Tokyo Guidelines Research Articles

International Delphi consensus on the management of percutaneous choleystostomy in acute cholecystitis (E-AHPBA, ANS, WSES societies)

BackgroundThere has been a progressive increase in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in acute cholecystitis (AC) over the last decades due to population aging, and the support of guidelines (Tokyo Guidelines (TG), World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Guidelines) as a valid therapeutical option. However, there are many unanswered questions about the management of PCs. An international consensus on indications and PC management using Delphi methodology with contributions from experts from three surgical societies (EAHPBA, ANS, WSES) have been performed.MethodsA two-round Delphi consensus, which included 27 questions, was sent to key opinion leaders in AC. Participants were asked to indicate their ‘agreement/disagreement’ using a 5-point Likert scale. Survey items with less than 70% consensus were excluded from the second round. For inclusion in the final recommendations, each survey item had to have reached a group consensus (≥ 70% agreement) by the end of the two survey rounds.Results54 completed both rounds (82% of invitees). Six questions got > 70% and are included in consensus recommendations: In patients with acute cholecystitis, when there is a clear indication of PC, it is not necessary to wait 48 h to be carried out; Surgery is the first therapeutic option for the TG grade II acute cholecystitis in a patient suitable for surgery; Before PC removal a cholangiography should be done; There is no indication for PC in Tokyo Guidelines (TG) grade I patients; Transhepatic approach is the route of choice for PC; and after PC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred approach (93.1%).ConclusionsOnly six statements about PC management after AC got an international consensus. An international guideline about the management of PCs are necessary.

Multicenter analysis of the efficacy of early cholecystectomy and preoperative cholecystostomy for severe acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of data from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology

BackgroundSevere acute cholecystitis (AC) is a challenging disease because it comprises coexisting systemic infections that lead to vital organ dysfunction. This study evaluated the optimal surgical timing and efficacy of preoperative percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for patients with severe AC.MethodsData of 142 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for severe AC between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively collected from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology. Patients were divided into the early cholecystectomy (EC) group (within 72 h of symptom onset) and delayed cholecystectomy (DC) group. They were also subdivided into the upfront cholecystectomy group and preoperative PC before cholecystectomy group. The diagnosis and severity of AC were graded according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018. Clinicopathological variables and outcomes were compared.ResultsNo significant differences in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and Charlson comorbidity index between the EC and DC groups were observed. Preoperative drainage was more commonly performed for the DC group than for the EC group. Local severe AC features were more commonly detected in the DC group than in the EC group. The postoperative outcomes of the EC and DC groups were comparable. Compared to the PC before cholecystectomy group, the upfront cholecystectomy group included more patients with ASA physical status ≥ 3 and more patients who used oral warfarin. Warfarin usage and cardiovascular dysfunction rates of the PC after cholecystectomy group were higher than those of the upfront cholecystectomy group. PC was associated with significantly less intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stays.ConclusionsPatients who can tolerate general anesthesia are good candidates for EC. Patients who use warfarin and those with cardiovascular dysfunction are considered to be at high risk for postoperative complications; therefore, to prevent AC recurrence during the waiting period, PC before cholecystectomy during the same admission is more appropriate than upfront cholecystectomy for these patients.

Pericholecystic Fat Stranding as a Predictive Factor of Length of Stays of Patients with Acute Cholecystitis: A Novel Scoring Model.

Background: The 2018 Tokyo Guidelines (TG18) are used to classify the severity of acute cholecystitis (AC) but insufficient to predict the length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: For patients with AC, clinical factors and computed tomography features, including our proposed grading system of pericholecystic fat stranding were used for predicting an LOS of ≥7 days in the logistic regression models. Results: Our multivariable model showed age ≥ 65 years (OR: 2.56, p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 2 mg/dL (OR: 1.97, p = 0.013), gamma-glutamyltransferase levels (OR: 2.460, p = 0.001), TG18 grade (OR: 2.89 per grade, p < 0.001), and moderate to severe pericholecystic fat stranding (OR: 2.14, p = 0.012) exhibited prolonged LOS ≥ 7 days. Conclusions: We developed a scoring model, including TG18 grades (score of 1-3 per grade), our grading system of fat stranding (score of 1), CRP (score of 1), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (score of 1), and a cutoff of >3 had highest diagnostic performance.

