Photosensitizer Concentration In Tissue Research Articles

Fluorescent standards for photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy is an evolving technique for treatment of various oncological diseases. This method employs photosensitizers - species that lead to death of tumor cells after the photoactivation. For further development and novel applications of photodynamic therapy new photosensitizers are required. After synthesis of a new photosensitizer it is important to know its concentration in different biological tissues after its administration and distribution. The concentration is frequently measured by the extraction method, which has some disadvantages, e.g. it requires many biological test subjects that are euthanized during the measurement. We propose to measure the photosensitizer concentration in tissue by its fluorescence. For this purpose fluorescent standards were developed. The standards are robust and simple to produce; their fluorescence signal does not change with time. The fluorescence intensity of fluorescent standards seems to depend linearly on the dye concentration. A set of standards thus allow the calibration of a spectrometer. Finally, the photosensitizer concentration can be determined by the fluorescence intensity after comparing the corresponding spectrum with spectra of the set of fluorescent standards. A biological test subject is not euthanized during this kind of experiment. We hope this more humane technique can be used in future instead of the extraction method.

Assessment of Photosensitizer Dosimetry and Tissue Damage Assay for Photodynamic Therapy in Advanced‐stage Tumors¶

ABSTRACTPhotodynamic therapy (PDT) efficacy is a complex function of tissue sensitivity, photosensitizer (PS) uptake, tissue oxygen concentration, delivered light dose and some other parameters. To better understand the mechanisms and optimization of PDT treatment, we assessed two techniques for quantifying tissue PS concentration and two methods for quantifying pathological tumor damage. The two methods used to determine tissue PS concentration kinetic were in vivo fluorescence probe and ex vivo chemical extraction. Both methods show that the highest tumor to normal tissue PS uptake ratio appears 4 h after PS administration. Two different histopathologic techniques were used to quantify tumor and normal tissue damage. A planimetry assessment of regional tumor necrosis demonstrated a linear relationship with increasing light dose. However, in large murine tumors this finding was complicated by the presence of significant spontaneous necrosis. A second method (densitometry) assessed cell death by nuclear size and density. With some exceptions the densitometry method generally supported the planimetry results. Although the densitometry method is potentially more accurate, it has greater potential subjectivity. Finally, our research suggests that the tools or methods we are studying for quantifying PS levels and tissue damage are necessary for the understanding of PDT effect and therapeutic ratio in experimental in vivo tumor research.

Assessment of photosensitizer dosimetry and tissue damage assay for photodynamic therapy in advanced-stage tumors.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) efficacy is a complex function of tissue sensitivity, photosensitizer (PS) uptake, tissue oxygen concentration, delivered light dose and some other parameters. To better understand the mechanisms and optimization of PDT treatment, we assessed two techniques for quantifying tissue PS concentration and two methods for quantifying pathological tumor damage. The two methods used to determine tissue PS concentration kinetic were in vivo fluorescence probe and ex vivo chemical extraction. Both methods show that the highest tumor to normal tissue PS uptake ratio appears 4 h after PS administration. Two different histopathologic techniques were used to quantify tumor and normal tissue damage. A planimetry assessment of regional tumor necrosis demonstrated a linear relationship with increasing light dose. However, in large murine tumors this finding was complicated by the presence of significant spontaneous necrosis. A second method (densitometry) assessed cell death by nuclear size and density. With some exceptions the densitometry method generally supported the planimetry results. Although the densitometry method is potentially more accurate, it has greater potential subjectivity. Finally, our research suggests that the tools or methods we are studying for quantifying PS levels and tissue damage are necessary for the understanding of PDT effect and therapeutic ratio in experimental in vivo tumor research.

Quantification of phthalocyanine concentration in rat tissue using laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy.

Quantification of photosensitizer concentration in tissue should improve planning and outcome of photodynamic therapy. Laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) can be used to measure in vivo fluorescence of photosensitizers in tissue. This study was designed to determine if in vivo fluorescence intensity of chloroaluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate correlates with its concentration in different rat tissues. Following LIF measurements, the animals were humanely euthanized and the concentration of phthalocyanine in different tissues was determined using chemical extraction technique. The correlation of phthalocyanine fluorescence intensity and its concentration was determined for each tissue using Pearson product-moment correlation analysis. A strong correlation between in vivo phthalocyanine fluorescence intensity and its concentration was found for spleen, kidney, liver, and chemically induced mammary adenocarcinoma. Low correlation was found for thigh skin and planum of nose. No correlation was found for thigh muscle and tongue.

Effect of photosensitizer concentration in tissue on the penetration depth of photoactivating light

The additional optical absorption in tissue resulting from the uptake of exogenous photosensitizers increases the effective attenuation of photoactivating light. This may be significant for the irradiation of solid tumours in photodynamic therapy, since it reduces the depth or volume of tissue treated. The effect has been studied in vitro by using dihaematoporphyrin ether (DHE) and 630 nm light in tissues representing a wide range of absorption and scattering conditions. While the attenuation may be markedly changed by small concentrations of DHE in pure scattering media, tissues with significant inherent light absorption are little affected by the additional absorption of DHE at concentrations relevant to clinical photodynamic therapy. However, it is shown that for other potential photosensitizers such as the phthalocyanines, which have substantially greater absorption at the treatment wavelength than DHE, the penetration of light in tissues may be significantly reduced.