Tiotropium In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Research Articles

Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data.

BackgroundThe influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery through ELLIPTA DPI at PIF ≥30 L/min. This analysis of two clinical trials and a real-world population of COPD patients determined spirometric PIF distribution, and explored the relationship between PIF and outcomes in the trials.MethodsThe replicate Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind 207608/207609 (NCT03478683/NCT03478696) trials evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol via ELLIPTA DPI versus budesonide/formoterol+tiotropium in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis assessed spirometric PIF distribution at screening and relationship between PIF and lung function outcomes in the pooled 207608/207609 population. Spirometric PIF distributions in a real-world population of COPD patients were evaluated by retrospective analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) database to assess similarities between clinical trial and real-world populations.ResultsA total of 1460 (207608/207609) and 3282 (KPNW) patients were included. There was considerable overlap between spirometric PIF distributions for both populations. Overall, 99.7% and 99.8% of the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations, respectively, reported spirometric PIF ≥50 L/min, estimated as equivalent to ELLIPTA PIFR ≥30 L/min. In the 207608/207609 combined analysis, there was no significant interaction between spirometric PIF and treatment for lung function endpoints, indicating treatment effect is independent of PIF.ConclusionNearly all COPD patients in the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations achieved spirometric PIF values estimated as equivalent to PIFR of ≥30 L/min through the ELLIPTA DPI. Lack of correlation between spirometric PIF at screening and treatment efficacy aligns with consistent dose performance from the ELLIPTA DPI across a wide range of PIFs, achieved by patients with COPD of all severities.

Do we really need asthma–chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome?

The association of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the same patient, which is designated as mixed asthma-COPD phenotype or overlap syndrome (ACOS), remains a controversial issue. This is primarily because many conflicting aspects in the definition of ACOS remain, and it is extremely difficult to summarize the distinctive features of this syndrome. Furthermore, we are realizing that asthma, COPD, and ACOS are not single diseases but rather syndromes consisting of several endotypes and phenotypes and, consequently, comprising a spectrum of diseases. The umbrella term ACOS blurs the lines between asthma and COPD and allows an approach that simplifies therapy. However, this approach contradicts the modern concept according to which we must move toward more targeted and personalized therapies to treat patients with these diseases. Therefore we argue that the term ACOS must be abandoned and ultimately replaced when new phenotypes and underlying endotypes are identified and a new taxonomy of airway diseases is generated.

Pharmacological assessment of the onset of action of aclidinium and glycopyrronium versus tiotropium in COPD patients and human isolated bronchi

Preclinical studies suggested that aclidinium and glycopyrronium might have a faster onset of action than tiotropium. In this study we assessed the onset of action of aclidinium and glycopyrronium versus tiotropium, all administered at the approved clinical doses, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in human isolated bronchi by using different concentrations. Sixteen COPD patients inhaled single doses of aclidinium 400µg, glycopyrronium 50μg and tiotropium 18µg and FEV1 was measured to assess their onset of action. In human isolated bronchi the time to evoke half maximal relaxation of transmural stimulation was tested from 10nM to 1µM for each drug. Nine, eight and twelve patients did not achieve 15% increase of FEV1 after inhalation of aclidinium, glycopyrronium and tiotropium, respectively. Aclidinium (15.6±7.5min) and glycopyrronium (17.9±10.4min) enhanced 15% FEV1 more rapidly than tiotropium (42.5±19.4min), with no significant difference (P>0.05). In isolated airways, glycopyrronium elicited a dose-dependent onset of action (10nM: 8.2±1.3min, 100nM: 7.1±2.1min, 1μM: 3.4±0.4min) that was faster compared to that induced by aclidinium (1μM: 6.4±0.5min) and tiotropium (1μM: 8.4±1.1min) (P<0.05), that halved the contractile tone only at the highest concentration. Bronchodilation induced by aclidinium and glycopyrronium was faster than that induced by tiotropium, but since our analysis was restricted to the acute effect of these LAMAs and the inhaled doses were not isoeffective, the real differences in their impact on the onset of bronchodilation will be definitely determined after a long-term challenge of these treatments at isoeffective doses in COPD patients.

