TNFi-treated Patients Research Articles

Suppressed IgG4 class switching in dupilumab- and TNF inhibitor-treated patients after mRNA vaccination.

The noninflammatory immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) is linked to tolerance and is unique to humans. Although poorly understood, prolonged antigenic stimulation and IL-4-signaling along the T helper 2-axis may be instrumental in IgG4 class switching. Recently, repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination has been linked to IgG4 skewing. Although widely used immunosuppressive drugs have been shown to only moderately affect humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, the effect on IgG4 switching has not been investigated. Here we study the impact of such immunosuppressive drugs, including the IL-4 receptor-blocking antibody dupilumab, on IgG4 skewing upon repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Receptor-binding domain (RBD) specific antibody responses were longitudinally measured in 600 individuals, including patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) and/or methotrexate (MTX), dupilumab, and healthy/untreated controls, after repeated mRNA vaccination. We observed a substantial increase in the proportion of RBD-specific IgG4 antibodies (median 21%) in healthy/untreated controls after third vaccination. This IgG4 skewing was profoundly reduced in dupilumab-treated patients (<1%). Unexpectedly, an equally strong suppression of IgG4 skewing was observed in TNFi-treated patients (<1%), whereas MTX caused a modest reduction (7%). RBD-specific total IgG levels were hardly affected by these immunosuppressive drugs. Minimal skewing was observed, when primary vaccination was adenoviral vector-based. Our results imply a critical role for IL-4/IL-13 as well as TNF invivo IgG4 class switching. These novel findings advance our understanding of IgG4 class switch dynamics, and may benefit humoral tolerance induction strategies, treatment of IgG4 pathologies and mRNA vaccine optimization.

Improvement in patient-reported outcomes and work productivity following 3-year ustekinumab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from the PsABio real-world study

BackgroundTo evaluate the real-world effect of the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab or of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and their association with effectiveness endpoints in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients over 3 years.MethodsIn PsABio (NCT02627768), a prospective, observational study, patients with PsA that were prescribed first- to third-line ustekinumab or a TNFi, and remained on that drug for 3 years, were analysed for change in baseline in PROs (EuroQol-5 dimensions health state VAS [EQ-5D VAS], 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire [PsAID-12; range 0–10], Work Productivity and Activity Impairment for Psoriatic Arthritis questionnaire [WPAI; results expressed as a percentage for each domain]), and the association between PROs and WPAI with effectiveness endpoints, clinical disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (cDAPSA), low disease activity (LDA)/remission, minimal disease activity (MDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA).ResultsIn 437 patients (mean age 49.1 years, 47.8% female), at 3 years, ustekinumab and TNFi treatment led to comparable improvements in EQ-5D VAS; mean change from baseline (95% confidence intervals [CI]) was 11.0 (6.5; 15.4) and 18.9 (14.0; 23.9), respectively. Both groups improved PsAID-12 after 3 years; mean change from baseline (95% CI) was −2.9 (−3.2; −2.5) and −3.5 (−3.9; −3.2), respectively. At baseline, due to their PsA, TNFi-treated patients had lower work productivity compared to ustekinumab-treated patients; mean productivity reduction (95% CI) was 58.8 [52.4; 65.2] and 43.3 [35.6; 51.1]. Over 3 years, TNFi-treated patients had a greater improvement in work productivity compared to ustekinumab-treated patients, ultimately leaving work productivity to be comparable between groups; mean improvement (95% CI) was 44.5% (38.4; 50.6) and 24.9% (15.8; 34.0), respectively. A similar trend was observed in activity impairment. Patients in both treatment groups who achieved effectiveness endpoints, cDAPSA LDA/remission, MDA, and VLDA had greater improvement in PROs and WPAI than patients who did not achieve these endpoints.ConclusionsAt 3 years, improvements in PROs following ustekinumab or TNFi treatment were generally comparable; however, TNFi-treated patients achieved a greater improvement in work productivity, although this group started from a lower baseline. Achievement of effectiveness endpoints, independent of treatment group, also improved PROs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02627768. Registered on 11 December 2015

