Total Checklist Research Articles

A checklist of marine phytoplankton species of Northeast Brazil

The oceanic zone of Northeast Brazil in the southwestern tropical Atlantic Ocean is characterised by the presence of a variety of current systems. Thus, it has the potential to host a large diversity of phytoplankton species. In this context, we propose a comprehensive checklist of documented marine phytoplankton species in this region. To this end, we have compiled all the published material and supplemented it with original data from two comprehensive surveys, the ABRAÇOS surveys, covering the shelf, slope, and offshore areas of Northeast Brazil. Even if few articles were atrieved from our review research, a total of 719 phytoplankton taxa are reported, including 98 new records plus 45 potential new records from the ABRACOS data. Most taxa are accompanied by a comprehensive library of illustrations. The two major phytoplankton groups, dinoflagellates and diatoms, contributed similarly to the total checklist richness, which is consistent with the global phytoplankton diversity. The contribution of nano- and microphytoplankton varies between areas. The shelf displays a greater diversity of pennate and small/medium-sized diatoms. This may be attributed to the inputs from estuarine rivers as well as the resuspension of benthic diatoms. Conversely, dinoflagellates are more prevalent offshore, demonstrating their adaptability to changing nutritional conditions, by employing numerous metabolic and growth strategies to survive. This checklist, which reveals an remarkable diversity of nano- and microphytoplankton in Northeast Brazil, provides a valuable reference for scientists and managers to monitor community evolution under global change.

Development and Validation of an Equine Castration Model and Rubric.

Castration is one of the most common surgeries performed in equine practice. Veterinary students require deliberate practice to reach competence in surgical procedures including equine castration, but availability of patients limits students' practice opportunities. A recumbent equine castration model was created and evaluated using a validation framework consisting of content evidence (expert opinion), internal structure evidence (reliability of scores produced by the accompanying rubric), and evidence of relationship with other variables, specifically the difference in scores between experts and students. A convenience sample of third-year students who had never performed equine castration (n = 24) and veterinarians who had performed equine castration (n = 25) performed surgery on the model while being video recorded. Participants completed a post-operative survey about the model. All veterinarians (100%) agreed or strongly agreed that the model was suitable for teaching students the steps to perform equine castration and for assessing students' skill. The checklist produced scores with good internal consistency (α = 0.805). Veterinarians performed the castration faster than the students (p = .036) and achieved a higher total global rating score (p = .003). There was no significant difference between groups in total checklist score or individual checklist items, except veterinarians were more likely to check both sides for bleeding (p = .038). The equine castration model and rubric validated in this study can be used in a low-stress clinical skills environment to improve students' skills to perform what is otherwise a challenging field procedure. Model use should be followed with live animal practice to complete the learning process.

Markers for Major Complications at Day-One Postoperative in Fast-Track Metabolic Surgery: Updated Metabolic Checklist

IntroductionIn fast-track metabolic surgery, the window to identify complications is narrow. Postoperative checklists can be useful tools in the decision-making of safe early discharge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of a checklist used in metabolic surgery.MethodsRetrospective data from June 2018 to January 2021 was collected on all patients that underwent metabolic surgery in a high-volume bariatric hospital in the Netherlands. Patients without an available checklist were excluded. The primary outcome was major complications and the secondary outcomes were minor complications, readmission, and unplanned hospital visits within 30 days postoperatively.ResultsMajor complications within 30 days postoperatively occurred in 62/1589 (3.9%) of the total included patients. An advise against early discharge was significantly more seen in patients with major complications compared to those without major complications (90.3% versus 48.1%, P < 0.001, respectively), and a negative checklist (advice for discharge) had a negative predictive value of 99.2%. The area under the curve for the total checklist was 0.80 (P < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of ≥3 positive points, the sensitivity and specificity were 65% and 82%, respectively. Individual parameters from the checklist: oral intake, mobilization, calf pain, willingness for discharge, heart rate, drain (>30 ml/24 h), hemoglobin, and leukocytes count were also significantly different between groups.ConclusionThis checklist is a valuable tool to decide whether patients can be safely discharged early. Heart rate appeared to be the most predictive parameter for the development of major complications. Future studies should conduct prediction models to identify patients at risk for major complications.Graphical

