Catheter Indwelling Time Research Articles

A multidisciplinary comprehensive nursing Management Approach for Catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) stands as one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections, often resulting in high healthcare expenditure and mortality rates. Despite efforts, reducing the incidence of CR-BSI remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary organizational intervention on reducing intravenous CR-BSI. A quality improvement team was established to implement various interventions, utilizing the FOCUS-PDCA continuous quality improvement model and fishbone diagram for analysis and improvement. After the interventions, operational indicators for catheter insertion, maintenance, and removal improved from 82.50% ± 1.15%, 83.60% ± 1.60%, and 81.60% ± 1.80-95.30% ± 1.00%, 96.20% ± 1.62%, and 97.25% ± 0.50%, respectively. Additionally, catheter dwell time decreased from 7.50 ± 0.85 days to 3.50 ± 0.75 days, and the quarterly infection rate was reduced from 2.328% ± 1.85-0.305% ± 0.95% following the implementation of the intervention. Despite the available evidence, there remains a noticeable gap between the ideal evidence-based practices and their practical implementation. We aim to eradicate CR-BSIs within the surgical intensive care units (ICUs) of hospitals. To achieve this goal, we have introduced a comprehensive quality improvement framework designed not only to benefit our own ICU but also to serve as a model for implementation in other similar healthcare settings.

ETIOLOGICAL AND RESISTANCE PROFILE OF BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM PRIMARY BLOOD STREAM INFECTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER IN NEONATES

Introduction: The Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is a peripherally inserted intravenous device with central venous access characteristics, with bloodstream infection being the main complication associated with the presence of this catheter. The main pathogens involved are: Candida sp., gram-positive cocci of the genus Staphylococcus coagulase-negative and gram-negative bacilli. Objective: To identify the main risk factors for neonates reported with laboratory-confirmed Primary Bloodstream Infection (PBSI) associated with PICC, as well as the etiological profile and resistance of the most prevalent bacteria. Methodology: Descriptive study with a quantitative approach carried out from January/2015 to December/2016 in the ICU of a maternal and child hospital. The sample consisted of reported cases with PICC-associated BSI. Data collection was performed using notification forms, blood culture results and antibiograms attached to the medical records. Data were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The main risk factors associated with bloodstream infection were: prematurity, prolonged hospitalization, catheter indwelling time, use of antibiotics and parenteral nutrition. Regarding the microbiological profile, S. epidermidis predominated, with 71% of strains resistant to oxacillin. Conclusion: Care planning by the interdisciplinary team for adequate management of the PICC, as well as monitoring, evaluation and discussion of the rates of PICC-associated infections will enable the adaptation of practices that minimize the rates of hospital infections.

Prolonged intracranial catheter dwell time exacerbates penumbral stress and worsens stroke thrombectomy outcomes

BackgroundThe duration of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a negative predictor of outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), yet the precise mechanisms are unclear. We investigated whether the placement of large-bore...

Incidence of peripheral intravenous cannula induced phlebitis and its determinants among admitted patients in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta analysis, 2024

BackgroundPeripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are frequently used in clinical practice. Nonetheless, individuals who receive intravenous injections frequently have varying degrees of phlebitis. According to pertinent research, the catheter gauge, insertion site, and length of catheterization are strongly correlated with the incidence of phlebitis. However, no meta-analysis on the combined incidence of phlebitis and its contributing factors has been conducted. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to close the previously identified gaps.MethodA literature survey was conducted using electronic databases (CINAHL, Embassy, Google Scholar, and PubMed), and 4 studies were included they used peripheral intravenous catheters for therapeutic or volumetric infusion and reported phlebitis incidence rates. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain the overall and subgroup phlebitis incidence rates and odds ratio for phlebitis incidence.ResultsThe incidence of phlebitis was 41 per 100 catheters (95% CI 0.22–0.60). There were 1584 patients in the included studies to know the incidence of phlebitis. In the subgroup analysis, the incidence of phlebitis in neonatal and infant patients was 30% (95% CI 0.25–0.34), in pediatrics patients was 34% (95% CI 0.29–0.38), and in adult patients was 50% (95% CI 0.11–0.89) respectively. Joint involvement in the PIVC (AOR: 2.44, 95% CI 1.67, 3.2), longer catheter dwell time (AOR = 3.96, 95% CI 1.59–7.33), and drug and blood administration in one vein (AOR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.67–2.15) were the most common factors associated with the incidence of phlebitis in Ethiopia.ConclusionThis meta-analysis indicates that PIVC-induced phlebitis is highly prevalent in Ethiopia. This meta-analysis identified significant risk factors for the development of phlebitis including medications and blood administered in a single vein, longer cannula dwelling times, and joint involvement in peripheral intravenous cannula insertion. Using the right interventions can lower the chance of developing phlebitis.

Long-term maintenance-related complications of brachiocephalic vein cannulations in neonates: A retrospective evaluation.

Neonates are relatively prone to immediate, early, and late complications related to central venous cannulation (CVC). Ultrasound-guided brachiocephalic vein (BCV) cannulation has proven to be safe in neonates. Although studies addressed the immediate and early complications of CVC via BCV in neonates, few explored long-term maintenance-related complications. To evaluate the incidences of long-term maintenance-related complications including central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), central line-associated thrombosis (CLAT), and mechanical complications (CLAMC) of nontunneled BCV cannulation in neonates and their relationship with patient and catheter-related factors. This study included BCV cannulations of neonates with postconceptional age of ≤44 weeks performed between January 2018 and January 2023. The incidences of complications were determined. Correlations between complications and postconceptional age, body weight, indication for catheter placement, the size and side of the catheter, as well as catheter dwell time were analyzed. In total, 89 BCV cannulations performed in 71 neonates. The incidences were 19.3 [95%CI: 12.88-28.76] total complications, 5.9 [95%CI: 2.84-12.06] CLABSI, 3.4 [95%CI: 1.30-8.58] CLAT and 10.1 [95%CI: 5.76-17.49] CLAMC in 1000 catheter days. There were 23 (25.8%) total complications; 7 (7.9%) were CLABSI, 4 (4.5%) were CLAT, and 12 (13.5%) were CLAMC. The multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged dwell time was associated with high incidence of total complications [OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00-1.14, p = .047] and the catheter of smaller size (3F in this study) was associated with higher incidence of CLABSI [OR: 8.91, 95% CI: 1.03-77.45, p = .047]. In this study, the prolonged dwell time and smaller sized catheter was found to be independent predictors of total complications and CLABSI, respectively. The independent predictive effects of postconceptional age and body weight should be addressed in larger studies as potential risk factors.

Importance of risk adjusting central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in children.

Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is one of the most prevalent pediatric healthcare-associated infections and is used to benchmark hospital performance. Pediatric patients have increased in acuity and complexity over time. Existing approaches to risk adjustment do not control for individual patient characteristics, which are strong predictors of CLABSI risk and vary over time. Our objective was to develop a risk adjustment model for CLABSI in hospitalized children and compare observed to expected rates over time. We conducted a prospective cohort study using electronic health record data at a quaternary Children's Hospital. We included hospitalized children with central catheters. Risk factors identified from published literature were considered for inclusion in multivariable modeling based on association with CLABSI risk in bivariable analysis and expert input. We calculated observed and expected (risk model-adjusted) annual CLABSI rates. Among 16,411 patients with 520,209 line days, 633 patients experienced 796 CLABSIs. The final model included age, behavioral health condition, non-English speaking, oncology service, port catheter type, catheter dwell time, lymphatic condition, total parenteral nutrition, and number of organ systems requiring ICU level care. For every organ system receiving ICU level care the odds ratio for CLABSI was 1.24 (95% CI 1.12-1.37). Although not statistically different, observed rates were lower than expected rates for later years. Failure to adjust for patient factors, particularly acuity and complexity of disease, may miss clinically significant differences in CLABSI rates, and may lead to inaccurate interpretation of the impact of quality improvement efforts.