Nomogram for assistant diagnosing acute suppurative cholangitis: a case-control study

BackgroundAcute suppurative cholangitis (ASC) lacks sensitive and specific preoperative diagnostic criteria. Some researchers suggest treating ASC as severe cholangitis. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) grading system for acute cholangitis (AC) and the diagnosis of acute suppurative cholangitis (ASC), searching for independent risk factors of ASC and develop a nomogram to discriminate ASC from acute nonsuppurative cholangitis (ANSC) accurately.MethodsAfter applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 401 patients with acute cholangitis (AC) were retrospectively analyzed at Nanjing First Hospital between January 2015 and June 2023. SPSS version 27.0 and R studio software were used to analyze data obtained from medical records. The results were validated in a prospective cohort of 82 AC patients diagnosed at Nanjing First Hospital between July 2023 and February 2024.ResultsAmong the 401 patients, 102 had suppurative bile (the ASC group; AC grade I: 40 [39.2%], AC grade II: 27 [26.5%], AC grade III: 35 [34.3%]), whereas 299 did not have (the ANSC group; AC grade I: 157 [52.5%], AC grade II: 92 [30.8%], AC grade III: 50 [16.7%]). The specificity of ASC for diagnosing moderate-to-severe cholangitis is 79.7%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified concurrent cholecystitis, CRP, PCT, TBA, and bile duct diameter as independent risk factors for suppurative bile, and all of these factors were included in the nomogram. The calibration curve exhibited consistency between the nomogram and the actual observation, and the area under the curve was 0.875 (95% confidence interval: 0.835–0.915), sensitivity was 86.6%, and specificity was 75.5%.ConclusionSuppurative bile is a specific indicator for diagnosing moderate-to-severe cholangitis. However, diagnosing ASC with AC grade II and AC grade III has the risk of missed diagnosis as the sensitivity is only 60.8%. To improve the diagnostic rate of ASC, this study identified concurrent cholecystitis, CRP, PCT, TBA, and preoperative bile duct diameter as independent risk factors for ASC, and a nomogram was developed to help physicians recognize patients with ASC.

ThP4.8 - Establishing a Hot Gallbladder Pathway: An Optimal and Advantageous Intervention

Abstract Introduction NICE, AUGIS and Tokyo guidelines recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in symptomatic gallstone disease. We highlight our implementation of a hot gallbladder (HGB) pathway, dedicated to HGB cases in a district general hospital with a 550-bed capacity. Methods To implement a HGB service we established a formal evidence-based SOP alongside two theatre lists and six clinic slots a week. Ongoing retrospective data collection allowed us to analyse the efficacy of our interventions between January and December 2023 (n=244). Results In our cohort, biliary colic remains the commonest diagnosis (51.2%) versus acute cholecystitis (27.5%), with female predominance (80% v 20%). Prior to HGB pathway introduction in April (January–March, n=73), 13.7% underwent HGB surgery. After HGB pathway implementation (May–Dec, n=171), 28.7% had HGB surgery with a mean waiting time of 9.6 days from admission. There has additionally been an 18% decrease in patients awaiting cholecystectomy since HGB pathway implementation. Significant delays exist in obtaining an MRCP (8.48 days) and ERCP (5.87 days) when required. Complication and readmission rates were consistent with those published in literature. Conclusion Establishing a HGB pathway facilitated earlier treatment for patients and notably decreased the numbers awaiting cholecystectomy. Significant delays in obtaining MRCP/ERCP could be improved with dedicated MRCP or ERCP slots. Favourable patient outcomes alongside the almost double NHS tariff payments given to ELC compared to elective cholecystectomy, provides incentive for hospitals to implement HGB lists.