The effect of education of patients with type 2 diabetes at risk of covid-19 on symptoms and some metabolic outcomes: A randomized controlled study

ObjectiveType 2 diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. It also has a high risk of morbidity and mortality in the covid 19 pandemic. Due to pandemic measures, disruptions have emerged in the care treatments of patients with type 2 diabetes. The present study aimed to determine the effects of telehealth monitoring and patient training on the symptoms and metabolic outcomes in the patients with type 2 diabetes who are at risk of COVID-19. MethodologyThe current study is in the design of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into intervention group (n=41) and control group (n = 44). The patients in the intervention group received diabetes training once a week for the first 4 weeks and every other week for weeks 5–12. No training was given to the control group. The data was collected using the socio-demographic information form, the questionnaire of diabetes treatment, the form of metabolic control variables, and the Diabetes Symptoms Checklist. The data was analyzed with Chi-square, independent samples t-test, and paired sample t-test. ResultsThe mean age of the patients in the control group was 56.86 ± 9.40, and the mean age of those in the intervention group was 54.12 ± 8.32. After the training, a statistically significant difference was found between the checklist averages of the groups in the subscale of hyperglycemia. However, a statistically significant difference was found between the subscales of neurology, cardiology, cognition, hyperglycemia, and the total checklist averages in the intervention group before and after the training (p < 0.05). In the control group, there was a statistically significant difference between the subscale of hyperglycemia and the total checklist averages at the beginning and 3 months later (p < 0.05). ConclusionIt has been determined that the disease training given to the patients with diabetes via telehealth monitoring during the COVID-19 process has a positive effect on the diabetes control of the patients. Health education through telehealth methods can be an effective and cost-effective strategy to support patients with diabetes.

Evaluation of children with ADHD and their psychiatric symptoms

" Background: Mental disorders, especially in children, can be manifested in different ways, which is of great importance to them, so the purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate the changes in psychiatric symptoms in children with ADHD. Method: This evaluation was performed as a descriptive-analytic study on 141 children with ADHD who were followed up for 6 months. At the beginning of the study and the third and sixth months after, patients' symptoms were assessed with the CBCL Behavior Checklist and the ADHD rating scale questionnaire, as well as the course of illness and association with other disorders. Finally, the data were entered into SPSS statistical software and analyzed. Results: The mean age of the children was 5.89±0.81 years and the prevalence of males was 68.8%. Among the two treatment groups, only the mean score below the ADHD-RS questionnaire score in the non-Ritalin group at the end of the third and sixth months was significantly lower than the Ritalin group. During the study in both treatment groups, the overall ADHD-RS questionnaire and both subscales of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) had a significant decrease from baseline to the end of the sixth month. In relation to the CBCL behavioral checklist, the mean score of the total checklist except for anxiety/depression in the non-Ritalin group and the somatic complaints subscale in the Ritalin group decreased significantly from baseline to the end of the sixth month. Conclusion: Based on the results observed in this evaluation, Ritalin had a significant effect on the symptoms of patients with ADHD, although these symptoms improved in both groups, however, further studies are needed"

A three-dimensional (3D) printed simulator as a feasible assessment tool for evaluating hip arthroscopy skills

PurposeThe aims of this study were (1) to develop a three-dimensional (3D) printed simulator that facilitates the simulation of surgical skills for portal placement, intra-articular identification of anatomical structures and arthroscope navigation for hip arthroscopy and (2) to concurrently examine the feasibility of using this simulator as an assessment tool to evaluate trainees’ surgical competencies.MethodsA simulator was developed using a combination of medical imaging, computer-aided design, and 3D printing. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 29 participants divided into 3 subgroups (novice, intermediate and experienced). All participants performed related skills on the simulator, and their performance was evaluated using different assessment parameters. The participants’ qualitative feedback regarding the simulator was also collected. The data collated from each group of participants were subsequently compared.ResultsSignificant differences were observed between the three subgroups of participants with regard to the total checklist score (F2,26 = 11.3), total Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation score (F2,26 = 92.1), overall final global rating scale score (F2,26 = 49), number of times the participants used fluoroscopy (F2,26 = 7.4), and task completion times (F2,26 = 23.5). The participants’ performance in the simulated operation was correlated with their prior clinical experience. There was mainly positive feedback with regard to the fidelity and utility of the simulator in relation to the surgeons’ prior clinical experience.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that a reliable hip arthroscopic simulator can be developed for use by orthopedic surgeons to evaluate their hip arthroscopic skills before performing actual surgical operations.Level of evidenceLevel III.

