To Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Research Articles

Adverse cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with JAK inhibitors: An analysis of postmarketing spontaneous safety reports

ObjectivesThe ORAL Surveillance trial, a postmarketing safety clinical trial, found an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients treated with Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. However, additional studies yielded mixed results and data on other JAK inhibitors are limited. MethodsA retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) to assess reporting of adverse cardiovascular events following treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients between January 2015 and June 2023. To identify disproportionately increased reporting, an adjusted reporting odds ratio (adj.ROR) was calculated with a multivariable logistic regression model. ResultsWe identified safety reports of 75,407 RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, n = 52,181; upadacitinib, n = 21,006; baricitinib, n = 2,220) and 303,278 patients treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and tocilizumab). The mean age was 61.2(±12) and 59.0(±13), respectively; 82 % and 81 % were women. Compared to bDMARDs, JAK inhibitors were associated with an increased reporting of VTE [n = 1,393, adj.ROR=2.11 (1.97−2.25)], stroke [n = 973, adj.ROR=1.25 (1.16−1.34)], ischemic heart disease [IHD, n = 999, adj.ROR=1.23 (1.13−1.33)], peripheral edema [n = 2699, adj.ROR=1.22 (1.17−1.28)], and tachyarrhythmias [n = 370, adj.ROR=1.15 (1.00–1.33)]. Most of the events occurred in the first year after treatment initiation. When different JAK inhibitors were compared, VTE, stroke, and IHD were more frequently reported with upadacitinib and baricitinib than tofacitinib. When stratified by age category, all safety signals were statistically significant in patients aged≤65 years. ConclusionIn this global postmarketing study, JAK inhibitors are associated with increased reporting of VTE, stroke, IHD, and tachyarrhythmias. These adverse events were reported following all JAK inhibitors that were studied, suggesting a class effect.

P106 Do high rheumatoid factor titres impact response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors? Comparison of certolizumab pegol and adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and high titres of rheumatoid factor: a post hoc analysis of a phase 4 trial.

Abstract Background/Aims In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), high rheumatoid factor (RF) titres are considered a poor prognostic factor and are associated with higher disease activity, risk of radiographic progression and decreased response to TNF inhibitors (TNFis). Recent data suggests that patients with RA and high RF titre may achieve and maintain greater clinical improvement with TNFis without a crystallisable fragment (Fc) compared to TNFis with an Fc. In this analysis of the EXXELERATE trial, we assessed efficacy outcomes of certolizumab pegol (CZP), a PEGylated Fc-free TNFi, versus adalimumab (ADA; Fc-containing TNFi) in patients with RA and high RF titres. Methods The phase 4 EXXELERATE trial (NCT01500278) compared the efficacy and safety of CZP to ADA. Patients were randomised 1:1 to CZP 200 mg every two weeks (Q2W) plus methotrexate (MTX) or ADA 40 mg Q2W plus MTX. At Week 12 (Wk), patients were classified as responders or non-responders; non-responders were switched to the other TNFi with possible follow-up to Wk104. Here, we report drug plasma concentrations, mean disease activity score (DAS)28-CRP score and proportion of patients achieving low disease activity (LDA; threshold: DAS28-CRP ≤2.7) to Wk104. Results are stratified by RF titre quartile (≤Q3: ≤203 IU/mL; >Q3: >203 IU/mL; measured by Roche Tina-quant®) and reported as observed data. Results Baseline data by RF quartile were available for 453 CZP-randomised patients (≤Q3: n = 334; >Q3: n = 119) and 454 ADA-randomised patients (≤Q3: n = 347; >Q3 n = 107). Baseline characteristics were similar between CZP- and ADA-randomised patients across the RF titre quartiles. At Wk12, 66 CZP-treated patients switched to ADA and 59 ADA-treated patients switched to CZP. At Wk104, mean ADA concentrations were 22.9% lower in patients with RF >Q3 (mean [SD] 4.8 [3.0]) vs those with RF ≤Q3 (6.2 [4.0]); in CZP-treated patients, this difference was smaller (13.0%) in patients with RF >Q3 (23.3 [15.4]) vs those with RF ≤Q3 (26.7 [13.1]). For patients in RF ≤Q3, mean DAS28-CRP scores were similar between CZP- and ADA-treated patients through Wks0-104 (mean [SD] DAS28 at Wk104: 2.48 [1.18] CZP vs 2.49 [1.14] ADA). However, for patients in RF >Q3, mean [SD] DAS28-CRP scores were nominally lower in CZP- vs ADA-treated patients (Wk104: 2.50 [1.18] CZP vs 2.93 [1.22] ADA). A similar pattern was observed for the proportion of patients achieving LDA at Wk104 (≤Q3: 64.8% CZP vs 65.1% ADA; >Q3: 65.7% CZP vs 48.3% ADA). Conclusion CZP-treated patients with RA and high titre RF had similar drug concentrations and clinical responses to patients with RA and low titre RF, a pattern not observed in ADA-treated patients. These data, together with previous reports where CZP showed consistent efficacy irrespective of baseline RF titre, suggest CZP may be a suitable therapy for patients with RA and high RF titre. Disclosure J.S. Smolen: Honoraria; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis and Roche. Other; Editor of Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Co-editor of Rheumatology 7E/8E, Convenor of EULAR Task Forces and T2T Task Forces. P.C. Taylor: Consultancies; AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; Galapagos. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Pfizer, Taiho, Taisho. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Pfizer, Taiho and Taisho. Grants/research support; Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Taisho. C. Cara: Shareholder/stock ownership; UCB Pharma. Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. B. Lauwerys: Shareholder/stock ownership; UCB Pharma. Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. R. Xavier: Consultancies; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Organon, UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Organon, and UCB Pharma. J.R. Curtis: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Corrona, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Corrona, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma. T.R. Mikuls: Consultancies; Horizon Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB Pharma. Royalties; Elsevier, Wolters Kluwer Health (UpToDate). Grants/research support; Horizon Therapeutics. M. Weinblatt: Consultancies; AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Aqtual, BMS, CorEvitas, Eli Lilly, GSK, Gilead, Horizon, Johnson and Johnson, Prometheus, Pfizer, Rani, Revolo, Sanofi, Scipher, Sci Rhom, Set Point, UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Aqtual, BMS, Janssen.