Efficacy and safety of indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD patients according to dyspnoea severity

BackgroundGuidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend that treatment choices be based partly on symptoms. MethodsA post-hoc analysis of pooled data from clinical studies compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily inhaled bronchodilators indacaterol (150 and 300 μg) and open-label tiotropium (18 μg) according to baseline dyspnoea severity on the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale in patients with COPD (mMRC scores <2 = ‘less dyspnoea’; scores ≥2 = ‘more dyspnoea’). Outcomes were assessed after 26 weeks. ResultsThe analysis included 3177 patients. In patients with less dyspnoea: indacaterol (both doses) improved 24-h post-dose (‘trough’) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), transition dyspnoea index (TDI) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores at week 26 and reduced the risk of COPD exacerbations vs placebo; and open-label tiotropium improved trough FEV1 and TDI total score vs placebo at week 26. In patients with more dyspnoea: indacaterol (both doses) improved trough FEV1, TDI and SGRQ total scores at week 26; indacaterol 300 μg was the only treatment to improve the TDI total score by more than the minimum clinically important difference (≥1 point) vs placebo; and open-label tiotropium improved trough FEV1, TDI total score at week 26 and decreased the risk of COPD exacerbations vs placebo. In both subgroups, all treatments were well tolerated. ConclusionsIn patients with less dyspnoea, all treatments had similar effects. Indacaterol 300 μg may be a useful treatment option for patients with COPD who experience more severe breathlessness.

Multidetector-row computed tomography assessment of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BackgroundIn patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) showed that tiotropium dilated the inner diameters in airways from the third to the sixth generation of the bronchi. Here we aimed to evaluate the morphological effect by adding a budesonide/formoterol combination to tiotropium in COPD patients using three-dimensional MDCT. MethodsPulmonary function tests, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and MDCT imaging studies were performed at the beginning and after budesonide/formoterol combination treatment for 12 weeks in 14 patients with COPD. ResultsThe median age was 73.5 years and the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as a percentage of the predicted value was 57.2 ± 18.3%. The luminal area in the fifth generation bronchi and the emphysema volume/CT-derived total lung volume were significantly correlated with FEV1 at baseline (r = 0.682, p < 0.02 and r = −0.868, p < 0.001, respectively). The average luminal area and wall area percentage in the third, fourth and fifth generations were correlated with the SGRQ total score. Budesonide/formoterol induced insignificant pulmonary function changes and significant symptoms improvement. CT images showed an increased inner luminal area and decreased wall area after budesonide/formoterol treatment. Average luminal area was significantly increased from 24.3 ± 9.7 to 26.0 ± 9.9 mm2 in the third generation, 13.0 ± 6.5 to 14.7 ± 7.3 mm2 in the fourth generation, 8.0 ± 4.8 to 9.4 ± 4.9 mm2 in the fifth generation and 5.6 ± 2.7 to 6.7 ± 3.6 mm2 in the sixth generation (p < 0.01). The average increase of the third generation luminal area was correlated with the FEV1 increase (r = 0.632, p < 0.03). The wall area percentage significantly decreased from 51.5 ± 9.2 to 49.1 ± 9.7 in the third generation, 56.1 ± 9.7 to 53.0 ± 11.1 in the fourth generation, and 62.3 ± 9.9 to 57.6 ± 9.8 in the fifth generation (p < 0.05). Emphysema volume/CT-derived total lung volume was unchanged with treatment. ConclusionMDCT demonstrated budesonide/formoterol induced bronchodilation in the non-small airway. CT imaging can evaluate drug therapeutic effect and may provide additional insights into pharmacotherapy for COPD.

