Topiramate Plasma Research Articles

UGT1A polymorphism rs4148324 associated with topiramate plasma concentration to dose ratio in children with epilepsy.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between genetic polymorphisms and the concentration to dose ratio of topiramate in children with epilepsy. A cohort of 163 pediatric patients with epilepsy receiving topiramate therapy were enrolled. The ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was employed to measure the trough plasma concentration of topiramate at steady-state. These concentrations were normalized by dividing them by the ratio of total daily dose to body weight, yielding the concentration to dose ratio (CDR) of topiramate. MassArray system identified 30 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topiramate. The CDR values were logarithmic transformed (lnCDR) for normal distribution. The association between the identified genetic polymorphisms and lnCDR was assessed using the PLINK software, employing linear regression analysis with adjustments by epilepsy types, estimated glomerular filtration rate, alanine aminotransferase, valproic acid, phenobarbital, and oxcarbazepine. Variant rs4148324 (UGT1A1/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10, BETA=0.182, P = 0.010) was significantly associated with lnCDR of topiramate. Patients carrying the G allele exhibited higher normalized topiramate plasma concentrations. No other significant associations were found. In pediatric patients receiving topiramate therapy, rs4148324 was associated with normalized topiramate plasma concentration. Further studies are warranted to validate and confirm the findings.

Intravenous topiramate for seizure emergencies – First in human case report

Topiramate (TPM) is widely used in focal and generalized epilepsies. It is commercially available as tablets and sprinkles capsules for oral treatment. Previous studies comparing intravenous (IV) to oral TPM in healthy adults showed more rapid pharmacodynamic effects in cases of IV administration. Despite promising findings, no clinical application in humans followed. We present a case of a pregnant woman with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure in the third trimenon due to low TPM levels attributed to pregnancy followed by repeated prolonged absences. We applied a new meglumine-based solution (1%) of TPM (10 mg/ml) in two IV infusions of 200 mg each under EEG monitoring over a total duration of 1 hour. The infusion was well tolerated and led to a rapid increase in plasma TPM levels. A clinical as well as electroencephalographic improvement was documented within the first hours. To the best available knowledge, this is the first reported case where IV TPM was used therapeutically for seizure treatment in humans. It is also the first time that the new meglumine-based solution was used in a human with epilepsy. The advantages of IV route delivery and the solution’s quick preparation, high tolerability, and low toxicity make it ideal for use in many clinical settings and high-care patients. IV TPM seems to be a reasonable adjunctive option for adults with seizures, previously stabilized on oral TPM, who need rapid plasma concentration boosting. Although our experience was successful in using injectable TPM in seizure emergencies, randomized controlled clinical trials are required to make recommendations for the use of IV TPM on patients with epilepsy.This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022 in Salzburg, Austria.

Severity of Topiramate-Related Working Memory Impairment Is Modulated by Plasma Concentration and Working Memory Capacity.

Drug side effects that impair cognition can lead to diminished quality of life and discontinuation of therapy. Topiramate is an antiepileptic drug that elicits cognitive deficits more frequently than other antiepileptic drugs, impairing multiple cognitive domains including language, attention, and memory. Although up to 40% of individuals taking topiramate may experience cognitive deficits, we are currently unable to predict which individuals will be most severely affected before administration. The objective of this study was to show the contributions of plasma concentration and working memory capacity in determining the severity of an individual's topiramate-related cognitive impairment. Subjects were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study during which they received a single dose of either 100, 150, or 200 mg topiramate. Working memory function was assessed using a modified Sternberg working memory task with 3 memory loads administered 4 hours after dosing. After adjustment for differences in working memory capacity, each 1 μg/mL of topiramate plasma concentration was associated with a 3.6% decrease in accuracy for all memory loads. Placebo effects occurred as a function of working memory capacity, with individuals with high working memory capacity experiencing less severe placebo-related impairment compared with those with low working memory capacity. Our results demonstrate that severity of topiramate-related cognitive deficits occurs as a function of both drug exposure and baseline cognitive function. By identifying patient- and exposure-related characteristics that modulate the severity of cognitive side effects, topiramate dosing strategies may be individually tailored in the future to prevent unwanted cognitive impairment.