Impact of timing of ERCP on long term outcomes of ERCP for acute cholangitis – A single center retrospective study

IntroductionAcute cholangitis is a critical medical emergency. The association between the timing of ERCP and clinical outcomes of acute cholangitis is still debated. The current study aims to evaluate whether ERCP within 48 h (urgent) is associated with improved long term clinical outcomes. MethodsThis study is a single-center retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients admitted with acute cholangitis as per Tokyo guidelines at AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad between January 2022 to December 2022 were included. We evaluated the association between urgent ERCP and length of hospital stay, need for reintervention and readmissions, and mortality. ResultsA total of consecutive 301 patients underwent ERCP for acute cholangitis; of which 217 patients (31.3 % females; mean age 54.02 ± 14.9 years) underwent urgent ERCP. The remaining 84 (32.1 % females; mean age 56.56 ± 13.9 years) underwent routine ERCP. Fifty-eight (26.7 %) and 22 (26.2 %) patients with Grade III underwent urgent and routine ERCP respectively. The median (IQR) hospital stay for urgent ERCP was 8.00 (6.00 – 11.00) days and for routine ERCP was 11.00(8.00 – 15.00; p value 0.0001), with similar hospital stay post ERCP (p 0.26). There was no significant difference in mortality upto one year between patients who underwent urgent (22.1 %;48/217) or routine ERCP (31.0 %;26/84, p 0.135). The cox proportional hazard model showed that mortality is independently associated with older age (HR 1.034;95 %CI: 1.013 – 1.054; p 0.001) and malignancy (HR 8.64;95 %CI:4.728 – 15.790; p 0.0001). There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of need for reinterventions and readmissions. ConclusionsUrgent ERCP for acute cholangitis is associated comparable overall mortality, need for reinterventions, and readmissions with decreased total length of hospital stay. There is an unmet need to confirm these findings by randomized controlled studies.

Prediction of intraoperative surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography.

Although findings from drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography (DIC-CT) are useful in preoperative anatomic evaluation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), their relationship with intraoperative surgical difficulty based on the difficulty score (DS) proposed by Tokyo Guidelines 2018 is unclear. We examined this relationship. Data were collected from 202 patients who underwent LC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease with preoperative DIC-CT in our department. DIC-CT findings were classified into GB-positive and GB-negative groups based on GB opacification, and clinical characteristics were compared. DS assessed only on findings from around Calot's triangle was considered "cDS", and patients were divided into cDS ≤2 and ≥3 groups. Preoperative data including DIC-CT findings were evaluated using multivariate analysis. DIC-CT findings showed 151 (74.8%) GB-positive and 51 (25.2%) GB-negative patients. Surgical outcomes were significantly better in the GB-positive versus GB-negative group for operation time (107 vs. 154 min, p < .001), blood loss (8 vs. 25 mL, p < .001), cDS (0.8 vs. 2.2, p < .001), and critical view of safety score (4.0 vs. 3.1, p < .001). cDS was ≤2 in 174 (86.1%) and ≥3 in 28 (13.9%) patients. By multivariate analysis, DIC-CT findings and alkaline phosphatase values were independent factors predicting intraoperative difficulty. DIC-CT findings are useful for predicting cDS in LC.

Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients with Acute Cholangitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients with acute cholangitis (AC) by comparing outcomes, complications, and hospital stays in a tertiary Gastroenterology department. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary gastroenterology department, collecting data from all AC and AC + COVID-19 patients between April 2020 and February 2022. Data included clinical and demographic information, COVID-19-specific details, acute cholangitis presentation, medical records, laboratory results, and interventions. AC was diagnosed using Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) criteria, with all patients undergoing bile culture sampling. Results: The study included 241 patients, 30 in the COVID group and 211 in the non-COVID group. The COVID group's mean age was significantly higher (74.3 vs. 67.3 years, p < 0.009). Abdominal pain was more common in the COVID group (90% vs. 70.6%, p < 0.025). Length of hospital stay was longer for COVID patients (13.5 vs. 7.9 days, p < 0.001). COVID patients had higher incidences of malignant causes of AC, with pancreatic cancer being the most common (30%). Pseudomonas spp. was significantly more prevalent in COVID patients (16.7% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.028). Conclusions: Our study results show that COVID-19 affected the duration of hospitalization for patients with AC. Furthermore, this study presents observations regarding the impact of COVID-19 on AC, revealing differences in microbial profiles.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency cholecystectomy for mild to moderate acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundEmergency cholecystectomy is the mainstay in treating acute cholecystitis (AC). In actual practice, perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are used to prevent postoperative infectious complications (PIC), but their effectiveness lacks evidence. We aim to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in emergency cholecystectomy.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus up to June 14, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved patients diagnosed with mild to moderate AC according to Tokyo guidelines who were undergoing emergency cholecystectomy and were administered preoperative and/or postoperative antibiotics as an intervention group and compared to a placebo group. For dichotomous data, we applied the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI), while for continuous data, we used the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI.ResultsWe included seven RCTs encompassing a collective sample size of 1747 patients. Our analysis showed no significant differences regarding total PIC (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.63, 1.12), P = 0.23), surgical site infection (RR = 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56, 1.12), P = 0.19), distant infections (RR = 1.01 with 95% CI (0.55, 1.88), P = 0.97), non-infectious complications (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.64, 1.11), P = 0.22), mortality (RR = 0.34 with 95% CI (0.04, 3.23), P = 0.35), and readmission (RR = 0.69 with 95% CI (0.43, 1.11), P = 0.13).ConclusionPerioperative antibiotics in patients with mild to moderate acute cholecystitis did not show a significant reduction of postoperative infectious complications after emergency cholecystectomy. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023438755).

The Hanging Strap Method: A Safe and Easy-to-Use Surgical Technique for Surgeons-in-Training Performing Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Introduction Surgeons-in-training (SIT) perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); however, it is challenging to complete the procedure safely in difficult cases. We present a surgical technique during difficult LC, which we named the hanging strap method. Methods We retrospectively compared the perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing difficult LC with the hanging strap method (HANGS, n = 34), and patients undergoing difficult LC without the hanging strap method (non-HANGS, n = 56) from 2022 and 2024. Difficult LC was defined as cases classified as more than grade II cholecystitis by the Tokyo Guidelines 18 and cases when LC was undergoing over five days after the onset of cholecystitis. Results The proportion of SIT with post-graduate year (PGY) ≤ 7 was significantly higher in the HANGS group than in the non-HANGS group (82.4% vs. 33.9%, P < 0.001). The overall rate of bile duct injury (BDI), postoperative bile leakage and operative mortality were zero in the whole cohort. There were no significant differences between the HANGS and non-HANGS groups in background characteristics, operative time (122 min vs. 132 min, P = 0.830) and surgical blood loss (14 mL vs. 24 mL, P = 0.533). Conclusions Our findings suggested that the hanging strap method is safe and easy to use for difficult LC. We recommend that the current method be selected as one of the surgical techniques for SIT when performing difficult LC.

Comparison of antimicrobial therapy termination in febrile and afebrile patients with acute cholangitis after drainage

The standard treatment duration for acute cholangitis (AC) involves a 4–7-day antimicrobial treatment post-biliary drainage; however, recent studies have suggested that a ≤ 2–3 days is sufficient. However, clinical practice frequently depends on body temperature as a criterion for discontinuing antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, in this study, we assessed whether patients with AC can achieve successful outcomes with a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment, even with a fever, assuming the infection source is effectively controlled. We conducted a single-center retrospective study involving patients with AC, defined following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for any cause, who underwent successful biliary drainage and completed a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment. Patients were categorized into the febrile and afebrile groups based on their body temperature within 24 h before completing antimicrobial treatment. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate, defined as no initial presenting symptoms by day 14 post-biliary drainage without recurrence or death by day 30. The secondary outcome was a 3-month recurrence rate. Logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used. Overall, 408 patients were selected, among whom 40 (9.8%) were febrile. The two groups showed no significant differences in the clinical cure and 3-month recurrence rates. Notably, the subgroups limited to patients with a ≤ 3-day antibiotic treatment duration also showed no differences in these outcomes. Therefore, our results suggest that discontinuing antibiotics within the initially planned treatment period was sufficient for successful drainage cases of AC, regardless of the patient's fever status during the 24 h leading up to termination.

