Tipranavir/ritonavir Research Articles

2.0 Recommendations and auditable outcomes

2.0 Recommendations and auditable outcomes

Boosted Tipranavir versus Darunavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients

Background: The POTENT trial compared the safety and efficacy of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), each with an optimized background regimen (OBR) in triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients with resistance to more than one protease inhibitor (PI).Methodology/Principal Findings: POTENT was a prospective, open-label study of triple-class (PI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTI], nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTI]), treatment-experienced, HIVpositive patients. Subjects were randomized to either TPV/r (500/200mg twice daily) or DRV/r (600/100mg twice daily) on a genotype-guided, investigatorselected OBR. CD4+ counts andHIV viral loads were assayed at key timepoints. The primary endpoint was time to virologic failure (viral load >-500 copies/mL).POTENT was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. Thirty-nine patients were treated with either TPV/r (n= 19) or DRV/r (n= 20); 82% were male, 77%White, with mean age of 43.6 years. Mean baselineHIV RNA was 3.9 log10 copies/mL.Median prior antiretrovirals was 11, with no prior raltegravir or maraviroc exposure. Raltegravir was the most common novel class agent in the OBRs (n = 14 TPV/r; n = 12DRV/r). In both groups, patients achieved mean viral load decreases >-2 log10 copies/mL by week 8, and by week 12 mean CD4+ counts rose by 40–50 cells/mm3. Total observation time was 32 weeks. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 21% (TPV/r) and 25% (DRV/r) of patients.Conclusions/Significance: TPV/r- and DRV/r-based regimens showed similar short-term safety and efficacy. These data support the use of next-generation PIs such as tipranavir or darunavir with novel class antiretroviral agents (integrase inhibitors, CCR5 antagonists, or fusion inhibitors).Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00517192

Effects of Tipranavir, Darunavir, and Ritonavir on Platelet Function, Coagulation, and Fibrinolysis in Healthy Volunteers

The use of HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) as part of antiretroviral therapy in the treatment of HIV-1 infection may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. This prospective, randomized, open-label trial in healthy volunteers compared the effects of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r), darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), and ritonavir (RTV) alone on platelet aggregation after a single dose and at steady-state concentrations. Subjects were selected on the basis of normal platelet aggregation and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation inhibition after administration of a single 325-mg dose of aspirin. All 3 PI therapies were administered twice daily for 10 days.In some but not all subjects, TPV/r inhibited AA-induced platelet aggregation and prolonged PFA-100® closure time with collagen-epinephrine cartridge, which was of lesser magnitude and consistency compared with aspirin, but greater when compared to DRV/r and RTV. At least 2 subjects in each treatment arm showed complete inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation on treatment, and the magnitude of change in all platelet-function tests did not correlate with PI plasma concentrations. Effects of TPV/r on platelet aggregation were reversed 24 hours after the last TPV/r dose. None of the PI treatments tested were associated with increases in bleeding time, decreases in plasma coagulation factors, or increase in fibrinolysis. There was large inter-patient variability in antiplatelet effect for all PI treatments, ranging from no effect to complete inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation.

A Phenotype–Genotype Approach to Predicting CYP450 and P-Glycoprotein Drug Interactions With the Mixed Inhibitor/Inducer Tipranavir/Ritonavir

The effects of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) on hepatic and intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activity were evaluated in 23 volunteers. The subjects received oral (p.o.) caffeine, warfarin + vitamin K, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, and midazolam and digoxin (p.o. and intravenous (i.v.)) at baseline, during the first three doses of TPV/r (500 mg/200 mg b.i.d.), and at steady state. Plasma area under the curve (AUC)(0-infinity) and urinary metabolite ratios were used for quantification of protein activities. A single dose of TPV/r had no effect on the activity of CYP1A2 and CYP2C9; it weakly inhibited CYP2C19 and P-gp; and it potently inhibited CYP2D6 and CYP3A. Multiple dosing produced weak induction of CYP1A2, moderate induction of CYP2C19, potent induction of intestinal P-gp, and potent inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP3A, with no significant effects on CYP2C9 and hepatic P-gp. Several P450/transporter single-nucleotide polymorphisms correlated with the baseline phenotype but not with the extent of inhibition or induction. Although mixed induction and inhibition are present, this approach offers an understanding of drug interaction mechanisms and ultimately assists in optimizing the clinical use of TPV/r.