Brain’s compensatory response to drug-induced cognitive impairment

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Topiramate (TPM), a frequently prescribed antiseizure medication, can cause severe cognitive side-effects. Though these side-effects have been studied behaviorally, the underlying neural mechanisms are unknown. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of TPM’s impact on cognition, nine healthy volunteers completed three study sessions: a no-drug baseline session and two sessions during which they received either TPM or placebo. Electroencephalogram was recorded during each session while subjects performed a working-memory task with three memory-loads.Results: Comparing TPM with baseline we found the following results. (a) TPM administration led to declines in behavioral performance. (b) Fronto-central event-related potentials (ERP) elicited by probe stimuli, representing the primary task network activity, showed strong memory-load modulations at baseline, but the magnitude of these load-dependent modulations was significantly reduced during TPM session, suggesting drug-induced impairments of the primary task network. (c) ERP responses over bilateral fronto-temporal electrodes, which were not load sensitive at baseline, showed significant memory-load modulations after TPM administration, suggesting the drug-related recruitment of additional neural resources. (d) At fronto-central scalp sites, there was significant increase in response amplitude for low memory-load during TPM session compared to baseline, and the amplitude increase was dependent on TPM plasma concentration, suggesting that the primary task network became less efficient under TPM impact. (e) At bilateral fronto-temporal electrodes, there were no ERP differences when comparing low memory-load trials, but TPM administration led to an increase in ERP responses to high load, the magnitude of which was positively correlated with task performance, suggesting that the recruited neural resources were beneficial for task performance. Placebo–TPM comparison yielded similar effects albeit with generally reduced significance and effect sizes.Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that TPM impairs the primary task network by reducing its efficiency, which triggers compensatory recruitment of additional resources to maintain task performance.

Drug-resistant epilepsy and topiramate: Plasma concentration and frequency of epileptic seizures.

Topiramate (TPM) is a second-generation antiepileptic drug (AED), acting on drug-resistant epilepsy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the dose, use of other AEDs on TPM plasma concentration (Cp ), and frequency of epileptic seizures. A cross-sectional analytical study was developed with patients aged 18-60years, for diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy, using TPM in monotherapy or associated with other AEDs. The following variables were analyzed: age, frequency of epileptic seizures, pharmacotherapeutic regimen with its respective doses, adherence to medication treatment, and adverse events score. Thirty-seven patients were included, 83.8% of the patients presented Cp below the therapeutic range. Multiple linear regression estimated that the increase of 1.0mg/kg/d promoted an increase of 0.68μg/mL in TPMCp , while the use of inducers predicted a reduction of 2.97μg/mL (P<.001). Multiple Poisson regression predicts that an increase of 1.0μg/mL in TPMCp decreased the patient's chance of presenting seizures, and patients using AED inducers were about ten times more likely to present seizures than those who do not use (P<.001). In addition, for patients using AED inducers with Cp below the therapeutic range, the mean number of seizures per month was greater than those with Cp within the therapeutic range. The prescribed dose and the use of AED inducers influence Cp of TPM, likewise the low Cp of first-line AEDs and of the adjuvant in the treatment, TPM, as well as low TPM dose seem to affect the control of epileptic seizures.

Effect of CYP Inducers/Inhibitors on Topiramate Concentration: Clinical Value of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

This study investigated the pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate (TPM) and concomitant antiepileptic drugs and evaluated the therapeutic concentration range of TPM and the effect of the achieved plasma concentration on the retention rate of TPM therapy. A total of 1217 plasma samples obtained from 610 patients were retrospectively investigated, and the concentration-to-dose ratio (CD ratio) of TPM was compared among patients on various antiepileptic drug regimens. In addition, the therapeutic concentration of TPM was reviewed in patients on long-term therapy, and factors influencing the retention rate of TPM were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Among patients using hepatic enzyme inducers (phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine), the CD ratio was reduced by 45.4% in adults and 33.3% in children. Patients taking phenytoin concomitantly had a significantly lower CD ratio than patients taking phenobarbital or carbamazepine. Among noninducers, concomitant use of stiripentol increased the CD ratio. In 276 patients who remained on TPM therapy for more than 2 years, the mean therapeutic concentration was 5.1 mcg/mL (15.0 μmol/L). The estimated retention day was significantly higher for patients with a TPM concentration >5 mcg/mL than that for patients with a concentration <5 mcg/mL (945 versus 802 days; P = 0.007 by the log-rank test). Also, patients without hepatic enzyme inducers had a significantly higher retention rate than patients using such inducers (P = 0.002). Concomitant use of hepatic enzyme inducers markedly reduced the plasma TPM concentration and can decrease its antiepileptic effect. A therapeutic concentration of >5 mcg/mL TPM was significantly associated with continuation of therapy, and therapeutic drug monitoring can be helpful.