Perioperative treatment with TNF inhibitors does not affect survival of total hip arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis: A registry-based cohort study

ObjectivesAim of this study was to investigate the effect of perioperative exposure to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) on the long-term survival of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in inflammatory arthritis patients from a large regional register of arthroplasty procedures (RIPO). MethodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of data from RIPO for THAs performed between 2008 and 2019. After extraction of the procedures of interest from the RIPO dataset, cross-matching with administrative databases were used to identify patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), primary osteoarthritis (OA), and treatments of interest. Three different cohorts of patients were identified: perioperative TNFi-treated patients (6 months before or after the surgery), perioperative non-bDMARD/tsDMARD (biologic or targeted-synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs), and OA. ResultsAt an average follow-up of 5 years, survival rates (using any revision surgery as an endpoint) were not significantly different when perioperative TNFi users and non-bDMARD/tsDMARD patients were compared (p = 0.713), and between TNFi-treated and OA controls (p = 0.123). At the latest available follow-up, 2.5% patients in the TNFi cohort, 3% in the non-bDMARD/tsDMARD cohort, and 0.8% in the OA cohort underwent revision surgery. No significant differences were found comparing the risk of postoperative infection or aseptic loosening among groups. ConclusionRisk of revision surgery is not increased in patients with inflammatory arthritis perioperatively exposed to TNFi. Our results support the long-term safety of this class of molecules on survival of prosthetic implants.

Anti-TNF-α induced paradoxical psoriasis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review.

The approval of TNF-a inhibitors (TNFi) was a breakthrough in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Although also effective in psoriasis, drug-related adverse events of onset of psoriasiform skin lesions - paradoxical psoriasis (PP) under TNFi have been reported. We performed an electronic data search in MEDLINE via Pubmed and Cochrane library scientific databases from inception to January 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines. We assessed the distinct characteristics and frequency of risks for PP appearance in AS patients treated with different TNFi. PP was found in 0.5-1% of TNFi-treated AS patients and the latency period was 2-11 months. The safest TNFi in terms of PP induction was certolizumab, whereas the one most commonly associated with PP was infliximab. PP is an uncommon adverse reaction to TNFi treatment in AS patients and responds well to drug withdrawal. More large data studies need to be conducted though, to shed light on PP nature and management.

P061 Response to anti-α4β7 therapy in Ulcerative colitis is associated with lymphoid aggregate attrition through impaired recruitment of naïve lymphocytes

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a frontline drug for Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) that targets integrin α4β7, a gut-homing receptor. Despite significant use, the mechanism(s) of action (MOA) of VDZ remain unclear. Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from UC patients (n=43) and paired intestinal biopsies in a subset (n=12) were examined at week 0 (pre-infusion) and 14, by multiparameter flow cytometry (FC). TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-treated UC patients served as controls. Drug MOA was further examined in detail in murine models using single-cell RNA-seq, FC, conventional and immunofluorescent microscopy (IF). Photoconvertible (Kikumi) mice were used to study cellular trafficking after anti-α4β7 (DATK32) antibody (mAb) administration. Two distinct UC cohorts (n=42 and n=21 respectively) were used to correlate GI immune alterations following VDZ with mucosal healing. Results A significant decrease of colonic and ileal naïve B and T cells was noted in VDZ- but not in TNFi-treated patients (Fig 1A), while total T cell-frequencies were unchanged. Circulating gut-homing plasmablasts (β7+) were significantly decreased post-VDZ. Peyer’s patches (PP) in anti-α4β7-treated mice showed a rapid loss of cellularity associated with decreased follicular naïve B cells (Fig 1B). Single-cell RNA-seq also demonstrated a significant loss of follicular B cells, including a unique population of epithelium-associated B cells following anti-α4β7 mAb. In Kikumi mice, anti-α4β7 mAb impaired non-photoconverted follicular B cells and T cells into photoconverted PPs (Fig 1C) demonstrating that loss of PP cellularity was due to impaired cellular ingress. In VDZ-treated (but not TNFi-treated) UC patients, lymphoid aggregate (LA) size was significantly reduced in treatment responders compared to non-responders (defined by absence of histological inflammation). A distinct validation cohort further confirmed that reduced lymphoid aggregate size was associated with response to VDZ-therapy (Fig 1D). Conclusion VDZ is associated with impaired ingress of naïve B and T cells, resulting in attrition of intestinal LA. Reduced LA size is associated with VDZ response. Immune inductive site targeting represents a novel MOA of VDZ in patients with UC.

