Tissue Expander Group Research Articles

Patient and procedure characteristics associated with postoperative pain after prophylactic versus therapeutic ambulatory bilateral breast surgery.

We investigated whether age, body mass index (BMI), and tissue expander placement were related to postoperative opioid requirement for patients undergoing therapeutic versus prophylactic breast surgery. Postoperative opioid consumption was evaluated for patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction at a freestanding ambulatory cancer surgery center between 2016 and 2021. Ordinal regression tested whether surgical indication was associated with increased postoperative opioid requirements after adjusting for age, BMI, and tissue expander placement. Of 2447 patients, 6% underwent prophylactic surgeries. Therapeutic mastectomy patients had lower postoperative opioid requirement (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91; p = 0.030), but this was not significant after adjusting for covariates (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.53-1.07; p = 0.2). Opioid use increased with higher BMI (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.05-1.08;p < 0.001) and decreased with age (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98; p < 0.001) with therapeutic mastectomy patients being older (median 46 vs. 39). The subpectoral tissue expander group had nearly double the postoperative opioid requirement compared to prepectoral placement (OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.55-2.23; p < 0.001). Increased postoperative opioid requirement in women undergoing prophylactic procedures is best explained by age. Mastectomy patients should be counseled similarly about postoperative pain irrespective of indication. A larger prophylactic mastectomy sample is required to provide more precise estimates.

Immediate Single Stage Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with or Without TIGR Mesh in Iranian Patients Undergoing Mastectomy: A Quasi-experimental Study

Background: Breast cancer is still a major contributing factor to the burden of the disease worldwide. A single-stage implant-based reconstruction (IBR) lowers tissue morbidity, thus increasing overall aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Objectives: Because of the high price of ADM and the lack of insurance coverage in Iran, we aimed at examining the results of using TIGR® mesh in patients with breast cancer. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in Iran (Tehran) from 2016 to 2018. About 140 eligible patients with breast cancer were included and their information was collected and analyzed prospectively during the 3 years that they were referred to the surgery center in Tehran. The reconstruction was performed, as either direct-single staged, implant + TIGR MESH, or delayed-multistage. Patient satisfaction was calculated after 1 year of follow-up, using Body Checking Questionnaire (BCQ) by applying the VAS scale. All statistical analyses were performed at a 95% significance level, using SPSS statistical software version. (Evidence-based medicine level: Level III, a prospective cohort). Results: The results of our study showed slightly more short-term complications than other studies due to the surgical team’s first experience in the surgery. Complications were infection (7.1%), epidermal necrosis (15.9%), and severe capsular contracture (14.2%). Seven patients (6.2%) had full-thickness skin necrosis, and the prosthesis was finally removed. The use of the TIGR Mesh did not increase the rate of complications, and only 5 implant losses in this group and 2 in the tissue expander group were reported. The levels of patients’ satisfaction in IBR and delayed-multistage groups were 44.4% and 12.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Our results showed that placement of TIGR MESH for lower pole support during IBR does not increase the complication rate. Additionally, patients’ satisfaction levels increased compared to traditional methods of reconstruction.

Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Identifying Risk Factors and Outcomes.

Intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) has been described as a useful adjunct to physical examination in predicting mastectomy skin flap viability for immediate breast reconstruction. Its use has been described as a screening tool for mastectomy skin flap viability as well as a test used only for patients at high risk for mastectomy skin flap loss. We performed a national database review of implant-based breast reconstruction surgeries to determine the practice patterns of FA in this patient cohort and to determine if this technology impacted clinical outcomes. A national insurance claims database was reviewed to select patients having undergone direct-to-implant (DTI) and immediate tissue expander (TE) placement with and without intraoperative FA as well as patients who had FA at the time of mastectomy without reconstruction. Patient characteristics that prompted FA and postoperative outcomes with and without FA were evaluated to determine its clinical impact in the observed practice pattern. Of the 48,464 patients identified, 836 had FA. More than twice as many patients undergoing DTI had FA than patients undergoing immediate TE placement (10.4% vs 5%, P < 0.0001). Twelve percent of patients receiving FA at the time of mastectomy had reconstruction delayed. Fluorescence angiography was associated with a trend toward lower overall complication rates in DTI patients (8.0% vs 11.9% without FA) but a significantly higher overall complication rate with immediate TE placement (13.8% vs 10.5% without FA, P = 0.018) and was associated with higher reoperation (12.0% vs 8.3% without FA, P = 0.037) in the TE group. There was no difference in other individual complications, readmission, or explantation for either clinical group with and without FA. Regression analysis identified obesity (odds ratio, 1.32; P < 0.001) and younger age (odds ratio, 1.74; P < 0.001) to be associated with performing FA, whereas obesity, diabetes, and tobacco use were associated with higher complication rates. Younger and otherwise healthier obese patients were more likely to have FA. A greater proportion of DTI patients had FA than TE patients with improved outcomes in the former group and worse outcomes in the latter group. Obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes were associated with worse outcomes, whereas only obesity was associated with FA use.

