Total Arch Debranching Research Articles

Time-resolved, Cardiac-gated Computed Tomography After Endovascular Ascending Aortic and Arch Repair

PurposeBetter time-resolved imaging of stent grafts in the ascending aorta and arch accounting for cardiac motion is necessary to understand device-related complications and endoleaks. This report describes dynamic time-resolved computed tomographic angiography (d-CTA) and its combination with electrocardiography gating (d-gated CTA) to image stent grafts in the ascending aorta and to characterize endoleaks more clearly. Descriptiond-CTA involves multiple scans acquired at different time points along the contrast enhancement curve. d-Gated CTA involves concomitant electrocardiography gating in a predefined cardiac phase minimizing motion-induced artifacts. EvaluationThis report illustrates the utility of d-CTA and d-gated CTA in 2 clinical cases. d-CTA demonstrated a type 1A endoleak in a patient with an aortic arch aneurysm treated with total arch debranching and a thoracic stent graft. d-gated CTA demonstrated a type 1A endoleak in a patient with an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm treated with aortic cuff placement. ConclusionsDynamic, cardiac-gated CTA enables time-resolved angiographic imaging of the ascending aorta and arch without any cardiac motion–related artifacts. Such advanced imaging techniques help with better characterization of endoleaks after stent graft deployment in the ascending aorta and arch.

Surgeon-modified endovascular grafts for treating ruptured arch aneurysm due to proximal endograft failure after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair combined with total debranching.

Generally, proximal endograft failure after total arch debranching and thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is one of the most difficult problems because re-sternotomy poses extremely high risks to patients with high surgical risk. Herein, we report an endovascular technique using surgeon-modified endovascular grafts for a patient with ruptured arch aneurysm caused by type Ia endoleak following total arch debranching and TEVAR.

Comparison between Arch Zones in Modified Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure for Complex Thoracic Aortic Diseases.

IntroductionThe aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes and follow-up of two different modifications facilitating surgical technique of frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for complex thoracic aortic diseases - zone 0 (fixation with total arch debranching) and zone 3 (fixation with islet-shape arch repair).MethodsFrom May 2012 to December 2018, data were collected from 139 patients who had been treated with FET procedure for complex thoracic aortic diseases. According to Ishimaru arch map, patients with proximal anastomotic site of hybrid graft at zone 0 and zone 3 were grouped as Group A (n=58, 41.7%) and Group B (n=81, 58.3%), respectively. Mean age of study population was 54.7±11.4 years, and 111 patients were male (79.9%).ResultsIn-hospital mortality was observed in 20 (14.4%) patients (n=12, acute type A aortic dissection, and n=4, previous aortic dissection surgery). There was no significant difference between both groups in terms of in-hospital mortality. Four patients from Group A and three patients from Group B had permanent neurological deficit (P=0.32). Three patients from both groups had transient spinal cord ischemia (P=0.334). Although mean total perfusion time was longer in Group A, duration of visceral ischemia, when compared with Group B, was shorter (P<0.001). Five-year survival rate was 82.8% in Group A and 81.5% in Group B (P=0.876).ConclusionFET procedure is a feasible repair technique in the treatment of complex aortic diseases, providing satisfactory early results. Because of its advantageous aspects, zone 0 fixation with debranching is the preferred technique in our clinic.

Modified Total Arch Debranching TEVAR with Aberrant Left Vertebral Artery.

Total arch debranching and thoracic endovascular repair of an aortic arch aneurysm with a left aberrant vertebral artery are rare procedures. A small artery is difficult to reconstruct and anastomose in a narrow thoracic space with a large aneurysm. We describe an 85-year-old man with a fusiform aortic arch aneurysm and left aberrant vertebral artery who underwent a hybrid procedure with reconstruction of the left aberrant vertebral artery at a surgical site in the neck. Postoperative computed tomography images confirmed exclusion of the aneurysm and patency of all arch vessels, including the left vertebral artery.