Long-term effectiveness and persistence of ustekinumab and TNF inhibitors in patients with psoriatic arthritis: final 3-year results from the PsABio real-world study

ObjectivesTo evaluate real-world persistence and effectiveness of the IL-12/23 inhibitor, ustekinumab or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) for psoriatic arthritis over 3 years.MethodsPsABio (NCT02627768), a prospective, observational study, followed...

Association between malignancy risk and Janus kinase inhibitors versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide population-based study

ObjectiveTo determine the risk of malignancy in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) compared with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis).MethodsA retrospective cohort of patients with...

Haematological malignancies in patients with psoriatic arthritis overall and treated with TNF inhibitors: a Nordic cohort study

ObjectivesTo evaluate the risk of haematological malignancies in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) overall, and in relation to treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).MethodsWe identified that patients with PsA...

Evaluation of VTE, MACE, and Serious Infections Among Patients with RA Treated with Baricitinib Compared to TNFi: A Multi-Database Study of Patients in Routine Care Using Disease Registries and Claims Databases.

The aim of this work is to evaluate baricitinib safety with respect to venous thromboembolism (VTE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and serious infection relative to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with RA from 14 real-world data sources (three disease registries, eight commercial and three government health insurance claims databases) in the United States (n = 9), Europe (n = 3), and Japan (n = 2) were analyzed using a new user active comparator design. Propensity score matching (1:1) controlled for potential confounding. Meta-analysis of incidence rate ratios (IRR) and incidence rate differences (IRD) for each outcome, from each data source was executed using modified Poisson regression and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis. Of 9013 eligible baricitinib-treated patients, 7606 were propensity score-matched with TNFi-treated patients, contributing 5879 and 6512 person-years of baricitinib and TNFi exposure, respectively. Across data sources, 97 patients (56 baricitinib) experienced VTE during follow-up, 93 experienced MACE (54 baricitinib), and 321 experienced serious infection (176 baricitinib). Overall IRRs comparing baricitinib with TNFi treatment were 1.51 (95% CI 1.10, 2.08) for VTE, 1.54 (95% CI 0.93, 2.54) for MACE, and 1.36 (95% CI 0.86, 2.13) for serious infection. IRDs for VTE, MACE, and serious infection, respectively, were 0.26 (95% CI -0.04, 0.57), 0.22 (95% CI -0.07, 0.52), and 0.57 (95% CI -0.07, 1.21) per 100 person-years greater for baricitinib than TNFi. Overall results suggest increased risk of VTE with baricitinib versus TNFi, with consistent point estimates from the two largest data sources. A numerically greater risk was observed for MACE and serious infection when comparing baricitinib versus TNFi, with different point estimates from the two largest data sources. Findings from this study and their impact on clinical practice should be considered in context of limitations and other evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of baricitinib and other Janus kinase inhibitors. EU PAS Register ( http://encepp.eu ), identifier #32271.