Use of tiotropium in patients with COPD aged 80 years and older

The purpose of this study was to examine clinical features and treatment modality approaches in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly in those aged 80 years and older. Using databases available at Mito Kyodo General Hospital (Japan), the medical records of COPD patients between April 2009 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The patient population was divided into three age groups; less than 70 years (the <70 age group), between 70–79 years (the 70–79 age group) and 80 years or older (the ≥80 age group). Demographic data, as well as the efficacy and safety of tiotropium, were compared between the three groups. Patients in the ≥80 age group comprised 35.6% of the study population with COPD (n=174). The ≥80 and 70–79 age groups demonstrated a higher proportion of comorbid disease compared with the <70 age group. A subjective improvement of dyspnea on effort as well as no additional adverse effects were observed in the ≥80 age group, similar to the other two age groups. However, higher incidence of acute exacerbation of COPD in patients aged ≥80 years old was found, particularly in those with comorbid disease. The efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in the ≥80 age group were almost identical to patients <80 years old, however, physicians must be cautious with acute exacerbation of COPD in the extremely elderly population with comorbid disease.

The Influence of Treatment with Formoterol, Formoterol with Tiotropium, Formoterol with Inhaled Glucocorticosteroid and Tiotropium on Lung Functions, Tolerance of Exercise and Simple, Morning Everyday Activities in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Bronchodilators - long-acting b2-adrenergic agonists (formoterol and salmeterol) and a long-acting antimuscarinic drug (tiotropium), are the main drugs applied in symptomatic treatment of COPD. In patients with COPD, dyspnea is frequently associated with simple everyday activities. Two questionnaires have been published recently as a means of assessing the patients' ability to perform morning activities and symptoms. Dynamic hyperinflation is the pathophysiological disorder responsible for dyspnea and decreased exercise tolerance in COPD. Formoterol is faster than salmeterol in diminishing air-trapping. It has been shown that treatment with formoterol and tiotropium in COPD patients improves FEV(1), FVC, IC, symptoms score and quality of life in comparison with tiotropium applied alone. Among LABA and inhaled glucocorticosteroids combinations, those containing formoterol have a more beneficial effect on the ability to perform simple morning activities (budesonide/formoterol was better than fluticasone/salmeterol). Beclomethasone/formoterol - 400/24 mcg/die, in comparison with fluticasone/salmeterol - 500/100 mcg/die significantly reduced air-trapping and dyspnea in COPD patients. The comparison of budesonide/formoterol - 400/12 mcg 2 x die with beclomethasone/ /formoterol - 200/12 mcg 2 x die has shown similar influence of both combinations on FEV(1), dyspnea, 6-minute walk test, symptoms score and quality of life. The addition of budesonide and formoterol combination to tiotropium gives further benefits: reduces number of exacerbations, improves FEV1, symptoms score and performance of simple morning routines. Doctors should pay more attention to symptoms and limitations in simple activities in the morning and adequately adjust the treatment.

Cost Effectiveness of Budesonide/Formoterol Added to Tiotropium Bromide versus Placebo Added to Tiotropium Bromide in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive inflammatory lung disease associated with increasing morbidity and mortality and an economic burden that stretches beyond the patient to healthcare systems. Avoiding exacerbations and subsequent hospitalizations is an important clinical aim and can avoid significant costs associated with the disease. International guidelines recommend the addition of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to a long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) for patients with severe to very severe COPD and a history of exacerbations. To evaluate retrospectively over a 3-month period, the cost effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium bromide (tiotropium) compared with placebo added to tiotropium in COPD patients eligible for ICS/LABA combination therapy, based on the CLIMB study (NCT00496470). A cost-effectiveness analysis of data from the 12-week, randomized, double-blind CLIMB study of COPD patients (n = 659; eligible for ICS/LABA; aged ≥ 40 years) comparing budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort® Turbuhaler® 320/9 μg twice daily) added to tiotropium (18 μg daily) or placebo added to tiotropium was conducted. A severe exacerbation was defined as a requirement for systemic glucocorticosteroids and/or ED visit and/or hospitalization. The effectiveness variable used for this analysis was the number of severe exacerbations avoided. Direct costs (medications, hospitalizations, ED and GP visits) were calculated by applying year 2009 unit costs from Australia ($A), Canada ($Can) and Sweden (Swedish krona [SEK]) to the study's pooled resource use. One-way sensitivity analyses for each country's mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and sensitivity to overall exacerbations were conducted. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the variation around resource use, exacerbations and each country's mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The mean number of severe exacerbations per patient 3-month period was 0.11 in the budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium arm and 0.29 in the placebo added to tiotropium arm--a 62% reduction in the rate of severe exacerbations. Treatment with budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium costs less in Australia and Canada (-$A90 [-€58] and -$Can4.51 [-€3]) and only slightly more in Sweden (SEK444 [€43]), i.e. the savings associated with fewer exacerbations more than offset the additional budesonide/formoterol drug cost in Australia and Canada, and partially offset it in Sweden. In the Australian and Canadian perspectives, budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium was a dominant treatment (fewer exacerbations at a lower cost) compared with placebo added to tiotropium. In Sweden, the estimated incremental cost per avoided exacerbation was SEK2502 (€244.40). Budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium was the dominant strategy compared with placebo added to tiotropium based on a 12-week study in COPD patients eligible for ICS/LABA combination therapy in Australia and Canada, and appears to be a cost-effective strategy in Sweden.