Symmetry of Nipple Position After Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction: The Impact of Reconstructive Method.

Asymmetry of nipple position is common in the female population. There are scant data on the impact of bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate implant-based reconstruction on nipple asymmetry. A retrospective review was performed of an institutional review board approved prospective database of NSM and immediate implant-based reconstruction was performed. BCCT.core software was used to examine preoperative and postoperative nipple asymmetry. It directly calculates the quantitative differences in nipple position between the breasts expressed as breast retraction assessment (BRA). Nipple to sternal notch (N-SN) asymmetry was calculated from the collected data. Sixty-eight patients undergoing bilateral NSM and implant reconstruction were reviewed. Reconstructive methods were tissue expander (TE) 39 (57.4%) and direct to implant (DTI) (prepectoral 13, submuscular 16) 29 (42.6%). The TE group had greater body mass index (BMI) (23.5 vs 22.1, P = 0.02), mastectomy weight (390.7 vs 243.8, P = 0.001) and higher preoperative N-SN asymmetry (TE 0.89 vs DTI 0.59, P = 0.02). Ten patients received radiation (TE group 4, DTI group 6). The TE group had larger implant size (479.1 vs 375.0, P = 0.0001). Overall, TE reconstruction resulted in an increase in nipple asymmetry (mean BRA: preoperative, 1.50 vs postoperative, 1.65), which was not significant. Direct to implant reconstruction increased nipple asymmetry: mean N-SN asymmetry preoperative 0.59 versus postoperative 0.97 (P = 0.04) and mean BRA scores 1.40 and 1.82 (P = 0.06). Both implant locations in the DTI group resulted in an increase in postoperative asymmetry but was significant for the prepectoral group: mean BRA preoperative 1.19 versus postoperative 1.85, P = 0.02 and mean N-SN asymmetry preoperative 0.48 vs postoperative 0.94, P = 0.04. Radiation impacted the final mean BRA score: radiation 2.24 versus no radiation 1.63 (P = 0.05). Patients who underwent TE reconstruction had significantly larger breasts and greater preoperative N-SN asymmetry than the DTI group. Despite this, the TE group resulted in mild increase in nipple asymmetry. Both implant locations in DTI reconstruction resulted in increased postoperative asymmetry but was significant for the prepectoral group. Radiation therapy has a significant impact of nipple asymmetry.

The Effects of Depression and Anti-Depressants on Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction: A Post-Hoc Analysis.

BackgroundA personal history of depression prior to breast cancer diagnosis and its effect on post-diagnosis quality of life (QOL) in women undergoing breast reconstruction is relatively unknown. We performed the current study to determine if depression alters QOL for patients who undergo breast reconstruction by assessing the pre-to-post-operative change in patient-reported BREAST-Q scores.MethodologyWe conducted a single-center, post-hoc analysis of 300 patients with completed BREAST-Q data who underwent breast reconstruction from November 2013 to November 2016 following a diagnosis of breast cancer. Patients completed the BREAST-Q at four time points: pre-operatively, six weeks following tissue expander (TE) insertion for patients undergoing staged reconstruction, and six and 12 months following the final reconstruction. Medical records were reviewed to identify patients who had a pre-cancer diagnosis of clinical depression and/or anti-depressant medication use. BREAST-Q scores were compared between groups and within groups. Groups compared were the depression (n = 50) and no depression (n = 250) patients, along with anti-depressant (n = 36) and no anti-depressant (n = 14) use in the depression group.ResultsWithin-group Sexual Well-being scores at the six-week post-TE follow-up for patients in the depression group (median = 37, interquartile range [IQR] = 25-47) were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than the scores for patients in the no depression group (median = 47, IQR = 39-60). There were no statistically significant differences in BREAST-Q scores in other domains. When compared to patients diagnosed with depression who were not taking anti-depressants, anti-depressant medication use did not result in statistically significant higher BREAST-Q scores, although Satisfaction With Breasts six months post-operatively, Psychosocial Well-being at six weeks post-TE, Sexual Well-being at six weeks post-TE and six months post-operatively were clinically higher in patients taking anti-depressants for depression.ConclusionsPatients with a diagnosis of depression prior to breast cancer had lower BREAST-Q Sexual Well-being scores in the six-week TE group with or without anti-depressant medication. Patients with a pre-cancer diagnosis of depression considering TEs may benefit from additional counseling prior to breast reconstruction or electing a different method of breast reconstruction. Anti-depressant medications may provide clinically higher BREAST-Q scores in patients with a pre-cancer diagnosis of depression. Adding an anti-depressant medication to a patient’s treatment plan may provide additional benefits. Larger samples are required to properly determine the impact of anti-depressant medications on BREAST-Q scores in patients with a pre-cancer diagnosis of depression.