Patient outcomes improve when a molecular signature test guides treatment decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis

ABSTRACT Background The molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) predicts tumor necrosis factor-ɑ inhibitor (TNFi) non-response in rheumatoid arthritis. This study evaluates decision-making, validity, and utility of MSRC testing. Methods This comparative cohort study compared an MSRC-tested arm (N = 627) from the Study to Accelerate Information of Molecular Signatures (AIMS) with an external control arm (N = 2721) from US electronic health records. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Patients initiated a biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, or continued TNFi therapy. Odds ratios (ORs) for six-month response were calculated based on clinical disease activity index (CDAI) scores for low disease activity/remission (CDAI-LDA/REM), remission (CDAI-REM), and minimally important differences (CDAI-MID) . Results In MSRC-tested patients, 59% had a non-response signature and 70% received MSRC-aligned therapy . In TNFi-treated patients, the MSRC had an 88% PPV and 54% sensitivity. MSRC-guided patients were significantly (p < 0.0001) more likely to respond to b/tsDMARDs than those treated according to standard care (CDAI-LDA/REM: 36.0% vs 21.9%, OR 2.01[1.55–2.60]; CDAI-REM: 10.4% vs 3.6%, OR 3.14 [1.94–5.08]; CDAI-MID: 49.5% vs 32.8%, OR 2.01[1.58–2.55]). Conclusion MSRC clinical validity supports high clinical utility: guided treatment selection resulted in significantly superior outcomes relative to standard care; nearly three times more patients reached CDAI remission.

IL-10 Induced by mTNF Crosslinking-Mediated Reverse Signaling in a Whole Blood Assay Is Predictive of Response to TNFi Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

(1) Background: To date, the response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to the various biologic DMARD available cannot be predicted due to a lack of reliable biomarkers. Based on our preliminary work on tmTNF reverse signaling, we developed a whole-blood assay measuring tmTNF crosslinking-induced IL-10 production to predict the response to TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy. (2) Methods: This prospective study included patients with active RA. Depending on the clinical judgment of the attending rheumatologist, either therapy with a TNF or JAK inhibitor was initiated. Clinical parameters and blood samples were obtained at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy. The blood samples were collected using a newly developed whole-blood assay based on the principle of tmTNF reverse signalling. Subsequently, IL-10 was measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. (3) Results: 63 patients with RA were enrolled. In fifteen patients, TNFi therapy was initiated, while eight patients started a JAKi treatment. The cross-sectional analysis of all patients showed a positive correlation between tmTNF crosslinking-induced IL-10 and parameters of disease activity (CRP [r = 0.4091, p = 0.0009], DAS28 [r = 0.3303, p = 0.0082]) at baseline. In the TNFi treatment study, IL-10 was found to be significantly higher in EULAR responders than in non-responders (p = 0.0033). After initiation of JAKi treatment, in contrast, IL-10 induction was not linked to response. Longitudinal analysis of the TNFi-treated patients revealed IL-10 to decrease in responders (p = 0.04), but not in non-responders after 8 weeks of therapy. Of importance, the IL-10 production at baseline correlated inversely with TNFi response determined by ΔDAS28 in patients with TNFi treatment (r = −0.5299, p = 0.0422) while no such link was observed under JAKi therapy (p = 0.22). Receiver operation characteristics (ROC) analysis demonstrated a high performance of tmTNF/crosslinking-induced IL-10 in predicting a TNFi therapy response according to the EULAR criteria (AUC = 0.9286, 95% Confidence interval 0.7825–1.000, p = 0.0055). (4) Conclusions: In this pilot investigation, we demonstrated the feasibility of a whole-blood assay measuring tmTNF-induced IL-10 to predict clinical response to TNF inhibitor treatment. This approach might support rheumatologists in their decision for an individually tailored RA therapy.

Efficacy of Abatacept Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Anti-citrullinated Protein Antibody-Positive Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from a Korean Nationwide Biologics Registry.