Risk of Paradoxical Eczema in Patients Receiving Biologics for Psoriasis

Biologics used for plaque psoriasis have been reported to be associated with an atopic dermatitis (AD) phenotype, or paradoxical eczema, in some patients. The risk factors for this are unknown. To explore risk of paradoxical eczema by biologic class and identify factors associated with paradoxical eczema. This prospective cohort study used data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register for adults treated with biologics for plaque psoriasis who were seen at multicenter dermatology clinics in the UK and Ireland. Included participants were registered and had 1 or more follow-up visits between September 2007 and December 2022. Duration of exposure to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, interleukin (IL) 17 inhibitors, IL-12/23 inhibitors, or IL-23 inhibitors until paradoxical eczema onset, treatment discontinuation, last follow-up, or death. Incidence rates of paradoxical eczema, paradoxical eczema risk by biologic class, and the association of demographic and clinical variables with risk of paradoxical eczema were assessed using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Of 56 553 drug exposures considered, 24 997 from 13 699 participants were included. The 24 997 included exposures (median age, 46 years [IQR, 36-55 years]; 57% male) accrued a total exposure time of 81 441 patient-years. A total of 273 exposures (1%) were associated with paradoxical eczema. The adjusted incidence rates were 1.22 per 100 000 person-years for IL-17 inhibitors, 0.94 per 100 000 person-years for TNF inhibitors, 0.80 per 100 000 person-years for IL-12/23 inhibitors, and 0.56 per 100 000 person-years for IL-23 inhibitors. Compared with TNF inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of paradoxical eczema (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81), and there was no association of IL-17 inhibitors (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.42) or IL-12/23 inhibitors (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.16) with risk of paradoxical eczema. Increasing age (HR, 1.02 per year; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) and history of AD (HR, 12.40; 95% CI, 6.97-22.06) or hay fever (HR, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.49-9.53) were associated with higher risk of paradoxical eczema. There was a lower risk in males (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.78). In this study, in biologic-treated patients with psoriasis, paradoxical eczema risk was lowest in patients receiving IL-23 inhibitors. Increasing age, female sex, and history of AD or hay fever were associated with higher risk of paradoxical eczema. The overall incidence of paradoxical eczema was low. Further study is needed to replicate these findings.

