You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Physiology, Pathophysiology, Basic Research1 Apr 20112022 LIGHT-INDUCED DIELECTROPHORESIS ASSAY FOR USE IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: IS IT SAFE? A MOUSE EMBRYO EXPOSURE AND TRANSFER MODEL Maurice Garcia, Justin Valley, Sid Espineda, and Ming Wu Maurice GarciaMaurice Garcia San Francisco, CA More articles by this author , Justin ValleyJustin Valley Berkeley, CA More articles by this author , Sid EspinedaSid Espineda San Francisco, CA More articles by this author , and Ming WuMing Wu Berkeley, CA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2250AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We have shown that a novel, light-based assay we developed, termed Optoelectronic Tweezers (OET), can non-invasively identify and sort viable from non-viable sperm within an unwashed sample. Using COMET assay of human sperm exposed to OET assay, we have also shown that OET assay of human sperm does not result in increased DNA fragmentation. Whether OET assay is compatible with fertility following exposure has remained unknown. METHODS A mouse preimplantation embryo model was used. A total of 565 B6D2F1 mouse embryos were harvested at the 1-cell (zygote) stage and cultured in M16 medium. On day #3.5. 192 morphologically indistinguishable early-blastocysts were culled from the group and randomly divided into two groups (A,B) (N=96ea.). Embryos from group A were exposed to OET assay, and underwent uterine oviduct transfer to 6 pseudo-pregnant recipient females (16E/each). Embryos from Group B were not exposed to OET before uterine transfer (16E/each). Recipients were housed in single cages. Litter size, # days since transfer, and neuromotor developmental milestones through day 10 (including pup body-weight (g.) on day of life #2), were recorded. RESULTS All recipient females (100%) yielded live, normal-appearing healthy pup litters 18–19 days after transfer. The total proportion of live pups per number of embryos transferred was 36/96 (38%) for Group A, and 42/96 (44%) for Group B (difference in birth rate Group B–Group A [95% C.I.]: 6% [−9%, 22%]; p>0.05). The range in pup litter-size was 4–12 for both groups. Mean body-weight on DOL #2 equaled (range; SD) 2.47 g. (1.7–2.8; 0.47) in Group A, and 2.55 g. (1.8–2.7; 0.42) for Group B. The difference in mean weight was 0.08 g. [−0.06 g to 0.22 g], and no difference in attainment and timing of developmental milestones was noted (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS OET exposure of mouse embryos does not appear to compromise likelihood of live, healthy birth. Given the presumed increased vulnerability (relative to sperm) of the developing embryo to environmental stress, these results, combined with previous work, are reassuring and suggest that OET assay of sperm and embryos may be safe for use with human assisted reproductive technology. Future studies must include mouse ICSI with OET-selected sperm. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e808 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Maurice Garcia San Francisco, CA More articles by this author Justin Valley Berkeley, CA More articles by this author Sid Espineda San Francisco, CA More articles by this author Ming Wu Berkeley, CA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...