A 'through-and-through bowing technique' for antegrade thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with total arch debranching: a technical note and the initial results.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the deployment accuracy of a new 'through-and-through bowing technique' that involves the deployment of the stent graft with total arch debranching via median sternotomy. The migration distance, patients' demographic characteristics, operative values and the postoperative complications were examined retrospectively. From November 2012 to February 2013, 5 patients with an aortic arch aneurysm underwent total debranching and antegrade thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) (control group). Fifteen patients underwent placement using the 'through-and-through bowing technique' (bowing group) from March to November 2013. The device was deployed as follows. A stiff guide wire was passed through the debranching prosthesis via the femoral artery. By pushing the bilateral ends of the wire against the aortic arch, the device was located along the greater curvature and bent like a bow. The migration distance, defined as the distance between the pre- and post-deployment positions of the distal end of the stent graft, was measured using fluoroscopic images. There were no significant differences with respect to the patients' demographics or the operative variables between the two groups. The mean migration distance in the control group (9.4 ± 8.7 mm) was significantly longer than that in the bowing group (1.3 ± 1.5 mm). Although one major stroke occurred in the bowing group, there was no operative mortality in either group. The present paper demonstrated the precise positioning of a GORE TAG deployment using a 'through-and-through bowing technique' with total arch debranching.

Hybrid Strategy for Residual Arch and Thoracic Aortic Dissection following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair

Progressive dilatation of the false lumen in the arch and descending aorta has been encountered in one-third of survivors as a late sequelae following repair of ascending aortic dissection. Conventional treatment for the same requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is associated with high morbidity and mortality especially in the elderly cohort of patients. Herein we report a case of symptomatic progressive aneurysmal dilatation of residual arch and descending thoracic aortic dissection following repair of type A aortic dissection, successfully treated by total arch debranching and ascending aortic prosthesis to bicarotid and left subclavian bypass followed by staged retrograde aortic stent-graft deployment. This case report with relevant review of the literature highlights this clinical entity and the present evidence on its appropriate management strategies. Close surveillance is mandatory following surgical repair of type A aortic dissection and hybrid endovascular procedures seem to be the most dependable modality for salvage of patients detected to have progression of residual arch dissection.

Hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections

Hybrid interventions combining debranching of supra-aortic branch vessels with stent grafting of the aortic arch have become an attractive alternative to open repair for aortic arch pathologies. However, results in patients with dissections of the aortic arch remain unclear. We present our experience with hybrid aortic arch repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissections (TBAD) involving the distal part of the arch and aortic dissections distal to previous repair of the ascending aorta. Between January 2004 and December 2011, hybrid arch repair with supra-aortic branch revascularization involving at least one carotid artery bypass and simultaneous or staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed in 17 patients with a dissection involving the arch. Indications for hybrid repair were complicated acute TBAD in five patients (three impending ruptures, two malperfusion syndromes), chronic aneurysmal degeneration of a TBAD involving the aortic arch in eight, and chronic aneurysmal degeneration of a dissection distal to previous repair of the ascending aorta in four. Total arch debranching was performed in seven patients and cervical debranching in 10. Median follow-up was 13 months (range, 3-69 months). Overall 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality rates were 29% (5 of 17 patients). In-hospital death occurred in three of five patients (60%) with a complicated acute TBAD vs in two of 12 patients (17%) with chronic dissection (P=.12) and in one of seven (14%) with total arch debranching vs four of 10 patients (40%) with cervical debranching (P= .34). Two (12%) fatal strokes and four (24%) retrograde aortic dissections occurred. Retrograde aortic dissections tended to be more prevalent in patients with acute TBAD than in those with chronic dissection (3 of 5 vs 1 of 12; P= .053). No spinal cord ischemia was recorded. Two other patients died, at 8 and 26 months, after the operation of causes not related to the aortic dissection. Persistent perfusion in the aortic false lumen of the graft exclusion segment was identified in six patients, due to type III endoleak (n= 2) requiring additional endovascular intervention, type II endoleak (n= 3), or retrograde perfusion from distal fenestrations (n= 2). No proximal type I endoleak was identified. During follow-up, the dissected aorta distal to the stent graft remained stable in all surviving patients. In this series, mortality rates and incidence of retrograde aortic dissection were significant after hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections, especially in acute cases. These results are in contrast with previously published series including other aortic arch pathologies. They suggest that dissections of the aortic arch may represent a less favorable patient cohort.