Lack of Effect of Efavirenz on the Pharmacokinetics of Tipranavir-Ritonavir in Healthy Volunteers

Previously it has been shown that tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) does not affect efavirenz (EFV) plasma concentrations. This study investigates the effect of steady-state EFV on steady-state TPV/r pharmacokinetics. This was a single-center, open-label, multiple-dose study of healthy adult female and male volunteers. TPV/r 500/200 mg twice a day (BID) was given with food for 24 days. After dosing with TPV/r for 10 days, EFV 600 mg once a day was added to the regimen. Intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was done on days 10 and 24. Validated bioanalytical high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods were used to determine plasma tipranavir (TPV), ritonavir (RTV), and EFV concentrations. Thirty-four subjects were entered into the study, and 16 subjects completed it. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for TPV and RTV area under the curves, C(max)s, and C(min)s comparing TPV/r alone and in combination with EFV were 0.97 (0.87 to 1.09), 0.92 (0.81 to 1.03), and 1.19 (0.93 to 1.54) for TPV and 1.03 (0.78 to 1.38), 0.92 (0.65 to 1.30), and 1.04 (0.72 to 1.48) for RTV. Frequently observed adverse events were diarrhea, headache, dizziness, abnormal dreams, and rash. EFV had no effect on the steady-state PK of TPV or RTV, with the exception of a 19% increase in the TPV C(min), which is not clinically relevant. TPV/r can be safely coadministered with EFV and without the need for a dose adjustment.

Differential Effects of Tipranavir plus Ritonavir on Atorvastatin or Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers

To identify pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) and rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, we conducted two prospective, open-label, single-arm, two-period studies. The geometric mean (GM) ratio was 1.37 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 1.62) for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for rosuvastatin and 2.23 (90% CI, 1.83 to 2.72) for the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) for rosuvastatin with TPV/r at steady state versus alone. The GM ratio was 9.36 (90% CI, 8.02 to 10.94) for the AUC of atorvastatin and 8.61 (90% CI, 7.25 to 10.21) for the Cmax of atorvastatin with TPV/r at steady state versus alone. Tipranavir PK parameters were not affected by single-dose rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. Mild gastrointestinal intolerance, headache, and mild reversible liver enzyme elevations (grade 1 and 2) were the most commonly reported adverse drug reactions. Based on these interactions, we recommend low initial doses of rosuvastatin (5 mg) and atorvastatin (10 mg), with careful clinical monitoring of rosuvastatin- or atorvastatin-related adverse events when combined with TPV/r.

Multidrug-experienced HIV-1-infected women demonstrated similar virological and immunological responses to tipranavir/ritonavir compared with men

Gender-related differences in the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir [tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) 500/200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)] were evaluated in a subanalysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multidrug Resistant Patients with Tipranavir (RESIST) trials. Data from HIV-1-infected women (203; TPV/r = 117) and men (1280; TPV/r = 629) showed no significant gender-related differences in HIV RNA response rates (at 48 weeks) and safety (at 96 weeks) despite higher mean steady-state plasma TPV trough concentrations in women. Significantly greater increases in CD4 cell count (+81.2 vs. +48.6; P = 0.0012) were observed in women at week 48.

Interaction Studies of Tipranavir-Ritonavir with Clarithromycin, Fluconazole, and Rifabutin in Healthy Volunteers