Cost effectiveness of a vascular access education and training program for hospitalized emergency department patients.

Education and training in vascular access is a critical component to delivering quality vascular access care. Given that organizations must invest resources to implement and sustain high-quality vascular access programming, we aimed to demonstrate the cost effectiveness of a program (Operation STICK (OSTICK)) in the emergency department (ED). This was an observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic center with 120,000 ED visits. Consecutive hospitalized adults with ultrasound-guided (DIVA) and traditionally-placed (non-DIVA) peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) in the ED were included in the analysis. Two groups (OSTICK and non-OSTICK) were compared in the analysis: OSTICK PIVCs were inserted by clinicians with formal, standardized training in peripheral venous access while non-OSTICK PIVCs were inserted by staff with basic departmental training in PIVC care. Cost factors included number of procedures, wait time to establish a PIVC, complications, and training. Effect was complication-free PIVC functionality. Multiple linear regressions were used to estimate incremental cost (ΔC), incremental effect (ΔE), and incremental net benefit (INB) of the OSTICK program. From 10/1/2022 thru 3/31/2023, 21,259 PIVCs including 1681 OSTICK and 19,578 non-OSTICK PIVCs were included in the analysis. Average age was 64.8 and 53.7% were female. The estimate of incremental cost (ΔC) for each patient was -$83.175 (95% CI: -$103.953 to -$62.398; p<0.001), indicating that the OSTICK group saves money compared to the non-OSTICK group. The OSTICK group is also more effective at increasing the proportion of catheter dwell time relative to hospital length of stay (ΔE), with an estimate of 0.037 (95% CI: 0.016 to 0.059; p<0.001), compared to those in the non-OSTICK group. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the OSTICK group compared with the non-OSTICK group was -$221.964 (95% CI: -$177.400 to -$381.716) per ten percentage points of PIVC dwell time to hospital length of stay increase. Strategic investment in vascular access education and training can yield impressive financial returns while simultaneously enhancing vascular access outcomes. It is imperative for organizations to recognize the significant impact of such initiatives and prioritize the implementation of comprehensive programs.

Impact of a care bundle on short peripheral catheter-associated complications in a resource-limited neonatal unit.

Short peripheral catheter (SPC)-associated complications occur frequently in hospitalised neonates. Few studies have reported the use of SPC care bundles in resource-limited neonatal units. To evaluate the impact of a SPC care bundle on SPC associated complications (infiltration, dislodgement, phlebitis) and catheter dwell time. We conducted a quasi-experimental study comparing neonatal SPC complications during a 2-month baseline and a 2-month intervention period, where a SPC care bundle was introduced including hand hygiene, insertion site antisepsis, nurse assistance during cannulation, IV insertion carts and IV securement dressings. A total of 459 SPC days were observed in 223 neonates: 111 pre-intervention and 112 post-intervention (after SPC bundle implementation). Most neonates were preterm (208, 93.3%) with very or extremely low birth weight (133, 59.6%). SPC care bundle compliance was 43.8% for five bundle elements and 83.9% for four bundle elements. Most SPCs had unplanned removal within 48 h of insertion owing to infiltration or dislodgement (89/111 pre-intervention (80.2%) vs 90/112 post-intervention (80.4%); 0.974). No phlebitis was documented. The mean SPC dwell time was unchanged following bundle implementation (32.9 vs 34.2 h; p = 0.376). Infiltration and dislodgement occurred frequently necessitating replacement of four of every five SPCs. Despite moderate compliance with the SPC care bundle, the high rates of unplanned SPC removal and short duration of catheter dwell time were unchanged. The SPC care bundle did not improve catheter dwell time; further research is needed to identify strategies to reduce unplanned SPC removal and extend catheter dwell time in hospitalised neonates.

