Total Body Skin Exams Research Articles

Keratinocyte Carcinoma: Canadian Landscape and an Evidence-based Approach to Follow-up

Dermatologists play a vital role in the early detection, prevention and effective management of skin cancer in patients with a prior history of the disease. Regular monitoring and timely interventions greatly enhance the overall prognosis and quality of life for patients with skin cancer. Dermatologists possess the requisite expertise to accurately diagnose and oversee the management of cutaneous skin cancers. Skin cancer screening via total body skin exam (TBSE) is often considered one of the safest, easiest, and most cost-effective tests in medicine. Despite dermatologists’ ability to offer such invaluable care for this patient population, offering routine skin checks for all patients with a prior history of skin cancer becomes exceptionally challenging given the high demand for dermatology care across Canada. It is important for dermatologists to maximize the efficiency of care during TBSEs by adhering to evidence-based guidelines when determining the frequency and duration of follow-up. These guidelines also provide a solid foundation for discussions with patients regarding the rationale for discharge back to their primary care provider.

Perceptions of Sun Protection, Skin Tone, Colorism, and Dermatologic Care Among South Asians in the USA.

South Asians (SAs) are among the fastest growing populations in the USA. Colorism - the system of inequality that views lighter skin as more advantageous in society - is prevalent in SA culture. This study evaluates motivations of sun protection use, attitudes of colorism, and skin lightening (SL) practices among SA Americans. Two-hundred-four participants recruited from online forums and ResearchMatch completed a questionnaire. Over half (111/204) reported use of sunscreen, of which 39.6% (44/111) reported daily or frequent use. Nearly half of respondents (98/204) believed that they are not at risk for skin cancer, with 37.7% (77/204) reporting minimal knowledge of skin cancers and only 4.9% (10/204) receiving a total body skin exam. One-third (65/204) reported being more concerned about prevention of tanning than skin cancer. In total, 38.2% (78/204) of respondents reported use of SL products, of which 33.3% (26/78) reported hydroquinone-based products and 26.9% (21/78) were unaware of the ingredients in their SL product. Only 16.7% (13/78) consulted a medical professional before using SL products. While many agreed that SA culture places high importance on light skin with regards to beauty standards (82.3%, 168/204), less noted that lighter skin is more beautiful (37.0%, 74/204). SL users more strongly agreed with colorism attitudes than non-users. Limitations include a small sample size with younger participants. Dermatologists must be mindful of the cultural motivations for skin tone preferences, sun protection habits, and SL behaviors and provide culturally relevant education on sunscreen, skin cancer, and risks of SL for the SA community.

Characterizing differences inoutpatient dermatologic care utilizationamong disaggregated Asian American subgroups.

Despite having significantly higher rates of atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and pigmentary disorders compared to White patients, studies suggest that Asian Americans are underrepresented in outpatient dermatology clinics. In this study, we utilize the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and prioritize disaggregated analyses to evaluate differences between the most populous Asian American subgroups (Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and "Other") in utilization of outpatient dermatologic care. We utilized multivariable logistic regression to compare outpatient dermatologic care use between each Asian American subgroup and Non-Hispanic Whites. Out of 96,559 adults, our study included 5264 self-identified Asian American and 91,295 non-Hispanic White adults. Most Asian participants were female, had health insurance, and had incomes > 2 times above the federal poverty line. We found that, compared to 21.4% for NH whites, lifetime prevalence of total body skin exam was highest among Filipino Americans (12.3%) and lowest among Indian Americans (7%). Additionally, all Asian American subgroups had a significantly lower odd than NH Whites of ever having a total body skin exam, with Indian Americans having the lowest odds. While thebenefitofTBSEs inIndian Americansis unclear,it is possible that differing cultural perceptions about dermatologic needs,barriers to care,orimmigration status may be contributing tothe observed difference. Furthermore, the Indian diaspora encapsulates a range of skin tones, risk factors, and behaviors that maydifferentiallyinfluencedermatologic disease risk,similar totrends identified among Hispanic patients (Trepanowski et al. in J Am Acad Dermatol 88:1206-1209, 2023). Additional researchutilizingthe sevennational databasesthat have been identifiedasprovidingdisaggregated Asian racial information (Kamal et al. in J Am Acad Dermatol, 2023)maybe useful to furtherilluminate avenues for intervention.