Diagnosis and management approach of acute cholangitis with sepsis complications in a peripheral hospital: a case report

Acute cholangitis is a systemic, life-threatening condition that develops as a result of obstruction and infection of the bile ducts. The two main processes leading to acute cholangitis include obstruction of the biliary tract and the growth of bacteria in the bile. A case of acute cholangitis has been reported at Rote Ndao public hospital, Rote Ndao district, East Nusa Tenggara, in a 57-year-old woman, with the main complaint of right upper abdominal pain, jaundice, and fever. The diagnostic approach is based on anamnesis, physical examination, and supporting examinations. Based on the Tokyo guideline 2018 (TG18) the patient met a suspected diagnosis, with A criteria that was evidence of systemic inflammation in the form of fever (body temperature 38.7o C), evidence of an inflammatory response with increasing leukocyte count (26,200/cm3), and for the B criteria that was evidence of cholestasis in the form of jaundice, increasing of total bilirubin (19.8 mg/dL), abnormal liver function tests (SGOT 135 IU/L, SGPT 74 IU/L), while C criteria cannot be performed due to limited hospital imaging facilities. Limitations of investigations should not limit the diagnosis and initial management so it can give the good prognosis. Even though there were complications of sepsis, the patient did not experience signs of shock which could lead to mortality.

Routine upper gastro-intestinal tract endoscopy before elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones-justified

Gallstones are common in Western countries and increasing in developing countries through adoption of western lifestyle. Gallstones may cause life-threatening complications, including acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallstones. Presentation of symptomatic gallstones may be indistinguishable from that of other upper gastro-intestinal tract (UGI) pathologies. Some surgeons routinely perform preoperative UGI endoscopy to diagnose and treat concomitant UGI pathology. A prospective cross-sectional observational study was undertaken at University of Pretoria teaching hospitals to evaluate this practice. Patients aged 18 years and older, with symptomatic gallstones but did not satisfy Tokyo guidelines for acute cholecystitis were recruited. UGI endoscopy was performed before cholecystectomy. There were 124 patients, 110 (88.7%) females and 14 (11.3%) males, mean age 44.0 (13.2) (range: 22–78) years. Most common symptoms were right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain (87%), epigastric pain (59.7%), nausea (58.1%) and vomiting (47.9%). Clinically, 80% had RUQ tenderness and 52.4% epigastric tenderness. UGI endoscopy found 35.4% pathology, 28.2% were active, and comprised acute gastritis (27.4%), peptic ulcers (4.8%), duodenitis (3.2%) and oesophagitis (2.4%). Twelve patients had more than one pathology. This warranted treatment before elective cholecystectomy and justifies the practice of routine preoperative UGI endoscopy.

Efficacy of Short-Course Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Cholangitis With Positive Blood Cultures: A Retrospective Study.

Short-term treatment of acute cholangitis is sufficient for cure compared with the standard treatment duration. Whether this short-course antimicrobial therapy is effective in patients with acute cholangitis with positive blood cultures has not been fully investigated. This study assessed whether patients with acute cholangitis could achieve successful outcomes with a three-day or shorter antimicrobial treatment period, even with a positive blood culture. This single-center retrospective study involved patients with acute cholangitis, defined according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for any cause, who underwent successful biliary drainage and completed a seven-day or shorter antimicrobial treatment. Patients were categorized into six groups based on the duration of antibiotic use (short or standard) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and blood culture findings (positive, negative, or no collection). The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate, defined as no initial presenting symptoms by day 14 after biliary drainage and no recurrence or death by day 30. Secondary outcomes included a three-month recurrence rate and length of hospital stay. In total, 389 cases were selected, and 27 patients (6.9%) undergoing short-course therapy tested positive for blood culture. The clinical cure rate (n=25, 92.6%) in this group was comparable to that in the other groups. For the three-month recurrence rate (n=1, 3.7%) and median hospital stay (six days), this group's outcomes were either better or similar to those of the other groups. For cases of successful drainage in acute cholangitis, even with positive blood cultures, short-term antibiotic therapy may be appropriate.

Clinical Utility of the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for Acute Cholangitis in the Emergency Department and Comparison with Novel Markers (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Blood Nitrogen Urea-to-Albumin Ratios).