Comparison of complications and indwelling time in midline catheters versus central venous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Central venous catheters and midline catheters are commonly used as medium- to long-term intravenous infusion tools in clinical nursing. However, there is currently no reliable conclusion on whether there are differences in complications and indwelling time between these two types of catheters. To investigate whether there are differences in the incidence of complications and indwelling time between the use of midline catheters and central venous catheters as intravenous infusion tools. A systematic search was conducted across various databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The selection of studies and assessment of their quality was carried out independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.3 software. Heterogeneity was evaluated, one of the pooled analyses was performed using the random-effect model, while the others used the fixed-effect model. Mean differences or odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Ten studies (1,554 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the complication rates [OR = 0.36, 95% CI (0.18, 0.70), p = 0.003], incidence of catheter-related thrombosis [OR = 0.28, 95% CI (0.11, 0.71), I2= 0%,p = 0.007], catheter-related infection[OR = 0.36, 95% CI (0.16, 0.78), I2= 27%, p = 0.007] and catheter blockage [OR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.09, 0.51), I2= 18%, p = 0.0005] between midline catheters group and central venous catheters group. There was a statistically significant difference in the catheter indwelling time between the two groups [MD = 0.9, 95% CI (0.33, 1.46), I2= 0%, p = 0.002]. There was no significant difference in other complications such as phlebitis, catheter dislodgement and leakage between the two groups. Midline catheter was superior to central venous catheter in terms of the overall complication rates and incidence of catheter-related thrombosis, catheter blockage, catheter-related infection and indwelling time.

Catheters linked thrombosis in neonates: a single center observational study

BackgroundCentral venous catheters (CVCs) are the major risk factors for neonatal thrombosis that might negatively affect morbidity and mortality in neonates. The aim of the present work was to estimate the incidence of CVC-linked thrombosis, among neonates in the NICU of Alexandria University Maternity Hospital, Egypt, over 1year, and to determine its possible risk factors.MethodsThis observational cohort study involved 134 newborn infants born from July 2020 to July 2021with CVCs insertion during their hospital stay. Patients who had congenital anomalies, had thrombosis unrelated to the implantation of CVCs or died before 7 days of catheter placement were excluded from the analysis. The 134 neonates who met the study’s eligibility requirements had 142 CVCs inserted. Serial ultrasound and Doppler scans on site of venous insertion of catheters were performed.ResultsSeventeen patients with catheter’s thrombosis (12%) were found during the placement of 142 catheters or 1615 CVCs’ days, resulting in an overall rate of 10.5 thrombotic events per 1000 catheters’ days. We constructed a logistic regression model to identify risk factors behind CVC-linked thrombosis. In univariate analysis, femoral central venous lines (CVLs), catheter dwell-time, sepsis, packed red cells (PRBCs) transfusions and low platelet count were risk factors for CVC-linked thrombosis. Nevertheless, only PRBCs transfusion was significant in the multivariate analysis, with OR and 95% confidence level 5.768 (1.013–32.836).ConclusionMany factors should be considered in prediction of patients at risk of thrombosis including sepsis, femoral line insertion, low platelet count and PRBCs-transfusions. In our analysis, PRBCs-transfusion through peripheral intravenous lines (PIVs) was the strongest factor associated with CVC-linked thrombosis.

Operation STICK Improves Vascular Access Outcomes in a Specialty Team: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Education and training may improve outcomes within an experienced vascular access team. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a standardized peripheral intravenous catheter insertion educational program (Operation STICK) on vascular access outcomes. A quasi-experimental study design was used. Adult inpatients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) requiring ultrasound-guided insertion by a vascular access specialty team were eligible. Data were collected before and 7months after the educational training program. A total of 54 subjects were included (24 pre- and 30 post-implementation). Significant improvements were found for mean peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time (3.62 to 14.97days, P <.001), completion of therapy (58.3% to 96.7%, P =.001), and first-stick success rate (79.2% to 100%, P =.013). Catheter-to-vein ratio significantly decreased (P =.007). Standardized education/training in vascular access focusing on best practices yields favorable outcomes for DIVA patients within an established specialty team.