Increasing the Use of Total Body Skin Exam in Medicare Beneficiaries: Is This a Blessing or a Curse?

Increasing the Use of Total Body Skin Exam in Medicare Beneficiaries: Is This a Blessing or a Curse?

Multiple Primary Melanoma: A Five-Year Prospective Single-Center Follow-Up Study of Two MC1R R/R Genotype Carriers.

Multiple primary melanoma (MPM) is a diagnostic challenge even with ancillary imaging technologies available to dermatologists. In selected patients' phenotypes, the use of imaging approaches can help better understand lesion characteristics, and aid in early diagnosis and management. Under a 5-year prospective single-center follow-up, 58 s primary melanomas (SPMs) were diagnosed in two first-degree relatives, with fair skin color, red hair, green eyes, and personal history of one previous melanoma each. Patients' behavior and descriptive demographic data were collected from medical records. The information on the first two primary melanomas (PMs) were retrieved from pathology reports. The characteristics of 60 melanomas were collected from medical records, video dermoscopy software, and pathology reports. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) was performed prior to excision of 22 randomly selected melanomas. From February 2018 to May 2023, two patients underwent a pooled total of 214 excisional biopsies of suspect lesions, resulting in a combined benign versus malignant treatment ratio (NNT) of 2.0:1.0. The number of moles excised for each melanoma diagnosed (NNE) was 1.7:1.0 and 6.9:1.0 for the female and male patient respectively. The in-situ melanoma/invasive melanoma ratio (IIR) demonstrated a higher proportion of in-situ melanomas for both patients. From June 2018 to May 2023, a total of 58 SPMs were detected by the combination of total body skin exam (TBSE), total body skin photography (TBSP), digital dermoscopy (DD), and sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) via comparative approach. The younger patient had her PM one month prior to the second and third cutaneous melanomas (CMs), characterizing a case of synchronous primary CM. The male older relative had a total of 7 nonsynchronous melanomas. This CM cohort is composed of 83.3% in-situ melanoma and 16.7% invasive melanoma. Both patients had a higher percentage of SPM with clinical nevus-like morphology (84.5%), global dermoscopic pattern of asymmetric multiple component (60.3%) and located on the lower limbs (46.6%). When RCM was performed prior to excision, 81% of SPM had features suggestive of malignancy. As well, invasive melanomas were more frequent in the lower limbs (40%). In the multivariate model, for the two high-risk patients studied, the chance of a not associated with nevus ("de novo") invasive SPM diagnosis is 25 times greater than the chance of a diagnosis of a nevus-associated invasive SPM.

DS05 Future guidelines should consider time needed to treat in clinics

Abstract The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) published comprehensive guidelines on the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) in 2021, outlining 46 recommendations over 32 pages. These recommendations include a full skin check or total body skin exam (TBSE) for the detection of new malignancies in this at-risk group. We present our experience in implementing this new guidance and the importance of considering the estimated clinician time needed to improve the outcome for one person in the target population (i.e. TNTNNT) when formulating new guidelines (Johansson M, Guyatt G, Montori V. Guidelines should consider clinicians’ time needed to treat. BMJ 2023; 380:e072953). A prospective audit of a skin cancer clinic found that the average consultation time for a patient with a newly diagnosed cSCC was 31 min (range 22–60 min). Follow-up appointments are routinely scheduled at 15 min; therefore, on average, a further 16 min is required to implement the new guidelines for each patient correctly. Recent evidence shows that one new SCC can be diagnosed per 57 TBSEs performed (Harding T, Seyffert J, Maner B et al. Exploring the clinical efficacy of the TBSE. J Clin Oncol 2020. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.10078). Therefore, the approximate TNTNNT is 912 min (16 min × 57) or 15.2 h of clinical examination to detect one extra cSCC. This equates to nearly four consultant clinics (one clinic represents 4 h of activity) to detect an additional SCC in a patient group that is already attending for frequent review. There is a paucity of evidence to support the hypothesis that screening and removal of these lesions leads to reduced morbidity and mortality as compared with routine presentation and subsequent management. This lack of evidence is reflected in the US Preventive Services Task Force guidance on TBSE for skin cancer screening, where they provide ‘no recommendation’. Implementing the BAD guidelines has an effect on clinic times and generates an increased surgical caseload. We recommend that future guideline committees should indicate how much extra time in clinic would be required per patient to implement their advice adequately. The TNTNNT is one method to consider the clinical impact of such guidance.

