia, the associated side effects between nalbuphine and morphine in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery. One hundred ninety children were randomly assigned to nalbuphine (0.2mg/kg) or morphine (0.2mg/kg). Nalbuphine's analgesic effect was non-inferior to morphine, with similar total rescue analgesic consumption during PACU stay (0.03± 0.05mg vs. 0.04± 0.06mg, p>0.05). Nalbuphine group had a lower incidence of respiratory depression (RR ≤ 10/min) (4.8% vs. 38.6%, p<0.001), PONV (2.4% vs. 18.1%, p= 0.002), and pruritus (0% vs. 16.9%, p<0.001) than morphine. Additionally, nalbuphine showed a shorter laryngeal mask airway removal time (13.9 [12.7, 15.1]) compared with morphine (17.0 [15.1, 18.9], p= 0.011). Nalbuphine provides equipotent analgesia with significantly lower incidences of respiratory depression, PONV, and pruritus compared with morphine in pediatric laparoscopic surgery.

Comparison of dose–response to two different doses of intravenous lidocaine for analgesia in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia

BackgroundVarious studies have demonstrated the analgesic benefit of systemic lidocaine in the perioperative setting, especially during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. However, the best appropriate dose for an administered bolus and continuous infusion of lignocaine is unclear. Our aim is to compare the effect of two different doses of intravenous lidocaine for analgesia in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Fifty-four patients of ASA PS I or II, aged between 18 and 65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 26 patients each. Patients in group A received an intravenous bolus injection of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg slowly over 10 min, prior to induction and then followed by a continuous infusion at the rate of 1.5 mg/kg/h via infusion pump whereas group B patients received intravenous lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg slowly over 10 min followed by infusion at the rate of 2 mg/kg/h. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by VAS score, time to first analgesic dose, and total consumption of rescue analgesic in 24 h.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference in mean VAS Scores between the two groups at different time intervals postoperatively. Time to first rescue analgesia was earlier in group A (30.65 min) compared to group B (49.42 min) and the difference was statistically significant. Total consumption of rescue analgesic was higher in group A with a mean of 178.85 mg compared to 126.92 mg in group B.ConclusionBoth the infusion doses of Lidocaine provided clinically adequate analgesia postoperatively but the infusion dose of 2 mg/kg/h had a mean VAS score significantly lower than 1.5 mg/kg/h.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management following Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Single-Center, Single-Blind, Parallel Design Study.

Conventional postoperative pain management, with an intravenous patient-controlled approach or thoracic epidural analgesia, has proved suboptimal following a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Considering its postulated mechanism of action, we encouraged cryoanalgesia as an effective method for postrepair pain management and a possibly superior alternative. A randomized, single-blind clinical trial was tested on patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) repair in March and December 2022. Among 101 patients, consenting study participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: cryoanalgesia (group C, n = 24) or noncryoanalgesia (group N, n = 24). Group N received conventional pain management. Comparing the results, pain levels were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS-R for resting and VAS-D for dynamic) and the total rescue analgesic consumption was determined. Intrathoracic cryoablation was performed bilaterally on the fourth and seventh intercostal nerves using a cryoprobe at -80°C for 2 minutes. The two groups had similar baseline-patient characteristics; however, group C had a longer mean operative time (159 vs. 125 minutes, p < 0.01) and experienced significantly less pain throughout the postoperative course, with VAS at 6 hours (5.38 vs. 7.04, p < 0.01) and 48 hours (3.17 vs. 5.67, p < 0.01). Cryoanalgesia improved postoperative pain control at rest and during movement following PE repair. However, the outcome was less favorable than expected because the VAS was greater than 4 (moderate pain), although after a day or two, it decreased to lower levels (VAS < 4) in the cyro group. Considering its extra invasiveness and instrumentation, a routine cryoanalgesia procedure for pectus surgery is yet to be determined.