Serum interα-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 may be an anti-inflammatory marker reflecting disease risk, activity and treatment outcome of ankylosing spondylitis

Interα-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (ITIH4) modulates inflammation and immunity, which take part in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The current research intended to discover the clinical value of serum ITIH4 quantification for AS management. Serum ITIH4 among 80 AS patients before current treatment initiation (baseline) at weeks (W) 4, 8 and 12 after treatment was detected by ELISA. Serum ITIH4 from 20 disease controls (DCs) and 20 healthy controls (HCs) was detected. ITIH4 expression was lower in AS patients than in DCs (p = 0.002) and HCs (p < 0.001). Among AS patients, ITIH4 was negatively associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = −0.311, p = 0.005), bath AS disease activity index (BASDAI) (r = −0.223, p = 0.047), total pack pain (r = −0.273, p = 0.014) and AS disease activity score (ASDAS) (CRP) (r = −0.265, p = 0.018). Meanwhile, ITIH4 was negatively related to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (r = −0.364, p = 0.001), interleukin (IL)-1β (r = −0.251, p = 0.025), IL-6 (r = −0.292, p = 0.009) and IL-17A (r = −0.254, p = 0.023). After treatment, the assessment of the spondylitis arthritis international society 40 response rate was 28.7% at W4, 46.3% at W8 and 55.0% at W12; ITIH4 showed an increasing trend from baseline to W12 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ITIH4 at W8 (p = 0.020) and W12 (p = 0.035), but not at baseline or W4 (both p > 0.05), was enhanced in response patients vs. nonresponse patients. Additionally, ITIH4 at W12 was increased in AS patients receiving TNF inhibitors vs. those receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (p = 0.024). Serum ITIH4 increases after treatment, and its augmentation is correlated with lower disease activity, decreased inflammation and enhanced treatment response in AS patients.

Tolerability and comparative effectiveness of TNF-, IL-17-, and IL-23(p19) inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: A target trial emulation study.

To compare tolerability and effectiveness of two different classes of biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs; interleukin (IL)-17- and IL-23(p19) inhibitors) relative to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the drug survival rates and treatment outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We emulated a target trial on comparative effectiveness using observational data from a prospective cohort study based on the Parker Institute's PsA cohort - the PIPA cohort. All patients underwent interview and clinical examination programme at baseline and at follow-up visits at four and twelve months. The primary endpoint, drug survival, was assessed up to 12 months from baseline. We estimated hazard ratios from proportional hazards model and used propensity score adjustment in an attempt to deconfound and emulate a random treatment assignment. We included a total of 109 patients in the intention-to-monitor population at baseline initiating either TNFi (75 patients), IL17i (26 patients), or IL23(19)i (8 patients). Hazard ratios in the propensity adjusted model comparing IL-17i and IL-23(p19)i to TNFi were 1.36 (95% CI 0.59-3.14) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.10-3.24), respectively. TNFi and IL-17i had comparable effects regarding response rates and changes in clinical outcomes after 12 months, whereas IL-23(p19)i tended to perform better overall. No decisive differences between drugs were observed at group level regarding drug survival and clinical outcomes after 12 months. TNFi, IL-17i, and IL-23(p19)i may all be considered equally effective in the treatment of patients with PsA, advocating for investigating more in personalised treatment strategies.

Effect of guselkumab on serum biomarkers in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the COSMOS phase 3b study

