Tissue Polypeptide Specific Antigen Research Articles

Association between Tissue Polypeptide Specific Antigen and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Colorectal Cancer Patients and their Relation with P53 Expression and Global DNA Methylation

Background: Colorectal cancer is a high risk disease with rapidly progression medical problems and high mortality rate. Tissue polypeptide specific antigen can be classified as biomarker candidates in colorectal cancer and other kinds of cancer. Vascular endothelial-derived growth factor has a curial role in the formation of new blood vessels. DNA methylation may decrease invasiveness of cancer. Objectives: This study was designed to measure the potential role of some serological biomarkers in the progression of colorectal cancer as well as their relations to P53 expression, global 5-methylcytosine. Patients and Methods: This study involved of 60 patients with colorectal cancer who attended Oncology Teaching Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq and compared with 30 apparently healthy volunteers. All participants were checked for serological biomarker levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Also, DNA and RNA extracted and the levels of 5-methylcytosine and P53 expression were evaluated. The SPSS version 24.0 program was used for all statistical analysis done in this study. Results: The analysis of serological biomarker data has shown that the mean of tissue polypeptide specific antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor was significantly higher for patients with colorectal cancer, while it was lower for control subjects (356.4 ± 16.9, 139.75 ± 7.31) and (1127.82±65.41, 388.93±35.86), respectively. Also, a significant positive relation between tissue polypeptide specific antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor in the tumor area was significantly associated with control (P≤ 0.001). However, there was significant correlation in the levels of P53 expression and global DNA methylation between studied groups as well as tissue polypeptide specific antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor (P ≥ 0.05). Conclusion: The serological biomarkers include tissue polypeptide specific antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor and they play a critical role in the development of colorectal cancer. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor is useful in distinguishing colorectal cancer from healthy controls, whereas tissue polypeptide specific antigen is an independent prognostic factor for colorectal cancer proliferation. Received: Mar. 2023 Accepted: Jun 2023 Published: Oct.2023

Prognostic role of serum soluble ST2 of advanced breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

The soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 receptor (sST2) binds to interleukin-33 (IL-33) and blocks IL-33 and ST2 binding, suggesting that sST2 acts as a "decoy" receptor for IL-33 and is involved in the malignant progression of breast cancer. This paper aimed to investigate the differences in sST2 expression in patients with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer and assess its clinical value in the prognostic evaluation of advanced breast cancer. In this paper, we collected sera from 91 patients firstly diagnosed with advanced breast cancer at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from 2008 to 2021 during their first hospitalization. We detected the expression level of sST2 in the serum of patients with different molecular fractions of breast cancer and analyzed the relationship between serum sST2 levels and breast cancer-related bone metastasis, cardiotoxicity, and overall survival. Bone metastases were detected using the Emission Computed Tomography technique, and chemotherapy drug-induced cardiotoxicity was detected by echocardiography. The Overall Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to demonstrate the association between variables and sST2 levels. Serum sST2 levels did not vary among the different pathological types, molecular types, and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and tumor proliferation marker (Ki-67) subgroups, and only differed significantly in the cardiotoxicity group. There were no statistical differences in tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPSA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153), D-dimer, and inflammatory indexes neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) among different molecular subgroups. However, except for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), there was no difference in peripheral blood soluble ST2 concentrations among other molecular subtypes. Meanwhile, the survival of the high sST2 level group among advanced breast cancer patients was significantly lower than that of the normal group, and sST2 expression was closely related to cardiotoxicity and clinical stage. Serum sST2 is not only traditionally applied to the assessment of cardiac injury, but can also be utilized for assessing the prognosis of advanced breast cancer, excluding the influence of clinical stage and cardiotoxicity.

Implications of Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Markers in the Attenuation of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping.

To date, no model has jointly encompassed clinical, inflammatory, and redox markers with the risk of a non-dipper blood pressure (BP) profile. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between these features and the main twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24-h ABPM) indices, as well as to establish a multivariate model including inflammatory, redox, and clinical markers for the prediction of a non-dipper BP profile. This was an observational study that included hypertensive patients older than 18 years. We enrolled 247 hypertensive patients (56% women) with a median age of 56 years. The results showed that higher levels of fibrinogen, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen, beta-2-microglobulin, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, and copper/zinc ratio were associated with a higher risk of a non-dipper BP profile. Nocturnal systolic BP dipping showed a negative correlation with beta-globulin, beta-2-microglobulin, and gamma-globulin levels, whereas nocturnal diastolic BP dipping was positively correlated with alpha-2-globulin levels, and negatively correlated with gamma-globulin and copper levels. We found a correlation between nocturnal pulse pressure and beta-2-microglobulin and vitamin E levels, whereas the day-to-night pulse pressure gradient was correlated with zinc levels. Twenty-four-hour ABPM indices could exhibit singular inflammatory and redox patterns with implications that are still poorly understood. Some inflammatory and redox markers could be associated with the risk of a non-dipper BP profile.