Ischemic Complications After Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Implant-based Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has a higher incidence of mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) than skin-sparing mastectomy. The purpose of this study is to analyze predisposing factors for nipple and skin necrosis after bilateral NSM with immediate implant reconstruction. Sixty-two consecutive patients (124 breasts) from a single breast/plastic surgeon underwent bilateral NSM with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were included. Factors influencing MSFN were analyzed. The mean age was 45.7 years, and mean body mass index was 22.9. Reconstructive methods were as follows: tissue expander (TE), 76 (61.3%); and direct to implant, 48 (38.7%). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis occurred in 39 (31.5%) breasts, nipple necrosis 38 and skin flap necrosis 19. Thirty-seven breasts healed uneventfully, and 2 (1.6%) required reoperation. Cancer pathology, mastectomy weight greater than 279 g, TE reconstruction, and nipple-notch (N-N) distance greater than 23 cm were predictive of nipple necrosis on univariate analysis. The mean mastectomy weight (380.1 g vs 220.7 g, P < 0.0001), N-N distance greater than 23 cm (30 vs 0, P < 0.0001), and mean implant size (490 cm3 vs 373 cm3, P < 0.0001) were greater in the TE group. On logistic regression model controlling for all significant variables, predictors of MSFN were as follows: diagnosis of cancer (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-8.03; P = 0.006), TE reconstruction (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.03-8.03; P = 0.04), and N-N distance (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.66; P = 0.03). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis after NSM and implant reconstruction is common. In this series, only 2 (1.6%) cases required surgical intervention with no implant loss. Treatment of breast cancer, TE reconstruction, and increasing N-N notch distance were positive predictors of MSFN.

Is Tissue Expansion Worth It? Comparative Outcomes of Skin-preserving versus Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Background:The requirement for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) at the time of mastectomy is often unknown. Autologous reconstruction is preferred in the setting of radiotherapy by providing healthy vascularized tissue to the chest. To maximize mastectomy skin preservation, tissue expander (TE) placement maintains the breast pocket until definitive reconstruction. This study aims to compare outcomes of skin-preserving delayed versus standard delayed autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of PMRT.Methods:A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed of two patient cohorts at a single center between 2006 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were locally advanced breast cancer patients who completed PMRT and free autologous reconstruction. Primary outcomes were major intraoperative and postoperative TE and flap complications.Results:Over 10 years, 241 patients underwent mastectomy and PMRT. Standard delayed autologous breast reconstruction was performed in 131 breasts (non-TE group). Skin-preserving delayed autologous reconstruction was performed in 113 breasts (TE group). The TE group was associated with a higher incidence of intraoperative complications during flap reconstruction (P = 0.002) and had a higher venous thrombosis incidence than the non-TE cohort (P = 0.007). Other major postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. TE patients had 7.5 times higher risk of intraoperative complications and an 18.6% TE loss rate.Conclusions:We identified higher intraoperative flap complications and a high rate of TE loss in patients who underwent skin-preserving delayed autologous breast reconstruction. The benefit of mastectomy skin preservation needs to be weighed against the increased risk of TE loss and higher rates of flap thrombosis.

Prepectoral 2-stage Breast Reconstruction with Carbon Dioxide Tissue Expansion.