A new educational tool for neuropsychological test raters in the dementia field: A Delphi study

Neuropsychological testing is the primary endpoint of clinical research in the field of dementia, making it essential for the rater to accurately calculate test data for an extensive assessment. However, many raters lack adequate skill to complete neuropsychological tests with sufficient confidence. Therefore, we developed and examined the utility of a checklist and a manual as tools for educating raters on their basic behaviours when conducting comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations in the field of dementia. We conducted a seven-step comprehensive study to develop rater training tools and examine their usefulness between April 2019 and February 2021 involving: 1. Development of a draft checklist, 2. Delphi review rounds, 3. Design of the final checklist, 4. Item weighting, 5. Examination of reliability, 6. Creating the manual, and 7. Examination of the usefulness of learning through rater educational tools (checklist and manual). The Delphi review round led to a highly reliable and valid checklist and manual. The total checklist score improved significantly (t= 2.37, P =0.029) before and after manual learning. We found that the appropriate basic behaviours required by the rater to conduct neuropsychological testing skilfully within the dementia field could be acquired with this tool. Using a robust development process, we integrated expert knowledge and experience, and developed a checklist and a manual for learning the basic behaviours of neuropsychological test raters in the field of dementia. Establishing standards of basic behaviour for neuropsychological raters will help promote dementia research and advances in medicine.

WE3.9 Operative competence should be assessed on a procedure-specific basis: analysis of submitted Supervised Structured Assessments of Operative Performance (SSAOPs) by Core Surgical Trainees in Ireland using Generalisability Theory

Abstract Introduction Competency-based training programmes require reliable summative assessment methods. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of the Supervised Structured Assessment of Operative Performance (SSAOP) tool in determining the operative competence of core surgical trainees in Ireland. Methods SSAOP scores from April 2016 - February 2021 were analysed. Reliability analyses for assessment of laparoscopic appendicectomy were compared to those across all submitted procedural assessments. Generalizability and decision studies determined the number of assessments and observers needed to achieve a reliability coefficient (G) of ≥0.7 and ≥0.8 (appropriate for low- and high-stakes assessment respectively). Results 2,294 SSAOPs were analysed; 85 were completed for laparoscopic appendicectomy. G ≥0.70 is achieved using a single assessor observing a minimum of 3 laparoscopic appendicectomy cases, though G ≥0.70 cannot be achieved for assessments across a wider group of procedures without large numbers of assessors and cases. G ≥0.80 can be achieved with a minimum of two random assessors each observing 3 cases using the Overall Performance rating, or by two assessors and 6 assessments using the ‘Total Checklist’ score. Reliable assessment of a trainee's skill across all procedures, regardless of sub-specialty, could only be achieved using 89 cases and 7 assessors using the Overall Performance rater, or 67 cases and 9 assessors using the Total Checklist. Conclusion Operative competence should be assessed on a procedure-specific basis. Assessing overall competence across procedures is not feasible in practice. Trainers and trainees should focus on repeated assessments observing index procedures suitable for a given trainee's stage of training.

SP7.5 Psychomotor assessments of fundamental ability are associated with the future operative performance of surgical trainees