Circulating Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen in Pre-Diagnostic Pancreatic Cancer Samples.

Simple SummaryDetecting cancer early significantly increases the chances of successful (surgical) treatment. Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancer forms, since it is usually discovered at a late and already spread stage. Finding biomarkers showing pancreatic cancer at an early stage is a possible approach to early detection and improved treatment. The aim of our study was to assess the potential of tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) as a biomarker for early pancreatic cancer detection. We studied TPS levels in blood plasma samples from a population-based biobank in Västerbotten, Sweden that were collected before individuals were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Although TPS levels are raised at diagnosis, this occurs late, and thus TPS does not seem to hold promise as an early detection marker for pancreatic cancer.Early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is challenging, and late diagnosis partly explains the low 5-year survival. Novel and sensitive biomarkers are needed to enable early PDAC detection and improve patient outcomes. Tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) has been studied as a biomarker in PDAC diagnostics, and it has previously been shown to reflect clinical status better than the ‘golden standard’ biomarker carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) that is most widely used in the clinical setting. In this cross-sectional case-control study using pre-diagnostic plasma samples, we aim to evaluate the potential of TPS as a biomarker for early PDAC detection. Furthermore, in a subset of individuals with multiple samples available at different time points before diagnosis, a longitudinal analysis was used. We assessed plasma TPS levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 267 pre-diagnostic PDAC plasma samples taken up to 18.8 years before clinical PDAC diagnosis and in 320 matched healthy controls. TPS levels were also assessed in 25 samples at PDAC diagnosis. Circulating TPS levels were low both in pre-diagnostic samples of future PDAC patients and in healthy controls, whereas TPS levels at PDAC diagnosis were significantly increased (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.05) in a logistic regression model adjusted for age. In conclusion, TPS levels increase late in PDAC progression and hold no potential as a biomarker for early detection.

The Role of Serum Tumor Markers in Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Malignant Lung Tumors.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of selected tumor markers for the detection of lung cancer recurrence during follow-up. The study group consisted of 109 patients and 109 healthy controls. The following biomarkers were selected: Carcinoembryonic antigen; cytokeratin fragment 19; neuron-specific enolase; tissue polypeptide-specific antigen; cytokeratin fragments 8, 18 and 19; insulin-like growth factor 1; pro-gastrin-releasing peptide; and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The biomarkers were assessed individually or using a multivariate analysis. Carcinoembryonic antigen [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC)=0.6857, p<0.0001] and cytokeratin fragment 19 (AUC=0.6882, p<0.0001) proved best in detecting relapse. The multivariate model indicated insulin-like growth factor 1 (p=0.0006, AUC=0.6225) as the third most useful biomarker. The multivariate model using these three markers achieved the best AUC value of 0.7730 (p=0.0050). We demonstrated that carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin fragment 19 play a key role in the detection of lung cancer recurrence. A multivariate approach can increase the effectiveness of detection.

Evaluation of biomarkers, genetic mutations, and epigenetic modifications in early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUNDPancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest malignancies with an alarming mortality rate. Despite significant advancement in diagnostics and therapeutics, early diagnosis remains elusive causing poor prognosis, marred by mutations and epigenetic modifications in key genes which contribute to disease progression. AIMTo evaluate the various biological tumor markers collectively for early diagnosis which could act as prognostic biomarkers and helps in future therapeutics of PC in Kashmir valley. METHODSA total of 50 confirmed PC cases were included in the study to evaluate the levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Mutational analysis was performed to evaluate the mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS), Breast cancer type 2 (BRCA-2), and deleted in pancreatic cancer-4 (DPC-4) genes. However, epigenetic modifications (methylation of CpG islands) were performed in the promoter regions of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16; CDKN2A), MutL homolog 1 (hMLH1), and Ras association domain-containing protein 1(RASSF1A) genes.RESULTSWe found significantly elevated levels of biological markers CA 19-9 (P ≤ 0.05), TPS (P ≤ 0.05), CEA (P ≤ 0.001), and VEGF (P ≤ 0.001). Molecular genetic analysis revealed that KRAS gene mutation is predominant in codon 12 (16 subjects, P ≤ 0.05), and 13 (12 subjects, P ≤ 0.05). However, we did not find a mutation in DPC-4 (1203G > T) and BRCA-2 (617delT) genes. Furthermore, epigenetic modification revealed that CpG methylation in 21 (P ≤ 0.05) and 4 subjects in the promoter regions of the p16 and hMLH1 gene, respectively.CONCLUSIONIn conclusion, CA 19-9, TPS, CEA, and VEGF levels were significantly elevated and collectively have potential as diagnostic and prognostic markers in PC. Global data of mutation in the KRAS gene commonly in codon 12 and rare in codon 13 could augment the predisposition towards PC. Additionally, methylation of the p16 gene could also modulate transcription of genes thereby increasing the predisposition and susceptibility towards PC.

The role of TPS, CA125, CA15-3 and CEA in prediction of distant metastasis of breast cancer

ObjectiveTo explore the application value of breast cancer tumor markers tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) detection alone or in combination for the monitoring of distant metastasis of breast cancer. MethodThe clinical data of 389 female breast cancer patients admitted to Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2016 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Serum levels of TPS, CA125, CA15-3, and CEA were compared to analyze their significance in prediction distant metastasis of breast cancer. The patients were divided into the distant metastatic group and the non-metastatic group according to whether the patients had distant metastasis. The non-metastatic group was divided into the control group and the occult metastasis group according to whether distant metastases occurred in 3 years after treatment. ResultThe receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that all four markers had the diagnostic value in distant metastasis of breast cancer (AUCTPS = 0.754, AUC15-3 = 0.821, AUCCEA = 0.755, AUCCA125 = 0.651) and in occult metastasis in 3 years after treatment (AUCTPS = 0.751, AUC15-3 = 0.744, AUCCEA = 0.725, AUCCA125 = 0.661). To estimate whether the discrimination ability could be improved by marker panels, we established marker panels composed of TPS, CA125, CA15-3, and CEA. To discriminate distant metastasis from non-distant metastasis, the diagnostic ability of different panels composed of TPS, CA125, CA15-3 and CEA did not show significant difference compared with single CA15-3 (P > 0.05). To discriminate occult metastasis from the control group, no significant difference was shown in AUC between marker panels and single marker (P > 0.05). However, the sensitivity was improved when the marker-panels were used overall. ConclusionAll tumor markers have abilities in prediction of distant metastasis of breast cancer. The combined detection of the markers is more valuable than using single tumor marker in improving sensitivity. Two markers' panels are more suitable for the prediction of distant metastasis of breast cancer than three or four makers' panels with the similar sensitivity and AUC.

Current Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer has become the prototypical solid tumor where targets have been identified within the tumor allowing for personalized approach for systemic therapy. Biomarkers are beginning to play an important role in preparing the way for precision treatment. Mandatory biomarkers for every newly diagnosed case of breast cancer are estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in selecting patients for endocrine treatment and HER2 for identifying patients likely to benefit from antiHER2 therapy. Although methodological problems exist in the determination of Ki67, because of its clearly established clinical value, wide availability, and low costs relative to the available multianalyte signatures, Ki67 may be used for determining prognosis, especially if values are low or high. Also, the androgen receptor (AR) pathway is emerging as a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer. AR-targeted treatments for breast cancer are in development and have shown promising preliminary results. While, most established biomarkers in breast cancer require tissue samples, serum tumor markers are easily accessible and require a less invasive procedure. Among them, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), a specific epitope structure of a peptide in serum associated with human cytokeratin 18, is linked to the proliferative activity of tumors. TPS may be a valuable and independent prognostic biomarker for breast cancer.In order to accelerate progress towards precision treatment for women with breast cancer, we need additional predictive biomarker, especially for enhancing the positive predictive value for endocrine and antiHER2 therapies, as well as biomarkers for predicting response to specific forms of chemotherapy.

Biochemical Markers of Colorectal Cancer - Present and Future.

According to a report by the National Cancer Institute, colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. CRC is often recognized too late for successful therapy. Tumor markers have been sought for a number of years to detect the transformation of malignant cells at the earliest possible stage. They are usually proteins associated with a malignancy and might be clinically useful in patients with cancer. Several classical markers have been used to recognize colorectal cancer, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA 19.9), tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) and tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72). None of these tests, however, have excellent diagnostic accuracy. Recent studies have been conducted on the use of hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) and various enzymes in the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer. These include macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-3, interleukin-6 and enzymes (alcohol dehydrogenase and lysosomal exoglycosidases). Significantly, most cancer deaths are not caused by the primary tumor itself but by its spread. Analysis of circulating cancer cells (CTCs), ie, factors responsible for metastasis, may be a source of information useful in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Currently available markers have significant limitations.