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY COMPARING POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER WOUND INFILTRATION WITH ROPIVACAINE ALONE AND ROPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SPINE FIXATION SURGERIES WITH PROSTHESIS

Objective: To compare postoperative analgesia after wound infiltration with ropivacaine alone and ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine in spine fixation surgeries with prosthesis. This is aprospective randomized double-blind clinical trial.&#x0D; Methods: A total of 60 patients were recruited in this study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Written informed consent was obtained from every patient. Patients were randomized by computer-generated randomization into two groups. Group R received an injection ropivacaine 0.5% in a dose of 2 mg/kg for wound infiltration, while those in group RD received an injection dexmedetomidine 0.5mcg/Kg along with ropivacaine 0.5% 2 mg/kg for wound infiltration at the end of surgery. Patients were observed till 24 h postoperatively. VAS score, duration of analgesia, total rescue analgesic consumption, any side effects were observed and noted at specified time intervals.&#x0D; Results: VAS score was found to be lower in group RD at any time interval till 24 h postoperatively, with a p value = 0.004. Time to first rescue analgesic demand was 281.43±11.1 min in group R while it was 912.57±52.61 min in group RD. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p value = 0.01). In group R, 200±39.39 mg of tramadol was consumed as rescue analgesic, while in group RD 136.67±28.42 mg of tramadol was consumed till 24 h post-operatively. Tramadol consumption was found to be significantly low in group RD (p =0.007). No significant side effect was observed in either of the groups.&#x0D; Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for local wound infiltration improves analgesic profile, increase analgesia duration and reduces opioid requirement in patients undergoing spine surgeries with prosthesis.

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia following inguinal hernia repair

Postoperative analgesia for inguinal hernia procedures can be provided safely and effectively with USG guided TAP blocks. In the TAP block following inguinal hernia repair, we compared the analgesic effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and clonidine.: Seventy four patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided in to Group LD (n=37) and Group LC (n=37). Patients in Group LD received a unilateral USG-guided TAP block with 0.5% levobupivacaine 18ml and dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg in NS to make a total 20ml at the conclusion of surgery after regression of sensory block to the T10 dermatome, whereas patients in Group LC received 0.5% levobupivacaine 18ml and clonidine 1 μg/kg. Duration of postoperative analgesia, quality of analgesia (VAS), total rescue analgesic consumption in 24 hours and adverse effects were noted.Time for the initial application of rescue analgesia took substantially longer in Group LD (1006.49± 29.89 min) than in Group LC (512.35 ±27.14 min) (p ≤0.0001). At 8h, 16h, and 20h postoperatively, Group LD had a significantly lower VAS score both at rest and during hip flexion. It was discovered that Group LD had considerably decreased overall analgesic consumption. Incidence of postoperative side effects was comparable between two groups.: In comparison to clonidine, TAP block with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine greatly prolongs postoperative analgesia and lowers 24-hour analgesic use.

Adductor Canal Block Combined with General Analgesia for Patients with Recurrent Patellar Dislocation Undergoing "3-in-1" Procedure Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Patellar dislocation is a common injury in sports medicine. While surgical treatment is an important option, pain is severe after surgery. This study compared the analgesic effect and early rehabilitation quality between adductor canal block combined with general analgesia (ACB + GA) and single general analgesia (SGA) after recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) for "3-in-1" procedure surgery. From July 2018 to January 2020, a prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in analgesia management after RPD for "3-in-1" procedure surgery. The 40 patients in the experimental group received ACB (0.3% ropivacaine 30 mL) + GA, while the 38 patients in the control group received SGA. Patients in both groups received "3-in-1" procedure surgery, standardized anesthesia, and analgesia during hospitalization. The outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS), quadriceps strength, Inpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (IPSQ), Lysholm scores, and Kujala scores. Total rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events were also recorded. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare continuous variables between groups and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare count data. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H tests evaluated ranked data. No significant differences in resting VAS scores were observed at 8, 12, and 24h postoperatively. However, the flexion and moving VAS scores of the ACB + GA group were significantly lower than those of the SGA group (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the first triggering of rescue analgesics was advanced in the SGA group (p < 0.0001), and the dose of opioid analgesics was significantly higher (p < 0.0001). The quadriceps strength of the ACB + GA group was higher than that of the SGA group at 8 h postoperatively. The IPSQ of the ACB + GA group was significantly higher 24 h postoperatively. We observed no significant differences in Lysholm and Kujala scores between the two groups at 3 months after surgery. Early analgesia management of ACB + GA showed excellent analgesia effectiveness and a positive hospitalization experience for RPD patients undergoing "3-in-1" procedure surgery. Moreover, this management was good for early rehabilitation.