Comparative efficacy of bilateral mesh sacrospinous ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with metroptosis

This study assesses the efficacy of bilateral mesh sacrospinous ligament suspension (MSSLS) compared to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with uterine prolapse. Ninety-eight patients with uterine prolapse were evaluated at our hospital from January 2021 to January 2023. Patients were equally divided into two groups: the study group (undergoing MSSLS) and the control group (undergoing LSC) using a random number table. Various parameters including operation time, bleeding volume, indwelling catheter time, exhaust time, hospital stay, pelvic organ prolapse stage, postoperative recurrence rate, pain severity, quality of life, pelvic floor function, impact on sexual life, complications, and recurrence rate were recorded. The study group showed significant reductions in operation time, bleeding volume, indwelling catheter time, exhaust time, and hospital stay compared to the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp, and C between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05), but six months postoperatively, these indexes were significantly lower in the study group (P < 0.05). Pain severity did not differ significantly between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05), but was significantly lower in the study group six months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Quality of life, pelvic floor function, and sexual life quality did not significantly differ before surgery, at 6 months, and at 12 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). All patients were followed up for 12–14 months, with an average follow-up time of (13.02 ± 1.36) months. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the study group (P < 0.05), but there were no recurrences in either group, thus the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). MSSLS emerges as a safe and efficacious treatment for uterine prolapse, notably reducing both complications and recurrence rates, rendering it suitable for broad clinical application.

Peripheral intravenous catheter-induced phlebitis in a tertiary hospital of Karachi: a cohort study.

This study aimed to determine the incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC)-induced phlebitis and its predictors among adult patients hospitalized at Dow University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. A sample of 258 adult patients admitted in the selected wards and planned for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion were recruited through consecutive sampling during March to May 2019. Daily follow-ups were performed to observe signs of phlebitis using a validated tool. The cohort was followed until discharge, removal of peripheral intravenous catheter, or study conclusion. Of 258 patients studied, 139 (53.9%) were females. A significant number of the participants 104 (40.3%) were young adults of age 20-40 years. The incidence of phlebitis was 39.1%. Tuberculosis (TB), peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time before initial assessment, administration of IV fluids, and dissatisfactory nursing care at Day 1 were associated significantly with the development of phlebitis. There was a doseresponse relationship between the catheter dwell time in hours before initial assessment and the development of phlebitis. This study found an increased incidence (39.1%) in three months of PIVC-induced phlebitis among adult patients. In addition to patient-related and PIVC-related risk factors considered in this study, PIVC-induced phlebitis is found to be significantly associated with the level of PIVC care provided by nurses. Continuous nursing education, developing standard care plans for PIVCs, and proper documentation of care are recommended.

Differences in the Dwell Time of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters between Patients with Catheter Colonization and Those Developing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.

Substantial knowledge gaps exist concerning the varying durations of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placements that lead to either central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) or catheter colonization. We aimed to compare PICCs dwell time between patients who developed CLABSIs due to multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) and patients with catheter colonization by MDROs. Data from 86 patients admitted consecutively to a tertiary-care hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dwell time was 25.73 ± 16.19 days in the PICC-CLABSI group and 16.36 ± 10.28 days in the PICC-colonization group (p = 0.002). The mean dwell time was 17.38 ± 9.5 days in the PICC-MDRO group and 22.48 ± 15.64 days in the PICC-non-MDRO group (p = 0.005). Within the PICC-CLABSI group, the mean dwell time for CLABSIs caused by MDROs was 21.50 ± 12.31 days, compared to 27.73 ± 16.98 days for CLABSIs caused by non-MDROs (p = 0.417). Within the PICC-colonization group, the mean dwell time was 15.55 ± 7.73 days in PICCs colonized by MDROs and 16.92 ± 11.85 days in PICCs colonized by non-MDROs (p = 0.124). The findings of the present study suggest that CLABSIs caused by MDROs in PICCs are associated with a shorter mean catheter dwell time compared to those caused by non-MDROs, underscoring the importance of considering infections by MDROs when evaluating PICC dwell times.