Intrapatient variation in antiepileptic drug plasma concentration after generic substitution vs stable brand-name drug regimens

Generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is still a matter of controversy and concern among clinicians and patients. We aimed to assess intrasubject variation in plasma concentrations of lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate (TPM) after generic substitution compared with a stable brand-name drug regimen in a population of patients with epilepsy. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected and stored data from our therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database for the years 2009–2014. The main outcome variable was the proportion of patients who, after switching from branded to generic formulations, showed a greater than ±20% change in AED plasma concentrations compared to the proportion of control patients showing a change in AED plasma concentrations of the same extent while receiving stable branded formulations over repeated TDM tests. Fifty patients on LTG, 27 on LEV and 16 on TPM showing at least one TDM test while receiving generic products fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the analysis and were compared with 200 control patients for LTG, 120 for LEV and 80 for TPM. The proportion of patients showing an intrasubject change greater than ±20% in AED plasma concentrations was similar in the brand name vs generic group compared with the control one for LTG (22% vs 33%) and LEV (44% vs 38%), while it was higher in the control group for TPM (41% vs 6%, p<0.01). These are the first data in the literature about the within-patient variation in steady-state plasma concentrations of a series of stable treatments with brand-name AEDs in a real clinical setting. In conclusion, a significant interday variability in intrapatient LTG, LEV and TPM plasma concentrations can be observed even in patients stabilized with the same brand name product over time. This suggests that any change in plasma AED concentration and possible related clinical effects after generic substitution may be not necessarily related to the switch. Our results should be confirmed by large, prospective, blinded, randomized controlled studies in people with epilepsy.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Intravenous and Oral Topiramate and Its Effect on the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test in Adult Healthy Volunteers.

A sequential pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling approach was used to quantify the effects of a single dose of topiramate (100 or 200 mg) on working memory, attention, and psychomotor speed as measured by the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Established on data pooled from 3 randomized, crossover studies in healthy subjects (19-55 years of age), using both oral and a novel stable-labeled intravenous (IV) formulation of topiramate, an inhibitory Emax model was found to characterize the topiramate concentration-SDMT score relationship well. At the EC50 of 2.85 μg/mL, this topiramate plasma concentration value was estimated to be associated with a 25.5% reduction of SDMT score relative to baseline. Age was an important determinant of the baseline SDMT score, with an estimated decrease of 1.13% in baseline SDMT score with every year of age. Moreover, this approach enabled the quantification of the practice effect observed with repeated administration of the neuropsychological test over shorter testing intervals than have previously been reported in the literature. The finding of a significant effect following a single dose of topiramate in the range widely used to treat migraine and epilepsy needs to be evaluated in a broader patient population undergoing chronic treatment, as the narrow range of resultant concentrations limits the generalizability of the findings.

Simple and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography method with fluorescence detection for therapeutic drug monitoring of topiramate

A simple, sensitive, accurate, precise and inexpensive HPLC method with fluorescence detection, suitable for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of an antiepileptic drug topiramate, was developed and validated. The determination of plasma topiramate concentration was carried out after precolumn derivatization, using 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan as a fluorescent labeling agent and bendroflumethiazide as an internal standard. The standard calibration curve was linear over the concentration range of 0.01-24 μg/mL (r² > 0.9998). The intra- and inter-day accuracies expressed as bias were from 1.4 to 9.9% and from 1.9 to 10.2%, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precisions were below 7.9% and 2.7%, respectively. The validated method was applied for the measurement of plasma topiramate concentrations in patients with epilepsy. The reported method is appropriate for TDM of topiramate as well as for pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of intravenous and oral topiramate and its effect on phonemic fluency in adult healthy volunteers.

The aim was to develop a quantitative approach that characterizes the magnitude of and variability in phonemic generative fluency scores as measured by the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) test in healthy volunteers after administration of an oral and a novel intravenous (IV) formulation of topiramate (TPM). Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was used to describe the plasma TPM concentrations resulting from oral or IV administration. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was developed sequentially to characterize the effect of TPM concentrations on COWA with different distributional assumptions. Topiramate was rapidly absorbed, with a median time to maximal concentration of 1 h and an oral bioavailability of ~100%. Baseline COWA score increased by an average of 12% after the third administration on drug-free sessions. An exponential model described the decline of COWA scores, which decreased by 14.5% for each 1 mg l(-1) increase in TPM concentration. The COWA scores were described equally well by both continuous normal and Poisson distributions. This analysis quantified the effect of TPM exposure on generative verbal fluency as measured by COWA. Repetitive administration of COWA resulted in a better performance, possibly due to a learning effect. The model predicts a 27% reduction in the COWA score at the average observed maximal plasma concentration after a 100 mg dose of TPM. The single-dose administration of relatively low TPM doses and narrow range of resultant concentrations in our study were limitations to investigating the PK-PD relationship at higher TPM exposures. Hence, the findings may not be readily generalized to the broader patient population.

Pharmacokinetics of topiramate in patients with renal impairment, end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis, or hepatic impairment

Topiramate is primarily renally excreted. Chronic renal and hepatic impairment can affect the clearance of topiramate. Therefore, the objective was to establish dosage guidelines for topiramate in chronic renal impairment, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis, or chronic hepatic impairment patients. In 3 separate open-label, parallel group studies (n=5-7/group), in patients with mild-moderate and severe renal impairment (based on creatinine clearance), ESRD requiring hemodialysis, or moderate-severe hepatic impairment (based on Child-Pugh classification) and matching healthy participants, pharmacokinetics of a single oral 100mg topiramate was determined. Compared with healthy controls, overall exposure (AUC0-∞) for topiramate was higher in mild-moderate (85%) and severe renal impairment (117%), consistent with significantly (p<0.05) lower apparent total body clearance (CL/F) and renal clearance (CLR), leading to longer elimination half-life. Both CLR and CL/F of topiramate correlated well with renal function. CL/F was comparable in ESRD and severe renal impairment. Half of usual starting and maintenance dose is recommended in moderate-severe renal impairment patients, and those with ESRD. Hemodialysis effectively removed plasma topiramate with mean dialysis clearance approximately 12-fold greater than CL/F (123.5 mL/min versus 10.8 mL/min). Compared with healthy matched, patients with moderate-severe hepatic impairment exhibited small increase (29%) in topiramate peak plasma concentrations and AUC0-∞ values, consistent with lower CL/F (26%). Topiramate was generally well tolerated. Half of usual dose is recommended for moderate-severe renal impairment and ESRD. Supplemental dose may be required during hemodialysis. Dose adjustments might not be required in moderate-severe hepatic impairments; however, the small sample size limits generalization.

Comparative steady‐state pharmacokinetic evaluation of immediate‐release topiramate and USL255, a once‐daily extended‐release topiramate formulation

Compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of immediate- and extended-release formulations of topiramate (TPM) in healthy subjects following multiple dosing, and evaluate maintenance of topiramate exposures after switching formulations. A randomized, open-label, single-center, two-way crossover, multiple-dose study comparing the steady-state PK profile of once-daily extended-release topiramate (USL255) to immediate-release topiramate (TPM-IR) administered twice-daily. The TPM PK profile was evaluated using standard PK parameters (e.g., AUC0-24 , Cmax , Cmin ) as well as less common PK criteria such as fluctuation index (FI), peak occupancy time (POT), and percent coefficient of variation (%CV). In addition, partial AUC (AUCp ) analyses provided comparisons of the AUC profiles over predetermined time intervals between TPM-IR and USL255. Pharmacokinetic equivalence between formulations was defined as containment of the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the USL255/TPM-IR geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratio within the equivalence limits of 80-125%. The effect of switching between treatments was assessed by evaluating equivalence of PK parameters between the day prior to formulation switch and the day immediately following formulation switch. Maintenance of steady state after switching formulations was also evaluated by comparing the slope between Cmin values at formulation switch and 24 h postswitch. Tolerability was evaluated through adverse event monitoring, vital sign measurements, and clinical laboratory evaluations. USL255 was well tolerated and provided TPM plasma exposure equivalent to TPM-IR at various time intervals. USL255 also demonstrated a significantly lower Cmax (p < 0.001) and higher Cmin (p < 0.001), longer tmax , lower %CV, and 26% decreased FI, as compared with TPM-IR. Further, switching between TPM-IR and USL255 did not affect TPM concentrations, including Cmin , immediately after transitioning and at steady state. As compared with TPM-IR, USL255 provided equivalent plasma exposure with an extended absorption profile. Therefore, USL255 offers a once-daily alternative to twice-daily TPM-IR, with reduced TPM fluctuations.