The Efficacy of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Postoperative pain is an inevitable acute pain for which a multimodal analgesic approach is required. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the efficacy of transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block as a postoperative analgesic for patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomies versus intravenous opioid analgesics. Sixtyfemale patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups following a computer-generated sequence of numbers. In group T (n=30) patients received an ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block with 20 of 0.375% levobupivacaine on each side immediately after surgery. Patients in group O (opioid group, n = 30) received intravenous (i.v.) tramadol (100mg) immediately after surgery.Rescue analgesic (inj. tramadol 50mg) i.v. bolus given in both groups if visual analog scale (VAS) >4. In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the vital signs, episodes of nausea, vomiting, and VAS score of each patient were recorded every two hours for the first 24 hours. Total consumption of rescue analgesic (inj. tramadol 50 mg i.v.) during the first 24 hours was significantly higher in group O (186.47+37.48mg) than in group T (107.28+26.34mg). No significant difference was observed in intraoperative vital parameters (HR, NIBP, SPO2). The VAS scores were significantly low in group T.Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly higher in group O (13 out of 28 patients) than in group T (five out of 28 patients) with P value =0.043. Our study indicated bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block is a good alternative to opioids for postoperative analgesia.

Comparative Evaluation of Varying Volumes of Local Anaesthetic Solution in Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) on Dynamic Pain Relief after Hip Surgeries

Background: The peri-capsular nerve group block (PENG) has reported the ability to decrease pain in hip fractures and minimize the use of opioids for postoperative analgesia. We conducted this trial to assess the efficacy of varying volumes of local anesthetic solution in PENG block in alleviating post-operative pain at rest and on dynamic hip movement after hip surgeries. Material &amp; Methods: A prospective, double-blinded interventional trial was conducted on 70 adult ASA I-III patients undergoing hip surgeries under general anesthesia. Enrolled subjects were divided into two groups A and B to receive either 10ml of 0.2% ropivacaine or 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine respectively in an ultrasound-guided (USG) PENG block after administration of general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. VAS scores (at rest and on dynamic hip movement), the cumulative amount of rescue analgesic needed in the 24-hour post-operative period and patient satisfaction scores were secondary outcomes. Data thus collected were statistically analyzed. Results: Mean duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group B (12.24±5.14 hours) as compared to group A (2.77±1.06 hours). There were statistically significant decreased VAS scores at rest and on dynamic hip movement in group B. Median total rescue analgesic consumption in 24 hours and patient satisfaction score was significantly reduced in group B than in group A (p=0.001). Conclusion: In PENG block, 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine provides a significantly longer duration of analgesia, a statistically significant reduction in pain scores on rest and dynamic hip movement with substantially decreased 24-hour total rescue analgesic consumption, and improved patient satisfaction in patients undergoing hip surgeries. Keywords: Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG), Hip surgeries, Ropivacaine, Visual analogue scale (VAS)

Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block versus wound infiltration for both acute and chronic post-caesarean pain management - A randomised controlled trial.

Background and Aims:Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block (USG-guided TFPB) has recently been evaluated for post-caesarean acute pain management. We compared it with standard wound infiltration for both acute and chronic post-caesarean pain management.Methods:All patients undergoing caesarean section (CS) under subarachnoid block were included and randomised. Patients in group C received standard wound infiltration (20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine) and group-T received bilateral USG-guided TFPB (20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine) at the end of the surgery. Acute pain assessed using numeric rating scale (NRS), time to first request of analgesia and total rescue analgesic consumption in 24 hours. The incidence of chronic persistent post-surgical pain (CPSP), neuropathic pain component and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Fisher’s exact test, Chi-square test, unpaired Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used.Results:Sixty patients were included with 30 in each group. NRS score on rest at 6th and 24th hour and on active movement at 1st hour was significantly decreased in group T. The “time to first request of analgesia” was statistically higher in group T, that is, 10.77 ± 1.39 h versus 6.30 ± 1.60 h. Five (16.6%) and two (6.6%) patients in groups C and T, respectively, required rescue analgesia in first 24 hours. 30% (n = 6) and 10% (n = 2) patients in groups C and T, respectively, developed CPSP. The neuropathic pain component was significantly reduced and QoL was significantly improved in group T.Conclusion:TFPB is efficacious for management of both acute and chronic post-caesarean pain management.

Comparative Study of Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Repair Surgeries.