Comparative Evaluation of the Bladder Tumor-Associated Antigen, Urinary Bladder Cancer Antigen, Tissue Polypeptide Specific Antigen and Voided Urine Cytology in Early Detection of Primary Bladder Tumors

Although a large number of biomarkers for primary assessment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) have been explored, their real diagnostic performance is not well known. This study aimed to conduct a direct comparison of three biomarkers with some unique characteristics for detection of NMIBC and to compare their diagnostic accuracy to that of routine urine cytology. Our results indicated that the overall clinical sensitivity of BTA was the highest of all assays (76.92%), whereas that of cytology was the smallest one (12.50%). On the other hand, BTA and cytology had the highest specificities (89.79% vs. 96.87%) with no significant differences between them. A multi-biomarker panel including BTA, UBC, and TPS with an overall clinical specificity of 100% better assess the primary NMIBC as compared to approaches entailing just one or two of these biomarkers or routine urine cytology. Keywords: BTA, UBC, TPS, urinary cytology, bladder cancer

Lactate dehydrogenase and serum tumor markers for predicting metastatic status in geriatric patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

No tumor biomarker (TM) is available for de novo metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. To examine the serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CA125, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to predict de novo metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. This was a retrospective study of geriatric (⩾ 60 years of age) patients with lung cancer diagnosed at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from 02/2012 to 12/2017. CEA, CYFRA21-1, CA199, NSE, CA125, TPA, and TPS were detected by ELISA and LDH was detected by LDH kit. Their predictive value was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and multivariable logistic regression. The positive rates of LDH and TMs were higher in the metastatic group (all P< 0.05). The best single TMs were CYFRA21-1 (70.5% sensitivity) and CA199 (92.0% specificity). When using any two, the best were CYFRA21-1+TPA (77.1% sensitivity) and CA199+TPA or NSE (both 84.1% specificity). High LDH and CA125 statuses were each independently associated with brain, bone, liver, and lung metastases (all P< 0.05). Abnormal level of LDH and TMs, alone or in combination, had predictive value for metastasis in geriatric patients with lung adenocarcinoma; these indicators were also associated with the metastatic site.

Canine perineal tumours and selected tumour markers

The most frequent canine perineal tumour is the perianal (gland) adenoma (also known as the circumanal adenoma or the hepatoid adenoma). Tumour markers are substances that are produced by the body in response to cancer, or may be produced by cancer itself. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPSA) are tumour antigens that are markers of carcinogenesis, with significantly elevated serum concentrations in the case of some types of tumours. In our study it has been proven that dogs with a perineal tumour (n = 35) had a mean value of CEA 0.69 ng·ml-1 compared to control dogs (n = 150) with 0.67 ng·ml-1 (P &gt; 0.05). In TPSA dogs with perineal tumour, the mean value of TPSA was 15.86 IU·l-1 vs 13.92 IU·l-1 in the control dogs (P &lt; 0.05). The results of the present study show that there is significant differences in TPSA between control dogs and group of dogs with a perineal tumour. Analysis of oncomarkers is a valuable tool for practitioners within small animal oncology, having an advantage over tissue biomarkers as the measurement procedure is non-invasive and shows dynamic changes of physiological and pathological states before clinical signs appear. Therefore, it may be used for an early detection of cancer.

Clinical Value of Combined Determination of Serum B7-H4 with Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Osteopontin, or Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.