Clinical application study of midline catheter in vasopressor therapy

To evaluate the safety and necessity of vasopressor infusion through midline catheter. A convenient sampling method was used for a controlled study. A total of 88 adult patients who used vasopressors admitted to respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Fenyang Hospital in Shanxi Province from June 2022 to June 2023 were enrolled as the research subjects. A total of 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) from June to December 2022 were enrolled as the PICC group, and 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through midline catheter from January to June 2023 were enrolled as the midline catheter group. Both groups of patients used the modified Sedinger technique under the guidance of B-ultrasound for puncture and catheter placement. The middle 1/3 site between the cubital fossa and the axilla was selected. The catheters were 5 Fr double lumen. After catheter placement, the patients were followed until catheter removal, death, or 30 days (whichever came first). Based on the Infusion therapy standards of practice revised by American Infusion Nurses Society (INS), and combined with the results of previous preliminary tests, the safety evaluation was conducted on incomplete catheter obstruction, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), phlebitis, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection), and exudation of the puncture site in the two groups of patients. There were no statistical differences in gender, age, catheter indwelling time, and primary disease between the two groups, indicating that the baseline data of the two groups were balanced and comparable. No CRBSI or phlebitis occurred in both groups during the observation period after catheterization. One patient in both groups had exudation at the puncture site [both were 2.27% (1/44)]. Compared with the PICC group, the incidence of incomplete catheter obstruction, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection) in the midline catheter group were lowered [incomplete catheter obstruction: 4.55% (2/44) vs. 6.82% (3/44), thrombus within the catheter during extubation: 0% (0/44) vs. 2.27% (1/44), redness of the puncture site (but no infection): 0% (0/44) vs. 4.55% (2/44)], the overall incidence was significantly decreased [6.82% (3/44) vs. 15.91% (7/44), P < 0.01]. Administering vasopressor through a midline catheter can reduce the incidence of catheter-related complications, decrease the rate of central venous catheterization, and reduce the financial burden on patients.

Establishment of urinary catheter materials antibacterial efficacy evaluation platform in pigs