Objective: The study aimed to compare an adductor canal block (ACB) with a femoral nerve block (FNB) with regard to their analgesic efficacy and the quadriceps muscle strength in patients following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear repair surgeries.Materials and Methods: Ninety patients in the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II undergoing arthroscopic ACL tear repair surgeries under subarachnoid block were divided into three groups to receive ACB (Group ACB), FNB (Group FNB), and control (Group C). Each patient was assessed for Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, tramadol consumption, and quadriceps muscle strength postoperatively in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU).Results: There was no significant difference between the Group ACB and Group FNB regarding postoperative analgesia and total rescue analgesic consumption at 24 hrs postoperative. The mean VAS score at two, four, and six hours and total rescue analgesic consumption in 24 hrs were higher in the control group, which was statistically significant (p-value <0.05). Quadriceps muscle strength by straight leg raise test was significantly higher in the Group ACB compared with the Group FNB at 0, 6, 12, 18 hours postoperatively (p-value <0.0001), whereas the difference between both study groups become statistically insignificant at 24 hours postoperative.Conclusion: ACB preserved quadriceps muscle strength better than FNB, without a significant difference in postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic ACL tear repair surgeries.

Wound Infiltration and Instillation Technique for Postoperative Analgesia Using Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries

Background: Pain relief after surgery continues to be a major medical challenge in clinical practice. Lumbar spine surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. Providing optimal analgesia locally in the area of surgical wound, with little systemic side-effects, is a favourable option and has become an intrinsic part of multimodal analgesia. We aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of local infiltration and instillation of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.Materials and methods: Forty-four adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II were randomly assigned into two groups, incorporating 22 patients per group. After the completion of lumbar spine surgery and after hemostasis was achieved, patients in group A received instillation of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the surgical wound site and patients in group B received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine infiltration into the paravertebral muscles on either side. Postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14, 20, and 24 hours; the time to first analgesic required, total rescue analgesic consumption, and adverse effects were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (Released 2011; IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, United States).Results: Time to the first analgesic requirement was significantly longer in group A (12.39±1.56 hours) compared to the B group (2.48±0.58 hours) (P < 0.001). The amount of rescue analgesia (diclofenac sodium) required was significantly higher in group B (135.00±46.17 milligrams) compared to A (93.75±33.32 milligrams) (P = 0.001). The number of analgesic demands was higher in the infiltration group compared to the instillation group and was observed to be statistically significant. Hemodynamic parameters remained comparable between the groups.Conclusion: Local instillation of surgical wound site provided better pain control than infiltration technique and is effective and safe postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laminectomy surgeries.

Effect of preemptive intramuscular diclofenac on minimal effective-dose bupivacaine saddle block for minor perianal surgeries.

Background:Preemptive analgesics are commonly used to increase analgesic efficacy and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preemptive analgesic effect of intramuscular diclofenac on minimal effective dose spinal anesthesia for perianal surgeries.Materials and Methods:Fifty patients ASA I&II were divided randomly into two groups, control group (GC N = 25) and Diclofenac group (GD N = 25), both groups received saddle block with 5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 mL (2.5 mg). Thirty minutes before the saddle block, patients in GD received 75 mg (3 mL) diclofenac intramuscularly, whereas patients in GC received 3 mL saline intramuscularly. The differences in the time for the first analgesic request, postoperative analgesic consumption as well as, visual analog scale, were our primary outcomes.Results:Fifty patients (25 in each group) undergoing perianal surgery completed the study successfully. The time to the first request of analgesia was significantly longer in GD 511.8 (108.07) min. compared to the GC 179.56 (49.24) min with P = 0.00001, as well as the total consumption of rescue analgesic (tramadol hydrochloride) was significantly less in GD 66 (23.8) mg compared to 104 (28.5) mg in the GC with P = 0.00001.Conclusion:Preemptive intramuscular diclofenac sodium with minimal dose bupivacaine saddle block significantly minimized the postoperative analgesic consumption and delayed the first analgesia request after perianal surgery.