Introduction To compare the efficacy of abatacept and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and identify those who benefit most from abatacept over TNFi.MethodsThis observational study identified RA patients who were ACPA-positive and initiated abatacept or TNFi from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics and Targeted therapy registry. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to balance baseline confounding in abatacept- or TNFi-treated patients. The major endpoints were changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and achievement of CDAI remission/low disease activity after 1 year of treatment. Subgroup analysis was mainly performed stratified by prior biologics use.ResultsA total of 291 PS-matched, ACPA-positive RA patients who initiated abatacept (n = 97) and TNFi (n = 194) were included. From baseline CDAI scores of 26.52 in the abatacept group and 26.38 in the TNFi group, the mean changes after 1 year were − 16.78 and − 13.61, respectively (difference − 3.17, p = 0.020). The proportion of patients achieving CDAI remission/low disease activity was 68.0% with abatacept and 52.6% with TNFi (p = 0.013). In the subgroup analysis, patients that were biologics-naïve had better improvement in CDAI after treatment with abatacept than TNFi (difference − 3.35, p = 0.021).ConclusionsThis real-world study suggests that abatacept may have better clinical response compared to TNFi in patients with established ACPA-positive RA, especially in those that were biologics-naïve.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00467-4.

Persistence, effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab compared to TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis within the Italian PsABio cohort.

To compare real-world persistence, effectiveness and tolerability of ustekinumab versus TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). One-year data from Italian subjects enrolled in the PsABio study (PsA patients receiving 1st- to 3rd-line treatment with ustekinumab or TNFi) were evaluated. Treatment persistence was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves; hazard ratios (HR) of stopping treatment, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were computed through Cox regression models. Proportions of patients reaching clinical effectiveness endpoints were analysed using logistic regression, including propensity score (PS) adjustment for imbalanced baseline covariates, and non-response imputation if treatment was stopped/switched. Among 222 participants with follow-up data (effectiveness set), 101 received ustekinumab and 121 TNFi. In the ustekinumab group, 74.3% continued treatment up to 12±3 months compared to 63.6% in the TNFi group. Ustekinumab showed better persistence than TNFi, overall and in specific subgroups (females, monotherapy without methotrexate, BMI <25 or >30 kg/m2, patients receiving ustekinumab as 2nd-line treatment instead of a second TNFi). Overall, the PS-adjusted HR of treatment discontinuation was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.26-0.82) for ustekinumab vs. TNFi. cDAPSA LDA/remission was achieved in 43.5% of ustekinumab and 43.6% of TNFi-treated patients, while MDA was achieved in 24.2% and 28.0% of patients, respectively. After PS adjustment, odds ratios of clinical effectiveness did not differ significantly. Both treatments showed an acceptable safety profile. This prospective, real-life study found a better persistence of ustekinumab than TNFi in PsA patients. At 1 year, both treatments showed similar effectiveness.

TNF inhibitors increase the risk of nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis in a mycobacterium tuberculosis endemic area

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFI) on nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) infection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) endemic area. We selected 1089 TNFI-treated RA patients and 4356 untreated RA patients using propensity-matching analysis according to age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from July 2009 to December 2010. Both groups were followed-up until the end of 2016 to measure the incidence of mycobacterial diseases. The incidence rate of NTM in TNFI-treated RA group was similar to those of MTB (328.1 and 340.9 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of NTM for TNFI-treated RA compared to untreated RA was 1.751(95% CI 1.105–2.774). The risk of TNFI-associated NTM in RA was 2.108-fold higher among women than men. The age-stratified effects of TNFI on NTM development were significantly high in RA patients aged 50–65 years (aHR 2.018). RA patients without comorbidities had a higher incidence of NTM following TNFI treatment (aHR 1.742). This real-world, observational study highlights the need to increase awareness of NTM in TNFI-treated RA patients in an MTB endemic area.

Persistence and effectiveness of the IL-12/23 pathway inhibitor ustekinumab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 1-year results from the real-world PsABio Study

ObjectiveWe evaluated real-world treatment persistence and effectiveness at 1 year following initiation of IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) for psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsPsABio (NCT02627768), a prospective,...