Recommendations From a Chinese-Language Survey of Knowledge and Prevention of Skin Cancer Among Chinese Populations Internationally: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.

There is a paucity of studies assessing awareness and prevention of skin cancer among Chinese populations. The aim of the study is to compare attitudes and practices regarding skin cancer risks and prevention between Chinese Asian and North American Chinese populations and between Fitzpatrick scores. A cross-sectional, internet-based, 74-question survey in Chinese was conducted focusing on Han Chinese participants internationally. The survey included Likert-type scales and multiple-choice questions. All participants were required to read Chinese and self-identify as being 18 years or older and Chinese by ethnicity, nationality, or descent. Participants were recruited on the internet over a 6-month period from July 2017 through January 2018 via advertisements in Chinese on popular social media platforms: WeChat, QQ, Weibo, Facebook, and Twitter. Of the 113 completed responses collected (participation rate of 65.7%), 95 (84.1%) were ethnically Han Chinese, of which 93 (96.9%) were born in China and 59 (62.1%) were female. The mean age of these 95 participants was 35.8 (SD 13.3) years; 72 (75.8%) participants were born after 1975. Few but more North American Chinese reported that Chinese Asian populations received annual skin checks (4/30, 4.2% vs 0/65, 0%; P=.009) and believed that their clinician provided adequate sun safety education (13/30, 43.3% vs 15/65, 23.1%; P=.04). Participants with higher Fitzpatrick scores less frequently received sun safety education from a clinician (4/34, 11.8% vs 22/61, 36.1%; P=.02). More participants with lower Fitzpatrick scores used sunscreen (41/61, 67.2% vs 16/34, 47.1%; P=.05), but alternative sun protection use rates are similar across groups. Cultural differences and Fitzpatrick scores can affect knowledge and practices with respect to sun protection and skin cancer among social media-using Chinese Asian and North American Chinese communities based on respondent demographics. Most participants in all groups understood that people of color have some risk of skin cancer, but >30% of all groups across regions and Fitzpatrick scores are unaware of current skin protection recommendations, receive insufficient sun safety education, and do not use sunscreen. Outreach efforts may begin broadly with concerted public and private efforts to train and fund dermatologists to perform annual total body skin exams and provide more patient education. They should spark community interest through mass media and empower Chinese people to perform self-examinations and recognize risks and risk mitigation methods.

Comparison of Patient and Provider Practices between Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplantation Programs for Patient Education on Increased Risk of Skin Cancer

Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation are at risk for skin cancer owing to dampened tumor surveillance. As long-term immunotherapy is necessary to prevent graft rejection, transplantation providers and recipients are expected to perform regular surveillance for the development of suspicious lesions, and recipients are encouraged to practice preventative sun safe behaviors. No consensus exists regarding the timing of full body skin exams, and despite the well-established risk, patient education is not always prioritized. We investigated whether differences exist between bone marrow transplant (BMT) and organ transplant (OT) recipients and their providers regarding prevention and screening. We distributed surveys to adult and pediatric BMT and OT recipients, as well as their providers, at a single academic institution. Results were evaluated using the chi-square test. The survey results show that most BMT recipients (69%) and OT recipients (77%) were aware of their increased risk for skin cancer, but despite this knowledge, only 13% of patients overall reported using sunscreen, 29% reported reapplying sunscreen, and 48% reported wearing sun protective clothing. Most OT recipients (63%) reported never having a total body skin exam, whereas only 34% BMT recipients reported having a total body skin exam every 6 months (P=.006). BMT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 6 or 12 months (44.4% each), and OT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 12 months (58.3%). Only 11.1% of BMT providers and 8.3% of OT providers reported performing a total body skin exam at each visit. Despite results indicating widespread patient knowledge of skin cancer risk, most patients do not practice adequate prevention. Inclusion of a transplantation dermatologist in the care team or use of risk stratification tools by providers may help streamline timely referrals to Dermatology.

Total body skin exams: the role of gynecology and dermatology-a cross-sectional study.