BackgroundGuselkumab is a selective interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor targeting the IL-23p19 subunit. In the phase 3b COSMOS trial, guselkumab demonstrated efficacy in treating participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response (IR; lack of efficacy or intolerance) to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).MethodsAdults with active PsA (≥ 3 swollen joints, ≥ 3 tender joints) and IR to one or two TNFi (TNFi-IR) were randomized 2:1 to guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) or placebo➔guselkumab Q8W at Week 24 with possible early escape at Week 16. Levels of serum cytokines, including interferon γ (IFNγ), IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα); T helper 17 (Th17) effector cytokines IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22; and acute phase proteins C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, and serum amyloid A (SAA), were assessed and compared with demographically matched healthy controls; guselkumab pharmacodynamics through Week 24 were also assessed. Associations between baseline biomarker levels and 1) baseline disease activity (28-joint disease activity score using CRP [DAS28-CRP], psoriasis area and severity index [PASI], and % body surface area [BSA] affected by psoriasis) and 2) clinical response (including ≥ 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria [ACR20] response) at Week 24 were assessed.ResultsBaseline serum levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, TNFα, and IFNγ were significantly higher in COSMOS TNFi-IR participants than in healthy controls. Baseline IL-6, CRP, and SAA levels were associated with baseline DAS28-CRP. IL-17A and IL-17F levels were associated with baseline PASI score and psoriasis BSA. Baseline swollen or tender joint counts did not associate with baseline biomarker levels. At Week 24, significant decreases from baseline in CRP, SAA, IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 levels were seen in guselkumab-, but not placebo-, treated participants. IL-17F and IL-22 levels at Week 24 in guselkumab-treated participants did not significantly differ from those of healthy controls. Guselkumab-treated participants achieving ACR20 response at Week 24 exhibited higher baseline IL-22 and IFNγ levels versus nonresponders.ConclusionsResults from COSMOS participants with active, TNFi-IR PsA suggest guselkumab reduces levels of effector cytokines associated with the IL-23/IL-17 pathway, including those associated with baseline arthritis and skin disease activity.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03796858.

Serum CDC42 is increased during tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment, and its elevation correlates with satisfactory treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Our previous study discovered that cell division control protein 42 (CDC42) correlated with decreased disease activity and risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA), along with repressed T helper type 17 cell differentiation. This study aimed to further estimate the longitudinal change of serum CDC42 and its association with treatment outcomes to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in RA. CDC42 was detected in serum by ELISA at week (W)0, W6, W12, and W24 in 88 RA patients undergoing TNFi treatment, and after enrollment in 20 disease controls (DCs) and 20 healthy controls (HCs). CDC42 was lower in RA patients compared with DCs and HCs (both p < .001); meanwhile, it negatively related to C-reactive protein (p = .011) and DAS28 score (p = .006). Regarding TNFi type, 40.9%, 33.0%, 17.0%, and 9.1% of patients received adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, and infliximab, respectively. Notably, CDC42 was increased from W0 to W24 in RA patients receiving TNFi treatment (p < .001), also in patients receiving adalimumab (p < .001), etanercept (p < .001), golimumab (p < .001), and infliximab (p = .001). Furthermore, CDC42 at W24 was higher in patients with a clinical response to TNFi treatment compared with those without (p = .023); CDC42 at W12 (p = .027) and W24 (p = .002) was elevated in patients with clinical low disease activity in response to TNFi treatment versus those without; whereas CDC42 at W12 (p = .074) and W24 (p = .068) only showed an increasing trend in patients with clinical remission with TNFi treatment, but did not achieve statistical significance. Circulating CDC42 is elevated during TNFi administration; its increase reflects good 24-week TNFi treatment responses in RA patients.

Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis.

Skin manifestations are common in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and may precede axial involvement. Multidisciplinary management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) is essential. Combined dermatology-rheumatology clinics are established for early recognition of the disease, comorbidities and a comprehensive treatment approach. Treatment options for axSpA are limited because conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and glucocorticoids are ineffective for axial symptoms. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) that decrease transduction signalling to the nucleus, resulting in a reduced inflammatory response. Currently, tofacitinib and upadacitinib are approved for treating axSpA in patients with inadequate response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Upadacitinib has shown efficacy in non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA), suggesting that JAKi are efficacious across the spectrum of axSpA. The availability of JAKi has opened more options for patients with active axSpA based on the efficacy data and the ease of administration.

Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with targeted synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A multi-centre cohort study.

This study aimed to compare the cardiovascular safety of interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i) and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). We conducted a retrospective cohort study using population-based electronic databases from Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. We identified newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received b/tsDMARDs first time. We followed patients from b/tsDMARD initiation to the earliest outcome (acute coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, venous thromboembolism and systemic embolism) or censoring events (death, transformation of b/tsDMARDs on different targets, discontinuation and study end). Using TNFi as reference, we applied generalized linear regression for the incidence rate ratio estimation adjusted by age, sex, disease duration and comorbidities. Random effects meta-analysis was used for pooled analysis. We identified 8689 participants for this study. Median (interquartile range) follow-up years were 1.45 (2.77) in Hong Kong, 1.72 (2.39) in Taiwan and 1.45 (2.46) in Korea. Compared to TNFi, the adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of IL-6i in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea are 0.99 (0.25, 3.95), 1.06 (0.57, 1.98) and 1.05 (0.59, 1.86) and corresponding aIRR of JAKi are 1.50 (0.42, 5.41), 0.60 (0.26, 1.41), and 0.81 (0.38, 1.74), respectively. Pooled aIRRs showed no significant risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) associated with IL-6i (1.05 [0.70, 1.57]) nor JAKi (0.80 [0.48, 1.35]) compared to TNFi. There was no difference in the risk of CVE among RA patients initiated with IL-6i, or JAKi compared to TNFi. The finding is consistent in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea.