Abstract Introduction Assessments of visuospatial, psychomotor and perceptual ability correlate with simulated operative performance. This study investigates the association between fundamental technical ability and future operative performance as measured through both in-theatre and simulation-based assessments. Methods Core surgical trainees in the Republic of Ireland recruited from 2016–2019 participated in validated assessments of fundamental technical ability; Pictorial Surface Orientation (PicSOr) testing of perceptual ability, ‘paper-based’ visuospatial aptitude assessments, and psychomotor testing using a grooved pegboard. Operative performance was assessed using the in-theatre Supervised Structured Assessment of Operative Performance (SSAOP) tool, and Operative Surgical Skill (OSS) assessments (multi-station simulation-based assessments) performed over a 2-year core training period. SSAOP assessments were scored using a 15-point checklist and a global 5-point Operative Performance score. Univariate (Pearson) correlations and multiple linear regression were used to explore the association between fundamental ability and operative performance, controlled for both operative experience and centile scores from the trainee's undergraduate medical degree. Results Aggregated fundamental ability scores strongly correlated with performance in all submitted SSAOP assessments using the Total Checklist score (B = 0.75, t(168) = 3.17, p = 0.002) and weakly correlated with Overall Performance scores (B = 0.04, t(168) = 3.16, p = 0.002), independent of operative experience and centile scores. Fundamental ability scores were also predictive of OSS assessment scores on multivariate analysis (B = 0.219, t(168) = 2.22, p = 0.03). Conclusion Fundamental technical ability is predictive of future performance in both in-theatre workplace-based assessments of operative skill and simulation-based assessments of operative performance.

Baseline Assessments of Psychomotor Aptitude Are Associated With the Future Operative Performance of Surgical Trainees: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

This study sought to investigate the association between validated psychomotor ability tests and future in-theater and simulated operative performance. Assessments of visuospatial ability, perceptual ability, and manual dexterity correlate with simulated operative performance. Data showing the predictive value of such assessments in relation to future performance in the workplace is lacking. Core surgical residents in Ireland recruited from 2016 to 2019 participated in assessments of baseline perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor ability; Pictorial Surface Orientation (PicSOr) testing, digital visuospatial ability testing, and manual dexterity testing. Operative performance was prospectively assessed using the in-theater Supervised Structured Assessment of Operative Performance (SSAOP) tool, and simulation-based Operative Surgical Skill (OSS) assessments performed over a 2-year core training period. SSAOP assessments were scored using a 15-point checklist and a global 5-point operative performance score. OSS assessments were scored using procedure-specific checklists. Univariate correlations and multiple linear regression analyses were used to explore the association between fundamental ability measures and operative performance. A total of 242 residents completed baseline psychomotor ability assessments. Aggregated fundamental ability scores were associated with performance in submitted workplace-based SSAOP assessments using the Total Checklist score ( P =0.002) and Overall Performance scores ( P =0.002), independent of operative experience, and undergraduate centile scores. Aggregated ability scores were also positively associated with simulation-based OSS assessment scores on multivariable analysis ( P =0.03). This study indicates that visuospatial, psychomotor, and perceptual ability testing scores are associated with the future operative performance of surgical residents.

Simulation-based education improves military trainees' skill performance and self-confidence in tourniquet placement: A randomized controlled trial.

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) is the standard of care for stabilization and treatment of military trauma patients. The Department of Defense has mandated that all service members receive role-based TCCC training and certification. Simulation education can increase procedural skills by providing opportunities for deliberate practice in safe, controlled environments. We developed and evaluated the effectiveness of a simulation-based TCCC training intervention to improve participants' skill performance and self-confidence in tourniquet placement. This study was a single-blinded, randomized trial with waitlist controls. Army Reserve Officers Training Corp cadets from a single training battalion comprised the study population. After randomization and baseline assessment of all participants, group A alone received focused, simulation-based TCCC tourniquet application training. Three months later, all participants underwent repeat testing, and after crossover, the waitlist group B received the same intervention. Two months later, all cadets underwent a third/final assessment. The primary outcome was tourniquet placement proficiency assessed by total score achieved on a standardized eight-item skill checklist. A secondary outcome was self-confidence in tourniquet application skill as judged by participants' Likert scale ratings. Forty-three Army Reserve Officers Training Corp cadets completed the study protocol. Participants in both group A (n = 25) and group B (n = 18) demonstrated significantly higher performance from baseline to final assessment at 5 months and 2 months, respectively, following the intervention. Mean total checklist score of the entire study cohort increased significantly from 5.53 (SD = 2.00) at baseline to 7.56 (SD = 1.08) at time 3, a gain of 36.7% ( p < 0.001). Both groups rated their self-confidence in tourniquet placement significantly higher following the training. A simulation-based TCCC curriculum resulted in significant, consistent, and sustained improvement in participants' skill proficiency and self-confidence in tourniquet placement. Participants maintained these gains 2 months to 5 months after initial training. Therapeutic/care management; Level II.