Background:Roughly 80% of patients undergoing mastectomy in the United States opt for reconstruction with implants. The introduction of acellular dermal matrices has allowed for placement of breast prostheses in the prepectoral plane, while a new carbon dioxide tissue expander (TE) (AeroForm) allows for needle-free, patient-controlled expansion. These 2 novel technologies have ushered in a new patient-centered era of breast reconstruction, with the possibility of reducing patient morbidity for the first time in decades. We hypothesize that AeroForm expanders placed in the prepectoral plane reduce time to second-stage reconstruction, reduce the number of clinic visits, and have lower complications than traditional saline TEs.Methods:This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing breast mastectomy and TE placement in the prepectoral plane over a 21-month period (169 patients, 267 breasts), comparing AeroForm expanders to TEs.Results:The AeroForm group (n = 57) had a shorter period to second-stage reconstruction than the TE group (n = 210) (135.4 versus 181.7 days; P = 0.01) and required fewer clinic visits (5.1 versus 6.9; P < 0.01). Partial thickness (25.6% versus 12.3%, P = 0.03) and full thickness (8.7% versus 0.0%, P = 0.02) necrosis were more common in the saline cohort. The rates of infection, hematoma, and seroma requiring drainage were not statistically significant between the 2 groups.Conclusions:Two-staged breast reconstruction with the use of AeroForm expanders in the prepectoral space marks progress in improving care for breast cancer patients by demonstrating a reduction in some adverse events, the number of clinic visits, and the time to second-stage reconstruction.

Hemoptysis from complex pulmonary aspergilloma treated by cavernostomy and thoracoplasty

BackgroundIn high-risk patients with complex pulmonary aspergilloma but unable for lung resection, cavernostomy and thoracoplasty could be performed. This study aimed to evaluate this surgery compared two compressing materials.MethodsA total of 63 in high-risk patients who suffered from hemoptysis due to complex pulmonary aspergilloma and underwent cavernostomy and thoracoplasty surgery from November 2011 to September 2018 at Pham Ngoc Thach hospital were evaluated prospectively studied. Patients were allocated to two groups: the table tennis ball group and tissue expander group. We evaluated at the time of before operation, 6 months and 24 months after operation.ResultsTuberculosis was the most common comorbidity diseases in both groups. Upper lobe occupied almost in location. Hemoptysis symptoms plunged from time to time. Statistically significant Karnofsky score was observed in both groups. Postoperative pulmonary functions (FVC and FEV1) have remained in both groups at all time points. The remarkable results were no deaths related to surgery and low complications both short and long-term. There was no statistical significance between two groups in operative time, blood loss during operation, ICU length-stay time. Four patients died because of co-morbidity in 24 months follow-up.ConclusionCavernostomy and thoracoplasty was safe and effective surgery for the treatment of complex pulmonary aspergilloma with hemoptysis in high-risk patients. No mortality related to surgery and low complications were recorded. The was no inferiority when compared two compressing materials .

Autologus Hair Transplantation Vs Skin Expansion in Management of Cicatricial Alopecia; A Comparative Study

Background: The bad impact of cicatricial alopecia among population lead to increase the desire of correction of that type of hair loss. Although, there are many methods of hair restoration but the efficacy of each, indications and possible hazards has not yet been clearly identified. Objective: To compare between hair transplantation using follicular unit extraction and skin expansion surgeries in the field of hair restoration in secondary cicatricial alopecia regarding aesthetic outcome, operative duration, optimum patient selection and complications of both techniques. Subjects and methods: Twenty four patients suffering from alopecia were involved in this study 15 males (62.5%) and 9 females (37.5%). Patient’s age ranged from 7 to 26 years old. Patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure done. Group (A) 12 patients done hair transplantation surgeries. Group (B) 12 patients done scalp expansion surgeries. Results: There was a non-significant difference between both groups regarding the mean age or the mean operation duration (P > 0.05). The mean values of the surface area of alopecia, in tissue expander group (B) was significantly larger than that of hair transplantation in group (A) (P < 0.001). However the time since exposure to the causative injury was significantly longer in group (A) than that of group (B) (P < 0.01). Hair transplantation tends to have less recovery time highly indicated in adults with smaller non-dependent areas of alopecia, while expanders with long recovery period solve bigger problems of alopecia in younger patients. Conclusion: Multiple factors interfere with the surgical plan age, gender, occupation, size and site of alopecia and time since injury. Both hair transplantation and skin expansion are very useful in the field of cicatricial alopecia treatment. While hair transplantation has less hazards during anesthesia, less post-operative scars and less recovery time, skin expansion is a good solution for bigger problems like big area of alopecia or younger patients.

Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Compared with Tissue-expander Breast Reconstruction: Rate of Infection.

Background:The risk of infection continues to be a subject of discussion within the field of implant-based breast reconstruction. Studies have shown the feasibility of immediate single-stage procedures with acellular dermal matrix (ADM), yet 2-stage tissue expander techniques continue to be the procedure most often performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative infections and to identify associated predictors.Methods:A retrospective study at Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital was conducted between 2013 and 2017. Patients’ demographic data were compared between single-stage and 2-stage procedures. Rate of infection and predictors were examined. Minor infections could be treated by oral antibiotics only, major infections required inpatient treatment. Healing was considered a successful treatment with antibiotics only, whereas any supplementary surgical intervention resulting in the preservation of an implant device was considered salvage. Breast reconstruction was defined a failure in case of implant loss or need for autologous reconstruction.Results:Three hundred ninety-three patients underwent 336 monolateral and 57 bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Ninety-two patients had a submuscular direct-to-implant reconstruction with ADM with an infection rate of 11.4% compared with an infection rate of 7.8% among the 268 patients with a 2-stage tissue expander procedure. Beta-binomial regression showed obesity and preoperative radiotherapy as significant predictors for infection (OR, 4.65, P = 0.038, and OR, 7.13, P = 0.015, respectively). Average time of onset of infection among the submuscular direct-to-implant with ADM group was 67.1 days compared with 80.1 days among tissue-expander group with postoperative chemotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy having a significant effect on time of infection onset (P = 0.014, P = 0.034, respectively).Conclusions:Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with ADM is a procedure with acceptable risks of infection in comparison to tissue expander procedures. A profound patient selection pre- and intraoperatively is the basis of successful breast reconstruction.

Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study.

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy plays an active role in improving the quality-of-life (QoL) and alleviating the psychological trauma of breast cancer patients, and has become an indispensable part of the comprehensive treatment in breast cancer. However, compared with mastectomy alone, breast reconstruction also increase operative complications. The surgical, oncological outcomes, and cosmetic effect of breast reconstruction remains to be evaluated. Data for patients with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy from February 2009 to November 2015 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, with a median follow-up time of 44 months. The operating time, blood loss, drainage fluid, postoperative complications, postoperative cosmesis, oncological outcomes, and QoL were evaluated and compared between different reconstruction types. A total of 151 women were included. The flap-based group had higher complication rates of marginal necrosis of incision, while the incidence of capsular contracture was higher in immediate implant group. There was no difference in blood loss, drainage fluid, and other postoperative complications. Several independent factors were associated with increased postoperative complications included diabetic, obese, and reconstruction with flap. There was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate between different surgical groups. In terms of cosmetic effect, patients in the tissue expander group were more likely to get a satisfactory postoperative breast appearance. QoL outcomes shown that the tissue expander group has better body image and sexual enjoyment, while there was no significant difference for other QoL domains. In conclusion, different methods of breast reconstruction are safe and feasible for patients with breast cancer, tissue expander implantation following delayed implant breast reconstruction is a more effective treatment on cosmetic and QoL outcomes.

Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.

Women who have undergone prior augmentation mammoplasty represent a unique subset of breast cancer patients with several options available for breast reconstruction. We performed a single institution review of surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction performed in patients with breast cancer with prior history of subpectoral breast augmentation. Institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted among patients with previously mentioned criteria treated at our institution between 2000 and 2014. Reconstructions were grouped into 2 categories as follows: (1) removal of preexisting subpectoral implant during mastectomy with immediate tissue expander placement and (2) implant-sparing mastectomy followed by delayed exchange to a larger implant. We reviewed demographics, tumor features, and reconstruction outcomes of these groups. Fifty-three patients had preexisting subpectoral implants. Of the 63 breast reconstructions performed, 18 (28.6%) had immediate tissue expander placed and 45 (71.4%) had implant-sparing mastectomy followed by delayed implant exchange. The groups were comparable based on age, body mass index, cancer type, tumor grade, TNM stage at presentation, and hormonal receptor status. No significant difference was noted between tumor margins or subsequent recurrence, mastectomy specimen weight, removed implant volume, volume of implant placed during reconstruction, or time from mastectomy to final implant placement. Rates of complications were significantly higher in the tissue expander group compared to the implant-sparing mastectomy group 7 (38.9%) versus 4 (8.9%) (P = 0.005). Implant-sparing mastectomy with delayed implant exchange in patients with preexisting subpectoral implants is safe and has fewer complications compared to tissue expander placement. There was no difference noted in the final volume of implant placed, time interval for final implant placement, or tumor margins.