Plasma topiramate concentrations resulting from doses associated with neuroprotection against white matter injury and stroke in two strains of rat pups

Cerebral white matter (WM) injury and stroke are common neuropathological injuries in newborns with congenital heart defects (CHDs) requiring surgery. Previous investigations in Long Evans rat pups subjected to hypoxia-ischemia found that intraperitoneal (i.p.) topiramate (TPM) at 30 mg/kg, but not 50 mg/kg, conferred neuroprotection. In Sprague-Dawley pups, a dose of 30 mg/kg protected against stroke. Concentrations associated with neuroprotective doses were not measured. The aims of this investigation were to determine concentrations associated with neuroprotective doses and to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of i.p. TPM. Concentration-time data following administration of 30 and 50 mg/kg doses were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Mean predicted steady-state maximum and average concentrations following 30 mg/kg TPM were 31.3 and 16.8 μg/ml in Long Evans and 39.9 and 24.4 μg/ml in Sprague-Dawley pups. Mean predicted steady-state maximum and average concentrations following 50 mg/kg TPM were 52.1 and 28.1 μg/ml in Long Evans and 66.5 and 40.6 μg/ml in Sprague-Dawley pups. The apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) were 0.0470 ml/min and 22.2 ml, respectively, for Long Evans and 0.0325 ml/min and 19.7 ml, respectively, for Sprague-Dawley pups. TPM concentrations associated with neuroprotective doses were determined. Body size and strain were significant covariates on CL/F and V/F. Results provide targets for future neuroprotection studies.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of adjunctive topiramate in infants (1–24 months) with refractory partial‐onset seizures: A randomized, multicenter, open‐label phase 1 study

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of adjunctive topiramate in infants (1-24 months) with refractory partial-onset seizures (POS); also to evaluate safety and tolerability of topiramate in the dose range of 3-25 mg/kg/day. In this open-label phase 1 study, infants (N = 55) with refractory POS receiving at least one concurrent antiepileptic drug (AED) were enrolled. Infants were stratified by age and randomly assigned to one of four topiramate target dose groups (3-, 5-, 15-, or 25 mg/kg/day). Treatment was initiated at 3 mg/kg/day with titration to the target dose by weekly dose escalation. Topiramate was administered daily in two divided doses as oral liquid (5 mg/ml for infants <9 kg or those who could not tolerate solid foods) or sprinkle capsule (25 mg) formulations. Following seven consecutive days of topiramate administration at the target dose, four blood samples were collected from each infant for pharmacokinetic assessments (predose, 1-3, 4-6, and 8-10 h postdose). Fifty-five infants (mean [SD] age in months: 11.4 [5.79]) with POS were enrolled, of whom 33% had seizures with or without secondary generalization. Complete pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained in 35 infants in whom mean plasma topiramate concentration-time profiles demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics (predose topiramate concentrations [C(trough) ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 through 12 h [AUC(12 h)]) of topiramate over the dose range studied). Apparent steady state oral clearance (CL(ss) /F) remained similar across all topiramate target dose groups and was independent of creatinine clearance, age, and weight. Mean values for CL(ss) /F were approximately twofold greater in infants receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs versus enzyme-inhibiting AEDs. Topiramate was well tolerated and safety findings were consistent with previous reports in children and adults. Most common treatment emergent adverse events (≥10%) were upper respiratory tract infection, fever, vomiting, somnolence, and anorexia. In infants (1-24 months), topiramate exhibited linear steady state pharmacokinetics over the dose range 3-25 mg/kg/day, and CL(ss) /F of topiramate was independent of dose. Moreover, the concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs doubled the clearance of topiramate. Topiramate was generally well tolerated as adjunctive therapy at doses up to 25 mg/kg/day.