Factors Affecting Hospitalization and Length of Hospitalization of the Patients with Covid-19

Factors Affecting Hospitalization and Length of Hospitalization of the Patients with Covid-19

Translation and Psychometric Assessment of the Postoperative Handover Assessment Tool

PurposeThe objective of the present study was to translate and validate the Postoperative Handover Assessment Tool (PoHAT) in the Persian language. DesignThe study used a descriptive, mixed-method design. MethodsThe present descriptive, mixed-method study was conducted in 2018 at Shahid Rajaee Hospital and Shiraz Nursing and Midwifery School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Shiraz, Iran), to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PoHAT. The original version of PoHAT was translated into the Persian language and then back-translated for comparison. The face validity (qualitative), content validity (qualitative and quantitative), construct validity (experimental intervention method), and reliability (inter-rater reliability, internal consistency) of the Persian version of the PoHAT were assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 22. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. FindingsThe content validity ratio of all the 34 items of the Persian version of the PoHAT ranged between 0.66 and 1. The content validity index for all items was within the acceptable range (between 0.92 and 1). The result of construct validity, using the experimental intervention method, showed a significant difference between before and after intervention (P < .05). The correlation coefficient for inter-rater reliability of all subscales (information, tasks, teamwork) and the total checklist was 0.89, 0.80, 0.94, and 0.85, respectively; the coefficient was significant for all subscales (P < .001). ConclusionsThe validity and reliability of the 34-item Persian version of the PoHAT were confirmed. The application of the PoHAT to assess the process and quality of postoperative handover in Iran and other Persian-speaking countries is recommended.

Using Standardized Patients to Augment Communication Skills and Self-Efficacy in Caring for Transgender Youth.

To examine the impact of standardized patient encounters (SPEs) on gender-affirming communication skills and self-efficacy of pediatrics learners. Fourth-year medical students, pediatrics interns, psychiatry interns, and nurse practitioner trainees on 1-month adolescent medicine blocks completed a curriculum with e-learning activities that was expanded to include SPEs. Following e-learning, learners completed 2 SPEs featuring transgender adolescent cases. Faculty observers and standardized patients completed checklists focused on history-taking, counseling, and interpersonal communication, and provided learner feedback after each case. The curriculum was evaluated by comparing skills checklists scores from case 1 to case 2 via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Self-efficacy was assessed precurriculum (Assessment 1), post-e-learning (Assessment 2), and post-SPE (Assessment 3) using a previously developed instrument. Changes in self-efficacy scores were assessed via linear regression models with generalized estimating equations. Forty-three eligible learners participated in the study. The majority were pediatrics interns, and 5 learners had worked in a transgender clinic prior to the curriculum participation. Learners increased median total checklist scores between cases from 22 to 28 (P < .001) (maximum score of 34). Learners' overall self-efficacy scores improved by 3.4 (confidence interval [CI]: 2.9-3.9; P < .001) between Assessments 1 and 2 and by 1.5 (CI: 1.2-1.7; P < .001) from Assessment 2 to 3. Similar improvements in checklist scores and self-efficacy occurred within stratified learner types. The combination of SPEs with e-learning is effective at improving self-efficacy and gender-affirming communication skills for a multidisciplinary pediatrics learners. The comprehensive curriculum allowed learners inexperienced with transgender youth to apply knowledge and practice skills.

Medical Student Ultrasound-Guided Intravenous Catheter Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Overtraining in a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Setting.

Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) improves skill transfer to humans. However, limited data exist to support the practice of performing additional training attempts once mastery has been achieved. We explored whether implementing this concept in an SBML model improves skill transfer in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (USGPIV) catheter placement from simulator to humans. Forty-eight first- and second-year medical students underwent SBML for USGPIV placement to mastery standards on a simulator once to achieve minimum passing standard based on a 19-item checklist. Next, they completed either 0, 4, or 8 additional mastery level simulated performances in nonconsecutive order before attempting USGPIV placement on a human. An unplanned post hoc retention phase occurred 6 months later where participants' USGPIV skills were reassessed on a second human volunteer using the same checklist. In this sample, the success rate among the 3 training cohorts did not improve as the number of additional training sessions increased (exact P = 0.60) and were comparable among the 3 cohorts (exact P = 0.82). The overall checklist performance was also comparable among the 3 cohorts (exact P = 0.57). In an unplanned (small) sample of returning participants, the USGPIV retention rate exceeded 80% for those originally assigned to 4 or 8 sessions, whereas the retention rate fell less than 50% for those originally assigned to control. Among these returning participants, the overall success rate was 58% on the initial assessment and was 68% on retention. In this sample of novices, we were unable to show that up to 8 additional mastery level performances of USGPIV placement on a simulator following SBML training improve skill transfer for both USGPIV placement success and total checklist performance.

Knowledge levels among elderly people with Diabetes Mellitus concerning COVID-19: an educational intervention via a teleservice.

AimTo investigate knowledge levels concerning COVID-19 in elderly patients with T2DM.MethodsThis cross-sectional, quantitative, observational, and descriptive study was undertaken among elderly individuals with T2DM involved in a body balance rehabilitation program that had been suspended due to social isolation. The study participants comprised elderly individuals with T2DM, contactable using fixed or mobile telephones. Data concerning participants’ socioeconomic variables and knowledge of COVID-19 were collated, using a Brazil Ministry of Health guidelines checklist. Mann–Whitney and Spearman’s correlation tests were used to analyze their responses.ResultsOf 30 elderly participants, 76.7% were women and 63.3% were married. The average age was 69.96 ± 4.46 years. The most cited information medium was television (96.6%). Of a possible 24 correct responses on the checklist, the median correct response score was 7.5. No significant relationship was observed between the total checklist score and the variables studied.ConclusionElderly participants did not have in-depth knowledge concerning COVID-19, which suggests that their knowledge sources may be deficient or that their capacity to retain information was inadequate.

Assessment Scores of a Mock Objective Structured Clinical Examination Administered to 99 Anesthesiology Residents at 8 Institutions.

Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are used in a variety of high-stakes examinations. The primary goal of this study was to examine factors influencing the variability of assessment scores for mock OSCEs administered to senior anesthesiology residents. Using the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) OSCE Content Outline as a blueprint, scenarios were developed for 4 of the ABA skill types: (1) informed consent, (2) treatment options, (3) interpretation of echocardiograms, and (4) application of ultrasonography. Eight residency programs administered these 4 OSCEs to CA3 residents during a 1-day formative session. A global score and checklist items were used for scoring by faculty raters. We used a statistical framework called generalizability theory, or G-theory, to estimate the sources of variation (or facets), and to estimate the reliability (ie, reproducibility) of the OSCE performance scores. Reliability provides a metric on the consistency or reproducibility of learner performance as measured through the assessment. Of the 115 total eligible senior residents, 99 participated in the OSCE because the other residents were unavailable. Overall, residents correctly performed 84% (standard deviation [SD] 16%, range 38%-100%) of the 36 total checklist items for the 4 OSCEs. On global scoring, the pass rate for the informed consent station was 71%, for treatment options was 97%, for interpretation of echocardiograms was 66%, and for application of ultrasound was 72%. The estimate of reliability expressing the reproducibility of examinee rankings equaled 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.63), which is reasonable for normative assessments that aim to compare a resident's performance relative to other residents because over half of the observed variation in total scores is due to variation in examinee ability. Phi coefficient reliability of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.35-0.50) indicates that criterion-based judgments (eg, pass-fail status) cannot be made. Phi expresses the absolute consistency of a score and reflects how closely the assessment is likely to reproduce an examinee's final score. Overall, the greatest (14.6%) variance was due to the person by item by station interaction (3-way interaction) indicating that specific residents did well on some items but poorly on other items. The variance (11.2%) due to residency programs across case items was high suggesting moderate variability in performance from residents during the OSCEs among residency programs. Since many residency programs aim to develop their own mock OSCEs, this study provides evidence that it is possible for programs to create a meaningful mock OSCE experience that is statistically reliable for separating resident performance.