Hybrid Repair of Aortic Arch Aneurysms in Same Session

Management of thoracic aorta aneurysms-especially the ones including aortic arch-is highly complicated. Isolated or nonisolated aortic arch aneurysms can be repaired by hybrid procedure especially in patients with comorbidities as well as by conventional open methods. Eleven patients who underwent total arch debranching and endovascular stent implantation on antegrade route in the same session between November 2006 and October 2009 were retrospectively evaluated using clinical and perioperative criteria. The mean age was 65 ± 6.2 and nine of the patients were male. Primary technical success rate was 100%. Mortality, stroke, or transient paraplegia/paraparesia was not seen during in-hospital follow-up. Average follow-up period was 36 ± 13 months and no late-term aortic pathology was seen. In only one of the patients, endovascular reintervention was required for type 1B endoleak. No mortality or neurological pathology was seen in long-term postoperative follow-up. Hybrid procedures could be performed safely with lower complication and higher success rates in the same session via antegrade route and zone 0 graft deployment for high-risk cases with isolated or nonisolated aortic arch aneurysms.

The challenge of associated intramural hematoma with endovascular repair for penetrating ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta

The presence of penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) of the descending thoracic aorta has been associated with a poor long-term prognosis. Although early results have suggested acceptable outcomes for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for PAU, few studies have described the late outcomes of this approach. From 1993 to 2009, 37 patients (43.2% male; mean age, 72 years) underwent TEVAR for PAU. Associated intramural hematoma was present in 19. Comorbidities included hypertension in 31, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 16, coronary artery disease in 22, and renal failure (mean preoperative creatinine, 1.4 mg/dL). Urgent or emergent indications were identified in 22 patients (59.5%), including presentation with rupture in 15 (40.5%). TEVAR was successfully performed in all patients. Arch repair was performed in 14 and total descending repair in 13. Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and total arch debranching in one patient electively presenting with an asymptomatic PAU. Early morbidity included stroke (5.4%), temporary paraplegia (5.4%), and need for dialysis (2.7%). In-hospital or 30-day mortality was seen in two patients (5.4%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, median survival was 89.8 months. Independent predictors of late mortality included urgent or emergent presentation (odds ratio, 14.7; P = .007). Actuarial freedom from TEVAR treatment failure (ie, need for open or endovascular aortic reintervention, aortic rupture, or aortic-related death) was 81.6% +/- 7.8% at 5 years. Analysis stratified by type of pathology (PAU vs PAU and intramural hematoma) showed no significant baseline differences in age, comorbidities, or extent of repair. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, however, presentation with PAU and intramural hematoma was associated with an increased risk for TEVAR treatment failure (P = .033). TEVAR can be safely accomplished for patients presenting with PAU. The presence of associated intramural hematoma may adversely affect the late outcomes of therapy, highlighting the need for careful planning, prudent balancing of the benefits of immediate vs delayed treatment of the fragile aortic wall, and the imperative nature of attentive follow-up in patients with PAU.

Hybrid Procedures for Complex Aortic Pathology: Initial Single Center Experience

To review experience at our center with the use of hybrid techniques for treating complex aneurysms of the thoracic aorta. The medical records of 41 patients (40 male) with complex aortic aneurysms affecting supra-aortic or visceral vessels who underwent hybrid procedures between 1998 and 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were in American Society of Anesthesiologists category IV. They were divided in two groups: group A comprised 32 patients with aneurysms involving the aortic arch and its branches (2 ascending aorta replacements, 1 arch repair, 13 carotid-carotid bypasses, 12 carotid-subclavian bypasses, and 4 with total arch debranching); and group B comprised 9 patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms and visceral vessel transpositions (4 partial and 5 total debranching). The mean age in group A was 69.3+/-1.3 (range, 62-73) years and in group B, 71.5+/-5.0 (range, 68-74) years. The mean hospital stay was 18+/-7.1 days (range, 5-35) and 12+/-8.2 days (range, 2-15) in groups A and B, respectively. Overall mortality was 12.2% (3.4% and 44.4% in groups A and B, respectively) and neurological morbidity was 3.4% and 11.1% in the two groups, respectively. The results obtained with hybrid treatment of the aortic arch area were comparable with those of conventional surgery. However, thoracoabdominal repair with complete revascularization of the visceral branches was associated with high mortality. Consequently, hybrid treatment is a valid option for high-risk patients who do not require complete revascularization in the visceral area.