Urinary catheters are one of the common invasive medical catheters, mostly composed of high-polymer materials such as polyurethanes. During clinical use, the high friction between the catheter material surface and tissues can lead to tissue damage, patient discomfort, and pain during insertion or removal. Moreover, due to the hydrophobic nature of the polymer material surface, there is a risk of urinary tract infections (CTIs) caused by problems such as protein adsorption and bacterial infection upon insertion into the body. Prolonged indwelling time of urinary catheters in the body increases the probability of other complications, potentially leading to life-threatening consequences and imposing medical burdens. Therefore, the purpose of this study was focused on the insertion of the Escherichia coli (E. coli, 1 × 105 CFU/mL)-coated urinary catheter to implant into a female pig’s urethra for establishing the urinary catheter materials antibacterial efficacy evaluation platform in pigs. Results were shown that during the experimental period, the week 1 and week 2 average pig’ body temperature were 39.4 ± 0.6°C and 39.1 ± 0.2°C, respectively. The average pig’s body temperature was normal and there was no significant differences in body temperature at week 1 and week 2 urinary catheter implanted-experiment period. Moreover, the clinical observation of the pigs showed that their vitality, appetite, and excretion were all normal, and they survived until the end of the experiment without presenting any abnormal clinical symptoms. In addition, E. coli in urine culture respectively showed 0.95 ± 0.03 × 105 CFU/mL, 1.23 ± 0.03 × 105 CFU/mL, 1.43 ± 0.04 × 105 CFU/mL, 1.75 ± 0.08 × 105 CFU/mL, and 1.91 ± 0.09 × 105 CFU/mL on day 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14 of urinary catheter implantation. As time progressed after urinary catheter implantation, there was an increasing trend in E. coli counts. Staining with crystal violet for urinary catheter showed that the urinary catheter wall was positive for crystal violet staining. E. coli isolation and counts from biofilm on inside and outside of urinary catheter respectively showed 5.10 ± 0.10 × 105 CFU/mL and 7.50 ± 1.08 × 105 CFU/mL on day 14 of urinary catheter implantation. As time progressed after urinary catheter implantation, there was an increasing trend in E. coli counts. Finally, the pathological interpretation of the urinary tract indicates that in the tissue morphology of the bladder, there is observed a localized mild shedding of superficial and intermediate layer cells in the transitional epithelium of the ureteral stent group, with only basal cells remaining connected to its submucosa. There are no significant pathological changes observed in the tissue morphology of the urethra and kidneys. According to the results of this study, a urinary catheter materials antibacterial efficacy evaluation platform in pigs has successfully established, which can be provided for R&amp;D of urinary catheter antibacterial materials.

Complication Rates of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Oncologic Versus Non-Oncologic Patients

ObjectivesPeripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in cancer patients and provide vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, or parenteral nutrition. Besides many advantages, they represent a source of possible complications such as catheter related blood stream infection, catheter occlusion, or thrombosis. In this study, the catheter-related complication rate between oncologic and non-oncologic patients was compared. MethodsThis retrospective cohort-study included 411 patients who underwent their first catheter placement at the Vienna General Hospital—Medical University of Vienna from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics and catheter-related parameters were collected and statistically analyzed using a competing risk model. ResultsMean catheter dwell time was 27.75 days. The overall complication rate was 7.54% (2.72 per 1000 catheter days). Underlying malignant disease (hazard ratio: 0.351, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.133-0.929, P = .035) and chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% CI: 1.088-7.394, P = .033) were significantly associated with the occurrence of any kind of complication. Catheter related blood stream infection was observed among 11 (2.68%) patients and again significantly associated with chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 4.545, 95% CI: 1.178-17.539; P = .028). Thrombosis was found in 7 (1.70%) patients and occlusion in 13 (3.16%) cases. Conclusions and implications for nursing practiceChoice of venous access is an interdisciplinary decision with emphasis on patient participation. In oncologic patients, our data suggests that the benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding costs, invasiveness, and accessibility might be outweighed by the higher rate of complications associated with the device. This becomes even more important in a community care setting, where standardized handling procedures and patient education play a pivotal role in device safety.

Robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer shows similar clinical efficacy to laparoscopic surgery: A propensity score matched study.