Issues on Safety of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist

The prevention of and the controlling of symptoms, reductions in the frequency of exacerbations, and disease severity are central to the pharmacologic therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients are inclined to be older, have more comorbidities, and use polypharmacy as a result. Long-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) is a preferred treatment modality. However, the cardiovascular (CV) safety of anti-cholinergics, including LAMA, has been an issue. In contrast, the results of the UPLIFT trial and a pooled analysis of data from 30 trials of tiotropium illustrates the association of tiotropium with reductions in the risk of all cause mortality, CV mortality and CV events. And, the UPLIFT trial provides clues regarding the additive advantages of tiotropium in COPD patients who already are using long-acting inhaled β2 agonists and inhaled corticosteroids. Following the contribution of tiotropium as a first LAMA, new LAMAs such as aclidinium and glycopyrrolate (NVA-237) seem to be emerging.

Improvements with tiotropium in COPD patients with concomitant asthma

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma have different diagnostic criteria and treatment paradigms. Both are common and can occur in the same patient. We sought to determine the spirometric effects of tiotropium in COPD patients with concomitant asthma. A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial with tiotropium 18 mcg daily was performed. Patients continued usual respiratory medications except for inhaled anticholinergics. Physician diagnosis of COPD and asthma, age >or= 40 years, smoking >10 pack years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1))<80% predicted, FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<70%, >or= 12%, and >or= 200 ml increase in FEV(1) following inhaled bronchodilator, treatment with inhaled steroids >or= 1 year. Spirometry was measured serially for 6h on days 1, 29 and 85. Four hundred and seventy-two patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were balanced. Mean age=59.6 years, 61.4% were men, and FEV(1)=1.55l (53.0% predicted). Improvements at 12 weeks with tiotropium were observed for the primary endpoint FEV(1) area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 6h (difference=186+/-24 ml, p<0.001) and for morning pre-dose FEV(1) (difference=98+/-23 ml, p<0.001). Significant differences in favor of tiotropium were observed for pre-dose FVC (difference=128+/-34 ml, p<0.001) and FVC AUC 0-6h (difference=232+/-35 ml, p<0.001). Compared to baseline, the mean weekly number of daily puffs of prn salbutamol was reduced by 0.05+/-0.12 puffs/day in the placebo group and by 0.50+/-0.12 puffs/day in the tiotropium group at week 12 (p<0.05). Patients with COPD and concomitant asthma achieve spirometric improvements with tiotropium along with symptomatic benefit as seen by reduced need for rescue medication.

Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care--the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study.

BackgroundClinical trials of tiotropium have principally recruited patients from secondary care with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and typically had included limitation of concomitant medication. In primary care, which is the most common setting for COPD management, many patients may have milder disease, and also may take a broad range of concomitant medication.MethodsThis randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, 44-centre study investigated the efficacy (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] response) and safety of additional treatment with once-daily tiotropium 18 μg via the HandiHaler® in a primary care COPD population (tiotropium: N = 191, FEV1 = 1.25 L [47.91% predicted]; placebo: N = 183, FEV1 = 1.32 L [49.86% predicted]). Secondary endpoints included: trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response, weekly use of rescue short-acting β-agonist, and exacerbation of COPD (complex of respiratory symptoms/events of >3 days in duration requiring a change in treatment). Treatment effects were determined using non-parametric analysis.ResultsAt Week 12, median improvement in trough FEV1 response with tiotropium versus placebo was 0.06 L (p = 0.0102). The improvement was consistent across baseline treatment and COPD severity. Median improvement in FVC at 2, 6 and 12 weeks was 0.12 L (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with ≥1 exacerbation was reduced (tiotropium 9.5%; placebo 17.9%; p = 0.0147), independent of disease severity. Rescue medication usage was significantly reduced in the tiotropium group compared with placebo. Adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies.ConclusionTiotropium provides additional benefits to usual primary care management in a representative COPD population.Trial registrationThe identifier is: NCT00274079.

Improvement of pulmonary function and dyspnea by tiotropium in COPD patients using a transdermal β2-agonist

Background A combination of bronchodilators may be effective in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined the effect of adding a long-acting anti-cholinergic agent (tiotropium) to a transdermal-type β 2-agonist (tulobuterol) on dyspnea as well as pulmonary function. Methods In a multicentre, randomized, parallel design study, 60 COPD patients treated with the transdermal β 2-agonist tulobuterol were divided into a tiotropium added group (Tulo+Tio group, n = 40 ) or transdermal β 2-agonist tulobuterol alone group (Tulo group, n = 20 ), and then treated for 4 weeks after a 2 week run-in period. Pulmonary function and a dyspnea (Medical Research Council (MRC)) scale were assessed before and after the treatment. Daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring was also performed. Results After 4 weeks, the Tulo+Tio group showed a significant increase in pulmonary function compared with the Tulo group; ΔFVC (0.31±0.06 L vs. 0.06±0.05 L, p< 0.01), ΔFEV 1 (0.15±0.03 L vs. −0.02±0.02 L, p<0.0001), and ΔPEF (41.0±5.1 L/min vs. 0.5±3.5 L/min, p<0.0001). The MRC dyspnea scale was also significantly improved in Tulo+Tio, but not in Tulo group. Conclusion These results suggest that tiotropium caused a significant improvement in both pulmonary function and dyspnea in COPD patients already treated with the transdermal β 2-agonist tulobuterol.

Tiotropium in COPD patients not previously receiving maintenance respiratory medications

Use of maintenance bronchodilator therapy is currently recommended in symptomatic patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in those with Stage II or greater COPD as defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Because no prospective data describe when rescue therapy alone is insufficient or the optimal time to start maintenance therapy, it is unclear whether maintenance therapy has benefits in milder disease. To explore potential benefits we asked: Does once-daily tiotropium improve lung function, health status, and/or symptoms in "undertreated" COPD patients (i.e., those who are not receiving maintenance bronchodilator therapy) or patients considered by their health care providers as having milder disease? A post-hoc analysis of data from COPD patients participating in two, 1-year, placebo-controlled trials with tiotropium was performed. Patients were defined as "undertreated" if they received no respiratory medication or only as-needed short-acting beta-agonists prior to enrollment. Measures included serial spirometry, Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Of 921 patients enrolled, 218 (23.7%) were "undertreated": 130 received tiotropium; 88 received placebo. Demographics for the two treatment groups were comparable. Tiotropium-treated patients had significantly improved forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) compared with patients using placebo on all study days. Additionally, TDI and SGRQ scores significantly improved with tiotropium compared with placebo. Once-daily tiotropium provides significant improvement in lung function, health status, and dyspnea when used as maintenance therapy in undertreated COPD patients who were not previously receiving maintenance bronchodilator therapy.