Introduction: The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG2018) is a scoring system used to recommend the clinical management of AC. However, such a scoring system must incorporate a variety of clinical outcomes of acute cholangitis (AC). In an emergency department (ED)-based setting, where efficiency and practicality are highly desired, clinicians may find the application of various parameters challenging. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) are relatively common biomarkers used to assess disease severity. This study evaluated the potential value of TG2018 scores measured in an ED to predict a variety of clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the study also compared TG2018 scores with NLR and BAR scores to demonstrate their usefulness. Methods: This retrospective observational study was performed in an ED. In total, 502 patients with AC visited the ED between January 2016 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the TG2018 scoring system measured in the ED was a predictor of intensive care, long-term hospital stays (≥14 days), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) during admission care, and endotracheal intubation (ETI). Results: The analysis included 81 patients requiring intensive care, 111 requiring long-term hospital stays (≥14 days), 49 requiring PTBD during hospitalization, and 14 requiring ETI during hospitalization. For the TG2018 score, the adjusted OR (aOR) using (1) as a reference was 23.169 (95% CI: 9.788-54.844) for (3) compared to (1). The AUC of the TG2018 for the need for intensive care was 0.850 (95% CI: 0.815-0.881) with a cutoff of >2. The AUC for long-term hospital stays did not exceed 0.7 for any of the markers. the AUC for PTBD also did not exceed 0.7 for any of the markers. The AUC for ETI was the highest for BAR at 0.870 (95% CI: 0.837-0.899) with a cutoff value of >5.2. Conclusions: The TG2018 score measured in the ED helps predict various clinical outcomes of AC. Other novel markers such as BAR and NLR are also associated, but their explanatory power is weak.

Conservative Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: An Updated Narrative Review

Conservative treatment of acute cholecystitis has been the initial treatment for acute cholecystitis, which involves the use of antibiotics to control the infection and prepare the patient for cholecystectomy. The Tokyo Guidelines have categorized patients who present with acute cholecystitis into three categories: Categories one, two and three. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard of treatment, antibiotics and percutaneous cholecystostomy play a role in the management of patients with category two and three. This review aimes to examine the role of antibiotics and percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of acute cholecystitis.

The difficult cholecystectomy: What you need to know.

This review discusses the grading of cholecystitis, the optimal timing of cholecystectomy, adopting a culture of safe cholecystectomy, understanding the common error traps that can lead to intraoperative complications, and how to avoid them. 1-28 The Tokyo Guidelines, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Nassar, and Parkland scoring systems are discussed. The patient factors, physiologic status, and operative findings that predict a difficult cholecystectomy or conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy are reviewed. With laparoscopic expertise and patient conditions that are not prohibitive, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended. This is ideally within 72 hours of admission but supported up to the seventh hospital day. The majority of bile duct injuries are due to misidentification of normal anatomy. Strasberg's four error traps and the zones of danger to avoid during a cholecystectomy are described. The review emphasizes the importance of a true critical view of safety for identification of the anatomy. In up to 15% of operations for acute cholecystitis, a critical view of safety cannot be achieved safely. Recognizing these conditions and changing your operative strategy are mandatory to avoid harm. The principles to follow for a safe cholecystectomy are discussed in detail. The cardinal message of this review is, "under challenging conditions, bile duct injuries can be minimized via either a subtotal cholecystectomy or top-down cholecystectomy if dissection in the hepatocystic triangle is avoided". 21 The most severe biliary/vascular injuries usually occur after conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indications and techniques for bailout procedures including the fenestrating and reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy are presented. Seven percent to 10% of cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis currently result in subtotal cholecystectomy. Level of evidence: III.

Preoperative difficulty factors in delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Tokyo Guidelines 2018 surgical difficulty score analysis.

Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for low-risk acute cholecystitis (AC); however, some patients undergo delayed LC (DLC) after conservative treatment. DLC, influenced by chronic inflammation, is a difficult procedure. Previous studies on LC difficulty lacked objective measures. Recently, TG18 introduced a novel 25 findings difficulty score, which objectively assesses intraoperative factors. The purpose of this study was to use the difficulty score proposed in TG18 to identify and investigate the predictors of preoperative high-difficulty cases of DLC for AC. We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with DLC after conservative AC treatment. The surgical difficulty of DLC was evaluated using a difficulty score. Based on previous studies, the highest scores in each category were categorized as grades A-C. The severity of AC was mild in 51 patients and moderate in 49. Surgical outcomes revealed a distribution of difficulty scores, with grade C indicating high difficulty, showing significant differences in operative time, blood loss, achieving a critical view of safety, bailout procedures, and postoperative hospital stay compared with grades A and B. Regarding the preoperative risk factors, multivariate analysis identified age >61 years (p = .008), body mass index >27.0 kg/m2 (p = .007), and gallbladder wall thickness >6.2 mm (p = .001) as independent risk factors for grade C in DLC. The difficulty score proposed in TG18 provides an objective framework for evaluating surgical difficulty, allowing for more accurate risk assessments and improved preoperative planning in DLC for AC.

The Role of Different Systemic Inflammatory Indexes Derived from Complete Blood Count in Differentiating Acute from Chronic Calculus Cholecystitis and Predicting Its Severity.

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the different Complete blood count-derived systemic inflammation indexes, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and neutrophil to lymphocyte × platelet ratio (NLPR) in differential diagnosing the chronic calculus cholecystitis (CCC) and the acute calculus cholecystitis (ACC), as well as determining the severity of ACC. 105 CCC and 88 ACC patients were enrolled. NLR, PLR, SII, and NLPR were evaluated in both cohorts as well as in different severity levels of ACC. The severity of ACC was determined based on the Tokyo Guidelines. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Univariate/multivariate regression analyses were conducted. The levels of NLR, PLR, SII, and NLPR were significantly higher in the ACC group compared to the CCC group. The optimal cutoff values for NLR, PLR, SII, and NLPR were determined to be 3.89, 144.7, 896.8, and 0.031 respectively. NLR>3.89 demonstrates the highest predictive capability with an AUC of 0.801 and a sensitivity of 72.73%. Multivariate analysis showed that NLR>3.89 (OR: 4.169, p = 0.004) and NLPR>0.031 (OR: 4.304, p = 0.005) were dominant in distinguishing ACC from CCC. In ACC patients, the levels of NLR, SII, and NLPR were significantly higher in the Moderate to Severe-degree ACC (MS-ACC) group than in Mild-Degree ACC (M-ACC). NLPR > 0.044 exhibited the highest predictive ability with an AUC of 0.778 and a specificity of 91.67%. Multivariate analysis showed that NLR>6.399 (OR: 10.308, p = 0.000) was a possible independent prognostic factor for accessing the severity of ACC. Systemic inflammation indexes can be useful in predicting the risk of ACC and MS-ACC. NLR demonstrates the best distinguishing power and sensitivity for distinguishing ACC from CCC, while NLPR shows the best predictive power and specificity for predicting the severity of ACC.

Evaluation of the Validity of Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis Based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018.

We evaluated the validity of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) as a bridging therapy prior to elective Lap-C for the patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap-C) for patients with AC, however, some patients require the preoperative drainage because of inadequate for early Lap-C du to background and comorbidities. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using data from our hospital records from 2018-2021. In total, 71 cases of 61 patients with AC underwent ETGBD. The technical success rate was 85.9%. Patients in the failure group had more complicated branching of the cystic duct. The length of time until feeding was started and until WBC levels normalized, and the length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the success group. The median waiting period for surgery was 39 days in the ETGBD success cases. The median operating time, amount of bleeding, and length of postoperative hospital stay were 134 min, 83.2g, and 4 days, respectively. In patients who underwent Lap-C, the waiting period for surgery and the operating time were similar between the ETGBD success and failure groups. However, the temporary discharge period after drainage and the length of postoperative hospital stay were significantly longer in the patients with ETGBD failure. Our study revealed that ETGBD has equivalent efficacy prior to elective Lap-C despite some challenges that lower its success rate. Preoperativ ETGBD can improve patient quality of life by eliminating the need for a drainage tube.