E039 Association between ethnicity and initial response to TNF inhibitors in people with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA)

Abstract Background/Aims Little is known about the association between ethnicity and response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study examines the association between self-reported ethnicity and DAS28 response after 6 months of treatment in patients starting their first TNFi using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA. Methods 14133 RA patients with self-reported ethnicity starting their first TNFi were included. Due to a very low proportion of non-white patients, ethnicity was divided into white or non-white for analysis. Outcomes included the change in disease activity using DAS28, the proportion of patients who achieved DAS28 remission and EULAR response at month 6. Adjusted regression models appropriate to outcome were used to compare between the two groups. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results Of 14133 patients starting TNFi with recorded ethnicity, only 607 (4.3%) recorded themselves as non-white (389 Asian, 134 Black, 57 Mixed ethnicity and 27 other) (Table). At start of TNFi, non-white patients were younger (non-white vs. white: mean 51 vs. 57 years; p &amp;lt; 0.001), with shorter disease duration (median 8 vs. 10 years; p &amp;lt; 0.001), higher proportion of females (86% vs. 76%; p &amp;lt; 0.001) and fewer current cigarette smokers (9% vs. 20%; p &amp;lt; 0.001). Non-white patients had lesser improvement in DAS28 at month 6 (adjusted regression coefficient (95% confidence interval (95%CI)): 0.3 (0.04-0.5)). However, using the white patients as a reference, non-white patients were not associated with the achievement of DAS28 remission (adjusted odds ratio (95%CI): 0.7 (0.5-1.1)) or EULAR response (aOR (95%CI): 0.8 (0.7-1.0)) at month 6. Conclusion Recruitment to the BSRBR-RA of non-white patients was exceptionally low compared to expected population distribution - the reasons for this are not immediately evident. Among those recruited, there were no significant differences observed in initial treatment response although non-white patients were younger, more likely to be female, had shorter disease duration and less likely to be smokers. Further evaluation into ways to both increase representativeness in our national RA treatment register and influence of ethnic differences on longer term outcomes with biologic therapies is warranted. Disclosure M. Tsoi: None. R.S. Andev: Other; R.S.A. reports speaker fees from Novartis. L. Kearsley-Fleet: None. K. Watson: None. S. Dubey: Honoraria; S.D. reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. Other; S.D. reports speaker fees from Janssen. K. Kumar: None. A. Moorthy: Honoraria; A.M. reports honoraria from Eli-Lilly and UCB. Other; A.M. reports speaker fees from Novartis and Galapagos. M. Gupta: None. A.O. Adebajo: None. K.L. Hyrich: Honoraria; K.L.H. reports honoraria from Abbvie. Grants/research support; K.L.M reports grant income from Pfizer and BMS.

Comparative effectiveness of TNF inhibitor vs IL-6 receptor inhibitor as monotherapy or combination therapy with methotrexate in biologic-experienced patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis from the CorEvitas RA Registry

ObjectiveRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with high disease activity and inadequate response/intolerance to methotrexate have shown interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri) to be superior to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as monotherapy. This observational study aimed to compare the effectiveness of TNFi vs IL-6Ri as mono- or combination therapy in biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts) -experienced RA patients with moderate/high disease activity.MethodsEligible b/ts-experienced patients from the CorEvitas RA registry were categorized as TNFi and IL-6Ri initiators, with subgroups initiating as mono- or combination therapy. Mixed-effects regression models evaluated the impact of treatment on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), patient-reported outcomes, and disproportionate pain (DP). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted effects were reported.ResultsPatients initiating IL-6Ri (n = 286) vs TNFi monotherapy (n = 737) were older, had a longer RA history and higher baseline CDAI, and were more likely to initiate as third-line therapy; IL-6Ri (n = 401) vs TNFi (n = 1315) combination therapy initiators had higher baseline CDAI and were more likely to initiate as third-line therapy. No significant differences were noted in the outcomes between TNFi and IL-6Ri initiators (as mono- or combination therapy).ConclusionThis observational study showed no significant differences in outcomes among b/ts-experienced TNFi vs IL-6Ri initiators, as either mono- or combination therapy. These findings were in contrast with the previous RCTs in biologic-naïve patients and could be explained by the differences in the patient characteristics included in this study. Further studies are needed to help understand the reasons for this discrepancy in the real-world b/ts-experienced population.Key Points• Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often require switching between biologics or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to achieve their treatment target.• Head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in biologic-naïve RA patients with high disease activity and inadequate response/intolerance to methotrexate have shown interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri) to be superior to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as monotherapy; however, there are no RCTs comparing these therapies in a population previously treated with b/tsDMARDs (i.e., b/ts-experienced patients).• This observational study compared the effectiveness of TNFi vs IL-6Ri (as mono- or combination therapy) in b/ts-experienced RA patients with moderate or high disease activity and found no significant differences in clinical outcomes for the two treatments.• A discrepancy is noted between our study and RCTs, which have shown superiority of IL-6Ri therapy (albeit in biologic-naïve patients). Further analyses may help elucidate the reason for this discrepancy in the real-world b/ts-experienced population.

Interferon-alpha 1 expression indicates the disease activity and response of patients with ankylosing spondylitis to anti-TNF-α treatment.

This study aimed to investigate whether interferon-alpha 1 (IFNA1) is predictive of Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) progression and treatment response to Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). Data of 50 AS patients receiving TNFi for 24 weeks were retrospectively analysed. AS patients who reached the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 response at the W24 were classified as responders to TNFi treatment; otherwise, they were classified as nonresponders. Human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (HFLS) isolated from AS patients (AS-HFLS) were used for in vitro validation. When the IFNA1 expression level was used to diagnose AS patients, an area under the curve of 0.895 was yielded (P < .001). Pearson correlation analysis showed negative correlations between IFNA1 expression, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, Bath AS Disease Activity Index scores, AS Disease Activity Score with CRP, and the production of inflammatory cytokines. An increased IFNA1 expression level was found to be associated with a better treatment response to TNFi. IFNA1 overexpression could protect HFLS against inflammatory response in the setting of AS. Blood IFNA1 deficiency is correlated with inflammatory cytokine production and disease activity and is indicative of unsatisfied response to TNFi treatment in AS patients.

Perioperative treatment with TNF inhibitors does not affect survival of total hip arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis: A registry-based cohort study

ObjectivesAim of this study was to investigate the effect of perioperative exposure to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) on the long-term survival of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in inflammatory arthritis patients from a large regional register of arthroplasty procedures (RIPO). MethodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of data from RIPO for THAs performed between 2008 and 2019. After extraction of the procedures of interest from the RIPO dataset, cross-matching with administrative databases were used to identify patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), primary osteoarthritis (OA), and treatments of interest. Three different cohorts of patients were identified: perioperative TNFi-treated patients (6 months before or after the surgery), perioperative non-bDMARD/tsDMARD (biologic or targeted-synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs), and OA. ResultsAt an average follow-up of 5 years, survival rates (using any revision surgery as an endpoint) were not significantly different when perioperative TNFi users and non-bDMARD/tsDMARD patients were compared (p = 0.713), and between TNFi-treated and OA controls (p = 0.123). At the latest available follow-up, 2.5% patients in the TNFi cohort, 3% in the non-bDMARD/tsDMARD cohort, and 0.8% in the OA cohort underwent revision surgery. No significant differences were found comparing the risk of postoperative infection or aseptic loosening among groups. ConclusionRisk of revision surgery is not increased in patients with inflammatory arthritis perioperatively exposed to TNFi. Our results support the long-term safety of this class of molecules on survival of prosthetic implants.

Characterisation of gut microbiota composition in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and its modulation by TNF inhibitor treatment

ObjectiveTo assess whether gut microbiota composition is associated with patient characteristics and may have predictive value on the response to TNF inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA).MethodsThe study involved...