Aim B7-H4 is member of the B7 family that negatively regulates the immune response, which are associated with tumor development and prognosis. The present study is aimed at examining serum B7-H4 expression and exploring its contribution to diagnosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods We determined serum expressions of B7-H4, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), osteopontin (OPN), and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in 59 patients with colorectal cancer and 29 healthy volunteers and analyzed the diagnostic value of B7-H4 combined with CEA, OPN, or TPS detection for colorectal cancer. B7-H4, OPN, and TPS serum expressions were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and CEA was measured by electrochemical luminescence detection. Results Serum B7-H4 levels were significantly higher in colorectal cancer patients compared with paired normal controls (P = 0.001). B7-H4 serum level was positively correlated with infiltration depth, tumor masses, and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004, P = 0.016, and P = 0.0052, respectively). We also detected serum expression of B7-H4 before and after radical resection and showed that B7-H4 levels decreased significantly during the first week postoperation (P = 0.0064). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to indicate the potential diagnostic values of these markers. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) for B7-H4, OPN, TPS, and CEA were 0.867, 0.805, 0.812, and 0.833, respectively. The optimal sensitivity and specificity of B7-H4 for discriminating between colon cancer patients and healthy controls were 88.2% and 86.7%, respectively, using a cut-off of value of 78.89 ng/mL. However, combined ROC analysis using B7-H4 and CEA revealed an AUC of 0.929, with a sensitivity of 98.9% and a specificity of 80.4% for discriminating colon cancer patients from healthy controls. Conclusions B7-H4 was highly expressed in the serum in colorectal cancer patients. Detection of B7-H4 plus CEA showed significantly increased sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls compared to individual detection of these markers. Combined detection of serum B7-H4 and CEA may thus have the potential to become a new laboratory method for the early clinical diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of colorectal cancer.

CEA, CA 15-3, and TPS as Prognostic Factors in the Follow-up Monitoring of Patients After Radical Surgery for Breast Cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) to predict relapse in breast cancer patients, when the measurement of biomarkers is performed within 6 months after surgery. Four hundred and seventy-two patients with breast cancer were evaluated. TPS, CEA, and CA 15-3 were measured in months 1, 3, and 6, after surgery. Disease recurrence was recorded between 7-12 months after surgery. Disease recurrence occurred in 60 patients, while 412 patients remained in recurrence-free status. TPS levels of the recurrence group differed statistically significantly in the first and sixth month after surgery compared to recurrence-free group (p=0.0339, AUC=0.6056; p<0.0001, AUC=0.7196). CEA and CA 15-3 measurements did not achieve a statistically significant difference for any month examined. TPS level in the sixth month after surgery is the best candidate biomarker to predict disease recurrence.

The Association of Baseline Serum Tumour Markers with Outcome of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies in the First Line.

The measurement of serum tumour markers is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing the response to systemic therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and estimation of prognosis. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the association of baseline serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), thymidine kinase (TK) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) with outcome of patients with mCRC treated with combination of chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR mAbs) in the first line. In our study, the cohort included 102 patients treated with therapy based on anti-EGFR mAbs between years 2011 and 2017 at Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical School and University Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic. Serum samples were collected within one month before the initiation of treatment. In multivariate Cox analysis that included serum tumour markers and clinical baseline parameters show that high baseline serum CA 19-9 was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival (HR=1.871, p=0.0330) and also overall survival (HR=3.903, p=0.0006). We have not demonstrated association of baseline levels of CEA, TK and TPS with patients' outcome. CA 19-9 is commonly used serum tumour marker which is simple and readily available and its candidate prognostic importance in the setting of anti-EGFR therapy deserves to be studied in prospective trials.

Role of Salivary Biomarkers in Oral Cancer Detection.

Oral cancers are the sixth most frequent cancer with a high mortality rate. Oral squamous cell carcinomaaccounts for more than 90% of all oral cancers. Standard methods used to detect oral cancers remain comprehensive clinical examination, expensive biochemical investigations, and invasive biopsy. The identification of biomarkers from biological fluids (blood, urine, saliva) has the potential of early diagnosis. The use of saliva for early cancer detection in the search for new clinical markers is a promising approach because of its noninvasive sampling and easy collection methods. Human whole-mouth saliva contains proteins, peptides, electrolytes, organic, and inorganic salts secreted by salivary glands and complimentary contributions from gingival crevicular fluids and mucosal transudates. This diagnostic modality in the field of molecular biology has led to the discovery and potential of salivary biomarkers for the detection of oral cancers. Biomarkers are the molecular signatures and indicators of normal biological, pathological process, and pharmacological response to treatment hence may provide useful information for detection, diagnosis, and prognosis of the disease. Saliva's direct contact with oral cancer lesions makes it more specific and potentially sensitive screening tool, whereas more than 100 salivary biomarkers (DNA, RNA, mRNA, protein markers) have already been identified, including cytokines (IL-8, IL-1b, TNF-α), defensin-1, P53, Cyfra 21-1, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen, dual specificity phosphatase, spermidine/spermineN1-acetyltransferase , profilin, cofilin-1, transferrin, and many more. However, further research is still required for the reliability and validation of salivary biomarkers for clinical applications. This chapter provides the latest up-to-date list of known and emerging potential salivary biomarkers for early diagnosis of oral premalignant and cancerous lesions and monitoring of disease activity.