The literature demonstrates practice gaps in performance of the genital skin examination. To further elucidate and understand these practice gaps, we surveyed dermatologist and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) attending and resident physicians. Analysis of 73 dermatology survey responses revealed a lack of satisfaction with training received in examination of the female genitalia. Moreover, examination of 69 OB/GYN survey responses showed a lack of satisfaction with residency training received to identify high risk skin lesions. Interestingly, only 52.2% of OB/GYN respondents inspect perianal skin during pelvic region examinations. Our results highlight the need to improve residency training through standardization of breast/genitalia skin examinations during both dermatology and OB/GYN residency and for increased collaboration between specialties.

Using Implementation Science to Understand Teledermatology Implementation Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study.

BackgroundImplementation science has been recognized for its potential to improve the integration of evidence-based practices into routine dermatologic care. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in rapid teledermatology implementation worldwide. Although several studies have highlighted patient and care provider satisfaction with teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic, less is known about the implementation process.ObjectiveOur goal was to use validated tools from implementation science to develop a deeper understanding of the implementation of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our primary aims were to describe (1) the acceptability and feasibility of the implementation of teledermatology and (2) organizational readiness for the implementation of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also sought to offer an example of how implementation science can be used in dermatologic research.MethodsAn anonymous, web-based survey was distributed to Association of Professors of Dermatology members. It focused on (1) the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of teledermatology and (2) organizational readiness for implementing teledermatology. It incorporated subscales from the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment—a validated measure of organizational characteristics that predict implementation success.ResultsOf the 518 dermatologists emailed, 35 (7%) responded, and all implemented or scaled up teledermatology during the pandemic. Of the 11 care providers with the highest level of organizational readiness, 11 (100%) said that they plan to continue using teledermatology after the pandemic. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they had sufficient training (24/35, 69%), financial resources (20/35, 57%), and facilities (20/35, 57%). However, of the 35 respondents, only 15 (43%) agreed or strongly agreed that they had adequate staffing support. Most respondents considered the most acceptable teledermatology modality to be synchronous audio and video visits with supplemental stored digital photos (23/35, 66%) and considered the least acceptable modality to be telephone visits without stored digital photos (6/35, 17%). Overall, most respondents thought that the implementation of synchronous audio and video with stored digital photos (31/35, 89%) and telephone visits with stored digital photos (31/35, 89%) were the most feasible. When asked about types of visits that were acceptable for synchronous video/audio visits (with stored digital photos), 18 of the 31 respondents (58%) said “new patients,” 27 (87%) said “existing patients,” 19 (61%) said “medication monitoring,” 3 (10%) said “total body skin exams,” and 22 (71%) said “lesions of concern.”ConclusionsThis study serves as an introduction to how implementation science research methods can be used to understand the implementation of novel technologies in dermatology. Our work builds upon prior studies by further characterizing the acceptability and feasibility of different teledermatology modalities. Our study may suggest initial insights on how dermatology practices and health care systems can support dermatologists in successfully incorporating teledermatology after the pandemic.

Exploring the clinical efficacy of the total body skin exam.

10078 Background: The clinical efficacy of the total body skin exam has long been the subject of debate. A 2016 report by the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) found the current body of evidence was “insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in [asymptomatic] adults.’’ However, the USPSTF based its recommendations on studies evaluating mainly the ability of primary care physicians to diagnose melanoma through total body skin exams (TBSE). This study seeks to address this insufficiency in the current literature by exploring the clinical efficacy of the dermatology provider performed TBSEs as a screening tool with respect to the detection of malignant melanoma (MM), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Methods: A search was performed within the electronic medical record of a large multi-state dermatology group practice for all instances of new and established patient office visits occurring from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019. Per practice policy, it is denoted whether each office visit includes a TBSE or partial skin exam (PSE). The number of MM, SCC, and BCC diagnoses made within the context of each class of skin exam was analyzed. Results: Of the 930,706 office visits analyzed, 438,027 TBSEs and 492,679 PSEs were performed. For each of the three types of skin cancer surveyed, the number of cancers diagnosed in the context of a TBSE was significantly greater than the number diagnosed in the context of a PSE. One MM was diagnosed per 161.0 TBSEs and 371.3 PSEs ( Χ2 ( df = 1, N = 930706) = 662, p < 0.001). One SCC was diagnosed per 56.7 TBSEs and 108.4 PSEs ( Χ2 ( df = 1, N = 930706) = 1258.5, p < 0.001). One BCC was diagnosed per 10.2 TBSEs and 17.8 PSEs ( Χ2 ( df = 1, N = 930706) = 5884, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Skin cancer is detected at significantly higher rates in TBSEs than PSEs. The finding that one MM is detected in 161 TBSEs may be compared to one cervical cancer is detected in 3,776 Pap smears. Thus, a TBSE is 23.5 times more likely to identify a MM than a Pap smear is to identify a cervical cancer. This trend holds even when adjusted for prevalence. Further analysis will allow for the comparison of exam types with respect to patient age, staging, lesion size, and Breslow depth at time of cancer diagnosis. This continued analysis will allow for a more detailed risk benefit-analysis and insight into the clinical efficacy of the TBSE.