The effect of topiramate plasma concentration on linguistic behavior, verbal recall and working memory

This is the first study of the effect of topiramate on linguistic behavior and verbal recall using a computational linguistics system for automated language and speech analysis to detect and quantify drug-induced changes in speech recorded during discourse‐level tasks. Healthy volunteers were administered a single, 100‐mg oral dose of topiramate in two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies. Subjects' topiramate plasma levels ranged from 0.23 to 2.81μg/mL. We found a significant association between topiramate levels and impairment on measures of verbal fluency elicited during a picture description task, correct number of words recalled on a paragraph recall test, and reaction time recorded during a working memory task. Using the tools of clinical pharmacology and computational linguistics, we elucidated the relationship between the determinants of a drug's disposition as reflected in plasma concentrations and their impact on cognitive functioning as reflected in spoken language discourse.

Extended-Release Topiramate (USL255) Exhibits Linear Dose-Proportional Pharmacokinetic Characteristics (P06.128)

Objective: Evaluate dose proportionality, linearity, and tolerability of USL255 at 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg. Background Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. has developed USL255, a novel, once-daily, extended-release topiramate (TPM) formulation. USL255 provides equivalent TPM exposure as compared with immediate-release TPM (TMP-IR) administered twice-daily, yet exhibits an improved pharmacokinetic (PK) profile (eg, lower C max , higher C min , decreased fluctuation index [FI]). Design/Methods: This Phase I, single-dose, open-label, 5-way crossover study evaluated the PK profile of USL255 in healthy subjects. Dose proportionality was determined using a power model approach, where PK parameters were considered proportional if the confidence interval (CI) for the ratios of dose-normalized geometric mean values (R dnm ) or geometric least-squares means (GLSM) were completely contained between 0.8 – 1.25. Linearity was assessed by modeling, and deviation from linearity was tested using the type I F test (α=.05). Tolerability was evaluated through adverse event (AE) monitoring, vital sign measurements, and clinical laboratory evaluations. Results: Total TPM exposure for USL255 was dose proportional and linear from 25 mg – 400 mg. Maximum TPM plasma concentration neared dose-proportionality for the 100 mg – 400 mg doses (R dnm 90%;CI, 1.10 – 1.27). Subsequent analyses compared the dose-normalized C max values of USL255 400 mg to 200 mg, and 200 mg to 100 mg; 90% CIs for these analyses were completely contained between 0.80 – 1.25, indicating that C max changed proportionally with dose. All USL255 doses were well tolerated, and the percentage of subjects who experienced a treatment-emergent AE generally increased with ascending doses. Conclusions: Single-dose USL255 TPM exposure was dose proportional and linear from 25 mg to 400 mg, and C max appeared dose proportional over the higher doses (100 mg – 400 mg), suggesting that USL255 may provide a once-daily alternative to TPM-IR with flexible dosing (25 mg – 400 mg), predictable plasma concentrations, and a favorable tolerability profile. Supported by: Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. Disclosure: Dr. Halvorsen has received personal compensation for activities with Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. as an employee.Dr. Halvorsen holds stock and/or stock options in Medtronic, Stryker, Elan, Teva, Gilead, and Pfizer. Dr. Lambrecht has received personal compensation for activities with Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. as an employee.Dr. Lambrecht holds stock and/or stock options in Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Todd has received personal compensation for activities with Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc., as an employee. Dr. Todd holds stock and/or stock options in Pfizer Inc.

A sensitive capillary GC‐MS method for analysis of topiramate from plasma obtained from single‐dose studies

Topiramate (Topamax®) is an antiepileptic medication used as adjunctive and monotherapy in patients with epilepsy and for migraine prophylaxis. A GC-MS assay was developed that was capable of detecting topiramate plasma concentrations following a single rectal or oral dose administration. Topiramate plasma samples were prepared by solid-phase extraction and were quantified by GC-MS analysis. The topiramate standard curves were split from 0.1 to 4 µg/mL and from 4 to 40 µg/mL in order to give a more accurate determination of the topiramate concentration. The accuracy of the standards ranged from 94.6 to 107.3% and the precision (%CV) ranged from 1.0 to 5.3% for both curves at all concentrations. The %CV for quality controls was <7.6%. The assay is both accurate and precise and will be used to complete future pharmacokinetic studies.