Rectal cancer ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, necessitating surgical resection as the sole treatment option. Over the years, there has been a growing adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques such as robotic and laparoscopic approaches. Robotic surgery represents an innovative modality that effectively addresses the limitations associated with traditional laparoscopic techniques. While previous studies have reported favorable perioperative outcomes for robot-assisted radical resection in rectal cancer patients, further evidence regarding its oncological safety is still warranted. To conduct a comparative analysis of perioperative and oncological outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection (LALAR) procedures. The clinical data of 125 patients who underwent robot-assisted low anterior resection (RALAR) and 279 patients who underwent LALAR resection at Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from December 2019 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. After performing a 1:1 propensity score matching, the patients were divided into two groups: The RALAR group and the LALAR group (111 cases in each group). Subsequently, a comparison was made between the short-term outcomes within 30 d after surgery and the 3-year survival outcomes of these two groups. Compared to the LALAR group, the RALAR group exhibited a significantly earlier time to first flatus [2 (2-2) d vs 3 (3-3) d, P = 0.000], as well as a shorter time to first fluid diet [4 (3-4) d vs 5 (4-6) d, P = 0.001]. Additionally, the RALAR group demonstrated reduced postoperative indwelling catheter time [2 (1-3) d vs 4 (3-5) d, P = 0.000] and decreased length of hospital stay after surgery [5 (5-7) d vs 7(6-8) d, P = 0.009]. Moreover, there was an observed increase in total cost of hospitalization for the RALAR group compared to the LALAR group [10777 (10780-11850) dollars vs 10550 (8766-11715) dollars, P = 0.012]. No significant differences were found in terms of conversion rate to laparotomy or incidence of postoperative complications between both groups. Furthermore, no significant disparities were noted regarding the 3-year overall survival rate and 3-year disease-free survival rate between both groups. Robotic surgery offers potential advantages in terms of accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal and urologic function compared to LALAR resection, while maintaining similar perioperative and 3-year oncological outcomes.

Prolonged indwelling catheter time after RARP does not lead to follow-up surgery

BackgroundIndwelling catheterization following radical prostatectomy is used to aid healing and urinary drainage. While early removal is well investigated, prolonged catheterization has only been investigated in terms of urinary incontinence. Other complications such as anastomotic strictures are unexplored so far. This study aims to analyze the sequelae of catheterization lasting more than 14 days after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).MethodsA prospective database of 3087 patients undergoing RARP was analyzed, focusing on 180 patients with catheterization exceeding 14 days (Group A) and 88 matched controls (Group B). Outcome measures included subsequent surgeries, complications, and functional outcomes.ResultsProlonged catheterization did not significantly increase the need for subsequent surgeries (6% in Group A vs. 7% in Group B, p = .95). However, anastomotic strictures were more common in Group A (3%) compared to Group B (0%) after exclusion of risk factors. Incontinence rates were similar between groups, although a subgroup analysis revealed higher incontinence rates in patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days. No significant differences were observed in erectile function or quality of life between the groups.ConclusionProlonged catheterization after RARP does not independently increase the risk of anastomotic strictures in the general population. However, in patients without risk factors, prolonged catheter dwell time may elevate the risk of strictures and subsequent surgeries. Additionally, patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days may experience higher rates of long-term incontinence. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate the long-term implications of prolonged catheterization.

Correlation Analysis between Urinary Catheter Indwelling Time and Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infection.

Indwelling urinary catheter is closely associated with the occurrence of urinary tract infection (UTI). Herein, we further explored the correlation of urinary catheter indwelling time and UTI. Retrospectively, the medical data of nosocomial patients (n = 681) were collected during two quarters of April 2023 to June 2023 (the second quarter, 23.4-23.6, n = 330) and July 2023 to September 2023 (the third quarter, 23.7-23.9, n = 351). The baseline data and incidence of catheter-related UTI were analysed. The total hospitalisation days and indwelling urinary catheter days of patients in five departments were assessed, namely, coronary care unit (CCU), respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), surgical intensive care unit (SICU), neurology intensive care unit (NICU) and cardiac surgical intensive care unit (CSICU) departments. The correlation between hospitalisation days/indwelling urinary catheter days and the occurrence of UTI was evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis. In the CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU departments, the number of patients was 463, 83, 29, 91 and 15, respectively. During 23.4-23.6, the incidence of catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) was 0, 2.85, 6.12, 0 and 12.99 per 1000 urinary catheter days in CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU, respectively. During 23.7-23.9, the incidence of CAUTI was 2.98, 6.13, 8.66, 0 and 0 per 1000 urinary catheter days in CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU, respectively. Notably, hospitalisation days/indwelling urinary catheter days were positively correlated with the occurrence of CAUTI in each quarter (p < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between urinary catheter indwelling time and the occurrence of UTI.