Three separate controlled, two-period studies with healthy volunteers assessed the pharmacokinetic interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) in a 500/200-mg dose and 500 mg of clarithromycin (CLR), 100 mg of fluconazole (FCZ), or 150 mg of rifabutin (RFB). The CLR study was conducted with 24 subjects. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI; given in parentheses) of the areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC), the maximum concentrations of the drugs in serum (C(max)), and the concentrations in serum at 12 h postdose (Cp12h) for multiple-dose TPV/r and multiple-dose CLR, indicating the effect of TPV/r on the CLR parameters, were 1.19 (1.04-1.37), 0.95 (0.83-1.09), and 1.68 (1.42-1.98), respectively. The formation of the metabolite 14-OH-CLR was decreased by 95% in the presence of TPV, and the TPV AUC increased 66% compared to that for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative historical controls. The FCZ study was conducted with 20 subjects. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp24h, indicating the effect of multiple-dose TPV/r on the multiple-dose FCZ parameters, were 0.92 (0.88-0.95), 0.94 (0.91-0.98), and 0.89 (0.85-0.92), respectively. The TPV AUC increased by 50% compared to that for HIV-negative historical controls. The RFB study was conducted with 24 subjects. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp12h for multiple-dose TPV/r and single-dose RFB, indicating the effect of TPV/r on the RFB parameters, were 2.90 (2.59-3.26), 1.70 (1.49-1.94), and 2.14 (1.90-2.41), respectively. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp12h of TPV/r and RFB with 25-O-desacetyl-RFB were 4.33 (3.86-4.86), 1.86 (1.63-2.12), and 2.76 (2.44-3.12), respectively. Coadministration of TPV with a single dose of RFB resulted in a 16% increase in the TPV Cp12h compared to that for TPV alone. In the general population, no dose adjustments are necessary for the combination of TPV/r and CLR or FCZ. Combining TPV/r with RFB should be done with caution, while toxicity and RFB drug levels should be monitored. Study medications were generally well-tolerated in these studies.

Intracranial Hemorrhage and Liver-Associated Deaths Associated with Tipranavir/Ritonavir: Review of Cases from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System

Tipranavir (TPV), a protease inhibitor, has box warnings for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure and death). A box warning is a labeling statement about serious adverse events leading to significant injury and/or death. A box warning is the most serious warning placed in the labeling of a prescription medication. As a result of the respective morbidity and mortality associated with ICH and hepatic failure, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was searched for reports of these adverse events in HIV-infected patients receiving a tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen. This search comprised part of the FDA's safety analysis for traditional approval. From July 2006 to March 2007, 10 cases of ICH were identified in AERS. From June 2005 to March 2007, 12 cases of liver-associated deaths were identified. One patient experienced liver failure and fatal ICH. Most patients with these events had additional risk factors. Among patients with liver-associated deaths, 3 had HIV-RNA less than 400 copies per milliliter at the time of hepatic failure. Among 10 patients who discontinued TPV/r when hepatic failure developed, median number of days post-TPV/r to death was 23 (range, 2-69 days). Review of AERS did not identify new safety concerns regarding ICH. Among most patients with liver-associated deaths, death appears to occur soon after hepatic failure develops. If considering TPV/r, careful assessment of risk/benefit is suggested for patients at risk for ICH and hepatic failure.

Tipranavir-Ritonavir Genotypic Resistance Score in Protease Inhibitor-Experienced Patients

To identify mutations associated with the virological response (VR) to a tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen, 143 patients previously treated with protease inhibitor (PI) were studied. VR was defined by a decrease of at least 1 log(10) in, or undetectable, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA at month 3. The effect of each mutation in the protease, considering all variants at a residue as a single variable, on the VR to TPV/r was investigated. Mutations at six residues were associated with a lower VR (E35D/G/K/N, M36I/L/V, Q58E, Q61D/E/G/H/N/R, H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y, and L89I/M/R/T/V), and one mutation was associated with a higher VR (F53L/W/Y). The genotypic score M36I/L/V-53L/W/Y + Q58E + H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y + L89I/M/R/T/V was selected as providing a strong association with VR. For the seven patients with a genotypic score of -1 (viruses with only mutation at codon 53), the percentage of responders was 100% and the percentages were 79%, 56%, 33%, 21%, and 0% for those with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The percentage of patients showing a response to TPV/r was lower for patients infected with non-clade B viruses (n = 16, all non-B subtypes considered together) than for those infected with clade B viruses (n = 127) (25% and 59%, respectively; P = 0.015). Most mutations associated with VR to TPV/r had not previously been associated with PI resistance. This is consistent with phenotypic analysis showing that TPV has a unique resistance profile. Mutations at five positions (35, 36, 61, 69, and 89) were observed significantly more frequently in patients infected with a non-B subtype than in those infected with the B subtype, probably explaining the lower VR observed in these patients.