Calprotectin (S100A8/S100A9) detects inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tocilizumab therapy

BackgroundAssessing serological inflammation is difficult in tocilizumab (TCZ)-treated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, as standard inflammation parameters, like erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), are influenced by interleukin-6-receptor inhibition. Calprotectin in the serum, also named S100A8/S100A9, might be a more useful inflammation parameter in TCZ-treated patients.MethodsSixty-nine RA patients taking TCZ were included. Serum-calprotectin levels were assessed, as well as ESR, CRP, need for a change in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs due to RA activity (= active RA), and the RA clinical disease activity score (CDAI). Forty-five RA patients taking tumor-necrosis factor-inhibitors (TNFi) were investigated for the same parameters.ResultsTCZ-treated patients with active RA had higher calprotectin values than not active RA patients (4155.5 [inter quartile range 1865.3–6068.3] vs 1040.0 [676.0–1638.0] ng/ml, P < 0.001). A calprotectin cut-off value of 1916.5 ng/ml resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 80.0 %, respectively, for the detection of RA disease activity. Calprotectin values correlated with CDAI-scores (r = 0.228; P = 0.011). ESR and CRP were less suitable to detect RA activity in TCZ-treated patients. Also TNFi-treated patients with active RA had higher calprotectin values compared to not active RA (5422.0 [3749.0–8150.8] vs 1845.0 [832.0–2569.0] ng/ml, P < 0.001). The calprotectin value with the best sensitivity and specificity for detecting RA activity was 3690.5 ng/ml among TNFi-treated patients.ConclusionCalprotectin in the serum can be a useful inflammation parameter despite TCZ-treatment.

The Comparative Risk of Serious Adverse Events With Tofacitinib and TNF Inhibitors in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: The Korean Experience as Revealed by a National Database.

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor approved in South Korea for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) on May 1, 2019. However, safety data are lacking. We investigated the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with UC using tofacitinib from the National Health Insurance Service database. In all, 1,026 UC patients were enrolled in this study. The overall incidences (100 person-years; 95% confidence interval) of SAEs were 4.06 (1.63–8.36) and 6.30 (4.59–8.43) in the tofacitinib and anti-TNFi groups, respectively. No thromboembolic event occurred and major cardiovascular events occurred in only three patients (two unstable angina and one congestive heart failure) in the tofacitinib group. The incidence of herpes zoster and tuberculosis did not differ between the two groups. There was no difference in the overall incidence of SAEs, including thromboembolic events, between tofacitinib- and TNFi-treated UC patients.

The Annual Diagnostic Prevalence of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Axial Spondyloarthritis in the United States Using Medicare and MarketScan Databases.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in the United States and examine treatment patterns for these diseases.MethodsThis retrospective observational cohort study drew from 2006‐2014 data in the US Medicare Fee‐for‐Service and IBM MarketScan databases. AS and axSpA diagnoses were identified through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD‐9] codes. Diagnostic prevalence (per 10,000 patients) was calculated as patients with AS and axSpA with full insurance coverage in each calendar year divided by the total patients with full insurance coverage in the same year. Two diagnosis definitions were used: definition 1 (D1), one or more relevant ICD‐9 codes from hospital claims or two or more relevant ICD‐9 codes from outpatient claims; definition 2 (D2), one or more codes from hospital/outpatient claims. Primary analyses assessed annual AS and axSpA prevalence (D1); sensitivity analyses assessed annual (D2) and 2‐year prevalence. Patterns in prevalence and treatment use were analyzed descriptively; no statistical tests were performed.ResultsAn increase in AS prevalence (per 10,000 patients) was seen from 2006 to 2014 in primary analyses (Medicare: 2.12‐3.60; MarketScan: 0.85‐1.42) and sensitivity analyses. A similar trend occurred for axSpA (Medicare: 4.39‐6.52; MarketScan: 1.33‐2.21). For Medicare, the proportion of patients with AS (D1) using tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis), conventional synthetic antirheumatic drugs (csARDs), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and glucocorticoids remained relatively stable; for MarketScan, TNFi‐treated patients increased (51.7% to 65.7%) and NSAID‐treated patients decreased (63.5% to 55.7%).ConclusionAS and axSpA prevalence may have increased in the United States between 2006 and 2014. Reasons are unknown, but this may be due to increased disease awareness, among other factors.