The Timing of Breast Irradiation in Two-Stage Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Certain patients who initiate expander/implant (E/I) reconstruction following mastectomy may require radiation therapy (XRT). XRT may be delivered during the tissue expander (TE) expansion process or after exchange for a permanent implant (PI). We studied a series of women treated with E/I reconstruction and XRT to determine whether there is a difference in complication rates between those who had XRT to the TE versus PI. All two-stage E/I reconstructions at our institution from April 2005 to January 2013 were reviewed to identify patients who underwent XRT after TE placement. Our database was queried for reconstructive details, oncologic treatment, and complications. Statistical analyses were performed to establish significance of complication rate differences. Fifty-two patients underwent XRT after TE placement, 42 of which had XRT to the TE and 11 of which had XRT to the PI. The major complication rates (complications requiring emergent reoperation/readmission) were 27% versus 0% (p = 0.05) for XRT to the TE versus XRT to the PI, but there were no significant differences in minor complication rates (outpatient complications). Specifically, the rates of Grade 3/4 capsular contracture were similar between the two groups, 27% for the XRT to the TE group and 36% for the XRT to the PI group. Radiation of the PI versus radiation of the TE did not result in significant differences in overall surgical complication rates but had fewer major complications and no implant failures. Other factors must also be considered, such as patient preference, risk of cancer reoccurrence, and cosmesis. It is essential for a patient to have a team of a plastic surgeon and radiation, surgical, and medical oncologists working together to achieve each patient's goals.

Applications of endoscopic surgery in pediatric patients.

Although the advent of endoscopic technology is expanding the fields of reconstructive and aesthetic surgery in adults, there have been few reports of the use of this technology in the pediatric population. Because of their minimally invasive nature, yet wide range of exposure, endoscopic techniques have much appeal for this age group. Here we present our experience with endoscopic pediatric plastic surgery. From February of 1995 to August of 1997, 104 patients underwent 139 procedures utilizing 5- and 10-mm endoscopes. There were 58 male and 46 female patients. The mean age at surgery was 5.6 years (range, 3 weeks to 19 years). The most common type of procedures performed were insertion of tissue expanders (n = 34), excision of benign head and neck masses (n = 27), torticollis release (n = 20), excision of vascular lesions (n = 13), and miscellaneous procedures, (n = 10). There were 26 complications in 139 procedures (19 percent). Seventeen (65 percent) were in the tissue expander group. The rest were scattered among the groups with other diagnoses. Although there did not appear to be a specific type of complication associated with endoscopy, 77 percent occurred in the first 2 months of our study. This suggests a relatively steep technical learning curve. These results demonstrate that endoscopic techniques are eminently applicable in the pediatric population, providing the benefits of small and remote incisional wounds, with complication rates that are comparable with those of conventional open surgical treatment.

Endoscopic pediatric plastic surgery.

Although the advent of endoscopic technology is expanding the fields of reconstructive and aesthetic surgery in adults, there have been to date no reports of its use in the pediatric population. Because of its minimally invasive nature, yet wide range of exposure, endoscopic techniques have much appeal in this age group. Herein we present our initial experience with endoscopic pediatric plastic surgery. From February 1995 to December 1995, 41 patients were treated utilizing 5-mm and 10-mm endoscopes at Scottish Rite Children's Medical Center, Atlanta, GA. There were 19 males and 22 females. The mean age at surgery was 5.6 years (range, 7 months-15 years). The most common types of procedures performed were insertion of tissue expanders (N = 19), excision of facial dermoids (N = 7), torticollis release (N = 5), and excision of vascular lesions (N = 4). The remaining 6 patients underwent a variety of reconstructive procedures. The complication rate in the tissue expander group was 3 out of 39 expanders inserted (9.5%), and consisted of infection (N = 2) and rupture (N = 1). In the dermoid group, complications consisted of wound infection requiring reoperation (N = 1), and transient frontal paresis (N = 1). One patient in the hemangioma group had an incomplete resection necessitating open excision. The remaining patients all had satisfactory outcomes with no complications. The majority of the procedures were done on an outpatient basis. These results suggest that endoscopic techniques are eminently applicable in the pediatric population, providing the benefits of small and remote incisional wounds with complication rates that are comparable to those of conventional surgical treatment.