Hepatic safety of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy: effect of hepatitis virus co-infection and baseline liver fibrosis

Address: 1Hospital Univ. de Valme, Seville, Spain, 2Hospital Univ. Carlos de Haya, Malaga, Spain, 3Hospital Univ. Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain, 4Hospital Univ. Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain, 5Hospital Univ. Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain, 6Hospital General Univ. de Alicante, Alicante, Spain, 7Hospital Univ. Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain, 8Hospital Univ. San Cecilio, Granada, Spain and 9Hospital Univ. Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain * Corresponding author

Efficacy And Safety of Three Doses of Tipranavir Boosted with Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced HIV Type 1-Infected Patients

The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of three doses of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) in highly treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients with protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant isolates were evaluated. A 24-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial was conducted. All patients were three-drug class experienced and had taken at least two PI-based regimens. All had at least one primary PI mutation and had plasma HIV-RNA > 1000 copies/ml. Patients remained on their background non-PI antiretroviral medications for the first 14 days. After this 14-day period of functional TPV/r monotherapy, the background antiretroviral medications were optimized based on treatment history and the screening genotype. A total of 216 patients were randomized. All groups [TPV/r 500 mg/100 mg (n = 73), 500 mg/200 mg (n = 72), and 750 mg/200 mg (n = 71) twice daily] achieved an approximate 1 log10 reduction in the median HIV-RNA at week 2. A significant reduction was sustained through 24 weeks in the TPV/r 500 mg/200 mg and 750 mg/200 mg groups. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved optimal median TPV trough concentrations and lower interpatient variability. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and headache. The TPV/r 750 mg/200 mg group had the highest rate of grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and study discontinuations due to AEs. All doses of TPV/r tested in this study were associated with HIV-1 viral load reductions through 24 weeks. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved the best efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile in this highly treatment-experienced population and was selected for the pivotal phase 3 studies.

Concomitant Use of an Active Boosted Protease Inhibitor with Enfuvirtide in Treatment-Experienced, HIV-Infected Individuals: Recent Data and Consensus Recommendations

Recent data from clinical trials investigating the efficacy of enfuvirtide, a fusion inhibitor, in treatment-experienced patients have revealed that the addition of enfuvirtide (ENF) to an active boosted protease inhibitor regimen doubles the rate of virological response. At week 48 of the TORO studies, 55% of patients previously naive to and receiving lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) with ENF achieved a viral load of <400 copies/mL compared with 24% of patients treated with LPV/r alone. At week 24 of the RESIST studies, 70% of previously ENF-naive patients who took both ENF and tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) achieved a ≥1 log10 reduction in viral load compared with 37% of such patients treated with TPV/r alone. Similarly, concomitant use of TMC114/ritonavir (TMC114/r) with ENF, compared with TMC114/r alone, increased the number of patients with <50 copies/mL from 46% to 64% in a combined 24-week analysis from the POWER trials. Data from these trials suggest that combining one agent from a new class with a new agent from a previously exposed class offers a greater chance of achieving full virological control than either type of agent alone. Undetectable viraemia should be the primary objective for treatment-experienced patients requiring a switch in therapy, and the present data support the combination of an active boosted protease inhibitor with an agent from a new class (e.g., ENF) for triple-class-experienced patients.

Concomitant Use of an Active Boosted Protease Inhibitor with Enfuvirtide in Treatment-Experienced, HIV-Infected Individuals: Recent Data and Consensus Recommendations

Recent data from clinical trials investigating the efficacy of enfuvirtide, a fusion inhibitor, in treatment-experienced patients have revealed that the addition of enfuvirtide (ENF) to an active boosted protease inhibitor regimen doubles the rate of virological response. At week 48 of the TORO studies, 55% of patients previously naive to and receiving lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) with ENF achieved a viral load of <400 copies/mL compared with 24% of patients treated with LPV/r alone. At week 24 of the RESIST studies, 70% of previously ENF-naive patients who took both ENF and tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) achieved a ≥1 log10 reduction in viral load compared with 37% of such patients treated with TPV/r alone. Similarly, concomitant use of TMC114/ritonavir (TMC114/r) with ENF, compared with TMC114/r alone, increased the number of patients with <50 copies/mL from 46% to 64% in a combined 24-week analysis from the POWER trials. Data from these trials suggest that combining one agent from a new class with a new agent from a previously exposed class offers a greater chance of achieving full virological control than either type of agent alone. Undetectable viraemia should be the primary objective for treatment-experienced patients requiring a switch in therapy, and the present data support the combination of an active boosted protease inhibitor with an agent from a new class (e.g., ENF) for triple-class-experienced patients.