An assessment of Information disclosures by Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from India

&lt;p&gt;The information disclosed by the companies in their annual reports reveals much about company’s performance and prospects. Investors take the information as base for decision for investment. Under such circumstance, companies choose to disclose beyond what is mandatorily required. Theories like agency theory, capital need theory and signaling theory support the need of voluntary disclosure. This study is about investigating the extent of Voluntary disclosure in pharmaceutical sector of India which is 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; in World in terms of Volume of Trade.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective&lt;/strong&gt;: To investigate the extent of voluntary disclosure practices prevailing in pharma sector of India, for the year 2010-11 to 2017-18.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Significance of the study:&lt;/strong&gt; This study aims to explore the corporate aspect of pharmaceutical sector. Any growing avenue is a potential opportunity for investors looking for parking their money to get adequate returns. Thus, Indian Pharma sector has come up in flying colors as an avenue for investors to place their money owing to its 100% FDI . Investors have been looking for more and more information from this sector to ensure the safety of funds. Thus the extent of disclosures is worth studying to place a suggestion for the policymakers to introduce the changes in the present set of disclosure practices in pharmaceutical sector.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Methodology&lt;/strong&gt;: To understand the extent of voluntary disclosure, a disclosure checklist is constructed and descriptive statistics are carved out to reach the results. The checklist consists of 55 items which are not mandatory by law. The checklist is based on dichotomous scale of ‘1’ and ‘0’ representing presence and absence of the checklist item respectively. The cross sectional analysis is carried out to investigate the year wise and company wise disclosure for eight years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&lt;/strong&gt; Though the study observes an increasing trends in the disclosure scores, but the findings are alarming to state that the highest score attained by any company throughout the period of 8 years was 37 (out of 55) not even meeting 80% of the total checklist score. This shows that pharmaceutical sector is not so friendly at disclosures. The probable reasons for such startling results are discussed in the study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

PTSD Symptoms Experienced and Coping Tactics Used by Crime Scene Investigators in the United States.

Few investigations have assessed the prevalence of posttraumatic stress experiences among Crime Scene Investigators (CSIs). We recruited a nationwide sample of 225 CSIs to complete online questionnaires assessing PTSD symptoms, use of specific coping tactics, perceived social support, trait resilience, and demographics. Seven symptoms had been experienced by at least 50% of participants during the previous month, and 9.3% had total checklist scores suggestive of PTSD. A significant regression analysis revealed that higher PTSD scores were associated with drinking alcohol more frequently to deal with stress, admitting more frequently one could not deal with stress and not trying to do so, lower social support, getting angry and letting emotions out more frequently, lower resilience, and finding comfort in one's religious beliefs. Given the proportions of CSIs that experience exposure-related stress, more should be done to mitigate the prevalence and severity of these symptoms.

The Effect of an Electronic Dynamic Cognitive Aid Versus a Static Cognitive Aid on the Management of a Simulated Crisis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a dynamic electronic cognitive aid with embedded clinical decision support (dCA) versus a static cognitive aid (sCA) tool. Anesthesia residents in clinical anesthesia years 2 and 3 were recruited to participate. Each subject was randomized to one of two groups and performed an identical simulated clinical scenario. The primary outcome was task checklist performance with a secondary outcome of performance using the Anesthesia Non-technical skills (ANTS) scoring system. 34 residents were recruited to participate in the study. 19 residents were randomized to the sCA group and 15 to the dCA group. Overall inter-rater agreement for total checklist, malignant hyperthermia, hyperkalemia and ventricular fibrillation was 98.9%, 97.8%, 99.5% and 99.5% respectively with similar Kappa coefficient. Inter-rater agreement for ANTS partial ratings, however, was only 53.5% with a similar Kappa of 0.15. Mean performance was statistically higher in the dCA group versus the sCA group for total check list performance (15.70 ± 1.93 vs 12.95 ± 2.16, p < 0.0001). The difference in performance between dCA and sCA is most notable in dose-dependent related checklist items (4.60 ± 1.3 vs 1.89 ± 1.23, p < 0.0001), while the performance score for dose-independent checklist items was similar between the two groups (p = 0.8908). ANTS ratings did not differ between groups. In conclusion, we evaluated the use of a sCA versus a dCA with embedded decision support in a simulated environment. The dCA group was found to perform more checklist items correctly.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov study #: NCT02440607.