Gene TNF Polymorphism -308G>A (rs1800629) and Its Relationship with the Efficiency of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapy in Patients with Nonalcoholic Stetohepatitis.

Association of TNF gene polymorphism -308G>A with the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the Russian population was revealed. Carriers of allele A of the TNF gene marker -308G>A have significantly higher risk of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis development: OR=1.69 (1.05; 2.71). Allele A carriage by this marker predicts an increase in the basal HDL level and a decrease in LDL and IL-10 levels in the blood of healthy subjects. Patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, differing by the TNF gene -308G>A marker genotype, differ by the time course of the markers of hepatocellular damage (ALT, AST), activity of hepatocyte apoptosis (tissue polypeptide-specific antigen), and activation of specific humoral immunity (γ-globulin) in response to therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid in a dose of 10-15 mg/kg over 4-6 weeks. Carriers of allele A of the TNF gene polymorphic marker -308G>A are more sensitive to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy than carriers of GG genotype.

The diagnostic value of serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA15-3, and TPS in metastatic breast cancer

This study aims to understand the diagnostic value of serum tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A total of 164 metastatic breast cancer patients in Shanxi Cancer Hospital were recruited between February 2016 and July 2016. 200 breast cancer patients without metastasis in the same period were randomly selected as the control group. The general characteristics, immunohistochemical, and pathological results were investigated between the two groups, and tumor markers were determined. There were statistical differences in the concentration and the positive rates of CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA15-3, and TPS between the MBC and control group (P<0.05). The highest sensitivity was in CEA and the highest specificity was in CA125 for the diagnosis of MBC when using a single tumor marker at 56.7% and 97.0%, respectively. In addition, two tumor markers were used for the diagnosis of MBC and the CEA and TPS combination had the highest diagnostic sensitivity with 78.7%, while the CA15-3 and CA125 combination had the highest specificity of 91.5%. Analysis of tumor markers of 164 MBC found that there were statistical differences in the positive rates of CEA and CA15-3 between bone metastases and other metastases (χ2=6.00, P=0.014; χ2=7.32, P=0.007, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity values of the CEA and CA15-3 combination in the diagnosis of bone metastases were 77.1% and 45.8%, respectively. The positive rate of TPS in the lung metastases group was lower than in other metastases (χ2=8.06, P=0.005).There were significant differences in the positive rates of CA15-3 and TPS between liver metastases and other metastases (χ2=15.42, P<0.001; χ2=9.72, P=0.002, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the CA15-3 and TPS combination in the diagnosis of liver metastases were 92.3% and 45.6%, respectively, and the positive rate of CEA in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer is lower than in other subtypes (χ2=4.80, P=0.028). Therefore, serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA15-3, and TPS can be used in the diagnosis of MBC, and different combinations of tumor markers have varying diagnostic value.

Tumor markers of breast cancer: New prospectives

Abstract Tumor markers are substances produced by the tumors or by other cells of the body in response to cancer or certain benign conditions. Although most of these markers are made by the normal cells as well as by cancer cells, they are produced at much higher levels in cancerous conditions. These markers are used to evaluate the patient's response to treatment and to detect the presence of metastasis or recurrence. Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in females worldwide. The CA 27-29, CA 15-3, CA27.29, carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide specific antigen, p53, cathepsin D, cyclin E, nestin and HER-2 are tumor markers that are often expressed in people with breast cancer. They play a crucial role in diagnosis, monitoring response to therapy, early detection of metastasis and determination of recurrence in patients with breast cancer.

Tumor Markers of Breast Cancer: Role in Early Diagnosis, Monitoring Response to Therapy and Determination of Prognosis

A tumor marker is a substance that is produced by the body in response to malignant tumors, or produced by the cancer itself. Some of these markers are specific to one cancer, while others are seen in several types of cancer. These markers are generally used to evaluate the patient's response to treatment or to monitor the presence of metastasis or recurrence. Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in females worldwide. Tumor markers may play a role in early detection, and hence favourable prognosis of breast cancer. The CA 27-29 is a tumor marker that is most often used in people with breast cancer. Also, CA 15-3, BR 27.29 (CA27.29), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide specific antigen, p53, cathepsin D, cyclin E, nestin and HER-2 are widely used for diagnosis, monitoring response to therapy, early detection of metastasis and determination of recurrence of breast cancer.