Factors associated with the retention of secukinumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in real-world practice: results from a retrospective study (FORSYA)

BackgroundSecukinumab efficacy and retention data are emerging in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in real-world settings. However, limited data are available on the predictive factors that affect the retention rate....

Pre-treatment calprotectin (MRP8/14) provides no added value to testing CRP alone in terms of predicting response to TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in a post hoc analysis

ObjectivesThe inflammatory protein calprotectin (MRP8/14) has been identified as a promising biomarker of treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to test MRP8/14 as a biomarker of response...

A tissue atlas of ulcerative colitis revealing evidence of sex-dependent differences in disease-driving inflammatory cell types and resistance to TNF inhibitor therapy.

Although literature suggests that resistance to TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is partially linked to immune cell populations in the inflamed region, there is still substantial uncertainty underlying the relevant spatial context. Here, we used the highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging technology CODEX to create a publicly browsable tissue atlas of inflammation in 42 tissue regions from 29 patients with UC and 5 healthy individuals. We analyzed 52 biomarkers on 1,710,973 spatially resolved single cells to determine cell types, cell-cell contacts, and cellular neighborhoods. We observed that cellular functional states are associated with cellular neighborhoods. We further observed that a subset of inflammatory cell types and cellular neighborhoods are present in patients with UC with TNFi treatment, potentially indicating resistant niches. Last, we explored applying convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to our dataset with respect to patient clinical variables. We note concerns and offer guidelines for reporting CNN-based predictions in similar datasets.

Insurance Status and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Initiation Among Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in the CARRA Registry.

Prompt escalation to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) is recommended for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and ongoing disease activity despite treatment with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs). It is unknown whether these recommendations are equitably followed for children with different insurance types. We assessed the association of insurance coverage on the odds and timing of TNFi use. We conducted a retrospective study of children with newly diagnosed JIA in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. We compared the odds of starting a TNFi in the first year and time from cDMARD to TNFi initiation between those with public and private insurance. We identified 1086 children with new JIA diagnoses. Publicly insured children had significantly higher active joint counts and parent/patient global assessment scores at the enrollment visit. They were also more likely to have polyarticular arthritis compared to those with private insurance. Odds of any TNFi use in the first year did not differ between publicly and privately insured children. Publicly insured children were escalated from cDMARD to TNFi more quickly than privately insured children. Children who were publicly insured had more severe disease and polyarticular involvement at registry enrollment compared to those who were privately insured. Whereas overall TNFi use did not differ between children with different insurance types, publicly insured children were escalated more quickly, consistent with their increased disease severity. Further research is needed to determine why insurance coverage type is associated with disease severity, including how other socioeconomic factors affect presentation to care.

Female Sex, Age, and Unfavorable Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results of Statistical and Artificial Intelligence-Based Data Analyses of a National Multicenter Prospective Registry.

Real-world studies are needed to identify factors associated with response to biologic therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). The objective was to assess sex differences in response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and to explore possible risk factors associated with TNFi efficacy. A total of 969 patients with axial SpA (315 females, 654 males) enrolled in the BIOBADASER registry (2000-2019) who initiated a TNFi (first, second, or further lines) were studied. Statistical and artificial intelligence (AI)-based data analyses were used to explore the association of sex differences and other factors to TNFi response, using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), to calculate the BASDAI50, with an improvement of at least 50% of the BASDAI score, and using the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, calculated using the C-reactive protein level (ASDAS-CRP). Females had a lower probability of reaching a BASDAI50 response with a first line TNFi treatment at the second year of follow-up (P=0.018) and a lesser reduction of the ASDAS-CRP at this time point. The logistic regression model showed lower BASDAI50 responses to TNFi in females (P=0.05). Other factors, such as older age (P=0.004), were associated with unfavorable responses. The AI data analyses reinforced the idea that age at the beginning of the treatment was the main factor associated with an unfavorable response. The combination of age with other clinical characteristics (female sex or cardiovascular risk factors and events) potentially contributed to an unfavorable response to TNFi. In this national multicenter registry, female sex was associated with less response to a first-line TNFi by the second year of follow-up. A higher age at the start of the TNFi was the main factor associated with an unfavorable response to TNFi.

Prediction of response to anti-TNF treatment using laboratory biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

ObjectivesIn this systematic review, we aim to identify laboratory biomarkers that predict response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsEMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL)...