Genetic and environmental correlates of topiramate‐induced cognitive impairment

Topiramate is an antiepileptic drug that has marked treatment-limiting side effects on specific aspects of cognitive performance in both patients and healthy volunteers. Because these severe side effects occur only in certain individuals, identifying genetic or environmental variables that influence cognitive response would be of great utility in determining whether to administer this drug to a patient. We gave an acute 100 mg oral dose of topiramate to 158 healthy volunteers and measured how the drug changed their performance on a diverse battery of cognitive tests. We found a wide range of responses to topiramate, and we demonstrated that not all tests in the battery were equally affected. There was no correlation between the effect of topiramate and either education level or baseline cognitive performance. Of interest, there was an up to 55-fold variation in the topiramate plasma levels of the participants. Our genome-wide association study (GWAS) of cognitive response did not reveal any genome-wide significant associations; the study was powered to find variants explaining at least 25% of the variation in cognitive response. Combining the results of this GWAS with a retrospective study of cognitive complaints in 290 epilepsy patients who received topiramate as part of their treatment also did not result in a significant association. Our results support the need for additional genetic studies of topiramate that use larger sample sizes.

Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of USL255, a new once-daily extended-release formulation of topiramate

To compare the pharmacokinetics of USL255, a once-daily extended-release (ER) formulation of topiramate (TPM), with Topamax (immediate-release TPM) in healthy subjects after oral dosing and evaluate the effect of food on USL255 bioavailability and pharmacokinetics. This randomized, single-center, open-label, cross-over design study had three dosing periods separated by 21 days of washout between treatments. Thirty-six volunteers received single doses of USL255 (200 mg) in fasted and fed conditions and two doses of Topamax (100 mg) administered 12 h apart. TPM plasma samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. USL255 fasted pharmacokinetic parameters [point estimate (90% confidence interval, CI) compared to Topamax] were: relative bioavailability (F) 91.2% (84-99%), peak plasma concentration (C(max)) USL255/Topamax-ratio 59% (53-65%), time to reach C(max) (t(max)) 19.5 ± 7.2 h, accumulation ratio (R(ac)) 3.9 ± 1.2, effective half-life (t(1/2,eff)) 55.7 ± 19.9 h, terminal half-life (t(1/2,z)) 80.2 ± 14.2 h, and peak-occupancy-time (POT) 12.1 ± 4.0 h. Although the F and C(max) were unaffected by food, R(ac) and t(1/2,eff) increased to 4.9 ± 0.9, and 72.5 ± 15.4 h, respectively. In contrast to t(1/2,z,) t(1/2,eff) reflects absorption rate; therefore, USL255's t(1/2,eff) was significantly longer than Topamax's t(1/2,eff) (37.1 ± 6.5 h). Although bioequivalent to Topamax in extent of absorption, USL255 had a slower absorption rate as reflected in its lower C(max) and longer t(max), larger POT and longer t(1/2,eff), and similar R(ac) values to that of Topamax (q12 h). This relative flat plasma profile allows for once-daily dosing with diminished fluctuations in TPM plasma levels. In addition, neither USL255's peak nor extent of plasma exposure of TPM was affected by food.

Effect of pregnancy on topiramate pharmacokinetics in rabbits

Pregnancy is associated with various physiological changes that may lead to significant alterations in the pharmacokinetic profiles of many drugs. The present study was designed to investigate the potential effects of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of topiramate (TPM) in the rabbit model.Nineteen female New Zealand white rabbits (nine pregnant and 10 non-pregnant) were used in this study. Blood samples were collected from the animals just before receiving TPM orally at a dose of 20 mg/kg and then serially for up to 24 h. TPM plasma samples were analysed using a validated tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method.The mean values of TPM pharmacokinetic parameters (t1/2, Tmax, AUC0–∞, and CL/F) were significantly modified in pregnant rabbits as compared with non-pregnant group. Pregnancy significantly (P < 0.05) increased TPM half-life (t1/2), time to attain the maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and the area under TPM plasma concentration–time curve (AUC0-∞) and decreased the drug’s oral clearance (CL/F) compared with non-pregnancy state in rabbits.The present study demonstrates that pregnancy alters the pharmacokinetics of TPM in rabbits in late gestational period and considerable inter-animal variability was observed. The findings of the present study indicate that TPM CL/F is decreased during late pregnancy in the rabbit model.