Induction motor control for high dynamic performance industrial applications is often difficult due to parameters sensitivity and its non-linearity. Through independent manipulation of the flux and torque producing components, Field Oriented Control (FOC) methodologies have been used to improve dynamic performance, widen speed range, and torque/flux quality. Studies have shown that the Parallel Proportional Integral (PPI) compensation method produces responses of higher quality than the traditional cascaded Proportional Integral (PI) type though tuning gains for PPI controller is time consuming and inaccurate. In this research work, modeling of control strategy for Induction motor and tuning of four parameters (Ki, Ki1, Kp, Kp1) of PPI controller at the outer speed control loop have been conducted using GA and PSO algorithms. The speed and torque responses' performances of the proposed controller, PPI-PSO and PPI-GA, have been contrasted with each other. For simulation, SIMULINK and a programming environment of a MATLAB software were employed. The simulation result illustrated that PSO based tuning out performs the GA based tuning in terms of dynamic speed response, torque quality and disturbance rejection capability in the newly control mechanism. Although the speed trajectory tracking performance of both the controllers presented in this study is comparable, comparatively low dynamic performance was found for PPI-GA controller at both high and low speed tests inside the same search space. The PPI-PSO controller yields an optimal result having 0.270 % overshoot, a settling time of 8.185 s, and a rise time of 8.037 s in comparison with PPI-GA controller which exhibits overshoot of 0.640 %, a settling time of 9.596 s, and a rise time of 8.615 s with high-speed trajectory tracking test.
Read full abstract