The physical examination: a survey of patient preferences and expectations during primary care visits

ABSTRACTBackground: Little is known about patient preference regarding the physical exam in non-urgent primary care settings.Objective: To determine the differences between a patient’s expectations of the physical exam and the actual components of the physical examination performed during a non-urgent visit.Design: A total of 452 surveys administered in the waiting room of a VA primary care clinic in West Haven, CT.Key results: The response rate was 91.6% (n = 414). For 15 of 16 maneuvers on the survey, more respondents believed a reasonable provider should conduct it than received it at their annual physical exam; for 7 of them (breast, axillary, rectal, pelvic, total body skin exam, electrocardiogram, and stress test), over twice as many respondents believed they should be done than received them. There was an association between a patient’s perception of their primary care provider and the number of maneuvers recalled at their annual exam (P < 0.001), and a gap in the number of maneuvers expected from a reasonable provider by nonwhite and white patients (P < 0.001).Limitations: Convenience sample, response bias (healthy patients are more likely to respond) and recall bias.Conclusion: Patient perception of their primary care provider is strongly associated with the number of maneuvers recalled during an annual physical. Furthermore, the number of maneuvers expected by a patient is influenced by race, with nonwhite patients desiring more. This suggests the need for further research on the role of race in the expectations of healthcare providers.

Optimizing the total-body skin exam: An observational cohort study

Total-body skin examinations (TBSEs) are commonly performed in clinical practice. There is limited research on best practices for performing a TBSE. To optimize the TBSE. We performed an observational cohort study by video recording 5 dermatology faculty and 5 residents conducting their regular TBSE on both a healthy male and female patient. Examination time, physician movements, patient movements, sequence of body parts examined, and body parts missed were analyzed by using an analytic hierarchy process matrix. Differences were evaluated by a t test of unequal variance. P values<.05 were deemed significant. We identified an optimal format for conducting a TBSE that is efficient and accurate. This study was conducted with only standard healthy examiners and patients, rather than individuals with a variety of physical or mental disabilities. The structure of the study was not hypothesis driven, and we assumed that the engineers observing the physicians performing the examination would identify the most optimal TBSE. Our results indicate that a standardized process of performing a TBSE minimizes the chance of missing a body area. This could also have implications on teaching a standardized TBSE to medical students, residents, and physicians.

Patient expectations and preferences for total body skin exams

Patient expectations and preferences for total body skin exams

Opportunities for Skin Cancer Prevention Education among Individuals Attending a Community Skin Cancer Screening in a High-Risk Catchment Area.

Despite the highly preventable nature of skin cancer, it remains the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer in the United States. Recommendations for a complete skin cancer prevention regimen include engaging in photoprotection (e.g., sunscreen use), avoiding skin cancer risk behaviors (e.g., tanning), and receiving total body skin exams from a health care provider. The current study examined reported engagement in these behaviors among participants attending a community skin cancer screening (N = 319) in a high-risk catchment area to assess the need for increased health education on skin cancer prevention. Participants' responses indicate a history of suboptimal avoidance of skin cancer risk behaviors. Over half of participants (52%) reported four or more blistering sunburns before age 20, and 46% reported indoor tanning at least one during their lifetime. There is a need among this population for education regarding a complete skin cancer prevention regimen, which could improve adherence to photoprotection and avoidance of skin cancer risk behaviors, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality due to skin cancer.