Comparative efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and their biosimilars in patients with rheumatoid arthritis having an insufficient response to methotrexate : Anetwork meta-analysis.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFI) biosimilars to TNFI originators in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who responded inadequately to methotrexate (MTX). We conducted ameta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TNFI biosimilars to TNFIs in patients with RA who had not responded adequately to MTX. A total of 18 RCTs (8adalimumab, 7infliximab, and 3etanercept) comprising 4039patients randomized to TNFI biosimilars and 3905 to TNFI treatment were included. The American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response rate was significantly higher for TNFI biosimilar-treated patients than for TNFI-treated patients (odds ratio, OR 1.140, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.031-1.261, P = 0.011); however, subgroup analysis by the TNFI type showed that the ACR20 response rates were not different among the biosimilars of adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept compared with the originators. The ACR50 response rate was significantly higher for TNFI biosimilar-treated patients than for TNFI treated patients (OR 1.096, 95% CI 1.001-1.200, P = 0.047). Subgroup analysis by the TNFI type showed that the ACR50 response rates did not differ among the biosimilars of adalimumab and infliximab compared with the originators; however, the ACR50 response rate was significantly higher in etanercept biosimilar-treated patients than in etanercept-treated patients (OR 1.406, 95% CI 1.111-1.780, P = 0.005). No significant difference was observed between the TNFI biosimilars and TNFIs as per ACR70. There was no significant difference in the number of patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) between TNFI biosimilars and TNFIs (OR 0.961, 95% CI 0.876-1.055, P = 0.402); however, subgroup analysis by the TNFI type showed that the adalimumab biosimilar caused fewer AEs than adalimumab (OR 0.865, 95% CI 0.756-0.989, P = 0.034). Serious AEs and withdrawals due to AEs did not differ between TNFI biosimilars and TNFIs. This meta-analysis showed that TNFI biosimilars had an overall comparable efficacy and safety profile compared with their originators in RA patients.

PSY12 Experience with Apremilast in Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis in US Clinical Practice; Assessments from Trio Health and the American Rheumatology Network (ARN)

As a PDE4 inhibitor, apremilast is a unique agent in the treatment armamentarium for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). It is the one targeted immune modulating (TIM) treatment that may be combined with csDMARDs, biologic therapies, or used as a monotherapy. Here we examined care for PsA in a large network of community rheumatologists focusing on use of apremilast relative to TNF inhibitors. This study analyzed patients diagnosed with PsA receiving apremilast monotherapy or TNF inhibitor monotherapy as initial targeted treatment between Jan 2014 to Nov 2019 with ≥6 months follow-up. Disease Assessment Scores (DAS) were calculated using CDAI or Rapid 3. As a surrogate for clinical effectiveness, we examined time from monotherapy initiation to modification or discontinuation, defined as either drug discontinuation or addition of a csDMARD or TIM, via KM analyses. Of 817 apremilast-treated patients, 378 (46%) had no prior observed PsA treatment, 205 (25%) had previous csDMARDs treatment alone, and 234 (29%) previously received other TIM therapies. 329 apremilast-treated patients and 2438 TNFi-treated patients were identified as receiving monotherapy with no prior TIM therapy. From the TNFi-group, a subset of 658 patients were selected based on propensity score matching. Characteristics for the apremilast monotherapy and TNFi monotherapy groups differed significantly for gender and age group but not for baseline disease severity. Median time from monotherapy initiation to initial modification or discontinuation was significantly different between apremilast (17.0 months) and TNFi (34.4 months, p=0.002). In subset analyses, these differences persisted among females (p = 0.03), males (p <0.001) and patients with severe baseline DAS (p=0.009), but not different among non-severe baseline DAS. Time to apremilast modification or discontinuation was significantly less than the matched TNFi group. However, when stratified by baseline DAS, those with low DAS had no difference in time to modification between apremilast and TNFi.