This single center study compared the perioperative outcomes after total arterial multivessel revascularization through endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive surgery compared to a conventional sternotomy approach. In this retrospective, propensity score matched (PSM) cohort study, a total of 740 patients were analyzed (Endo-CAB, N = 92; Sternotomy N = 648). After PSM (1:2 ratio), 73 Endo-CAB and 137 sternotomy patients were compared with an equal number of distal anastomoses (Endo-CAB 2.3 vs Sternotomy 2.4 anastomoses per patient, p = 0.082). We used "textbook outcome" as a patient-orientated outcome measure, defined as the absence of 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative ischaemia, cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular events, wound infection, new onset arrhythmias, pneumonia, placement of chest drains and prolonged hospital stay (>7 days). Patients undergoing Endo-CAB had significantly more often a textbook outcome compared to the sternotomy group (78.1% vs 59.1%, p = 0.009). Endo-CAB patients had shorter hospital stay (4.0 vs 6.0 days, p < 0.001), less postoperative blood loss (360 vs 490 ml, p < 0.001) and a significant reduction of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (5.5% vs 17.5%, p = 0.015). Other postoperative outcomes were comparable for both groups. Total arterial Endo-CAB demonstrates excellent postoperative outcomes compared to a sternotomy approach for multivessel coronary artery disease. These findings provide a strong basis for further expanding the multivessel Endo-CAB program.
Read full abstract