Practical management of the adverse effects of Hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy for basal cell carcinoma

Practical management of the adverse effects of Hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy for basal cell carcinoma

Total body skin exams (TBSEs): Saving lives or wasting time?

Total body skin exams (TBSEs): Saving lives or wasting time?

Skin cancer screening in the medically underserved population: A unique opportunity for APNs to make a difference.

To implement and evaluate the feasibility of an annual skin cancer screening program for the medically underserved at a free clinic in Marion, Indiana. Clinical initiative with descriptive analysis of results. IRB approval was obtained and the project was found to be exempted. The participation rate of 65% supported the feasibility of the skin screening program in a free clinic. The skin screening program allowed for detection of 17 worrisome lesions and all of these patients were referred to either the small procedure clinic, general surgeon, or dermatologist for definitive treatment. The project affirmed that clients in this setting are interested in total body skin exams and will participate in the screening program. Furthermore, there were a significant number of worrisome lesions discovered, which underscores the importance of this screening exam and the need for healthcare providers to either perform or refer patients for skin cancer screening on a regular basis. This area of screening is a unique opportunity for advanced practice nurses to make a difference in the medically underserved population who often lack skin cancer screening.

Psychosocial needs and communication as main early determinants of quality of life in women with non-metastatic breast cancer

Cancer survivors are more vulnerable to future cancers than individuals without cancer. As such, it is important to understand whether survivors are engaging in cancer screenings.The screening practices reported in response to the 2000 Health Interview Survey of 2151 individuals with cancer were examined and compared to those of 30,195 individuals without cancer.The proportion of cancer survivors obtaining screenings ranged from 21% to 77%. Compared to individuals without cancer, women with cancer were more likely to have had a mammogram (odds ratio [OR]=1.8, 95% CI=1.5–2.1), a clinical breast exam (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.9–2.5), and/or a Papanicolaou test (OR=1.3, 95% CI=1.1–1.5) in the recommended timeframe. Similarly, men with cancer were more likely than men without cancer to have had a prostate-specific antigen test performed (OR=2.5, 95% CI=2.0–3.0). All cancer survivors were more likely than individuals without a cancer diagnosis to have had a total body skin exam (OR=4.0, 95% CI=3.5–4.6), a fecal occult blood test (OR=1.4, 95% CI=1.2–1.6), and/or a colorectal exam (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.9–2.5). Similar results were obtained when individuals diagnosed with the cancer for which the screen was designed to detect were excluded.The results demonstrate that cancer survivors have higher screening rates than individuals without a cancer diagnosis. Despite this, the proportion of survivors obtaining screenings varies considerably by the type of screen. An understanding of the impact of cancer screening in cancer survivors, as well as the reasons for and against obtaining cancer screenings, is necessary.

Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors

Cancer survivors are more vulnerable to future cancers than individuals without cancer. As such, it is important to understand whether survivors are engaging in cancer screenings. The screening practices reported in response to the 2000 Health Interview Survey of 2151 individuals with cancer were examined and compared to those of 30,195 individuals without cancer. The proportion of cancer survivors obtaining screenings ranged from 21% to 77%. Compared to individuals without cancer, women with cancer were more likely to have had a mammogram (odds ratio [OR]=1.8, 95% CI=1.5-2.1), a clinical breast exam (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.9-2.5), and/or a Papanicolaou test (OR=1.3, 95% CI=1.1-1.5) in the recommended timeframe. Similarly, men with cancer were more likely than men without cancer to have had a prostate-specific antigen test performed (OR=2.5, 95% CI=2.0-3.0). All cancer survivors were more likely than individuals without a cancer diagnosis to have had a total body skin exam (OR=4.0, 95% CI=3.5-4.6), a fecal occult blood test (OR=1.4, 95% CI=1.2-1.6), and/or a colorectal exam (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.9-2.5). Similar results were obtained when individuals diagnosed with the cancer for which the screen was designed to detect were excluded. The results demonstrate that cancer survivors have higher screening rates than individuals without a cancer diagnosis. Despite this, the proportion of survivors obtaining screenings varies considerably by the type of screen. An understanding of the impact of cancer screening in cancer survivors, as well as the reasons for and against obtaining cancer screenings, is necessary.