Abstract No. : ABS1591: Effect of erector spinae block and PECS block on quality of recovery and analgesia after modified radical mastectomy

Background and Aims:Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women ; modified radical mastectomy is one of the standard treatments.This study compared the effect of erector spinae block and pectoralis(PECS) block on quality of recovery and analgesia after modified radical mastectomyMethods:The present randomised controlled double-blind study was conducted on 90 patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. The patients were randomised into group-I (PECS block 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine, n=30), group-II (erector spinae block 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine, n=30) and group-III (control group, n=30). Along with clinical anddemographical data, the requirement of the first dose of rescue analgesia, total rescue analgesic consumption, visual analogue scale(VAS) scores and Quality of Recovery(QoR) -40 scoreswere compared. Anaesthesia and surgical interventions were done as per standard protocol.Results:Mean first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly delayed in group-I followed by group-II compared to controls . Mean total rescue analgesic consumption was much lower in group-I and group-II as compared to group-III and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001)(figure 1). Mean VAS scores were also much lower in group-I followed by group-II as compared to group-III at different follow-ups, and difference was statistically significant. The global QoR-40 at 24 hours showed significantly better outcomes in group-1(table 1)Figure 1Global QoR-40 between the groupsTable 1Postoperative tramadol requirementAnalgesic requirementGroup B (n=30)Group C (n=30) P Time for 1st need of tramadol (h)8.10±1.480.7±0.38<0.001Total tramadol consumption (mg)68±48.55210±52.65<0.0001Total numberof patients requiring tramadol (%) 24 h10 (33.33%)30 (100%)<0.0001Table 1Quality of Recovery(QoR) -40 scores between the groupsGlobal QoR-40 (0-200)Group I (n=30)Group-II (n=30)Group-III (n=30) P Pre-operative186.63±7.78185.53±6.73186.34±7.56P=0.8360At 24 h183.64±6.36179.68±6.38171.37±6.88P<0.001* P t=1.63, P=0.1086t=3.455, P=0.0010*t=8.021, P<0.001*Conclusion:Both PECS and ESP block can be used efficaciously for providing analgesia in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. However, PECS shows better outcomes.

Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided TAP Block with the Standard PostOperative Analgesic Regimen, In Providing Post-Operative Analgesia for Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomies

Introduction: A recent development in the treatment of post-operative pain is the use of peripheral nerve blocks. The technique involves blocking the conduction of nerve impulses by deposition of local anaesthetic around the nerve or nerves supplying the area of interest. Consequently, the sensory and/ or motor supply to the area supplied by the nerves, are effectively abolished, thus helping to achieve anaesthesia and analgesia. Methodology: The patients were selected by convenience sampling and those who matched the selection criterion, were briefed about the nature of the study and the procedures involved, in a language understood by them and written informed consent was taken. Descriptive data of the patient such as name, age, sex and detailed medical history, was collected. They were randomized into two groups with the help of computerized randomization software. Results: In our study it was noted that the mean total rescue analgesic consumption in patients belonging to Group S (over a period of 24 hours) was 73.3 mg. Whereas the mean total rescue analgesic consumption in Group T was only 35 mg. This difference in the mean total rescue analgesic consumption between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p value &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Patients in both Group T and Group S experienced some degree of nausea at the 2, 4 and 6 hour intervals, but the PONV scores of both the groups were comparable. Thereafter, patients in both the groups were asymptomatic.

Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study.

Study DesignThis was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study.PurposeThoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after thoracolumbar spine instrumentation wherein an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon intraoperatively.Overview of LiteratureVery few studies have reported the use of epidural dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries. When used via the epidural route, dexmedetomidine is safe and efficacious and is associated with reduced rescue analgesia consumption, increased duration of analgesia, reduced pain scores, but not with major hemodynamic adverse effects.MethodsTotal 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I–III adult patients aged 18–65 years who were scheduled to undergo thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation were randomly allocated into group RD (epidural ropivacaine+dexmedetomidine) or group R (epidural ropivacaine plus saline). We aimed to compare the total rescue analgesic consumption on postoperative day 0, 1, and 2. Moreover, we studied the time to first rescue analgesia with visual analogue scale score <4 and the overall patient satisfaction scores.ResultsThere was no difference between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. The mean value of total rescue analgesia consumption was 162.5±68.4 mg in the RD group and 247.5±48.8 mg in the R group. The mean time to first rescue analgesia was 594.6±83.0 minutes in the RD group and 103.6±53.2 minutes in the R group. The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.2±0.7 in the RD group and 3.2±0.6 in the R group. No patient had any respiratory depression or prolonged motor blockade during the postoperative period.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the superior efficacy, in terms of postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction scores, of epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine over that of ropivacaine alone in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar spine.

Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled study

Context Ultrasound (US)-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a new abdominal truncal block used for perioperative pain management of both upper and lower abdominal surgeries. Aims To compare the analgesic efficacy of US-guided QLB with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Settings Approval of Zagazig Institutional Review Board (IRB) was obtained (ZU-IRB # 5504/16-9-2018) before the study, and patient’s informed written consent was also obtained. Our clinical study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04031196). A total of 34 pediatric patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic appendectomy were randomly allocated in two equal groups: QLB and TAP block groups. Patients and methods All patients received general anesthesia using intravenous 2 mg/kg propofol, 1 µg/kg fentanyl, and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. After induction of anesthesia, QLB group received bilateral US-guided QLB type 2, using 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% levobupivacaine, whereas TAP block group received bilateral US-guided TAP block using 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% levobupivacaine. The primary outcomes were changes of intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative pain assessment. Secondary outcomes were total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, the first time of rescue analgesics, total rescue analgesic consumption in the first postoperative 24 h, and degree of parent satisfaction. Results QLB group had statistically significant lower hemodynamic changes 15 min after performing the block to the end of surgery (P Conclusion This study revealed that QLB provides longer and more effective postoperative analgesia compared with TAP block in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

Analgesic sparing effect of dexamethasone with levobupivacaine in quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomised controlled trial.

Background:Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) provides somatic and visceral analgesia to the lower thoracic and abdominal wall. The aim was to investigate the analgesic effect of dexamethasone with levobupivacaine in QLB in patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair surgery.Methods:A total of 90 patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I/II were randomly divided into two groups. Group L received 0.25% levobupivacaine (20 ml) + normal saline (1 ml) and group D received 0.25% levobupivacaine (20 ml) + 4 mg dexamethasone (1 ml) in QL plane on the operated side using ultrasound, after completion of surgery under spinal anaesthesia. The primary objective was to compare time for first rescue analgesia. The secondary objectives were total rescue analgesic consumption and numeric rating scale (NRS) in the first 24 h.Results:The demographic data age, sex, height, weight and ASA were comparable in both groups. The mean time to request for first rescue analgesia was longer in group D compared to group L (1016.02 ± 205.97 min versus 640 ± 132.96 min; P < 0.0001). The mean total tramadol consumption in the first 24 h was lower in group D compared to group L (233.55 ± 86.92 mg versus 328.22 ± 78.74 mg; P < 0.0001). Patients in group D had significantly lower NRS scores at rest and on movement as compared to group L.Conclusions:The addition of dexamethasone to levobupivacaine in QLB results in prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia, less rescue analgesic requirements and better quality of analgesia as compared to levobupivacaine in unilateral inguinal hernia repair surgery.

Comparison of postoperative analgesia after intraarticular injection of two different doses of morphine (5 mg) and Morphine (10 mg) with 0.5% bupivacaine in arthroscopic knee surgery : Randomized, double blinded prospective study

Comparison of postoperative analgesia after intraarticular injection of two different doses of morphine (5 mg) and Morphine (10 mg) with 0.5% bupivacaine in arthroscopic knee surgery : Randomized, double blinded prospective study - IJCA- Print ISSN No: - 2394-4781 Online ISSN No:- 2394-4994 Article DOI No:- 10.18231/j.

Preoperative versus Postoperative Rectus Sheath Block for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background: Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is multifactorial and usually not effectively treated. Rectus sheath block (RSB) has been proven to reduce the pain from midline abdominal incision and laparoscopic surgery. We investigated the preemptive analgesic effect of RSB after LC. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single-center trial, 200 patients undergoing LC were randomized into preoperative RSB (pre-RSB) or postoperative RSB (post-RSB) group. An ultrasound-guided RSB was performed before skin incision in the pre-RSB group or after skin closure in the post-RSB group. The primary outcome was total rescue analgesic consumption at 24 h post-surgery. The secondary outcomes were cumulated rescue analgesic consumption and postoperative pain measured by numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 1, 2, 6, 9, 18, and 24 h post-surgery. Results: Total rescue analgesic consumption at 24 h post-surgery was significantly lower in the pre-RSB group than in the post-RSB group (p = 0.020). The cumulated rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the pre-RSB group than in the post-RSB group at 1 h (p = 0.023), 9 h (p = 0.020) and 18 h (p = 0.002) post-surgery. NRS was significantly lower in the pre-RSB group than in the post-RSB group at 0 h post-surgery (p = 0.023). Conclusion: The pre-RSB reduced the analgesic requirements in patients undergoing LC compared with the post-RSB.