You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection and Screening1 Apr 20111204 HEIGHT AND THE RISK FOR AGGRESSIVE PROSTATE CANCER AT THE TIME OF BIOPSY–RESULTS FROM THE DUKE PROSTATE CENTER DATABASE Elizabeth E. Calloway, David I. Chu, Leah Gerber, Jean-Alfred Thomas, Cary N. Robertson, Thomas J. Polascik, Judd W. Moul, and Lionel L. Bañez Elizabeth E. CallowayElizabeth E. Calloway Durham, NC More articles by this author , David I. ChuDavid I. Chu Durham, NC More articles by this author , Leah GerberLeah Gerber Durham, NC More articles by this author , Jean-Alfred ThomasJean-Alfred Thomas Durham, NC More articles by this author , Cary N. RobertsonCary N. Robertson Durham, NC More articles by this author , Thomas J. PolascikThomas J. Polascik Durham, NC More articles by this author , Judd W. MoulJudd W. Moul Durham, NC More articles by this author , and Lionel L. BañezLionel L. Bañez Durham, NC More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.839AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Adult height is closely related to childhood exposures to androgens, growth hormone (GH) and other molecules such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), bioactive substances which have been linked with prostate cancer (CaP) growth and development. Thus, height is being considered as a potential risk factor for CaP and advanced CaP, though previous studies have been inconclusive. Herein, we examine the relationship between height and risk for overall and aggressive CaP in a contemporary cohort of men undergoing prostate biopsy in a tertiary-care hospital. METHODS Demographic, anthropometric and clinical information on 1,180 men who underwent initial prostate biopsy from 2004 to 2009 were retrospectively abstracted from the Duke Prostate Center database. Risk for overall and aggressive (biopsy Gleason sum ≥8) CaP were evaluated using crude and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models controlling for age, race, body mass index, year of biopsy, pre-biopsy PSA and digital rectal examination findings. Measured height was treated as a continuous variable in all analyses. RESULTS Mean height was 177.8 cm (±7.6) overall. A total of 520 men (44%) received a diagnosis of CaP. Among these men, 69 (13%) had Gleason sum ≥8 CaP. Height was not associated with risk for overall CaP in both crude (p=0.55) and adjusted (p=0.17) regression models. On univariate analysis, there was a trend for elevated risk for Gleason sum ≥8 CaP with increasing height which did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.025; p=0.114). However, after adjusting for potential demographic and clinical confounders, height was found to be significantly associated with increased risk for aggressive CaP on a continuum (OR 1.033; 95% CI 1.001–1.065; p=0.039). Specifically, for each additional centimeter difference in height, the log-odds for aggressive CaP increases by 3.3%. CONCLUSIONS In the current study, height was a significant risk factor for aggressive CaP at the time of prostate biopsy. Our findings support the investigation of pharmacologic agents directed at biological pathways, such as the GH-IGF axis, that are related to both increased adult height and development of high-grade tumors. Indeed, novel drugs targeting the GH-IGF axis, such as IGF-1 receptor inhibitors, are currently under investigation to treat non-small cell lung cancer but have not been studied in-depth to treat CaP. In addition, whether height can be used to risk stratify and identify patients who are more likely to respond to GH-IGF axis-directed therapies warrants further investigation. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e483 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Elizabeth E. Calloway Durham, NC More articles by this author David I. Chu Durham, NC More articles by this author Leah Gerber Durham, NC More articles by this author Jean-Alfred Thomas Durham, NC More articles by this author Cary N. Robertson Durham, NC More articles by this author Thomas J. Polascik Durham, NC More articles by this author Judd W. Moul Durham, NC More articles by this author Lionel L. Bañez Durham, NC More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract